Clay Clark tells Dave Daubenmire: Globalists want to take full financial control – Brighteon.TV

Image: Clay Clark tells Dave Daubenmire: Globalists want to take full financial control – Brighteon.TV

(Natural News) ReAwaken America Tour founder and “Thrive Time Show” host Clay Clark exposed the globalists’ plan of taking full financial control through a series of engineered events all over the world, most notably the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

During the December 26 episode of “Pass The Salt” on Brighteon.TV, Clark told host Dave Daubenmire how the Switzerland-based World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder Klaus Schwab have been publicly promoting their Great Reset agenda.

“The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test is falsely calibrated to inflate the cases because COVID-19’s entire purpose is to put a certificate of vaccination ID [artificial intelligence] AI under your skin,” he revealed.

Clark shared that Todd Callender, a lawyer fighting against COVID-19 public health mandates, told him that the under-the-skin surveillance has already been carried out on most Americans through the mRNA vaccines.

“And then he goes on to explain that inside the [COVID-19] shots, there are modifying nanotechnology that connects humans to 5G,” Clark said. “So when you see a 5G tower, if you have an RNA modifying nanotechnology shot in your body, you now are emitting what’s called a Mac score immediate access code.”

This means that people are now being tracked wherever they are going. Clark added that the final step of the globalists to gain full financial control is the introduction of the central bank digital currency (CBDC).

According to Clark, the CBDCs were developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which was funded by the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Big Tech mogul Bill Gates.


Clark also connected current economic events to the globalists’ plan, such as the 40-year high inflation and the recent collapse of cryptocurrency giant FTX.

Now that the money laundering is done, Clark noted that Quant Network CEO Gilbert Verdian is now telling the public how CBDCs would improve the global payments infrastructure.

“He [Verdian] said the only way to avoid a crisis like this in the future is to roll out CBDCs, which would work by putting a chip under your skin,” Clark said. (Related: German economist: WEF plans to impose SOCIAL CREDIT system under the guise of “humanitarian act.”)

Daubenmire: America’s justice system is not fair

Elsewhere in the show, Daubenmire mentioned how unfair it is that disgraced FTX co-funder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) walked out of federal court unscathed and essentially a free man, while the people who exercised their rights at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 are still in prison.

It was not exactly a big surprise because SBF was a major donor for Democrats in past elections.

According to CoinDesk, SBF was not even required to post a conventional bail bond. Instead, he was simply released from custody on something called a personal recognizance bond, which contains his “solemn promise” (and his parents’ promise) to pay the court $250 million if he fails to show up for trial at the appointed time.

It was that easy, Daubenmire noted. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said with the January 6 (J6) demonstrators.

“The Constitution guarantees us one of the five amendments, the Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or freedom of the press, freedom of speech. And then at the bottom of it, it says, ‘And the right of the people to peaceably assemble to petition their government for a redress of grievances,’” Daubenmire said.

He stressed that the J6 demonstrators were not planning to overthrow a government. “How do you overthrow a government? How do you have an armed insurrection if nobody has a weapon? The weapons were bull horns, flags and banners,” he pointed out.

Follow for more news related to the globalists’ plans of gaining full financial control.

Watch the full December 26 episode of “Pass the Salt” with Coach Dave Daubenmire featuring Clay Clark below. Catch new episodes of the program every Monday at 11:00 a.m. on Brighteon.TV.

More related stories:

Clay Clark warns public of possible weaponization of US monetary system.

Microchip implanted in your hand? Why worry?

Clay Clark drops TRUTH BOMBS involving globalist elites and the fulfillment of Scriptures.

Trump COVID official describes mRNA vaccine as a ‘biological weapon.’

Sources include:

Gain-of-function means bioweapon: Musk blasts Fauci for overseeing creation of COVID-19

Image: Gain-of-function means bioweapon: Musk blasts Fauci for overseeing creation of COVID-19

(Natural News) Twitter CEO Elon Musk blasted President Joe Biden’s outgoing Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci on Wednesday, December 28, for overseeing the creation of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) bioweapon that has killed millions around the world.

“Important to note that Fauci authored a 2012 paper arguing for gain-of-function research,” Musk tweeted. He then cited an article published by Yahoo on March 2021, where Fauci backed the gain-of-function experiments based on his paper written back in 2012.

According to Fauci, the research is “important work” and the benefits of such experiments as well as the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

“Some good nuggets in the article. ‘Gain-of-function‘ in this context is just another way of saying ‘bioweapon,’” the tech mogul pointed out.

In the paper, the retiring National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director said such research involves making viruses more infectious and/or deadly.

A lot of experts have been coming out with analyses that found the possibility of COVID-19 to have originated from a potential lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, China, where gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses had been conducted.

Musk noted that former President Barack Obama “wisely put this on pause, but Fauci restarted it.” In 2014, the Obama administration paused funding for gain-of-function experiments in 22 fields, including those involving SARS, influenza and MERS because of the increased risk such experimentation carries of causing a pandemic.


When Fauci wrote the paper supporting gain-of-function research, there was a voluntary ban on such experiments related to highly infectious influenza viruses. Yet the EcoHealth Alliance diverted $600,000 in grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the head agency of NIAID, to the WIV in the form of sub-grants from 2014 through 2019 to study bat coronaviruses.

Fauci maintained that no U.S. funding went to WIV for gain-of-function research, but conceded during congressional testimony last year that it was impossible to guarantee that researchers at the WIV did not use American funds to perform gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. (Related: Fauci “knew” he was funding illegal gain-of-function research, says former CDC director.)

Musk hints Fauci needs to be prosecuted

Musk also took a swipe on Fauci earlier in December, saying: “My pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci.” While the post did not include context, it still drew support from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia.

Also, Twitter user @hodgetwins replied to Musk’s tweet: “Let me guess. You found messages between Twitter execs and our government (Fauci and team) pushing for censorship of anyone that didn’t go along with their narrative on COVID?” Musk responded with a trophy emoticon. He also replied with a simple “Yes” when another user inquired if this will be explained in the next set of Twitter Files.

While Musk’s tweet acquired roughly half a million likes in its first few hours online, the post also received backlash. Peter Hotez, a vaccine scientist and virology professor, defended Fauci’s work at the forefront of U.S. pandemic mitigation efforts and urged Musk to remove the post.

“For the record: Dr. Fauci has done nothing wrong, except serve our nation. In the meantime, Mr. Musk should know that 200,000 Americans needlessly lost their lives from COVID due to this kind of antiscience rhetoric and disinformation. Elon, I’m asking you to take down this Tweet,” Hotez wrote. Musk has not responded publicly.

About an hour before posting the tweet about Fauci, Musk shared a meme with a caption that read in part, “Just one more lockdown,” which could be interpreted as an allusion to Fauci’s advocacy for safety mandates that public health experts, including those in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, agreed were helpful in slowing the spread of COVID-19 before vaccines became widely available.

Check out to know more about the COVID-19 bioweapon.

Watch the video below that talks about how the White House panics after Musk slams Fauci’s funding of the gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

This video is from the NewsClips on

More related stories:

Australian agency admits involvement in gain-of-function projects, wants government to legalize bioweapons research.

NIH awards new grant to group behind covid gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

SUICIDE SCIENCE: Boston University creates new chimeric COVID bioweapon with 80% KILL RATE… has humanity learned NOTHING?

Research group says covid is “biological warfare” by the CCP.

Sources include: 1 2

Congress bans TikTok on official devices, calls app a security risk

Image: Congress bans TikTok on official devices, calls app a security risk

(Natural News) The administrators at the U.S. House of Representatives instructed all lawmakers and staff to uninstall TikTok from official devices, calling the app a security risk to the people of the United States.

According to official electronic correspondence, staff must remove and never reinstall the application from any device issued by Congress. “The Office of Cybersecurity has deemed the TikTok mobile application to be a high risk to users due to a number of security risks,” the email from the Committee on House Administration stated as the 117th Congress concluded its business.

The Chinese firm-owned app had also been banned on government devices as part of the $1.7 trillion omnibus spending bill.

Several lawmakers wanted to go even further and ban the app entirely in the United States. Senator Marco Rubio and Congressman Mike Gallagher introduced the bill titled “Anti-social CCP Act,” which indicated that the short-form video hosting platform is communist China’s spy technology on Americans.

A spokesperson for the social media platform said the move is “a politically-motivated ban that will do nothing to advance the national security of the United States.”

However, TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, recently admitted that four of its employees used the app to spy on journalists at the Financial Times and BuzzFeed News.

In an internal company email seen by the New York Times, the company said it asked four employees to find the source of leaked internal communications this past summer. The employees decided to access the IP addresses and other data of several U.S. citizens via their TikTok accounts, but ultimately failed to find what they had been looking for.


“The public trust that we have spent huge efforts building is going to be significantly undermined by the misconduct of a few individuals,” ByteDance CEO Liang Rubo said in an internal email.

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said he was disappointed in the employees and that the company takes data security “incredibly seriously.” TikTok initially denied the allegations, insisting that it did not collect “precise GPS location information from U.S. users,” and only used IP addresses to help show “relevant content and ads.”

Big Tech companies hijack personal data to control people’s lives

Critics and observers are saying that tech giants take control of their users’ lives by hijacking personal data. It was comprehensively discussed in the book titled “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism,” authored by social psychologist and Harvard University professor Shoshana Zuboff. (Related: Shoshana Zuboff: Big Tech companies hijack personal data to control people’s lives.)

In a review of the book, renowned alternative medicine proponent Dr. Joseph Mercola said the information – also called “behavioral surplus data streams” – is gathered without the knowledge of netizens. The technocrats are using them to surveil users’ buying behaviors and preferences that would give them opportunities to generate profits for themselves.

“We have become the product. We are the real revenue stream in this digital economy,” Mercola pointed out.

In a video documentary, Zuboff said: “The term ‘surveillance capitalism’ is not an arbitrary term. Why surveillance? Because it must be operations that are engineered as undetectable, indecipherable, cloaked in rhetoric that aims to misdirect, obfuscate and downright bamboozle all of us, all the time.”

In the video, the author explained how surveillance capitalism came about. According to her, a startup company named Google struggled to survive after the 2000 crisis that burst the internet bubble.

But the search engine got a boost when its founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin accidentally discovered that “residual data” left behind by users during their internet searches could be traded and sold. By compiling this residual data, they could predict the behavior of internet users and guarantee advertisers a more targeted audience.

Visit for more news related to the China-owned app Tiktok.

Watch the video below that talks about TikTok being caught spying on American journalists.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on

More related stories:

Indiana sues Tiktok over consumer data access and sexual content.

New research reveals social media sites like Meta, Instagram and Tiktok can monitor keystrokes to obtain private information.

Former Israeli surveillance agents hold hundreds of positions with big tech giants like Google, Facebook, Microsoft.

Facebook employees accused of “hijacking” user accounts fired after taking bribe money from outside hackers.

Sources include: 1 2

Cardiac Tamponade After COVID-19 Vaccination

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

I am concerned that bias amongst editors and publishers to reject manuscripts describing adverse outcomes with COVID-19 vaccination is resulting in relatively few papers that could be describing a large number of real patients with adverse outcomes. Dr. Hryniewicki et al, in 2021 described a potentially fatal case of pericarditis (fluid around the heart) which was so severe it was crushing the heart and could have caused death at home (pericardial tamponade).

This occurred in an 18-year old man 3 weeks after he took the first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. In his case COVID-19 respiratory illness had a negligible risk of hospitalization or death, so any vaccine complication would be considered unacceptable. His first trip the the Emergency Department revealed an ECG consistent with pericarditis, no myocarditis by troponin testing, and no pericardial effusion by echocardiogram. Ten days later he required hospital admission for a large accumulation of pericardial fluid, pericardial drainage of 600 ml, was again released to home. A week later was readmitted again with persistent symptoms, and was given additional medications including corticosteroids and a plan to give rilonacept, an expensive interleukin-1 inhibitor to reduce the inflammation. The teaching points in his case are: 1) patient had to be persistent and seek care three times for this potentially fatal problem, 2) repeated echocardiography was a key diagnostic test, 3) patient is now set up for chronic pericarditis and a lifelong problem of scarring within the chest all for an unnecessary COVID-19 vaccine.

I wonder how many COVID-19 vaccine deaths among young people had an office or emergency department visit in the days before death. What was the cardiovascular evaluation? In this case it took a concerned patient and assiduous doctors, otherwise he would have died at home. So if you or someone you know has had chest pain, shortness of breath, increased heart rate, and low grade fever after even one dose of the mRNA vaccine, be sure to seek medical care and demand ECG, blood tests, and echocardiography. Be persistent if symptoms fail to resolve.

If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.

Hryniewicki AT, Tolia VM, Nene RV. Cardiac Tamponade After COVID-19 Vaccination. J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;62(2):250-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 23. PMID: 34996671; PMCID: PMC8536519.

A $500K debate: Did the COVID vaccine save lives or not?

I need a few volunteers ASAP who can afford to spend full time for the next 30 days putting together our case into a compelling, compact 45-minute slide presentation that will convince a neutral panel of 6 scientists that we are correct.

If you are familiar with all the data (country data, works of Smalley, Crawford, Fenton, Sterling, Dowd, Pantazatos, Seligmann, Beaudoin, etc) and/or are skilled in putting together persuasive slide presentations for scientists, please use the Contact me form. Be sure to select the “Help Steve win” item:

In the Notes field, let me know of things you’ve done in the past similar to this.

Thanks in advance for your help on this. This is not about me winning a bet. This is about all of us settling a very important issue for the world.