World Economic Forum Plots Misinformation Plan

  • At the World Economic Forum (WEF) 2023 annual meeting, countering misinformation is a key agenda

  • WEF claims a “wide range of actors with access to sophisticated technology and weaponry, as well as an ever-increasing capacity to spread misinformation” are a threat

  • WEF hasn’t defined the misinformation it’s targeting, but it likely includes criticism of the WEF and challenges to mainstream COVID-19 narratives

  • In 2022, WEF held Sustainable Development Impact Meetings that also featured panels on “tackling disinformation”

  • Among the participants were the United Nations, which noted it had partnered with Big Tech giants like Google and TikTok to censor the narrative on environmental issues and COVID-19

Visit Mercola Market

Advertisement

The World Economic Forum (WEF) rings in the New Year with its annual meeting, held in Davos, Switzerland, each January. The meeting “will convene leaders from government, business and civil society to address the state of the world and discuss priorities for the year ahead,” according to WEF.

In 2023, the theme is “cooperation in a fragmented world,” with WEF noting, “The world today is at a critical inflection point. The sheer number of ongoing crises calls for bold collective action.”

What will this bold collective action entail? A key theme being discussed at one of its sessions is countering “misinformation,”

also known as silencing and censoring any and all opposition.

WEF is an unelected global organization with self-appointed leaders. How it intends to define the misinformation it’s targeting as one of its key 2023 initiatives is unknown, but it’s dubbed the “cumulative ‘threats’ black swan events.” In a description for its Countering Threats in the Age of Black Swans session, it’s noted:

“As black swan events proliferate, threats that were once considered outliers are becoming commonplace. This is compounded by a wide range of actors with access to sophisticated technology and weaponry, as well as an ever-increasing capacity to spread misinformation. How can we begin to predict the unpredictable in mitigating and countering security threats from black swan events?”

In December 2022, WEF already started damage control for its Davos meeting, stating in a separate post that it has “weathered criticism as a gathering of elites and in recent years the Forum has been targeted by disinformation campaigns.”

As Reclaim the Net noted, this suggests the “group deems criticism of the WEF and challenging mainstream Covid-19 narratives to be misinformation.”

It’s well-known fact that the world’s elite hop into their private jets and descend upon Davos, Switzerland, the highest town in the country,

known for its luxury ski resorts, in order to attend WEF’s annual meeting, also known simply as the Davos Forum or just Davos.

To even attend the WEF annual meeting, you must be privately invited or a member of WEF, which costs $65,000 to $650,000.

The attendance badge for the meeting is extra and cost another $27,000 — in 2020 — just to get entrance to the conference.

So who’s in attendance? As comedian JP Sears put it in 2022:

“You’ll be excited to hear that the lineup of World Economic Forum’s speakers at their annual gathering of elites in Davos included such benevolent humanitarians like Xi Jinping, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party, who’s currently committing genocide, and Tony Fauci, who’s arguably involved in crimes against humanity, and Bill Gates, who’s arguably involved in crimes against humanity, and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who’s arguably currently involved in crimes against humanity. What a great line up!”

The irony of the world’s elite flying in on their private jets to discuss sustainability is an open target for criticism. In 2018, for instance, more than 1,000 private jets and helicopters similarly made their way to Davos, and in 2017, an estimated 200 private flights landed in the city each day during the event.

By 2050, it’s estimated that aviation will contribute 22% of global carbon emissions. Still, in 2019, more than 600 private planes arrived at the Davos Forum, and that doesn’t include the military planes that transported an additional 60 presidents and prime ministers.

In 2020, a “steady stream” of private planes again chauffeured the elite to Davos.

But we needn’t worry about this indulgence of the upper classes at the expense of the environment, according to WEF. “Offering little self-awareness, leaders of the WEF claim that the jet-set class promises to purchase carbon credits to offset the emissions from their planes,” Forbes noted.

This is yet another strategy of the technocratic elite to set up a new wave of colonization in the name of sustainability and “net zero” carbon emissions — but, if WEF has anything to say about it, they’ll label this as misinformation and wipe it clean off the net.

Klaus Schwab, owner and chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is the personification of the Great Reset — the ultimate goal of which is to do away with the democratic process and give all ownership and control to the deep state — and the technocratic elite who control it. Sears dubbed him among the most dangerous people in the world.

WEF operates via fearmongering — about disease and environmental catastrophes, for starters. When the population is controlled by fear, it welcomes authoritarian “protections” like increased censorship, surveillance and digital identity systems, introduced under the guise of safety, but which ultimately remove personal autonomy and freedom.

In fact, Schwab wrote, “One of the greatest lessons of the past five centuries in Europe and America is this: Acute crisis contributes to boosting the power of the state. It’s always been the case, and there is no reason why it should be different with the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Remember, nobody elected Schwab to any government position, but he’s behind the scenes pulling strings nonetheless.

WEF is one of the key players behind the Great Reset, with their “new normal” dictum that, by 2030, you will own nothing and be happy.

In such a scheme, the world’s resources will be owned and controlled by the technocratic elite. All items and resources are to be used by the collective, while actual ownership is restricted to an upper stratum of social class.

This isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s part of WEF’s 2030 agenda.

Ida Auken is a member of parliament in Denmark. She’s also a graduate of WEF’s “Young Global Leaders” program,

which is essentially a five-year indoctrination into their principles, with a goal of creating world leaders who don’t answer to their people but to their bosses at WEF.

In 2016, Auken wrote a propaganda piece about how great life would be in 2030, when the elite take over everyone’s possessions and autonomy:

“Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city – or should I say, “our city.” I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes. It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city.

Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.

… My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city.”

People were understandably alarmed when reading about WEF’s Orwellian plans, and now WEF is seeking to censor what it’s dubbed as misinformation surrounding its chilling “own nothing and be happy” rhetoric. As noted by Reclaim the Net:

“WEF complains that it has been targeted by ‘disinformation campaigns’ and links to another post

where its managing director, Adrian Monck, suggests that criticism of the WEF’s controversial ‘You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy’ slogan is tied to a ‘misinformation campaign.’

In addition to branding criticism of this slogan misinformation, Monck also laments ‘misinformation concerning COVID-19 and vaccines.’ Not only does Monck brand these topics misinformation but he also claims that ‘misinformation derails free speech’ and calls for ‘action to prevent lies being accepted as truth.’”

In 2022, WEF held Sustainable Development Impact Meetings that also featured panels on “tackling disinformation.” Among the participants were the United Nation’s Under-Secretary-General for global communications, Melissa Fleming, who noted that the UN had partnered with Big Tech giants like Google and TikTok to censor the narrative on environmental issues and COVID-19.

According to Fleming, the UN conducted a project called “Team Halo:”

“[W]e trained scientists around the world and some doctors on TikTok, and we had TikTok working with us. Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers … influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nations telling them something from New York City headquarters.”

WEF’s “Freedom of the Press Panel,” held in May 2022, also stressed the need for social media companies to be held accountable for algorithms that promote false information.

In August 2022, it also called for the use of AI to censor misinformation and ensure whatever it deems fits this definition never reaches the public. According to WEF:

“By uniquely combining the power of innovative technology, off-platform intelligence collection and the prowess of subject-matter experts who understand how threat actors operate, scaled detection of online abuse can reach near-perfect precision.

… By bringing human-curated, multi-language, off-platform intelligence into learning sets, AI will then be able to detect nuanced, novel abuses at scale, before they reach mainstream platforms.

Supplementing this smarter automated detection with human expertise to review edge cases and identify false positives and negatives and then feeding those findings back into training sets will allow us to create AI with human intelligence baked in … trust and safety teams can stop threats rising online before they reach users.”

The first step to breaking free from the “misinformation” dictatorship is recognizing that the manipulation is occurring. The next involves consciously opting out of it as much as possible. It’s especially important that children are protected, as they are among the most vulnerable to the onslaught of manipulation, which will have serious consequences to future generations.

It’s urgent that we all take steps to remain free, sovereign individuals, which can be as straightforward as being guided by your own critical thinking and what your heart and soul know is right, and choosing bravery over obedience.

Stay grounded in your local community and, when weeding through information in your own life, it’s important to dig deep enough to unveil what’s real, and what’s real misinformation.

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

Deconstructing Bill Gates’ Agenda

  • Gates has used his staggering wealth to buy control, and he’s done it under the cloak of “charity.” A significant piece of that control is the control over population growth. Gates’ family also has a long history of supporting eugenics

  • According to Gates, the global population could be lowered by 10% to 15% if we “do a really great job on new vaccines, health care [and] reproductive health services.” His theory is that as health improves, families opt to have fewer children

  • In 2017, Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance — founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with the WHO, the World Bank and vaccine manufacturers — decided to provide every child with a digital biometric identity to ensure 100% vaccine coverage

  • Gates has also invested in the development and implementation of biometric identification programs tied in with digital currencies

  • Ultimately, the plan is to connect everything together — our identity, finances, medical data, vaccine records and more — at which point we will be 100% enslaved

Visit Mercola Market

Advertisement
ℹ️ From Dr. Joseph Mercola

Since COVID-19 first entered the scene, exchange of ideas has basically been outlawed. By sharing my views and those from various experts throughout the pandemic on COVID treatments and the experimental COVID jabs, I became a main target of the White House, the political establishment and the global cabal.

Propaganda and pervasive censorship have been deployed to seize control over every part of your life, including your health, finances and food supply. The major media is a key player and has been instrumental in creating and fueling fear.

I am republishing this article in its original form so that you can see how the progression unfolded.

In “How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health,” I featured Parts 1 and 2 of investigative journalist James Corbett’s report on this unelected global health czar.

Part 1 reviewed how Gates ended up in a position to monopolize global health, despite his lack of health or medical education. In Part 2, he laid out Gates’ plan to vaccinate the global population against COVID-19 (although there’s no reason to imagine the plan would remain limited to a single vaccine).

Here, in Parts 3 and 4, which you’ll find in the playlist above, Corbett dives into the motives, ideology and connections of Gates that appear to have shaped and are driving his post-COVID-19 plans for the world — plans that include an unprecedented campaign to control the global population in its totality, from cradle to grave.

As noted by Corbett, Gates has used his staggering wealth to buy control, and he’s done it under the cloak of “charity.” A significant piece of that control is the control over population growth.

Indeed, a meeting

in May 2009 between Sir Paul Nurse, then-president of Rockefeller University, Warren Buffet, David Rockefeller Jr., George Soros, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey, revolved around how these billionaires could use their wealth to curb population growth — without the input or interference of government agencies.

According to an article

in The Sunday Times, they met at the request of Gates to discuss “joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.” The article continues:

“Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, said the summit was unprecedented. ‘We only learnt about it afterwards, by accident. Normally these people are happy to talk good causes, but this is different — maybe because they don’t want to be seen as a global cabal,’ he said … Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority …

Another guest said there was ‘nothing as crude as a vote’ but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat … ‘They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.’”

According to Gates, the global population could be lowered by 10% to 15% if we “do a really great job on new vaccines, health care [and] reproductive health services.” His theory is that “as health improves, families choose to have less children … As you improve health, within a half generation the population growth rate goes down.”

Alas, as Corbett notes,

“the idea of using vaccines as sterilization agents — even without the public’s knowledge or consent — is not conspiracy lore, but documentable fact.”

He points out an excerpt from the Rockefeller Foundation’s 1968 annual report

and five-year review, which under the heading “Problems of Population,” states that “very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”

To address the problem, the Rockefeller Foundation vowed to solicit and fund “established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control.”

In 1972, the Rockefeller-funded Population Council joined forces with the World Health Organization, creating the Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation, and in 1995, the task force reported they had developed a prototype of an anti-hCG vaccine that would prevent women from carrying a baby to term.

In the early 1990s, “a series of scandals over WHO-led vaccination programs in the Third World led to allegations that tetanus vaccines in places like the Philippines

and Kenya

were being laced with hCG in order to implement population control by stealth,” Corbett says. The subsequent controversy chilled campaigns promoting population control via vaccines.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation revived the concept during its 2012 Summit on Family Planning in London, when it was announced the foundation will fund research, development and deployment of “injectable contraceptives,” aimed at the developing world.

“But the Gates were not content to stop there,” Corbett says. “In 2014 it was announced that Microchips Biotech, Inc., a company in Lexington, Massachusetts, had developed a new form of birth control: ‘a wireless implant that can be turned on and off with a remote control and that is designed to last up to 16 years.’

According to MIT Technology Review, the idea originated when Bill Gates visited Robert Langer’s MIT lab in 2012 and asked him if it would be possible to create an implantable birth control device that could be turned on or off remotely.

Langer referred Gates to the controlled release microchip technology he had invented and licensed to MicroCHIPS Biotechnology, and the Gates Foundation granted $20 million to the firm to develop the implants.

Reducing population growth has, by Gates’ own admission, been a core mission of the Gates Foundation since its inception. But in order to really understand what Gates means by ‘population control,’ we have to look beyond the concept of controlling population size. At its most fundamental level, the ‘population control’ that Gates speaks of is not birth control, but control of the population itself.”

Part 3 continues by reviewing the work of Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, which was founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with the WHO, the World Bank and various vaccine manufacturers.

In 2017, Gavi decided to provide every child with a digital biometric identity, which would simultaneously store the child’s vaccination records. Without such a system, a 100% immunization rate simply cannot be reached, Gavi CEO Seth Berkley stated.

Shortly thereafter, Gavi became a founding member of the ID2020 Alliance, alongside Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation. In 2019, Gates again collaborated with Langer to develop a novel vaccine delivery method using fluorescent microdot tags — essentially creating an invisible “tattoo” — that can then be read with a modified smartphone.

“It should be no surprise, then, that Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers — in their scramble to produce the coronavirus vaccine that, Gates assures us, is necessary to ‘go back to normal’ — have turned to a novel vaccine delivery method: a dissolvable microneedle array patch,” Corbett says.

“As in so many other aspects of the unfolding crisis, Gates’ unscientific pronouncement that we will need digital certificates to prove our immunity in the ‘new normal’ of the post-coronavirus world is now being implemented by a number of governments.”

Corbett also reviews the rapid development and implementation of biometric identification programs tied in with digital currencies. Undoubtedly, the plan is to connect everything together — your identification, personal finances, medical and vaccination records. Most likely, it will also be embedded on your body, for your own “convenience,” so you cannot lose it. Never mind the fact that everything that can be hacked at some point has been or will be.

“The ID control grid is an essential part of the digitization of the economy,” Corbett says. “And although this is being sold as an opportunity for ‘financial inclusion’ of the world’s poorest in the banking system provided by the likes of Gates and his banking and business associates, it is in fact a system for financial exclusion.

Exclusion of any person or transaction that does not have the approval of the government or the payment providers …

The different parts of this population control grid fit together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. The vaccination drive ties into the biometric identity drive which ties into the cashless society drive.

In Gates’ vision, everyone will receive the government-mandated vaccinations, and everyone will have their biometric details recorded in nationally administered, globally integrated digital IDs.

These digital identities will be tied to all of our actions and transactions, and, if and when they are deemed illegal, they will simply be shut off by the government — or even the payment providers themselves.”

Indeed, if you think online censorship is bad, consider a world in which your online activity is tied to your biometric chip with all your finances and personal data. What easier way to silence people than to block access to their own money? I’m sure there are many other ways in which such a system could be used to control any and all individuals.

“Only the most willfully obtuse could claim to be unable to see the nightmarish implications for this type of all-seeing, all-pervasive society, where every transaction and every movement of every citizen is monitored, analyzed, and databased in real-time by the government.

And Bill Gates is one of those willfully obtuse people,” Corbett says. “This Gates-driven agenda is not about money. It is about control. Control over every aspect of our daily lives, from where we go, to who we meet, to what we buy and what we do.”

What drives a man who is rich beyond imagination to spend his life devising schemes to control the human population? Corbett asks. Surely, something other than money must be driving Gates’ insatiable lust for control. To answer that question, Corbett surveys Gates’ family history.

Both his great-grandfather, J.W. Maxwell, and his grandfather, Willard Maxwell, were bankers. Gates’ grandmother, Adele, was a prominent civic leader. His mother, Mary Maxwell Gates, served as director of several companies, including First Interstate Bancorp and KIRO-TV of Seattle. She was also a regent at the University of Washington, and served on the board of the United Way of America.

Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr., was a prominent lawyer who co-founded a powerful law and lobbying firm. He also served on several corporate and organizational boards, and headed up Planned Parenthood. As noted by Corbett:

“From his mother’s banking family he inherited a ‘nose for the dollar,’ as one childhood friend’s father called it. From his hard-driving legal-minded father, he learned the value of legalizing business arrangements … A ‘nose for the dollar’ and a knowledge of how to use the legal system to get what you want were not the only things to emerge from Bill Gates’ childhood, however.

His parents also encouraged discussion about the family’s charity work and the causes they held close to their heart. As Gates revealed to Bill Moyers in 2003, those causes included ‘the population issue’ which sparked a lifelong interest in ‘reproductive health’ …

The topic is particularly controversial, because ‘population control’ and ‘reproductive health’ have been used for half a century as a euphemism for eugenics, the discredited pseudoscience that holds that certain families are fit to be leaders of society by virtue of their superior genes …

As transparent as it seems to us today that this ideology was a self-serving self-justification for the ruling class, it was quickly taken up as the great social crusade of the early 20th century …

A common eugenicist argument was that the scarce resources of society should not be used to support the lower classes, as that only encouraged more of their kind. Instead, life-saving medical care and intervention should be rationed so that those resources can be best put to use elsewhere.

So-called negative eugenicists even took things further, with some, like famed playwright George Bernard Shaw, calling for people to be called before a state-appointed board to justify their existence or be put to death.”

As noted by Corbett, eugenics was shunned following the second World War thanks to the atrocious acts of the Nazi’s, yet support for it didn’t die out. Instead, the concept of eugenics simply changed into discussions about population control and reproductive health.

“It is worth questioning why this man, who openly muses about death panels and the trade-offs of providing health care to the elderly, is to be taken completely at face value in his attempts to slow population growth in the third world or to handle a coronavirus health crisis that primarily affects the elderly.

That the Gates agenda is being driven by a eugenicist ideology is suggested by multiple lines of evidence, both historical and current,” Corbett says.

Like the Maxwell/Gates family, the Rockefeller family has also been funding and promoting eugenics around the world. They even funded the Eugenics Record Office, a department of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Station for Experimental Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor New York.

As explained on the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory website,

the Eugenics Record Office “was devoted to the collection and analysis of American family genetics and traits history records.” The studies “collected information such as inborn physical, mental and temperamental properties to enable the family to trace the segregation and recombination of inborn or heritable qualities.”

William Welch, the founding director of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, sat on the Eugenics Record Office board of directors, and the Rockefellers sponsored eugenics researchers at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes in Germany, including Ernst Rüdin, who drafted Nazi Germany’s forced sterilization law.

When the American Eugenics Society closed its doors, its long-time director, Frederick Osborne, became the president of the Population Council — another Rockefeller-funded organization. In his 2009 book, “Showing Up for Life,” Gates Sr. expresses his admiration for the Rockefellers’ decades’ long commitment to and involvement in public health, including their support of vaccination programs.

“But the most salacious hints of a deeper agenda are not to be found in the Gates’ public associations, but in the associations that they have tried to hide from the public,” Corbett says. One curious and highly suspicious connection is Gates’ apparent involvement with the now-infamous sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

While Gates has denied knowing Epstein, media reports claim they met on multiple occasions, and were in discussions about co-creating a charitable fund with seed money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and JPMorgan Chase. Corbett notes:

“According to The Times, Gates emailed his colleagues about Epstein in 2011: ‘His lifestyle is very different and kind of intriguing although it would not work for me.’

Epstein’s will even named Boris Nikolic — a Harvard-trained immunologist who served as the chief scientific advisor to both Microsoft and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and who appears in the sole publicly known photo of Epstein and Gates’ 2011 meeting at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion — as the backup executor of Epstein’s estate.

It is not difficult to see why Gates would try to distance himself from his relationship with a child sex trafficker … But, as it turns out, the attempt to suppress the Gates-Epstein story may have been an attempt to suppress the revelation of an altogether different shared interest …

The already scarcely believable Jeffrey Epstein story took another bizarre turn in August of 2019, when it was reported that Epstein ‘Hoped to Seed the Human Race With His DNA.’

As The New York Times explained, Epstein’s plan to impregnate 20 women at a time at his New Mexico ranch in order to ‘seed the human race with his DNA’ — plan he told to a number of the ‘scientific luminaries’ he kept in his orbit — put a modern gloss on a very old idea.”

One of those scientific “luminaries” was George Church, a Harvard geneticist who received funding for various projects from Epstein’s foundation, and who brought forth a proposal for a “genetics dating app.” Epstein and Gates both funded a startup company seeking to use gene editing to eliminate diseases.

“We cannot expect an answer about Bill Gates true motives to come from Gates himself. By this point the question of Bill Gates’ intentions has been buried under the combined weight of hundreds of millions of dollars of paid PR spin,” Corbett says.

“Now we must confront the question of why this man is motivated to build such a web of control — control over our public health agencies. Control over our identities. Control over our transactions. And even control over our bodies …

We must confront the possibility that this quest for control comes not from a selfless spirit of generosity that never seemed to exist before he became a multi-billionaire, but from the same drive for money, the same desire for domination and the same sense of superiority that motivated him on his way up the corporate ladder.

But if the answer to the question “Who is Bill Gates” is “Bill Gates is a eugenicist,” that tells us some important things about the world that we are living in … If Bill Gates is a eugenicist, driven by a belief in the superiority of himself and his fellow wealthy elitists, then what we are facing is not one man, or even one family, but an ideology.

This is not a trivial point. One man, whatever his wealth, can be stopped easily enough. But even if Bill Gates were to be thrown in jail tomorrow, the agenda that has already been set in motion would continue without missing a beat.

An entire infrastructure of researchers, labs, corporations, governmental agencies and public health bodies exists … driven by the belief of all those millions of people working for these various entities that they are truly working in the best interest of the people.

No, an ideology cannot be stopped by stopping one man. It can only be stopped when enough people learn the truth about this agenda and the world of total, pervasive control that is coming into view. If you have watched all four parts of this exploration on Bill Gates, then you are now one of the most informed people on the planet about the true nature of this agenda …

If you have made it this far, it is incumbent on you to help inoculate those around you against the corrupt ideology of Bill Gates and all those who seek to control the population of the world. You must help to spread this information so that others have a chance to see the bigger picture and decide for themselves whether they are willing to roll up their sleeves and accept what is coming, or not.”

Subscribe to Mercola Newsletter

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

Staying Motivated During the Great Awakening

staying-motivated-during-the-great-awakening

Jan 18 • 24M

Discussion on keeping hopes alive during these turbulent times

Open in playerListen on

);

Discussion of the viral news from the last week. No fake news, biases, or agendas but Facts and Truth.

Real Estate Values to Suffer if Negative Population Trends Continue

SUMMARY: This post will try to take a calm look at the bad news. I will show that while we have much to worry about, no imminent demographic catastrophe is coming unless trends worsen. The current tendencies will soon affect demand for housing, leading to a population-driven decline in real estate values.

A few current mortality and birth rate news first:

The UK calculates “excess mortality” based on the previous five years’ average. This, unfortunately, includes 2020 and 2021, which saw excess deaths due to Covid and Covid vaccination. So, the excess mortality for 2022 is therefore understated. Someone did a great job calculating weekly excess mortality based on the 2015-2019 average instead:

This mortality and birth rate news is unfortunate. More than usual, people’s friends, relatives, and loved ones lose their lives. The birth rate news is disappointing: families wanting to have a child may not be able to conceive the baby they dream of having. Each life is valuable, and each death is tragic.

Does it mean that under the current trends, the society we are used to will disappear in a few years? No.

Demographic changes are slow. I created a simple model in a spreadsheet that simulates population trends over the next 50 years. There are parameters, such as the current birth rate, life expectancy, and fertility (number of births per woman) pre-pandemic.

This is a very simplistic model because I am not a demographer. However, it generally captures the essence of demographics and demonstrates what would happen under various assumptions. It calculates:

  • The number of infants born per year, based on the birth rate

  • The number of deaths per year, based on the death rate

Consider a hypothetical country, let’s name it Westonia, with exactly 100,000,000 population. Westonia’s life expectancy is 78 years, and the fertility rate is 1.62 children per woman. This is generally in line with the UK, for instance.

Every year, one out of 78 Westonians dies, and 1.62/2/78 = 0.01 children per person are born. For simplicity, I assume Westonia does not allow immigration or emigration.

We can make two projections: the population at the exact parameters above (no pandemic or vaccines) or the population with excess mortality and birth rate decline factored in (with currently observed mortality and birth rate effects).

We can develop two population projections for the next 50 years: one continuing the pre-pandemic trends and another including excess mortality and reduced birth rate. For example, let’s incorporate 20% excess mortality and 16% reduced birth rate, sort of the worst of what we are seeing now.

The table would begin like this:

Here’s the chart of 50-year trends comparing demographics of Westonia “without pandemic” vs. “with reduced birth rate and excess mortality.”

If the pandemic did not happen, Westonia would have 88.5 million people after 50 years. With reduced births and increased mortality, Westonia would only end up with a population of 71.6 million. The pandemic-related reduction of Westonia’s population is 16 million people. Our hypothetical country would have 24% more people at year 50 had the pandemic not occurred!

Is Westonia, and our green planet, better off with the reduced population? People can have different opinions on this. Let us know what you think.

The important thing is that Westonia would not rapidly “die off” under the current trends — and the population would shrink very slowly.

In the long run, the real estate market is driven by population and household formation.

For example, if a family of two occupies an apartment, it would conceivably start looking for a single-family home after a baby is born.

Similarly, imagine an elderly couple living in a single-family home. If one of the spouses dies, the remaining widower will likely consider selling the home and moving to an apartment.

The problem is that if births are reduced and deaths are increased, the single-family home mentioned above may not find willing buyers!

The effect is not small: in our hypothetical Westonia, during the first year, there will be 166,154 fewer births and 256,410 more deaths, making the combined demand deficit 166154+256410 = 422,564 person-units!

In the US (330 million population,) about 6 million homes are sold yearly. For Westonia, with 100,000,000 people, the comparable annual sales would be about 1.81 million homes. How will the demand deficit of 422,564 “missing persons” affect the market of 1,810,000 homes sold annually?

It would greatly depress home prices!

So home prices may decline, and new construction of homes would not be as economically justified. These market effects greatly depend on our assumptions, of course.

Such home value projections would also be strongly impacted by immigration, which we assumed does not occur to simplify our model. Even then, the effect of reduced births and increased deaths would still depress home prices.

The future is very difficult to predict. Our birth rates could recover. Our death rates could return to normal. This is what I want to happen.

Unthinkably, mortality and birth rates could also get much worse. I have no idea what the future will bring.

The point of the exercise above is to show that the current negative changes would only “move the needle” of population count very slowly over decades.

This means we have time to sound alarms, convene committees, do proper scientific research, and we are not facing any immediate die-off.

Your guess about what will happen to the future is as good as mine. Will birth rates recover? Will deaths go back to normal rates? Are homes still a good investment? Let us know what you think.

Share

FAA admits pilot EKGs are no longer normal in the era of mandatory covid vaccines

Image: FAA admits pilot EKGs are no longer normal in the era of mandatory covid vaccines

(Natural News) Many people missed it because it was done secretly, but after the rollout of covid “vaccines” under Operation Warp Speed, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) changed the EKG parameter range for pilots to prevent them from being grounded.

Since most pilots were forced to get injected in order to keep their jobs, the subsequent heart damage would have put many of them out of a career almost instantly had the FAA not made these changes.

According to Steve Kirsch, who uncovered the change, the October 2022 version of the FAA Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners expands the EKG parameters for pilots from a PR max of 0.2 to 0.3 or even higher – potentially “unlimited.”

“… they didn’t widen the range by a little. They widened it by a lot,” Kirsch notes. “It was done after the vaccine rollout.” (Related: Are covid jabs part of the mark of the beast system?)

“This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it. But you can’t hide these things for long.”

Do you feel safe flying on a plane with a heart-damaged pilot?

The change is not only extraordinary; it is a tacit admission by the United States government that covid jabs do, in fact, destroy the heart. And sadly, most pilots now have destroyed hearts as a result of being forced to get injected.

Kirsch estimates that in addition to these pilots, some 50 million Americans who took the jabs also have heart damage. Depending on their line of work, their hearts may no longer be up to par for their respective job duties.

Brighteon.TV

Sadly, everyone who took the shots, pilots included, is now more likely to test “positive” for covid and get sick. They are also more likely to die suddenly, which could be preceded by various heart conditions like myocarditis or blood clots.

As for pilots, those who would have been grounded under the old EKG maximum but who are still flying planes under the new EKG maximum face suffering a serious cardiac injury in-flight, putting themselves, flight crews, and passengers at risk.

“This is a very wide range,” Kirsch says about the FAA’s new EKG maximum. “[I]t accommodates people who have cardiac injury. Cardiologist Thomas Levy is appalled at this change.”

The general public deserves to know about these changes, which were done in secret, because they affect the safety of air travel. Do you feel like boarding a plane piloted by someone who took the jabs and whose EKG levels now exceed the previous maximum?

Many people’s answer to that question would probably be no, if only they knew that changes were even made in the first place. Most probably assume that everything is the same as it always was, thanks to state-sanctioned secrecy concerning the matter.

Kirsch points to a study out of Puerto Rico showing that a whopping 70 percent of fully vaccinated people, when screened for cardiac injury using an FDA-approved testing device, now show clear signs of heart problems. Do we really want the pilots flying commercial aircraft to be included in that statistic?

“Bottom line: The most logical conclusion is that the FAA knows the hearts of our nation’s pilots have been injured by the COVID vaccine that they were coerced into taking, the number of pilots affected is huge, the cardiac damage is extensive, and passenger safety is being compromised by the lowering of the standards to enable pilots to fly,” Kirsch says.

“The right thing would be for the FAA to come clean and admit to the American public that the COVID vaccine has injured 20% or more of the pilots (based on their limited EKG screening), but I doubt that they will ever do that.”

Want to learn more about the deadliness and ineffectiveness of covid injections? Visit ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

SteveKirsch.substack.com

NaturalNews.com

Dr. Peter McCullough vs. The System: A Battle for his Career

Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., M.P.H. is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, who is at the forefront of the Medical Freedom movement and has been since the onset of COVID-19.

Dr. McCullough joined The DailyClout to discuss his personal struggle with board certification, accusation rebuttals, agency corruption, and the journey toward Medical Freedom. In his words:

“We have a situation here where the American Board of Internal Medicine has completely lost all credibility as an independent, fair balanced organization, and if indeed I’m completely stripped (of medical license) it will effectively terminate my career.”




The Fight for his Career

The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has been systematically attempting to tear down Dr. McCullough’s career. The ABIM is the institution that provides doctors with an official license to practice medicine in their field. Without this certification, obtaining insurance and hospital privileges as a physician is not possible. Dr. McCullough was certified by the ABIM in Internal Medicine in 1991 and in Cardiovascular Disease in 1997. He is among the most published cardiologists in America with more than 1,000 publications and 660 citations in the National Library of Medicine. Included in his published works are dozens of peer-reviewed articles relating to the COVID-19 crisis.

The American Board of Internal Medicine notified Dr. McCullough that his board certification is under review due to his public statements about the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine. Dr. McCullough publicly responded in June of 2022 with a thorough rebuttal that discussed COVID death counts, natural immunity, global vaccine adverse events reporting systems, and conflicts of interest in the development of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. He also requested that he be present or have legal counsel present at the meetings regarding his certification, or a dismissal of the matter altogether.

The ABIM responded to Dr. McCullough’s public rebuttal on October 18, 2022, by dismissing all of his carefully laid out arguments and moving forward with a recommendation to remove his certification while allowing him the opportunity to appeal.

Conflicts of Interest at the CDC, Pfizer+Moderna, and the ABIM Directly Affect Dr. McCullough

Weber Shandwick: The Connecting Link 

Weber Shandwick is one of the world’s leading marketing and public relations firms that represents a variety of major global corporations. As Dr. McCullough discovered,  among its client list are Pfizer and Moderna, and among its campaigns includes “Plan Vx: A Playbook for the Business Response to COVID-19 vaccinations”.

Plan Vx is a downloadable overview of Weber Shandwick’s guide toward solving vaccine hesitancy. Included in the guidebook is Weber Shandwick’s mission statement that “More work is needed to convince Americans – particularly those in the “probably will not” group – to get vaccinated”. The guidebook describes to employers how to cajole and “educate” their employees to stay up to date with their COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations.

CDC Contracts Weber Shandwick  

The CDC granted a contract to Weber Shandwick in the Fall of 2020, to the tune of up to 55 million dollars. Having the same firm represent pharmaceutical companies while simultaneously representing the public agencies that are tasked with regulating said pharma companies is a clear conflict of interest.

Senator Rand Paul noted as such in a letter to the Director of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky on October 24, 2022:

 

 

Weber Shandwick doesn’t try to hide the conflicting nature of representing both the regulatory agency and the pharmaceutical companies simultaneously, and in fact, seems to be proud to be able to implement their “Plan Vx” on behalf of both entities.

  • The website proudly touts that it “partner with clients in the healthcare ecosystem including… drug developers… and government”. 
  • On the “About” page for Susan Howe, the President of Weber Shandwick, it says that she “oversees all Weber Shandwick regions and deepens the strategic integration among the specialist brands within the agency’s ecosystem to drive cross-functional collaboration at global scale.”

Marketing a drug developed by one client while the approval of the drug is under the responsibility of another client, both of whom share the goal of vaccinating as many people on the planet as possible certainly seems to qualify as “cross-functional collaboration at global scale”.

Weber Shandwick Teamed up with ABIM to “Combat false medical information” 

A panel hosted by South by Southwest (SXSW) called “When Doctors Prescribe Misinformation” was organized by the Managing Director of Weber Shandwick. On the panel, along with the Co-Founder of Blackbird.AI sat the Vice President of Weber Shandwick, and Richard Baron, the President and CEO of the very same American Board of Internal Medicine that launched an assault on Dr. McCullough’s career.

One of the main takeaways of the discussion was that in order “to combat false medical information, institutions need to take action against those who provide false or inaccurate information to the public.”

The American Board of Internal Medicine is apparently taking that seriously in their relentless pursuit to discredit Dr. McCullough.

Goals of the ABIM

Since the American Board of Internal Medicine holds a tremendous amount of power over the practice of medicine in the United States, one would assume that its top priorities would include the basic health of the American people, along with the practice of medicine. Unfortunately, that does not seem to be the case. The homepage of the ABIM website looks like this:

The site prominently displays its fight against “Medical Misinformation”. Alongside that goal is their other goal, displayed on top – “Diversity and Health Equity” which looks like this:

Richard Baron, the CEO of the ABIM, who appeared alongside the VP of Weber Shandwick at SXSW, appears to be far more concerned with “diversity” and “misinformation” than he is with ensuring that American patients get treated properly. The ABIM seems so focused on combatting what it’s already deemed to be “misinformation” that it won’t engage with those they’re disparaging in order to listen to the information they are trying to share. Richard Baron’s Twitter page is almost entirely focused on the two goals of DEI and “misinformation”:

Dr. McCullough never had an issue with the ABIM before he challenged the Weber Shandwick/Pfizer/Moderna/CDC narrative. He successfully treated thousands of patients throughout the pandemic and created an effective protocol that led to safe treatment for countless patients.

The attempt to strip Dr. McCullough of his credentials and halt him from treating patients within the traditional medical system should be recognized as an egregious overreach by an institution that refuses to directly engage with the professional it threatens.

The ABIM launched an initiative called ” Building Trust.org -Counteracting Medical Misinformation”. That organization will be holding a public Zoom panel tomorrow which will include Ms. Pamela Browner White, Senior Vice President of Communications & Chief Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer, ABIM & ABIM Foundation. The link to signup for the session is here.

Dr. Peter McCullough is also the Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company. His tremendous contributions to health and the practice of medicine deserve the support of the Medical Freedom movement.

Support DailyClout

https://dailyclout.io/donate/

Become a Member Today

https://dailyclout.io/memberships/

 

The post Dr. Peter McCullough vs. The System: A Battle for his Career appeared first on DailyClout.