Day: October 7, 2022

(Natural News) Newly released data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that around a third of participants who signed up for a voluntary Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine safety monitoring program suffered from significant adverse events, with nearly eight percent of those side effects requiring professional medical care.

The data came from v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based program created by the CDC specifically to monitor the effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. To sign up, people simply have to download the app onto their smartphones, register and provide periodic health check-ins after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. (Related: CDC data & scientific study suggest 1.2 million Americans may already have died due to COVID vaccination.)

In June 2021, the Informed Consent Action Network filed two lawsuits for the v-safe data to be made public, led by Siri & Glimstad LLP lawyers Aaron Siri and Elizabeth A. Brehm. Following months of legal wrangling, the CDC finally capitulated when a court ordered the agency to produce the data.

According to ICAN and Siri and Brem, the data produced thus far by the CDC is limited because v-safe only provides users with a limited number of fields to choose from when reporting health concerns.

V-safe also provides users with free-text fields where they can write down more detailed descriptions of their health concerns. The data contained in these free-text fields have not been made public. Siri and Brehm have stated that they will continue to litigate to obtain this data and more.

Before the court order by ICAN and its attorneys, the CDC has never released v-safe publicly. All other requests before the court order were ignored or rejected.

Millions of symptoms reported

Approximately 10.108 million people signed up for v-safe and voluntarily reported their health following COVID-19 vaccinations.

Of those 10.108 million people, 3.353 million – around 33.17 percent of  all participants – reported being impacted by the COVID-19 vaccines. Of the people who reported being impacted, 1.226 million – 12.13 percent of all participants – reported being unable to do normal daily activities because of the vaccine. Another 1.344 million – 13.3 percent of all v-safe participants – reported being unable to do work or attend school because of the vaccinations.

Some 782,913 people, or 7.7 percent of everyone who signed up for v-safe, reported requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, hospitalization or other care from a doctor or other healthcare professional because of the vaccine.

All of the participants of v-safe also reported a total of 71 million symptoms or an average of more than seven symptoms per v-safe user. One of the most common symptoms was joint pain, with around four million v-safe users experiencing it. Of these, around two million reported experiencing mild joint pain, 1.8 million moderate joint pain and over 400,000 severe joint pain.

Other symptoms noted by v-safe users include fatigue, muscle or body aches, headaches, abdominal pain, other kinds of pain, swelling, chills, nausea, redness, itching, diarrhea, vomiting, irritability, drowsiness, loss of appetite, rash outside the injection site and swelling in the groin or underarm area.

Around 13,000 infants under two years old were also registered in v-safe. The parents and guardians of these infants reported over 33,000 symptoms, with the most common being irritability, sleeplessness, pain and loss of appetite.

Visit VaccineInjuryNews.com for more news related to the adverse effects and injuries caused by COVID-19 vaccines.

Watch this episode of the “Health Ranger Report” as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, discusses how nearly half of Americans are still willing to commit suicide by vaccine.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Lawsuit forces CDC to hand over V-safe data showing incriminating COVID vaccine injuries.

CDC confirms aluminum in vaccines linked to childhood asthma and AUTISM.

CDC admits myocarditis being linked to COVID-19 vaccines is TRUE, not misinformation.

CDC admits KILLER BATCHES of COVID-19 shots are still given to the public.

CDC FRAUD: Emails confirm that CDC officials fraudulently changed the definition of “vaccine” to force needless mRNA injections onto the population.

Sources include:

SteveKirsch.Substack.com

PRNewswire.com

ICANDecide.org

Brighteon.com

(Natural News) “The HighWire” host Del Bigtree pointed out that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to promote vaccination schedules for babies, even though a recent government study showed that the aluminum in children’s vaccines are linked to asthma.

According to the aforementioned study published September 2022 in Academic Pediatrics, young children injected with most or all the aluminum-tainted vaccines in the schedule had a 36 percent higher risk of being diagnosed with persistent asthma than those who got fewer vaccines. The study authors, however, refused to point their fingers at the aluminum adjuvant.

Investigative journalist Jefferey Jaxen pointed out the study’s flaws. He remarked: “The bigger story here is not what the study included, but it’s what the study did not include.”

“It looked for the association between aluminum exposure for vaccines before age 24 months and persistent asthma at age 24 to 59 months and children were excluded if they were not using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) site for preventative care.” The VSD project was established in 1990 by the CDC to study the adverse effects of vaccines.

According to Jaxen, listed on the site are children having less than two well-child visits between birth through 11 months, or zero well-child visits between age 12 to 23 months. Well-child visits are pediatrician appointments with immunization as the main purpose.

“They’re not allowing people that just didn’t go inside the VSD site. Those who went to an outside doctor, they’re excluded,” host Del Bigtree said. “It’s one of the scams they use. They exclude anyone that didn’t have at least two well-baby checkups.”

Furthermore, the study provided that children were excluded if they received a diagnosis of asthma. “They’re studying for asthma in any setting prior to age 24 months. The child develops asthma after the first 26 vaccine doses they received between zero to 24 months and they want nothing to do with these kids.”

Aluminum has been used in some vaccines since the 1930s, as an ingredient or adjuvant that provokes stronger immune protection. Babies by age two should be vaccinated against 15 diseases, according to U.S. recommendations. Aluminum adjuvants are in vaccines for seven of them.

Aluminum adjuvants have long been considered safe and effective, but experts noted a period of increased rates of allergies and asthma in children starting in about 1980.

“We are getting these milquetoast studies. They’re whitewashing the studies, they’re excluding kids, less than two well-child visits,” Jaxen commented.

Dr. Paul Thomas: For more accurate studies, no one should be excluded

Elsewhere in the show, Bigtree played his prior interview with integrative pediatrics practitioner Dr. Paul Thomas, wherein they discussed the “vaccine-friendly plan” created by the latter.

“In 2016, I created the dataset published in a peer-reviewed journal that included the vaccinated and unvaccinated in a study that’s based on real-world data of over 3000 patients all every single patient born into my practice,” Thomas recounted, highlighting that he did not cherry pick the participants of the study.

According to him, he was a pro-vaccine doctor trained in mainstream medicine until he started hearing from patients and seeing it for himself that all medical chronic conditions are clearly more prevalent in the highly vaccinated. He launched a study and had it rigorously quality-checked and eventually published in November 2020.

“It took months to get it through that process. But the data that was checked, it’s powerful,” the doctor said.

“For eye infections, way up in the vaccinated ear infections, throat infections, allergies, and then you go on down for lung infections, take it to the whole body, ADD, ADHD, anemia. All significantly increased. You’ll see on the summary, the orange curve for those with vaccines just goes up over the years. While it’s almost flatlined for the unvaccinated.” (Related: Dr. Stephanie Christner: Innocent people are walking into a poison prison called the vaccine schedule – Brighteon.TV.)

Visit Vaccines.news for more news related to children’s vaccine schedule and its potential harmful adverse events.

Watch the full segment of “The HighWire with Del Bigtree” featuring Jefferey Jaxen below.

This video is from the HighWire with Del Bigtree channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

CDC, FDA prepare mass distribution of a Merck/Sanofi six-in-one vaccine for kids, turning blind eye to safety signals.

Pfizer now targeting children with new Lyme disease “vaccines.”

COVID vaccines can damage innate immune systems of children, epidemiologist warns.

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

CDC.gov

ScienceDirect.com

(Natural News) The National Institutes of Health (NIH) awarded a new grant to EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), the group responsible for gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. Led by Peter Daszak, EHA’s research alongside the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) gave rise to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

The $653,392 grant titled “Analyzing the potential for future bat coronavirus emergence in Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam” was awarded to the New York-based EHA on Sept. 21. It seeks to identify areas of potential concern for future pandemic emergence in order to help public health authorities suppress an outbreak before it breaks containment.

EHA elaborated that the grant’s long-term goal is to “build pandemic preparedness strategies to better predict sites and communities where wildlife-origin viruses are likely to emerge, and to disrupt emergence in [emerging infectious disease] hotspots around the world.

The group proposed to collect samples of viruses from wildlife and then “rapidly supply viral sequences and isolates for use in vaccine and therapeutic development,” likely meaning that the researchers could ship live viruses around the globe.

“Most pandemics are caused by animal-origin viruses that emerge in regions where people have high contact with wildlife and where illnesses or outbreaks may be missed. This project builds on two decades of work that identifies the border region of Southern China, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam as a high risk for future emergence of novel coronaviruses and the potential site where SARS-CoV-2 first ‘spilled over’ from bats to people,” the grant’s public health relevance statement said.

“We will conduct in-depth surveys and serological testing in communities with high exposure to wildlife, identify wildlife reservoirs of the coronaviruses they are exposed to and use clinic-based surveillance to assess cases and clusters of associated illnesses – as well as testing public health strategies – to disrupt spillover and spread.” (Related: Emails show NIH funded gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses.)

EHA investigated by Congress over role in COVID-19 pandemic

The Sept. 21 grant followed earlier funding issued to EHA, alongside an investigation by Congress over the organization’s role in the COVID-19 pandemic.

In August 2022, the NIH terminated a sub-grant awarded to the WIV which was part of an earlier grant to EHA. The institute informed the House Oversight Committee that the organization led by Daszak had refused to turn over laboratory notebooks and other records as mandated.

“NIH has requested, on two occasions, that EHA provide … the laboratory notebooks and original electronic files from the research conducted at WIV,” the institute stated in a letter to the committee. “To date, WIV has not provided these records.”

The NIH later informed EHA and WIV of the sub-grant’s termination on Aug. 19 for “material non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the award.” It wrote: “Since WIV is unable to fulfill its duties, … the WIV [sub-grant] is terminated for failure to meet award terms and conditions requiring provision of records to NIH upon request.”

Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist with Rutgers University‘s Waksman Institute, commented on EHA’s multiple ongoing grants. The group led by Daszak already had two prior grants that are still ongoing, and the third one involved the WIV which is under negotiation.

“It is disturbing that additional funding continues to be awarded for the same high-risk research that may have caused the current pandemic, before there has been a national investigation of the origin of the current pandemic,” he said.

Ebright, a staunch critic of Daszak, also zeroed in on the latter’s noncompliance with NIH requests for information. The molecular biologist cited requests sent by the institute on Nov. 5, 2021 and Jan. 6 for the notebooks and electronic files. Given this, he also found it “disturbing that additional funding continues to be awarded to a contractor that the NIH has reported to have repeatedly and seriously violated contractual terms and conditions of a grant.”

Corruption.news has more stories about corrupt practices in the federal government.

Watch EHA President Peter Daszak recount how his research team collected virus samples in China and manipulated them.

This video is from the SoulSearcher channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

The NIH is funding a new animal experiment center in Texas to develop vaccines for EBOLA… when will the next “lab leak” go down?

Pentagon exposed for funneling $39 million to Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance to produce novel coronavirus bioweapons.

NIH gave EcoHealth Alliance authority to self-police risky gain-of-function experiments in Wuhan.

Ukrainian biolabs linked to EcoHealth Alliance, which helped create and unleash COVID-19.

EcoHealth Alliance president thanked Fauci for downplaying lab leak hypothesis.

Sources include:

TheIntercept.com

RePORTER.NIH.gov

Brighteon.com