‘Tinfoil Hat’ Folks Get the Last Laugh: Former CIA Chief Brennan Lauded Chemtrails in CFR Speech

PHOTO: In5d.com

CZYxkgxVIAAfPhKOn June 29, 2016, CIA Director John Brennan delivered a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations during which he clearly confessed in plain English to the use of geoengineering around the globe. He touts the benefits of spraying aerosol particles in the atmosphere to allegedly reflect sunlight. He then finishes by stating that this technology could cause countries to rise up and oppose one another. This is an admission that they have technology that can manipulate the weather, and even use it as a weapon.

Furthermore, it’s Winter Watch’s contention that this method is used for behavior modification on human populations. It creates a listless, lower reactive mind to fog the ability to tell the difference between real and unreal. This is constantly tested in real time via the staged deceptions and surreal CGI.

These empty suits are out-of-control transhumanists trying to play God and with nature. With this admission, the disingenuous “conspiracy theorist” debunking of the chemtrail evidence is looking more and more dicey and suspect. Who is wearing the tinfoil hat now, suckers.

Aerosal is the preferred method of delivery especially if the goal is penetrating the blood brain barrier. The goal isn’t always die off or making people ill, but zombification.

Aerosol particles with a diameter of 1-15 mm mass median diameter (MMD) are readily absorbed by lung cells following inhalation, the primary mode of infection by most biological agents.

Weather Modification 101: Would love to see somebody try and debunk this one. It is from Nexrad’s actual website.

Excellent documentary on geoengineering and chemtrailing (Italian with English subtitles):

408570_450863081634262_1178570845_n

FTX laundered money to Ukraine for biological weapons shelter funding

Image: FTX laundered money to Ukraine for biological weapons shelter funding

(Natural News) Cryptocurrency holdings in FTX that were supposed to go towards Ukraine’s war efforts were instead funneled into biological weapons shelters, we now know.

The unraveling Ponzi scheme involved collecting investor cash and quietly using it to fund Ukrainian bioweapons projects – and all with the help of the National Bank of Ukraine, which was laundering money in collusion with Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF).

SBF launched a “charitable fund” called the Future Fund, the board of which was occupied by himself and Caroline Ellison, his former girlfriend. That fund, in addition to supporting the corporate-controlled media, was used to construct and design bioweapons shelters throughout Ukraine.

Money that was invested into FTX was routed by SBF into the Future Fund, which then disbursed it to Ukrainian bioweapons projects as well as the Biden regime and the Democrat Party at large. There were also several Democrat super PACs on the dole from the FTX scam.

As you may recall, Russia’s defense ministry blew the lid on Ukraine’s many United States-funded biolabs, only to be accused of spreading “propaganda” and “misinformation.” Now, it is undeniable that these Ukrainian biolabs exist and that FTX played a crucial role in funding them. (Related: Learn more about how Binance, an early FTX investor, is also tied to globalist entities such as the World Economic Forum [WEF] and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP].)

“There are 25-plus U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine which, if breached, would release and spread deadly pathogens to the U.S. and world,” said former Democrat politician from Hawaii-turned-anti-establishment hero Tulsi Gabbard back in March.

Brighteon.TV

“We must take action now to prevent disaster. U.S. / Russia / Ukraine / NATO / UN / EU must implement a ceasefire now around these labs until they’re secured and pathogens destroyed.”

Tulsi Gabbard was right all along: U.S.-run biolabs are everywhere in Ukraine

Gabbard’s statements were backed by testimony from Victoria Nuland, the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs in Eurasia. In speaking before Congress, Nuland admitted that biological research labs do, in fact, dot the landscape of Ukraine as Russia claimed. Nuland did not call them bioweapons labs, but putting the pieces together reveals that this is exactly what they are – especially now with the FTX revelation.

Less than 24 hours after Gabbard made these statements, then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, who now works for MSNBC as a host, called the biolabs claims “fake news” propagated by Russia.

From there on out, pretty much every left-wing media outlet began parroting Psaki’s claims, almost like they all get their talking points and positions straight from the Biden White House.

Not long after that, Russia released captured documents as proof that U.S.-run biolabs blanket the Ukrainian landscape just as Gabbard said. These documents were released right in front of the United Nations General Assembly.

After that, the Pentagon eventually caved in a public concession that the biolabs are real and are not just fake news drummed up by the Kremlin. This means that Gabbard was right all along, and now we see the FTX connection as well.

“This all leads to covid, the coup, financing election theft, money laundering, outright stealing, and treason,” wrote a commenter about how all the pieces are falling into place just perfectly.

Another wrote that Ellison is not SBF’s “former girlfriend,” but is rather a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) representative who ran cover for SBF and in return received billions of dollars in bribes.

“Everything was about getting Trump down,” suggested another. “It had nothing to do with covid, the pandemic, or any other liberal garbage, all orchestrated by globalists at the WEF.”

As crypto corruption contagion spreads, we will keep you informed about the latest at CryptoCult.news.

Sources for this article include:

TheGatewayPundit.com

NaturalNews.com

Aggravated Trump lashes out after controversial dinner with controversial figure Nick Fuentes who came with Kanye West

Image: Aggravated Trump lashes out after controversial dinner with controversial figure Nick Fuentes who came with Kanye West

(Natural News) Former President Donald Trump has reportedly responded to another burgeoning controversy after he dined with Nick Fuentes at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate late last month.

According to the New York Post, Fuentes accompanied rapper and mega-fashion guru Kanye West, who now goes simply by “Ye,” to the dinner, leading Trump to declare that West was just trying to “f**k him” over — which apparently worked to perfection.

The former president, 76, said he was “totally blindsided” by the presence of Fuentes at the dinner, which a close confidant told NBC News was “a total setup.”

“He tried to f— me. He’s crazy. He can’t beat me,” Trump said, according to the source, an apparent reference to West’s alleged 2024 presidential run.

The Post noted further:

The disastrous encounter at the 45th president’s Palm Beach, Fla. resort took place two days before Thanksgiving, exactly one week after Trump announced his third consecutive run for the White House.

Some aides had advised Trump against meeting with West, who has come under fire for making a series of anti-semitic remarks which cost him lucrative sponsorship deals with Adidas and Balenciaga, but the ex-president ignored all the warnings. 

Trump and West reportedly were supposed to meet one-on-one in the club’s library, but Trump, eager to show off his celebrity guest to his paying club members, decided to hold court on the club’s main patio dining area.

Alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos, formerly of Breitbart News and who is now reportedly working on West’s campaign, bragged to NBC News he was the one who set up the dinner and the controversial guest “just to make Trump’s life miserable.”

Brighteon.TV

“I wanted to show Trump the kind of talent that he’s missing out on by allowing his terrible handlers to dictate who he can and can’t hang out with,’ Yiannopoulos said. “I also wanted to send a message to Trump that he has systematically repeatedly neglected, ignored, abused the people who love him the most, the people who put him in office, and that kind of behavior comes back to bite you in the end.”

Karen Giorno, a former Trump campaign aide who also reportedly was involved in the meeting, also said she did not realize who Fuentes was until after he was at the dinner and it was too late. She told NBC News she thought to herself at the time: “I’m going to kill Milo.”

She added that she attempted to guide Fuentes and someone else who came with West to a bar area so that Trump could engage and dine with the rap mogul by himself.

However, Trump reportedly said that it was up to his guest who he wanted to dine with and West offered, “Let’s all eat,” to which Trump responded, “Great. Let’s go out to the patio.”

A video Ye later posted to social media featured him saying that he told Trump he was going to run for president in 2024 and asked Trump to be his running mate.

In an interview with Fox News Digital on Tuesday, Trump claimed that he had “never heard of” Fuentes.

“I had no idea what his views were and they weren’t expressed at the table in our very quick dinner, or it wouldn’t have been accepted,” Trump said.

Later, the former president took to his own social media platform, Truth Social, to say that West came to Trump seeking business advice due to “difficulties” the rapper is supposedly having.

“We also discussed, to a lesser extent, politics, where I told him he should definitely not run for President, ‘any voters you may have should vote for TRUMP. Anyway, we got along great, he expressed no anti-Semitism, & I appreciated all the nice things he said about me on ‘Tucker Carlson.’ Why wouldn’t I agree to meet? Also, I don’t know Nick Fuentes,” he added.

Sources include:

TruthSocial.com

NYPost.com

Top Hollywood stars say Hollywood executives are a den of parasites who feast on the blood of kids and TRAFFIC them for adrenochrome

Image: Top Hollywood stars say Hollywood executives are a den of parasites who feast on the blood of kids and TRAFFIC them for adrenochrome

(Natural News) Is the blood of terrorized children a form of currency in Hollywood? According to Mel Gibson, star of Brave Heart and Lethal Weapon, Hollywood is just institutionalized pedophilia, where the elites break “every God-given taboo known to man, including the sanctity of children.” Apparently, it’s an open secret in Hollywood that the ultra-rich, yet still power-hungry elites, have religious ceremonies where they terrorize children to the edge of death, then drink their adrenochrome-loaded blood. Adrenochrome is a chemical compound produced by the oxidation of adrenaline, the stress hormone, which can be derived from torturing children to the point where they believe they are about to die (or really are).

Now, the star of a Mel Gibson directed movie “Passion of the Christ,” Jim Caviezel, is blowing the whistle about Hollywood elites kidnapping kids and trafficking them for adrenochrome rituals. Where is the FBI when you REALLY need them? Nowhere to be found, except prosecuting innocent Americans for staged events, like on January 6th, 2020.

When will the Den of Hollywood Parasites be investigated for kidnapping, child trafficking, child abuse, and possibly mass murder?

Are the Hollywood elites so rich they’re untouchable, even when committing horrific atrocities to children and babies? Two Hollywood famous actors and insiders are literally calling this out, and they might serve as witnesses in a trial, if any law enforcement agencies would step up to the moral and legal ‘plate’ and do their job.

Brighteon.TV

Jim Caviezel, also the star of the hit series “Person of Interest,” attended the Health and Freedom Conference in Oklahoma last week, and said that Hollywood elite freaks and perverts are “raping and murdering” kids for adrenochrome.

The practice of obtaining adrenochrome for drug abuse is a plot in several Hollywood movies and TV series, where cabals of Satanists capture children, rape them, then while murdering them, they harvest their blood and drink it as an “elixir of youth.” It would appear this is not just ‘made for movies’ scripts, but happening in real life, as top Hollywood stars are ‘coming out’ and blowing the whistle about it.

According to Mel Gibson, Hollywood elites are most likely gutting kids alive to get their adrenochrome-laced youth elixir fix

It’s nothing new in Hollywood. The blood of sexually abused children, including infants, is considered the most enriched, “premium brand” of blood, and perfect for the filthy rich elitists who like getting high off drinking it. Is it being sold for top dollar in the city of angels, or just traded for top roles in movies and shows? Is there a secret society, like the Nazis had, where the richest freaks gather around and torture and abuse kids just to get their rocks off? According to a few famous actors, yes.

There is also a pedophile ring at the heart of the music industry, according to insiders and famous musicians who have blown that whistle. Surely mainstream media and the tech giants will continue to bury and censor all the sources and whistleblowers, pretending none of this is happening, except in the movies, of course.

Drinking baby blood is part of a satanic ritual, and we see these signs of worshipping the devil right out in the open, representing rock shows, pop stars, and hip-hop performances. Witchcraft and illuminati “prayers” are becoming even more prominent in Hollywood and at live music events, as if the crowd is involuntarily part of the worship of the devil and all things evil. Kids and teens that attend the events and get dragged into the ‘matrix’ of all of this are much more apt to lose their moral compass and experiment with drugs and gender-fluid sex-changes, and that’s mainly what the performances are all about – grooming the children (think Disney also here).

Bookmark Censored.news to your favorite websites for truth news about Satan’s Hollywood adrenochrome freaks and those blood-thirsty stars that’s being censored from the rest of media as you read this.

Sources for this article include:

Newspunch.com

EarHustle411.com

NaturalNews.com

‘Died Suddenly’ — World Premiere

World Premiere: Died Suddenly

  • The unprecedented epidemic of “sudden death” coincides with the rollout of the experimental gene therapies falsely and fraudulently marketed as vaccines against COVID-19

  • The Stew Peters Network documentary, “Died Suddenly,” dissects this frightening trend and digs into the ideology that has shaped the geopolitical landscape for decades, a worldview that says there are too many people in the world, and that population control are necessary for mankind’s survival

  • Embalmers around the world are finding mysterious, never before seen fibrous clots in the circulatory systems of COVID-jabbed individuals who die. These fibrous structures only started occurring after the rollout of the COVID shots

  • In addition to increasing the death rate, the COVID shots are also lowering birth rates. Infertility in men and women is up. Miscarriages, premature births, birth defects and neonatal deaths have all massively increased, and live births have decreased. Most countries report birth rate decreases between 10% and 15%, but in Australia, the birth rate has declined by a shocking 72%

  • Not all feedback on the film has been favorable. Among critics are Dr. Robert Malone, who has pointed out problems with the film

Visit Mercola Market

Advertisement

Those paying attention to obituaries over the past two years will have noticed an alarming trend. People of all ages, many of whom had no underlying health conditions, have “died suddenly,” sometimes in their sleep, sometimes while playing sports, sometimes while going about their everyday business.

Without warning, their hearts failed and they dropped dead. Or they suffered sudden multiorgan failure. Or a massive blood clot. Or “unknown causes.” It’s an unprecedented epidemic of “sudden death,” and it coincides with the rollout of experimental gene therapies falsely and fraudulently marketed as vaccines against COVID-19.

The Stew Peters Network documentary, “Died Suddenly,” dissects this frightening trend and digs into the ideology that has shaped the geopolitical landscape for decades, a worldview that says there are too many people in the world, and that population control are necessary for mankind’s survival. Is that what these COVID shots are ultimately all about?

“Died Suddenly” received millions of views within 24 hours of its release. Not all feedback has been favorable, however. I decided to run the video, along with some of the critiques against it. My conclusion is that it’s a worthwhile watch, with the caveat that it cannot be used as proof of any given theory.

The Substack journalist that goes by the moniker A Midwestern Doctor and Dr. Robert Malone are but two individuals in the truth movement who have pointed out problems with the film.

A Midwestern Doctor writes:1

“I am personally a bit torn on this movie because it covers a lot of important ground and is presented in a highly persuasive manner that will red-pill many who are on the fence, but it also has a variety of errors and tangental conspiratorial content which makes it prone to being debunked and discrediting this message to those who were on the fence about it …

In the case of the COVID-19 vaccines, although they have a variety of issues, the unique blood clots they form once observed in autopsies also fulfill that requirement, and hence are a home run for persuasion. Similarly, I felt their section represented by far the most persuasive part of ‘Died Suddenly’ …

Unfortunately … there is one huge issue with this segment. The live clot at the end has nothing to do with the COVID-19 vaccinations (it came from a surgery posted on YouTube a year before the vaccines entered the market).

I suspect this arose because someone re-uploaded that clip and labeled it as being from the vaccines (either as a prank or as clickbait) and then it was re-shared until the Died Suddenly team got it and added it in since it supported their narrative.”

A Midwestern Doctor does, however, confirm that many funeral home directors, when asked off the record, admit seeing the fibrous clots shown in the film, but keep quiet due to fear of losing their livelihood. So, the clots are most certainly occurring. In the article, he goes on to review some of the scientific findings that might explain these clots, which are not part of the film, so for additional information, his article is a good start.

Malone has a similar critique:2

“Other commentators (for example ‘The Daily Skeptic‘ and Josh Guetzkow) have appropriately noted that the … video includes segments which are misleading at best, falsely imply one or more cause-effect relationship between a sudden death event and vaccine administration, or otherwise employ cinematic license to stoke outrage.

I have previously written regarding the business model of Stoking Rage … and in my opinion this strategy is fundamentally the same as the ‘fearporn’ business model of corporate media … I reject the assertion that, on the battlefield of the current 21st century unrestricted media and information war which we are immersed in, it is acceptable to employ the tactics of our opponents …

As I have said so many times, in so many lectures, our opponents in this information war, this war on truth and integrity, have no ethical guardrails. Ethics are entirely situational in their world …

There is nothing in this ‘Died Suddenly’ which represents new news, as far as I can tell. This seems to mostly be a sensationalized but well-produced video covering information which has been known for quite some time. While Steve Kirsch was interviewed in the film, he did not fund or sponsor the production, or have any input beyond his personal interview, and neither he or his organization endorses it.”

According to Malone, “one of the apparent breaches of accuracy” in the film involves an example of sudden death that is “demonstrably unelated to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.”

“These types of ‘artistic license’ distortions of truth cause both damage to the credibility of the arguments being made (which may otherwise be valid), and can also cause psychologic pain,” Malone writes.

“Furthermore, these types of errors become weapons which will be deployed against us by our opponents in this unrestricted information war battlefield.”

So, while the film highlights problems that ought to have been part of the public discussion from the start, the unfortunate inclusion of footage that is unrelated to the COVID shots weakens it. I still encourage you to view the film. Just understand that you cannot rely on every detail in the film to be wholly accurate. With all of that in mind, here’s a summary of some of the highlights in the film.

As explained in the film, the Malthusian population theory,3 introduced by economist Thomas Robert Malthus in 1798, is the idea that unchecked population growth will eventually result in the die-off of mankind.

According to Malthus, the growth of human populations is exponential, while the growth of resources is linear. So, as a population grows larger, living standards are lowered until, finally, the entire population dies from starvation. To keep population growth in balance, we either have to increase the death rate or lower the birth rate — and the COVID shots, we now find, do both.

Interestingly, many of the people who are hard at work developing and promoting supposedly life-saving vaccines are also long-time adherents to the Malthusian theory. They believe the world is overpopulated, and that it will lead to the extinction of mankind unless something is done about it.

Bill Gates is a perfect example of someone who claims the vaccine development and distribution he funds is saving the lives of millions, while at the same time being a proponent of population control and eugenics. In a now-infamous TED Talk, he stated that “if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care and reproductive health services, we can lower that by, perhaps, 10 to 15%.”

As noted by funeral director Chad Whisnant, common sense dictates that if a man tells you he intends to reduce the world’s population by 15% using vaccines, probably, a number of people will die because they got a vaccine. And here we are.

People are dropping like flies, yet government and media pretend as if everything’s normal. It’s not. Children and teenagers do not die in their sleep. At no time in history have several hundred athletes dropped dead in a single year.

Healthy people with no history of disease don’t just die. And never before have people had tough fibrous clots, made from some mysterious, yet-to-be-determined elastic substance, in their cardiovascular systems.

Richard Hirschman was the first embalmer to go public with his findings of these mysterious fibrous clots, extracted from people who died, starting in 2021. In November that year, he created a spread sheet to keep track of the size and frequency of these clots, and whether the person was known to have received a COVID shot.

During the last quarter of 2021, Hirschman found these clots in about 130 people. In all, just under 14% of the people he embalmed in that period had no significant clotting; 86% did.

In more recent months, other embalmers have joined Hirschman and started speaking out publicly about these strange fibrous structures they’re now finding. Anna Foster, an embalmer in the U.S., describes pulling out a 3-foot-long fibrous clot out of the carotid artery of one body.

Brenton Faithful, an embalmer in New Zealand, is also seeing them. Another embalmer, Wallace Hooker, gave a presentation on these odd structures at the 2022 Ohio embalmers convention. About 100 embalmers were in attendance, and nearly all of them reported that they too are coming across them.

None of these embalmers have ever, in their many decades of embalming dead bodies, seen these structures before. They only started occurring after the rollout of the COVID shots.

Funeral directors are also starting to speak out. Among them are John O’Looney, a funeral director in the U.K., whose embalmer complained to him that he was having a lot of problems getting the embalming fluid through the body of many. Like Hirschman, this embalmer pulled out long, white, stretchy, fibrous clots, which O’Looney described as having the consistency of calamari.

A Canadian embalmer, whose identity is concealed, reports finding them in 100% of the bodies embalmed over the past year. These clots are not blood clots. They’re white, stringy, stretchy, fibrous structures, but they appear to “feed” on, or grow from, blood clots attached to the ends of them. “And they are massive,” the embalmer says.

The structures take the shape of the vessel they’re forming in, starting off as a tube-shape, like a second lining inside the vessel, and over time fill in, eventually forming a massive blockage.

Aside from heart damage, which we now know is a rather common side effect of the COVID shots, it appears these fibrous structures growing in the arteries and veins of people are another reason for why people are dying suddenly. As they grow larger, they block blood flow, resulting in death.

Mysterious structures in the circulatory system is not the only medical mystery that has embalmers concerned. Hirschman also noticed that some deceased have “dirty blood” — small as-yet unidentified particles that look like fine grains of sand, coffee grounds or rust particles.

These are concerning, as they can enter into and accumulate in capillaries, starving tissues and organs of the oxygen they need. Embalmer Nicky Rupright King describes another similar, yet slightly different, phenomenon. The consistency of blood is different. It’s sticky. She describes the action of the blood on the table as “blood on beach sand.”

Yet another embalmer, whose identity is concealed, describes blood mysteriously separating into a clear liquid with pools or clots of blood in it. (For more information about the potential mechanisms behind this, see A Midwestern Doctor’s critique of the film.4) In other cases, the blood congeals into a jelly-like substance. Needless to say, your body cannot function if your blood is like jelly.

As noted by Hirschman, the reason his and other embalmers’ testimony is so important is because people who die are rarely autopsied, so the embalmers are the only people who get to see these anomalies.

As noted by Lt. Col. Dr. Theresa Long, a U.S. Army flight surgeon and whistleblower, insurance companies predict that if something truly catastrophic occurred in the U.S., we could expect a 10% increase in all-cause mortality.

In the third quarter of 2021, OneAmerica, a national mutual life insurance company based in Indianapolis, reported that the all-cause death rate of working-age Americans (18 to 64) was 40% higher than prepandemic levels, and these deaths are not related to COVID-19.5

As noted by Long, no modeling or calculations have ever been done to account for such a massive increase in all-cause mortality. “It’s apocalyptic,” she says.

In her career as an Army flight surgeon, she also has never before seen such a litany of health problems among soldiers. After the rollout of the COVID shots, soldiers started having strokes, heart attacks, myocarditis, rapid onset cancer, multiple sclerosis, cognitive impairment, miscarriages and much more, at unprecedented rates.

Long suspects that the COVID shots were developed as a lethal weapon, and that they’re doing exactly what they were designed to do. She fears the United States won’t have a standing army five years from now, thanks to the effects of these shots, which were forced onto every rank within the military.

When Long’s concerns were ignored, she, along with Lt. Col. Dr. Peter Chambers, another Army whistleblower, contacted attorney Thomas Renz. They shared with him data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED),6 one of the most well-kept and most heavily-relied upon medical databases in the world.

The data showed that, compared to the previous five-year averages, miscarriages were up 279% among Department of Defense (DOD) personnel in 2021, breast cancer went up 487%, nervous system disorders 1,048%, male infertility 350%, female infertility 471%, ovarian dysfunction 437%. The list goes on.

As noted by Renz during U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson’s “COVID-19: A Second Opinion” panel (see video below):7

“The Whistleblower data, this DMED database, has provided a control group of sorts. It’s military records dating back several years that supply medical codes for various medical issues that our military face such as cancers, miscarriages, neurological disorders etc.

These records provided by three military doctors … show a historical baseline of what the health of the American military was like before 2021, the year the COVID vaccine was released. What you see is quite disturbing.

From 2016 to 2020 all variations of medical conditions stay consistent. But in 2021, when the variable of the vaccine is mandated, the spike in cancers, miscarriages, infertility, you name it, jumps by factors of hundreds to thousands of percent.

Let me be crystal clear. These vaccines are injuring and sometimes even killing our military, and those in the public that are buying the ‘safe and effective’ marketing. These numbers prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.”

Miscarriages Increase 279% Cancer Increases 296%

Johnson put the DOD on notice, demanding these data be preserved and analyzed. But instead, the exact opposite happened. Within 24 hours, the database was taken offline, allegedly to “identify and correct” a supposed data corruption problem, and when it came back, the data had been altered to hide these glaringly obvious safety signals.8 Someone inside the DOD intentionally destroyed one of the best health databases in the world. Why?

The original DMED data showed cancers tripled among servicemen and their family members after the rollout of the COVID shots. Exploding cancer rates are also seen elsewhere. One of the first to warn that the shots might cause cancer was Dr. Ryan Cole.

He believes the shots are primarily accelerating already existing cancers, by way of immune dysregulation.9 He noticed that cancers that could normally be controlled and kept in check, giving the patient several years of quality life, once they got the COVID jab, the cancer would suddenly grow out of control and rapidly lead to death. 

Swedish pathologist, researcher and senior physician at Lund’s University, Dr. Ute Kruger, has also observed an explosion in rapidly advancing cancers in the wake of the COVID shots. For example, she’s noticed:10 11

  • Cancer patients are getting younger — The largest increase is among 30- to 50-year-olds

  • Tumor sizes are dramatically larger — Historically, 3-centimeter tumors were commonly found at the time of cancer diagnosis. Now, the tumors they’re finding are regularly 4 to 12 centimeters, which suggests they’re growing at a much faster rate than normal

  • Multiple tumors in multiple organs are becoming more common

  • Recurrence and metastasis are increasing — Kruger points out that many of the cancer patients she’s seeing have been in remission for years, only to suddenly be beset with uncontrollable cancer growth and metastasis shortly after their COVID jab

These “turbo-cancers,” as Kruger calls them, cannot be explained by delayed cancer screenings due to lockdowns and other COVID restrictions, as those days are long gone. Patients, despite having access to medical screenings as in years past, are showing up with grossly exacerbated tumor growths, and she believes this is because the cancers are being “turbo-charged” by the mRNA jabs.

In June 2020, World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab and Prince Charles formally announced the launch of The Great Reset,12 a eugenicist movement built on the Malthusian premise of global depopulation, thinly veiled under the catch term “sustainable development.”

While most people think of things like recycling, green energy and circular economies when they hear “sustainable development,” the sustainability of world resources is dependent on depopulation.

In the Malthusian equation, you cannot sustain life on planet earth unless you control the population size. So, everything marketed under the banner of sustainable development is part of a eugenics agenda. It’s about depopulation. 

In his book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” Schwab describes how the pandemic serves as the springboard for a global reset into the sustainable system he and his allies have so long envisioned and worked toward.

We know that adherents to Malthusian principles and long-time eugenicist proponents such as Gates and Schwab have had a hand in planning and directing the pandemic response, which just so happens to focus on a wholly unethical marketing campaign of these experimental COVID shots that are now killing perfectly healthy people and driving birth rates off a cliff. Coincidence?

As noted by Steve Kirsch, government regulators, those at the very top who bear the ultimate responsibility for making sure these COVID shots are safe, are actively and intentionally refusing to look at the safety data. Why? Because they want plausible deniability. If everything falls apart, they expect to have the chance to say they were unaware. Data were withheld from them. They didn’t know. The data weren’t clear, and so on.

Well, believe me, there will be no plausible deniability for any of these people. Kirsch has personally ensured that part. He contacted nearly 300 people within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, asking them if they would like to review crucial safety data obtained from Israel. Not a single person replied. They all ignored him.

He has offered $1 million to any health official willing to sit down with him, on camera, to review and discuss the data. None has accepted his offer. He then said they could name their price. What would it take to get someone from the CDC or Food and Drug Administration to sit down and simply review the data, on air? There were no takers.

Kirsch pursued Dr. Grace Lee, chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the highest representative for vaccine safety in the nation, by phone, email and text.

Finally, he went to her home. When she didn’t answer the door, he left a handwritten note taped to her door, asking if she would be willing to look at the Israeli data showing causality between the COVID shots and systemic injuries. She called the police on him. There’s not a snowball’s chance in hell that Lee will be able to claim plausible deniability.

In addition to increasing the death rate, the COVID shots are also lowering birth rates. Infertility in both men and women is up. Miscarriages are up. Premature births are up and neonatal deaths are up. Whistleblowers in the film include Michelle Gershon, a registered nurse at a postpartum ward in a major hospital in Fresno, California, and OBGYN Dr. James Thorp, who has been in practice for 43 years.

Gershon blew the whistle when she received an email from the hospital administration stating there had been 22 fetal demises in August 2022, and that fetal demises were projected to increase, month over month. Normally, they would see between one and two fetal demises every two to three months.

Thorp points out that during his career, the number of stillbirths in the U.S. came down from about 10 to 5.8 per 1,000. In 2020, the rate of stillbirths at Gershon’s hospital suddenly started climbing skyward, in 2021 hitting 29.3 per 1,000 — a 40+ sigma standard deviation from the norm. The mathematical probability of this occurring is zero %.

Data from a Canadian hospital is even worse. They’re now at 41.5 fetal demises per 1,000, a 71.4 standard deviation increase. Thorp also reports a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities, and a substantial increase in horrific birth defects. He’s also seeing fetuses having heart attacks in the womb.

The thing is, Pfizer’s own trial data revealed shocking outcomes for pregnant women. Out of 274 pregnancy cases, only one birth was reported as normal. Pfizer and the FDA tried to hide the trial data upon which the shots were authorized for 75 years, but were forced by a judge to release them.

Meanwhile, the CDC claims the COVID jab is safe for pregnant women and their babies, and that no safety signals exist. Why did the FDA and Pfizer want to keep the data secret for 75 years? Why is the CDC claiming the complete opposite of what the data show? Is it because depopulation is an expected and desired outcome of the shots?

“It’s my professional medical opinion that this is a bioweapon … unleashed against humanity with the intent to depopulate and control the population of the world. ~ Lt. Col. Dr. Theresa Long”

Across the world, live births have plummeted since the rollout of the shots. Most countries report decreases between 10% and 15%, such as Germany, Norway, Greece, Finland, Sweden and England. Taiwan’s decline is around 23%. Australia, for some reason, has far surpassed everyone else in this regard, reporting a shocking 72% decline in live births, nine months after the COVID jab campaign began.13

Speaking of the COVID shots, Long says:

“It’s my professional medical opinion that this is a bioweapon, and that this was a bioweapon unleashed against humanity with the intent to depopulate and control the population of the world.”

Dr. Peter McCullough agrees. “It’s achieving its goal,” he says. “If the goal was to reduce the world’s population, it’s working.” O’Looney adds:

“This was well-planned. This is Agenda 2030. This is The Great Reset. This is what it’s all about. One of the hardest things about knowing what I know is accepting that people are going to die, because they’re not going to believe it …

This is probably the most Biblical event anyone could imagine. This is World War III. This is spiritual war — good against evil. And I just hope there’s enough good in the world that we can rally to defeat it, because if we don’t, this will destroy humanity.”

Subscribe to Mercola Newsletter

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

Rancid Piles of Donated Clothes Litter Developing Countries

rancid clothing

  • Donated clothing enters a stream of garments, many of which are shipped to poor countries where they are sorted and sold or dumped in landfills creating small mountains of waste along beaches

  • Fast fashion, or cheap copies of high fashion garments sold at affordable prices, is a large contributor to the fashion industry’s dirty secret that only 1% of all clothing is recycled and most textiles ultimately end up in landfills

  • The fashion industry’s goal is to make people unhappy with their clothing and feed an addiction to purchasing new clothes as often as possible. Although several companies are exploring the idea of renting clothing, this fundamentally means the clothing must be well-made and durable

  • You can lower the impact of fast fashion by taking several steps, including purchasing high-quality, sustainably made clothing, repairing and reusing your clothes, swapping and exchanging clothes with friends and family and donating to local charities that keep the clothing in your community

Visit Mercola Market

Advertisement

Studies conducted during the on-again, off-again lockdowns of COVID-19 revealed how damaging social isolation was to most people. A reporter from The Conversation1 did an informal review of 33 published studies that included nearly 132,000 people from around the world and found that social restrictions increase your risk of depression over 4.5 times and the odds you would experience loneliness nearly doubled.

During this time, many people turned to what has been called “retail therapy,” or shopping for clothing, much of which occurred online during the lockdowns. While some suggest that buying new clothes could make you feel better, most people agree those positive feelings seldom last long.

What does last is the impact fast fashion has on your pocketbook and the environment. Underneath all the glamor in the store windows and beautiful photos online are dirty secrets the fashion industry doesn’t want you to know or understand. If you’re like many people, you haven’t considered what happens to your clothes after you donate them.2

You might feel like you’re doing your part by donating unwanted clothes to charity or dropping them off at a take-back bin. But the sad reality is that a large portion of these discarded clothes simply ends up in a landfill somewhere.3 The overabundance of donated clothing is the result of the push for cheap clothing by manufacturers whose sole goal is to create demand and boost their income. These actions have made them a major contributor to environmental pollution.4

In 2014, Americans bought 500% more clothing than in the 1980s5 and Canadians bought 400% more clothing.6 Although the problem is significant, there are potentially effective options from which to choose. Before discussing these ideas, let’s discover why it’s crucial we make changes to the way we buy, use, and discard clothing.

Stacy Dooley is a BBC investigative reporter whose 2018 documentary, “Fashion’s Dirty Secrets,”7 shone a light on the damage retail therapy is doing in developing countries. You might be surprised to learn that fashion is second only to oil as the top five most polluting industries in the world.

As shops can quickly produce copies of high fashion items at affordable prices, people are tempted to update their look. This feeds their insatiable appetite, increasing the potential that retail therapy becomes even more addictive. Unfortunately, of the massive amount of fast fashion that reaches take-back bins and charity shops, less than 1% will eventually get recycled into new garments.

Much of the cast-offs ends up along the coast of Ghana, which Bloomberg reports is one of the largest importers of used clothing.8 As clothing gets cheaper and more disposable, the fashion industry produces more than 100 billion items each year. Bloomberg reports this is approximately 14 pieces of clothing for every person walking the Earth. Shockingly, this is more than twice the number produced just a little over 20 years ago in 2000.

Once the clothing arrives, it undergoes sorting by brokers and processors whose business is to export the clothing to developing countries where it will be purchased and worn. Once clothing has entered the deluge of garments transported to Ghana and India, there is no way to track what happens to it.

Mark Burrows Smith, chief executive officer of Textile Recycling International, spoke with a reporter from Bloomberg, noting that in his experience with a company that processes 400 million garments annually in the U.K. and Ireland,9 “I think it needs to be understood that all textiles, whether new or recycled, will ultimately end up in landfill. The key is to keep the garment in use as long as possible.”

The cast-offs that arrive by the bale from industrialized nations are known in Ghana as obroni wawu, or dead white people’s clothes. It’s almost incomprehensible to the people of Ghana that so much clothing could be thrown away.

Accra is the capital of Ghana and just south is Chorkor Beach along the Gulf of Guinea. There you’ll find a wall of clothing more than 6 feet high. The rags have been packed down through exposure to the weather and are degrading in a putrid pile. It is here that people have built a small town on a foundation of rags.

Solomon Noi is the city’s head of Waste Management and he believes that 40% of all the used clothing that moves through the port of Accra is not worn or repurposed. Although the country doesn’t have the infrastructure to take care of the waste, banning the imports would shut down a trade that supports many people’s livelihoods.

Old clothing rarely gets recycled into new garments because the technology does not exist to handle the waste produced at scale. Additionally, different fibers require different chemicals to break down the product for recycling. Many garments are made with two or three types of fiber, making recycling nearly impossible.10

Instead, clothing enters a supply chain supported by workers in third-world countries to prolong the life of the material before it eventually ends up in a landfill or piled high along the beach. The recycling myth was created and perpetuated by companies that want people to continue to purchase clothing without feeling guilty about what happened to the clothes they discard.

Bloomberg reports11 that in 2013, H&M began a used clothing collection program across 40 countries to tap into growing environmental awareness. The H&M’s blog once claimed: “H&M will recycle them and create new textile fiber, and in return you get vouchers to use at H&M.”12

Today, H&M acknowledges that only 1% of garments collected are recycled each year and most end up in landfills,13 but the damage has already been done. Other fashion chains began their own recycling campaigns and none acknowledged that the capability of recycling at that scale did not exist. In 1950, New York department store tycoon, Earl Puckett said:14

“It’s our job to make women unhappy with what they have in the way of apparel. Basic utility cannot be the foundation of a prosperous apparel industry. We must accelerate obsolescence.”

In 1974, Norman Wechsler, president of Saks Fifth Avenue, said obsolescence in women’s fashion was “the name of the game.”15 By the 1980s, the Spanish clothing company Zara had pioneered a model that allowed them to roll out thousands of designs each year.

The new production model changed the shopping habits of Zara consumers as they began visiting the store four times the usual number each year. A 2007 study16 found that the company had inadvertently tapped into strategies that support addictive behavior.

The researchers found that the decision to purchase a product was related to how much the individual anticipated they would gain and lose. A consumer purchase could be predicted by looking at specific patterns of brain activation that showed they weighed a combination of preference for the item and price considerations. In other words, your brain likes to find a bargain.

Bloomberg reports17 that in the past 20 years, the average number of times a person wears their clothes before getting rid of them has dropped by 36%. In America, that equates to wearing clothing less than 50 times on average. In China, the average number of times an individual wore their clothes dropped from over 200 to just 62 times.

With a greater eye on the environmental impact, several companies have explored the idea of renting your wardrobe. The business model is described by researchers as “providing consumers with the ability to focus on using their products instead of ownership.”18 One research team surveyed 362 adults19 born between 1997 and 2002 and found the attitude of the Gen Z consumer helped mediate the intention to use a rental service.

However, while this may help feed the consumer’s desire for new clothing and keep a particular garment in circulation longer, the fundamental idea of rental clothing means the garment must be well-made and durable.

The fashion industry used to have four seasons but today collections are updated on a nearly weekly basis. In a 2018 CBC Marketplace report,20 journalist Charlsie Agro investigated the claims made by retail take-back programs and took a Canadian family behind the scenes to show them the journey clothes donated at their local charity take on the way to Africa or India.

Claudia Marsales, senior manager of waste and environmental management for Markham, Ontario, believes the take-back programs are a losing proposition and nothing more than a form of greenwashing. It does nothing to address “the broken business model of fast fashion,”21 and is really just circumventing rather than addressing the real problems.

In short, the industry business model is the root issue, and recycling programs are a simple way to make the industry appear more responsible without actually altering the way they do business.

In addition to being chemically dependent and conventionally produced, cotton also needs water — lots of water. Chemicals and toxic dyes are released from these textiles, adding to our global water pollution problem. At the end of the day, the answer to lowering global waste lies with every individual doing their part to reduce total consumption.

The solution requires consumers to purchase high-quality, sustainably made clothing that is cared for and worn much longer than fast fashion. When you purchase clothes, seek fabrics that are made with organic cotton, hemp, silk, wool and bamboo. Consider exchanging clothing with your family and friends, especially when you have clothes hanging in your closet that have not been worn for more than 6 months.

Find ways to repair and reuse your clothing and consider selling or swapping online. Keep in mind that most donated clothing ends up in landfills, so consider seeking out reputable charities that serve the needs of your local community, such as your local church.

In the past I didn’t give much thought to my clothing, but I’ve since dedicated myself to wearing sustainably produced organic clothing and supporting the “Care What You Wear” movement through Regeneration International.22 I added a line of organic clothing grown and sewn in the USA to my webstore, and we support the SITO brand — a GOTS-certified organic clothing brand by the biodynamic certification agency Demeter.

The Mercola-RESET Biodynamic Organic Project is also helping 55 certified organic farmers in India convert to biodynamic production of cotton on 110 acres of land. Biodynamic farming is organic by nature, but it goes even further, operating on the premise that the farm is regenerative and entirely self-sustaining.

Biodynamic farming brings animals and plants together to form a living web of life, a self-sustaining ecosystem that benefits the surrounding community. RESET (Regenerate, Environment, Society, Economy, Textiles) will pay all organic biodynamic farmers in our project a 25% premium over conventional cotton prices, which will be paid directly to the farmers.

So, going forward, give some serious thought to cleaning up and “greening” your wardrobe. Your choices as a consumer will help guide the fashion industry toward more humane and environmentally sane manufacturing processes, and not just stopping short at a façade of sustainability through take-back recycling programs that do very little to curtail our global textile waste and environmental pollution problems.

Subscribe to Mercola Newsletter

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.