(Natural News) The most pressing issue of the day is “the ethical and medical urgency of the climate crisis,” according toThe Lancet.
The once-respected medical journal, which is based out of the United Kingdom, has declared global warming to be the “biggest global health threat of the 21st century.” Its editorial board is also celebrating “health-care professionals participating in Extinction Rebellion action [who] blocked the entrance to the U.K.’s Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to protest about impotent responses to climate change.”
Health care, The Lancet said, is “part of the climate problem” because “the global health-care industry emitted two gigatons of carbon dioxide (CO2), or 4.4 percent of the world’s total” in 2014. This, we are told, demands immediate action in the form of aggressive climate activism within the medical community.
This is the same The Lancet that recently proclaimed “medical racism” in the United States to be another pressing issue that can only be solved by dismantling the “structural violence” that allegedly persists across the nation. (Related: Remember at the height of the COVID scamdemic when The Lancet published, then retracted, a fake science study claiming hydroxychloroquine [HCQ] causes heart disease?)
Pharmaceuticals are made from “fossil fuels,” which means they also need to go
Concerning climate change, The Lancet pointed to operating rooms “overflowing with trash generated by disposable sterile supplies and surgical equipment,” as well as “parking areas filled with private transportation reliant on fossil fuels, and constant energy flow to digital monitors and other technologies.”
Interestingly, the journal also identified pharmaceuticals as a climate issue as well since most of them are made from so-called “fossil fuels,” which are really just God-given earth fuels that exist in abundance beneath the surface of the planet.
What The Lancet is concerned about is not so much these fuels themselves but the “carbon” they produce. The climate cult, as you probably know, is obsessed with carbon and believes it to be something “evil,” even though all life is made from carbon.
One way The Lancet suggests to combat all this carbon is for doctors to stop participating in free drug samples programs, which will “help reduce medication overuse and reduce the carbon impact when samples go unused.”
Another idea presented by The Lancet is for doctors to stop starting patients on 30-day drug courses and instead try a one-week supply approach, “even at the cost of some convenience to the doctor and patient.”
It sounds silly – and it is – but this is what has become of the journal, which in days of old was widely considered to be the gold standard of medical science. The Lancet has clearly been infiltrated and taken over by climate lunatics, just like governments, academia and even Wall Street have.
Hilariously, The Lancet also wants doctors to start engaging in a “green informed consent” program that “incorporates education about the climate impact of pharmaceuticals and climate change health hazards.”
Patients are to be indoctrinated with climate propaganda every time they see their doctor or get a prescription, in other words. This will give patients the ability to “choose to decline a medication, or they might choose to accept the medication and pursue carbon offsets.”
All in all, The Lancet wants doctors everywhere to become “climate activists in their daily clinical practice” – yes, this is a direct quote from the journal.
“Health care professionals have an important part to play in reducing the carbon emissions of health care by dispensing only needed medications and by helping to ensure that those are used to their fullest potential,” the journal said.
(Natural News) In order to continue peddling an endless stream of new high-profit “vaccines” on the public, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is engaging in “directed evolution” projects designed to “mutate” the virus on purpose.
Project Veritas learned all this in another undercover bombshell interview, this time with Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer’s Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations, and mRNA Scientific Planner. Walker revealed that Pfizer is intentionally trying to spread new “variants” and “subvariants” of covid in order to create and sell new injections.
“One of the things we’re exploring is, like, why don’t we just mutate it [covid] ourselves so we could create – preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re going to do that though, there’s a risk of, like, as you could imagine – no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses.”
Walker urged the interviewer: “don’t tell anyone, promise you won’t tell anyone.” He then proceeded to reveal how Pfizer is going about trying to mutate covid using primates. (Related: In 2021, Project Veritas blew the lid on Facebook’s global censorship of “vaccine hesitancy”.)
“The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [covid] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere,” he added. “Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bulls**t.”
Be sure to watch the full undercover video interview below:
Pfizer is mutating covid on purpose, but “that is not what we say to the public,” Walker admits
Right off the bat in the interview when asked if Pfizer “is thinking about mutating covid,” Walker admitted that while this “is not what we say to the public,” it is exactly what Pfizer is doing to keep the vaccine cash flowing.
The interviewer then responded to say that what Walker described sounds a whole lot like gain-of-function research, which is illegal. Walker immediately responded with “no, no, no, no,” and proceeded to instead describe the process as “directed evolution.”
“You do things like selected directional mutations to try to see if you can make it more potent,” Walker revealed. “So there is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that’s going work.”
“There’s a revolving door for all government officials,” Walker further stated. “It’s pretty good for the industry, to be honest.”
In other words, many of the people working at regulatory bodies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) either previously worked at, or will soon work at, a drug company like Pfizer to grease the skids for all the new drugs coming down the pipeline.
“It’s bad for everyone else in America … because if the regulators who have to approve our drugs, you know, that once they stop being a regulator, they want to come work for the company, they’re not going to be as harsh on the company,” is how Walker explained it.
Pfizer using “selected directional mutations” to make new covid strains that are more “potent”
The undercover Project Veritas reporter really pressed Walker about the “directed evolution” protocols, which sound a whole lot like gain-of-function research. Walker initially denied that these are the same, but later in the conversation admitted that Pfizer is, in fact, employing a type of gain-of-function research that is slightly different than the one employed in Wuhan to create the original covid strain.
“Well, you’re not supposed to do gain of function research with the viruses,” Walker responded to the reporter’s questions about the differentiation. “They recommend not. But you do things like selected directional mutations to try to see if you can make it more potent.”
“They’re still kind of conducting the experiments on it, but it seems like from what I’ve heard they’re kind of optimizing it. But they’re going slow, because everyone’s very cautious. They obviously don’t want to accelerate too much. But I think they’re also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you’re trying to figure out future mutation.”
Pfizer’s use of the term “directed evolution” rather than gain-of-function apparently lets the company off the hook for this kind of research, which would otherwise be illegal – and probably still is.
Walker explained that by tampering with covid in this manner, Pfizer can predict, so to speak, which new variants and subvariants will emerge next and have an ongoing stream of new vaccines at the ready for rapid distribution.
“So part of what they want to do is to some extent try to figure out if, like, you know how there’s all these new strains and variants that just pop up?” Walker explained. “Why don’t we try to catch them before they pop up in nature and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically for new variants.”
“So that’s why they’re thinking if you control it in a lab, then you say ‘Oh, this is a new epitope.’ And so then if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine kind of working on it.”
Pfizer doesn’t always get it right, Walker admitted, but “either way it’s going to be a cash cow.”
“Covid will probably be a cash cow for us for a while going forward which I obviously like,” Walker said with a grin.
All government positions are “a revolving door,” Walker says
But wait: is this not all illegal? It would be if the entire government wasn’t a revolving door with industry. According to Walker, all government positions are a revolving door with industry.
“So in the pharma industry, all the government officials who review our drugs, mostly they come work for pharma companies,” he explained. “Like in the military, all the army and defense government officials eventually go work for the defense companies afterwards.”
The latest news about the pharmaceutical industry can be found at Corruption.news.
(Natural News) The latest bombshell revelations unearthed by Project Veritas about Pfizer and its secret covid-mutating “vaccine” scam are making waves across the independent media. And we have more truths to share with you about it, including the link between Pfizer’s Jordon Trishton Walker and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a corporate infiltrator that appears to have colluded with the United States government to unleash covid injections before the so-called “pandemic” even arrived.
Brian O’Shea on his Substack wrote that Walker appears to be “on loan” from BCG to Pfizer, where he helped develop market forecasts for oncology-related therapeutics in 2021. Walker also conducted an “impact evaluation of value-based payment models and covid-related changes in hospital reimbursement policies for a U.S. federal health agency.”
“Does this mean Boston Consulting Group or Pfizer or both were working with the U.S. government to actually create POLICIES THAT AFFECT U.S. TAXPAYERS?” O’Shea asks.
Before covid hit America’s shores, Walker was also busy learning Mandarin (Chinese) in a BCG-sponsored language and business immersion program – which is highly suspicious based on its timing.
“Does this mean BCG and / or their Clients (who are either Pfizer, the U.S. Government, or both) knew that these vaccines would be (or were already) being made in China?” O’Shea speculates.
“Business immersion (I am guessing business terms and colloquialisms) was also a focus. Does this mean he and his Clients knew in 2019 or earlier that a mass vaccination / pharma boom was about to hit that both the CCP (who control the Chinese pharma industry and, of course, all of the BSL-4 labs the research occurred in) & Pfizer et al would be partnered on?”
(Related: Check out our bombshell report on Walker’s admissions to the Project Veritas undercover reporter.)
Who really is “Jordon Trishton Walker?”
There is no denying that Walker’s role at Pfizer involves marketing, which is his specialty. It appears as though Walker was brought in to join Pfizer’s “Vaccine Confidence” team, the job of which is to strategize ways to manipulate the American public into getting repeatedly “vaccinated” for covid.
Some of Walker’s background, at least what is stated publicly on various websites that show his credentials, is also questionable. One of them claims he attended Yale University – but this is the only site that does.
During his time at BCG, which dovetails with his entrance into the Pfizer fold in May 2021, Walker “developed a five-year growth strategy for a large biopharma.” What, exactly, is the identity of this “biopharma,” we wonder?
Walker’s hiring at Pfizer is also listed on various “people search” pages as being a “signal hire.” What is the context of this, we wonder?
Even stranger is the fact that ever since Project Veritas released its bombshell undercover video exposing Walker and Pfizer, his LinkedIn page has vanished. O’Shea called on his followers and readers to send him “an archived page if you have one.”
Walker also seems to use a variety of aliases, which is strange for someone who is supposed to be a credible professional.
“I’ve never met a legitimate doctor with so many different name combos,” wrote a commenter about this little factoid.
Another anomaly is that in some instances Walker is referenced as being a “doctor” while in others he is not. Why is it unclear, based on this, whether the guy is really a doctor?
“The timing of his various academic and professional positions doesn’t add up,” this same commenter added. “There is absolutely nothing about this guy before 2019 that says top pharma exec in charge or worldwide operations. Highly, highly suspicious.”
More of the latest news about the Pfizer scandal can be found at Corruption.news.
A shadowy Army unit secretly spied on British citizens who criticised the Government’s Covid lockdown policies, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
Military operatives in the UK’s ‘information warfare’ brigade were part of a sinister operation that targeted politicians and high-profile journalists who raised doubts about the official pandemic response.
They compiled dossiers on public figures such as ex-Minister David Davis, who questioned the modelling behind alarming death toll predictions, as well as journalists such as Peter Hitchens and Toby Young. Their dissenting views were then reported back to No 10.
The famous Pentagon and US government-linked think tank RAND Corporation has finally attempted to inject some rare realism into the Washington establishment’s thinking and planning regarding the Ukraine war. So far throughout eleven months of conflict which remains largely stalemated, though the last few days have seen Russian military momentum and advance grow in the Bakhmut offensive, US and NATO officials have unhesitatingly and enthusiastically cheered on every major escalation of the West’s involvement.
But the new 32-page RAND document has sounded the alarm over the dangers of this approach, which is unusual given the think tank is notorious for being the hawkish academic arm of the military-industrial complex. This was especially the case in the Vietnam war era, when RAND became infamous for its fueling the policy behind various insurgency and counterinsurgency fiascos in Vietnam, Laos, and Thailand.
RAND now argues that in Ukraine “US interests would be best served by avoiding a protracted conflict,” and that “costs and risks of a long war…outweigh the possible benefits.”
