Alec Baldwin responds after being charged with manslaughter in the on-set shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins

Image: Alec Baldwin responds after being charged with manslaughter in the on-set shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins

(Natural News) Actor Alec Baldwin has furiously responded after he was charged with involuntary manslaughter after shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins while on the set of a movie he was making called “Rust.”

In a statement issued by his attorney, the actor is obviously furious over the decision of the district attorney to press charges.

“This decision distorts Halyna Hutchins’ tragic death and represents a terrible miscarriage of justice. Mr. Baldwin had no reason to believe there was a live bullet in the gun – or anywhere on the movie set. He relied on the professionals with whom he worked, who assured him the gun did not have live rounds. We will fight these charges, and we will win,” his attorney Luke Nikas said, as Access Hollywood reported.

In addition to Baldwin, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the on-set armorer — the person in charge of all firearms used in production whose job it is to make sure every weapon is safe before being handed to an actor — was also charged with involuntary manslaughter. Also, Assistant Director David Halls has agreed to cop a plea to a charge of negligent use of a deadly weapon. No charges were filed in relation to the non-fatal wounding of director Joel Souza.

“After a thorough review of the evidence and the laws of the state of New Mexico, I have determined that there is sufficient evidence to file criminal charges against Alec Baldwin and other members of the ‘Rust’ film crew,” New Mexico First Judicial District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies said. “On my watch, no one is above the law, and everyone deserves justice.”

Brighteon.TV

The family of Hutchins has also released a statement supportive of Carmack-Altwies’ decision.

“We want to thank the Santa Fe Sheriff and the District Attorney for concluding their thorough investigation and determining that charges for involuntary manslaughter are warranted for the killing of Halyna Hutchins with conscious disregard for human life,” the family said via attorney Brian J. Panish. “Our independent investigation also supports charges are warranted. It is a comfort to the family that, in New Mexico, no one is above the law. We support the charges, will fully cooperate with this prosecution, and fervently hope the justice system works to protect the public and hold accountable those who break the law.”

The shooting took place at a “western” town built especially for filming in the state of New Mexico, which is why authorities from that state are charging Baldwin.

According to Access Hollywood:

Under New Mexico law, if found guilty of involuntary manslaughter, it is a fourth-degree felony, and they could face up to 18 months in jail and a $5,000 fine.

If found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act would require proof that there was more than simple negligence involved in a death. This charge is also a fourth-degree felony punishable by up to 18 months in jail and up to a $5000 fine. This charge includes a firearm enhancement, a mandatory penalty, because a firearm was involved. The firearm enhancement makes the crime punishable by a mandatory five years in jail.

“If any one of these three people—Alec Baldwin, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed or David Halls—had done their job, Halyna Hutchins would be alive today. It’s that simple,” said Andrea Reeb, the special prosecutor appointed by the DA to try the case. “The evidence clearly shows a pattern of criminal disregard for safety on the ‘Rust’ film set. In New Mexico, there is no room for film sets that don’t take our state’s commitment to gun safety and public safety seriously.”

Formal charges are expected to be filed by the end of January, the report added.

“There is a very clear process for pursuing justice in this case,” Carmack-Altwies said. “We are committed to upholding the integrity of that process to ensure equal justice under the law.”

Sources include:

AccessHollywood.com

NaturalNews.com

German bishop outlines new guidelines, mandates priests accept homosexuality, transgenderism

Image: German bishop outlines new guidelines, mandates priests accept homosexuality, transgenderism

(Natural News) Leftists have taken over nearly every institution that made Western civilization so successful and great, including the Christian faith, as evidenced by the growing number of denominations now actively advocating the opposite of what Jesus and the Bible teach.

The latest example comes from Germany, where a Catholic bishop there has just laid out new guidelines that require priests in the diocese to accept homosexuality and transgenderism, in direct conflict with God’s word.

For the record, the Christian faith does not advocate harming or shunning such individuals (unlike other religions). Instead, the Bible simply describes what constitutes improper behavior in the context that man was put on this Earth to “go forth and multiply” and to live together with the opposite sex.

“The head of the German bishops’ Conference (DBK) introduced binding guidelines on sexual education for all parishes in his diocese that force them to accept and promote homosexuality and transgenderism,” LifeSite News reported this week. “According to these 10 guidelines, ‘there is diversity in sexual identity and orientation.’”

The guidelines note further:

The appreciative handling of these differences and diversity should be actively promoted in the parishes and institutions. The choice of lifestyle is to be respected as the result of an individual and personal decision. It is to be recognized when partners take responsibility for each other in mutual fidelity and care. Furthermore, we welcome it when couples wish to place their partnership under the blessing of God.

Brighteon.TV

These guidelines were established by Bishop Georg Bätzing, who heads the heterodox Synodal Way as well as the DBK, on May 17, 2022, but they were just revealed this week during an online event from the diocese of Limburg, LifeSite News continued.

“Every person has the right to sexual self-determination and the free choice over their own life decisions,” the guidelines say, according to the outlet. “This must be promoted and respected.”

“Sexual self-determination” also apparently means including transgenderism because the guidelines also mention people who “feel neither as a woman nor as a man.”

“It must be a goal that people are supported in their sexual self-determination, to which every person has a right,” the guidelines continue. “This requires that people are supported and encouraged in this freedom, but at the same time strengthened to refrain from behavior that impairs or harms other people in their self-determination.”

LifeSite News noted further:

According to this passage, priests would be forbidden to call to repentance Catholics who engage in sinful sexual acts, including homosexual acts, since that would “impair or harm” them “in their sexual self-determination.”

Bätzing’s new guidelines are in direct opposition to the immutable teaching of the Catholic Church on sexuality. The Catholic Church has infallibly taught since its beginning that homosexual acts are gravely sinful and that same-sex attraction is disordered. 

Here’s what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says, however, per the outlet: “Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity (Cf. Genesis 19:1-29; Romans 1:24-27; 1 Corinthians 6:10; 1 Timothy 1:10), tradition has always declared that ‘homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.’ (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,?Persona humana, 8). They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity.?Under no circumstances can they be approved.”

As such, no member of the Church can simply alter teachings about acts of homosexuality because they are “intrinsically disordered,” per the Catechism. So, these acts are always sinful regardless of the circumstances; homosexual acts are contrary to natural law since, according to the Church, the natural end of sex is to conceive a child.

But here’s what’s going on. Church attendance has been falling steadily for years, so in response, members of the Church are trying to ‘bend the rules’ to attract more people, even if they have to do so by breaking tradition. Only, the more they break tradition, the more faithful leave the Church.

Western society is on a crash course with the ashbin of history. It’s inevitable at this point.

Sources include:

LifeSiteNews.com

NaturalNews.com

POLITICAL COURAGE: Ron DeSantis wants Florida Legislature to permanently ban COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates

Image: POLITICAL COURAGE: Ron DeSantis wants Florida Legislature to permanently ban COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates

(Natural News) Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wants the state legislature to pass a law that would permanently outlaw all Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) mask and vaccine mandates in the Sunshine State.

In a rally in Panama City Beach packed with the governor’s supporters, DeSantis called the measure making the mandate ban permanent a “prescription for freedom” that is necessary to keep the state’s economy open.

He added that mask and vaccine mandates deny people from earning a living, prevent parents from sending their children to school, discriminate against people based on their vaccination status and silence doctors who spoke up regarding their opposition to mandatory health regulations. (Related: DeSantis says COVID jabs being used by “globalist elites to depopulate the planet.”)

“We believe there’s no turning back from our direction,” said DeSantis. “This is just nuts that we’re still doing this. We need to lead with this by making all of these protections permanent in the Florida statutes, which we are going to do in the upcoming legislative session.”

Rick Wiles and Doc Burkhart, co-hosts of TruNews, reported on this development and expressed their support.

“I’m a proud Floridian. We have the best governor in the United States,” said Wiles. “I’m very happy with Gov. DeSantis and I’m glad I’m living in the state of Florida.”

“I’d love to see Ron DeSantis in the White House, but I also don’t want him to leave the State of Florida,” he added.

Brighteon.TV

DeSantis proposal to expand on existing Florida laws

DeSantis’ proposal will attempt to make permanent a series of laws passed by the Florida Legislature in November 2021 following a special session aimed at restricting businesses in the state from following federal directives requiring mask mandates or requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

If both houses of the state legislature approve of DeSantis’ wishes, the measure will continue to prohibit COVID-19 vaccine and mask requirements in schools and government and prohibit vaccination requirements for travel or employment.

DeSantis also wants the state government to expand these previous measures by prohibiting employers from being able to hire or fire Floridians based on vaccination status or wearing a mask.

Furthermore, the governor wants to revive a failed proposal from last year’s legislative session that would make it more difficult for medical licensing boards to reprimand or sanction doctors for expressing views contrary to mainstream medical opinions.

“Being the free state of Florida did not happen by accident. It required us over the past few years to stand against major institutions in our society: The bureaucracy, the medical establishment, legacy media and even the president of the United States who, together, were working to impose a bio-medical security state on society,” said DeSantis.

The Florida Legislature reconvenes for its upcoming session in March. The set of provisions banning mask and vaccine mandates will expire on June 1, 2023. This will give the incoming legislature, which features a Republican supermajority in both houses, just three months to push through the permanent bans.

Learn more about COVID-19 vaccine and mask policies at Pandemic.news.

Watch this video from TruNews going in-depth on Gov. Ron DeSantis’ proposal to permanently ban mask and vaccine mandates.

This video is from the TruNews channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Appeals court upholds decision to block Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for government contractors.

Ron DeSantis says Florida will petition state Supreme Court to empanel grand jury for coronavirus vaccine probe.

DeSantis promises to hold Pfizer, Moderna accountable for making false claims about COVID “vaccines.”

Tragedies lead doctors like Aseem Malhotra to question mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations.

Ben Armstrong lauds Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, lawyer Thomas Renz for exposing flaws of COVID-19 vaccines.

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

OrlandoSentinel.com

TampaBay.com

Tallahassee.com

Report: Conservatives boycotted Bed Bath & Beyond after it cancelled MyPillow and Mike Lindell

Image: Report: Conservatives boycotted Bed Bath & Beyond after it cancelled MyPillow and Mike Lindell

(Natural News) A recent report revealed that conservatives have staged a boycott of home goods retailer Bed Bath & Beyond (BBB) after it cancelled MyPillow and its CEO Mike Lindell.

According to a Jan. 18 post by the Gateway Pundit, BBB initially dropped MyPillow products from its stores in January 2021. The retailer’s move became a cause for celebration among liberals, including the MeidasTouch political action committee (PAC) established by the three Meiselas brothers.

The PAC confronted BBB on Twitter, asking why the election integrity activist and entrepreneur was given both a wall display and why the retail chain stocked his products. It asked: “Do you support martial law and insurrection?” A later tweet by MeidasTouch confirmed that BBB “has now officially dropped MyPillow,” with the PAC thanking the store “for siding with democracy.”

The retailer explained that it dropped Lindell’s products from its stores because they weren’t selling enough. “As previously announced, we have been rationalizing our assortment to discontinue a number of under-performing items and brands. This includes the MyPillow product line,” a BBB spokesperson told Yahoo Finance in a statement.

Lindell insisted, however, that BBB ditching his products was political – citing, in particular, his ties to former President Donald Trump. He also alleged that “left-wing groups that attack with bots and trolls” were pressuring retailers to stop doing business with him. Yahoo Finance also mentioned that several businesses have cut ties with Trump himself – including Deutsche Bank, Shopify, Salesforce and Stripe.

Brighteon.TV

“These businesses are scared because they think if they associate with Trump, they’re going to be attacked just like MyPillow is right now,” said Lindell. “They’re afraid. They’re very afraid for their own livelihood.”

Still, the MyPillow CEO reiterated that he will continue to stand by Trump regardless of any pressure it puts on his business. He also emphasized that the 2020 elections that put President Joe Biden in the White House “was the most corrupt election in the history of the world.”

BBB’s dropping of MyPillow comes at a huge price

The Gateway Pundit piece stated that conservatives responded after BBB dissociated itself from MyPillow: “Many boycotted BBB and bought directly from MyPillow. Now, BBB is closing stores – nearly 150 at last count.”

It also attached screenshots of tweets from several users explaining why they patronized MyPillow.

User @barbara_lampkin wrote: “I stopped shopping [at BBB] and other places when they screwed Lindell’s MyPillow Company because [he] was revealing the truth about the stolen election. Go woke, go broke.”

User @patriothippieca, meanwhile, said she hasn’t shopped at a BBB outlet since it discontinued carrying MyPillow. “I’ll take the inconvenience and rather shop direct,” she remarked, adding that she needed a second set of sheets.

“I used to like [BBB], but I haven’t set foot inside one of their stores since they stabbed MyPillow in the back. I never will either, unless they bring back MyPillow,” said user @YorakHu51501644.

While BBB’s dissociation with Lindell proved to be a golden opportunity for the entrepreneur and election integrity activist, it served as the beginning of the end for the home goods retailer.

Aside from announcing the closure of around 150 stores across the country, BBB is now speaking with potential buyers to keep it afloat in case it files for bankruptcy. (Related: Bed Bath & Beyond bet on China and lost: After kicking Mike Lindell’s MyPillow to the curb, chain losing money and closing stores.)

According to a CNBC report, BBB “warned it may need to file for bankruptcy after its turnaround plans failed to substantially boost sales and repair its balance sheet. The company reported net losses that exceed $1.12 billion for the first nine months of the fiscal year.”

Watch Mike Lindell talk about how Minnesota Bank & Trust de-banked him and nine other entities connected to him on “Bannon’s War Room.”

This video is from the Mainly Infowars/Banned.Video channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

LISTEN as Health Ranger talks to MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell about America, prosperity and hope in Jesus.

MyPillow founder Mike Lindell vows to sue DOJ, FBI after agency seized his cellphone: ‘This has to stop.’

Right Side Broadcasting censored MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell for warning about coronavirus vaccines.

Dr. John Diamond calls for NATIONWIDE BOYCOTT of Hershey’s products.

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, related entities de-banked.

Sources include:

TheGatewayPundit.com

Finance.Yahoo.com

CNBC.com

Brighteon.com

UT Austin bans TikTok on campus, citing security concerns

Image: UT Austin bans TikTok on campus, citing security concerns

(Natural News) The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) has banned the use of Chinese video app TikTok on campus networks, following security concerns brought up by state and federal officials.

UT Austin announced in Jan. 17 that it is permanently blocking TikTok’s access on its systems. Devices connected to the campus network via Wi-Fi or wired connections will be prohibited from accessing the app. The move was in line with an order by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott banning all state employees and officers from downloading or using TikTok on government-issued devices.

“The university is taking these important steps to eliminate risks to information contained in the university’s network, and to our critical infrastructure,” wrote Jeff Nyland, adviser to the UT president for technology strategy.

“As outlined in the governor’s directive, TikTok harvests vast amounts of data from its user’s devices – including when, where and how they conduct internet activity – and offers this trove of potentially sensitive information to the Chinese government.”

Nyland wrote that “legitimate uses of TikTok to support university functions … will be considered.” However, an exemption must first be requested through UT’s Information Security Office. The said exemption must ultimately be reviewed and approved by the university president, university chancellor and the governor’s office.

Once approved, any exemptions will require TikTok to be accessed on “an isolated, single-purpose university-issued device not connected to the university’s Wi-Fi or wired network.”

Brighteon.TV

UT Austin is not the only higher education institution that banned TikTok.

In December 2022, the University of Oklahoma announced it would ban internet access to TikTok. This followed an executive order by Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt banning government networks and devices from accessing the video-sharing app.

Boise State University also blocked access to TikTok on its networks following an order from Idaho Gov. Brad Little. It said students who want to access the app may do so using their own mobile data plan. Auburn University also blocked the app on its network after a similar edict by Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey. (Related: Alabama, Utah ban TikTok on state-owned devices over security concerns.)

TikTok now banned in several states

State and federal officials are concerned about whether the Chinese government can access data from American users through TikTok. At least 25 states have announced prohibitions on TikTok, citing national security concerns.

In December 2022, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox announced a ban on TikTok. His edict ordered that state employees may not download the app, access it or visit any TikTok website on state-owned devices. Cox’s order applies to all agencies under the executive branch in the Beehive State.

“China’s access to data collected by TikTok presents a threat to our cybersecurity,” thbige governor said in a statement. “As a result, we’ve deleted our TikTok account and ordered the same on all state-owned devices. We must protect Utahns and make sure that the people of Utah can trust the state’s security systems.”

In late November 2022, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem announced a ban on TikTok on state-owned devices through an executive order that immediately took effect.

“South Dakota will have no part in the intelligence-gathering operations of nations who hate us,” she said in a press release. “The Chinese Communist Party uses information that it gathers on TikTok to manipulate the American people, and they gather data off the devices that access the platform.”

Watch this G News report about Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan banning TikTok on state devices.

This video is from the Chinese taking down EVIL CCP channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

US lawmakers unveil bipartisan bill to ban TikTok.

Indiana sues Tiktok over consumer data access and sexual content.

Taiwan bans TikTok from government devices, mulls nationwide prohibition.

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem bans TikTok on state-owned devices, citing app’s intelligence gathering operations.

Sources include:

SCMP.com

IT.UTexas.edu

MSN.com=

BusinessInsider.com

Brighteon.com

Joe Rogan and Bret Weinstein: COVID-19 Blunder

  • Bret Weinstein, an evolutionary theorist, discussed some of the most heavily censored topics today on “The Joe Rogan Experience”

  • From the initial allowance of gain-of-function research to the botched pandemic response, Weinstein believes the COVID-19 pandemic is the largest blunder in human history

  • Research published in Science Immunology reveals a “mind blowing” finding that after three doses of mRNA COVID-19 shots, your immune system may be triggered not to fight

  • As SARS-CoV-2 spread through the population, fear was used to make the population compliant

  • Weinstein explores the possibility that a select group may have had advance notice of the impending pandemic and used that knowledge to position themselves for a financial windfall

Visit Mercola Market

Advertisement

Bret Weinstein, an evolutionary theorist, author of “A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century” and host of “The DarkHorse Podcast” was interviewed on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” discussing some of the most heavily censored topics today.

From discussing why he believes COVID-19 is the “biggest blunder in human history” to how COVID-19 shots may make the human immune system unable to fight off pathogens, the interview is as riveting as it is pertinent to public health.

At the root of the problem is censorship, which has buried information that could have turned the tide of the COVID-19 pandemic early on, and the intentional act of keeping people in the dark, which may have paved the way for massive wealth transfer ahead of the pandemic.

Weinstein begins by discussing how the narrative has been able to get so out of control, with free speech openly dampened by those in control. He calls the concept “zero is a special number”:

“The idea of zero as a special number is that this narrative control would not work if there was even one newspaper that was dedicated to the job of reporting the news. It wouldn’t work if there was even one university that was dedicated to finding what the truth might be. Right?

It doesn’t work if there’s one social media platform in a primary position in which free speech reigns, because in any of these cases, if you had the university that was still interested in truth seeking in an era where everybody else was doing their diversity, equity and inclusion thing, every reasonable person would wanna send their kid there, right?

So it would win in competition almost immediately, and the result would be every other institution would have to change their policy to compete. So if you get even one exception, that’s enough to break this pattern.”

What we face is a corporate stronghold over media combined with a state-run propaganda machine. Countless private-public partnerships between government and corporations bind the two camps together in a pact to dictate “truth” to the public. Weinstein believes Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter is an attempt to become that single exception, which is why you’re seeing so many people publicly announcing that they’re leaving the platform:

“The structure that is controlling the narrative understands that it cannot endure that [Twitter becoming a platform for free speech]. And so far it has failed to shut down Elon.

So their next move is actually to get people on one side of this debate to leave so that they can’t prevent Twitter from being a space where people can speak freely, but they can take it out of the position of being a primary social media environment. And in so doing, they will take the number of meaningful exceptions to the free speech control back to zero. That’s what they’re up to.”

Initially, Weinstein didn’t think the issue of labeling mRNA COVID-19 shots “vaccines” was a big issue, but he’s since changed his mind. “Lots of people were upset by the redefinition of the term vaccine,” he says. “I wasn’t convinced it was an important issue. I have switched sides on this. I now think the definition is vitally important and we’re beginning to see why.”

The No. 1 reason why Weinstein believes COVID-19 shots are not vaccines is because they do not create immunity to the pathogen. They also use a very different technology than that used by typical vaccines. But if the government began touting a new gene therapy, people would have questioned it. Weinstein explains:

“What they’ve done is they’ve smuggled in a really, truly radically new technology. And they caused us all not to worry about it very much by using the term vaccine, right? If they had said, alright, we’ve got this pandemic and in order to prevent it from spreading, we’re gonna have everybody take gene therapy.

Everybody would’ve said, what? Gene therapy is that safe? So the point is we had a category and it was called vaccine. And we all thought, you know, there are some crazy folks who are worried about vaccines, but in general, it’s safe. So if something carries that label, it’s probably safe too.”

As Weinstein and his wife, Heather Heying, an evolutionary biologist and cohost of “The DarkHorse Podcast,” dug deeper, they realized there was no way anyone could know whether COVID-19 shots were safe. “We looked at these technologies and thought, wow, you are intervening in a nested series of complex systems in a way that you can’t possibly predict the outcome.”

This brought them to the work of Geert Vanden Bossche, Ph.D., a vaccinology expert and former global director of vaccine programs, including work for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He’s been heavily censored because he’s among those who have warned about immune escape due to the pressure being placed upon the virus during the mass COVID-19 shot campaign.

Bossche describes a general principle in biology, vaccinology and microbiology that if you put living organisms like bacteria or viruses under pressure, via antibiotics, antibodies or chemotherapeutics, for example, but don’t kill them off completely, you can inadvertently encourage their mutation into more virulent strains. Those that escape your immune system end up surviving and selecting mutations to ensure their further survival.

SARS-CoV-2 has a high capacity for mutation but, according to Bossche, if the virus isn’t under pressure, it won’t necessarily see a need to select mutations to, for instance, become more infectious. But if you put it under pressure, as occurred during the mass vaccination campaign — or as Bossche calls it the “one big experiment” — this changes. Weinstein says:

“What he said is, look, if you vaccinate into a pandemic and you do so broadly across the population, you’re going to drive the evolution of variants … You are going to create an evolutionary arms race, and you were going to cause the number of variants to proliferate.

And, you know, at the time, I couldn’t say for sure that he was right, but what I could say was that he was making evolutionary sense. There was nothing terribly complex about his argument, and it was robust. And I think now we are seeing … that proliferation of variants.”

Research published in Science Immunology

reveals a “mind blowing” finding that after three doses of mRNA COVID-19 shots, your immune system may be triggered not to fight. “It’s a very dangerous discovery,” Weinstein says, that has to do with an elevation in the percentage of IgG4 antibodies:

“IgG4 is actually part of a system in which the body attenuates its own response to an antigen. So the mind blowing, and you know, it’s an early result, maybe it doesn’t get replicated, but … the implication is that the evolutionary path we have traveled is causing the pathogen now to be able to trigger a response that will cause the immune system not to fight. Nobody knows what happens next …

So the idea that a pathogen, and mind you, not a normal pathogen, a pathogen that we can now be pretty darn certain was engineered by humans, at least in part, that pathogen is now triggering that signal that causes the immune system not to react anymore, means we’re in a whole new landscape.”

Another potential mechanism of harm involves Marc Girardot’s Bolus Theory

and what happens if a COVID-19 shot, or any shot which is intended to be injected into the muscle, accidentally gets injected into a blood vessel, a demonstrated regular occurrence in hospitals. According to Girardot:

“Say the direct IV injection of a dose of Pfizer [COVID-19 shot] is diluted by 30 by the time it gets to the aorta, you’d have around 10,000 lipid nanoparticles hitting each square millimeter of endothelium during the very brief passage of the bolus.

Let’s imagine 10% of these vaccine particles penetrate a cell when they hit it. That means that up to 1,000 cells will end up destroyed by the immune system. That’s more than 100% of the cells in that area! Likely irreparable, similar to a third-degree burn.

In the case of a proper intramuscular injection, the maximum concentration would be 25 lipid nanoparticles presenting themselves to the same 1 sq.mm. of endothelial surface. Only three would be uptaken, or less 0.4% of the surface would end up destroyed. Those three cell gaps would be fixed within minutes of the immune attack. And life would go on.

This brief physical phenomenon, similar to an avalanche crashing through your vascular system, is in my opinion the cause of all the adverse effects we have witnessed these past two years, and that have occurred for decades.”

Weinstein says he knew very early on in the pandemic that SARS-CoV-2 did not appear to be of natural origin. Further, it didn’t appear to be due to a simple laboratory escape either, but rather was a highly unusual pathogen with “unprecedented genetic alteration” — one that was likely enhanced in a laboratory before it escaped. Even the way it behaves in the human body, harming everything from toes to circulation to the brain is unusual:

“There’s a reason that a normal pathogen doesn’t do the widescale damage that COVID seems to, and that reason is that, in general, pathogens don’t have an interest in harming you … In fact, they do best when you are healthy enough to walk around and spread them.

And so they tend to spare tissues that do not help them to be transmitted. Well, that’s not the case with this pathogen. This pathogen seems to invade all kinds of tissues that don’t help it to spread.”

The presence of a furin cleavage site on SARS-CoV-2, which is what makes it so transmissible and able to invade tissue so effectively, is another smoking gun. “That’s something that we knew would take a coronavirus and cause it to be highly effective in humans. We knew that before SARS-CoV-2 ever emerged. So, to find it on this virus, even though no other member of the subfamily has it, is conspicuous,” he says.

The lengths that the mainstream narrative has gone to discredit the lab-origin theory also hint at its relevance:

“Why are they continually trying to reanimate the explanation that this is a natural spillover event? Because if it isn’t, then we know who did it, right? Anthony Fauci was key to circumventing the ban on gain-of-function research that resulted in the Wuhan lab being funded by us [the U.S.] to do this work. So if this was a natural spillover event from a wet market, then Anthony Fauci is in the clear, right?

If this is the result of ill-conceived gain-of-function research taking place in Wuhan, partially at our direction, that’s a whole different ballgame … those who are responsible cannot allow a full investigation.

I don’t know what will happen if the truth were to fully emerge about, not only what was the explanation for how this virus came into the world when it came into the world … but also what we failed to do, … we failed to deploy …

Because we didn’t deal with the pathogen properly at the beginning, because we didn’t deploy the drugs that we had at our disposal that did work, we ran out the clock on the brief period of time when we might have driven it extinct or at least controlled it.”

From the initial allowance of gain-of-function research to the botched pandemic response, Weinstein believes the COVID-19 pandemic is the largest blunder in human history. He asks poignant questions, like what would have happened if we had treated COVID-19 the way we treat other emerging pathogens — with trial and error and open discussion until the best course of treatment is identified.

“[If] we just let doctors figure out how to treat it … they would’ve gotten rapidly better at treating this disease, and they would’ve discovered all of the compounds that work. And they would’ve talked to each other about in what way to deploy those compounds, at what dosage. They would’ve discovered all of that stuff,” Weinstein says.

Instead, as SARS-CoV-2 spread through the population, fear was used to make the population compliant. Data was manipulated, with COVID-19 deaths including people who died “with” COVID, not from it.

“Those numbers caused us to think the pathogen was something other than it was. And it is obvious to anyone seriously analyzing this that COVID isn’t a dangerous pathogen. SARS-CoV-2 is a dangerous pathogen. I’m very worried about where it goes. But the case fatality rate is not one that should have caused us to vaccinate literally billions of people,” Weinstein explains.

A tweet featured in the interview claimed to be from a doctor who defended her choice to get a COVID-19 shot, saying she did it out of love while antivaxxers were acting out of hate. The tweet turned out to be fake,

but its sentiment was not a far stretch from reality, as friends, families and colleagues have been torn apart over differing viewpoints during the pandemic.

This divisiveness is not happenstance; it’s very much intentional. “One of the best ways to not look at people as being human is to categorize them as an enemy in some way,” Weinstein says, mentioning mass formation, which involves the formation of a hypnotic state around a shared consensus.

“The mass formation appears to be downstream of an industrial strength propaganda campaign,” Weinstein says. “A very expensive one designed to create these unsolvable puzzles for people so that they would end up in this mindset.”

The solution begins with continuing to share and spread the truth, and coming together toward this end. “If we don’t do that, then we head into further and further polarization.”

Meanwhile, Weinstein explores the possibility that a select group may have had advance notice of the impending pandemic and used that knowledge to position themselves for a financial windfall — and a “cryptic, massive transfer of wealth:”

“There’s been lots of talk in various publications at this point about the possibility that COVID was circulating earlier than we knew … If you know that a pandemic is coming and that it is going to spread around the globe, and it is going to cause all kinds of alterations, you can, you know, short stocks for cruise ships or airplanes, hotels, right? You can invest in pharmaceutical companies that have useful technologies …

And so the question is, how much of the story here involves something having understood what was coming and having revealed it at a point that it was positioned rather than it having emerged naturally? … I’m as much an outsider to this as anybody, but I will say there’s a version of the story in which our being kept in the dark is a perpetual source of wealth.”

Subscribe to Mercola Newsletter

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.