And Now for the Rest of the George Floyd Psyop


As we suspected and asked from Day 1 of the George Floyd incident, where’s the police body-cam footage? Meanwhile, as major racial strife swept the land, the corrupto star chamber Attorney General of Minnesota, Keith Ellison, sat on the evidence, controlled the narrative and failed to provide proper transparency to the public.

Even two months later, the body-cam footage was still being withheld by this skulduggery corrupto. However, attorneys for one of the defendants — officer Thomas Lane, 37, who is charged with aiding and abetting second-degree murder — secured written transcripts of the videos from three of the officers.

George Floyd transcript: Read it in full here

Finally during the trial more body cam was released. You can view it for yourself. There is also a verbal exchange transcript to follow – although it is mostly gibberish and incomprehensible.

Mostly it shows Floyd acting hysterically. He is put into the back seat of the police cruiser. The police are dealing with a non-compliant hard case. After being instructed to calm down and sit, inexplicably in the last portion of the clip the officers take him back out on the street side. To my eyes this action makes zero sense and is suspect.

According to the transcript from his body camera video, officer Lane asked to see Floyd’s hands at least 10 times. The transcript shows Floyd repeatedly asked the officers not to shoot him, saying he had been shot before (not true).

Obviously, Floyd is highly agitated and paranoid from his drug cocktail. It’s also evident that he’s having heart and respiratory difficulties. Even so, he fails to comply with the officer. If you have heart issues, it is recommended that you not “bounce off the walls” as Floyd is seen doing. Instead stay calm and inactive. But Floyd sealed his own fate. This procedure might save your life.

Here’s surveillance video showing officers trying to insert Floyd into the cruiser. It turned up about three weeks after the riots and looting commenced. The officers appear quite patient and deliberate in handling this very large, erratic, and highly drugged individual. The transcript described some version of this when Floyd got out on the other side of the vehicle. That portion is above and only turned up during the star chamber trial.

Floyd says, “I’m sorry, I‘m so sorry. God dang man. Man, l got, I got shot the same way, Mr. Officer, before.”

Lane asks Floyd to step out of the vehicle. As he is doing so, Floyd says to him, “Okay, Mr. Officer, please don‘t shoot me. Please, man.”

Lane: “I’m not going to shoot you. Step out and face away.”

Floyd: “I’ll look at you eye-to-eye man. Please don‘t shoot me, man.”

Lane: “I’m not shooting you, man.”

Floyd: “l just lost my mom, man.”

Lane asks a witness, one Shawanda Renee Hill, why Floyd is acting erratic.

Lane: “Why’s he getting all squirrelly and not showing us his hands, and just being all weird like that?”

Hill: “I have no clue, because he’s been shot before.”

Lane: “Well, get that, but still, when officers say, ‘Get out of the car.’ ls he drunk, is he on something?”

Hill: “No, he got things going on, I‘m telling you about the police.”

Lane: “What does that mean?”

Hill: “He have problems all the time when they come, especially when that man put that gun like that. It’s been one.”

As the officers are trying to get Floyd into their squad car, he repeatedly tells them he is claustrophobic and asks them to crack a window.

“Y‘all I’m going to die in here! I’m going to die, man!…and I just had COVID-19 man, I don’t want to go back to that,” Floyd says.

Lane tells Floyd he will roll the windows down and turn the air conditioning on.

Floyd tells the officers several times that he cannot breathe and says he wants to lay on the ground. Prior to finally getting Floyd to the ground, he says he cannot breathe multiple times.

At some point, Derek Chauvin and Tou Thao arrive on the scene.

The officers bring Floyd to the ground, where he continues to say he cannot breathe. He repeatedly cries out for his mother and says, “Tell my kids I love them. I’m dead.”

“You’re doing a lot of talking man,” Chauvin tells him.

At one point, Lane asks, “Should we roll him on his side?”

Chauvin replies, “No, he’s staying put where we got him.”

Lane: “Okay. Just worry about the excited delirium or whatever.”

Chauvin: “Well that’s why we got the ambulance coming.”

Lane:Okay, I suppose.”

Lane asks again a short time later, “Should we roll him on his side?”

EMS arrives to check on Floyd. Lane asks the paramedics, “You want one of us to ride with?” and he goes into the ambulance to help with CPR.

One of the paramedics asks Lane what was going on. Lane replies that they responded to a forgery report and that Floyd was “just not compliant with getting out of the car.”

“We were trying to get him in the back of the squad, and he was just basically resisting … He wasn’t showing us his hands at first. Then, we were trying to get him into the squad, he kicked his way out, he was kicking on there. And we came out the other side, and he was fighting us, and we were just basically restrained him until you guys got here,” Lane says.

So we have established the 6’5″ Floyd was in some sort of drug induced delirious panic and was fighting with officers. Yet, visual evidence has been withheld from the public.

The county coroner determined that Floyd did not die of asphyxiation and also that there was no damage to neck or trachea. In the report it literally says “no life threatening injuries.” He died of heart failure enhanced by high doses of fentanyl and meth.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison

Who is Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison?

So why is Ellison engaging in Star Chamber justice?

Ellison’s politics are radically Leftist. He is another prime example of a 5th Columnist and of negative selection (kakistocracy) running amok in New America positions of power.

One issue Ellison’s campaign opponents raised was the repeated suspension of his driver’s license for his failure to pay tickets and fines.

Ellison had also failed to pay all or part of his income taxes in five separate years between 1992 and 2000, forcing the state and Internal Revenue Service to put liens on his home. He later paid in excess of $18,000 in fines.

In early 2006, the Minnesota State Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board reprimanded Ellison for events alleged in 2002 and 2004, namely

  • unreported campaign contributions
  • discrepancies in cash balances, and
  • misclassified disbursements during his campaigns for the Minnesota House of Representatives

In 2005, the board opened an investigation, and Ellison was subpoenaed and fined. Ellison was repeatedly fined for late filings, was sued twice by the former A.G. of Minnesota and was warned about absent or incomplete disclosures.

Ellison’s son, Jeremiah Ellison, is a member of Minneapolis City Council.

It was alleged that in 2006 Ellison “pushed, shoved and verbally abused” former girlfriend Amy Alexander. Ellison denied the accusation and alleged that Alexander had harassed him and threatened to “destroy” him. A judge granted Ellison’s request for a restraining order against Alexander and refused a similar request by Alexander against Ellison.

In August 2018, Ellison was accused again by an ex-girlfriend, Karen Monahan, and her son of attempting to drag her off a bed while shouting obscenities.

Ellison’s wife was on the Minneapolis school board.

Ellison’s son, Jeremiah Ellison, is a member of Minneapolis City Council. He has openly declared his support for Antifa.

I hereby declare, officially, my support for ANTIFA

Unless someone can prove to me ANTIFA is behind the burning of black and immigrant owned businesses in my ward, I’ll keep focusing on stopping the white power terrorist THE ARE ACTUALLY ATTACKING US!

— Jeremiah Ellison (@jeremiah4north) May 31, 2020

In other words, if your business is in Jerehiah’s ward and it was destroyed by Antifa anarchists, Jeremiah doesn’t give a damn. You don’t matter in his world unless you are black or fresh off the boat, so to speak. Nice. And as long as his daddy is A.G., there will never be any prosecutorial proof of Antifa’s criminality in Minnesota that will be allowed to see the light of day. Aren’t there any normies left in Minnesota?

Winter Watch Takeaway

Ellison is a bum and should be recused of any involvement in this highly sketchy George Floyd case (hoax?). He has no business serving as Minnesota’s attorney general or as an officer of the court. We also have a criminally compliant press that fails to bird-dog the truth of this incident. The rest is history as the officers involved were subjected to a star chamber.

Officer Chauvin is allegedly in federal prison in Tucson. Has he ever done an interview on his case? None that I can find or am aware of.  Any real journalist care to do so?

Woke Wells Fargo cancels accounts for major Fla. gun dealer as bank indicates it will cut loans to white people

Image: Woke Wells Fargo cancels accounts for major Fla. gun dealer as bank indicates it will cut loans to white people

(Natural News) Wells Fargo bank is making moves to impose corporate management’s left-wing agenda on as much of the country as possible, which will lead to a further bifurcation of left-versus-right in an America that is no longer united on much of anything, thanks to the Communist Democratic Party’s counter-revolutionary push over the past 50 years.

First, the bank has decided to end its relationship with a major gun dealer in Florida, further indicating that it will increasingly discriminate against the firearms industry unless there is a concerted legal effort to punish Wells Fargo for doing so.

According to The Reload:

With little explanation, the bank closed the business and personal accounts of Brandon Wexler just before Christmas. After 25 years with a personal account and 14 years with a business account, Wexler was given about a month to find a new bank. As owner of Wex Gunworks in Delray Beach, Florida, Wexler has been cited in countless major media reports for years, but Wells Fargo said his business had suddenly become too risky.

“Wells Fargo performs ongoing reviews of its account relationships in connection with the Bank’s responsibilities to manage risks in its banking operations,” the bank said in a December 22nd letter to Wexler. “We recently reviewed your account relationship and, as a result of this review, we will be closing your above-referenced accounts.”

A second letter the bank sent the following day informed the store owner that the company was also canceling his business line of credit, noting “the reason(s) for this action is: Banking guidelines excludes lending to certain types of businesses.” Of course, the letter did not offer any further details and Wexler said no one at his local bank branch offered one, either.


“I’ve been with them for 25 years,” he told The Reload. “I’m a professional fireman. I do everything the right way. It’s messed up.”

He went on to say that he had not changed anything with his business and that he believes the bank’s decision was based solely on the left-wing corporate board room’s hatred of America’s fundamental right to keep and bear arms.

“It feels like it’s a direct attack against gun dealers,” he said. “This all just happened recently, and we have been in business for many years. I’ve never ever seen anything like this.”

A spokesperson for the bank denied that, of course.

“Based on our analysis of the risk associated with this customer, we made a decision to close the accounts,” she told The Reload. “Our decision is not based on the industry.”


The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), which represents gun makers and dealers, said what happened with Wexler is part of a larger trend within the financial sector.

“Wells Fargo’s decision to abruptly cancel all business ties with Wex Gunworks is the most recent example of ‘woke’ banking discrimination against the firearm industry,” Mark Oliva, an NSSF spokesman, told The Reload.

Meanwhile, as Infowars reported, Wells Fargo is also discriminating against white people, which is not just unconstitutional but a direct violation of federal civil rights laws:

Wells Fargo, the top mortgage lending institution in the U.S., announced its cutting home loan services to instead focus on select customers, namely “individuals and families in minority communities.”

The financial services company claimed the decision is based on market changes and a slowing economy, but that apparently isn’t stopping the company from woke virtue-signaling.

“We are making the decision to continue to reduce risk in the mortgage business by reducing its size and narrowing its focus,” Kleber Santos, CEO of Consumer Lending said in a press release, as reported by the New York Post.

“We will continue to expand our programs to reach more customers in underserved communities by leveraging our strong partnerships with the National Urban League, Unidos US and other non-profit organizations,” said Kristy Fercho, Well Fargo’s head of Home Lending and head of Diverse Segments, Representation and Inclusion.

Mind you, banks don’t need departments of ‘inclusion’ because of our Constitution and federal laws against discrimination. So the only reason to form one is to discriminate officially under the guise of trying to be ‘more inclusive.’

As more legacy institutions like banks continue to shun more than half the country, it will become even more necessary for there to be new ones — like ‘patriot banks’ — to replace them.

Sources include:

Tesla announces $775 million investment in Texas Gigafactory, slashes prices on EVs

Image: Tesla announces $775 million investment in Texas Gigafactory, slashes prices on EVs

(Natural News) Just days after Tesla announced significant price cuts on its electric vehicles, the company announced a big investment in its Gigafactory in Austin, Texas. The automaker has unveiled a $775.7 million plan that will see four new buildings being constructed at the site, where it currently produces electric vehicles and their batteries. The new facilities will include one for cathode and drive unit manufacturing, a die shop, and battery cell testing and manufacturing.

According to filings made by the company with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, the construction will amount to 1.4 million square feet overall. The biggest building will be a 693,000-square-foot facility known as Cell 1, which is being built at an expected cost of $368 million. Construction is set to get underway next week and should be finished by the end of next year. The facility for drive units will measure 423,000 square feet, while the cathode manufacturing facility will be 321,000 square feet and the cell testing lab will be 2560 square feet.

The Gigafactory was opened last April in Austin and is currently responsible for producing the company’s Model Y electric vehicle. Tesla has also announced that it will start making Model 3 vehicles as well as its Cybertruck at the facility. In the future, they will also reportedly build their humanoid robot, the Tesla Bot, at the site.

The news comes not long after it was reported that the company had promoted its China production chief, Tom Zhu, to be in charge of their American assembly plants. In addition to the Texas plant, Tesla also has manufacturing facilities in California, Germany, China and Nevada and is reportedly planning to open up a new factory in Mexico.


Investment comes after price cuts that angered some customers

The news of this huge investment comes at a time when Tesla has cut its prices by up to 20 percent throughout the U.S. and Europe in hopes of boosting demand for electric vehicles as the company deals with an economic slowdown as well as strong competition from more established competitors.

These cuts have brought prices to their lowest level in two years. The company says that dropping supply chain costs and reduced costs arising from shifting components closer to their factories are behind the move. Just a few days ago, the brand implemented price reductions in China, prompting complaints from customers who had already pre-ordered their cars at higher prices or saw their vehicles lose a considerable amount of value essentially overnight. Some angry customers even protested the price cuts outside of Chinese showrooms.

Tesla appears to have learned from the reaction in China, as the company has said that it will pass the price cuts along to customers in Europe who have already placed orders for vehicles.

The price savings for American customers amount to as much as $13,000 across their model range.

Meanwhile, shares of Tesla have dropped more than two thirds in the last year in response to concerns over slowing demand at a time when rivals such as Hyundai and Volkswagen have been enjoying impressive jumps in electric vehicle sales.

Wedbush Analyst Dan Ives said the cuts were “the right medicine at the right time.”

He added: “It’s no secret that demand for Tesla is starting to see some cracks in this global slowdown for 2023.”

He believes the cuts are an offensive move on Tesla’s part that could ultimately lead to greater demand.

Sources for this article include:

COERCION: Pfizer targeted Nigerian AG in 2009, pressured him to cease legal action

Image: COERCION: Pfizer targeted Nigerian AG in 2009, pressured him to cease legal action

(Natural News) Pfizer targeted Nigeria’s federal attorney general (AG) in 2009, pressuring him to cease legal action and drop any complaints in relation to the company’s disastrous trials of its meningitis drug Trovan.

Back in 1996, amid an outbreak of meningitis in the northern Nigerian state of Kano, Pfizer conducted an unauthorized trial of Trovan involving 200 children. Eleven children died, while many more suffered serious injuries. It was later discovered that the trial was done without the consent of the children’s parents.

The Nigerian federal government then filed a criminal and civil lawsuit against Pfizer, demanding $7 billion in damages. Separately, the state government of Kano filed a $2 billion lawsuit. Both lawsuits were dropped and eventually settled out of court, with the state government of Kano agreeing to a $75 million settlement with the drug manufacturer. (Related: NEVER FORGET: Pfizer sued for $7B over illegal drug trials on kids.)

But an April 2009 cable published by WikiLeaks revealed that Enrico Liggeri, Pfizer’s country manager for Nigeria, admitted that the company did not want to pay to settle the two lawsuits filed by Abuja. For the Kano lawsuits, however, the company came to the conclusion that “the $75 million figure was reasonable because the suits had been ongoing for many years [and had been] costing Pfizer more than $15 million a year in legal and investigative fees.”

The same cable stated that “according to Liggeri, Pfizer had hired investigators to uncover corruption links to then-Federal AG Michael Aondoakaa to expose him and put pressure on him to drop the federal cases.” The top Pfizer official continued that investigators hired by the company “were passing this information to local media.”


“A series of damaging articles detailing Aondokaa’s ‘alleged’ corruption ties were published in February and March,” the WikiLeaks cable indicated. “Liggeri contended that Pfizer had much more damaging information on Aondoakaa and that [the federal AG’s] cronies were pressuring him to drop the suit for fear of further negative articles.”

Aondoakaa accused of dropping federal lawsuits against Pfizer

The two lawsuits being dropped raised suspicions in the West African nation, given that Aondoakaa served as the legal counsel for the federal government. In November 2010, Nigerian newspaper Next ran a story about the federal AG’s supposed “secret deal with Pfizer.”

The piece stated that the terms of the “agreement” that caused Abuja to drop its two lawsuits “remain unknown because of the nature of [the] deal brokered by Aondoakaa.” It continued: “The withdrawal of the case, as well as the terms of settlement, is a highly guarded secret by the parties involved in the negotiation.

Meanwhile, the WikiLeaks cable referenced an April 2 meeting between Leggeri, Pfizer lawyers Joe Petrosinelli and Atiba Adams and officials at the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria. During the meeting, the two attorneys mentioned the role of Gen. Yakubu Gowon – the former Nigerian head of state from 1966 to 1975 – in interceding on Pfizer’s behalf.

“Petroselli noted that Pfizer has worked closely with Gowon, and that he has played a positive mediation role with Kano state and the federal government. Gowon spoke with Kano Gov. Mallam Ibrahim Shekarau, who directed the Kano AG to reduce the settlement demand from $150 million to $75 million. Adams reported that Gowon met with President [Umaru Musa] Yar’Adua and convinced him to drop the two federal high court cases against Pfizer,” the WikiLeaks cable stated.

Aondoakaa, formerly the country’s justice minister from 2007 until 2010, expressed astonishment at the WikiLeaks cable claims. “I’m very surprised to see I became a subject, which is very shocking to me,” he told the Guardian. “I was not aware of Pfizer looking into my past. For them to have done that is a very serious thing.

Pfizer denied the accusations in a statement, claiming that “any notion that the company hired investigators in connection to the former AG is simply preposterous.” It added that it “negotiated the settlement with the federal government of Nigeria in good faith, and its conduct in reaching that agreement was proper.”

Visit for more about Pfizer’s corruption.

Watch this video that explains how Pfizer targeted former Nigerian Federal AG Michael Aondoakaa.

This video is from the channel on

More related stories:

Pfizer to Pay Tens of Millions for Deaths of Nigerian Children in Drug Trial Experiment.

Pfizer has a shockingly long history of engaging in illegal activities and human experimentation.

THREAD #PfizerFiles – the true history of Pfizer’s repeated criminal behavior and destruction of human lives.

NEVER FORGET: In 1994, Pfizer paid $20 million after LYING about defective heart valve that killed hundreds.

Pfizer, which ran vaccine experiments on Nigerian children, gets “fast track” approval for its coronavirus vaccines by the FDA.

Sources include:

Every Facet of Government Is in the Censorship Business

  • Between the documentation obtained through a recent lawsuit against the White House and the Twitter files released by Elon Musk, it’s become quite clear that every facet of the U.S. government, including its intelligence agencies, are involved in illegal and unconstitutional censorship

  • We now have proof that the FBI has been acting as the key instigator and implementer of the government’s illegal censorship of Americans. The FBI has also actively interfered in multiple elections — all while inventing the narrative that foreign nations were interfering

  • Twitter has worked hand in hand with the U.S. Department of Defense to aid U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots

  • The Twitter files also reveal members of Congress have a direct line to Twitter and have had accounts suspended on their behalf and content removed at their whim

  • Discovery documents from a lawsuit against the White House filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana show at least 67 federal employees across more than a dozen agencies are also engaged in illegal censorship activities. This includes aides to President Biden, who pressured social media companies to change their policies to fit White House demands for censorship

Visit Mercola Market


Between the documentation obtained through a recent lawsuit against the White House and the Twitter files released by Elon Musk, it’s become quite clear that every facet of the U.S. government, including its intelligence agencies, are involved in illegal and unconstitutional censorship.

In the video above, Fox News host Tucker Carlson interviews independent journalist Matt Taibbi, who has spent weeks sifting through the released Twitter files and reported on the contents.

Importantly, we now have proof that the FBI has been acting as the key instigator and implementer of the government’s illegal censorship of Americans’ political and medical views. The agency has also, on a regular basis and for unknown purposes, asked Twitter to reveal the location of specific Twitter users, such as actor Billy Baldwin.

What’s more, internal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memos, emails and documents show the DHS has worked on expanding its influence over tech platforms for years, so, government censorship is not something that came about in response to the COVID crisis. Nor is the censorship limited to COVID or public health information in general.

Evidence shows the FBI has actively interfered in multiple elections — all while inventing the narrative that foreign nations were doing the interfering.

As noted by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., these kinds of activities are “the biggest threat to our constitutional democracy today.”

As just one example, we now know the FBI plotted to quench the Hunter Biden laptop story well before the first report about it was published. In collaboration with Twitter, Facebook and the Aspen Institute, the FBI held a tabletop exercise to practice the shaping of the media’s coverage of a potential “hack and dump” operation involving Hunter Biden material.

As reported by the New York Post:

“[The] drill was put into practical use weeks later, when The Post broke the news about Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop — which was either ignored or downplayed by most mainstream news outlets and suppressed by both Twitter and Facebook.”

There’s also evidence showing the FBI has been shielding Hunter Biden and working with social media to censor bad press about him as far back as 2018.

That job was probably made easier by the fact that reportedly former FBI agents work at both Twitter and Facebook.

For example, Jim Baker spent three decades with the FBI before becoming Twitter’s head lawyer,

and Facebook employs no less than 115 “former” employees of the FBI, CIA, NSA and other intelligence agencies, most of whom now work in Facebook’s content moderation department.

Disturbingly, we now also have evidence showing that while Twitter insisted it was cracking down on covert government propaganda accounts, they only tracked down and banned foreign government-affiliated propaganda while working hand in hand with the U.S. Department of Defense to aid U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots.

As reported by The Intercept:

“Behind the scenes, Twitter gave approval and special protection to the U.S. military’s online psychological ops. Despite knowledge that Pentagon propaganda accounts used overt identities, Twitter did not suspend many for around two years or more. Some remain active …

In 2017 a U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) official sent Twitter a list of 52 Arab language accounts ‘we use to amplify certain messages.’ The official asked for priority service for six accounts, verification for one and ‘whitelist’ abilities for the others.”

Whitelisted accounts have a “validated” status similar to that of the blue check mark, which ensures they are promoted in searches. These accounts also don’t get shadow-banned or limited by other means. Adding insult to injury, the FBI has been using taxpayer dollars to pay Twitter for their censorship and propaganda services — more than $3.4 million between October 2019 and February 2021 alone.

The FBI has not acted alone, however. Far from it. The Twitter files reveal members of Congress have a direct line to Twitter and have had accounts suspended on their behalf and content removed at their whim. As reported by MSN:

“… Taibbi … reported that Twitter ‘received an astonishing variety of requests from officials asking for individuals they didn’t like to be banned.’ An example he shared was one sent in November 2020 by [Rep. Adam] Schiff’s office, who contacted Twitter hoping the tech giant would take action regarding ‘alleged harassment from QAnon conspiracists’ against Schiff’s staff, including aide Sean Misko.

‘Remove any and all content about Mr. Misko and other Committee staff from its service — to include quotes, retweets, and reactions to that content,’ the request to Twitter read. ‘Suspend the many accounts, including @GregRubini and @paulsperry, which have repeatedly promoted false QAnon conspiracies.'”

Other government leaders have been less clandestine in their censoring operations. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, for example, wrote an open letter to Amazon demanding they ban my book, “The Truth About COVID-19.”

Similarly, two state attorneys general, Letitia James and William Tong, publicly threatened social media companies with legal ramifications if they refused to censor the “Misinformation Dozen.” President Joe Biden also publicly called on social media platforms to ban my accounts. But it gets worse.

Discovery documents from a lawsuit against the White House

filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana (Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry) show at least 67

federal employees across more than a dozen agencies are engaged in these kinds of illegal censorship activities. This includes officials from:

  • The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Election Security and Resilience team

  • Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis

  • The FBI’s foreign influence taskforce

  • The Justice Department’s (DOJ) national security division

  • The Office of the Director of National Intelligence

  • White House staff (including White House lawyer Dana Remus, deputy assistant to the president Rob Flaherty and former White House senior COVID-19 adviser Andy Slavitt)

  • Health and Human Services (HHS)

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

  • National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

  • The Office of the Surgeon General

  • The Census Bureau

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • The State Department

  • The U.S. Treasury Department

  • The U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Consultants from the strategic communications and marketing firm Reingold

were also hired to manage the government’s collusion with social media in this intentional effort to violate our Constitutional right to free speech.

In a January 8, 2023, op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Jenin Younes and Aaron Kheriaty reviewed a series of emails between White House digital media director Rob Flaherty and a Facebook executive, illustrating how the White House pressured the company to censor and remove vaccine content even though Facebook itself characterized the material as “often-true content:”

“Newly released documents show that the White House has played a major role in censoring Americans on social media. Email exchanges between Rob Flaherty … and social-media executives prove the companies put COVID censorship policies in place in response to relentless, coercive pressure from the White House — not voluntarily.”

Flaherty also demanded Facebook limit the spread of viral content on WhatsApp, a private messaging app with broad reach among “immigrant communities and communities of color.” In the end, Facebook acquiesced to all of Flaherty’s demands to prevent the spread of vaccine hesitancy and control political speech. As noted by Younes and Kheriaty:

“President Biden, press secretary Jen Psaki and Surgeon General Vivek Murthy … publicly vowed to hold the platforms accountable if they didn’t heighten censorship. On July 16, 2021, a reporter asked Mr. Biden [about] his ‘message to platforms like Facebook.’

He replied, ‘They’re killing people.’ Mr. Biden later claimed he meant users, not platforms, were killing people. But the record shows Facebook itself was the target of the White House’s pressure campaign.”

Flaherty also had Google in his crosshairs, and accused YouTube of “‘funneling’ people into vaccine hesitancy,” adding that this concern was “shared at the highest (and I mean the highest) levels of the White House.”

“These emails establish a clear pattern,” Younes and Kheriaty write. “Mr. Flaherty, representing the White House, expresses anger at the companies’ failure to censor COVID-related content to his satisfaction. The companies change their policies to address his demands. As a result, thousands of Americans were silenced for questioning government approved COVID narratives.

Two of the Missouri plaintiffs, Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, are epidemiologists whom multiple social-media platforms censored at the government’s behest for expressing views that were scientifically well-founded but diverged from the government line — for instance, that children and adults with natural immunity from prior infection don’t need COVID vaccines …

The First Amendment bars government from engaging in viewpoint-based censorship. The state-action doctrine bars government from circumventing constitutional strictures by suborning private companies to accomplish forbidden ends indirectly.

Defenders of the government have fallen back on the claim that cooperation by the tech companies was voluntary, from which they conclude that the First Amendment isn’t implicated. The reasoning is dubious, but even if it were valid, the premise has now been proved false.

The Flaherty emails demonstrate that the federal government unlawfully coerced the companies in an effort to ensure that Americans would be exposed only to state-approved information about COVID-19. As a result of that unconstitutional state action, Americans were given the false impression of a scientific ‘consensus’ on critically important issues around COVID-19.”

Taken together, the revelations from the Twitter files and this lawsuit clearly demonstrate that most, if not all, aspects of the U.S. government have been secretly weaponized to undermine and circumvent the Constitutional rights of the people.

“It’s much more serious than what I thought at the beginning.” ~ Matt Taibbi

As noted by Taibbi in his Fox News interview:

“This is not a partisan story. It’s a story about the architecture of the intelligence community and law enforcement getting its hands on speech, and on the ability of people to communicate with one another through platforms like Twitter and Facebook. And they’re doing this in a very profound way — it’s much more serious than what I thought at the beginning …”

While the danger we’re in as a nation is far more dire than anyone suspected, there is some good news. A new select committee, chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan, has been launched to investigate the weaponization of government, the politicization of the FBI and the DOJ’s investigation into and harassment of parents who spoke out against COVID mandates, critical race theory and the sexualization of their children at school board meetings. As reported by The Post Millennial:

“This investigative panel will demand emails and correspondence between the Biden administration and big tech companies, and follows the massive revelations that came to light through the recent release of the Twitter files. Newly minted House Speaker Kevin McCarthy … was asked to form the committee as part of the negotiations that brought him to power …

The probe into communications between tech giants and President Biden’s aides will look for government pressure that could have resulted in censorship or harassment of conservatives — or squelching of debate on polarizing policies, including the CDC on COVID …”

While it’s likely that government personnel and agencies will try to ignore the committee’s requests for information, the committee does have subpoena power, and hopefully will not be too timid to use it.

Unfortunately, since the GOP does not control the Senate, it’s unlikely they’ll be able to pass any new laws based on the committee’s findings. That said, legislation to penalize government censorship has already been introduced, and you can help push it forward by asking your representatives to support it.

The Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act

(HR.8752), introduced by three Republican House Representatives on the House Oversight and Reform, Judiciary, and Commerce committees, including Jordan, is specifically aimed at preventing federal employees from using their positions to influence censorship decisions by tech platforms.

The bill would create restrictions to prevent federal employees from asking or encouraging private entities to censor private speech or otherwise discourage free speech, and impose penalties, including civil fines and disciplinary actions for government employees who facilitate social media censorship.

While the U.S. Constitution clearly forbids government censoring and restricting free speech, HR. 8752 could be a helpful enforcement tool — and we clearly need enforcement, seeing how more than a dozen agencies are flouting the Constitution and have done so for years. People might tend to think twice, though, when they know there’s a personal price to pay.

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.