On the evening of February 25, Woody Harrelson was the guest host of Saturday Night Live. Assuming the tone and posture of a jester such as Will Sommers in the court of Henry VIII—that is, playing the fool while speaking frankly to potentially dangerous people—the comedian and actor told his audience the truth. He began by saying that in the year 2019, he was presented with a movie pitch that was “the craziest I’ve ever heard.”
So the movie goes like this: The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes. And people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over,” Harrelson said. “I threw the script away. I mean, who was going to believe that crazy idea? Being forced to do drugs? I do that voluntarily all day.
On the evening of February 25, Woody Harrelson was the guest host of Saturday Night Live. Assuming the tone and posture of a jester such as Will Sommers in the court of Henry VIII—that is, playing the fool while speaking frankly to potentially dangerous people—the comedian and actor told his audience the truth. He began by saying that in the year 2019, he was presented with a movie pitch that was “the craziest I’ve ever heard.”
So the movie goes like this: The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes. And people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over,” Harrelson said. “I threw the script away. I mean, who was going to believe that crazy idea? Being forced to do drugs? I do that voluntarily all day.
This morning a friend sent me a report on Mr. Harrelson’s monologue and a summary of mainstream media reporting on it, which characterized his remarks as “anti-vaccine conspiracy theory.” As the German philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer, noted:
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Judging by commentary in Variety, the Washington Post, Rolling Stone, USA Today, Vanity Fair, Hollywood Reporter, the Daily Beast, Page Six, Yahoo Entertainment, TMZ, Forbes, and People, many American journalists are still stuck in the first brainwashed stage in their response to this truth. Though their particular egos may never allow them to accept this truth as self-evident, most of humanity eventually will.
A notable apostate from the current orthodoxy was Elon Musk, who tweeted of the media response:
Maybe they don’t realize that their propaganda is wrong.
It’s also notable that much of the commentary characterizes Harrelson’s monologue as “anti-vaccine” or “anti-vax,” even though he used the word “drugs” and not “vaccine.” This suggests that his critics are fully aware of the scheme that was imposed on us—lock everyone down, offer the vaccine as the sole and necessary way back to safety and normalcy, insist and even mandate that we all get it.
(Natural News) Commenting on the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” experiment this week, former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) head Tony Fauci confessed that the shots do not work as claimed.
“Attempting to control mucosal respiratory viruses with systemically administered non-replicating vaccines has thus far been largely unsuccessful,” Fauci wrote in a new paper published in the journal Cell Host & Microbe, entitled “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and other respiratory viruses.”
Even after aggressively pushing the shots himself, Fauci, recognizing the country’s now-widespread disapproval of Operation Warp Speed, admits that everything America and the world were told about Fauci Flu shots was a lie – oops!
Now, suddenly, Fauci is of the persuasion – even though he claimed the opposite previously – that Chinese Virus shots are inefficacious, meaning they do not work. It is much preferable, Fauci’s new study admits, to rely on natural immunity.
“The review makes clear that vaccines against respiratory viruses such as influenza or coronaviruses (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 responsible for COVID) are highly unlikely to achieve the levels of effectiveness we expect from other vaccines,” writes David Bell for The Epoch Times.
“The authors note CDC data showing influenza vaccines, now pushed for all ages from 6 months upward, have an efficacy ranging from just 14 percent to a maximum of 60 percent since 2005 (extending back 17 years would have lowered this to 10 percent, with the average vaccine efficacy (VE) just below 40 percent).”
(Related: In the summer of 2021, Fauci admitted publicly that covid “vaccines” are responsible for spreading more disease – but Biden kept on forcing them.)
Vaccines don’t work against respiratory viruses, period
Because viruses are constantly mutating into new “variants” and “subvariants,” trying to control them with vaccines is a fool’s errand. Even if a shot works, or seems to work, against the original virus, that original virus will quickly outsmart the vaccine, rendering it useless.
“… our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases,” Fauci’s paper reads. “… it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines.”
“The vaccines for these two very different viruses have common characteristics: they elicit incomplete and short-lived protection against evolving virus variants that escape population immunity.”
The paper goes on to explain that viruses replicate predominantly in local mucosal tissue without causing viremia. This means that viruses never properly encounter the immune system or the full force of the adaptive immune response, which takes up to a week to fully mature.
This is well past the point of viral replication and onward transmission to others, hence why even the powers that be admitted that covid jabs could not stop infection or transmission, rendering them useless.
It was also a misnomer, Fauci now says, for the authorities to focus on circulating antibodies like IgG and IgM in controlling covid infection. It turns out that mucosal antibodies like IgA, located in the lining of the upper respiratory tract, play a much larger role in immunity – and these mucosal antibodies are not at all stimulated by injected vaccines.
“The importance of mucosal secretory IgA (sIgA) in pathogen-specific responses against respiratory viral infections has long been appreciated for influenza viruses, RSV and more recently SARS-CoV-2,” the paper further explains.
When even Fauci is forced to confess that the jabs he once promoted are an absolute farce and that natural immunity is the much better option, you know the jig is up.
“Fauci is pretending the ‘vaccine’ was a failure when it is, and was always intended to be, a bioweapon – and Fauci has always known this,” one commenter wrote. “I’m not fooled by him and you shouldn’t be either. He’s trying to save his own butt.”
The latest news about Fauci and his band of career criminals can be found at FauciTruth.com.
(Natural News) The United States Department of Energy (DoE) has reassessed its position on the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), which the agency now admits may have come from a “laboratory leak” in communist China.
A classified intelligence report shared with the White House and “key members of Congress,” according to The Wall Street Journal, explains that early on, the Energy Department was unsure about how the so-called “virus” emerged. Later on, however, the Energy Department decided that it is entirely possible that covid escaped from a Chinese lab.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) also agrees that covid probably escaped “via a mishap at a Chinese laboratory,” to quote the Journal. At least four other agencies are still claiming natural transmission, while two others remain undecided as to covid’s origins.
“New intelligence,” we are told, changed the Energy Department’s view on the matter. Still, the agency has judged the new revelations with “low confidence,” meaning it cannot say for certain, beyond all shadow of a doubt, that covid leaked from a lab.
The FBI is slightly more certain about the lab leak theory, giving it a rating of “moderate confidence.” (Related: After initially denying the possibility, The Lancetswitched sides back in late 2021 by admitting that the covid lab leak theory has merit.)
Is covid natural or a ruse?
The FBI’s moderate confidence assessment stems from work conducted by its cadre of microbiologists, immunologists, and other scientists, all of whom are supported by the National Bioforensic Analysis Center, established at Fort Detrick, Md., in 2004 to analyze anthrax and other potential biological threats.
Did the Energy Department rely on the findings of this same work to come up with its low confidence assessment? The answer to that question remains a mystery as the government is declining to provide any further details as to the impetus behind its change in position.
U.S. officials have said that the reasons for the Energy Department’s embrace of the lab leak theory differ from those of the FBI. Both agencies came to much the same conclusion using different methods, we are told.
The National Intelligence Council along with four other unnamed federal agencies still assess with “low confidence” the notion that covid came about through natural transmission from an infected animal, i.e., contaminated bat soup at a Wuhan wet market.
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and at least one other agency that remains unnamed both remain undecided as to covid’s origins, according to people who read the classified report.
Across the board, the federal government maintains the position that covid is definitely not a biological weapon created by communist China – that narrative goes too far, they claim.
The less-than-five-pages update was not requested by Congress, though numerous House and Senate Republicans are pursuing their own investigations into the origins of covid.
Fake president Joe Biden, however, did request that every intelligence agency do its best to discern the matter through close examination and investigation of all available evidence.
“Biden specifically requested that the national labs, which are part of the Energy Department, be brought into this assessment because he wants to put every tool at use to be able to figure out what happened here,” said U.S. national security adviser Jake Sullivan.
There are a “variety of views in the intelligence community,” Sullivan added. “A number of them have said they just don’t have enough information.”
Sullivan, a Republican member of Congress from Alaska, added that he and his colleagues need to hold extensive hearings about the matter, especially since communist China was aggressively trying to stop the rest of the world from looking into covid’s origins.
“This is a country that has no problem coming out and lying to the world,” Sullivan said about China.
Want to learn more about the never-ending story known as covid? Visit Plague.info.
(Natural News) Actor Woody Harrelson (True Detective, Natural Born Killers) went on “Saturday Night Live” for the fifth time in his career. At the end of his monologue, he took a shot at the vaccine manufacturers — comparing them to drug cartels.
“So, the movie goes like this,” Harrelson said. “The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes.”
“And people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over,” Harrelson added. “I threw the script away. I mean, who was going to believe that crazy idea? Being forced to do drugs? I do that voluntarily all day long!”
Harrelson comes under fire for calling out the bought-off media and the drug cartels
Harrelson came under fire for his joke about the media and politicians doing the dirty work of the drug cartels (vaccine makers). Harrelson isn’t afraid to speak up about vaccine mandates and lockdowns, even in a Hollywood culture that promoted this hell from day one. Harrelson broke from the Saturday Night Live–approved script and called out the drug cartels that have taken over the media and made puppets out of the politicians.
Of course, the bought-off media was furious at his joke, and pundits were quick to prove the comedian’s point. After the joke went viral, the mainstream media went on full attack mode, resorting to medical Apartheid slurs like “antivaxxer” to describe the actor. Funny enough, shaming people as “antivaxxers” has lost its appeal over the past two years, as the majority of the population has come to question the never-ending hell of covid-19 boosters, mandates, and restrictions. The medial mafia will need to come up with a new word, a new tactic; the shaming of “antivaxxers” has failed.
Some liberals are starting to recognize the hell they inflicted on themselves and their neighbors
While full accountability for lockdowns, human rights abuses, and deadly vaccines will take some time to realize, there is a shift of mindset taking place for some of the authoritarian liberals who advocated for lockdowns and forced injections.
One Twitter user pointed out: “People don’t seem to understand, Woody Harrelson is what liberals used to be.” Hopefully soon, it will be trendy again for liberals to question Big Pharma. While liberals typically tout “my body, my choice,” they unilaterally didn’t stand up for body autonomy rights during the covid-19 scandal. This is because they have always actually been about “your body, my choice.” This is true when it comes to killing innocent babies, when it comes to confusing someone else’s child about their gender and leading them to a life of self-mutilation, or when it comes to abusing someone else’s child with forced masks, forced swabs, and forced injections.
During the covid-19 scandal, the Democratic Party and its compliant simps unilaterally fought for lockdowns, segregation, loss of medical privacy, the shredding of the U.S. Constitution, the family separation in hospitals, forced gene-altering vaccines, forced oxygen restriction, school closures, and mass mental illness (social distancing). Many liberally-minded people are starting to come out of that cult, that mass formation psychosis. Still, it’s hard for these types of people to forgive themselves for the pain they inflicted on their own body and mind, for the hell they tried to force onto their neighbors, family, and friends. Many have committed suicide, overdosed on drugs, or died suddenly and unexpectedly from heart complications and blood clots caused by their false savior.
The drug cartels will not be held accountable for mass murder and abuse of human rights unless those who complied with the brainwashing and terror actually repent, actually turn from their ways, and join the brave ones who have fought courageously against this hell from the beginning.
(Natural News) The U.S. Congress quietly empowered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by approving a provision in the omnibus spending bill that would give the agency the ability to ban off-label uses of medical devices.
Doctors are concerned that the new bill would allow the FDA – which is led by non-practicing doctors – to interfere with the physician-patient relationship. They also worry that it could extend the ban to prohibit the off-label use of prescription drugs. The said provision was buried in Sec. 3306, page 3,542 of the 4,155-page omnibus appropriations bill that was signed into law at the end of last year.
Endpoints News Senior Editor Zachary Brennan told WBUR that the federal agency requested the said amendment after a string of court losses. A decision by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia involved a 2020 final rule in which the FDA banned the use of an electrical stimulation device, only in the treatment of self-injurious behaviors such as head banging and self-biting. The agency didn’t ban other uses of these devices, such as treating addiction.
The court held that the FDA had the power to ban a medical device altogether under Section 36 0f of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) if it poses “an unreasonable and substantial risk of illness or injury.” However, stopping a practitioner from prescribing or using an otherwise approved device for a specific off-label indication would violate another FDCA section, which bars the FDA from regulating the “practice of medicine.”
Some physicians expressed doubt about FDA as it may fail to restrain itself. “FDA lobbyists got congress [sic] to grant the agency the power to ban some uses of medications,” Johns Hopkins medical professor and National Academy of Medicine member Marty Makary tweeted last week.
“That’s truly arrogant to think that the federal government is the one and only one who knows better than the physicians at the state boards of medicine about what good medicine is or what it isn’t,” said Brad Thompson, an attorney at the firm Epstein Becker Green who counsels medical device and drug product companies on FDA regulatory issues.
Joel Zinberg of the Wall Street Journal mirrored Thompson’s sentiment. “This is a problem for many reasons. The statute gives the FDA the power, without any public input, to prevent patients’ access to off-label therapies even though their physicians and their patients have found the treatments to be beneficial or even essential. That was the situation in the Rotenberg case, in which the center and the families of patients had to sue the FDA because the banned devices were often the only effective treatment to keep patients from harming themselves,” he said.
Zinberg further pointed out that allowing the agency to ban certain off-label uses will impair clinical progress. He said off-label use enables physicians to assess their patient’s unique circumstances and use their own evolving scientific knowledge in deciding to try approved products for new indications.
“If the treatment proves useful, formal studies are performed and published. If enough evidence accumulates, the treatment becomes the standard of care, even if the manufacturer did not submit the product for a separate, lengthy and costly FDA review,” he said.
“Secret” provision could target ivermectin as COVID-19 treatment
The provision in the omnibus appropriations bill could have been silently amended and approved to target certain “off-label” medications, including ivermectin.
“It may be that the clause is specifically directed to forbidding the use of e.g. ivermectin in COVID, for which data are mixed,” David Livermore, retired professor of medical microbiology at the University of East Anglia, told Just the News via an email.
He called it “a disgrace and a dereliction of duty” that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has yet to “properly study ivermectin either as a treatment or a prophylactic for COVID,” giving the FDA cover to potentially ban such use.
“The feds relied on fake studies to demonize low-cost COVID treatments,” said Yale University epidemiologist Harvey Risch.
Greg Piper, a contributor to Just the News wrote: “The new FDA authority could complicate a lawsuit by doctors that claims the agency effectively banned them from prescribing ivermectin to treat COVID by repeatedly telling the public the award-winning antiviral was dangerous for humans and providing false grounds for medical license investigations.”
Follow FDA.news to know more about the agency’s recent policies and regulations.
