Popular French author faces criminal charges for “misgendering” a male mayor with gender dysphoria by calling him “a man” – which he IS

Image: Popular French author faces criminal charges for “misgendering” a male mayor with gender dysphoria by calling him “a man” – which he IS

(Natural News) Best-selling French author, feminist and social media influencer Dora Moutot is being taken to court for the alleged “crime” of “misgendering” two transgenders based on their actual biological sex.

Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes Mayor “Marie Cau,” a male who now pretends to be a woman, and Hanneli Escurier, a female journalist who pretends to be a man, are both upset at Moutot for calling them what they actually are, rather than what they are pretending to be.

The two mentally deranged individuals are suing Moutot with the support of Mousse and SOS Homophobie, two LGBT organizations that apparently believe people should be punished for refusing to play-pretend on demand with other people’s made-up gender pronouns.

One of the incidents arose when Moutot was asked by journalist Léa Salamé on the popular French talk show Quelle Époque! whether she regarded Mayor Cau as a woman. Moutot responded with, “To me, Marie Cau is a man.”

Mousse responded to this statement by accusing Moutot of “violently attacking” Cau by calling him both a man, which he is, as well as a “transfeminine man.”

Cau, whose natural-born name is Nicolas, was elected to political office in 2020 and celebrated by the globalist-controlled media as France’s first transgender mayor. The tiny town where he is mayor has a population of about 500 people, and Cau hopes to eventually run for president in France.

(Related: In California, some left-wing activists and politicians want to punish pastors who refuse to use “gender pronouns” and promote transgender perversion.)


In the U.K., Greece, Norway, and now France, all it takes is false accusations by deranged trannies to trigger criminal proceedings

Moutot’s other “offence” occurred on Aug. 25, 2022, when she referred to Escurier as a “trans-identified woman.” The legal complaint filed against her for this reference alleges that “trans-identified woman” is an offensive term aimed at inciting hatred or violence.

Escurier, meanwhile, has repeatedly denigrated actual women by calling them “TERFs,” a derogatory term, and also “threatened to physically harm Moutot herself at a drag event in 2020 that was held at a club in Paris.”

Moutot responded to this threat by calling Escurier a “trans-identified woman,” and now Moutot is being accused of criminal behavior while Escurier faces no charges and continues to parade around her mental illness as a “gender identity.”

Not only in France but also in the United Kingdom, Greece, and Norway, all it takes is for false accusations like the ones lobbed at Moutot by both Cau and Escurier to trigger criminal proceedings. LGBTs, conversely, can say whatever they want, whenever they want, and never face any kind of punishment.

Fragile trannies like Cau and Escurier are so “hurt” by words that they feel compelled to try to ruin other people’s lives simply for saying them. Tranny fragility is fast becoming one of the biggest existential threats to normal people everywhere, especially when their feelings get enshrined in the law, as seems to be happening in the U.K., France, and other parts of Europe.

“I’ve been harassed for almost four years now by trans activists for saying that a woman is a human female and not a feeling,” Moutot says about the abuse she continues to face at the hands of deranged trannies and their allies.

“They send me insults and threats, they put my address online, and they ruined my reputation by saying that I’m transphobic, and that I am a far-right accomplice.”

Moutot’s life and career are threatened by these same trannies, which want her fired and canceled.

Interested in keeping up with the latest transgender news? You can do so at Transhumanism.news.

Sources for this article include:



CANCEL CULTURE ON DISPLAY: LinkedIn bans reporter Ben Sellers for mentioning Durham Report

Image: CANCEL CULTURE ON DISPLAY: LinkedIn bans reporter Ben Sellers for mentioning Durham Report

(Natural News) The long-awaited Durham Report was released this week, and Big Tech is already going after those brave enough to talk about it online.

Ben Sellers of Headline USA was axed from LinkedIn, a purported career-building social media platform owned by Microsoft, for daring to even just mention the Durham Report.

In Sellers’ view, LinkedIn is worse than even Facebook and Twitter, calling it “one of the most egregious social media offenders in terms of practicing anti-conservative bias and censorship.”

One day after the Durham Report was released, Sellers posted a response to Meredith Kopit Levien, the president and chief executive officer (CEO) of The New York Times, asking whether or not the fake news giant is planning to return the Pulitzer Prize it received for reporting on and pushing the Russia Collusion hoax.

In light of special counsel John Durham’s final confirmation that the Russia Collusion hoax was just that, a complete fabrication spearheaded by two-time failed presidential wannabe Hillary Clinton, Barack Hussein Obama, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), it would only make sense for the Times to return the Pulitzer it was given.

Not long after Sellers pressed Levien about this, he received a notice from LinkedIn that his comment “doesn’t comply with our policies.”

“Your comment goes against our policy on bullying and harassment,” the notice explained. “It has been removed and only you can access it.”

(Related: Early on, DNI Ratcliffe supposed that Joe Biden might not even be installed into the White House at all, but it turns out the investigation and report took a while longer to complete.)


The New York Times has become an embarrassing joke of a fake newspaper under Levien’s leadership

Levien’s initial post, the one to which Sellers was responding, referenced Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger, who claimed that the fake newspaper’s mission demands “a deep analysis and frequent skepticism of the public narrative.”

Nothing could be further from the truth when it comes to the Russia Collusion hoax that the Times pushed. And Sellers wanted to know how Levien could, in good conscience, claim that such a thing is still true at the fake newspaper following its handling of the Russia Collusion hoax.

Rather than respond like a mature adult, Levien apparently tattle-taled to LinkedIn about how she was being “harassed” by Sellers, and the rest is now history: He has been punished like a third grader who stayed out at recess too long, this being the M.O. form of retaliation by Big Tech against those who dare to question establishment lies and hypocrisy.

Sellers wrote sarcastically that the “lovely sentiment” of A.G. Sulzberger’s statements about the Times are apparently no longer true, and are clearly out of step with the fake newspaper’s actual treatment of the Russia Collusion conspiracy theory it helped spread.

“I later issued a post of my own calling on fellow journalists to urge the Times to return its ill-gotten Pulitzer award, and tagging Levien in my post,” Sellers explained.

“Not long thereafter, around 11 a.m. Tuesday, a notice arrived from LinkedIn’s so-called Trust and Safety Team that I had violated its policies on ‘bullying and harassment.’”

Sellers was given the option to petition his strike with LinkedIn after being accused of “bullying and harassment,” which “includes targeted personal attacks, intimidation, shaming, disparagement, and abusive language directed at other members.”

“You may not engage in trolling or other repetitive negative content that disrupts other members or conversations on the platform,” the notice read.

When Sellers tried to appeal this through the link given by LinkedIn, he was blocked out of his account entirely, and met with a notice that he had been “restricted.” To date, he has received no valid explanation for this abusive treatment by LinkedIn.

More related news about Big Tech’s canceling of truth-tellers can be found at Censorship.news.

Sources for this article include:



Flesh-eating “zombie drug” tranq now FLOODING the streets of Los Angeles

Image: Flesh-eating “zombie drug” tranq now FLOODING the streets of Los Angeles

(Natural News) The flesh-eating “zombie drug” xylazine, known by its street name “tranq,” has now saturated the streets of Los Angeles.

Xylazine is approved in the U.S. for use in cows and horses. It began flooding the illicit drug market in recent years, with dealers often cutting it with banned substances like cocaine and heroin or with opioids like fentanyl, the lethally potent synthetic opioid that kills tens of thousands of Americans every year. (Related: Skin-rotting animal tranquilizer drug known as “tranq” spreads all over US.)

Spreading all over the U.S. earlier this year, it has since inundated Los Angeles, with local news crews capturing dozens of people in the city’s streets high on the drug.

The Los Angeles County Health Department, along with the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), have issued warnings about the spread of xylazine. Specifically, the DEA has warned how xylazine is often mixed with fentanyl and its effects somehow can’t be reversed by Narcan, a drug that specifically reverses or reduces the effects of opioids.

“Xylazine is making the deadliest drug threat our country has ever faced – fentanyl – even deadlier,” warned DEA Administrator Anne Milgram.

Statistics indicate that xylazine-related overdose deaths in the U.S. are on the rise. In Pennsylvania alone, tranq-related overdose deaths increased from two percent in 2015 to 26 percent in 2020.

Similar rates of overdose deaths connected to tranq have been reported in states like Connecticut and Maryland, where 10 percent and 19 percent of drug overdoses in 2020 involved xylazine, respectively.


Los Angeles officials having trouble tracking down xylazine spread

According to officials from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office, they are now taking more concrete steps to track the presence of xylazine in confiscated drugs. The reason it has not ranked higher on the sheriff’s office’s radar in the past is because it technically isn’t an illegal substance.

When crime lab analysts detect xylazine in other illicit substances, authorities tend to focus on the other substances rather than on the animal tranquilizer even though its presence is what makes these other illicit substances all the more deadly.

“It’s really gruesomely disfiguring people,” warned DEA Special Agent Bill Bodner in an interview with KTLA. “It’s much more likely to stop someone from breathing and the things that come along with xylazine, it’s a vasoconstrictor. So, when you’re injecting it, it’s actually reducing blood circulation.”

In Los Angeles, demand for tranq’s “rollercoaster” high has surged in recent weeks, alarming doctors and local care advocates alike.

Shawn, a resident of Los Angeles’ impoverished Skid Row neighborhood, said in an interview with the New York Post that he has mixed tranq with other drugs on multiple occasions.

“Your heart is pounding really, really, really fast, but you can’t move,” said Shawn. “It’s like, it’s just crazy. I don’t want to sound like I’m saying, ‘It’s the bomb,’ but it’s an amazing effect when it hits your bloodstream. It does something to your mind and there is no pain. Like you’re riding a roller coaster and there’s no pain.”

“I’ve never seen anything like what we’re dealing with right now,” said Cary Quashen, a local addiction expert for Action Family Counseling, a drug addiction rehabilitation organization.

Quashen warned how xylazine is known to have severe effects, including disfiguring people who develop sores that rot internally, which can lead to limb amputations in some cases, and is the main reason why tranq is often referred to as a zombie drug.

“We had a woman come in and her sister had passed away from a fentanyl overdose,” recalled Quashen. “But not only was it a fentanyl overdose, [but] her skin was starting to rot, the muscles in her leg and her arm. So, that’s a sure sign of xylazine.”

Shawn warned that, despite the adverse effects, he sees tranq as becoming much more mainstream.

“It’s like when ecstasy hit. In the beginning, the only group of people who would do that were people that went to raves. And then that exploded. And then Molly [MDMA], and now fentanyl. And now fentanyl mixed with other things like tranq,” said Shawn. “It doesn’t end.

Learn more about the spread of illicit and deadly substances in the U.S. at Addiction.news.

Watch this news broadcast from KESQ discussing tranq in detail.

This video is from the channel The Willow on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Philadelphia’s “Zombieland” Kensington neighborhood continues to suffer from spread of “tranq” drug.

“Zombie drug” made from fentanyl and xylazine now hitting American cities, warns DEA.

ZOMBIE DRUG “Tranq” secretly mixed with fentanyl ROTS human tissue, leading to amputation and more overdose deaths in 48 US states.

Philadelphia’s Kensington neighborhood in CRISIS due to widespread abuse of animal tranquilizer xylazine.

Horse sedative street drug killing thousands in Philadelphia and other US cities.

Sources include:







Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon says COVID-19 pandemic never really happened as was claimed

Image: Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon says COVID-19 pandemic never really happened as was claimed

(Natural News) For former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Mike Yeadon, the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic never really happened.

“There never was a viral pandemic of a novel pathogen. I don’t believe there has been a novel cause of significant illness and death, other than our government’s responses to the fake ‘pandemic,’” he said. “The deaths that we saw, I’m afraid, were medical malpractice at best and murder at worst. Basically, we were lied to from the beginning.”

The former Pfizer executive said health authorities have lied about the public health emergency, as well as the necessity and usefulness of the measures to address COVID-19.

“They lied to us about absolutely everything,” he said. “They lied to us about the magnitude of the public health emergency which never existed. They lied to us about the necessity of having measures like lockdowns, mass testing, social distancing, masks and it goes on and on.” (Related: BOMBSHELL: Former Pfizer executive says covid-19 “pandemic is over,” so-called “second wave” based on fraudulent testing.)

According to Yeadon, every single one of those mandates was known to be ineffective because they fail to stem the transmission.

Yeadon, formerly the chief scientific officer of allergy and respiratory at the New York-based drug giant, said he had spent a long time looking at what was going on in early 2020. He zeroed in on the PCR tests, the absurdity of the COVID-19 lockdowns, and the worries about the COVID-19 injections.


He himself admitted that it was “quite shocking and uncommon” for research scientists like him to put forward such claims because they sound more like conspiracy theories. But Yeadon insisted that he wasn’t sugarcoating things and called on people to be vigilant.

Yeadon: Authorities also lied about the COVID injections

The former Pfizer executive also noted how people were lied to about the research, development and approval of the so-called COVID-19 vaccines. He stumbled upon this in the course of his search for the truth about the pandemic.

According to a March 2021 report by Reuters, Yeadon was one of the co-authors of a petition calling for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to halt clinical trials for the COVID-19 vaccine in late 2020. He and his co-authors even alleged that the COVID-19 injections caused infertility – a claim later proven true.

“Yeadon … has emerged as an unlikely hero of the so-called ‘anti-vaxxers,’ whose adherents question the safety of many vaccines, including for [COVID-19],” the Reuters article stated. “The anti-vaxxer movement has amplified Yeadon’s skeptical views about COVID-19 vaccines and tests, government-mandated lockdowns and the arc of the pandemic.”

Yeadon recounted that when former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told Britons to stay at home, it was the moment he knew freedom had lost. Other countries were doing the same thing, he continued, which made him realize that people were in danger of losing the free world.

He pointed out that the people must face this issue head-on, with the outcome no longer mattering to him anymore. Yeadon expounded: “I’m absolutely serious. If I perish attempting to avert this, it will be fine. It’s about my children and grandchildren.”

Follow Pandemic.news for more news about COVID-19.

Watch Dr. Micheal Yeadon insisting that there was really no COVID-19 pandemic in the video below.

This video is from the High Hopes channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon declares covid vaccines are “toxic by design” – they’re weapons to reduce global population.

Ex-Pfizer scientist Mike Yeadon claims he can prove COVID vaccine batches are materially different and pose unique risks to recipients.

WHO declares end to COVID-19 global public health emergency after its fraudulent policies destroyed lives and economies.

An orchestrated fake “COVID pandemic” was used to destroy health, civil liberty and the doctor/patient relationship.

Noted financial analyst says while COVID pandemic wanes, excess mortality persists, likely due to vaccines.

Sources include:




PHARMACEUTICAL FRAUD: Big Pharma's corporate lawlessness cost Americans over $40B in 2019 alone

Image: PHARMACEUTICAL FRAUD: Big Pharma’s corporate lawlessness cost Americans over $40B in 2019 alone

(Natural News) A recently released collaborative report by two advocate organizations revealed that Big Pharma’s aggressive and often unlawful efforts to prevent competition and keep drug prices elevated have cost American patients, insurers and federal health programs more than $40 billion in 2019 alone.

The report, released on May 16 by the American Economic Liberties Project (AELP) and the Initiative for Medicines, Access and Knowledge (I-MAK), zeroed in on the pharmaceutical giants’ antitrust law violations. According to AELP and I-MAK, these are the main reasons why drug prices in America are skyrocketing at record-high levels compared to those of other rich nations.

“American families are paying far too much for prescription drugs, in large part due to rampant corporate lawlessness,” said Erik Peinert, AELP research manager and editor. “This report documents the many ways Big Pharma is manipulating and breaking the law to expand corporate profits at the expense of patients and taxpayers.”

The teams looked into 100 top-selling drug products in Medicare Part D (which covers prescription medicines) and Medicaid. The Pharma giants broke antitrust laws and increased Part D gross spending by 14.15 percent or $14.82 billion and increased Medicaid gross drug spending by 9.05 percent or $3.15 billion in 2019. (Related: Analysis: Big Pharma jacked up drug prices 1,186 times in 2022 alone.)

“Assuming that pharmaceutical companies’ antitrust violations similarly affected retail brand drug spending, the report estimates that U.S. patients and payers spent an additional $40.07 billion on pharmaceuticals in 2019,” the news site Common Dreams reported.


The report highlights 10 illegal anticompetitive schemes that U.S. pharmaceutical companies deploy to juice their profits and keep prices high, including horizontal collusion, patent fraud, no-generics agreements and sham citizen petitions aimed at convincing regulators to delay approval of potential competing drugs.

FTC reacts by suing to stop Amgen’s acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics

Shortly after the report’s release, the independent agency Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued to stop the biopharmaceutical company Amgen from acquiring Horizon Therapeutics for $27.8 billion.

“Rampant consolidation in the pharmaceutical industry has given powerful companies a pass to exorbitantly hike prescription drug prices, deny patients access to more affordable generics and hamstring innovation in life-saving markets,” Holly Vedova, director of FTC’s Bureau of Competition, said in the statement.

But according to Bloomberg, analysts are concerned about how the agency’s actions would affect drug development and deals.

“Smaller biotech and pharmaceutical companies often lack the money to conduct trials, gain regulatory clearance and get drugs covered by payers, so they pitch their pipeline to larger businesses to get the products across the finish line,” Bloomberg reported.

Bloomberg‘s Intelligence Analyst Marc Engelsgjerd explained: “There would be broad, negative implications for the biotech industry if this deal were ultimately blocked as exiting via acquisition is a standard practice and a common way for larger biopharma to refresh their pipelines.”

Meanwhile, Amgen expressed disappointment in the decision but said it remains committed to the acquisition.

“The agency’s concerns about pricing are speculative and don’t reflect real world competitive dynamics behind providing rare-disease medicines to patients,” the drug manufacturer said in an emailed statement. “We have been working cooperatively over the past several months to address the questions raised by the FTC’s investigative staff and believe we have overwhelmingly demonstrated that this combination poses no legitimate competitive issues.”

As per Peinert, this is FTC fighting back, but it needs more assistance from Congress and other agencies to crack down on these illegal practices and protect the patients.

Check out PharmaceuticalFraud.com for more news on Big Pharma’s fraudulent practices.

Watch the video below that talks about Big Pharma CEO earning $400 million in 2022.

This video is from the Money Talks channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Big Pharma to begin 3D printing microneedle patch “vaccines” for injections on demand.

Groups that aggressively lobbied for covid jab mandates were funded by, you guessed it: PFIZER.

How the Chinese Community Party exploited COVID, Big Pharma to wage war on the US.

Top 5 TRUTHS about Covid “vaccines” Pharma NEVER mentions until they’re forced to.

The lawlessness of the FDA, Big Pharma immunity, and crimes against humanity (opinion).

Sources include:






Gender Transition Surgery: Dreams Turned to Nightmares

  • Children are increasingly lured into “gender-affirming” hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgeries, are never given appropriate informed consent, and they have no idea what they’re getting themselves into. Many adults even underestimate how difficult and painful it will be

  • All it takes for a young girl to start the gender transition process to become a boy is a letter of support from a therapist. Typically, the therapist will write a letter of support after just one or two visits. Next, she’ll be sent to an endocrinologist who, after a single visit, will prescribe her testosterone

  • Some gender transition centers don’t even require any kind of mental health assessment, and several Planned Parenthood clinics are apparently handing out hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prescriptions on the first visit

  • While some pro-trans advocates insist HRT is harmless and reversible once you quit taking the hormones, this simply isn’t true. The effects of testosterone on a girl can be both profound and permanent, and can be seen within a matter of months

  • The transgender movement is a stepping stone in the transhumanist agenda. Ultimately, the goal is to get rid of flesh and blood bodies altogether and have our existence either within a synthetic body or as disembodied avatar in cyberspace, or both. Turning humanity into misgendered people incapable of natural reproduction is merely a first step in that direction

Visit Mercola Market


In the video above, WhatsHerFace Entertainment dives into the “unspoken reality of transgender sexual reassignment surgery and all of the pain, regret and horrors it entails.”

Most clear-headed adults would realize that surgically and chemically altering your anatomy from male to female, or female to male, is a complex and painful process. The problem is that it’s typically not level-headed adults making the decision to undergo gender reassignment. It’s primarily children who are being pushed into it, and they have no idea what they’re getting themselves into. Many adults don’t even realize how difficult and painful it will be.

As reported by WhatsHerFace, all it takes for a young girl to start the gender transition process to become a boy is a letter of support from a therapist. Typically, the therapist will write a letter of support after just one or two visits. Next, she’ll be sent to an endocrinologist who, after a single visit, will prescribe her testosterone.

While that’s alarmingly lax enough, some gender transition centers have cut through even that tiny bit of red tape. Some don’t require any kind of mental health assessment, and a number of Planned Parenthood clinics are apparently handing out hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prescriptions on the first visit.

While some pro-trans advocates insist that HRT is harmless and completely reversible once you quit taking the hormones, this simply isn’t true.

As reported by WhatsHerFace, the effects of testosterone on a girl can be both profound and permanent and can be seen within a matter of months. Effects of high-dose testosterone treatment include:

  • Voice deepening

  • Facial hair growth

  • Hair loss, receding hairline, balding

  • Increased libido

  • Sexual dysfunction

  • Increased aggression and unpredictable moods

  • Sterility

  • Enlargement of clitoris

  • Vaginal atrophy

As noted by Cleveland Clinic,

many of these changes persist even if you completely stop taking testosterone. Can a child or teenager fully comprehend what sterility might mean to them later in life? I don’t think so. I also don’t think they can comprehend how other physical and emotional changes might affect them, such as going bald.

Other types of hormone therapy include puberty blockers, which are given to children who have not yet entered puberty. These drugs delay the onset of sex characteristics associated with the gender you were assigned at birth.

What’s particularly shocking is that the adults steering them toward gender reassignment don’t make it a point to thoroughly inform them about the difficulties they might face. Overall, I don’t think children and teens are capable of making the decision to transition, and encouraging or facilitating it really ought to be illegal.

While you’re considered too immature to get a full, unrestricted driver’s license until you’re 18, and can’t drink alcohol until you’re 21, “gender-affirming” sex hormone therapy can begin as early as 14,

girls who think they’re boys can get a double-mastectomy at the age of 15, and full sex reassignment surgery is available at age 17 or 18, depending on the procedure, although the World Professional Association for Transgender Health is advocating for surgeries as early as 15.

The Boston Children’s Hospital requires you to be 17 to undergo vaginoplasty, where a boy’s penis, testicles and scrotum are removed and a vagina is created, and 18 to undergo phalloplasty, the surgical construction of a penis, or metoidioplasty, where testosterone is used to enlarge the clitoris, from which a small penis is then constructed. Prosthetic testicles are also added in both of those cases.

When a biological woman decides to surgically become a man, she’ll undergo phalloplasty, which involves taking large sections of skin from her forearms and/or thigh to fashion a penis. As you can see from the images included in WhatsHerFace’s video, this will leave a very large unsightly scar on one or both forearms, and while the donation site heals, there’s always a risk of infection.

Since the donation site needs to be hairless, electrolysis must first be performed. If electrolysis fails and hair grows back in the donated skin, the trans male may struggle with painful hair growth inside his urethra for the rest of his life.

Trans men who are on testosterone also face gynecological challenges, especially vaginal dryness, and vaginal atrophy, which can be very painful. Pelvic pain and bacterial vaginosis are other commonly reported issues.

During vaginoplasty, which is where a biological male surgically transitions to female, the surgeon will use skin from the patient’s scrotum to create a vaginal canal. If additional skin grafts are needed, they’ll use skin from the sides of their abdomen.

Before the skin grafts are taken, he must undergo electrolysis on the chosen donor sites. However, electrolysis does not always permanently eliminate hair growth, especially not male hair growth, which tends to be more profuse, and if the hair grows back, the trans male can end up with hair growing in his vaginal canal.

Vaginoplasties aren’t always successful, and if they must be redone, a part of the patient’s colon will typically be used instead. A downside of this procedure, called colovaginoplasty, is an offensive discharge odor.

After vaginoplasty, the patient must then dilate the vagina on a daily basis. This basically entails stretching (dilating) the vagina using a lubricated dildo to prevent it from sealing shut. Your body basically views this new opening as a wound and will do what it can to heal it. Trans women must do this several times a day for the rest of their lives.

Dilation is one of the challenges of male-to-female sex reassignment surgery (SRS) that most people underestimate. Here’s one testimony included in WhatsHerFace’s video.

“Three months ago, I started this ‘dream’ (nightmarish hell) that is SRS … Dilating is Hell, everything is sensitive or sore, my … leg movements are, while better than before, still pretty limited. I feel constant stinging and burning sensations pretty much around the clock in my crotch area.

This is probably the most suicidal I’ve ever been since before I actually transitioned. This ‘vaginal canal’ (which is actually a f***ing open wound) has given me nothing but grievances and Jesus f*** am I tired of it.

I’ve actually been considering asking my surgeon whether or not it’s possible to just close this pseudo-vaginal canal or just get rid of it all together. I wish somebody had told me even just a third of what a hellride this was going to be. But nobody did. And now I’m stuck with this nightmare.

I’m pretty much considering just stopping dilation. ‘The canal will shrink,’ so what? Maintaining it is pretty much keeping my whole … life prisoner of this thing. While I didn’t like what I had before, at all, it still allowed me freedom … For comparison, this shit is like going from parole straight into solitary confinement.”

Sure, you might think, but that’s just recovery. Eventually, all will be well. Maybe, maybe not. Here are the words of a trans female who is still struggling three years after her vaginoplasty.

“Suicidal thoughts. Three years post-op SRS and still having discharge and pain … I had SRS in 2016, August … and I’m experiencing discharge and pain again from my neovagina after it had gone away for two years. Orgasming is very difficult these days and when I do I feel less than half of what I used to feel down there.

I am normally a very strong person who doesn’t easily give up but over the last couple of weeks I find myself crying myself asleep almost every night. Wondering why I had to get this surgery.

Since the surgery I haven’t dated anyone and everyone I have been on a date with turned me down diplomatically when I came out and discussed that I have a neovagina. I’m not saying no one should get this surgery and I’m sure there are people who have amazing results but far too often I hear that people experience complications from SRS.

I find life very draining these days. I have to clean my vagina with isobetadine to keep smell away and to keep the discharge at bay. I have to dilate once a day still. I should have thought things more carefully through. I thought SRS was a wonderful end point to a difficult journey. It opened up a whole other can of worms.

I could have just had anal sex and left my genitals alone and maybe have the testicles removed. Doing something so taxing as having the tissues inverted turned out to be such a bad idea. I wish I could just have the vagina closed up at this point. I don’t see myself ever having sex again either way. I know I should be grateful for having had a surgery of 22,000 CAD paid for by the government. But I feel lied to. I feel so stupid.”

Consider those words, and then consider that pro-trans ideology is now being openly taught in kindergarten through high school across the U.S. Children are being brainwashed into thinking they can choose their own gender and that it’s as easy to switch genders as it is to switch clothes. It’s not.

Yet, the horrors of SRS are being so well hidden that neither parents nor their trans children understand what’s in store, both in the short and long term. While there are cases where everything goes right and the boy or girl finally feels “complete” after SRS,

there seem to be far more cases where they end up even more miserable.

What’s worse, some states, like Washington, are considering laws that severely infringe on parent’s rights to be involved in their child’s decision to transition. For example, as reported by ZeroHedge:

“April 12 [2023], House lawmakers debated Senate Bill 5599,

which creates an exemption for the state that grants it the right to not be required to notify parents of minors who have left their homes because their parents wouldn’t let them pursue gender transition medical procedures …

Republican state Rep. Chris Corry said the bill ‘erodes parental rights in the state of Washington.’ ‘Essentially what the bill would do would be if a child left a parents’ home for certain medical care and went to a shelter or host family, that shelter or host family would not be required to notify the parents of their child’s whereabouts,’ Corry said.

This is obviously a fundamental violation of parental rights and something that’s deeply concerning for parents across Washington state.’ State Rep. Peter Abbarno, a Republican, said the crux of the debate over the bill was whether the state be permitted to ‘essentially hide where the child is.’

Most parents, Corry said, would ‘go to the ends of the earth to find their child’ if they disappeared after an argument. ‘And the fact that we have a bill that may become law that would say, ‘we’re not going to tell you,’ was really just a bridge too far for us,’ Corry said.

Corry told The Epoch Times that, under the bill, a disagreement between a child and parents over the child’s desire for a medical transition constitutes ‘abuse and neglect,’ only because the parent hasn’t ‘properly affirmed what the child wants.’

Corry said there are already laws that protect children from abuse and neglect in the state that require ‘solid and compelling reasons’ why children would need to be removed from their homes. ‘What’s frustrating is even in those cases, the parents still have a right to know where their kids are after they’ve been removed,’ Corry said. ‘In this case, parents would have no idea.’”

According to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, data from Western countries suggest gender dysphoria is now at 8% among children,

compared to just a fraction of a percent among older adults.

Kids who question their gender but aren’t good candidates for permanent transitioning may be as high as 1 in 5!

In the U.S., research suggests 5% of 18- to 29-year-olds identify as trans, compared to 1.6% of 30- to 49-year-olds and only 0.3% of those 50 and older.

How is this even possible? How is it that so many young people are suddenly gender confused? Social pressure appears to have a lot to do with it, and that includes pressure from adults, such as school teachers. But widespread trauma may also play a role.

According to a 2018 transgender identity study

described in Psychology Today,

“rapid-onset gender dysphoria” (ROGD) “appears to be a novel condition that emerges from cohort and contagion effects and novel social pressures.”

As such, its etiology and epidemiology is distinct from conventional gender dysphoria described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Remarkably, 80% of the teens identifying as transgender were girls identifying as boys.

Not surprisingly for those of us who understand how the internet is being used to manipulate impressionable minds, 63.5% of parents reported that shortly before their child announced they were trans, they’d noticed a marked increase in social media consumption. In particular, parents had noticed their child was following popular YouTubers who discussed their transition.

Among the many surprises discovered in that study, the investigator, Dr. Lisa Littman, a behavioral scientist at Brown University, found that one of the many beliefs espoused by these trans teens was that anyone who isn’t specifically transgendered is “evil,” including gays and lesbians. As reported by Psychology Today:

“Parents further reported being derogatorily called ‘breeders’ by their children, or being routinely harassed by children who played ‘pronoun-police.’ The observation that they no longer recognized their child’s voice came up time and again in parental reports.

In turn, the eerie similarity between the youth’s discourse and trans-positive online content was repeatedly emphasized. Youth were described as ‘sounding scripted,’ ‘reading from a script,’ ‘wooden,’ ‘like a form letter,’ ‘verbatim,’ ‘word for word,’ or ‘practically copy and paste.’”

To me, the fact that trans teens sound like carbon-copies of each other is a sign of indoctrination. A script has been unleashed, and trans activists are repeating that script with the aim of indoctrinating its audience. We saw the same thing happen during COVID. Mainstream media repeated the script of the official COVID narrative, word for word, day in and day out. Repetition — that’s how you indoctrinate people.

Now, we also have the added pressures of corporations that view the trans agenda as a cash cow (although most who have gone that route are finding out the hard way that trans is still a tiny minority of their customer base, and the rest are not willing to encourage the fomentation of a mental health problem).

Even if corporate CEOs aren’t gung-ho about the trans agenda, many are lured in that direction because they want to optimize their corporate equality index (CEI).

That said, Littman hypothesized that ROGD may be a maladaptive coping mechanism for other underlying mental health issues or trauma. In essence, it may be a form of maladapted collective stress response. Psychology Today wrote:

“It is clear from Littman’s study that the rise of rapid-onset gender dysphoria, which seems to predominantly involve natal females, points to a complex web of social pressures, changing cultural norms, and new modes of distress and coping that warrant further investigation. For parents, educators, and clinicians alike, caution is warranted in dealing with this growing phenomenon.”

So, who benefits from this maladaptive groupthink? Primarily, that would be hospitals, doctors and surgeons conducting gender reassignment surgeries, and, of course, Big Pharma. The cost for a complete sex change costs, on average, $132,000, but can run as high as $200,000 to $300,000 by the time everything is said and done.

Dr. Robert Malone

recently calculated it would cost $102 billion to transition the current cohort of young adults (a total of 2.58 million kids, teens, and young adults between the ages of 10 and 24) who believe they’re trans. Right now, that’s an untapped market, and it’s quite clear the health care industry is chomping at the bit to get it going.

At present, insurance companies do not have to cover the cost of sex reassignment surgery, but that could soon change, as the Affordable Care Act website is actively encouraging trans people to sue for unlawful sex discrimination.

In closing, it’s worth noting that many of the same people who attacked circumcision and fought against body shaming are now promoting transgenderism, which seems to be dehumanizing to the point of self-mutilation.

In the video above, self-proclaimed feminist and investigative journalist Jennifer Bilek discusses the forces behind the trans movement and “gender-affirming medical care” for children.

In short, it’s a stepping stone in the transhumanist agenda. Ultimately, the goal is to get rid of flesh and blood bodies altogether and have our existence either within a synthetic body or as disembodied avatar in cyberspace, or both.

Turning humanity into misgendered people incapable of natural reproduction is merely a first step in that direction. Next comes the melding of man with machine and artificial intelligence. Over time, the flesh and blood part of humans will be reduced while the synthetic parts will increase.

“They want the younger generations to get comfortable with the transhumanist idea that gender is fluid and based on how you feel, rather than what you are, as well as the idea that you shouldn’t want to reproduce, because human reproduction will be outsourced to the tech industry.”

As explained by Bilek, the trans ideology promotes the idea that you can choose your gender, even though that is a biological impossibility, because that’s a steppingstone to the grander ideology that you can exist without a body altogether, in cyberspace, where you can be whomever you want.

They want the younger generations to get comfortable with the idea that gender is fluid and based on how you feel, rather than what you are, as well as the idea that you shouldn’t want to reproduce, because human reproduction will be outsourced to the tech industry.

Over the past decade, Bilek notes, the trans argument has gone from “some people are born in the wrong body,” to simply advocating for the right to augment yourself in whatever way you see fit, to add or strip yourself of whatever appendages you don’t want. According to Bilek, it’s a fetish-based cult, and seemingly rational people are buying into it, not understanding what it’s all about.

I believe the transgender movement poses a severe threat to mental, emotional and physical health, and must be counteracted by level-headed discourse. How can anyone say they’re concerned about children’s health and welfare while simultaneously promoting irreversible surgeries that will pose lifelong risks to their health and render many of them sterile?

It’s one thing to change a child’s pronouns. It’s another to cut off their breasts and penises just because they say they feel at odds with their — for now — elected gender. The very idea that a child should be allowed to decide with such lifelong implications as mutilating their sex organs is incomprehensibly negligent.

And when you consider the hidden motive behind this movement, it reinforces the anti-human, anti-humane nature of it, because children, who are our future, are being physically and psychologically sacrificed to further an ideology that seeks to destroy the human species and turn it into something it’s not.

Subscribe to Mercola Newsletter

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.