Dr. Peter McCullough is being progressively stripped of his medical credentials

Peter McCullough is an author of 677 articles published in the scientific peer-reviewed journals. He’s one of the most respected cardiologists in the world. He’s been right about everything throughout the pandemic. He has an encyclopedic memory of every paper he’s ever read. And he’s just a wonderful, nice person to boot. You really never met a nicer guy.

He’s sacrificed everything so he can speak the truth about the COVID policies. If there was one COVID advisor that the government should be listening to, Dr. Peter McCullough would be at the top of every list.

So how is he being rewarded for having the courage to speak the truth?

I got this message from him this morning:

I was terminated as the Editor-In-Chief of Cardiorenal Medicine and Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine after years of service and rising impact factors.  There was no phone call, no board meeting, no due process.  Just e-mails or certified letters.  Powerful dark forces are working in academic medicine to expunge any resistance to the vax. 

Yesterday I was stripped of my board certifications in Internal Medicine and Cardiology after decades of perfect clinical performance, board scores, and hundreds of peer reviewed publications.   

None of this will stop until there is a “needle in every arm.”

Want to see what the medical journal said about his termination? Here it is:

I also received this message from Dr. Ronald Kostoff who authored a paper showing how deadly the vaccines are:

The EIC of Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT) has resigned.  Based on his letter below, there are myriad reasons, but I suspect the main one is the pushback from having published the Seneff et al article.  In my view, this does not bode well for the Seneff article.  Hope I’m wrong.

Here is the email the Editor-in-Chief sent out:

From: José Luis Domingo Roig <joseluis.domingo@urv.cat>

Date: Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 6:17 AM

Subject: My resignation as Editor-in-Chief of FCT induced by the PUBLISHER. Currently FCT is a BLUFF!

To:

Dear colleagues/friends (1st relation), 

Due to deep discrepancies in the way of directing FCT in recent months, a few days ago (October 16th) I sent to our Publisher, Jagna Mirska, a resignation message and early termination of my agreement with FCT (my current contract would end on December 31, 2023). The resignation was accepted yesterday. It means that I will end of receiving new submissions on November 6th (21 days after the date of resignment, based on the clausula of the agreement). 

Firstly, I want to thank your valuable help during the 6 years and 10 months in which I have been the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of the Journal. Of course, without your valuable collaboration as Editors, AEs, authors and reviewers, the great achievements of FCT would have not been possible. You will remember that in 2021, FCT reached the first position (according to the Clarivate IF) among all the Journals on general toxicology. We were going for an IF = 7.0, never reached before by a toxicology journal. From now on, and with the new EiC, curiously appointed before being my resignation accepted, Dr Bryan Delaney (according to Scopus, he has 57 documents and h-index: 20), I am afraid you can forget about this. 

I ignore if you are aware of this. The significant decrease in the IF (from 6.0 in 2020 to 5.5 in 2021) was mainly because Clarivate included the RIFM documents published in FCT as citable items. Since I was appointed EiC of FCT, the IF had been continuously increasing until surpassing that of Arch Toxicol, doubtless the Journal #1 during years in general toxicology. I cannot understand why Clarivate included the RIFM documents as citable items, when it is evident that they are not scientific papers. However, in spite of my claims to the Publisher, I have no record on the negotiations between Clarivate and the Direction of FCT to solve this incongruity. It seems that for the Direction of FCT, the IF is not something sufficiently important for the prestige of the Journal. The IF is something important only for all of us, but not for them. The economic benefits obtained with the publication of the RIFM documents are doubtless much more important. I have never been informed on the sum obtained by publishing these documents, which are a drag for the IF of FCT. 

On the other hand, since a few months ago FCT is the Official Journal of the Chinese SOT, another of my points of concern. Right now, more than 70-75% of our submissions come from China. If one of my main concerns had always been the lack of submissions from expert authors in Canada-USA/Europe, who can think that being now FCT the official journal of the Chinese SOT, this will increase the number of US/European good submissions? I do believe that just on the contrary. In a couple of years, the papers from non-Chinese authors will be the exception.  

Just a couple of years ago -and this is written- the Publisher of FCT suggested to me that we should be very careful with the number of papers accepted from Chinese colleagues. Interestingly, 2 years later, FCT is the Official Journal of the Chinese SOT. I am sure that the Publisher did not inform them -when the agreement was signed- on her previous suggestion. However, I assume that the agreement with the Chinese SOT should mean a good (economic) injection for the Journal and she and her Bosses will be happy. 

Last, but not the least. A few months ago, I published in FCT an Editorial on the lack of publications of studies on the potential toxicological effects of the vaccines for the COVID-19. I have not any proof, just feelings, but I think that the Editorial -and its consequences, among others, with a Review-paper published in FCT that I have not allowed to retract- was the final nail in my coffin.  

Doubtless, and based on my almost 7 years as EiC, I should highlight that the commercial interests and economic benefits are the main priority in FCT. No the quality of the papers, and the prestige of the Journal based on the IF. 

Economic benefits are currently the most important for the Direction of FCT. The scientific interest is just for us, the authors, who pay for publishing in Open Access, for the reviewers who work for nothing (sooner than late the reviewer will be paid), and for most Editors -like me- who have not had an only day of vacation in the last 7 years. All of you, who have contacted me during that time, know well this how fast are my responses.  

I am fully disappointed with the Direction of FCT. Instead of solving the above indicated problems -created by them- they have accepted rapidly my resignment, because probably I was going a burden for them. It does not matter what you and I have done by the Journal. Science is not their business although they try to dress it as such. A BIG LIE! 

I would sincerely appreciate your thoughts and ask for your support in the way that you feel more appropriate. A good response could be to quarantine FCT (without agreeing to review or publish) until the Direction decide that the scientific issues are a priority. I may be deluded, but maybe we can. 

Thanks again for your valuable help during these years. 

Best wishes, 

Jose L 

PS. Please pass this message to your colleagues. Thank you 

Dr Jose L. Domingo

Distinguished Professor (Emeritus) of Toxicology and Environmental Health

Universitat Rovira i Virgili, School of Medicine

Sant Llorens 21, 43201 Reus, SPAIN

Tel: 34 977 759380; Fax: 977 759322; e-mail: joseluis.domingo@urv.cat

www.tecnatox.cat

If you thought you could trust what is published in medical journals, you might want to reconsider your position.

Share

Panel of experts: More and more young people are dying because of COVID-19 vaccines

Image: Panel of experts: More and more young people are dying because of COVID-19 vaccines

(Natural News) A panel of experts, including physicians and a funeral home director, discuss how they are seeing more and more young people die because of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.

This discussion, hosted by the RAIR Foundation, was meant to talk about matters involving the theme “Sudden Death of Youth.” It was co-hosted by Dr. Sam Dube and activist Glen Macko. The focus of the discussion was the phenomena of fully vaccinated, but otherwise healthy individuals between the ages of 10 and 40 suddenly dying.

The speakers shared personal stories of seeing patients injured and killed by the vaccine. According to Dube, this was done so that the panel’s viewers “can better understand and better see what’s happening, in the hopes that you can save lives, and help people who have been so affected.

Some of the victims they discussed included a fit and healthy 28-year-old woman who died just 90 minutes after she was vaccinated. The panel noted that she was coerced into taking the vaccine because her physicians refused to provide her with minor surgery unless she was vaccinated.

Another victim they discussed was a healthy 30-year-old man who dropped dead out of nowhere. When his body was autopsied, they found his arteries were severely blocked. Another was a mother of two girls in her 30s who never woke up after going to sleep one night. She had no comorbidities and was considered very healthy.

This panel discussion was held less than a week after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced it was officially recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for all children in the United States as part of their annual vaccination schedule. States will decide, based on the influence of this recommendation, whether to mandate the vaccine for school entry. (Related: Post-mortem examinations find massive blood clot biostructures in bodies of the vaccinated.)

Brighteon.TV

Vaccinated people dying with strange clots in their veins

Dr. Kirk A. Milhoan, a 20-year pediatric cardiologist with a specialty in dealing with heart-related health complications, noted that he has treated close to 700 COVID-19 patients.

“I’ve been seeing an increase in adverse events in teenagers from the boosters and vaccine recently,” he said. “And now I’m seeing a much worse course with COVID for those who have been vaccinated and boosted, as opposed to those who haven’t.”

Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist trained by the Mayo Clinic, warned that he has seen “patterns change in tissues as well as blood” since the rollout of the vaccines.

“Once the shots rolled out, we started seeing all sorts of conditions that increased, and now recently, we’ve seen a big increase in the youth of sudden death since the rollout of not just the shots but the boosters as well,” said Cole.

He added later during the panel that he and many other physicians already understand clearly how the COVID-19 vaccines are affecting people, especially young and healthy people, including many athletes who have dropped dead since the beginning of the vaccine rollout.

“To introduce [the vaccine] into the body, into these young individuals with a statistically zero risk from COVID really is concerning,” he said.

Richard Hirschman, an embalmer and funeral director from Alabama with over 20 years of experience, said he has also noticed a huge change in the demographic of the people that come to his funeral home.

“Since 2021, more people under 40 who suddenly died have been arriving, and many of them showed abnormal blood clotting,” Hirschman said. He described their blood as stringy, rubber-like protein clots. This change in the nature of people’s blood echoes what Cole warned about.

“We were finding clots in the arteries as well as in the veins,” he said. “The veins are typically where we find clots. But we would hardly ever see a clot in the artery itself.”

Learn more about the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines at VaccineDamage.news.

Watch this short clip from “Frontline Health” discussing how Hirschman kept finding clots in the bodies of the vaccinated.

This video is from the channel The Prisoner on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Biden lied as Americans died: Coffin suppliers, insurance companies, embalmers, funeral directors and miscarriage reports confirm vax deaths spiked as teh CDC hid critical data.

‘Never seen’ before: Embalmers finding long, rubbery clots inside corpses since implementation of COVID vaccines.

EXCLUSIVE: Natural News releases post-vaccine clot ICP-MS elemental analysis results, comparing clots to human blood … findings reveal these clots are NOT “blood” clots.

Dr. Jane Ruby: Two new stunning discoveries found in blood clots from the COVID vaccinated – Brighteon.TV.

WATCH: Dr. Jane Ruby offers fresh insights about self-assembling “clots” and “nanowires” found in fully vaccinated cadavers.

Sources include:

RAIRFoundation.com

Reuters.com

Brighteon.com

Nearly 2 in 10 cows injected with mRNA vaccine DIE almost instantly

Image: Nearly 2 in 10 cows injected with mRNA vaccine DIE almost instantly

(Natural News) Dairy farmers in Australia are now being forced to inject the gene-altering mRNA vaccine that contains spike protein so they could remain in business. Just like in humans, the experimental jabs are causing severe damage to the animals and many of them died instantly.

Independent media portal InfoWars recently reported that 35 out of 200 cows died immediately after being administered the injection. (Related: LETHAL INJECTIONS: 18% of cattle DIE immediately following mRNA “vaccination.”)

Analysts consider the mandatory vaccination of cows as a direct attack on food supply. Many of them are asking if the milk and other by-products would contain the spike protein that actually harmed the animals.

“Dairy herd DNA is altered. Milk is altered and you consume it. Butter constitution, yogurt, cheese and meat are altered. Will chicken and other meats be next?” Principia Scientific International (PSI), a legally registered company in the U.K. incorporated for charitable purposes, said in a statement posted on its website.

According to the firm, all should be careful when consuming dairy products as well as beef products like burgers. PSI further suggested growing their own food and developing herds that are private, none tagged and never vaccinated.

“Time to set up a community farm association with member farmers who are not part of the system, have herds or animals that are not jabbed or tagged so a community of private people can be consumers of organically produced livestock,” it added.

There is no science behind mandatory COVID-19 mRNA injections in animals

New South Wales (NSW) was the first to have cattle herds injected with mRNA. The NSW government’s reason for the animal vaccination drive is to protect them not just from the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) but also from foot and mouth disease (FMD) and lumpy skin disease.

Brighteon.TV

As per Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional NSW Paul Toole, this move is an important milestone toward securing the vaccine technology that will protect Australia’s $28.7 billion livestock industry.

“The NSW Nationals in Government are taking the threat of FMD and Lumpy Skin Disease extremely seriously, and this milestone is another step forward in preparing for a potential outbreak,” Toole said. He added that he has already written to the vaccine manufacturer to take his challenge to develop vaccines ready for use and manufacture in NSW by August 1 next year.

In other words, there’s no science involved in the recent mRNA vaccination drive on cattle herds.

“COVID-19 demonstrated to us that all possible avenues in developing vaccines must be explored and we will leave no stone unturned,” Toole said, referring to how the approval of the vaccine mandate has been fast-tracked.

Minister for Agriculture Dugald Saunders said U.S. biotechnology company Tiba Biotech has been given free rein to churn out as many mRNA injections as possible to supposedly protect Australia’s multi-billion livestock industry. He said it is critical to developing mRNA vaccines for FMD and lumpy skin as quickly as possible.

Visit Vaccines.news for more news related to the lethal mRNA vaccines that are now being administered to animals.

Watch the below video where Dr. Jane Ruby exposed sociopaths preparing to inject cattle and animals with mRNA vaccines.

This video is from the High Hopes channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

ZOOTARDS ON PARADE: Toronto Zoo absurdly claims its animals are VOLUNTARILY getting injected with the COVID vaccine.

MIND-BLOWING: Oakland and Denver zoos giving COVID-19 spike protein vaccines to animals – including bears, gorillas, tigers and mountain lions.

Now they’re vaccinating gorillas at the zoo for coronavirus.

INSANITY: Phoenix Zoo vaccinates 75 ANIMALS for COVID-19 – all of them endangered species.

Sources include:

InfoWars.com

Principia-Scientific.com

NexusNewsFeed.com

NSW.gov.au

Brighteon.com

Vaccine mandate adverse effect: Army falls 25% short of 2022 recruitment goal

Image: Vaccine mandate adverse effect: Army falls 25% short of 2022 recruitment goal

(Natural News) The United States Army missed its recruitment goal for the 2022 fiscal year by 25 percent, or 15,000 new soldiers. This comes as the Army already cut its projection for how many new people it could bring into the military.

The military’s recruiting shortfall is occurring despite the fact that a recent Gallup survey noted that 64 percent of Americans have confidence in the nation’s military. The Army is only projected to recruit around 10,000 people this year, and the number of new recruits for 2023 could decline even further. (Related: U.S. Army recommends soldiers suffering under #Bidenflation apply for food stamps – while Congress spends tens of billions on foreign aid.)

The Army is also set to lose tens of thousands of national guard and reserve soldiers who have refused to get vaccinated against Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). Roughly 40,000 National Guard and 22,000 Reserve soldiers have already been cut off from their military benefits for not complying with the vaccine mandate, according to the Army.

That same vaccine mandate could also be the main reason why thousands of young Americans were opting not to join the armed forces.

Meanwhile, U.S. Army Secretary Christine Wormuth noted that the Army is spending more than ever before on new technologies to replace its aging military infrastructure. But all of this new military tech will be worthless, especially when compared to other major military powers like China, if the Army can’t recruit enough people to be trained on how to handle the new tech.

“We can develop all of the most high-tech weapons systems like we are working on right now, but if we don’t have the kinds of talented, motivated individuals to use those weapons systems, we won’t be able to do what we need to do,” said Wormuth.

Brighteon.TV

Number of openings in military keeps increasing

The Army, the largest branch of the U.S. Armed Forces, has a current workforce of around 466,000 people. Given the poor state of the economy and the labor market, where the gap between the number of job openings and job seekers remains wide, the Army is having difficulty retaining its people and finding new recruits.

“We’re competing for talent just like all of the folks in industry are, and the job market is hot right now,” said Wormuth. “Wages have gone up a lot, and that’s great for Americans, but it’s making it harder for us in the Army to compete.”

Wormuth noted that all other branches of the military are having trouble recruiting, and she noted that a variety of factors other than the economy are affecting enlistment. A lot of people who do want to sign up are turned away due to learning losses due to the shutdown of schools and the decline in fitness standards among American youth.

“Only about 23 percent of kids between 16 and 21 are able to meet our standards, and some of that, frankly, is reflective of the problem that we have in our country with obesity,” said Wormuth. She added that behavioral health and misconduct are also factors.

Perhaps more worryingly for the secretary is the decreasing “propensity to serve,” or the inclination among the population to serve their country by joining the military. Wormuth regarded this to be a “really hard problem.”

“Right now, only nine percent of young Americans say that they’re interested in joining the military,” she said, noting that declining propensity to serve is one of the military’s long-term challenges.

“That’s going to take time to change, but a lot of it I think is about getting out there and doing a better job of talking to young Americans about what the Army can do for them, and the incredible breadth of skills that they can have access to in the Army,” said Wormuth. “We have over 178 military occupational specialties in the Army and it’s not just infantry.”

“We’ve got data scientists, nurses, doctors, lawyers, paralegals, and I think we’ve got to do a better job of explaining that to young Americans and their parents.”

Watch this clip from “Wake Up America” on Newsmax as hosts Carl Higbie and Amanda Brilhante discuss why all branches of the military are seeing massive recruiting shortfalls.

This is from the News Clips channel on Brighteon.com.

More related articles:

U.S. military degrading rapidly under Biden, Dem-controlled Congress… now rated “weak” even as global threats are rising.

Woke U.S. military failing to recruit because nobody wants to defend American degeneracy.

Active-duty serviceman blames “woke” policies for Army’s worst recruiting year in nearly five decades.

Navy offering up to $65,000 to pay off student loans of recruits as enlistment figures continue to decline.

Americans are refusing to join the military despite generous enlistment incentives.

Sources include:

CNBC.com

NBCNews.com

Brighteon.com

‘Daylight Robbery’: Pfizer Condemned for Hiking US Covid Vaccine Price by 10,000% Above Cost

“While health workers and the vulnerable continue to go unvaccinated in developing countries, Pfizer is shamelessly fleecing the public for ever-greater sums of money,” said one campaigner.

Vaccine equity campaigners on Friday condemned Pfizer for announcing that it will soon raise the price of its publicly funded Covid-19 shot to between $110 and $130 per dose in the U.S., a move that comes as the Biden administration is preparing to end the nation’s free coronavirus vaccine program as pandemic response funding runs dry.

Reuters reported late Thursday that Angela Lukin, an executive at Pfizer, said the New York-based pharmaceutical giant “expects” that the vaccine “will be made available at no cost to people who have private insurance or government-paid insurance.”

“This latest obscene price hike is truly a mask-off moment for one of the great profiteers of this pandemic.”

The outlet noted that Lukin did not say whether the company will make any accommodations for the tens of millions of people in the U.S. without any health insurance.

The People’s Vaccine Alliance said in a statement Friday that Pfizer’s planned price hike would amount to a 10,000% markup above the cost of producing the vaccine, which is estimated to be as low as $1.18 per dose.

The U.S. currently pays around $30 per dose for Pfizer’s shot.

“While health workers and the vulnerable continue to go unvaccinated in developing countries, Pfizer is shamelessly fleecing the public for ever-greater sums of money,” said Julia Kosgei, policy adviser to the People’s Vaccine Alliance. “This latest obscene price hike is truly a mask-off moment for one of the great profiteers of this pandemic.”

In the second quarter of this year, Pfizer reported a 78% increase in overall profit compared to the same period in 2021 and said its coronavirus vaccine revenue was $32 billion. The firm is set to report third-quarter earnings early next month.

“This is daylight robbery,” Kosgei said of the coming price increase. “Governments must not stand by while companies like Pfizer hold the world to ransom in a global pandemic.”

“This isn’t just about vaccines,” Kosgei added. “Right now, people in developing countries are dying without access to Paxlovid, an antiviral Covid-19 treatment for which Pfizer is charging hundreds of dollars per course. But there is a proposal at the World Trade Organization that would make it easier for poorer countries to produce generic doses. It’s time for governments to stand up to pandemic profiteers and support it.

Earlier this year, rich countries at the World Trade Organization tanked a popular proposal to temporarily waive coronavirus vaccine patents, a step that would help facilitate the production of generic doses for developing nations. At present, just 23.3% of people in low-income countries have received at least one coronavirus vaccine dose.

Pfizer, along with other pharmaceutical giants, fervently opposed the patent waiver as it sought to preserve its control over production and distribution of the shots, which were developed using government-funded technology.

During a recent panel discussion, World Health Organization Director of Health Emergencies Mike Ryan said the failure to ensure global vaccine equity and prevent millions of deaths was “because of the greed of the north” and “the greed of the pharmaceutical industry.

“We failed because of the self-interest of certain member states that were not prepared to share,” Ryan added.

The Biden administration, which has faced criticism for falling short of its vaccine donations pledges, is taking steps to transition away from providing free vaccines to the U.S. public.

As the Wall Street Journal reported in August, the shift will give “more control of pricing and coverage to the healthcare industry in ways that could generate sales for companies—and costs for consumers—for years to come.”

The early stages of the transition have begun amid mounting fears of a winter spike in coronavirus infections and deaths. Just 4% of eligible people have received the newest Covid-19 booster, according to government data.

While the Biden administration has called for additional pandemic response funding to purchase more tests, treatments, and next-generation vaccines, the effort faces opposition from Republicans who have seized on President Joe Biden’s recent claim that the “pandemic is over” to justify blocking the White House’s request.

“We know from our clinical and research experience that the pandemic is far from over, and that national efforts to secure the health and well-being of the American public are far from complete,” a group of health experts wrote in an open letter earlier this month. “We are deeply concerned that the Biden administration is minimizing Covid at a time when it needs to be redoubling its efforts to ensure funding and resources to prevent another surge.”

BY JAKE JOHNSON,

 

Follow Eddies On Telegram-Popup