Public Defender Letter for Municipal COURTS

By Anna Von Reitz

Many people have written or called me in recent days because they are being harassed by foreign quasi-military courts under a variety of false charges ranging from tax evasion to domestic abuse and so on.  I thought I would take a little time this morning to draft a representative template of a Letter which anyone might send to the Office of the Public Defender in their community as a query regarding any action appearing to be taken against them in a Municipal COURT or addressed to a Municipal PERSON at their mailing address or delivered by Process Server.
The body of this Letter is provided in template form, ready for people to edit in their own specific information, and can be addressed to the Public Defender’s Office at any time after a case number has been assigned, whether or not you have already entered a plea, whether or not you have already unintentionally granted jurisdiction to the COURT, and whether or not you have accepted the services of a Public Defender. Simply read the text closely and edit it as necessary to fit your exact circumstance.
Please note that this letter is only for Municipal COURTS that are addressing Municipal PERSONS and will not serve in cases where a British Territorial Person is being addressed by a Court appearing to be named in Upper and Lower Case and a Defendant named in Upper and Lower Case.  This circumstance will require a different Letter to the Public Defender addressing different issues. I shall hope to have a templated response letter prepared for that situation soon, but have started with a Letter regarding the Municipal COURTS first, as the vast majority of cases start in Municipal COURT and begin by addressing Municipal PERSONS.
It is our objective to “fully inform” the Office of the Public Defender and put them on the spot for failure to make the appropriate inquiries and failure to take logical action. Although this is not framed for the purpose of establishing liability and is presented as a formal but friendly  “question and answer” session with the Public Defender, it will not be lost on them that if they fail to answer and fail to make proper efforts, they can later be held personally and commercially liable for any harm that comes to you.
Also please note that there is a not-so veiled contractual aspect to this Letter, which presents a conditional offer to the Public Defender, leaving it to him or her to accept or counter-offer your proposal at the end of the Letter — in effect, if the Public Defender is competent and able to defend a member of the General Public, and if they guarantee to represent you with no conflict of interest as an Officer of the COURT, they may take the pre-accepted action to have the charges dropped, which is the only action you have offered.
They may come back with “plea deals” attempting to force you to accept at least some kind of charge.  This serves two purposes— first, accepting any kind of plea deal allows them to charge the court’s fees and expenses for their time and effort seeking to entrap you, and second, it relieves them from any admission of wrong-doing.
Your response to plea deal offers should again be short and simple: “Either I am the DEFENDANT or I am not. If I am the DEFENDANT, it’s up to those bringing the charges to prove it with proper evidence on the public record of the COURT. If I am not the DEFENDANT and these charges have been brought to me in error, it is the COURT’S responsibility  to self-correct.”
Keep your communications business-like and in so far as possible, friendly.
If upon your own volition you use this Letter, you assume responsibility for all editing and any additions or deletions and are responsible for closely and thoroughly reading the content so that you understand it and are competent to respond in a reasonable manner to any questions the Public Defender’s Office might have.  You are posing questions that the Public Defender is actually responsible for asking and investigating — basically, doing his job for him or her, and briefly running through the attendant issues.
If the Public Defender responds by asking for more citations about anything in this letter, you can refer to abundant information available in the searchable database on my website, using search words like “Named Entities” and “Municipal PERSON” and “NAME”.
Some documents presented there, including the “Notice Regarding Named Entities/Notice of Liability” which might be adapted to your needs and sent to the Public Defender’s Office as a Next Step if they don’t reply and don’t take action— offer a compendium of appropriate citations of case law and court findings spanning jurisprudence for the last two hundred years on these subjects.
Remember that the Public Defender’s Office is always underfunded and understaffed and usually populated by attorneys who have good hearts but are not the sharpest tools in the shed.  They may ask you for more information because they truly need more information. Don’t be afraid or take offense if they want more back-up information.  You are asking them to undertake a job that they don’t normally do — actually defending a member of the General Public.
See this article and over 3800 others on Anna’s website here:
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

New premier of Alberta apologizes to the unvaccinated, says they never should have been abused by Canadian government

Image: New premier of Alberta apologizes to the unvaccinated, says they never should have been abused by Canadian government

(Natural News) Not long after newly elected Alberta (Canada) Premier Danielle Smith assumed her post, she openly advocated for unvaccinated Canadians, whom she described as the “most discriminated against group that I’ve ever witnessed in my life.” At a recent event, Smith also apologized for what unvaccinated Canadians faced for the past nearly three years due to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic tyranny.

Smith was asked about her campaign promise to both apologize to and seek justice for unvaccinated Albertans who were prosecuted or otherwise persecuted for their decision to maintain natural immunity while the rest of the herd jumped headlong over the genetic cliff. Smith responded by stating (watch below):

“I’m deeply sorry for anyone who was inappropriately subjected to, um, discrimination as a result of their vaccine status. I’m deeply sorry for any government employee that was fired from their [sic] job because of their vaccine status. And I welcome them back if they want to come back.”

Alberta leader apologizes to the

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) October 24, 2022

The woman who originally asked the question went on to ask Smith if she is still planning to grant amnesty to all unvaccinated Albertans who were fined or put in prison for refusing to get injected with Fauci Flu chemicals, to which Smith responded:

“As for the amnesty, I’d have to get some legal advice on that. Um, and so I’ve already asked my staff to, um, to request that advice so I can see how we would be able to proceed on that. My view has been that, um, these were political decisions that were made, and so I think that we need political decisions to offer a reversal.”

“But I do still want to get some legal advice on that first.”

Concerning a timeline for such amnesty to take place, Smith suggested that she is eager to “do it at the earliest opportunity” and is “hoping within the next week that I’ll get that advice.”


An apology won’t cut it: there needs to be JUSTICE served to plandemic perpetrators

As promising as Smith’s words sound, it cannot be overstated that simply saying sorry for a multi-year terror campaign that destroyed millions of people lives does not constitute justice.

While Smith may not be personally responsible for what took place, her apology fails to address what will become of the politicians who inflicted this mass genocide on Canadians in the first place.

Will Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ever be held accountable for his crimes against humanity? Does Smith have any ability to sway other politicians like herself to launch an investigation into such matters, the goal being to dole out punishment for the scamdemic criminals.

One Twitter user put it like this in response to Smith’s apology and promise of amnesty for the persecuted:

“There ya go, kids: Big Pharma and your government find it better to ask for forgiveness than ask for your permission.”

Another was a little more gracious, calling Smith’s sentiments “a start” and adding that “all leaders should be doing this.”

“I guess she thinks by just saying she’s sorry that’ll make up for everything,” wrote another who is not so forgiving. “I hate to tell these people but they’re wrong.”

Several others were encouraged that a politician would apologize at all, even if it does not end up achieving true justice.

“It takes a lot for any politician, party, or side to apologize these days,” one of them wrote. “What Smith is doing is awesome and I’m sure she will get a lot of backlash for it.”

The covid scamdemic continues to crumble. To keep up with the latest, visit

Sources for this article include:

41-year-old Florida Democrat candidate DIES inexplicably while walking his dog after BLASTING health advocates for not getting same Fauci Flu jab he had just got

Image: 41-year-old Florida Democrat candidate DIES inexplicably while walking his dog after BLASTING health advocates for not getting same Fauci Flu jab he had just got

(Natural News) Seemingly, the most dangerous risk a human being can take after getting a Fauci Flu jab is bad-mouthing everyone who chooses not to get one. This would be the case, as we’ve seen it happen to many folks, with a 41-year-young progressive Democrat candidate, Richard Allen Rowe, who told the world he does not “give a f##k” what happens to “anti-vaxxers” and he hopes Darwin does his work in killing us all off. Then he dropped dead while walking his dog. Coincidence? Maybe so, but it’s happening time and time again to these pro-vax-fanatics who brag and boast about their spike-protein-prion injections, then drop dead from SADS (sudden adult death syndrome), a.k.a. the clot shot effect.

The latest Democrat vaccine fanatic mocked and scolded the fully unvaccinated masses for helping to “kill 700,000 Americans” and then died a few short months after getting the shot. We’ve seen body builders, newscasters, and politicians alike die from “unexplainable causes” shortly after getting shot up with millions of spike proteins in the nano-bot-clot shots, ironically WHILE telling the world of non-vaxxers they are going to die and kill people for not getting the deadly jabs themselves.

Nano-bot-clot-shot may have killed pro-vaccine fanatic while he accused the fully unvaccinated of being the biggest threat to the world

Democrat vax-fanatic and truck driver Richard Rowe went and got his first Pfizer jab this August and thought he was gaining protection from the gain-of-function flu, when in actuality he may have committed involuntary suicide in the face of it all. Well, you can’t catch or spread Covid if you’re dead, so in that sense, the clot shot worked. Survival of the fittest would then mean that avoiding the clot shot would be your best chance at surviving the pandemic.


Here’s the Democrat vax-fanatic blowing up social media post-Pfizer-stab and before he croaked while walking his dog:

“Let me be real clear….I do not give a F##K what happens to anti-vaxxers. I don’t. Let Darwin do his work. They helped kill 700,000 Americans. I do not have the pity or tears to spare for any of them. It’s all dried up now. Sorry. At this point. I’m just hoping they feel 1/10th of the pain they’ve caused everyone else. The kids will be fine. THEY’RE going to suffer. And I f##king well think they’ve earned it.”

Covid Democrat and vax and mask fanatic dies after saying everyone who doesn’t vax up or mask up deserves to die

Pro-jab-fanatic and Democrat candidate for office, Richard Rowe, plastered social media with hate speech about non-vaxxers, but was never banned, barred, censored, or booted off Twitter, Fakebook, Instagram, or any of the other Far Left extremist social hate platforms, because he’s not conservative or going against the narratives. Simple as that.

Strange how these vaccine fanatics who voice their anger and vicious slams at the fully unvaccinated millions end up suffering inexplicable death shortly after (or during) the Wuhan flu shots.

Maybe mainstream media “MSM” will blame some random referee whistle that might have been blown in the vicinity of Rowe dropping dead while walking his dog, or maybe Rowe took a nice cold shower first and that made his heart fluctuate so badly that it just stopped working altogether. We’ve seen those stories scattered and splattered all over fake news as of late.

Maybe Rowe had so much hatred for the fully unvaccinated that the hatred itself caused his heart to stop working or a blood vessel in his brain to pop and give him a stroke. Nobody knows what really caused his death, yet, but maybe an embalmer or coroner will find those strange rubbery long clots made of heavy metals in his blood and reveal the real culprit. Only time and an honest autopsy will tell.

Bookmark to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental “vaccines” that cause blood clots, myocarditis, and severe, chronic inflammation.

Sources for this article include:

Sources: Ukrainian government planning nuclear 'dirty bomb' false flag to blame on Russia

Image: Sources: Ukrainian government planning nuclear ‘dirty bomb’ false flag to blame on Russia

(Natural News) Sources say that the Ukrainian leadership is planning a diabolical false flag attack using a nuclear “dirty bomb” so they can blame it on Russia and possibly widen the conflict there to include NATO and other countries.

According to Sputnik, dirty bombs, which are also known as “radiological dispersal device,” or RDD, mixes conventional explosives with radioactive materials and typically utilizes dynamite and other explosives to spread radiological dust and smoke over a wide area, causing radioactive contamination and, eventually, sickness and death.

Sources told the news agency that the reason behind the shocking attack is to accuse the Russian government of using weapons of mass destruction and trigger an anti-Moscow global campaign aimed at, eventually, toppling President Vladimir Putin’s regime.

According to the insiders, the administration of the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant located in the town of Zholtye Vody in Ukraine’s Dnepropetrovsk region, as well as the Kiev Institute for Nuclear Research, was tasked with making the ‘dirty bomb,’ a process that the sources said is being overseen by Kiev’s Western curators,” Sputnik noted further.

The insiders added that the organizers of the provocation hope that the “nuclear incident” will prompt an extremely negative reaction from the international community, and that Moscow will lose the support of many of its key partners.

Meanwhile, the West will again try to raise the issue of depriving Russia the status of a permanent member of the UN Security Council and ramp up its anti-Russian rhetoric, according to the sources.


These claims come on the heels of a Russian Foreign Ministry statement last week reiterating that Moscow does not threaten the first use of nuclear weapons, adding that the West typically uses nuclear rhetoric as a means of trying to portray Russia as being on the brink of triggering global annihilation using weapons of mass destruction.

Earlier this month, Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for Putin’s government, pressed the global community to recall Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s recent urging for a nuclear strike against Russia as a preventative measure. He also criticized Western governments for failing to vociferously condemn the remarks.

“There were some timid attempts, let’s say, to condemn Zelensky’s tone. We heard at the United Nations and so on. But to our regret, let’s say, it didn’t occur to anyone to rein in their vassal. This is very dangerous,” he said.

Konstantin Vorontsov, a deputy director of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s department for arms nonproliferation and control, emphasized that the Kremlin will be monitoring the reaction of Kyiv’s Western sponsons to Zelensky’s “completely inadequate and absolutely unacceptable” words.

“I urge all [UN] delegates to go to the site where this interview is posted in Ukrainian and listen to what President Zelensky said in the original video. You will see that he wasn’t talking about some kind of preventive sanctions before February 24, mythical ones that the presidential press service invents, but it was clearly about the need for preventive nuclear strikes by NATO nations against Russia,” he said.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that Kyiv was creating unnecessary risks regarding the use of weapons of mass destruction with its rhetoric.

Zelensky’s appeal “only testifies to the threats emanating from the Kyiv regime,” and the entire purpose of the invasion was to eliminate such threats, he noted further.

“As you know, a council of the so-called European community was convened yesterday, it was an initiative of [French] President [Emmanuel] Macron, following which EU diplomacy chief [Josep] Borrell announced — proudly — that a process was beginning to form a security structure without Russia’s participation. In general, they simply dance to the tune of Kiev and encourage the crazy fantasies of those who are still in power there,” Lavrov said.

Sources include:

Mark Kelly EXPOSED by Project Veritas; lying to voters and “playing both sides”

Image: Mark Kelly EXPOSED by Project Veritas; lying to voters and “playing both sides”

(Natural News) In an attempt to swipe more votes from independent and Republican voters, Arizona Democratic Senate candidate Mark Kelly’s campaign field organizer admitted to lying about the political hopeful’s positions.

Undercover video footage – watch below – shows Evynn Bronson from Kelly’s “Mission for Arizona” campaign openly admitting that deceit and lies are being used to try to win the election for Kelly.

“What if I came across a Republican, and they, like, ask me if Mark Kelly is pro-life?” the undercover Project Veritas journalist asked Bronson.

“Yes,” Bronson immediately responded. “I would say, ‘Mark Kelly is pro-life but also pro-keeping the government out of our healthcare.’ I don’t know, something stupid like that.”

“Even though he’s not pro-life?” the undercover journalist then responded.

“Absolutely he is not pro-life,” Bronson retorted. “And then I’d go to something like, ‘you know after his wife was in a shooting, [Kelly] values life so much.’ It’s just a shame.”

If Arizona voters knew just how liberal Mark Kelly really is, most would never dream of voting for him

Bronson would go on during the conversation to admit that Kelly is too far-left to win the election with honesty. His extreme positions would “scare away a lot of those independents,” he admitted.

“And that’s 40 percent,” Bronson then added, noting that Kelly “can’t win with just Democrat votes” so “he has to play both sides.”


Right now, Bronson says, about 40 percent of Arizona voters are undecided about whether they are going to vote Republican or Democrat this election. This would seem to be a very sizeable question mark for the outcome of the election, which is why the Kelly campaign is resorting to dirty tactics.

Kelly cannot just come right out and admit to all the “very liberal” policies that he actually has in store for Arizona, Bronson further admitted, “even though you think he’s going to do them anyways.”

“He’s not going to say anything outright about what he’s going to do unless it will garner support from Independents and some of the moderate Republicans,” Bronson further said. (Related: Last year, Project Veritas got a Pfizer official to admit that Fauci Flu shots [covid ‘vaccines’] contain ingredients made from aborted babies.)

Without those independent votes, Kelly simply does not have a chance of winning a Senate seat in Arizona – at least not without massive voter fraud, which after what we saw in 2020 is not necessarily out of the question.

As for dealing with Republican voters, Bronson said he has to be extra careful not to suggest in any way that Kelly is pro-abortion, “even though he is.”

Mission for Arizona’s Twitter account specifically states that the group’s ultimate goal is to “elect Democrats up and down the ballot” with a specific “mission to re-elect [Mark Kelly].”

It is clear, at this point, that this effort includes spreading bald-faced lies and whatever else it takes to convince undecided voters that Kelly is a better choice than his Republican opponent, Blake Masters, who Bronson says “believes that the election was a fraud.”

Bronson called Masters’ position as “crazy, crazy, crazy far-right conspiracy as you can get.”

“So, it’s just like, look at the alternatives and they’re not super beautiful,” Bronson added about Kelly’s opponents.

“They all have a public position and a private position like Hillary said,” wrote someone in the comments about the political class and how they all behave. “Which translates to, they are con men who see nothing wrong with lying to you about anything and everything.”

If you enjoyed reading this story, you will find many others like it at

Sources for this article include: