Hunter Biden INDICTED by Delaware federal court on GUN-RELATED CHARGES –

Presidential son Hunter Biden has been indicted by a federal court in Delaware on felony gun charges. On Sept. 14, the court indicted Hunter on three counts tied to possession of a firearm while using narcotics.

Two of those three counts accuse Hunter of knowingly putting false information on a form to claim that he was not using illegal drugs when he purchased a Colt Cobra .38 Special revolver from a gun dealer in Delaware in October 2018. The third count alleges that the presidential son possessed a firearm while being a person struggling with a drug addiction. (Related: REPORT: Hunter Biden hired PR firm to clean up his Wikipedia page and make him look good.)

The indictment claims that the presidential son certified on a federally mandated form “that he was not an unlawful user of, and addicted to, any stimulant, narcotic drug, and any other controlled substance, when in fact, as he knew, that statement was false and fictitious.”

Two of the counts carry maximum prison sentences of 10 years each, while the third has a maximum of five. Each count also carries a maximum fine of $250,000. This means that Hunter could face a maximum of 25 years in prison and a maximum fine of $750,000 if found guilty on all three charges.

Two of the three charges being brought against Hunter were not used in the prosecutors’ initial gun case back in July. Abbe Lowell, one of the attorneys representing Hunter, claimed in a statement that it is strange that the prosecutors are filing charges against the president’s son now but did not do so six weeks ago following a five-year investigation into this case.


“The evidence in this matter has not changed in the last six weeks, but the law has and so has MAGA Republicans’ improper and partisan interference in this process,” claimed Lowell. “Hunter Biden possessing an unloaded gun for 11 days was not a threat to public safety, but a prosecutor, with all the power imaginable, bending to political pressure presents a grave threat to our system of justice.”

Indictment comes following breakdown in plea deal talks

The historic indictment of the son of sitting President Joe Biden comes after a potential plea deal fell apart in July.

Special Counsel David Weiss, who is overseeing the case and heading the investigation, is an appointee of former President Donald Trump who was kept on as U.S. attorney for Delaware because of the sensitive and unique nature of the investigation into Hunter by the Department of Justice. Attorney General Merrick Garland named Weiss as the department’s special counsel following the breakdown of negotiations in the plea deal.

The deal would have seen Hunter plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of failing to pay his taxes in return for the prosecutors recommending probation. If Hunter had complied with the terms of the probation in two years, the felony gun charge of illegally owning a firearm while using narcotics would have been dropped.

“We believe these charges are barred by the agreement the prosecutors made with Mr. Biden, the recent rulings by several federal courts that this statute is unconstitutional, and the facts that he did not violate that law, and we plan to demonstrate all of that in court,” said Lowell.

The plea deal fell apart at the court appearance where it was expected to be finalized after the judge presiding over the case raised questions about certain details of the agreement.

“The agreements are not straightforward, and they contain some atypical provisions,” said District Judge Maryellen Noreika. She pointed out one provision in the plea agreement that could theoretically protect Hunter from other tax-related crimes committed or unearthed during the same period.

Following her questioning, Hunter changed his plea to not guilty. Noreika then gave the parties an additional 30 days to renegotiate the plea deal.

It is still unclear if prosecutors will charge Hunter for the tax evasion crimes. Weiss noted that with Noreika not agreeing to the previous plea deal, a new trial could be held against Hunter. But this new trial might have to be switched to Washington, D.C. or California, where Hunter lives, and where the tax offenses allegedly took place. He also hinted that prosecutors could bring additional charges against Hunter in the future.

Learn more about Hunter Biden and his father at

Watch this Newsmax clip explaining how Hunter Biden’s lawyers have been accused of intimidating whistleblowers from the Internal Revenue Service.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on

More related stories:

Hunter Biden’s lucrative INFLUENCE PEDDLING scheme could spell the end for “Big Guy” Joe.

Emails show Weiss, DOJ colluded to SUBVERT congressional investigation on Hunter Biden case.

CIA faces lawsuit for facilitating “Dirty 51” letter that falsely discredited Hunter Biden’s “laptop from hell” as Russian DISINFO.

Sources include:

Democrat candidate for Virginia state delegate found to have been soliciting money on adult streaming site –

Democrat candidate for Virginia state delegate found to have been soliciting money on adult streaming site

A Democratic candidate running for election in Virginia’s House of Delegates has been accused of being on an adult streaming site with her husband.

Susanna Gibson, 40, is gearing up to face her Republican opponent David Owen in the House’s Nov. 7 election. Both Gibson and Owen are vying to become the delegate for the Old Dominion’s 57th district. However, the scandalous online activities of the nurse practitioner and mother of two have added to the already closely watched political race.

Gibson and her husband had been on the adult streaming site Chaturbate, which allows users to interact with webcam models in real time in exchange for tips and tokens. The candidate reportedly had more than a dozen archived videos from her online sessions posted on September 2022, following her announcement of candidacy. However, the said videos were deleted due to an alleged violation of terms and conditions.

In particular, Gibson allegedly solicited tips from viewers in a private room – saying that she was raising money for a “good cause.” In exchange, she and her husband performed sexual acts for paying users. (Related: Son of Paul Pelosi’s “attacker” speaks out, says his father might have been a “sex slave.”)

The Democratic candidate responded to the accusations by calling the leaks an illegal invasion of privacy to humiliate her and her family, and stressed that it would neither intimidate nor silence her. “My political opponents and their Republican allies have proven they’re willing to commit a sex crime to attack me and my family because there’s no line they won’t cross to silence women when they speak up,” Gibson said.


Her lawyer Daniel Watkins suggested that individuals sharing her videos potentially violate the Old Dominion’s revenge porn law – as a Class 1 misdemeanor. “We are working closely with state and federal law enforcement,” he said.

Gibson’s immorality defended by her fellow Dems

Some Democrats and women’s groups pushed back against the allegations of “immorality” lobbed at Gibson. Democrat State Sen. L. Louise Lucas accused Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin of being behind the story leak that, according to her, “failed completely.” Lucas also called on voters to donate to Gibson’s campaign, urging them to give money toward the Democratic candidate if they were “pissed” as she was.

Defense contractor Amanda Linton echoed the state senator’s sentiments. “Anybody who looks at this knows it’s a hit job,” said Linton, who contributes $25 to Gibson’s campaign. Despite residing outside the 57th district, the defense contractor intended to donate an additional $100.

Emily’s List, an advocacy group supporting Democratic female candidates, also came to Gibson’s defense. Lauren Chou, a spokesperson for the organization, claimed that the GOP was targeting Gibson because of her women’s rights advocacy.

“Susanna originally ran for office because of the overturning of Roe and she’s been very outspoken on standing up for reproductive rights,” she said. “People are coming out in support of Susanna because they know that Republicans are coming after her because she was standing up for them.”

Democrats backing Gibson despite this scandal is not surprising, given that the party promotes grooming children in schools and other scandalous acts.

Visit for more stories about Susannah Gibson and other Democratic candidates in Virginia.

Watch InfoWars founder Alex Jones discuss the divorce of Bill and Melinda Gates over Bill’s link to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

This video is from the Mindy channel on

More related stories:

Planned Parenthood executive argues children are born “sexual,” require sex education and porn literacy.

Does Alicia Machado know that Bill Clinton forced himself upon Miss Arkansas Elizabeth Ward Gracen… while Hillary covered it up?

Exclusive video interview: New Bill Clinton sexual assault accuser goes public for the first time.

Sources include: 1 2

160 Individuals on terror list have attempted to cross into U.S. this year – ILLEGALLY, of course –

160 Individuals on terror list have attempted to cross into U.S. this year – ILLEGALLY, of course

About 160 non-United States citizens on the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB), commonly known as the terrorist watchlist, have attempted to cross into the U.S. this year, according to the Homeland Threat Assessment. The majority of these encounters occurred while these individuals were trying to enter the country illegally between official ports of entry.

This marks a notable increase compared to last year when border officials encountered roughly 100 individuals on the watchlist. The increase has alarmed officials at the Department of Homeland Security. (Related: US border crisis persists: Thousands of migrants continue to cross daily despite the summer heat.)

The annual assessment cited a record number of migrant arrivals as a significant complicating factor for border and immigration security over the past year. The report also highlights the expectation of continued high numbers of migrant encounters in the upcoming year.

This expectation is driven by factors such as the persistent motivations for migration to the U.S. and potential growing frustration with the limited availability of legal immigration pathways.

However, the report also raises concerns about the possibility of terrorists and criminal actors exploiting this heightened flow and the increasingly complex security environment to gain entry into the United States.

Homeland Security officials emphasized that every individual encountered at the border undergoes rigorous biometric and biographic screening and vetting.

Customs and Border Protection has also expanded its information-sharing agreements with international partners to enhance its ability to prevent, detect and investigate various crimes, including human trafficking.


The report tried to downplay the issue, noting that encounters with known or suspected terrorists at the Southern Border are extremely rare, representing significantly less than 0.01 percent of total encounters annually in recent years.

It added that these encounters may involve individuals who are not themselves known or suspected terrorists but may have associations with individuals on the watchlist, including family members.

Increase in encounters with watchlisted individuals linked to surge in travelers from Eastern Hemisphere

The report linked the increase in encounters with individuals on TSDB to the soaring number of travelers from the Eastern Hemisphere coming to the U.S. over the past year.

This surge in travelers from regions where terrorism is a concern has necessitated additional processing and repatriation resources. Individuals can end up on the watchlist because of their associations with known watchlisted individuals or their direct involvement in terrorist activities.

This underscores a broader trend of individuals from conflict zones worldwide seeking to migrate to the Western Hemisphere, ultimately targeting the United States.

In addition to the concerns related to terrorism, the report anticipates that the threat of domestic terrorism will remain high but unchanged in 2024.

It also identifies illicit drugs produced and imported from Mexico as the primary threat to American lives.

It’s important to note that Border Patrol officials have reported a growing number of people on the Federal Bureau of Investigation‘s terror watchlist encountered not only at the southern border but also at the northern border.

TSDB contains sensitive information on known or suspected terrorists and individuals who represent a potential threat to the United States. When individuals on this list are encountered at the border, they may be detained, removed or turned over to another agency for detention or law enforcement action if necessary.

However, it’s worth noting that most individuals on the terrorist watchlist are still permitted to fly within the U.S., with only a small subset placed on the “No Fly” list, a decision made exclusively by government agencies.

Visit for more related stories.

Watch this video that talks about terrorists crossing U.S. border.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on

More related stories:

This needs to STOP! Tax dollars are being used to fund ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION across America.

NYC Mayor Adams: Illegal immigration under Biden has become a NATIONAL CRISIS.

BORDER DEFENSE: America protects US-Mexico border with barbed wire and verbal warnings.

Sources include:

California passes new law establishing fast-food minimum wage of $20/hour, McDonald’s to spend $250,000 more per restaurant per year –

California passes new law establishing fast-food minimum wage of $20/hour, McDonald’s to spend $250,000 more per restaurant per year

The California legislature just passed a new bill to require all major fast-food chains throughout the state to pay their employees at least $20 per hour – and McDonald’s, the world’s largest fast-food chain with 40,100 stores worldwide, is really angry about it.

The passage of Assembly Bill 1228, which is now on its way to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk, “will result in a devastating financial blow to California McDonald’s franchises at a projected annual cost of $250,000 per McDonald’s restaurant,” responded the National Owners Association to the bill’s passage.

According to the legislators behind AB 1228, the bill only affects the “rich” fast-food places that have more than 60 locations nationwide. This is technically true, though it will likely inadvertently affect small fast-food chains or individual family-owned restaurants because employees will choose to apply and work at McDonald’s for $20 an hour versus making far less at theirs.

“Small restaurants will be forced to raise their wages, too, just to get workers,” is how one report put it.

(Related: The more minimum wage increases, the more businesses will try to replace them with artificial intelligence [AI] robots.)

California really wants fast-food chains to pay their employees higher wages

Another thing AB 1228 does is create an entirely new government office comprised of a 10-member council that will govern the implementation and enforcement of its provisions.

In its first draft, AB 1228 would have allowed the California government to fine major corporations in the event that franchise operators in the state skirt or ignore the law. That provision was removed, but head corporations like McDonald’s are still upset.


The new $20 minimum wage requirement is set to go into effect immediately, followed by even more increases to occur from 2025 through 2029.

Contention over the new legislation reached a fever pitch after the California legislature pushed through the FAST Act earlier this year, which is even worse for the state’s restaurant industry.

“The bill was so egregious that the industry banded together and demanded changes as well as representation in the negotiations, instead of it being left to the rapacious unions and the left-wing legislature to craft the thing unbidden,” one report explains.

The aim of the FAST Act is to increase California’s minimum wage to $25 per hour, and there was a lot of fury after it was revealed that the campaign to pass it was, ironically, only paying canvassers $15 per hour.

After the FAST Act was passed, McDonald’s U.S. President Joe Erlinger wrote a public letter calling it “lopsided” and “ill-considered.” Erlinger further blasted California lawmakers for not treating all restaurants equally and instead only targeting national chains like McDonald’s.

It turns out that the FAST Act is now on the chopping block with the strong possibility that it will be repealed and replaced, and waiting in the wings was AB 1228 to take its place.

The new AB 1228 requires that four members of the 10-member committee be representatives from the fast-food industry, as well as four union members. Previously, there were no such requirements that the fast-food industry be represented on the committee.

“I certainly wouldn’t say it’s catastrophic, and certainly not as bad as it could have played out over the next year or two,” commented Mark Kalinowski, CEO of Kalinowski Equity Research.

At a time when the U.S. economy is already teetering on the edge, the passage of AB 1228, which is likely to be signed into law by Newsom, will only further accelerate the collapse of the system as we currently know it.

The latest news about the escalating economic crisis and what comes next as the fallout from it can be found at

Sources for this article include:

$21 TRILLION Looted from US Treasury Coffers Between 1998-2015, More Since

ILLUSTRATION: via Silver Bear Cafe

Every man, woman and child in America is owed $65,000 from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), according to a report published earlier this year by Michigan State University professor and economist Mark Skidmore.

Working with graduate students and former HUD Assistant Secretary Catherine Austin Fitt, Skidmore and his audit team uncovered $21 trillion in unauthorized spending within HUD and DOD between 1998 and 2015. Their published research is available here: “DOD and HUD Missing Money: Supporting Documentation for $21 Trillion of Undocumentable Adjustments ($65,000 Per Person).”

In accounting terms, the missing money is referred to as “undocumentable adjustments.” When abused to a gross degree, it becomes a euphemism for theft and fraud. HUD/DOD’s “adjustments” lends new meaning to the Winter Watch term “Crime Syndicate.” This loot is so monumental that even the term “Crime Syndicate” might not do it justice.

Also revealed in the research was gross violations of financial reporting laws by the U.S. government since 1998, the same year money started flooding the coffers of hedge funds that have soared ever since.

Hedge fund assets over the period in question.

Among the mainstream media, it appears only Forbes ran an article, with Boston University economics professor Laurence Kotlikoff covering the story. This professor disclosed government agency attempts to hide evidence and suppress the information.

On October 5, 2017 we discovered that the link to the report “Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or Supported” had been disabled. Within a several days, the links to other OIG documents we identified in our search were also disabled. The sequential non-random nature of this disabling process suggests a purposeful decision on the part of OIG to make key documents unavailable to the public via the website.

Professor Skidmore also disclosed attempts to shut down his project.

I have been able to talk to a few people. I tried calling the Congressional Budget Office. I talked with somebody at the GAO, and one or two people at the Office of the Inspector General, who were generating these reports. … It’s a big question in why don’t people want to look at this? Some high ranking government official also authorized the disabling of all the links to the key documents.  We know that.

I know, for example, that some activities, just for the sake of protection of the people involved in national security, have to be black budget. There is always stuff like that. Usually, it’s authorized spending, and some percentage is this black budget where only a small percentage of people and some in Congress know about it, but this is way outside of that.

The following summarizes the findings of the researchers.

The result, according to the report, is that data used to prepare the year-­end financial statements were unreliable and lacked an adequate audit trail. The report indicates that just 170 transactions accounted for $2.1 trillion in year — end unsupported adjustments. No information is given about these 170 transactions. In addition, many thousands of transactions with unsubstantiated adjustments were, according to the report, removed by the Army.

There is no explanation concerning why they were removed nor their magnitude. The July 2016 report states, “In addition, DFAS (Defense Finance and Accounting Service) Indianapolis personnel did not document or support why DDRS (The Defense Department Reporting System) removed at least 16,513 of 1.3 million feeder file records during the Third Quarter.”

Catherine Fitts in the following blockbuster interview with Professor Skidmore called the operation a massive criminal enterprise. She indicated this is likely a replay of the takedown of Soviet Union playbook. Her theory is that the endgame is a big economic bust and a Washington Consensus privatization, which has been WWs theory as well. It is quite obvious that the massive scamdemic black hole spending is an extension of this looting.

1907 Panic, Haves and Have-Nots Template in Play

The Skidmore-Fitts conversation is difficult to locate and of course has been scrubbed from You Tube. I managed to locate a copy.

Of course, this type of skulduggery is not entirely new. Just one day before 9/11, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, perhaps as foreshadowing, announced $2.3 trillion was unaccounted for in the DOD budget. In the aftermath of 9/11, Rumsfeld’s announcement was ignored and the big looting operation, by all indications, went into overdrive.

Dual Israeli-American Rabbi Dov S. Zakheim was Under Secretary of Defense and Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001, to March 10, 2004. He was in place during 9/11. He never accounted for the missing $2.3 trillion. On May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at Booz Allen Hamilton. He also worked closely with DARPA, another major financial black hole. For more on Zakheim’s career and background see’s report.

More details and mechanisms from Catherine Fitts on how the black budget looting works:

During Zakheim’s tenure as Pentagon controller, over $3 trillion dollars was unaccounted for. Additionally, military information was jeopardized and military contractors billed the U.S. for Israeli military spending: $50 million for fighter jets were rated as “surplus,” for example, and the list goes on. As the scandal of trillions surfaced, Zakheim resigned and Israel was handed the finest fighter jets in the U.S.’ inventory. Meanwhile, 15% of U.S. jets were grounded for a lack of parts.

One of the dark cards played are contract fees to fund development. Since these programs are often cancelled, those fees are paid off. Is this yet another black hole?

It behooves us to ask the obvious questions: Who manages the DOD and who is accountable? Inquiring minds would like to know. What is the background of all this “talent”?

A snapshot during the early Obama administration reveals it in spades. Of the 111 U.S. Defense Department senior officials, 40 were Jewish or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 36%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Defense Department senior officials by a factor of 1800%. A similar perusal should be done on Christian evangelical Zionists in the DOD. Quite the hat trick. Under Trump and Biden this make up in departments has continued and grown by adding large numbers of foreign born and first generation apparatchiks.

Read “Rockefeller Foundation: Hardly a Gentile White to be Found”

Who are the Likely Looters?

‘Is it really necessary for every economist to be brain-dead apologist for the rich and powerful and predatory, in every damn breath?’ — Bruce Wilder in comments to ‘Clash of Autonomy and Interdependence’

Follow the money. Starting in 1997, there were approximately 350 billionaires globally. That number is now about 1,400. Pre-pandemic the worth of these individuals has increased from $300 billion to $2.2 trillion- and then nearly doubled again. Read: U.S. Billionaire Wealth Surged by 70 Percent, or $2.1 Trillion, During Pandemic.

This is without doubt under-reported and most of the funnel flows to the very top of this tier. The second chart below shows the locales of the world’s ultra wealthy. The vast majority, about 55,000, are located in U.S. By far, the U.S. has the highest concentration of rent seeking plutocrats. It’s Crime Syndicate Central. Few plutocrats got where they are without being involved, directly or compartmentalized. Fitts mentioned the same compromised control system we have alluded to on the pages of Winter Watch. Everything about this reinforces our theories — except even we underestimated the sheer magnitude.

Kleptocrats have entire networks working below them in a power infrastructure. Such a network is expensive to maintain, which suggests a large measure of the looted $21 trillion is utilized to support it.

Another filter for spotting kleptocrats is identifying those who need to hide their money in offshore entities. Many were revealed by ICIJ in what was dubbed “The Panama Papers.”

Neoliberal Trotskyism

Neoliberalism is essentially Trotskyism refashioned for the needs of the global financial kleptocracy. But instead of “proletarians of all countries I unite” we have “neoliberal elites of all countries unite.

The term “neoliberalism” itself is obscured and hidden from the population, and its discussion is a taboo in neoliberal MSM.

They also pervert the idea of the Rule of the Law, which animated so much of modernity. Today, there’s the hollowing out of democratic practices and institutions, while at the same time catalyzing radical, brutal neo-feudal forms of kleptocratic dominance.

They are hard at work with internet censorship and are even beta testing behavioral enforcements aka mandates. This is typical of useful idiots of the kleptocracy or kakistocracy: Trotskyite neoliberals and their fellow travelers Trotskyite Marxists. Political pressure and money create an environment in which intellectually bankrupt and inverted ideas prevail.

Read “Firebrand Bolshevik Leon Trotsky: Fully Backed by International Banksters and the Pederast British War Party”

Note for newer readers: I use the terms kleptocracy, kakistocracy and Crime Syndicate interchangeably. CS is employed when I am describing actual acts. I avoid use of the word “elites” to describe this organized criminality.

It’s “socialism for corporations, feudalism for everybody else” who adapted a large part of Trotskyism ideology and, especially, political instruments, carefully hiding the origins.

The key goal of Trotskyite neoliberalism is redistributing and concentrating wealth to the top at the expense of the working class and middle class – and future generations.

Neoliberalism is totally artificially constructed and explicitly planned to be enforced on unsuspecting people via subversive actions of a totalitarian sect. In the same way Bolshevism was the dictatorship of the Communist Party nomenklatura, neoliberalism is the dictatorship of the financial Kleptocracy.

Instead of the misplaced term Communist International we see the formation of the powerful Transnational Kleptocrat International. 

The Transnational Kleptocrat aka Crime Syndicate no longer feels in the same boat as the rest of the society and openly worships on the altar of unlimited, pathological greed. As cosmopolitans, they have little loyalty or offer no support to host nations. The kleptocrats of today are bound to their corporations, and to their in-groups. This overwhelms and decimates all other considerations such as patriotism and moral obligations. Amorality is the norm. People outside the Crime Syndicate in-group are just tools, not compatriots and their standard of living means nothing.

Like Trotskyism in the past, it’s a militant and dogmatic faith that ostracizes heretics and utilizes the full power of propaganda to brainwash the population. Neoliberals have zero tolerance for other social systems or deviations from so-called Washington consensus. The kakistocratic intellectual class demands political correctness and advocates a pseudo-radical wedge agenda.

There is the creation, notably, of neoliberal “newspeak,” which is similar to Marxist newspeak. For example, the word “free” is redefined as “unregulated.” That helps to provide a pseudo-scientific justification for redistributing wealth upward and increasing poverty for the lower 90% or so of the population endemic to the system.

Neoliberals, like Trotskyites, are globalists par excellence who dream about a worldwide neoliberal revolution. Their primary method of doing business (much illegal) is via foundations and so-called non-governmental organizations (NGO). The foundations, in turn, work through captured intelligence agencies.

The neoliberal state always evolves into the national security state.

This doctrine was artificially constructed by bribed compromised intellectuals/made men and a network of foundation-funded neoliberal think tanks. The use of the term “think tank” as the major weapon for unleashing neoliberal tyranny was also a direct borrowing from Bolshevik practice.

Neoliberal Trotskyite doctrine is built and enforced by “The Party.” The Party hides behind a contrived left-right dialectic and circus clown world politics. Both the GOP (Rinos and Trump) and Demonrats are hardcore neoliberals and for all practical purposes are “The Party”.

The Party is Machiavellian and uses cult style methods. There is an obsessive preoccupation with getting to power and staying in power, but any means, criminal if necessary. Instincts are psychopathic. There is blatant disregard to fact and truth in order to achieve a political victory. They view political activities as a war and fight to the bitter end. False flags and bamboozle staged deception operations are the norm. Wedge issues are the centerpiece of policy. There is adherence to big lies.

The Kakistocrat Party is too preoccupied with dividing spoils among friends and corporate sponsors to effectively govern. High positions are populated with revolving-door flying monkeys with ideologically correct views — but who have zero, or near-zero, abilities to perform (“subzeros” or negative selection).

For Further Reading

What You Need to Know About the Latest COVID Jab Rollout

latest covid jab rollout

  • The U.S. government is rolling out a new COVID shot this fall that is recommended for all people, including those who have not taken the initial series

  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has “approved” the reformulated shots by Pfizer and Moderna for individuals 12 years of age and older, and “authorized” them under emergency use for children between the ages of 6 months and 11 years

  • The new shots are formulated to include a single mRNA corresponding to the Omicron variant XBB.1.5., the dominant variant in the U.S. for most of 2023, but which has since been replaced by other variants

  • The FDA anticipates the COVID jab will be updated once a year going forward, just like the seasonal flu vaccine

  • Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has denounced mask and vaccine mandates, saying any renewal of such federal mandates will not be enforced in Florida, now or in the future

Visit Mercola Market


As you’ve likely heard by now, the U.S. government is rolling out a new COVID shot

this fall that is recommended for all people, including those who have not taken the initial series.

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,

the reformulated shots by Pfizer and Moderna are “approved” for individuals 12 years of age and older, and “authorized under emergency use” for children between the ages of 6 months and 11 years.

This despite the fact that no emergency declaration exists to warrant it. The federal COVID-19 public health emergency declaration ended May 11, 2023.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s advisory panel has not yet announced its official recommendations,

but per the FDA:

  • Individuals 5 years of age and older, regardless of previous COVID jab status, will be eligible to receive a single dose of the reformulated shot. Those who have received previous shots should wait at least two months since the last dose.

  • Children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years who have previously received one or more COVID shots will be eligible to receive one or two doses of the updated jab, depending on the last injection received.

  • Unjabbed children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years will be eligible to receive three doses of the updated Pfizer shot or two doses of the updated Moderna jab.

The new shots are formulated to include a single mRNA corresponding to the Omicron variant XBB.1.5., the dominant variant in the U.S. for most of 2023, but which has since been replaced by other variants.

As explained by the FDA, they anticipate the COVID jab will be updated once a year going forward, just like the seasonal flu vaccine, which, by the way, is notoriously ineffective due to mismatched strains. Will the reformulated shot be any safer or more effective than the previous ones? I doubt it. As noted by the FDA:

“The updated mRNA vaccines are manufactured using a similar process as previous formulations …

[The] extent of neutralization observed by the updated vaccines against currently circulating viral variants causing COVID-19, including EG.5 and BA.2.86, appears to be of a similar magnitude to the extent of neutralization observed with prior versions of the vaccines against corresponding prior variants against which they had been developed to provide protection.

This suggests that the vaccines are a good match for protecting against the currently circulating COVID-19 variants. The benefit-risk profile of previously authorized and approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is well understood as these vaccines have been administered to hundreds of millions of people in the United States.”

Those familiar with the evidence will of course realize that, a) previous shots have been woefully ineffective, offering minimal protection at best, and only for a short time, and b) the benefit-to-risk profile is “well-understood” to be markedly skewed toward “high risk” and “minimal benefit” for most people.

Adults 60 and over are also encouraged to get the flu shot and/or a vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) concomitant with the COVID jab to prevent a “tripledemic.” Pregnant women are also encouraged to get all of these shots, which really ought to be considered a crime at this point.

As for cost, the updated COVID shots will have a price tag between $110 to $130 per dose. The flu shot will cost anywhere from $20 to $70, depending on the vaccine you get, and the RSV vaccine is predicted to run anywhere between $180 and $295.

All three shots are covered by private insurance, Medicaid and Medicare, but for the uninsured, getting all three could get costly.

As expected, Pfizer and Moderna are also spinning the same old weave, claiming the reformulated shots are “effective” against several Omicron strains, including XBB.1.5, BA.2.86 (nicknamed Pirola), EG.5 (Eris) and FL.1.5.1 (Fornax).

Interestingly, they’re not bragging about percentages this time. Instead, we’re simply being told the shots are “significantly effective” or just “effective,” whatever that means.

Remember when Pfizer and Moderna claimed their shots were 95% effective and had no serious safety concerns?

Fast-forward to February 2023 and data from the Office of National Statistics in the U.K. revealed the shots have increased all-cause mortality for all age groups while doing nothing to reduce deaths from COVID.

Pfizer documents released by the FDA in response to a lawsuit have also revealed that in the first three months of the rollout (December 2020 through the end of February 2021), Pfizer received 42,086 adverse event reports, including 1,223 deaths.

The 1976 swine flu vaccine was pulled after only 25 deaths.

We’ve also learned that Pfizer documented

no fewer than 158,000 different “side effects of special interest” in its trials, all while claiming there were no safety concerns.

The first side effect on this shockingly exhaustive list is a rare condition known as 1p36 deletion syndrome. This condition, caused by the deletion of DNA in chromosome 1p36, results in developmental delays, severe intellectual disability, seizures, vision problems, hearing loss, breathing problems, brain anomalies, congenital heart defects, cardiomyopathy, renal anomalies, genital malformation, metabolic problems and more.

Life expectancy depends on the amount of DNA that has been deleted. This, at bare minimum, sounds like something a pregnant woman might want to know before she gets the shot.

Pfizer also claimed its shot was 100% effective in children between 12 and 15,

but according to a June 2022 paper,

the vaccine effectiveness against infection in children aged 12 to 17 ended up being only 64%.

Not only did breakthrough infections occur in “fully immunized” adolescents,

we also started seeing a rise in multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS

) and myocarditis, both of which can be life threatening, whereas COVID poses a negligible risk to children, adolescents and young adults.

The bivalent boosters

were tested only on mice before they were rolled out, which tells you nothing about their safety, and effectiveness is based on antibody titers alone, which doesn’t tell you anything about effectiveness in the real world.

Moderna now claims “clinical trial data” prove their new shot is effective

against several of the strains in the Omicron lineage, but they haven’t released any details. Was it done on mice or men? Pfizer, meanwhile, admits its claims are based on mouse trials.

Considering how far off the mark they were when they were actually doing human trials, how far off do you think they’ll be when all they’re basing their claims on are mice experiments?

The fact that the FDA is refusing to provide safety data for the shots is another red flag. In January 2023, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., asked the FDA to release the results of its Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data analyses.

As previously reported by The Epoch Times, the first time the CDC ran a proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis, hundreds of signals were triggered, and more than 500 of them have a stronger safety signal than myocarditis.

The FDA has conducted a different kind of analysis, called Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining. According to former CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC’s PRR results “were generally consistent with EB data mining, revealing no additional unexpected safety signals.”

When Johnson wanted the CDC to clarify what Walensky meant by no “unexpected” safety signals, they pointed him to the FDA, which in turn told Johnson they can’t give him any data because the “FDA’s EB data mining analyses of adverse events contained in VAERS reports for COVID-19 vaccines are currently the subject of pending FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] litigation,” and that “FDA is unable to … provide information or data that is currently being considered in pending litigation.”

The litigation the FDA refers to is a lawsuit filed by Children’s Health Defense. The CHD had filed a FOIA request for the EB data, and when the agency refused, CHD sued to have them released. In a September 5, 2023, response to FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf, Johnson wrote:

“As you are well aware, Congress has a right to information contained at U.S. federal agencies as it conducts its constitutional oversight responsibilities. It is outrageous that FDA would assert that pending litigation, and particularly FOIA litigation, would allow your agency to obstruct my congressional oversight.

Any pending litigation FDA may have relating to its EB data mining records has no bearing on its responsibility to comply with a congressional request.

The notion that FDA is actively hiding information about vaccine safety signals from Congress and the American people is beyond despicable, particularly given the fact that COVID- 19 vaccine adverse events can and do occur.

According to VAERS, as of September 1, 2023, there have been 1,589,970 adverse events and 36,080 deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines.”

Johnson gave the FDA a deadline of September 19, 2023, to hand over the EB data mining results.

In a September 7, 2023, “Mandate Freedom” press conference in Jacksonville, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis denounced mask and vaccine mandates, saying any such federal mandates will not be enforced in Florida, now or in the future.

“They are trying to do this again, and here in the state of Florida, we will say ‘No,’” he said.

DeSantis called it “troubling” to see states starting to push for mask and jab mandates again when the evidence is now in. We know masks don’t work. We know the efficacy of the COVID jabs becomes negative over time and that there are serious side effects.

“They’re not trying to follow the science. They’re trying to follow a narrative. They’re trying to follow an agenda.” ~ Gov. Ron DeSantis

Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo also warned against the new COVID shots, saying there are “no clinical trials in human beings” showing that they’re safe and effective. “They actually cause cardiac injury in many people,” he said, adding that several studies have shown the shots increase your risk of contracting COVID. “There are a lot of red flags,” he said.

Indeed, there are. We now also have a clear view of how COVID was (and still is) used to usher in the idea that we need more centralization of power and social control, and that we must relinquish freedom, human rights, privacy and bodily autonomy “for the greater good.”

That’s what all the hysterical fearmongering over colds and flus is all about, so I’m grateful that Florida will not go along with this moving forward. Hopefully, leaders in other states and countries around the world will do the same, and call on their people to just say no, because that’s what it’s going to take to stop the global takeover.

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}” data-component-name=”ButtonCreateButton”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.