Day: November 1, 2022

By: Corey Lynn | This article was originally published here.

• 76 International organizations and banks enjoy immunities, privileges, and tax exemptions

• GAVI, Big Pharma, and CERN enjoy similar immunities

• The Bank for International Settlements has sovereign immunity and some of these immunities extend to its members, being 63 central banks and the Federal Reserve System, while other immunities extend to “systemically important institutions”

• Trillions of taxpayer dollars and printed money has moved through these organizations and banks with no transparency or accountability as they continue to build a global enslavement system

• Hundreds, if not thousands, of NGOs and corporations work with and through these organizations and banks, some of whom have agreements, NDAs, and/or immunity by extension

A band of criminals got together a century ago and decided they were going to own the world, hold all of the power, create and hoard all of the money, and keep everyone on a constant spin cycle to fool them.

Not only were they going to construct it as they saw fit, but they were going to build the most elaborate enslavement system this world has ever seen – one that gives them full immunity, allows them to operate outside the law entirely, and they were going to do it without anyone realizing it until it was too late.

These self-imposed “rulers” believe themselves to be untouchable, have created documents stating as much, and are laughing at humanity as people move about their lives unaware of this elaborate scheme.

This is the story that needs to be shared with the world and with every state legislator who should move immediately to create independence from the Federal Reserve system and Central Banks, and enforce our Constitution and financial management laws to protect sovereignty at the state and local level.

This should include steps to recapture monies illegally stolen, to prevent current and future illegal expenditure of our tax monies and to end sovereign immunity privileges that have been used to engage in systematic criminal activities and racketeering. They do not operate above the law, they operate entirely outside of the law.

This dualistic world they have created goes far beyond what most have imagined. It’s not so much that these individuals and organizations are “above the law,” as it is that they are operating entirely outside of the law, and have granted themselves permission to do so by executive orders, treaties, and the creation of BIS. The structure they have created is much like a pyramid scheme in a sense.

At the top of the ivory tower, sit BIS, the Bank for International Settlements, with sovereign immunity. When carrying out specific activities under BIS, this immunity extends to its members, which is made up of 63 global central banks and monetary authorities, the Federal Reserve System, plus insurers, and payment systems through their subsidiary, that BIS deems “systemically important institutions.”

As if that’s not bad enough, it gets worse. The U.S. has given 76 public international organizations immunities, privileges, and tax exemptions dating back to 1946, just 10 years after BIS expanded its immunities with The Hague Convention of 1936. In addition, some of these organizations have added immunities through treaties.

Underneath that layer, there are hundreds of NGOs, corporations, and universities that operate with and through these international organizations who hold immunities and privileges – some of whom have signed agreements and NDAs, others have been given immunity by extension.

The process is quite simple. The money essentially gets laundered through the organizations and banks which have little level of transparency or accountability, and spread across multiple countries, making it that much easier to achieve.

But it doesn’t end there. In addition to immunities enjoyed by these banks and organizations, Bill Gates’ GAVI also enjoys immunities and privileges. Of course, the World Bank serves on the board, manages their finances, and is the trustee, who enjoys an extensive amount of immunities and privileges to all five arms of the World Bank Group.

Couple that with the release of liability to big pharma when it comes to vaccines, and this is a recipe for disaster. Even CERN holds international immunity status, separately from the lists provided in this report.

At the bottom of this pyramid are civilians who pay in taxes, abide by a set of laws that the others never have to concern themselves with, and who have naively believed that these organizations and banks are operating in their best interest, while they squander away trillions of dollars to build a human enslavement system, and big Gov funnels them taxpayer dollars. This is how they’ve managed to do it for so long, without fear or conscience.

What’s important to recognize about these specific organizations, is the fact that they cover nearly every industry. In other words – those behind these organizations and banks are the future rulers of the world if they are not stopped. Their framework is already in place.

What must be done to stop this band of criminal characters who masterminded how to create special privileges for themselves, outside of the system, signed some pieces of paper, and declared they have immunity to steal people’s hard-earned money?

Almost immediately after World War II, Congress passed the International Organizations Immunities Act, which was signed into law on December 29, 1945. This established immunities, privileges, and tax exemptions for international organizations that might not be considered international organizations under the rules of international laws, such as the Global Fund, for example.

What defines a qualifying “international organization”? The IOIA states: “For the purposes of this title, the term “international organization” means a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation …”

Once the IOIA was passed, it was by the authorization of the President(s) to grant these privileges to international organizations by executive order. The President also has the authority to condition, limit, or revoke the designation. Whereas, there have been a few that received limited privileges, there does not seem to be any that have been revoked, with exception of organizations that dissolved.

However, in 1983 President Ronald Reagan extended additional immunities from lawsuits and prosecution to Interpol, and in 2009, President Barack Obama granted additional benefits.

The IOIA states that “International organizations … shall enjoy the same immunity from suit and every form of judicial process as is enjoyed by foreign governments, except to the extent that such organizations may expressly waive their immunity.” This gave them absolute immunity. In 1976, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act was passed which created some restrictions on immunities, but the IOIA seemed to have remained vague on the matter.

When it comes to immunities and privileges, there are countries who grant them to international organizations under their own criteria and rules, there are headquarters agreements that provide additional immunities and privileges, and there are international treaties that also grant immunities and privileges.

A single organization could have one, two, or all three at the same time. As an example, the Global Fund has privileges by the U.S., and international treaties with multiple countries, while having additional immunities in Switzerland, including a headquarters agreement. In other words, they are protected to the hilt.

Note that in this Act, as well as treaties, they often say, “unless immunity is waived,” and what they mean by that is that the internal heads of the organization determine whether they wish to waive immunity so that a particular legal case may see the light of day in court, outside of the organization using its internal council for any such debates or legal action.

Unless something so outrageous happened, such as an employee murdering another employee, it would be unlikely that any organization would waive their immunity rights to settle disputes on their own.

This is a cliff note summary of their ability to operate outside the law. The full version of the IOIA can be reviewed in detail via the original Act signed into law, Yale Law School, or for more background visit Wikipedia.

• International organizations, their property and their assets, wherever located, and by whomsoever held, shall enjoy the same immunity from suit and every form of judicial process as is enjoyed by foreign governments, unless the organization waives their immunity

• Immunity from search and seizure of property and assets, wherever located, and by whomsoever held

• Archives are inviolable

• Exemption from property taxes, internal revenue taxes, communication taxes, taxes on transportation of persons or property, customs duties and taxes

• Admission of officers and employees, and their family members, without checks from customs

• Officers and employees are exempt from legal suits or any other legal action in regards to activities related to work

• Employees are exempt from income tax, if they are not U.S. citizens, or are both a U.S. citizen and a citizen of the Commonwealth of the Philippines

• Officers and employees of the international organization, and members of their immediate families, other than nationals of the United States, require no alien registration or fingerprinting, or registration of foreign agents

• If the Secretary of State determines that the continued presence of a person from an international organization, in the United States, is no longer desirable, or if the Secretary of State wishes to withdraw the privileges, exemptions, and immunities of the international organization itself, they have the power to do so

The list below is in the order in which the immunities were first given to these organizations. As anyone can see, Truman was instrumental in kicking this off with 20 designations, and Bill Clinton holds second place. Since President Truman, every president thereafter issued immunities to various organizations, with the exception of President Trump, and thus far, Biden.

This is a comprehensive list that includes the organization, date it was founded, headquarters, the dates they were given immunity and by whom, and the executive order numbers that correspond, which have been rigorously checked. Also note that some of these organizations also have treaties that give them additional immunities and privileges, such as the UN. This will be covered further in part 2.

• Organization of American States (formerly the Pan American Union)
  
  Founded: 1890 (the charter was officially created on April 30, 1948)
  
  Headquarters: Washington D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9698 on February 19, 1946 by Harry S. Truman and EO 10533 on June 3, 1954 by Dwight D. Eisenhower

• International Labor Organization (founded under League of Nations, now part of UN)
  
  Founded: October, 1919
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9698 on February 19, 1946 – Harry S. Truman

• Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations
  
  Founded: October 16, 1945
  
  Headquarters: Rome, Italy
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9698 on February 19, 1946 – Harry S. Truman

• United Nations
  
  Founded: October 24, 1945
  
  Headquarters: New York
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9698 on February 19, 1946 – Harry S. Truman

• Pan American Health Organization (previously Pan American Sanitary Bureau)
  
  Founded: December 2, 1902
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9751 on July 11, 1946, and EO 10025 on December 30, 1948 by Harry S. Truman, and EO 10864 on February 18, 1960 by Dwight D. Eisenhower

• Inter-American Statistical Institute
  
  Founded: May 12, 1940
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9751 on July 11, 1946, and EO 10025 on December 30, 1948 by Harry S. Truman, and EO 10864 on February 18, 1960 by Dwight D. Eisenhower

• Inter-American Institute for Cooperation for Agriculture (formerly the Inter-American Institute for Agricultural Sciences)
  
  Founded: 1942
  
  Headquarters: San Jose, Costa Rica
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9751 on July 11, 1946 – Harry S. Truman

• International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank)
  
  Founded: July, 1944 (opened their door on June 25, 1946)
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9751 on July 11, 1946 – Harry S. Truman

• International Monetary Fund (UN)
  
  Founded: July, 1944
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9751 on July 11, 1946 – Harry S. Truman

• International Wheat Advisory Committee (International Wheat Council)
  
  Founded: 1933
  
  Headquarters: London, England
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9823 on January 24, 1947 – Harry S. Truman

• International Telecommunication Union (est as International Telegraph Union, now under UN)
  
  Founded: May 17, 1865
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9863 on May 31, 1947 – Harry S. Truman

• United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) – UN
  
  Founded: November 16, 1945
  
  Headquarters: Paris, France
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9863 on May 31, 1947 – Harry S. Truman

• International Civil Aviation Organization (UN)
  
  Founded: April 4, 1947
  
  Headquarters: Montreal, Canada
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9863 on May 31, 1947 – Harry S. Truman

• International Cotton Advisory Committee
  
  Founded: 1939
  
  Headquarters: Washington DC
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9911 on December 19, 1947 – Harry S. Truman

• International Joint Commission – United States & Canada
  
  Founded: 1909
  
  Headquarters: Ottawa, ON and Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 9972 on June 25, 1948 – Harry S. Truman

• World Health Organization (UN)
  
  Founded: April 7, 1948
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10025 on December 30, 1948 – Harry S. Truman

• Pacific Community (formerly the South Pacific Commission)
  
  Founded: 1947
  
  Headquarters: Noumea, New Caledonia
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10086 on November 25, 1949 – Harry S. Truman

• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) – (formerly the Organization for European Economic Cooperation)
  
  Founded: April 16, 1948 (changed to OECD on September 30, 1961)
  
  Headquarters: Paris, France
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10133 on June 27, 1950 – Harry S. Truman

• Inter-American Defense Board
  
  Founded: January, 1942
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10228 on March 26, 1951 – Harry S. Truman

• International Organization for Migration (formerly Provisional Intergovernmental Committee for the Movement of Migrants for Europe and Intergovernmental Committee for European Migration)
  
  Founded: December 6, 1951
  
  Headquarters: Grand-Saconnex, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10335 on March 28, 1952 – Harry S. Truman

• International Finance Corporation (under World Bank)
  
  Founded: July 20, 1956
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10680 on October 2, 1956 – Dwight D. Eisenhower

• Universal Postal Union (established by Treaty of Bern, now under UN)
  
  Founded: October 9, 1874
  
  Headquarters: Bern, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10727 on August 31, 1957 – Dwight D. Eisenhower

• International Atomic Energy Agency (UN)
  
  Founded: July 29, 1957
  
  Headquarters: Vienna, Austria
  
  IOIA Status: 10727 on August 31, 1957 – Dwight D. Eisenhower

• International Hydrographic Bureau
  
  Founded: June 21, 1921
  
  Headquarters: Monte Carlo, Monaco
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10769 on May 29, 1958 – Dwight D. Eisenhower

• International Maritime Organization (formerly the Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization – UN)
  
  Founded: March 17, 1958
  
  Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10795 on December 13, 1958 – Dwight D. Eisenhower

• World Meteorological Organization (UN)
  
  Founded: March 23, 1950
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10676 on September 1, 1959 – Dwight D. Eisenhower

• Inter-American Development Bank
  
  Founded: April 8, 1959
  
  Headquarters: Washington, DC
  
  IOIA Status: EO 10873 on April 8, 1960 by Dwight D. Eisenhower and EO 11019 on April 27, 1962 by John F. Kennedy

• International Pacific Halibut Commission
  
  Founded: 1923
  
  Headquarters: Seattle, WA
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11059 on October 23, 1962 – John F. Kennedy

• Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
  
  Founded: 1949
  
  Headquarters: San Diego, CA
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11059 on October 23, 1962 – John F. Kennedy

• Great Lakes Fishery Commission
  
  Founded: 1955
  
  Headquarters: Ann Arbor, MI
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11059 on October 23, 1962 – John F. Kennedy

• International Coffee Organization (setup under the auspices of the UN)
  
  Founded: 1963
  
  Headquarters: London, UK
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11225 on May 22, 1965 and EO 11449 by Lyndon B. Johnson

• Asian Development Bank
  
  Founded: December 19, 1966
  
  Headquarters: Mandaluyong, Philippines
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11269 on February 14, 1966 and EO 11334 on March 7, 1967 by Lyndon B. Johnson

• Inter-American Investment Corporation
  
  Founded: 1985
  
  Headquarters: Washington, DC
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11269 on February 14, 1966 by Lyndon B. Johnson and EO 12567 on October 2, 1986 by Ronald Reagan

• European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
  
  Founded: 1991
  
  Headquarters: London, UK
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11269 on February 14, 1966 by Lyndon B. Johnson and EO 12766 on June 18, 1991 by George H.W. Bush

• European Space Agency (formerly the European Space Research Organization)
  
  Founded: 1964
  
  Headquarters: Paris France
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11318 on December 5, 1966 and EO 11351 on May 22, 1067 by Lyndon B. Johnson, EO 11760 on January 17, 1974 by Richard Nixon, and EO 12766 on June 18, 1991 by George H.W. Bush

• International Secretariat for Volunteer Service (formerly the International Peace Corps Secretariat)
  
  Founded: January, 1963
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11363 on July 20, 1967 – Lyndon B. Johnson

• United International Bureau for the Protection of Intellectual Property (BIPRI)
  
  Founded: 1893
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11484 on September 29, 1969 – Richard Nixon

• World Customs Organization (formerly the Customs Cooperation Council)
  
  Founded: January 26, 1952
  
  Headquarters: Brussels, Belgium
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11596 on June 5, 1971 – Richard Nixon

• African Union (formerly the Organization of African Unity)
  
  Founded: May 25, 1963
  
  Headquarters: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11767 on February 19, 1974 by Richard Nixon and EO 13377 on April 13, 2005 by George W. Bush

• World Intellectual Property Organization (UN)
  
  Founded: July 14, 1967
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11866 on June 18, 1975 – Gerald Ford

• International Development Association (under World Bank)
  
  Founded: September 24, 1960
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11966 on January 19, 1977 – Gerald Ford

• International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (under World Bank)
  
  Founded: October 4, 1966
  
  Headquarters: Washington D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11966 on January 19, 1977 – Gerald Ford

• International Fertilizer Development Center
  
  Founded: October, 1974
  
  Headquarters: Muscle Shoals, AL
  
  IOIA Status: EO 11977 on March 14, 1977 – Jimmy Carter

• International Mobile Satellite Organization
  
  Founded: July 16, 1979
  
  Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12238 on September 12, 1980 – Jimmy Carter

• Multinational Force and Observers
  
  Founded: August 3, 1981
  
  Headquarters: Rome
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12359 on April 12, 1982 – Ronald Reagan

• International Food Policy Research Institute – limited privileges
  
  Founded: March 5, 1975
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12359 on April 22, 1982 – Ronald Reagan

• African Development Bank
  
  Founded: September 10, 1964
  
  Headquarters: Abidjan, Cote d’lvoire
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12403 on February 8, 1983 – Ronald Reagan

• International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) – limited privileges
  
  Founded: September 7, 1923
  
  Headquarters: Lyon, France
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12425 on June 16, 1983 by Ronald Reagan, EO 12971 on September 15, 1995 by William J. Clinton, and EO 13524 on December 16, 2009 by Barack Obama

• International Boundary and Water Commission – the United States & Mexico
  
  Founded: March 1, 1889
  
  Headquarters: El Paso, TX
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12467 on March 2, 1984 – Ronald Reagan

• World Tourism Organization (UN)
  
  Founded: 1975
  
  Headquarters: Madrid, Spain
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12508 on March 22, 1985 – Ronald Reagan

• Pacific Salmon Commission
  
  Founded: 1937
  
  Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12567 on October 2, 1986 – Ronald Reagan

• United Nations Industrial Development Organization
  
  Founded: November 17, 1966
  
  Headquarters: Vienna, Austria
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12628 on March 8, 1988 – Ronald Reagan

• International Committee of the Red Cross
  
  Founded: February 17, 1863
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12643 on June 23, 1988 – Ronald Reagan

• Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (under World Bank)
  
  Founded: 1988
  
  Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12467 on August 22, 1988 – Ronald Reagan

• Organization for Eastern Caribbean States
  
  Founded: 1981
  
  Headquarters: Castries, Saint Lucia
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12669 on February 20, 1989 – George H.W. Bush

• International Fund for Agriculture Development (UN)
  
  Founded: December, 1977
  
  Headquarters: Rome, Lazio, Italy
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12732 on October 31, 1990 – George H.W. Bush

• International Development Law Organization
  
  Founded: January 1, 1983
  
  Headquarters: Rome, Italy
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12842 on March 29, 1993 – William J. Clinton

• North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission
  
  Founded: February 11, 1992
  
  Headquarters: Vancouver, BC, Canada
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12895 on January 26, 1994 – William J. Clinton

• North Pacific Marine Science Organization
  
  Founded: March 24, 1992
  
  Headquarters: Sidney, Canada
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12894 on January 26, 1994 – William J. Clinton

• Border Environmental Cooperation Commission
  
  Founded: 1994
  
  Headquarters: Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12904 on March 16, 1994 – William J. Clinton

• Commission for Environmental Cooperation
  
  Founded: 1994
  
  Headquarters: Montreal, Canada
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12904 on March 16, 1994 – William J. Clinton

• North American Development Bank
  
  Founded: 1994
  
  Headquarters: San Antonio, TX
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12904 on March 16, 1994 – William J. Clinton

• Israel-United States Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation
  
  Founded: 1977
  
  Headquarters: Israel
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12956 on March 13, 1995 – William J. Clinton

• International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources – limited privileges
  
  Founded: October 5, 1948
  
  Headquarters: Gland, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 12986 on January 18, 1996 – William J. Clinton

• World Trade Organization
  
  Founded: January 1, 1995
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13042 on April 9, 1997 – William J. Clinton

• Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
  
  Founded: April 29, 1997
  
  Headquarters: The Hague, Netherlands
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13049 on June 11, 1997 – William J. Clinton

• Hong Kong Economic and Trades Offices
  
  Founded: 1986
  
  Headquarters: Beijing / New York
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13052 on June 30, 1997 – William J. Clinton

• Inter Parliamentary Union
  
  Founded: 1889
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13097 on August 7, 1998 – William J. Clinton

• GRECO (Council of Europe in Respect of the Group of States Against Corruption)
  
  Founded: 1999
  
  Headquarters: Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13240 on December 18, 2001 – George W. Bush

• European Central Bank
  
  Founded: June 1, 1998
  
  Headquarters: Frankfurt, Germany
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13307 on May 29, 2003 – George W. Bush

• African Development Fund
  
  Founded: September 10, 1964
  
  Headquarters: Tunis, Tunisia
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13377 on April 13, 2005 – George W. Bush

• Global Fund (Bill & Melinda Gates, Jeffrey Sachs, Kofi Annan, Amir Attaran)
  
  Founded: January 28, 2002
  
  Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13395 on January 13, 2006 – George W. Bush

• ITER International Fusion Energy Organization
  
  Founded: October 24, 2007
  
  Headquarters: Saint-Paul-les-Durance, France
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13451 on November 19, 2007 – George W. Bush

• Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International Civilian Office in Kosovo
  
  Founded: 1995
  
  Headquarters: Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13568 on March 8, 2011 – Barack Obama

• International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)
  
  Founded: January 26, 2009
  
  Headquarters: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13705 on September 3, 2015 – Barack Obama

• World Organization for Animal Health (formerly the Office International des Epizooties (OIE))
  
  Founded: January 25, 1924
  
  Headquarters: Paris, France
  
  IOIA Status: EO 13759 on January 12, 2017 – Barack Obama

Since Truman, every President has given immunities to a number of international organizations, except President Trump, and thus far, Biden.

GAVI The Vaccine Alliance

GAVI, founded in 2000 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, with UNICEF, the World Bank Group, and WHO listed as partners, was originally hosted by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), meaning it was granted immunities and privileges through this hosting relationship.

When UNICEF no longer hosted GAVI, it became a foundation and an international institution under Swiss law, and was given privileges and immunities in Switzerland on January 1, 2009, that equate to those the UN enjoys. In fact, GAVI was the first international institution to receive recognition under the new Host State Act in Switzerland.

Yes, this is the same GAVI that has contracted with most of the world to help rollout Covid jabs, and the same GAVI who has received billions in funding from the U.S. government over the past two decades.

As an added bonus, the U.S. decided to create the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) in 2019 to finance the private sector in healthcare, energy, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure. Just this May, GAVI and DFC partnered to create the COVAX Rapid Financing Facility, providing up to $1 billion to unleash more Covid jabs.

The World Bank, whose branches all receive outrageous immunities and privileges, is coincidentally GAVI’s trustee, manages their finances, and holds several seats on the board.

The Global Fund was founded in 2000 by Bill & Melinda Gates, Kofi Annan, Amir Attaran, and Jeffrey Sachs, and was launched in 2002. They ran a similar scheme. They established as a foundation under Swiss Law as well. In an agreement with the WHO providing a Secretariat for the Global Fund, it extended the WHO’s immunities and privileges to the Global Fund.

At the same time GAVI received privileges and immunities in Switzerland, the Global Fund ended their agreement with the WHO on the same day. That said, as seen in the list above, the Global Fund was already receiving immunities and privileges by the U.S. and had already obtained them from Switzerland as well. It didn’t take long for them to convince other jurisdictions to grant them similar immunities.

They are not the only ones who have benefited from extended immunities. Much more on this coming up in part 2.

Big Pharma

As reported in Corey’s Digs report on Measles, Masterminds, and Millions, big pharma was granted full immunity from lawsuits for injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines, back in 1986 when the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created.

Just to be clear, all big pharma, GAVI, WHO, all five World Bank arms, and the Global Fund all hold immunities. Does anyone believe they are concerned about over 1.6 million cases of jab injuries and deaths reported to VAERS since 1986, when none of them would be held accountable, and taxpayer dollars will pay out anyone who receives minimal compensation?

Remember, most of them have these immunities on an international scale. And people wonder why they walk around fearless, while expanding on “population control” goals.

CERN: The European Organization for Nuclear Research

Formed in 1954, and headquartered in Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, CERN scientists want to figure out “what the universe is made of and how it works.” While they fire up their 17-mile long Hadron Collider to study particles and probe dark matter and celebrate with incredibly bizarre satanic ritual ceremonies, they too enjoy immunity and privileges.

“The Protocol recognizes … the organization’s capacity to contract, to acquire and to dispose of movable and immovable property and to participate in legal proceedings … Among other things, the new recognition means that our pension fund – which is an integral part of CERN without a legal status of its own – can now enter into investment operations in markets that were previously hard to access.” – Eva-Maria Groniger-Voss, CERN Legal Counsel

As of March, 2004, CERN gets to enjoy additional immunities, operating outside of its host states of Switzerland and France, to the other member states of their organization.

CERN operates with 23 member states, with additional states holding observer status, and a large number of non-member states with international cooperation agreements with CERN. Observer status and non-member status of the Russian Federation was removed on March 8, 2022.

The Protocol also grants them immunity from jurisdiction of the national courts. Of course, personnel who have claims against the organization need to submit them to the International Labour Organization, who also holds international immunity status. Immunity from jurisdiction is also extended to personnel, and exempts them and their family members from income tax and immigration restrictions. CERN has over 9,000 scientists.

The Bank for International Settlements was established in Basel, Switzerland in 1930. It is an international financial institution owned by central banks and serves as a bank for central banks, in addition to acting as an agent or trustee with international financial transactions. It’s made up of members of central banks and monetary authorities, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

BIS is governed by a Board of Directors. In fact, Jerome H. Powell serves on the Board. BIS operates with sovereign immunity, and according to their website, some of these immunities not only extend to BIS members under specific activities, but also extend to “systemically important institutions,” which is likely the insurers, and payment systems.

There are currently 63 member banks and monetary authorities, plus their subsidiary members under the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI). They also have innovation hubs for CBDCs.

In the agreement between the Swiss Federal Council and BIS, a few of the immunities breakdown as follows:

Article 12-15, 18: Immunity for members of the board of directors, officers, bank staff, representatives of (non-)member banks and ‘experts’, including inviolability of all documentation.

Article 24: Immunity of premises.

Essentially, what this means, is that there is absolutely no transparency, traceability, or accountability for where funds are being moved.

The fact that some of these immunities extend to members and appear to extend to “systemically important institutions” by BIS, comes as no surprise. Separately, as seen in the list above on International Organizations with immunity, we know that the following 13 financial institutions do have immunities under the International Organizations Immunities Act:

• African Development Bank

• African Development Fund

• Asian Development Bank

• European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

• European Central Bank (also listed on BIS under 63 member banks)

• Inter-American Development Bank

• International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank)

• International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (part of the World Bank Group)

• International Development Association (part of the World Bank Group)

• International Finance Corporation (part of the World Bank Group)

• International Monetary Fund (UN)

• Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (part of the World Bank Group)

• North American Development Bank

In 2005, Bill H.R. 3269 was introduced by Congress to amend the International Organization Immunities Act to include the Bank for International Settlements under the Act. Whereas, it passed the House, it never made it out of the Senate.

Catherine Austin Fitts of The Solari Report, Patrick Wood, and John Titus, have all covered the immunities with BIS and Central Banks and their findings thus far, so rather than regurgitate their solid work on this, it is all linked below. That said, there are a few additional points that need to be made in regard to some key timing elements.

A Few Key Timeline Points for Reference:

December 23, 1913

The Federal Reserve was created

January 20, 1930

The Bank for International Settlements was founded

1936

The Hague Convention expanded BIS’ immunities

July, 1944

The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) was founded

December 27, 1945

Eleven European countries signed the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) Articles of Agreement

December 29, 1945

The U.S. signed the International Organizations Immunities Act into law

February 19, 1946

President Harry S. Truman began dishing out immunities to international organizations, which included the World Bank Group’s five branches, as well as other banks listed above

September, 1994

The first BIS Board meeting after the Federal Reserve finally purchased shares in the BIS system, kicked off the central bank system on a global scale, with BIS at the helm

October 1, 1997

Money began going missing from the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the US Federal Government, in large amounts, totaling $21 trillion by fiscal 2015

September 10, 2000

BIS sent a note to its registered shareholders informing them of BIS’ decision to the new restriction on the right to hold shares in the BIS exclusively to central banks, which included details about the mandatory repurchase of all shares, and the amendments of BIS’ statutes that were to be adopted by the Extraordinary General Meeting held on January 8, 2001. Note on BIS’ site.

May, 2002

BIS created a subsidiary called the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI), whereby the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a member, along with 91 other deposit insurers. The U.S. Treasury, International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank are a few of the partners of IADI.

August 22, 2019

BlackRock’s white paper on “Going Direct” reveals that the central bank is moving funds directly into the hands of public and private sector spenders (meaning equity investors), in a laundering scheme. The plan injected more than $5 trillion into the U.S. financial system. The following month, the U.S. Federal Reserve began a repo loan bailout program by “Going Direct” to the trading houses on Wall Street, and in March 2020, hired BlackRock to help implement the “Going Direct” plan.

For a fuller understanding on the history of BIS, central banks, immunities, and what this all means, it is prudent to watch and read the following:

• All The Plenary’s Men, by John Titus

• The Iron Bank: Is BIS Sovereign Immunity the Secret Sauce Behind the Global Coup? Part 1 with Catherine Austin Fitts and Patrick Wood

• The Iron Bank: Is BIS Sovereign Immunity the Secret Sauce Behind the Global Coup? Part 2 with Catherine Austin Fitts and Patrick Wood

• Does the BIS Owe US $21 Trillion (Or Owe You $65,000)? by Catherine Austin Fitts

• Fed Immunity for Banksters with John Titus and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

• The Tower of Basel, by Adam Lebor

• Missing Money, section on The Solari Report containing documents, articles, and videos

Members of BIS: 63 Central Banks, Monetary Authorities and The Federal Reserve System:

This does not include the insurers and payment systems companies

• Bank of Algeria

• Central Bank of Argentina

• Reserve Bank of Australia

• Central Bank of the Republic of Austria

• National Bank of Belgium

• Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina

• Central Bank of Brazil

• Bulgarian National Bank

• Bank of Canada

• Central Bank of Chile

• People’s Bank of China

• Central Bank of Colombia

• Croatian National Bank

• Czech National Bank

• Danmarks National bank (Denmark)

• Bank of Estonia

• European Central Bank

• Bank of Finland

• Bank of France

• Deutsche Bundesbank (Germany)

• Bank of Greece

• Hong Kong Monetary Authority

• Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Hungary)

• Central Bank of Iceland

• Reserve Bank of India

• Bank Indonesia

• Central Bank of Ireland

• Bank of Israel

• Bank of Italy

• Bank of Japan

• Bank of Korea

• Central Bank of Kuwait

• Bank of Latvia

• Bank of Lithuania

• Central Bank of Luxembourg

• Central Bank of Malaysia

• Bank of Mexico

• Bank Al-Maghrib (Central Bank of Morocco)

• Netherlands Bank

• Reserve Bank of New Zealand

• Central Bank of Norway

• National Bank of the Republic of North Macedonia

• Central Reserve Bank of Peru

• Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Philippines)

• Narodowy Bank Polski (Poland)

• Banco de Portugal

• National Bank of Romania

• Central Bank of the Russian Federation

• Saudi Central Bank

• National Bank of Serbia

• Monetary Authority of Singapore

• National Bank of Slovakia

• Bank of Slovenia

• South African Reserve Bank

• Bank of Spain

• Sveriges Riksbank (Sweden)

• Swiss National Bank

• Bank of Thailand

• Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye

• Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates

• Bank of England

• Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (United States)

• State Bank of Vietnam

Now that the ah ha moment has taken effect, contemplate how many thousands of NGOs and corporations have operated with and through this vast field of immunity, this untraceable and unaccountable land that knows no boundaries. There is no red tape within this realm – only dystopian fantasies they wish to fulfill as they pick off the feeders to serve their future dreamworld.

Just imagine walking through life knowing that you are untouchable, and consider the euphoria these power-hungry individuals steep in. Seduced by darkness and void of conscience, they continue to roll forward with their agendas, as everyone sits by praying for a miracle.

These are groups of men and women who masterminded a plan to take global control of the world’s money and weaponize it against everyone. The plotting began a century ago, and it’s far past time to foil their plan.

The John Birch Society recently published a couple of brilliant ideas as one way to combat this tyranny. They explain that state governments have an obligation to make all unconstitutional federal actions unenforceable, or null and void, and lay out two ways of accomplishing this when it comes to federal spending.

1. Enact an Escrow Law — They suggest that state legislatures should enact a “State Sovereignty and Federal Tax Funds Act,” known as an “escrow” law. Federal taxes would be required to go into a special fund controlled by the state government.

   Once they calculate the actual constitutional federal spending, the state would only send that percentage of funds to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Remaining funds would go toward state expenditures that were reliant on federal funding, or be returned to taxpayers.

   They point out that this would save taxpayers a considerable amount of hard-earned money because they estimate that 80% of federal spending is unconstitutional. This would protect the state and the people, while putting the federal government in check. They also point out that this bill has been introduced in five states in previous years, but has yet to be enacted into law, which is critical right now in order to gain the upper hand.

2. Nullify the Federal Reserve — Here, they argue that the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional and has created a monopoly on currency. They illustrate how 42 states have enacted legislation to abolish or curtail sales taxes on precious metals, which is a big step toward treating them as legal tender.

   Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming are leading the pack by reaffirming the validity of gold and silver as legal tender to compete against Federal Reserve Notes. Texas opened a state precious-metals depository, and Tennessee has enacted legislation to study creating its own depository.

   These are great steps in the right direction, but as the John Birch Society points out, state governments must enforce the Constitution’s Gold and Silver Clause (Article I, Section 10), which declares that “No State shall … make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.”

The bottom line is that states had better stop taking federal financial assistance which locks them into the rules and stipulations the government attaches to those funds, and they had better start holding them accountable, severing ties, and fulfilling their obligations to the people of their state, or these thieves will continue to thrive until they bleed everyone dry.

People, on the other hand, had better start paying attention to who they are doing business with, where they are banking and investing, why cash is so important to stay out of their system, and why everyone must get this information in the hands of their legislators immediately. Trillions of dollars have moved from the people, through the IRS and big Gov, and straight into their hands.

This spin cycle needs to come to an end. The Sound Money Defense League is a good source for information on state laws with precious metals and up-to-date news and insights on the financial moves being made.

This is a call to action, and people need to work together to strategize, make moves, and confront this enslavement scheme everyone has fallen prey to. It’s time to close the doors on this laundromat for good. Be sure to watch for Part 2 of this critical information from Corey Lynn on laundering immunity.

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

• Willow Biosciences is working on the commercial development of astaxanthin made from GE yeast

• Despite its origins in a laboratory, Willow is intending to market the product as a natural alternative to chemically produced astaxanthin

• The production uses microorganisms to create fake GE astaxanthin in a process known as “precision fermentation”

• There’s nothing “natural” about it, but the biotech industry greenwashes it to make it sound like it’s a step-up from nature

• Fake food is all the rage, being championed by the technocratic elite eager to take control of the food supply

• Several foods contain generous amounts of astaxanthin, including wild-caught Alaskan salmon, trout, krill or krill oil, shrimp and crayfish

Astaxanthin — the “king of the carotenoids” — is a naturally occurring compound in certain microalgae and seafood. As its health benefits have become more widely known, the market for this antioxidant powerhouse has expanded into a mega industry expected to reach $4.75 billion by 2028.1

Now used in multiple industries including food, nutrition and animal feed, most astaxanthin is produced synthetically from petroleum derivatives.2 This type of astaxanthin should be avoided.

If you want real astaxanthin, it must be straight from the source, which is the Haematococcus pluvialis microalgae. This type of algae produces the antioxidant once its water supply dries up, and it goes into survival mode to protect itself from sunlight, ultraviolet radiation and low nutrition.3

Now, however, biotech companies are attempting to capitalize on the superiority of natural astaxanthin by creating genetically engineered (GE) varieties that — although far from natural — can be claimed as such on the label.

Willow Biosciences is working on the commercial development of astaxanthin made from GE yeast. In October 2022, the biotechnology company announced it had started yeast strain optimization and process development toward that end, calling the GE astaxanthin “the next functional ingredient” in their product portfolio.4

Yet, despite its origins in a laboratory, Willow is intending to market the product as a natural alternative to chemically produced astaxanthin. In a press release, Peter Seufer-Wasserthal, Willow’s interim president and chief executive officer, stated:5

“Astaxanthin meets all the criteria for development using our fully integrated FutureGrownTM technology platform. It has a large addressable market, with the majority of product currently supplied being chemically produced using a petroleum feedstock.

Willow offering a natural, clean, sustainably produced product allows not only penetration of the current large volume market, but expansion of the market for human health & wellness, where there is currently no high-purity, cost effective bio-based product available.”

Astaxanthin is widely used as an additive in animal feed, and Willow appears to be targeting that market, which accounts for the majority of astaxanthin sales globally.6 In addition, they’re intending to market their GE FutureGrownTM Astaxanthin as a misleadingly “more natural” option for use in food, nutrition and cosmetics.

According to Willow, “With global consumer expectations shifting to healthier, more natural sources of functional ingredients, Willow believes its FutureGrownTM Astaxanthin will be welcomed by the market, and in high demand.”7 A proof of concept has already been completed, with development underway.

Willow has previously used microbial fermentation to produce cannabinoids but abandoned that project for now due to regulatory and pricing hurdles. Their new cash cow is GE astaxanthin, and that’s where they’re focusing their efforts. Billing its products as “the next generation of nature,”8 the biotech firm describes its platform this way:9

“Using the instructions contained in the genes of plants, we can produce the same compounds at higher purity, speed, consistency, and cost-effectiveness, but smaller environmental impact than traditional agriculture practices. Our innovative research platform reinvents the production of molecules for global pharmaceutical, health and wellness, and consumer packaged goods industries.”

The production uses microorganisms to create fake GE astaxanthin in a process known as “precision fermentation.” When you read about their process, it’s easy to see that there’s nothing “natural” about it. But notice how they greenwash it to make it sound like it’s a step-up from nature. Here’s how Willow explains it on their website:10

“01: Plant Biotech — Nature’s instructions for producing plant-derived molecules are encoded in the plant’s genome. We follow nature’s lead by identifying the genes responsible for their production.

02: Biosynthesis — We transfer that genetic information into yeast, transforming the yeast host into an extraordinary miniature factory. The process is economical and meticulously monitored to ensure quality.

03: Yeast Fermentation — Combining low-cost inputs with our optimized yeast strains in a fermentation vessel results in an ideal manufacturing platform. Unlike plant-based production which can take months, our process takes just days.

04: Purification — Our production technology produces target molecules that are identical to those produced in plants, but free of the pesticides, waxes, and heavy metals often found in plant feedstocks.”

What is perhaps most disturbing about the use of precision fermentation is that companies are allowed to claim that it’s natural. Metabolic engineering is a major subset of precision fermentation, which involves methods such as next-generation sequencing, high-throughput library screening, molecular cloning and multiomics “to optimize microbial strains, metabolic pathways, product yields, and bioprocess scale-up.”11 Sounds just like something down on the farm, doesn’t it?

The yeast strains used by Willow are genetically engineered. So why won’t their astaxanthin have to carry a bioengineered label in the U.S.? Seufer-Wasserthal told Food Navigator-USA, “We are using genetically engineered strains, because only those will allow getting to the economics needed in a reasonable timeframe. Downstream processing and product purification will remove all DNA and protein to nondetectable levels allowing ‘natural’ designation.”12

Astaxanthin is just one product using this type of precision fermentation technology. Soy leghemoglobin,13 or heme, which is used in Impossible Foods’ fake meat products, is another. Originally, Impossible Foods harvested leghemoglobin from the roots of soy plants, but deemed that method unsustainable.

Instead, they turned to genetic engineering, which they use to insert the DNA from soy plants into yeast, creating genetically engineered (GE) yeast with the gene for soy leghemoglobin.14

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved soy leghemoglobin in 2019, prompting the Center for Food Safety (CFS) to file a lawsuit challenging the approval, which they called “unusually rapid”15 and risky for public health.

In 2021, the federal appeals court in San Francisco upheld the FDA’s approval, which allowed Impossible Burgers to hit grocery stores across the U.S.16 Humans have never before consumed GE heme. To be clear, while Impossible Foods refers to it as “heme,” technically plants produce non-heme iron, and this is technically GE yeast-derived soy leghemoglobin.17

Heme iron only occurs in meat and seafood. Impossible Foods’ GE heme is used in “substantial quantities” in their fake meat burgers as a color additive that makes the product appear to “bleed” like real meat.

Further, more than 12 yeast proteins also exist in the GE heme, the health effects of which are unknown. Because color additives in food are not a substantively beneficial addition but rather are used only to improve aesthetics, they’re supposed to be held to a higher standard of safety for approval compared to other food additives.

This wasn’t done, according to CFS, which called the FDA’s approval of GE heme as a color additive “unlawful.”18 Dana Perls, from Friends of the Earth, pointed out that study rats exhibited alterations in blood chemistry after being fed leghemoglobin, which the company did not follow up on.19

Consumer Reports senior scientist Michael Hansen added that there are no long-term studies of soy leghemoglobin in humans, even though the process to make it creates other proteins as byproducts, which are also consumed and in need of further evaluation.20 Even the FDA has raised concerns over the soy leghemoglobin in the Impossible Burger being a possible human allergen.21

Perfect Day is another company that’s using GE organisms to make fake food. In this case, Trichoderma reesei fungus is used to produce synthetic versions of the dairy proteins casein and whey.22 Perfect Day was founded in 2014 by two vegan bioengineers looking for a better-tasting animal-free “milk”.23 The company states it’s producing real milk proteins — identical to what cows produce,24 but even though it may be molecularly identical, it’s far from the same.

The process to make lab-grown, animal-free milk proteins is far from natural but, like Willow, Perfect Day is trying to get around that, describing their process as “solving our biggest problems through precision fermentation:”25

“Microflora are tiny microorganisms that do powerful things, like nourishing trees and helping our own bodies digest. We’ve given them the precise DNA sequence that serves as a blueprint for how to make cow whey protein, the thing that makes milk taste, whip, and swirl like milk. Getting this DNA blueprint requires no animal involvement at all.”

Instead, they use GE fungi microflora. It’s quite telling that, while the healthiest dairy products come from grass fed cows that are integrated into their surrounding environment, Perfect Day’s fake milk proteins can only be produced in a system “without ever touching an animal.”26

Similarly, Imagindairy company used a $13 million seed investment to commercialize the production of animal-free milk proteins. The CEO of the company believes the market is looking for more fake food based on animal-free proteins.27

The production also uses precision fermentation, with the company boasting that this specific process does not require a cow. Instead, the DNA blueprint given to the microorganisms is produced by software. The microflora are added to a tank with water, nutrients and sugar. Since the organisms have the DNA blueprint, during fermentation they produce the two proteins.

The scientists then separate the proteins from the microflora, after which it is filtered, purified and dried. The resulting powder can be used to make milk, cream cheese, yogurt and cheese — with no cow in sight.

Fake food is all the rage, being championed by the technocratic elite eager to take control of the food supply. The EAT Forum, cofounded by the Wellcome Trust, developed a Planetary Health Diet28 designed to be applied to the global population. It entails cutting meat and dairy intake by up to 90%, replacing them largely with foods made in laboratories, along with cereals and oil.

Their largest initiative is called FReSH, which aims to transform the food system by working with biotech and fake meat companies to replace whole foods with lab-created alternatives. In other words, once tech giants have control of meat, dairy, cereals and oils, they will be the ones profiting from and controlling the food supply.

Private companies that control the food supply will ultimately control countries and entire populations. Biotech will eventually push farmers and ranchers out of the equation and will threaten food security. Ultimately, the work being done in the name of sustainability and saving the planet will give greater control to private corporations.

The solution is to stick to real food and support the farmers who are still producing it — especially those using regenerative, biodynamic and/or grass fed farming methods. Regarding astaxanthin, skip varieties produced synthetically or using GE yeast. As for astaxanthin, there are several foods that contain generous amounts, including wild-caught Alaskan salmon, trout, krill or krill oil, shrimp and crayfish.29

If you choose to go the supplement route, I strongly recommend those made from the Haematococcus pluvialis microalgae, not the ones made from petrochemicals or GE yeast. This ensures you’re getting the benefits the antioxidant is known for without the risks of GMOs or petrochemicals.

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.