Glyphosate is spreading further into the ecosystem, now detected in surviving wildflowers and bee pollen

Image: Glyphosate is spreading further into the ecosystem, now detected in surviving wildflowers and bee pollen

(Natural News) Glyphosate, the infamous carcinogen in Round Up, has become pervasive in the ecosystem, destroying the integrity of the food supply and contributing to immunosuppression in humans. This chemical is still the most frequently used weed killer in the EU, despite its links to immunosuppression and cancer.

Glyphosate and its main metabolite, aminomethylphosphonic acid, (AMPA) have previously been detected in the pollen of plants that were sprayed directly by the herbicide. Glyphosate has even been detected in the nectar that bees collect from targeted plants. Now, a group of Irish scientists have found glyphosate residue in the nectar of wildflowers that have NOT been sprayed directly with the weedkiller.

Surviving wildflowers now contain toxic levels of glyphosate, poisoning pollinators

This is the first time that scientists have reported glyphosate in unsprayed wildflowers under conventional farming conditions. Worse yet, the glyphosate levels that were detected in wildflowers exceed the maximum amount permitted by European regulators, as it pertains to honey and honey bee products.

In the study, researchers investigated glyphosate exposure after it was used as a desiccant. As a desiccant, glyphosate is sprayed onto crops as a pre-harvest treatment to regulate plant growth and ripening. The research spanned seven fields of oilseed rape in East and Southeast Ireland, from two separate planting seasons. The researchers collected the pollen and bee nectar from the blackberry flowers that grow on the edge of these fields. The glyphosate residues in the blackberry flowers were detected at upwards of 10% of the applied rate. Studies show that 1–5% of the recommended application rate can negatively impact pollinators.


These illegal levels of glyphosate suggest that the herbicide could be negatively affecting honeybee populations. This is not good news for organic agriculture, honeybee colonies, or the food supply. As glyphosate infects the natural environment, it won’t matter whether honeybees engage directly with plants sprayed with glyphosate or whether they take up the nectar from natural wildflowers. Glyphosate has become a pervasive poison, nevertheless. It’s bad enough that honeybee populations are starved of diverse nutritional sources because glyphosate has already wiped-out several wildflower populations. Now, the honeybees are being poisoned by the plants that are barely surviving along the glyphosate-ridden fields.

Glyphosate negatively affects the food supply, honeybee populations, and human health

Glyphosate targets 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase — an essential enzyme that is part of the shikimate pathway of plants. The biotech industry has genetically engineered seeds to withstand their poison. This allows the biotech industry to retain monopolistic control over the food supply and allows for unchecked poisoning of the ecosystem.

The shikimate pathway is also present in the microbiome of humans. This is why glyphosate acts as an antibiotic in humans, destroying gut bacteria that are essential to the human immune system. Glyphosate also harms the digestive system of honeybees and bumblebees, making colonies more vulnerable to infections.

The loss of pollinators is the number one issue affecting global production of nuts, fruits, and vegetables. The loss of pollinators causes an annual production loss of 3-5% for these nutrient-dense foods. This profoundly impacts the well being of hundreds of thousands of people, and could spiral into a food supply and nutrition crisis that further exacerbates the malnutrition and immunosuppression problem that is currently plaguing the world population.

The researchers conclude: In advance of, and to inform the upcoming renewal of market authorization for glyphosate in the European Union, we recommend the immediate investigation of glyphosate as desiccant before harvesting crops, to elucidate the behavior of glyphosate residues in soil and non-target flowering plants growing near crop fields, over a period of several days after the desiccant spraying.”

Sources include:

Scientists pressuring FDA to approve use of bioengineered animal organs in human transplants

Image: Scientists pressuring FDA to approve use of bioengineered animal organs in human transplants

(Natural News) Startups in the field of bioengineering are attempting to get the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve trials involving transplanting animal organs into humans.

One of the first-of-its-kind xenotransplants occurred in January 2022, when 57-year-old David Bennett, a man with late-stage heart failure from Maryland, received the heart of a pig.

Bennett was too sick to be eligible for a traditional human transplant, which is why a biotech company, United Therapeutics, genetically engineered the heart of a pig to reduce the risk of immune rejection. This heart was then transplanted into him.

The initial results of the operation were promising, but Bennett died within two months after the operation. His official cause of death is still being determined, with mainstream medical opinions claiming it is not due to organ rejection.

United Therapeutics is undeterred by Bennett’s death, and the company believes that formal trials of pig organs in living human subjects could begin as early as 2024. (Related: Japan to legalize “organ transplant farms” of animals to be raised and slaughtered for human transplant organs.)

Scientists employed by biotech companies like United Therapeutics believe studying the creation of bioengineered replacement organs could be the key to easing the nation’s organ transplant shortage.

Miromatrix, which is based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is another company experimenting with turning pig organs into ones that resemble human organs. Miromatrix CEO Jeff Ross hopes the company can conduct a first-of-its-kind human testing of a bioengineered organ by the end of the year – if the FDA agrees.


If the FDA does sign off on this trial, the initial experiment will be conducted outside of the volunteer patient’s body.

The first trial will test to see if a bioengineered pig liver could be used in people. To transform this pig liver, Miromatrix scientists create a kind of “scaffold” of a liver.

To do this, the liver’s pig cells are dissolved and flushed out to turn the organ into a ghostly, semi-translucent scaffold with a rubbery texture. Once this stage is complete, this scaffold is then infused with human liver cells taken from donated organs unable to be transplanted. These living cells get absorbed into the nooks and crannies of the scaffold to restart its functions.

“We essentially regrow the organ,” said Ross. “Because we remove all the cells from that pig organ, our bodies won’t see it as a pig organ anymore.”

Miromatrix CEO warns of xenotransplantation’s potential dangers

More than 105,000 people are currently on waiting lists in the United States for organ transplants. Thousands of these people will die before they get their turn, and thousands more never even get put on the list, with their chances of recovery considered too much of a long shot to allow a resource as valuable as an organ to be put in their bodies.

This is why scientists and physicians alike are looking at animals as another source of organs, and the FDA itself is strongly considering whether to allow more experiments with xenotransplantation using the gene-edited organs of pigs.

“The number of organs we have available are never going to be able to meet the demand,” said Dr. Amit Tevar, a transplant surgeon at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. “This is our frustration.”

With bioengineered organs, physicians wouldn’t have to wait for people to sign up to donate their organs and then pass away. They wouldn’t even have to breed special kinds of pigs. They would just have to acquire their leftover organs from slaughterhouses and then run them through lab procedures like the ones Miromatrix scientists are currently experimenting with.

“That is something that in the long term may very likely contribute to the development of organs we can use in humans,” claimed Tevar.

Despite this, even Ross of Miromatrix has cautioned people of the potential dangers. Stripping away the pig cells remove some of the risks of xenotransplantation, but the risk of complications, like lurking animal viruses or hyper-rejection, does not fall to zero percent.

Furthermore, the process of getting human cells to take over bioengineered pig organs is complex. “We can’t take billions of cells and push them into the organs at once,” said Ross.

Learn more about other potentially dangerous medical experiments at

Watch this video from “The Constitutional County” discussing how hospitals all over America are killing transplant patients by forcing them to take experimental vaccines.

This video is from the channel The Constitutional County on

More related articles:

MEDICAL SCIENCE WARNING: Lung transplant recipients develop respiratory distress and organ rejection after second dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

Colorado woman previously denied transplant for being unvaccinated finally gets the medical care she needs.

Animal organ HARVESTING farms coming soon? Researchers develop method to “refurbish” harvested animal organs for human transplant.

Japanese ban on creating human organis in animals to be lifted; “transplant farms” to mass produce organs for disease-ridden humans?

Aborted baby organs to be used to grow transplants for medical patients.

Sources include:

Biden's lax immigration policy brings Yuma, Arizona to the brink of collapse

Image: Biden’s lax immigration policy brings Yuma, Arizona to the brink of collapse

(Natural News) President Joe Biden’s lax immigration policy and espousal of open borders is bringing the city of Yuma in Arizona to the brink of collapse.

Writing for the New American magazine, contributor David Kelly noted that the city of Yuma, which has a population of 100,000, sees thousands of illegal aliens crossing the nearby border every week. The U.S. Border Patrol for the sector has reportedly seen a 171 percent increase in illegal immigrants crossing the border between 2021 and 2022. Moreover, Yuma is on the No. 3 spot in illegal immigrant apprehensions, tailing the cities of El Paso and Del Rio in Texas.

Jonathan Lines, Yuma County supervisor, told Fox News in an interview: “Policies need to be changed when you see an unprecedented amount of people coming across the border that even supersedes what we saw under any of the other presidents for the past 30 years. [The illegals are] coming because they said that Biden told them to come, that we have an open border.”

Yuma farmer Hank Auza also expressed concerns about the illegal aliens possibly passing on foodborne pathogens on their crops. The seat of Arizona’s Yuma County produces 93 percent of America’s leafy greens during the winter months, and the amount of illegal aliens entering could undermine food safety.

Alex Muller, another Yuma farmer, shared Auza’s sentiments. “Our fields are monitored, audited and tested for different pathogens. You can’t have people walking through the field,” he emphasized.

Worse, Auza mentioned that many Yuma residents cannot get into the city’s only hospital. “People have a hard time getting into the hospital because it has been so full of [illegal aliens],” he recounted.


The county supervisor ultimately warned that things “will only get worse with Biden’s policies,” and called on the president to “reassess” his stance. (Related: Poll reveals majority of Arizonans want a BORDER WALL in the Grand Canyon State.)

Lawmakers who visited Yuma only see “sanitized” version of border crisis

Lines also exhorted officials of the Biden administration to visit Yuma in order to witness the specific challenges faced by the city. “I’ve invited them several times, and I would invite them again right now. Please come and see for yourself,” he said.

Members of Congress who recently visited Yuma did not see the truth about the border crisis, only the “sanitized version” of it. Earlier in January, a bipartisan delegation from Washington, D.C. led by Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) and John Cornyn (R-TX) visited the city. But Lines lamented that the senators saw little to understand the full extent of Yuma’s problem with illegal aliens.

“After the visit, border crossings had dropped to almost nothing amid tighter activity on the Mexican side,” the county supervisor said. “[Meanwhile,] discarded shoes, medicine bottles and other evidence of illegal crossings had been removed from along the U.S. side.”

“Everything’s been 100 percent sanitized here as well, even more so than they’ve ever done before. And we’re actually not even seeing people coming across the border right now.”

Lines also pointed out that unannounced delegations that visit Yuma, not the publicized ones such as that of Sinema and Cornyn, “always see the real border challenge.”

“It’s a lie. They’re misrepresenting what’s actually happening at the border. Every single time there’s a high-profile visit, this is par for the course so that people never get to see what it looks like.”

Kelly concluded his piece by arguing that “time and time again … Biden and his administration have no desire to secure the border. The border cities such as Yuma will have to continue to stand tall and do what they can to survive the border invasion, while Biden watches from afar willfully ignoring his sworn duty to protect our borders and sovereignty.”

Watch this Fox News report about Yuma Mayor Douglas Nicholls mulling an emergency declaration due to the surge of illegal aliens, which he later did.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on

More related stories:

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey plugs holes in border wall with shipping containers.

Video shows camouflaged illegal aliens easily crossing southern border wall to enter US.

State nullification: Arizona set to defy Biden regime amid ongoing “invasion” by illegal aliens.

4.9 Million illegal aliens blew past the US border in the 18 months since Biden was installed in office.

Governors in Arizona, Texas bypass corrupt Biden regime and request law enforcement help from other states to combat illegal immigration, drug trafficking.

Sources include:

Government watchdog: Over $60B lost to pandemic unemployment benefits fraud

Image: Government watchdog: Over $60B lost to pandemic unemployment benefits fraud

(Natural News) The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has stated in a report that more than $60 billion was lost to unemployment insurance fraud during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

According to the government watchdog’s report made public on Jan. 23, state workforce agencies proved $4.3 billion were fraudulently claimed. Moreover, at least $45 billion in transactions, while not confirmed, were flagged as potentially fraudulent. (Related: Government report reveals criminals stole BILLIONS from unemployment benefits during pandemic.)

It also noted findings from the Department of Labor (DOL) stating that about $878 billion in total unemployment benefits were paid out from April 2020 through September 2022. Regular unemployment insurance comprised $209 billion of that total, while about $669 billion in payouts under various pandemic unemployment programs comprised the remaining amount. Unemployment benefits formally ended on Sept. 6, 2021.

Since the figure is an estimate spread over the entire unemployment system, the GAO cautioned that the data should be “interpreted with caution.” The watchdog also questioned the DOL’s efforts to fight benefits fraud.

“The DOL has taken steps to address such fraud,” it pointed out. “However, the department has yet to develop an antifraud strategy based on leading practices from GAO’s Fraud Risk Framework as required by law. Without an antifraud strategy, DOL is not able to ensure that it is addressing the most significant fraud risks facing the unemployment insurance system.”


“Also, it has not yet addressed the six October 2021 recommendations GAO made including to identify, assess the impact of, and prioritize [unemployment insurance] fraud risks. These are essential pieces to inform an overall anti-fraud strategy.

Acting Assistant Labor Secretary Brent Parton responded by saying his department has the plan to ensure the integrity of the unemployment insurance program and is working to implement the GAO’s recommendations. He objected to the report’s instruction to complete those recommendations before it undertakes any new anti-fraud strategies.

“Instead of delaying antifraud efforts, the department is developing the UI fraud risk profile in tandem with ongoing anti-fraud efforts,” Parton stated.

House GOP to investigate unemployment benefits fraud

According to the GAO, the actual amount involved in the COVID-19 unemployment benefits fraud may even be “substantially higher.”

The House Oversight Committee chaired by Rep. James Comer (R-KY) wrote to the DOL and its inspector general’s office about fraudulent jobless benefits claims. Aside from the federal agency, state labor departments in California, New York and Pennsylvania also received letters from Comer.

According to the Republican congressman, the Biden administration has allowed fraud to run rampant in federal assistance programs and Democrats in Congress have conducted little oversight. He assured the public that this will change with the GOP controlling the House of Representatives.

“We owe it to Americans to identify how hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars spent under the guise of pandemic relief were lost to waste, fraud, abuse and mismanagement,” he said.

The GAO’s report came a week before a scheduled hearing by the House GOP over “the rampant waste of taxpayer dollars in COVID relief programs” on Feb. 1. The Labor Department said it received Comer’s letter about unemployment benefits fraud and is now reviewing it.

Watch Fox Business host and former National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow discuss the fraudulent spending of federal unemployment benefits.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on

More related stories:

New report found that criminals spent Wuhan virus unemployment benefits on drugs and weapons.

Initial unemployment claims remain high as recession fears affect labor market.

US unemployment claims rise to highest level in eight months.

Jobless claims surge to highest level in 6 months as employers cut jobs due to weakening economy.

Government lost as much as $100 billion to stimulus money fraud during COVID-19 pandemic.

Sources include:

Regional emergency declared in eight states due to gasoline, diesel and jet fuel shortages

Image: Regional emergency declared in eight states due to gasoline, diesel and jet fuel shortages

(Natural News) The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has declared a regional emergency in eight states due to a shortage of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel caused by the combination of low production and high demand.

The FMCSA’s regional emergency declaration affects Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and Wyoming. The agency, a component of the Department of Transportation responsible for regulating the trucking industry, made the declaration in response to the closure of a refinery in Colorado and the exceptionally severe winter weather that is causing demand for fuel to surge.

“This seems almost engineered,” commented political commentator Patrick Humphrey in a video posted on social media. “How is this happening? How does this keep happening in the most prosperous and the most energy-producing country in the entire world?” (Related: No trains, no planes, no automobiles and NO GAS – Welcome to the DE-CIVILIZATION Democrat utopia.)

On Dec. 24, the Suncor Refinery in Commerce City, Colorado, unexpectedly shut down due to “extreme and record-setting weather,” according to the company’s press release. Suncor claimed the refinery isn’t expected to resume full operations until late into the first quarter of 2023.

This factor, combined with the shutdown occurring in the middle of winter, has made in difficult to obtain the necessary gasoline, diesel and jet fuel in the affected states, according to the FMCSA’s emergency order.

“This declaration addresses the emergency conditions creating a need for immediate transportation of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel and provides necessary relief,” reads the emergency declaration.


Regional emergency declaration to provide aid to drivers and companies supporting relief efforts

The FMCSA’s emergency declaration temporarily lifts the maximum driving time of property-carrying vehicles as established by Part 395.3 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.

This waiver of the regulation only affects drivers providing direct assistance to the FMCSA’s emergency relief efforts, such as truckers hauling gasoline, diesel and jet fuel into the affected states

According to the FMCSA, any driver or motor carrier who wants to aid emergency relief efforts must also abide by certain conditions. First and foremost is the motor carrier or driver’s understanding that no other part of the Federal Motor Carrier Regulations are waived.

Another condition is an understanding that “direct assistance” to emergency relief efforts does not include the transportation of fuel supplies or other products “related to long-term rehabilitation of damaged physical infrastructure.”

Truckers that are carrying mixed loads that include the much-needed fuel supplies and commercial goods, or those providing services that are not in support of emergency relief efforts, are immediately no longer eligible for emergency benefits.

Furthermore, once truckers are sent by motor carriers to another location to begin commercial operations, their participation in the Part 395.3 waiver is immediately terminated. Other conditions include:

  • Motor carriers or drivers who are subject to out-of-service orders are not eligible for the benefits of the emergency declaration until the orders have been rescinded in writing by the issuing jurisdictions.
  • Drivers that move from aiding emergency relief efforts to normal commercial operations are required to take a 10-hour break when the total time they engaged in emergency relief efforts, or in a combination of emergency relief and normal commercial operations, equals or exceeds 14 hours.

The FMCSA’s declaration remains in effect until the end of the emergency or until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on Feb. 15, 2023, whichever comes first.

Learn more about the energy crisis in the United States and other parts of the world at

Watch this video of political commentator Patrick Humphrey discussing the FMCSA’s regional emergency declaration.

This video is from the Ezekiel34 channel on

More related stories:

UPRISING: Protests surged in Western Europe in 2022 due to food and fuel crises, report finds.

Solar and wind can’t replace fossil fuel, points out economist Peter Hartley.

Natural gas prices in Southern California SURGED 128% since December.

Josh Sigurdson: Biden admin’s plan to phase out oil use is ABSOLUTE INSANITY.

Feds prepare for energy and diesel shortages.

Sources include:

Propaganda and Censorship Dominate the Information War

  • Most of the international news coverage in Western media is provided by three global news agencies — The Associated Press (AP), Reuters and Agence France-Presse (AFP)

  • Until or unless at least one of these news agencies sends out a notice, national and local media are unlikely to report on an event. Even photos and videos are typically sourced directly from these global news agencies. This way, people hear, see and read the exact same message everywhere

  • Intelligence agencies and defense ministries are well aware of the power of these news agencies and use them with regularity. In 2009, then-president of the AP, Tom Curley, let it slip that the U.S. Pentagon has more than 27,000 PR specialists that spin up stories, and an annual propaganda budget of nearly $5 billion

  • The rest of the technocratic apparatus uses these news agencies in the same way and for the same reasons — to proliferate certain narratives while burying or “debunking” others

  • The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is partnered with a censorship consortium called the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP). Through this consortium, the DHS is illegally censoring Americans

Visit Mercola Market


Google promised to bring us the world, and for decades dished up tens of thousands of results to any given search. It was a clever trap. Get the world’s population hooked on an information monopoly, and then, when the time was ripe, funnel everyone toward specific narratives and hide everything else.

Google can do it because the primary way anyone “researches” a topic online is by using the Google search engine; Google controls well over 95% of the searches done on the internet across the entire planet. A similar trap was laid within the media landscape. As reported by Swiss Policy Research:

“… most of the international news coverage in Western media is provided by only three global news agencies based in New York, London and Paris. The key role played by these agencies means Western media often report on the same topics, even using the same wording.

In addition, governments, military and intelligence services use these global news agencies as multipliers to spread their messages around the world. A study of the Syria war coverage by nine leading European newspapers clearly illustrates these issues: 78% of all articles were based in whole or in part on agency reports, yet 0% on investigative research.

Moreover, 82% of all opinion pieces and interviews were in favor of a US and NATO intervention, while propaganda was attributed exclusively to the opposite side.”

Propaganda on the one hand, and censorship on the other, are the primary battle strategies of the information war we now find ourselves steeped in. It’s imperative, then, to understand how these “weapons of war” against the public are being used, and by whom.

When it comes to the actual dissemination of fake news and propaganda, international news agencies play a central role and, as mentioned, there’s only three of them:

  1. The Associated Press (AP) — Headquartered in the U.S., with more than 4,000 employees worldwide, AP is relied upon by approximately 12,000 international media outlets and reaches more than half of the world’s population each day.

  2. Thomson Reuters — Reuters was originally headquartered in London, U.K., but was acquired by the Thomson Corporation in 2008. The two media companies merged and become the Thomson Reuters Corp., which employs more than 25,000 people in hundreds of locations worldwide.

  3. Agence France-Presse (AFP) — A quasi-governmental organization based in Paris, France, with about 4,000 employees, according to Swiss Policy Research,

    the AFP sends out more than 3,000 stories and photos each day to media companies around the world.

As once noted by Wolfgang Vyslozil, former managing director of Austria Presse Agentur (APA, Austria’s national press agency):

“News agencies are rarely in the public eye. Yet they are one of the most influential and at the same time one of the least known media types. They are key institutions of substantial importance to any media system. They are the invisible nerve center that connects all parts of this system.”

Indeed, until or unless at least one of these news agencies sends out a notice, national and local media are unlikely to report on an event. Even photos and videos are typically sourced directly from these global news agencies. This way, people hear, see and read the exact same message everywhere.

Even media outlets that have foreign correspondents on their payroll do not expect those correspondents to conduct independent investigations. They too simply report whatever the Big Three news agencies want covered, and from the angle they want it covered.

What you end up with is a sort of echo chamber where only one view is presented. As one might expect, this setup makes for a perfect propaganda machine. As noted by Swiss Policy Research:

“Due to the rather low journalistic performance of the mainstream media and their high dependence on a few news agencies, it is easy for interested parties to spread propaganda and disinformation in a supposedly respectable format to a worldwide audience.”

Intelligence agencies and defense ministries are well aware of the power of these news agencies and use them with regularity. In 2009, then-president of the AP, Tom Curley, let it slip that the U.S. Pentagon has more than 27,000 PR specialists that spin up stories, and an annual propaganda budget of nearly $5 billion.

“The technocratic apparatus uses these news agencies to proliferate certain narratives while burying or ‘debunking’ others.”

Curley also stated that high-ranking U.S. generals had threatened to “ruin” him and the agency should AP journalists decide to take a critical stance against the U.S. military.

The rest of the technocratic apparatus also uses these news agencies in the same way and for the same reasons — to proliferate certain narratives while burying or “debunking” others. Of course, we now also know that at least some of the world’s defense ministries are working on the Deep State’s behalf, so there’s not much separating them. Their narratives fit together like puzzle pieces. 

In short, the current censoring and labeling of anything that threatens the globalist agenda as “misinformation” and “disinformation” is a top-down scheme, as illustrated

above. It’s not random, by any means, and it’s not driven by the opinions of private companies themselves. Social media companies, for example, are mere tools for the technocratic deep state, which operates worldwide.

That said, many of the key media personalities are also part of the globalist network.

Just look at the membership rosters of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission, just to name a few.

You’ll find many prominent journalists, editors and publishers. As insiders, they don’t have to be told what to report. They already know what the agenda is, and the narrative that will further that agenda.

The reason most people have no idea that their local or favored news media are simply regurgitating the same story as everyone else is because, except for print newspapers, where you’ll notice a tiny acronym in parentheses in the dateline, media rarely name their sources. If they did, you’d quickly notice the pattern.

At that point, you’d realize that few if any news reports have actually been independently researched, and this, of course, is a perception they don’t want you to have.

You can find these sources if you know where to look, but they’re still too cryptic to interpret for most. As mentioned, the news agency that circulated the story and occasionally the agency editor that edited the report are typically listed at the top or bottom of the article in abbreviated form, within parentheses.

Media specialists are usually the only ones who know how to decipher these references, but if you know the abbreviation of three international agencies — AP, Reuters and AFP — you will at least know that a news agency created the story.

Sometimes media companies will use an agency’s story without attribution, however, and/or they may simply rewrite it slightly to make it appear like an independent contribution. Still, the vast majority of news stories — including accompanying photos and videos — are sourced from the Big Three.

“In the end, this dependency on the global agencies creates a striking similarity in international reporting: from Vienna to Washington, our media often report the same topics, using many of the same phrases — a phenomenon that would otherwise rather be associated with ‘controlled media’ in authoritarian states,” Swiss Policy Research writes, adding:

“Dependence on global agencies is also a major reason why media coverage of geopolitical conflicts is often superficial and erratic, while historic relationships and background are fragmented or altogether absent …

Finally, the dominance of global agencies explains why certain geopolitical issues and events … are not mentioned in our media at all: if the agencies do not report on something, then most Western media will not be aware of it.

As pointed out on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the German DPA [the German national press agency]: ‘What the agency does not report, does not take place …

While some topics do not appear at all in our media, other topics are very prominent — even though they shouldn’t actually be: ‘Often the mass media do not report on reality, but on a constructed or staged reality. Several studies have shown that the mass media are predominantly determined by PR activities …'”

In mid-November 2020, then-President Donald Trump fired Chris Krebs, director of the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), after Krebs declared the 2020 election “the most secure election in U.S. history.”

Incidentally, Krebs is a former Microsoft executive, which puts him inside the sphere of the globalist cabal. Krebs also oversaw CISA’s change of focus, from one focused on countering foreign disinformation campaigns to domestic censorship. This clearly demonstrates which team he’s on, and it’s not Team Humanity.

In 2020, Krebs even launched a “rumor control” website

to debunk claims of voter fraud — including claims by the sitting president himself. CISA still maintains that site, ostensibly to counter any false claims of voter fraud that might arise in future elections.

There are clear problems with this. If there are claims of fraud, both sides need to be allowed to be heard and present their evidence. You can’t just have one side saying “there’s nothing to see here, move along.” Yet CISA is acting as a de facto censorship bureau, using 120 analysts to censor millions of social media posts — not only on elections but also on COVID-19.

Elon Musk recently called CISA out as a “propaganda platform,”

and he’s correct. We now know that CISA is partnered with a censorship consortium called the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP). The EIP, in turn, is made up of four organizations:

  1. The Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO)

  2. The University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public

  3. The Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab

  4. Graphika (a social media analytics company)

During the 2020 election cycle, the EIP and CISA worked with the State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC) and the DHS-backed Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC) to police wrongthink on social media. As reported by Kanekoa News on Substack:

“The EIP built communication portals with Big Tech platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, Google, TikTok, Reddit, and Discord; and liberal groups NAACP, Common Cause, the Democratic National Committee, and Harvard’s Defending Digital Democracy Project, cofounded by former Hillary Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook, throughout the 2020 and 2022 election cycles, to censor domestic ‘mis- and disinformation.’

They had about 120 analysts monitoring social media for 20 hours a day, forwarding tickets of misinformation to be censored, and this censorship pivoted to COVID vaccines when they started the Virality Project in Feb. 2021.

A report

from the Foundation for Freedom Online (FFO), a non-profit founded by Mike Benz, entitled ‘DHS Censorship Agency Had Strange First Mission: Banning Speech That Casts Doubt On ‘Red Mirage, Blue Shift’ Election Events’ details this government speech control machine and its ability to control the narrative during the 2020 election …”

Based on the Foundation of Freedom Online’s investigation, the DHS and its partners targeted dozens of “misinformation narratives,” all of which were suppressed. They labeled 22 million tweets as “misinformation,” along with hundreds of millions of Facebook posts, YouTube videos and TikToks.

DHS partners also bragged about their ability to get tech companies to change their terms of service to facilitate or allow for this otherwise illegal censoring. As noted by Kanekoa News:

“In short, CISA outsourced censorship to a web of like-minded private sector and civil society partners to circumvent unclear legal authorities and violations of the First Amendment.”

Not surprisingly, “Every single ‘repeat spreader of election misinformation’ … was aligned with the political right,” Kanekoa News writes, adding:

“Krebs and the EIP’s decision to completely censor the narrative around voting machine vulnerabilities fails to acknowledge that congressional members aligned with the left, including Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Sen. Ron Wyden, and Sen. Kamala Harris, among numerous computer science professors and election security experts, spent the last four years warning the American people that computerized voting systems are often connected to the internet, compromised, and vulnerable to hackers.

In effect, the left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election and the right was censored for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election.”

Equally hypocritical, many of the individuals in the EIP had promoted the idea that Donald Trump was an illegitimate president because of the accusations raised in the Russiagate “scandal” — all of which later turned out to be intentionally fabricated lies, approved and paid for by Hillary Clinton.

Yet, despite delegitimizing the 2016 election and having been proven wrong, those same people then went on to censor anyone who dared “delegitimize” the 2020 election by asking questions and pointing to evidence of foul play.

One player in particular, Renée DiResta, a technical research manager at Stanford Internet Observatory, epitomizes the EIP’s hypocrisy. As explained by the Foundation for Freedom Online:

“The prominent role Renée DiResta plays in EIP … is particularly worrisome and disturbing. Before DiResta became research manager at the Stanford disinfo lab, she was research director for a now-notorious, scandal-laden and disgraced political hatchet firm known as New Knowledge LLC.

In December 2018, the New York Times exposed that DiResta’s Democrat donor-funded small cybersecurity firm, New Knowledge, had clandestinely created thousands of fake ‘Russian bots’ (user accounts generated with a virtual private network (VPN) to simulate a Russian IP address) on Twitter and Facebook then mass subscribed those fake ‘Russian bots’ to opposition Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore’s campaign.

DiResta did this — or at least the small firm where she was a director did this — in the heat of the Nov. 2017 Alabama special election, which substantially decided the party control of the US Senate. It was a race in which Moore narrowly lost, and for whose loss New Knowledge – in its own report — took credit.

At the time, mainstream news genuinely thought Roy Moore was being backed by Russians. But it was just DiResta’s professional disinformation firm interfering in the election.”

A key take-home here is that a great deal of the propaganda war involves people and organizations that say they’re one thing but do the complete opposite. For example, DiResta is the head of policy for Data for Democracy,

while at the same time taking part in a plot to directly circumvent the democratic election process.

This shockingly deceitful behavior becomes easier to understand once you know she’s also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the mission of which is to bring about a totalitarian one world government, a New World Order with global top-down rule. How do we know this? Simple, they’ve admitted it.

In 1950, the son of one of the CFR’s founders, James Warburg, said to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it — by conquest or consent.”

Similarly, in 1975 CFR insider Admiral Chester Ward wrote that the goal of the CFR was “submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.”

According to Ward, the desire to “surrender the sovereignty and independence of the United States is pervasive throughout most of its membership,” and “In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as ‘America First.'” So, DiResta is working on behalf of those who seek to establish a one-world government, and they’re not known for their scruples, or for following democratic processes.

As explained by Foundation for Freedom Online founder Mike Benz:

“DHS insiders’ collective justification, without uttering a peep about the switch’s revolutionary implications, was that ‘domestic disinformation’ was now a greater ‘cyber threat to elections’ than falsehoods flowing from foreign interference.

So CISA’s self-invented censorship powers against ‘foreign disinformation’ went from being pointed outward against supposed Russian bot accounts to being pointed inwards at tens of millions of US citizens simply talking lawfully about their elections.”

If propaganda is already deeply entrenched in our media structure, and government agencies are engaged in censoring, how do we know what is true and what is not?

There’s no easy answer to this question, but the solution involves first becoming aware of the fact that mainstream media consistently lie to support the cabal’s agenda. There is a reason for why the media narrative is what it is. One way to evaluate the news is to ask yourself, “Why might they want me to think of this in this particular way?” Eventually, patterns begin to form.

Ultimately, to find the truth, you must be willing to look hard for it, and to look in places outside the mainstream media consortium. You will rarely ever find the answer on Google, or even the new Open AI Chatbot. You have to ask questions and reason your way through the information you find. If something doesn’t make sense yet you’re told to accept it without question, it’s probably propaganda.

Any number of COVID-19 restrictions, for example, have been illogical in the extreme, which tells us they’re not about protecting people from infection. It’s about something else, and that something else has often been the purposeful destruction of small businesses to facilitate wealth transfer from the middle and lower class to the top echelon. Ultimately, that is the plan, and to stop it, we have to stop believing the propaganda. It’s just that simple. And that challenging.

Subscribe to Mercola Newsletter

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.