The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) ignores allegations of vaccine injury in pregnancy

Miscarriage and baby loss: What to say to women who are grieving | CNN

Pierre Kory wrote an article, Massive Miscarriage Rates Among Vaccinated Pregnant Women Found Buried In The Pfizer Documents on August 20, 2022. He wrote: “So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate.”

In the comments to Kory’s article, James Thorp mentioned he wrote a letter to the Executive Director of American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG).

It’s now 6 months later, and we now know the response from the mainstream medical community including ABOG: silence.

This is Kory’s article: Massive Miscarriage Rates Among Vaccinated Pregnant Women Found Buried In The Pfizer Documents.

The key paragraph:

So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate.

As far as I know, Pfizer has never provided updated information as far as I know.

That would be very troubling to people if they knew that.

Fortunately, the mainstream media makes sure that the issue is never talked about.

In response to the Kory Substack, James Thorp mentioned he wrote to the Executive Director of American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG).

You can see Thorp’s letter here.

It is now six months later and Dr. Thorp has still not heard a response to his letter.

In short, ABOG’s approach has been to ignore the issue entirely.

That’s how science works. When people disagree with you, you now ignore them.

In Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons, Tom Shimabukuro and other CDC authors used data from VAERS and v-safe to estimate pregnancy complications. They concluded that “Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.”

But they later admitted to a very serious error in this response. They admitted that they should NOT have used a denominator of 827 because 700 received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester. Here is what they wrote:

We agree that the denominator used in that proportion — 827 completed pregnancies — is not an appropriate denominator for the calculation of a risk estimate or rate.

So this part, which is still in their original (now corrected) paper, is misleading:


So when you take out the 700 from the denominator, you get 104/127=81.8% which is now sounding a lot like Kory’s number from the Pfizer documents, isn’t it?


In Receipt of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion, the CDC submitted a new estimate for the rate of spontaneous abortion which they claimed was 12.8% (age-standardized), and in the worst case, no more than 18.5% on an age-standardized basis:

In the sensitivity analysis, under the extreme assumption that all 65 participants with most recent contact during the first trimester had a spontaneous abortion, the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion from 6 to less than 20 weeks of gestation was 18.8% (95% CI, 16.6 to 20.9); after age standardization, the cumulative risk was 18.5% (95% CI, 16.1 to 20.8).

So their new best estimate was 12.8% which to me is remarkable since they admit they used the wrong denominator in their original study (827 vs. 127), yet are now able to get the same result (12.6% in the paper and 12.8% in their new analysis).

I found this article confusing and apparently I’m not alone.

The Shimabukuro study was written very poorly – likely on purpose – to obfuscate danger signals in their data. This is exactly why inexperienced, naïve, and unsuspecting clinicians have such difficulty interpreting this study. While the duration of pregnancy is 40 weeks, this study only investigated a 10-week window (December 14, 2020 to February 28, 2021). Why? What was their rush? What could possibly be the justification for this inappropriate scientific method? Where is the follow-up? To this very day the authors refuse to provide it and their “erratum” later in 2021 was completely unhelpful and largely missed by the public and even the academicians. Good enough right? How could it possibly be flawed and manipulated as it was published in the NEJM.  

Why is the follow-up data still missing? This is absurd. This small “window” of time is arbitrary and allows the authors the ability to manipulate data quite easily on both sides of this short window – a data manipulation not unexpected given the shenanigans described below. It appears that there was a “rush job” on publishing this manipulated data and stamping the “NEJM seal of excellence” with the sole purpose of browbeating obstetricians and eliminating vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women. There was zero safety data for this experimental gene product in pregnancy, NADA. The role out of this dangerous inflammatory product in pregnancy was a fait accompli, exactly as it was in children.

Inflammation in pregnancy has been known to be dangerous in pregnancy for decades.[1]  Inflammatory mediators resulting from inflammation are known to be dangerous in pregnancies often leading to adverse outcomes, such as miscarriage, preterm labor, intrauterine fetal growth restriction, and fetal demise.[2]  As one of the most inflammatory medical products ever rolled out, the experimental gene product predictably would have had adverse effects pregnancy. Preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes are known to be associated with inflammation in the maternal and fetoplacental unit.[3] Pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction are also known to be associated with inflammation [4] and so too are fetal malformations. [5]

Of the 21 authors in the Shimabukuro article, all of them had conflicts of interest as they were Federal Employees. Shimabukuro was the head of the COVID-19 vaccine safety update by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). [5] This represents a major conflict of interest. This constitutes a gross and flagrant violation of ethical standards and should have never been allowed. This reeks of “regulatory capture” as recently boasted by the Pfizer research executive revealed by Project Veritas.

The rollout of this experimental gene therapy in pregnancy was not only a fait accompli exactly as it was in children – but so too were the unethical “gag orders” emanating from licensure and certification boards including American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (, American College of ObGyn ( and the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine ([8] Physicians were instilled with great fear of the loss of their financial standing and medical licensures/certifications, especially when laden with burdensome medical school debt. Simultaneous gag orders from many regulatory/licensing agencies of both physicians and nurses all occurred in September, 2021.

The Pfizer and Moderna injections constitute an effective “internal control” as they were both deemed “safe, effective and necessary” in pregnancy. Yet, Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” (100 ug mRNA) compared with Pfizer (30 ug mRNA) carries a substantially greater risk of miscarriage. Why is that if both are “safe, effective and necessary in pregnancy)? The fact is that it is clear that the higher the dose of mRNA in the product the greater is the risk of miscarriage. In fact the miscarriage signal for Moderna is so high that by the time only 25% of this cohort of women had been recruited, there was a statistically significant increase with the Modernal product. [9]


1) Romero R, Gotsch F, Pineles B, Kusanovic JP. Inflammation in Pregnancy: Its Roles in Reproductive Physiology, Obstetrical Complications, and Fetal Injury. Nutrition
Reviews December 2007:65(3):S194-S202.

2) Kalagiri RR, Carder T, Choudhury S, Vora N, Ballard AR, Govande V, Drever N, Beeram MR, Uddin MN. Inflammation in Complicated Pregnancy and Its Outcome. Am J Perinatol. 2016 Dec;33(14):1337-1356. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1582397. Epub 2016 May 9. PMID: 27159203.

3) Gilman-Sachs A, Dambaeva S, GarciaMDS, Hussein Y, Kwak-Kim J, Beaman K. Inflammation induced preterm labor and birth. Journal of Reproductive Immunology 129:53-58.

4)  Cotechini T, Graham CH. Aberrant maternal inflammation as a cause of pregnancy complications: A potential therapeutic target? Placenta. 2015 Aug;36(8):960-6. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 4. PMID: 26094029.

5) Saleh N, Levine B. Five Infections That Cause Birth Defects.

6) COVID-19 vaccine safety update. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) January 27, 2021.

7) Naert MN, Khadraoui H, Muniz Rodriguez A, Fox NS. Stratified risk of pregnancy loss for women with a viable singleton pregnancy in the first trimester. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(23):4491-4495. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1852212. Epub 2020 Nov 22. PMID: 33225797.

8) Thorp JA, Renz T, Northrup C, Lively C, Breggin P, Bartlett R, et al. Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship. G Med Sci. 2022; 3(1): 046- 069.

9) Syed AK. The Arkmedic’s blog. BREAKING: Igor just blew the lid off the V-safe pregnancy registry.

Stratified risk of pregnancy loss for women with a viable singleton pregnancy in the first trimester:

Conclusion: In first trimester singleton pregnancies, the overall risk of pregnancy loss <20 weeks after confirmation of fetal heart activity is 5.4%.

Of course 5.4% and 12.8% are quite different.

Could it be that the larger issue is either the inability to get pregnant or pregnancy loss very early in pregnancy? Or both? Where are the stats on that?

If you are confused by all the rhetoric, there is a bottom line: the steep birth rate declines that are happening in countries around the world. [I’m hoping someone in the comments will supply a good article on this…I haven’t had time to find the best article on this]

Compounding the problem is the inability for the fact checkers to ascertain a reason for this coincidence happening: they simply cite “hand-waving” arguments which are supported by no evidentiary basis whatsoever! In short, they say, “such a dramatic drop could instead be caused by .

Read the fact check and decide for yourself who to believe. Note how the fact checker is so easily swayed by the alternative arguments without bothering to ask for the evidentiary support to prove that it wasn’t the vaccine and it was the alternate explanation. And the experts seem not to agree on what the “other” explanation is!

And finally, if you are still confused, note that the CDC and ACOG will not engage on these issues with prominent experts in the field. That alone pretty much tells you all you need to know, doesn’t it?

It is unfortunate that we are not allowed to have a discussion between either ABOG or CDC and doctors such as James Thorp to resolve these important issues.

But this is just the way science works today. When you are in a position of power, you are supposed to ignore anyone who disagrees with you and keep the data under wraps so nobody can see it.

Can we have any transparency at all? If someone qualified would like to debate James Thorp on this issue 1:1 to help surface the data to resolve the issues, please use the Contact Me link and check “Debate Thorp.

To me, the issue is simple: the shots kill more people than they save. They shouldn’t be used by anyone, of any age, regardless of comorbidities, even if there were no better alternatives. So we don’t even have to look at the pregnancy data to know that they should NEVER be used by women who are pregnant. If they are unsafe for everyone else, they are most certainly unsafe for pregnant women.


Over 60 scientists call for an end to covid-19 “vaccines” after documenting foreign toxins that damage the blood and impede circulation

Image: Over 60 scientists call for an end to covid-19 “vaccines” after documenting foreign toxins that damage the blood and impede circulation

(Natural News) The German Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis – which includes over 60 scientists, doctors, lawyers, and journalists – published their “Summary of Preliminary Findings” on the toxic substances they are finding in covid-19 vaccine samples and the changes they are seeing in the blood samples taken from vaccinated individuals.

The scientists “frequently observed an unusually rapid disintegration of the different types of cells in the vaccinated blood” and found concerning rouleaux formations of red blood cells specifically in the vaccinated samples.

Because of these issues, the Working Group is calling for all covid-19 vaccine programs to end. “In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the Covid-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately,” the Group’s report stated. The report has been sent to all members of the Lower House of Parliament in Germany and is being investigated by scientists and doctors of various disciplines.

Covid-19 vaccines damage the blood, impede circulation

The foreign, complex structures that have been isolated in the vaccine lots have also been found in the blood of vaccinated individuals. The Working Group used artificial intelligence to examine, with precision, differences in the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. These toxic substances are having a profound negative impact on the blood of vaccinated individuals, as seen under dark-field microscopy. These inflammatory changes to the blood are taking place regardless of the incidence and severity of the side effects that vaccinated individuals experience. The covid-19 vaccines can cause long term changes in blood composition, without the vaccinated person being aware of these changes.


The scientists wrote that the foreign objects are not the result of contamination because they are found in different blood samples from various vaccine lots. They warn that the size of the objects can “lead to disruption in the blood circulation in the vessels.”

Much of the damage is predicated on the stability of the envelope of the lipid nanoparticles. The lipid nano-particles are designed to evade detection and deliver mRNA instructions to the cells. When the nanoparticles remain stable and effectively do their job, the blood damage is more severe and the vaccine side effects are more frequent and pronounced.

The researchers warn:

The stability of the lipid nano-particle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, toxic.

The vaccine’s mRNA is encapsulated in a protective envelope of nano lipids. These nano lipids are made out of multiple layers of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Some people have antibodies to PEG, due to previous exposure to vaccines and pharmaceuticals that contain PEG. This may explain the different reactions to the vaccine. If a person’s immune system recognizes, attacks, and breaks down the PEG, then the mRNA will degrade and not make it to the ribosomes of the cells. If this happens, then the vaccine does not produce the spike proteins, does not cause a further immune response, and does not cause subsequent damage.

Microscopic analysis finds various metallic elements in covid-19 vaccines

Researchers used scanning electron microscopy (“SEM”) and corresponding energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (“EDX”) to investigate the different vials of covid-19 vaccines. The analysis found metallic elements in the Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines. These metallic elements included caesium, potassium, calcium, barium, cobalt, iron, chromium, titanium, cerium, gadolinium, aluminum, silicon, and sulfur. These elements were not found in the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Lubecavax, and Influspit Tetra vaccines.

The group hypothesized why the caesium was used in the vaccine. “From a medical point of view, caesium has no therapeutic value; on the contrary, one would have to assume that the addition of caesium disturbs the potassium balance and could cause vital cells (e.g., defense cells) to die in order to possibly accelerate the effect of the vaccination or to avoid endangering that effect.”

The Moderna vaccine also contained antimony, a highly toxic metal that could be used as an antiprotozoal adjuvant, serving an immunosuppressive effect. Notably, the vaccines contain pentavalent sodium stibogluconate. The side effects of this substance mirror the side effects commonly reported after vaccination, including: nausea, vomiting, myalgia, headache, lethargy and ECG changes. Long term side effects of pentavalent sodium stibogluconate administration in the blood also mirror long term side effects of vaccinated individuals, including damage to the liver and heart, pneumonia, blood count damage, and liver dysfunction.

Sources include: [PDF]

Millions of gallons of untreated sewage from Mexico spilling into San Diego, forcing beach closures

Image: Millions of gallons of untreated sewage from Mexico spilling into San Diego, forcing beach closures

(Natural News) San Diego is contending with millions of gallons of raw sewage that are flowing into the city from Mexico via a pair of canyons on the border.

The sewage spill began when a construction crew accidentally ruptured a significant pipeline near Tijuana, forcing the closure of several pump stations that send sewage away from the border toward the coastline. This caused wastewater to escape from the collection system and drain into natural channels such as the canyons and the Tijuana River.

As a result of the contamination, San Diego has been forced to close some of its beaches. The county of San Diego’s Department of Environmental Health currently lists several major closures in connection with the sewage spill. The Imperial Beach and Silver Strand shorelines are currently closed because the bacteria levels there exceed health standards, and residents are being advised to avoid contact with the water in this area. Several other shorelines in the area are open but under an advisory related to the presence of bacteria.

Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre has said that her top priority is cleaning up pollution that flows into the area from Tijuana, saying: “I’ve said it 1,000 times, but I’ll keep saying it until it’s fixed: It’s an environmental injustice.”

The current spill is largely concentrated in Smuggler’s Gulch and Goat Canyon, where concrete capture basins are serving to redirect at least some of the flow toward an international wastewater treatment plant situated on the border. The South Bay wastewater facility normally treats around 25 million gallons of sewage per day but has been taking on an extra 10 million gallons each day to try to stem the impact of the spill.


The Area Operations Manager in San Diego for the American section of the International Boundary and Water Commission, Morgan Rogers, noted: “We can sustain this, but it is adding wear and tear on our plant.”

Rogers added that Mexican officials hope to build a temporary bypass pipe that can be used to restore the flow of sewage to their wastewater plant, but that will take several days.

It is expected to take at least another week to fix the broken pipe, but experts warn that this will not fully address the pollution that comes from the aging San Antonio de Los Buenos wastewater plant in Punta Bandera, which is situated 6 miles south of the border near Tijuana.

Estimates from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency show that the treatment plant sends roughly 35 million gallons of raw sewage per day into the Pacific Ocean. This waste often floats up the coast, leading to beach closures.

No easy solutions

The EPA has a $630 million plan to deal with sewage pollution flowing in from Mexico that includes expanding the international wastewater treatment plant in San Diego. Projects related to this plan could get underway within the next three years. However, the agency warns that it will be impossible to fully stop the flood of urban runoff that is caused by heavy rains, and Tijuana needs to make significant investments in improving its infrastructure.

San Diego has been dealing with untreated sewage leaking over the border from Tijuana since at least the 1930s. Although some advancements were made in reducing the problem during the 1990s, Tijuana’s plumbing is struggling to keep up with the city’s population growth.

In August, U.S. officials had to loan equipment to Mexico when a crucial set of sewer pipes situated at the top of a canyon that drains into San Diego broke in half. Like the current incident, the cause of the problem on that occasion was human error. Only one of those pipes has been fixed, which means that the bulk of Tijuana’s sewage diversion from the U.S. relies on that single pipe remaining functional.

Sources for this article include:

Five-acre plastic plant pots warehouse in Florida CATCHES FIRE, releasing fumes similar to those at Ohio train derailment site

Image: Five-acre plastic plant pots warehouse in Florida CATCHES FIRE, releasing fumes similar to those at Ohio train derailment site

(Natural News) Just days after a Norfolk Southern freight train carrying vinyl chloride and other hazardous chemicals derailed and suffered a “controlled explosion,” a massive five-acre plastic plant pot warehouse caught fire in Kissimmee, Fla.

The nursery supply company initially lost about two acres’ worth of plastic planters that were set ablaze in the inferno before the entire five acres went up in smoke. The cause of the fire is still under investigation.

The incident occurred around 2am when local firemen were notified about flames and smoke at Nursey Supplies, Inc., located at 2050 Ave. A in Kissimmee. The nursery itself did not catch fire, but the warehouse did. Flames as high as two stories tall were reported – watch the videos below:

? BREAKING: Massive 5 acre fire has broken out a warehouse storing plastic plant pots in Kissimmee, Florida.

Hazmat teams are monitoring air quality due to the large amount of smoke coming from the burning plastics.

Residents with breathing issues should remain indoors.

— Upward News (@UpwardNewsHQ) February 16, 2023

NEW video and a LIVE look of a fire burning in Kissimmee, Florida at a plant nursery. Thousands of plastic planters are reportedly on fire. #KOMONews

— Holly Menino (@hollymenino) February 16, 2023

(Related: In addition to the East Palestine train derailment incident, Ohio suffered another major disaster last fall when an oil refinery that mysteriously caught fire had to be shut down.)

Officials claim the type of plastic that burned is non-toxic (yeah right…)

The latest reports indicate that the fire is now 100 percent contained, but just like in Ohio there are now major concerns among locals throughout the area that chemical residues have toxified water, soil, and crop fields.

Public health officials claim there is no risk at all because the types of plastics burned in the blaze do not produce toxic smoke or ash.

“These pots are burning into soot, just carbon, and carbon monoxide, a small amount that dissipates in the air, carbon dioxide and water. Nothing exotic,” said Dr. Todd Husty, a public health official.

“No cyanide like you can get in some fires. No exotic chemicals like you can get in some fires.”

This is hard to believe considering the thick black smoke that filled the air as flames shot up into the night sky. The smoke plumes could be seen from miles away, including at the somewhat nearby Walt Disney World resort in Orlando.

No injuries were reported, but plenty of questions remain unanswered as to the cause of the fire, as well as the extent of the chemical fallout.


“It was done deliberately,” one commenter on a news story about the incident suggested. “It was no accident.”

“America is on fire and burning to the ground,” wrote another.

“Scorched earth, poison the well, salt the earth – this is where the New World Order and the globalists are at on their agenda to destroy the United States as we once knew it,” said another, forlorn about what he sees as the engineered destruction of the country.

Someone else who looked up the types of pots Nursery Supplies manufacturers and sells observed that they are used by many to grow food, which means this could be another attack on Americans’ food sovereignty.

“I have their site pulled up now and it looks like they make the type of pots, trays, etc. that you buy for food and flowering plants in the spring,” this person wrote.

“The site says: ‘For years, we’ve been quietly researching eco-friendly manufacturing practices, developing new production capabilities to accommodate recycled materials and building our own in-house plastics recycling processes’. So I doubt this and many other attacks are run of the mill leftist eco crazies. I’m willing to bet that somebody that already works for some branch of our government is getting orders and extra pay to do these attacks.”

More related news can be found at

Sources for this article include:

Why the Offered Restitution Isn’t Restitution — No More Taxation, Period

 By Anna Von Reitz

Many people have received word from various sources that their share of the spoils collected from the guilty foreign governmental services corporations is $13,200,000.00.  
This is incorrect.  It’s actually a lot more.  That’s just part of the “restitution” owed.  
If you and everyone else were to receive this so-called restitution payment as “Federal Reserve Notes” it would be worthless or be made worthless in short order, because of the hyperinflation induced by that much cash value hitting the economy all at once.  
The guilty parties could stand back and say, “See, we repaid you!” — worthless paper, that is, and then your own stupidity spending it like drunken sailors would render it even more worthless.  
All that glitters is not gold.  
The rest of their proposal stinks like an old outhouse, too.  
A 14% “sales tax” on new purchases?  What for?  There is enough money in the remaining Slush Funds to fund every aspect of public spending forevermore.  That’s just a gratuitous charge to keep people believing in the “need” for taxation when there hasn’t been any valid reason for taxation since 1941. 
Enough already.  
And while they pretend that they are implementing the NESARA that resulted from the efforts of General Roy Schwasinger (and my Mother, by the way) they are instead implementing the “substitute” proposal deceptively abbreviated the same way.  
There are two (2) “NESARAs” — the National Economic Security and Restoration Act is the actual NESARA, but there is also the National Economic Stabilization and Reform Act — another doppelganger that they are trying to pass off the same way that they passed off “Confederate States” — that is, states-of-states, for actual States of the Union.  
The actual NESARA never included any taxation measures and doesn’t provide for lump sum payouts of the kind these yahoos are trying to foist off.  
So — buyer beware.  If you accept their offered  $13,200,000.00 worth of paper, you sever your claim to your own land and home and names and other intellectual property, and allow them to settle their actual debt to you and yours for less than pennies on the dollar.  
You and your children also tie yourselves to a 14% gratuity tax on everything you buy except “new purchases” — the big problem is that they still get to define what is taxable and what isn’t.  They can redefine “new” and “non-essential” and pretty soon you will be giving them 14% of everything including income from selling land and gold and anything else. 
Don’t forget you are both Buyers and Sellers and any burden of tax collection or payment that you place on others also falls on you! 
So, their version of “NESARA” just isn’t good enough.  It does nothing to return your stolen land and other property interests to you.  It attempts to pay off debt owed to you with credit that is also owed to you.  
It attempts to substitute a different “NESARA” for the one you are owed.
It guarantees the collapse of the Federal Reserve Note due to hyperinflation, which would make any “restitution” based on it worthless in short order.  You’d be paying a million such “dollars” for a loaf of bread. 
So, wise up, Campers, and don’t take any wooden nickels from British Flim-Flam artists.  

See this article and over 4000 others on Anna’s website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.  

U.S. tells Ukraine it cannot provide strategic missiles because American forces simply don't have enough

Image: U.S. tells Ukraine it cannot provide strategic missiles because American forces simply don’t have enough

(Natural News) For once, the Biden regime appears to be telling the Ukrainian government to pound sand over its latest weapons request.

The United States has notified Ukraine that it does not possess sufficient numbers of Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMs), which have a range of 190 miles, to provide assistance to Kyiv, as the conflict between Ukraine and Russia continues to escalate with a new Russian offensive. The news comes as Ukraine seeks greater military support from the Biden government in its ongoing conflict.

According to Politico, the U.S. has informed Ukraine that it lacks the necessary number of long-range missiles to provide military aid. While Biden has provided other forms of military assistance to Ukraine, including weapons and training, the lack of long-range missiles could be a significant setback for Ukraine’s efforts to defend itself against Russia’s new offensives, Politico reported, adding that the U.S. military has to retain what inventory it has in case its own forces need them.

“With any package, we always consider our readiness and our own stocks while providing Ukraine what it needs on the battlefield,” said a senior DoD official. “There are other ways of providing Ukraine with the capabilities it needs to strike the targets.”

The situation in Ukraine has been tense for years, with Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and ongoing conflict in the Donbass region. The recent escalation of violence has only added to the already volatile situation, as Ukraine has sought support from the U.S. and NATO.


However, with the news that the US does not possess enough long-range missiles to provide assistance, Ukraine may attempt to purchase ATACMs from other countries that have them such as Poland, Romania, Greece, Turkey, South Korea, Qatar and Bahrain. The longer-range missiles can be used with the HIMARS rocket systems that Ukraine already possesses.

Politico noted further that Laura Cooper, the Pentagon’s top policy official for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia issues, said in a recent interview that “with every single capability that we provide, whether you’re talking, you know, HIMARS or you’re talking a particular kind of missile or ammunition, we’re always looking at the availability of our stocks, we’re looking at production considerations, and so that’s true of every capability, and we make decisions accordingly.”

Throughout the nearly one-year-old war, the U.S. has been providing military aid to Ukraine, but the high demand for weapons has led to concerns that the US military’s weapon stocks are becoming depleted. The Biden administration has promised to provide various forms of support to Ukraine, including weapons, but the rapid pace at which they are being sent is causing concerns. As the conflict escalated and then lasted months, the US military sent weapons like anti-tank missiles, small arms, and other forms of military hardware. But, with such high demand, the US military’s stock of weapons is now being depleted faster than it can be replenished. The same is true for some other NATO countries.

The Biden regime has also been criticized, mostly by Republicans, for sending too many weapons to Ukraine, as this could put a strain on the US military’s ability to respond to other potential conflicts or threats. Some have also raised concerns about the impact of US military support on the conflict, particularly in regards to civilian casualties.

There have been calls for the Biden administration to find a diplomatic solution to the conflict, rather than relying solely on military intervention. However, the US government has stated that it will continue to support Ukraine in its efforts to defend itself against Russian aggression.

In addition to draining our weapon stockpiles, Biden’s handlers are also draining our strategic oil reserves as well. That means not only will our troops be short of sophisticated weapons, but our war machine will lack the fuel to power itself.

Sources include: