he Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has acknowledged publicly for the first time that the agency gave false information about its COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring. Dr. Rochelle Walensky admitted that her agency falsely claimed it was carrying out robust safety monitoring in 2021 and that it only actually did so from March 2022 – but it still refuses to release the full data. The Epoch Times has the story.
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the [CDC’s] Director, said in a letter made public on September 12th that the CDC did not analyse certain types of adverse event reports at all in 2021, despite the agency previously saying it started in February 2021.
“CDC performed PRR analysis between March 25th 2022, through July 31st 2022,” Walensky said. “CDC also recently addressed a previous statement made to the Epoch Times to clarify PRR were not run between February 26th 2021 to September 30th 2021.”
Walensky’s agency had promised in severaldocuments, starting in early 2021, to perform a type of analysis called Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) on reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which it helps manage.
But the agency said in June that it did not perform PRRs. It also said that performing them was “outside th[e] agency’s purview”.
Confronted with the contradiction, Dr. John Su, a CDC official, told the Epoch Timesin July that the agency started performing PRRs in February 2021 and “continues to do so to date.”
But just weeks later, the CDC said Su was wrong.
“CDC performed PRRs from March 25th 2022 through July 31st 2022,” a spokeswoman told the Epoch Timesin August.
Walensky’s new letter, dated September 2nd and sent on September 6th to Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), shows that Walensky is aware that her agency gave false information. Walensky’s letter included no explanation of why that happened.
This wasn’t supposed to happen. For months, I have been writing article after article about the rapidly growing global food crisis, but even though drought is devastating so many other crops all over the planet I thought that there would be plenty of rice in 2023. Unfortunately, I was wrong. As you will see below, some of the biggest rice producers in the entire world are being hit really hard, and rice production is going to be way below expectations this year. Of course rice is one of the primary staples that poor nations depend upon, and so this is a really big deal. If there is a serious shortage of rice in 2023, that is going to have enormous implications for all of us.
An announcement that India just made should be front page news all over the globe right now.
India usually accounts for over 40 percent of all worldwide rice shipments, but now they have placed severe restrictions on all future exports this year…
India banned exports of broken rice and imposed a 20% duty on exports of various grades of rice on Thursday as the world’s biggest exporter of the grain tries to augment supplies and calm local prices after below-average monsoon rainfall curtailed planting.
India exports rice to more than 150 countries, and any reduction in its shipments would increase upward pressure on food prices, which are already rising because of drought, heat-waves and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Stanford Professor Grace Lee is the Chair of the CDC’s outside committee on vaccine safety. I tried everything I could think of to get her attention on the critical Israeli vaccine safety information. She ignored me and called the cops. I have the whole thing on video. She cannot now claim plausible deniability.
Surely, she would want to see this data. How could she not want to see the data? She is arguably the top vaccine safety person in the world outside of the CDC.
Dr. Martin Kulldorff wanted to see the Israeli data and he has similar credentials (Harvard Professor, formerly on FDA and CDC committees, highly respected in the vaccine community). But he has no active role in vaccine safety. It’s not his job. Yet he wanted to see the data since he’s in the vaccine field.
Unlike Dr. Kulldorff, it’s Dr. Lee’s job to be aware of the safety data for the vaccine. It’s her most important responsibility. If there is a single person in the world who would be most interested in seeing the vaccine safety data, it should be Dr. Lee.
Just to double-check my logic, I asked Martin why would anyone in an official position of responsibility on vaccine safety NOT want to see the Israeli data? He said, “I don’t know.”
So the default assumption is that Dr. Lee would want to see the data as well, just like Dr. Kulldorff.
Oddly, Dr. Lee didn’t respond to my respectful emails asking if she wanted to see the data. If she had responded either yes or no, that would have been the end of it. But I heard nothing.
I don’t give up so easily. So I texted her cell phone.
And that didn’t work either! Again, no response. She could have simply responded “no” and that would have been the end of it. Baffling!
Perhaps her text messages weren’t working? This happened to my AT&T phone recently where text messages didn’t work until AT&T reset my messaging.
I knew how important this data was to the world and surely she would want to see it but clearly my messages must simply be buried in all the emails and text messages she gets or something else was getting in the way. My question deserves an answer because lives are at stake!
It would not be right for me to give up at this point without trying every option at my disposal to get her attention on this matter.
Since she conveniently lives just 10 minutes from my house, I went to her front door and rang the doorbell. I waited and waited for her to answer the door, but nobody came to the door. So I left.
I’ve tried this multiple times. I guess I keep missing her. Darn.
Today I tried again. This time I waited because there was a light on inside the house. I waited about 20 minutes for her to answer the door. After all, she could be on zoom call, taking a shower, or doing something important like feeding the dog.
I just wanted an answer… “why don’t you want to see the data?” That’s it.
After around 20 minutes of waiting at her door, I gave up, went back to my car, and wrote a nice note asking if she wanted to see the data, and attached it to the hook on her front door.
The note said:
Dr. Lee,
Do you want to see the Israeli safety data? Please let me know yes or no. Lives are at stake. Steve Kirsch 650-xxx-xxxx.
Here’s the image of the note (the hole was where it was attached to the door hook):
The note I attached to Dr. Lee’s door. I blurred my phone number in the photo. This is from the live video (the police officer is holding the note).
As I was leaving, I was greeted by two Palo Alto police officers.
So I started my video camera to record the only proof of delivery I was ever going to get.
Clearly, she was at home and didn’t want to answer the door and have a friendly conversation about the scientific data that could save hundreds of thousands of lives.
She has a Ring doorbell. She could have said “Hello, who is there?”
But no. She chose to remain completely silent and call the police.
I guess that’s the way science works today: you are never supposed to actually speak with anyone with opposing views, even if they have lifesaving information not available elsewhere.
I handed the note I had put on her door to the officer and I saw him share it with her as I walked to my car. So the message was delivered for sure… by the Palo Alto Police!
So if she didn’t know already, she knows now why I was there and there is now a public record of the delivery to the officer.
And there was no call on my cell phone after that. This means that she was notified and declined to see the data, jeopardizing lives.
The bottom line is this: I went the extra mile to eliminate any possible plausible deniability excuse. Even if I had Fedex’ed the offer to see the data, she could say she never saw my FedEx. Now she cannot claim she never saw it.
So now I finally have closure. The answer is, “I received your message and no, I don’t want to see the safety data showing scientific proof that the vaccines are not safe and I’m not going to tell you why I don’t want to see the data either.”
Wow.
The officers handled it well. I have no complaints.
Many people in the medical field will intentionally close their eyes to the possibility a medical injury occurred or data showing that a drug they endorsed is toxic. Here’s why:
I was proud that I did everything I possibly could do to draw Dr. Lee’s urgent attention to this very important safety issue. I wonder if she is equally proud of ducking my question, refusing to answer her door, and calling the cops on me for trying to bring this issue to her attention?
Once the BBC alerted Facebook’s parent company, Meta, the groups were removed.
So the world’s top vaccine outside regulator doesn’t want to see the safety data from the Israeli Ministry of Health, and the BBC is engaging in deplatforming the vaccine injured so they don’t have a voice either.
Nobody in charge wants to know about what the data really shows, and the mainstream press wants to make sure you only hear their side of the narrative.
We should all be very concerned about both of these developments and demand answers.
The largest decline has been among these two highly jabbed groups, dropping from 71.8 years in 2019 to 65.2 years in 2021.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
According to the latest statistics, life expectancy in the United States dropped precipitously in 2020 and 2021. In 2019, the average life span of Americans of all ethnicities was nearly 79 years. By the end of 2021, life expectancy had dropped to 76 — a loss of nearly three years
Even small declines in life expectancy of a tenth or two-…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Dr. Mercola’s Censored Library (Private Membership) to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
Not only did new research show that two COVID-19 shots offered basically no protection but also that natural immunity lasts longer and is superior to multiple COVID-19 shots.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Natural COVID-19 immunity — the type earned by recovering from infection — is not only effective but lasts longer than the immunity that’s acquired from COVID-19 shots
Two doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots (BNT162b2) offered only “negligible” protection against symptomatic BA.2 (an omicron subvariant) infection
In contrast, previous infect…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Dr. Mercola’s Censored Library (Private Membership) to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
CBD oil, a nonpsychoactive cannabinoid, was instrumental in shrinking lung tumors, a case study shows.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In a case study, one year after diagnosis with lung adenocarcinoma and having refused all other treatment, an 81-year-old man took CBD oil and experienced a remarkable reduction in tumor size
The reduction in tumor size was documented by his physicians through X-ray and CT scans. In one study using two cannabinoid compounds, data yielded…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Dr. Mercola’s Censored Library (Private Membership) to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
