Egg Prices Surge to Record Heights as Unprecedented Bird Flu Persists

Newsmax | Dec. 26, 2022

Egg prices are reaching record heights, driven by an avian-influenza outbreak that killed tens of millions of chickens and turkeys this year in the U.S.

According to the research firm Urner Barry, the wholesale price of Midwest large eggs sits at $5.36 a dozen as of this December. Retail prices have climbed more than 30% from January to early December compared to the year before.

Eggs are a staple product for supermarkets, similar to milk and butter. Grocers have been sacrificing profits on eggs to keep consumers’ prices competitive and retain store traffic. Some supplies believe potential relief in price will come February or March, but cold weather could hamper production in the near term, according to executives.

(***)

Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial

Senior Editor of TheBlaze Daniel Horowitz sits down DailyClout Associate Editor Etana Hecht.

Daniel never dreamed of commentating on viruses and vaccines, but the Covid-19 debacle forced his hand. He says that the divide in this country is no longer traditional right vs. left; it’s really up vs. down.




Become a DailyClout Member

Donate

The post Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial appeared first on DailyClout.

Rise of the Fourt Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial

Senior Editor of TheBlaze Daniel Horowitz sits down DailyClout Associate Editor Etana Hecht.

Daniel never dreamed of commentating on viruses and vaccines, but the Covid-19 debacle forced his hand. He says that the divide in this country is no longer traditional right vs. left; it’s really up vs. down.




Become a DailyClout Member

Donate

The post Rise of the Fourt Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial appeared first on DailyClout.

Now everyone can easily prove the vax should be stopped

Now, with a simple four question survey, anyone can prove for themselves the vaccines should be stopped. So if you don’t believe me, collect your own data.

My data showed that, among other things, “died suddenly” wasn’t an issue for those <65 who were unvaccinated in 2021 and 2022. But it was the #1 cause of death for those in that age group who were vaccinated. How will they explain that?

Have you ever wondered why isn’t anyone in the mainstream media or any public health authority doing this simple survey? It’s simple: it would reveal that the vaccines killed more people than COVID did. That would destroy trust in the medical community, members of Congress, the mainstream media, state and local legislators and public health officials, government health organizations (CDC, FDA, NIH, …). That’s why they will not do this survey. They will never do this survey.

Note that my physician office survey is the most telling because of the professional judgments as to the cause of deaths. The advantage to this method is that people can run their own surveys and see the anomalies for themselves.

My latest survey shows you don’t need to be a math genius to figure out whether the COVID vaccines are safe or not. You just survey people and ask four questions about anyone who died in 2020 and beyond:

  1. Age

  2. Whether they were vaccinated with the COVID vaccine

  3. Year of death

  4. Causes of death

That subset of my survey is all you need.

  1. I used a filter condition of RecordID <= 1260 AND country = USA and Integrity=1 (it passed various sanity checks). This way, my charts are repeatable if records are added to the database.

  2. For age ranges: <65 and 65 and older, I show three charts: 2020 causes of death, 2021/2 unvaxxed causes of death, and 2021/2 vaxxed causes of death. If the vaccine is perfectly “safe and effective” like they say, the vaxxed will have a shape that only differs from the others with a lower COVID death rate. Ignore the scale on the graphs… it’s the overall “shape” of the various death causes that matters, not the absolute number of reports. For example, here’s the first chart.

And here is the final chart filter condition:

Note that the columns don’t line up because Airtable omits them if they are zero.

Note: Click each chart below to see it full size.

Age <=65, Died in 2020
Note: Cancer is the #1 killer (nearly double the next leading cause of death), Hospital treatments for COVID is next, Cardiac related and sudden death are around equal. The COVID the virus is next. Turbo cancers, pulmonary embolism, heart attack, unknown cause of death are all low and comparable to each other. Turbo cancer is 1/9 of cancer reports. No myocarditis deaths.

Age >65, Died in 2020

Note: Pre-existing conditions are the top cause of death. Cancer is next. COVID is next. Cardiac issues are the next. Cardiac related and sudden death are around equal. The COVID the virus is next. pulmonary embolism, heart attack, unknown cause of death are all low and comparable to each other. There are NO turbo cancer deaths!! No myocarditis deaths.

Age <=65, Died > 2020
Hospital treatments for COVID are the #1 killer. People who died suddenly, pulmonary embolism, and turbo cancers are all very low. There are no unknown causes of death. No myocarditis deaths.

Age >65, Died > 2020
Hospital treatment for COVID is the #1 killer. Heart attack, turbo cancer, and died suddenly are all low. There are no myocarditis deaths.

Age <=65, Died > 2020

Died suddenly is now the #1 cause of death, followed closely by cardiac-related death. Stop right there. This should be a showstopper.

Cancer is next. Turbo cancer is now significant compared to what it was before. Myocarditis is now a player and is killing more than COVID.

Age >65, Died > 2020

Cancer is the #1 cause of death. Turbo cancers are huge compared to those without the vaccine. Died suddenly is significantly elevated.

If these charts look the same to you, you should immediately apply for a job at the CDC in the vaccine safety monitoring program.

If you are a “misinformation spreader” like me, you’ll see some huge differences for the vaccinated including:

  1. Sudden death rates are off the charts for the vaccinated cf. unvaccinated for those <65. This is stunning. It’s the #1 cause of death for this age group. This is not surprising as we are seeing this every day.

  2. Myocarditis as a cause of death is registering now for both age ranges but only for the vaccinated. The doctors assure us it is lower in the vaccinated, but that’s not what the data says, and I can’t find a single cardiologist whose number of myocarditis cases went down after the vaccines rolled out.

  3. Cardiac issues as a cause of death in vaccinated young people (<65) are significantly elevated vs. their unvaxxed peers.

It’s no wonder that nearly all the cardiologists in the UK aren’t getting any more boosters.

I’m sure Joel Smalley and others will be able to do more sophisticated analysis (and do so on more than just the causes of death), but the graphs above show the vaccines aren’t “safe and effective,” not even close.

Other analyses (using other methods) should consider:

  1. You need to compare vaxxed v. unvaxxed by age group since higher portions of the elderly are vaxxed

  2. In 2020, everyone is unvaxxed so there will be NO vaccinated deaths in 2020.

  3. Comparing vaxxed deaths in 2021 + 2022 to all deaths in 2020 would be fair if we look at the relative death causes. If we are looking at absolute numbers, there will be some recall bias so need to account for that.

  4. The population of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed changes over 2021. So when comparing the absolute number of deaths, we need to account for that.

  5. Vaccines in other countries may not be as dangerous so keep in mind the region. If the analysis is repeatable by region, that’s telling.

  6. There are a lot of things you can look at including the bias of the reporter, e.g., will triple vaccinated reporters find fewer attributes for death causes.

  7. This is not a complete list. The point is if you want to go beyond this analysis, you should know what you are doing so you don’t spread misinformation.

Loads of data now appearing on how the vaccines damage your immune response:

  1. See URGENT: Two new studies show mRNA-jabbed people have a much higher risk of getting Covid than unvaccinated people

  2. are covid vaccines causing persistent covid?

  3. This is a short piece by Karl Denninger

  4. Original more technical post by Rintrah – The trainwreck of all trainwrecks: Billions of people stuck with a broken immune response

  5. Here is an easy to read write up by Igor Chudov: Booster-Caused IgG4 Immune Tolerance Explains Excess Mortality and “Chronic Covid” In the Covid-Boosted

As Igor would say, “Perhaps giving unproven vaccines to billions was a bad idea, after all.” And now a top Israeli scientist (vaccinated 3 times) speaks out

  1. Gather more data

  2. Complete more analyses

  3. Present the data into a form where you can see the differences more clearly, e.g., looking at each cause of death and comparing the normalized numbers for the three cases (2020, unvaxxed, vaxxed). So we’d show 3 bars for each cause of death normalized to some factor that is not closely related to the vaccine, such as people dying from obesity or accidents.

I wanted to put this out now so others know what signals to look for (and because I have a Twitter debate coming up on Wednesday).

More analyzes forthcoming, but just in looking at the “cause of death” profile, we can clearly see very large safety signals in the vaccinated that are consistent with what we’ve been saying since early 2021: the vaccines are unsafe and should be halted. None of the elevations in rates for causes come as any surprise at all; they confirm our previous results.

We also see that hospital treatments for COVID are killing massive numbers of people as well.

In short, our interventions (vaccines, standardized hospital COVID treatments) made things worse, not better.

If we had promoted early treatment protocols, we’d have been much better off. But that would mean the vaccine wouldn’t be approved, so nobody was interested in verifying the patient records of those treated with these protocols.

Will anyone replicate this survey? No. There is nothing for them to gain by doing so and everything to lose.

Will any state release the cause of death and vax status for everyone who died in their state? Of course not! John Beaudoin offered to do the correlation for free for any state that would give him access to the records, but no state was interested because they don’t want to know.

So you’ll only find this data here for now.

Please encourage your friends to fill out the survey so we can collect even more data and make the results even more compelling. This survey collects a lot of data so it can be analyzed in many different ways. We definitely will need more people to fill this out to get compelling results.

Share

Pfizer’s Shots Aren’t Safe and Were Never Shown To Be

Episode 298: BRINGING THE HEAT

  • Dr. Kathryn Edwards, a member of Pfizer’s data safety monitoring board (DSMB), was previously a paid adviser to Pfizer. DSMBs are supposed to be independent, and aren’t if members have previous relationships with the company

  • German autopsies found “highly unusual tissue inflammation” in people who died shortly after getting the jab, and investigators suspect the inflammation observed would be fatal. They also found spike protein in the tissues of the deceased, but not another key part of SARS-CoV-2. This suggests the actual virus was not part of the problem; the only possible source of the spike protein was the jab

  • Data from the German health insurance provider BKK, which covers about 10.9 million Germans, show 2.05% of COVID jab recipients sought medical care after their jab

  • The largest German statutory health insurance dataset, which encompasses 72 million Germans, show massive increases in sudden and unexpected deaths after the COVID jabs rolled out

  • December 13, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for a statewide grand jury investigation of crimes and wrongdoing committed against Floridians related to the COVID-19 jabs. He also established an independent Public Health Integrity Committee to analyze and assess federal health guidance before they’re implemented in Florida

Visit Mercola Market

Advertisement

Contrary to the official narrative (and hence popular belief), the COVID shots have no demonstrated safety. In Episode 298 of The Highwire, Del Bigtree interviews attorney Aaron Siri about the various lawsuits his firm has brought to reverse COVID jab mandates.

Siri describes a recent deposition of Dr. Kathryn Edwards, a world-leading vaccinologist who sat on Pfizer’s data safety monitoring board (DSMB). This five-member committee oversaw the safety of Pfizer’s jab. A DSMB is supposed to be an independent group of experts, whose responsibility it is to monitor patient safety and treatment efficacy data while a clinical trial is ongoing.

As noted by Siri in the deposition, since the DSMB is supposed to be independent, it’s crucially important that all the members of that board have no potential conflicts of interest and are in fact truly independent of the drug company whose product they’re evaluating.

In the case of Edwards, she was a paid adviser to Pfizer before she was hired (by Pfizer) to be on the DSMB for their COVID jab. According to Edwards, this fact is irrelevant, because that prior relationship did not influence the work she did on the board.

“I say what I believe based on my expertise,” she told Siri. “So, you don’t think financial incentive can sway people’s judgment at all?” Siri asked. “It does not sway my judgment, Sir,” she replied. “Then why have an independent DSMB?” Siri asked. “Why doesn’t Pfizer just have some of its employees on it?”

“Because we are independent; we are independent from Pfizer in this assessment,” she replied. But just how can an independent advisory committee possibly be “independent” if members have prior relationships with the company?

Another noteworthy tidbit from that deposition was Edwards’ comment that she reviewed “lots of reactions and adverse events” from the COVID jab trial. Yet the public has continuously been told there are no bad reactions. So, what was she looking at? And why, if there were “lots of reactions,” did the DSMB conclude that there are no safety concerns?

Of course, we know at least some of what she was looking at. Pfizer trial documents1 have been released showing the company amassed nine single-spaced pages’ worth of “adverse events of special interest” (see pages 30 through 382), including 1,223 events with fatal outcomes between December 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021 alone.

A whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial has also come forward with evidence showing data were falsified, patients were unblinded and follow-up on reported side effects lagged way behind. Why didn’t any of these issues concern the DSMB? Was it because there really was no independent DSMB?

In a mid-December 2022 Substack article, the anonymous writer who goes by the moniker “A Midwestern Doctor” reviewed German autopsy data, which demonstrate:3

  • The presence of “highly unusual tissue inflammation” in people who died shortly after getting the jab. As noted by the author, “Pathologists had not observed this phenomena before the COVID-19 vaccines, and they suspected this inflammation would be fatal.”

  • The presence of COVID spike protein in the tissues of the deceased, whereas another key part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was absent. This suggests the actual virus was not part of the problem; the only possible source of the spike protein was the jab.

The most recent and “most definitive” study on this subject, according to A Midwestern Doctor, examined 35 people who died within 20 days of getting the COVID jab. After thorough autopsy examination, 10 of the deceased were determined to have died from causes other than the jab.

Among the remaining 25, most died from causes that, in general, have frequently been linked to vaccination. Five died from myocarditis, which could potentially be linked to the shot. In three of those five cases, the COVID jab was determined to be the definitive cause of the myocarditis that led to their death.

As noted by A Midwestern Doctor, “These results are very important for convicting the vaccines if it can also be proven that a large number of unexpected deaths are occurring following vaccination.” As it turns out, that’s exactly what excess mortality data tell us.

A Midwestern Doctor also cites data from the German health insurance provider, BKK, which covers about 10.9 million Germans. One of the BKK board members, Andreas Shöfbeck, discovered concerning trends in their data, which he sent to the Paul-Ehrlich Institut, an agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health.

No good deed goes unpunished in the era of COVID censorship, however, so Shöfbeck was summarily dismissed from the board as thanks for his contribution to public health and safety. The BKK dataset showed 2.05% of COVID jab recipients sought medical care after their jab. A Midwestern Doctor continues:4

“This concerning safety signal prompted … the AfD [Alternative for Germany, a conservative political party] … to file the German equivalent of FOIA [Freedom of Information Act request] for the rest of the insurance data …

Recently AfD obtained AOK Sachsen-Anhalt’s data, which once analyzed, demonstrated that many of the conditions we associate with COVID-19 injuries noticeably increased when the vaccination campaign initiated … [C]onditions which rose five-fold or more were:”

conditions associated with COVID-19

“AfD also submitted a FOIA request to KBV, the association which represents all physicians who receive insurance in Germany and thus the largest insurance dataset available.”

The larger statutory health insurance dataset from KBV, which encompasses 72 million Germans, show massive increases in sudden and unexpected deaths after the COVID jabs rolled out.

The following graph is from a press conference presentation by data analyst Tom Lausen (see video below; it’s in German, but you can enable English subtitles).5 No mainstream media attended the press conference.

experimental covid vaccines

As noted by A Midwestern Doctor:6

“… one way that individuals have analyzed the unusual changes in health following the vaccination campaigns has been to assess how far they fall outside of the expected range of variation …

I did a quick calculation for the above graph and found that 2021’s increase from 2016-2020 was 37.7σ [sigma], while 2022’s was 41.0σ. This is quite a big deal (the rarity of an event happening by chance increases exponentially as the σ increases).

For context, a 7σ event has a 1/390,632,286,180 chance of spontaneously occurring (it is thought to occur once in a billion years) … (I was not able to find a reference on the probabilities for the even higher σ events observed here).

Given these numbers, it is very difficult to argue that these events were not caused by something. In this regard, we are also quite fortunate that while the vaccines were rushed to the market over a period of time far too short to establish safety, that process still took a year.

Because of this lag, it is possible to refute the commonly cited argument that these changes were due to COVID-19 or the lockdowns, as these only occurred in 2020 …”

Lausen also presented a graph for German fatalities per quarter involving cardiac problems.7 8 These six death certificate codes all correspond to “sudden deaths” with cardiac cause. As you can see, heart-related mortality more than doubled in the first quarter of 2021 from the year before, and nearly tripled from the five-year average.

german fatalities

Some have argued that since few shots were given in early 2021, heart-related deaths would not have increased until the second quarter if there was a correlation between the two. However, other data show there was a rapid rise in COVID jab doses administered during the first quarter of 2021 (see graph below), so it’s not outside the realm of possibility that there is a correlation.

Also, as with all-cause mortality, the fact that heart-related deaths did NOT spike during 2020 suggests COVID-19 had nothing to do with the rise that occurred in the first quarter of 2021.

daily COVID-19 vaccine doses administered

In the conclusion of his presentation, Lausen calls for the immediate suspension of the COVID jabs until correlation between the shots and death can be conclusively ruled out. He also calls for:9

  • Autopsies on all who died suddenly to determine what the massive increase is due to

  • Mandatory recording of the COVID jab status of all deceased individuals, and the brand used, and regular publication of these data

  • Immediate evaluation of the KBV data by German health authorities

  • Informing all doctors and the population at large about the increase in diseases being reported post-jab

  • Regular publication of KB e V data linked with COVID jab data held by the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute (Germany’s public health institute)

In addition to not being safe, by any standard, the COVID shots are also negatively effective, meaning after 90 days, both Moderna’s and Pfizer’s shots make you more susceptible to COVID.

As shown in the graphic below, Danish data reveal Omicron cases among the jabbed rose dramatically after three months for both injections, giving Pfizer a negative effectiveness of 76.5% at 90 days’ post-jab and Moderna a 39.3% negative effectiveness.

pfizer moderna negative effectiveness

As noted in a series of Twitter posts by Chris Martenson Ph.D.:10

“If you’ve been vaccinated, and feel like you’ve been getting sick more often than your unvaccinated friends, your impression is correct … The only rational, scientific, ethical, and moral response is to #StoptheShotsNow for everyone under 50 who is healthy. Anything less is profiteering, politics, or personal failure. Or assault and/or homicide if you’re a doctor.”

I’ve reviewed data on side effects and excess mortality in the U.S. in several previous articles, and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently did what many of us have been calling for in light of those data.

December 13, 2022, he petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for a statewide grand jury investigation of crimes and wrongdoing committed against Floridians related to the COVID-19 jabs.11 According to the governor’s press release:12

“The pharmaceutical industry and the FDA have refused to release patient-level data for independent researchers.

Meanwhile, the COVID-19 vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna have received FDA approval for pediatric and adult patients and continue to be marketed as safe and effective, even though the vaccines do not prevent transmission and adverse events have been minimized and disregarded by the Biden Administration and Big Pharma.

In response, Governor DeSantis has filed a petition to impanel a statewide grand jury to investigate crimes and wrongs in Florida related to the COVID-19 vaccines and further recommend enforcement methods.”

DeSantis is also implementing autopsy surveillance of post-jab sudden deaths, and has established a Public Health Integrity Committee, an independent group of expert researchers “charged with assessing federal decisions, recommendations, and guidance related to public health and health care … to ensure that Florida’s public health policies are tailored for Florida’s communities and priorities.”

The Committee, which will be overseen by Florida surgeon general Dr. Joseph Ladapo, consists of the following members:

  • Jay Bhattacharya, MD, Ph.D.

  • Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D.

  • Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, Ph.D.

  • Joseph Fraiman, MD

  • Christine Stabell Benn, MD, Ph.D.

  • Bret Weinstein, Ph.D.

  • Steven Templeton, Ph.D.

As noted in the governor’s press release:13

“The Biden Administration and pharmaceutical corporations continue to push widespread distribution of mRNA vaccines on the public, including children as young as 6 months old, through relentless propaganda while ignoring real-life adverse events.

At today’s roundtable the Governor and health experts discussed data covering serious adverse events. These risks include coagulation disorders, acute cardiac injuries, Bell’s palsy, encephalitis, appendicitis, and shingles.

‘Health care professionals should always communicate the risks of a medical intervention to their patients in a manner that is clinically appropriate and meets standards of ethical practice. President Biden and Big Pharma have completely prevented that from happening – it is wrong,’ said Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo.

‘With these new actions, we will shed light on the forces that have obscured truthful communication about the COVID-19 vaccines.'”

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.