New premier of Alberta apologizes to the unvaccinated, says they never should have been abused by Canadian government

Image: New premier of Alberta apologizes to the unvaccinated, says they never should have been abused by Canadian government

(Natural News) Not long after newly elected Alberta (Canada) Premier Danielle Smith assumed her post, she openly advocated for unvaccinated Canadians, whom she described as the “most discriminated against group that I’ve ever witnessed in my life.” At a recent event, Smith also apologized for what unvaccinated Canadians faced for the past nearly three years due to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic tyranny.

Smith was asked about her campaign promise to both apologize to and seek justice for unvaccinated Albertans who were prosecuted or otherwise persecuted for their decision to maintain natural immunity while the rest of the herd jumped headlong over the genetic cliff. Smith responded by stating (watch below):

“I’m deeply sorry for anyone who was inappropriately subjected to, um, discrimination as a result of their vaccine status. I’m deeply sorry for any government employee that was fired from their [sic] job because of their vaccine status. And I welcome them back if they want to come back.”

Alberta leader apologizes to the

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) October 24, 2022

The woman who originally asked the question went on to ask Smith if she is still planning to grant amnesty to all unvaccinated Albertans who were fined or put in prison for refusing to get injected with Fauci Flu chemicals, to which Smith responded:

“As for the amnesty, I’d have to get some legal advice on that. Um, and so I’ve already asked my staff to, um, to request that advice so I can see how we would be able to proceed on that. My view has been that, um, these were political decisions that were made, and so I think that we need political decisions to offer a reversal.”

“But I do still want to get some legal advice on that first.”

Concerning a timeline for such amnesty to take place, Smith suggested that she is eager to “do it at the earliest opportunity” and is “hoping within the next week that I’ll get that advice.”


An apology won’t cut it: there needs to be JUSTICE served to plandemic perpetrators

As promising as Smith’s words sound, it cannot be overstated that simply saying sorry for a multi-year terror campaign that destroyed millions of people lives does not constitute justice.

While Smith may not be personally responsible for what took place, her apology fails to address what will become of the politicians who inflicted this mass genocide on Canadians in the first place.

Will Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ever be held accountable for his crimes against humanity? Does Smith have any ability to sway other politicians like herself to launch an investigation into such matters, the goal being to dole out punishment for the scamdemic criminals.

One Twitter user put it like this in response to Smith’s apology and promise of amnesty for the persecuted:

“There ya go, kids: Big Pharma and your government find it better to ask for forgiveness than ask for your permission.”

Another was a little more gracious, calling Smith’s sentiments “a start” and adding that “all leaders should be doing this.”

“I guess she thinks by just saying she’s sorry that’ll make up for everything,” wrote another who is not so forgiving. “I hate to tell these people but they’re wrong.”

Several others were encouraged that a politician would apologize at all, even if it does not end up achieving true justice.

“It takes a lot for any politician, party, or side to apologize these days,” one of them wrote. “What Smith is doing is awesome and I’m sure she will get a lot of backlash for it.”

The covid scamdemic continues to crumble. To keep up with the latest, visit

Sources for this article include:

41-year-old Florida Democrat candidate DIES inexplicably while walking his dog after BLASTING health advocates for not getting same Fauci Flu jab he had just got

Image: 41-year-old Florida Democrat candidate DIES inexplicably while walking his dog after BLASTING health advocates for not getting same Fauci Flu jab he had just got

(Natural News) Seemingly, the most dangerous risk a human being can take after getting a Fauci Flu jab is bad-mouthing everyone who chooses not to get one. This would be the case, as we’ve seen it happen to many folks, with a 41-year-young progressive Democrat candidate, Richard Allen Rowe, who told the world he does not “give a f##k” what happens to “anti-vaxxers” and he hopes Darwin does his work in killing us all off. Then he dropped dead while walking his dog. Coincidence? Maybe so, but it’s happening time and time again to these pro-vax-fanatics who brag and boast about their spike-protein-prion injections, then drop dead from SADS (sudden adult death syndrome), a.k.a. the clot shot effect.

The latest Democrat vaccine fanatic mocked and scolded the fully unvaccinated masses for helping to “kill 700,000 Americans” and then died a few short months after getting the shot. We’ve seen body builders, newscasters, and politicians alike die from “unexplainable causes” shortly after getting shot up with millions of spike proteins in the nano-bot-clot shots, ironically WHILE telling the world of non-vaxxers they are going to die and kill people for not getting the deadly jabs themselves.

Nano-bot-clot-shot may have killed pro-vaccine fanatic while he accused the fully unvaccinated of being the biggest threat to the world

Democrat vax-fanatic and truck driver Richard Rowe went and got his first Pfizer jab this August and thought he was gaining protection from the gain-of-function flu, when in actuality he may have committed involuntary suicide in the face of it all. Well, you can’t catch or spread Covid if you’re dead, so in that sense, the clot shot worked. Survival of the fittest would then mean that avoiding the clot shot would be your best chance at surviving the pandemic.


Here’s the Democrat vax-fanatic blowing up social media post-Pfizer-stab and before he croaked while walking his dog:

“Let me be real clear….I do not give a F##K what happens to anti-vaxxers. I don’t. Let Darwin do his work. They helped kill 700,000 Americans. I do not have the pity or tears to spare for any of them. It’s all dried up now. Sorry. At this point. I’m just hoping they feel 1/10th of the pain they’ve caused everyone else. The kids will be fine. THEY’RE going to suffer. And I f##king well think they’ve earned it.”

Covid Democrat and vax and mask fanatic dies after saying everyone who doesn’t vax up or mask up deserves to die

Pro-jab-fanatic and Democrat candidate for office, Richard Rowe, plastered social media with hate speech about non-vaxxers, but was never banned, barred, censored, or booted off Twitter, Fakebook, Instagram, or any of the other Far Left extremist social hate platforms, because he’s not conservative or going against the narratives. Simple as that.

Strange how these vaccine fanatics who voice their anger and vicious slams at the fully unvaccinated millions end up suffering inexplicable death shortly after (or during) the Wuhan flu shots.

Maybe mainstream media “MSM” will blame some random referee whistle that might have been blown in the vicinity of Rowe dropping dead while walking his dog, or maybe Rowe took a nice cold shower first and that made his heart fluctuate so badly that it just stopped working altogether. We’ve seen those stories scattered and splattered all over fake news as of late.

Maybe Rowe had so much hatred for the fully unvaccinated that the hatred itself caused his heart to stop working or a blood vessel in his brain to pop and give him a stroke. Nobody knows what really caused his death, yet, but maybe an embalmer or coroner will find those strange rubbery long clots made of heavy metals in his blood and reveal the real culprit. Only time and an honest autopsy will tell.

Bookmark to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental “vaccines” that cause blood clots, myocarditis, and severe, chronic inflammation.

Sources for this article include:

Sources: Ukrainian government planning nuclear 'dirty bomb' false flag to blame on Russia

Image: Sources: Ukrainian government planning nuclear ‘dirty bomb’ false flag to blame on Russia

(Natural News) Sources say that the Ukrainian leadership is planning a diabolical false flag attack using a nuclear “dirty bomb” so they can blame it on Russia and possibly widen the conflict there to include NATO and other countries.

According to Sputnik, dirty bombs, which are also known as “radiological dispersal device,” or RDD, mixes conventional explosives with radioactive materials and typically utilizes dynamite and other explosives to spread radiological dust and smoke over a wide area, causing radioactive contamination and, eventually, sickness and death.

Sources told the news agency that the reason behind the shocking attack is to accuse the Russian government of using weapons of mass destruction and trigger an anti-Moscow global campaign aimed at, eventually, toppling President Vladimir Putin’s regime.

According to the insiders, the administration of the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant located in the town of Zholtye Vody in Ukraine’s Dnepropetrovsk region, as well as the Kiev Institute for Nuclear Research, was tasked with making the ‘dirty bomb,’ a process that the sources said is being overseen by Kiev’s Western curators,” Sputnik noted further.

The insiders added that the organizers of the provocation hope that the “nuclear incident” will prompt an extremely negative reaction from the international community, and that Moscow will lose the support of many of its key partners.

Meanwhile, the West will again try to raise the issue of depriving Russia the status of a permanent member of the UN Security Council and ramp up its anti-Russian rhetoric, according to the sources.


These claims come on the heels of a Russian Foreign Ministry statement last week reiterating that Moscow does not threaten the first use of nuclear weapons, adding that the West typically uses nuclear rhetoric as a means of trying to portray Russia as being on the brink of triggering global annihilation using weapons of mass destruction.

Earlier this month, Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for Putin’s government, pressed the global community to recall Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s recent urging for a nuclear strike against Russia as a preventative measure. He also criticized Western governments for failing to vociferously condemn the remarks.

“There were some timid attempts, let’s say, to condemn Zelensky’s tone. We heard at the United Nations and so on. But to our regret, let’s say, it didn’t occur to anyone to rein in their vassal. This is very dangerous,” he said.

Konstantin Vorontsov, a deputy director of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s department for arms nonproliferation and control, emphasized that the Kremlin will be monitoring the reaction of Kyiv’s Western sponsons to Zelensky’s “completely inadequate and absolutely unacceptable” words.

“I urge all [UN] delegates to go to the site where this interview is posted in Ukrainian and listen to what President Zelensky said in the original video. You will see that he wasn’t talking about some kind of preventive sanctions before February 24, mythical ones that the presidential press service invents, but it was clearly about the need for preventive nuclear strikes by NATO nations against Russia,” he said.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that Kyiv was creating unnecessary risks regarding the use of weapons of mass destruction with its rhetoric.

Zelensky’s appeal “only testifies to the threats emanating from the Kyiv regime,” and the entire purpose of the invasion was to eliminate such threats, he noted further.

“As you know, a council of the so-called European community was convened yesterday, it was an initiative of [French] President [Emmanuel] Macron, following which EU diplomacy chief [Josep] Borrell announced — proudly — that a process was beginning to form a security structure without Russia’s participation. In general, they simply dance to the tune of Kiev and encourage the crazy fantasies of those who are still in power there,” Lavrov said.

Sources include:

Mark Kelly EXPOSED by Project Veritas; lying to voters and “playing both sides”

Image: Mark Kelly EXPOSED by Project Veritas; lying to voters and “playing both sides”

(Natural News) In an attempt to swipe more votes from independent and Republican voters, Arizona Democratic Senate candidate Mark Kelly’s campaign field organizer admitted to lying about the political hopeful’s positions.

Undercover video footage – watch below – shows Evynn Bronson from Kelly’s “Mission for Arizona” campaign openly admitting that deceit and lies are being used to try to win the election for Kelly.

“What if I came across a Republican, and they, like, ask me if Mark Kelly is pro-life?” the undercover Project Veritas journalist asked Bronson.

“Yes,” Bronson immediately responded. “I would say, ‘Mark Kelly is pro-life but also pro-keeping the government out of our healthcare.’ I don’t know, something stupid like that.”

“Even though he’s not pro-life?” the undercover journalist then responded.

“Absolutely he is not pro-life,” Bronson retorted. “And then I’d go to something like, ‘you know after his wife was in a shooting, [Kelly] values life so much.’ It’s just a shame.”

If Arizona voters knew just how liberal Mark Kelly really is, most would never dream of voting for him

Bronson would go on during the conversation to admit that Kelly is too far-left to win the election with honesty. His extreme positions would “scare away a lot of those independents,” he admitted.

“And that’s 40 percent,” Bronson then added, noting that Kelly “can’t win with just Democrat votes” so “he has to play both sides.”


Right now, Bronson says, about 40 percent of Arizona voters are undecided about whether they are going to vote Republican or Democrat this election. This would seem to be a very sizeable question mark for the outcome of the election, which is why the Kelly campaign is resorting to dirty tactics.

Kelly cannot just come right out and admit to all the “very liberal” policies that he actually has in store for Arizona, Bronson further admitted, “even though you think he’s going to do them anyways.”

“He’s not going to say anything outright about what he’s going to do unless it will garner support from Independents and some of the moderate Republicans,” Bronson further said. (Related: Last year, Project Veritas got a Pfizer official to admit that Fauci Flu shots [covid ‘vaccines’] contain ingredients made from aborted babies.)

Without those independent votes, Kelly simply does not have a chance of winning a Senate seat in Arizona – at least not without massive voter fraud, which after what we saw in 2020 is not necessarily out of the question.

As for dealing with Republican voters, Bronson said he has to be extra careful not to suggest in any way that Kelly is pro-abortion, “even though he is.”

Mission for Arizona’s Twitter account specifically states that the group’s ultimate goal is to “elect Democrats up and down the ballot” with a specific “mission to re-elect [Mark Kelly].”

It is clear, at this point, that this effort includes spreading bald-faced lies and whatever else it takes to convince undecided voters that Kelly is a better choice than his Republican opponent, Blake Masters, who Bronson says “believes that the election was a fraud.”

Bronson called Masters’ position as “crazy, crazy, crazy far-right conspiracy as you can get.”

“So, it’s just like, look at the alternatives and they’re not super beautiful,” Bronson added about Kelly’s opponents.

“They all have a public position and a private position like Hillary said,” wrote someone in the comments about the political class and how they all behave. “Which translates to, they are con men who see nothing wrong with lying to you about anything and everything.”

If you enjoyed reading this story, you will find many others like it at

Sources for this article include:

House 'progressives' immediately cave to warmongering Dems after urging Biden to seek negotiated settlement between Russia, Ukraine

Image: House ‘progressives’ immediately cave to warmongering Dems after urging Biden to seek negotiated settlement between Russia, Ukraine

(Natural News) Not long ago, the vast majority of congressional Democrats and their propagandists in the ‘mainstream’ media claimed that electing Donald Trump to the presidency would lead to “nuclear war” and global destruction.

But as usual, that was just more left-wing projection since Marxist Democrats always accuse their political opponents of what they do.

It turned out that Trump became the “peace president.” During his term, his administration brokered several historic peace deals between Israel and Arab rivals, as well as between historical enemies in eastern Europe. He made peaceful overtures to North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un and actually became the first U.S. president to meet with a North Korean leader since the end of the Korean War in 1953. And Trump wanted to reach out to Russian President Vladimir Putin, often saying on the campaign trail that having a mega-nuclear-armed Russia on our side instead of the side of our enemies was inherently in our best interests, but he could not because that plan was torpedoed by the deep state left with a phony “election collusion” narrative.

Now, those same deep-state Marxists have successfully beaten back the most liberal Democrats in the party after 30 of them signed a letter imploring The Installed One, Joe Biden, to find a negotiated settlement in the war between Russia and Ukraine before that conflict goes nuclear.

The Washington Post reported:

In the letter, the 30 Democrats led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, call on Biden to pair the unprecedented economic and military support the United States is providing Ukraine with a “proactive diplomatic push, redoubling efforts to seek a realistic framework for a cease fire.”


The Democrats are specifically concerned that the United States is not engaging in regular dialogue with Russia as part of its effort to end a protracted war that has caused thousands of deaths and displaced 13 million people. The Biden administration has been adamant that it is up to Kyiv whether and when to negotiate with Russia, arguing that Ukrainians as a free people should decide their fate.

“Let me be clear: we are united as Democrats in our unequivocal commitment to supporting Ukraine in their fight for their democracy and freedom in the face of the illegal and outrageous Russian invasion,” Jayapal said. “Diplomacy is an important tool that can save lives — but it is just one tool.

“The alternative to diplomacy is protracted war, with both its attendant certainties and catastrophic and unknowable risks,” the letter continued.

But less than 24 hours later, the group of progressives had been cowered into submitting to the deep-state anti-Russian war hawks in both parties — claiming that the letter was sent to the White House by mistake.

“The Congressional Progressive Caucus hereby withdraws its recent letter to the White House regarding Ukraine,” the retraction began.

“The letter was drafted several months ago, but unfortunately was released by staff without vetting. As Chair of the Caucus, I accept responsibility for this,” Jayapal wrote, before pivoting to blame Republicans because, of course.

“Because of the timing, our message is being conflated by some as being equivalent to the recent statement by Republican Leader McCarthy threatening an end to aid to Ukraine if Republicans take over,” she wrote. The proximity of these statements created the unfortunate appearance that Democrats, who have strongly and unanimously supported and voted for every package of military, strategic, and economic assistance to the Ukrainian people, are somehow aligned with Republicans who seek to pull the plug on American support for President Zelensky and the Ukrainian forces.”

Journalist Glenn Greenwald mocked Jayapal and her cowardly band of leftists online.

“They couldn’t even hold out for *24 hours*. What a complete humiliation. Joe Crowley must be sitting in his lobbyist office cackling each time this happens,” he tweeted, referencing the former New York Democrat who had a lead role in the party when he was defeated in a Democratic primary in 2018 by now-Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

They couldn’t even hold out for *24 hours*. What a complete humiliation. Joe Crowley must be sitting in his lobbyist office cackling each time this happens:

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 25, 2022

Sources include:

UK flips back to green cult as new prime minister cancels fracking order, setting country up for energy collapse

Image: UK flips back to green cult as new prime minister cancels fracking order, setting country up for energy collapse

(Natural News) The United Kingdom will continue to fail to reach its full economic potential, at the expense of its own people, thanks to one of the first decisions from the country’s new prime minister.

Though she did not last long in her position, outgoing PM Liz Truss did order a resumption in shale oil fracking that included offering households £1,000 each for allowing the practice in their neighborhoods.

According to the Financial Times, her successor – the new PM, World Economic Forum-sponsored Rishi Sunak, is reversing Truss’s order, and reinstating the fracking ban, meaning Sunak is forcing the UK back into the ‘green’ religion:

During his first prime minister’s questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday, the new UK prime minister told MPs that he “stands by” the Conservative party’s 2019 manifesto commitment that halted fracking. The moratorium was briefly lifted by Truss during her brief period as prime minister.

That manifesto, which came after a 2.9 earthquake was caused by private fracking firm Cuadrilla, says: “We placed a moratorium on fracking in England with immediate effect. Having listened to local communities, we have ruled out changes to the planning system. We will not support fracking unless the science shows categorically that it can be done safely.”

Following that, then-PM Boris Johnson’s government pronounced that it would ban all new fracking wells and the only active fracking site in the country at the time, in northwest England, would be shut down immediately.


As noted further by Zero Hedge:

Truss’s reversal was set to increase North Sea drilling, a renewed focus on accelerating offshore wind farms, a pre-announced £400 energy bill discount and the removal of green levies costing £150 – capping the typical household energy bill approximately £1,971.

Sunak, however, is still advocating for offshore wind plants “and more nuclear,” adding “that is what this government will deliver.”

UK NatGas production had been notably declining since 2000.

Sunak’s proclamation comes amid the resignation of Jacob Rees-Mogg on Tuesday, who is a fracking advocate that Truss placed in charge of the country’s energy strategy. Notably, he warned against “climate alarmism” and added that he wanted cheap, affordable energy for the British people “rather more than I would like them to have windmills.”

That led another greenie, Rebecca Newsom, head of political affairs for Greenpeace UK, to claim that Rees-Mogg is the “last person who should be in charge of the energy brief,” adding that “appointing him to the brief now suggests the Torries have learned nothing from some years of energy policy incompetence.”

But in fact, it’s the ‘green religion’ that has failed the UK in terms of energy policies, not fossil fuel advocates. There simply isn’t the technology available at present to completely remove fossil fuels from the energy production equation; countries can’t build windmills or construct enough solar panel farms (especially in cloudy UK) to power a first-world economy, as the rest of Europe has demonstrated.

For that matter, the ‘climate change’ lunatics have even managed to kill off nuclear energy, which has been around for more than a half-century and literally produces zero emissions (leading critics of their movement to believe they’re not really interested in clean air as much as they are interested in control).

Worse, left-wing leaders in EU countries are hypocrites and stupid. While they forced their own countries to give up producing cheap, accessible, and yes, clean-burning fossil fuels, they became more reliant on Russian fossil fuels, a nation they were supposed to be defending against per their membership in NATO.

All in all, the head-long plunge into unreliable and expensive ‘green energy’ was foolish, ill-planned, and based entirely on an unproven premise: That SUVs and cattle flatulence are causing the earth’s climate to change.

Sources include: