The director of the UN’s Human Rights Office in New York, Craig Mokhiber, has resigned, saying that the UN has surrendered to Israel and the US
Craig Mokhiber, the director of the UN’s Human Rights Office (OHCHR) in New York, has resigned from his position, blaming the organization’s inadequate handling of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The senior official asserted that the “European, ethno-nationalist, settler colonial project in Palestine has entered its final phase” and that the UN had “surrendered to the power of the US” in place of completing its job.
Mokhiber wrote to the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights Volker Turk, stating, “Once again, we are seeing a genocide unfolding before our eyes, and the Organization that we serve appears powerless to stop it.” The letter was published on Tuesday.
The official acknowledged that the term “genocide” “has often been subject to political abuse,” but nonetheless characterized the current Israeli assault in the Gaza Strip as such.
THIS IS A TEXT-BOOK CASE OF GENOCIDE. THE EUROPEAN, ETHNO-NATIONALIST, SETTLER COLONIAL PROJECT IN PALESTINE HAS ENTERED ITS FINAL PHASE, TOWARD THE EXPEDITED DESTRUCTION OF THE LAST REMNANTS OF INDIGENOUS PALESTINIAN LIFE IN PALESTINE.
In addition to simply failing to uphold their international obligations, the governments of the US, the UK, and “much of Europe are wholly complicit in the horrific assault,” according to Mokhiber, who added that they “actively arm the assault, provide economic and intelligence support, and give political and diplomatic cover for Israel’s atrocities.” He emphasized that the “cover” is further strengthened by “Western corporate media, increasingly captured and state-adjacent,” which has been “broadcasting propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial, or religious hatred, and continuously dehumanizing Palestinians to facilitate the genocide.”
Respect! The Director of the NY Office of UN High Commissioner of Human Rights just resigned: “Once again, we are seeing a genocide unfolding before our eyes, and the Organization that we serve appears powerless to stop it.” Letter below- pic.twitter.com/1S2U4QrCv1
Mokhiber thinks that throughout time, the UN has lost its “principles” and “authority,” which were based on the body’s “integrity,” such as during South Africa’s apartheid. Mokhiber pointed out that the UN has a history of failing to prevent genocides, citing the genocides in Rwanda and Bosnia, the Yazidi genocide carried out by the Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS), and the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar as examples.
“In recent decades, key parts of the UN have surrendered to the power of the US and to the fear of the Israel Lobby, to abandon these principles, and to retreat from international law itself. We have lost a lot in this abandonment, not least our own global credibility. But the Palestinian people have sustained the biggest losses as a result of our failures,” he stated.
He recommended that in order to address the issue, the UN “learn from the principled stance taken in cities around the world in recent days as masses of people stand up against the genocide, even at the risk of beatings and arrest.” Aside from that, he urged the organization to abandon the “illusory two-state solution” and support the establishment of a “single, democratic, secular state in all of historic Palestine,” which would guarantee Israel’s “dismantling” as a “deeply racist, settler-colonial project,” according to the source.
I write about COVID mitigation policies, vaccines, neurological diseases and conditions, corruption, censorship, and early treatments. The data shows that vaccines are ruining the health of Americans and driving the epidemic in neurological conditions.
The medical community and health authorities are simply inept or corrupt or both. You cannot have a 9X variation in Figure 2. That’s crazy. Any sane person would have demanded an end to the vaccine program immediately. How come everyone in mainstream medicine missed this?
Your risk of death monotonically increases from the time you get the shot, peaking at around 3 to 4 months after shot #2. For other doses, it just climbs and then plateaus.
The mortality risk curve is opposite in slope to what doctors expect (you are more likely to die later than sooner), so doctors fail to associate a death with the vaccine injection. This allows the vaccine to hide under the radar undetected.
Your risk of death increases exponentially with each shot number. For example, if your risk of death increased 5% on shot #1, it might increase another 6% on shot #2, another 9% on shot #3, 18% on shot #4, 50% on shot #5, etc. It’s like shooting yourself with a poison each time. This explains why the excess deaths keep going up worldwide even though booster adoption is going down.
Lot variation is real. Some lots kill 30X more per dose than others. How is that possible with a safe vaccine? This alone should kill the “safe and effective” narrative.
The healthy vaccine temporal effect is complete bullshit, a gaslighting technique used to explain the data. The Israeli data shown below makes that crystal clear. HVE, if it exists, should be an exponentially decaying effect like the charge curve of a capacitor.
The lack of transparency of record-level public health data allows them to keep killing people without getting caught. Nobody pushing the jabs is calling for data transparency of public health data. This is a huge red flag. This is a sign of a corrupt, out of control government. And no, you cannot FOIA this information. That has never been done anywhere, ever. Once this data is made public, it’s all over.
If the government wants to stop all the COVID vaccine misinformation instantly, the solution is to set the data free as I wrote about in the past. Why are they not doing this? Answer: Joe Biden would then have to hold himself accountable for all the Americans killed under his leadership to push the jabs.
Not a single pro-vaccine advocate is calling for data transparency of public health data. No vaccine manufacturer is calling for it either. If the vaccines really worked, the drug companies would have put it in their contracts to force the states to release the public health data so they can show people how good the product is and stop all misinformation superspreaders like me from getting any traction with the public. Instead, they seem to want all the data to be hidden for 75 years at a minimum. How is that in the public interest? That tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it?
I’m certain now that the MoH data was not gimmicked because I’ve compared it with other data where I know the provenance and it matches up (i.e., death rate on shot 2 peaks at around 100 days and is around 2x the minimum death rate). Also, if they gimmicked the data, they wouldn’t be trying to hide it behind a firewall; they’d make it public.
Here are the two key graphs from that article. Both are day till death if you most recent shot is shot #2:
You cannot have a 9X variation in bar height with a safe vaccine. Sorry. No possible way.
The medical community is ignoring this. This is unconscionable.
Figure 2 is screaming: “I am killing people. Stop me.”
Everyone looks the other way, except me. I’m the only guy in the world, AFAIK, calling this out. This is crystal clear.
People attempted to explain Fig. 2 using thing like:
The mythical healthy vaccinee effect aka HVE (the temporal type)
Seasonality (older people die at a much higher rate in the winter)
These explanations don’t fit the data:
HVE is zero. If there was any HVE, the first bar would be lower than all other bars. But the bars touch the lowest point many times in the first 30 days as can be seen from the MoH data.
Seasonality doesn’t cause death to double in 30 days as we can see above. And seasonality is never more than a 2x difference.
For comparison, here’s Dose 2 from another fully reported source where you can see how the death rate varies by month:
And here’s what happens when you add all the days to death since most recent shot into one chart:
The problem here is for Dose #1, people only spend 3 weeks there before getting Dose #2, so the first bar above should have the most deaths, about 25% more than the other 5 bars after it. This is a huge problem.
Self-controlled case series methods (SCCS) used to detect excess mortality will not work for the COVID vaccine unless the logic is reversed.
For most interventions, the side effects happen right after the intervention and then go away. For the COVID vaccines, it’s the other way around.
So conventional SCCS logic will make the COVID vaccine appear as if it is saving lives when it is actually killing people!
Simple. Doctors are expecting most deaths from a vaccine to happen shortly after injection. If you die 6 months later, it couldn’t have been the vaccine.
Now we know it’s the reverse… that it’s more likely you’ll die 3-6 months after the shot than immediately after the shot.
This is why the COVID vaccine looks so “safe.” It’s because it kills slowly with a crescendo. Doctors have no idea about the response curve (because it is kept hidden from them).
Previously, I never bothered with the “how bad is my batch” analysis because the denominator is kept secret making any conclusions subject to attack.
The reason the denominator is kept secret is to protect the public from learning the truth about how deadly the product is.
If you have a safe vaccine, the number of deaths per lot should be relatively steady.
Drug makers know some batches are 30X or more deadly than other batches, but by not disclosing the number of vials injected into arms, they can keep the public in the dark as to whether there is a safety signal or not. So that’s what they do.
After being prompted by some data I was given recently showing a more than 30X disparity between batches, I spent time on the How Bad is My Batch website and confirmed that yes, this is not an artifact, this is the real deal.
It took all of 2 minutes. That site alone is proof of enormous excess mortality. You really don’t need anything else.
Why is nobody in the mainstream medical community demanding that the lot #, injection, mortality data is made public? Why is the NY Times not writing an op-ed about this?
How does anyone explain this? You cannot have a lot variation like this with a saline shot. All the profiles should be nearly identical. These are not identical. The vaccine is unsafe.
The only reason for not disclosing this is if you are trying to kill people without being detected.
Here is a quick summary of the things that are very important for people to know right now:
This is not a safe vaccine and should be immediately pulled from the market. The vaccine is killing people. There is no doubt about it. The only reason it is still on the market is we can’t get anyone who has any authority to look at the data. They all refuse to listen.
The mortality risk is opposite to what doctors expect (you are more likely to die later than sooner), so doctors fail to associate a death with the vaccine. This allows the vaccine to hide under the radar undetected.
Your risk of death monotonically increases from the time you get each shot, peaking at around 3 to 4 months after shot #2. For other doses, it just climbs and then plateaus. For Dose #1, we don’t have sufficient records to make a call on this other than to note that it increases monotonically for the first 3 weeks and then we cannot tell without more complete record level data being released.
Your risk of death increases exponentially with each shot number. For example, if your risk of death increased 5% on shot #1, it might increase another 6% on shot #2, another 9% on shot #3, 18% on shot #4, 50% on shot #5, etc. This explains why the excess deaths keep going up worldwide even though booster adoption is going down, something we could never explain before now!
Lot variation is real. I was hesitant to make a call on this earlier because we didn’t know how many shots of each lot number are actually administered, but I’ve seen too much data from too many sources now (including Kevin McKernan’s work on the DNA plasmid adulteration) that lead to the invariable conclusion that all lots are not alike and that there is likely a factor of 30X or more variation in the deaths per dose for hot lots vs. cold lots. That is stunning. There is literally no quality control on these shots in terms of clinical outcome (they just look at things that do not determine clinical outcomes). They are even hiding the data on lot numbers and deaths from the public. There is absolutely no possible justification for not publishing, for each lot number, the # of injections and the # of deaths. If they did this one thing, it’s all over.
There is no temporal healthy vaccinee effect (HVE). If they claim that, they are gaslighting you. You can see for yourself from the Israeli data that if there is an effect, it is not measurable. It’s basically 0. Undetectable.
With a full dump of record level data, we wouldn’t have to speculate about any of this. But we have insights as to why nobody wants to release the data. They don’t even want to know themselves. At my request, Peter Baldridge just sent a FOIA to California Department of Public Health for their analysis of the data as we’ve done above, and I’m almost certain they have done absolutely nothing.
We already know for sure that the vaccines are causing huge numbers of excess deaths. The only question we don’t have answered is how bad is it really? Nobody wants to release the record level data so we can find out. I guess that’s the way they like it.
If the public ever sees the record level data, the vaccines are toast. This is why every public health authority everywhere in the world keeps these under wraps. Otherwise, the game is over, not just for the COVID vaccines, but many other vaccines, if not all of them.
To fix this problem, we need legislation.
To date, I haven’t been able to get a single lawmaker interested in forcing public health agencies to make the public health data public. Nobody is returning any of my calls. They all ignore me.
But with your support, I will not stop trying.
The one piece of good news is that this is about to change. Finally. I won’t say where in the world this is happening, but you’ll find out soon enough. It appears the drug companies do not control everything.
Truly EXCELLENT post, one of your very best. And it’s extremely important to note that the delayed mortality effect that you point out is almost exactly consistent with the Pfizer and Moderna gold-standard randomized clinical trial data. The Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials BOTH showed that almost all excess vaccine-associated deaths are delayed by least a few months. Within the first month things looked “fine”, almost no excess vaccine deaths were seen in the trials. But by 6 months, the Pfizer and Moderna trials showed 45% excess cardiovascular deaths and 16% excess non-COVID deaths overall with vaccination compared to placebo (and a net effect of “4 killed for every 3 saved”).
There are always cracks and I finally found two small ones they didn’t cover.
Or rather, they both found me to be more accurate.
Stay tuned. This can be big. Really big.
Becoming a paid subscriber for just $5/month supports our efforts to expose government corruption and get legislation passed to create transparency of public health data.
Also, I post tips to my paying subscribers that add value that is more than the subscription cost.
If you don’t think this is the case, you can always cancel at any time.
But now I have collected sufficient data from many sources to know they were lying about their interpretation. There is no HVE effect. That graph posted by Professor Levi is the real deal and is impossible to explain if the vaccines aren’t killing people.
The vaccines are deadly and I can now convince any data scientist in the world of that.
Unfortunately, no health authority in the world will look at the data; even from “gold standard” sources. They don’t want to know. It doesn’t matter how strong the signal is or how credible the data is or how much evidence we have. It doesn’t matter. They do not want to look.
So none of this matters at this point. We can’t force them to look at things they don’t want to see.
I will continue to try and I’m confident that in less than a year things will be completely different.
The SOROS EFFECT: The insidious “Merchant of Migrants” funds war and chaos around the world that sends millions of migrants straight to the USA
Business magnate and investor of “chaos” George Soros is what many would call the “head of the snake” when it comes to the money that backs chaos in countries all around the world, including the USA. At age 93 and worth nearly $10 billion dollars, Soros has the capacity, and uses it, to instigate and fuel civil wars, causing tens of millions of people to flee their home countries and head for the chance at a better, more stable life (anything to escape poverty, ruling tyranny, and chaos).
Today, Soros Fund Management, founded by George, manages nearly $50 billion in assets. For the record, Soros has pledged investments of $500 million to migrants and refugees in what is termed the “global refugee crisis.” Is it all part of the controlled demolition of the United States as we know it, and part of a larger picture where communism is the “formula” for the latest New World Order? It would appear so.
It is a pattern
Tucker Carlson recently stated on a podcast, “Start another war, send millions more anti-Western refugees to the West. Starting to notice a pattern?”
The demented Leftists running Washington D.C. are pressuring Americans to accept any and all illegal immigrants as helpless refugees from any war happening anywhere in the world, including Ukraine and Israel. What they call “terror hotspots” are where all the proxy wars take place, funded by the USA and George Soros, throwing gasoline on the fire, and causing hundreds of millions of people to be displaced and running for cover (in Biden’s Amerika where there are open borders and lots of free handouts).
The pandemic is actually the Virus of Marxism that’s spreading all over the world and America is becoming deathly “sick” with it. If you don’t accept it, you are deemed a racist, bigoted, white supremacist (even if you’re black), who hates all immigrants (even if you are one yourself) and a “Trumper.” This Neo-Marxist philosophy is being indoctrinated in every school level and all whites are being declared “institutionally racist.”
We witnessed Germany being completely overrun by illegal immigrants over the past 8 years, and we’ve seen the government there fall apart. The citizens there are fleeing in masse, with over 1.2 million applications for asylum each year. This after they first thought welcoming all refugees was the “right thing to do,” until they found that most of the refugees are military aged men who are criminals that rape women and children, rob citizens and businesses, and vote for more free stuff, and more chaos. It’s a pattern and it’s happening now in the USA. The head of THAT snake, again, is George Soros.
The insidious billionaire George Soros and the virus of Marxism
The quiet financing of a Marxist revolution in criminal justice deconstruction has been fueled and propagated by tens of millions of dollars coming from George Soros, who supports “progressive” candidates in district attorney races across the USA. From defunding the police to abolishing bail, the billionaire and “activist” attorney George Soros, funnels cash through a ” complicated web of federal and state political action committees as well as non-profits from coast to coast,” as written up in the New York Post. This helps fund “chaos,” which in turn helps break down the Republic and create the stage for the communist takeover, that’s already begun, right from the hub in Washington D.C. Meanwhile, the right arm of the Communist movement, USA’s mainstream media, covers all tracks for Soros via Google.
Yes, George Soros himself, has orchestrated dark money to create what many call his “shock and awe” campaign of terror, as World War III quickly approaches, and the United States looks more and more like a third world country ripe for the takeover. Bookmark Censored.news to your favorite websites for truth news about globalists who profit from proxy wars that push illegal immigrants to America.
Abandoned bag near the border wall in southern Texas yields ammo, homemade explosive device
American border patrol agents along the southern Texas border wall in Starr County have found a backpack loaded with ammo and a homemade explosive device, raising alarm among Republican senators questioning the border policies of the Biden administration.
On Friday, Nov. 3, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) said the abandoned bag containing a potential homemade explosive was discovered about two months ago near the border in Fronton, Texas.
Assisted by law enforcement from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), police took the device away and detonated it. The CBP classified the device as a “noise maker” as it contained flash powder.
Although flash powder was found inside the backpack, the CBP said there was no fragmentation to cause major injuries or casualties.
Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyoming), who also serves as chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, disclosed this alarming information during a press conference on October 31. He was joined by Senators John Cornyn (R-Texas), Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Pete Ricketts (R-Nebraska) following their recent visit to the U.S.-Mexico border.
These senators argued that there have been over eight million illegal border crossings during President Joe Biden’s tenure. They emphasized that the discovery of explosive devices on some border crossers in recent days significantly heightens the risk of potential terrorist acts on U.S. soil.
Barrasso described these devices as the “size of cannonballs” and suggested that they were “tailor-made for terrorism.”
Additionally, Senator Ricketts pointed out that due to what he labeled as Biden’s “failed” border policies, 18 individuals on the terrorist watchlist were apprehended while entering the U.S. illegally in September. There were 172 such cases last year.
FBI director acknowledges increased threat of terrorism on U.S. soil
The heightened terror threat facing the U.S. was also acknowledged by FBI Director Christopher Wray, who issued a stark warning while testifying before Congress on October 31. Wray highlighted the increased threat posed by “homegrown extremists” and foreign terrorist organizations calling for attacks against Americans and the West.
The rise in the terror threat has been a growing concern. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) previously issued a terror alert earlier this year, warning of a “heightened threat environment” and individuals with links to foreign terrorist organizations potentially targeting various facilities and infrastructure in the United States.
In September, there were over 269,000 individuals apprehended while illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, marking a record high for a single month. Barrasso attributed this alarming situation to the fact that Homeland Security raised the terror threat level, given the increasing number of people entering the country illegally and the significant “gotaways” who evade capture. (Related: Texas border sector reports 10K known border crossers in single week.)
According to the House Committee on Homeland Security, there have been 1.7 million “gotaways” since Biden took office.
The blame for the border crisis, according to Ricketts, falls squarely on the Biden administration, which he argued has created the crisis. He stressed the importance of restoring the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” policy as a significant step to address the situation effectively. This policy, known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), required asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for their U.S. court hearings.
In response to the latest illegal immigration data from September, the CBP deployed additional resources and vowed to remain vigilant in enforcing immigration laws. Biden, meanwhile, requested additional funding to address the border crisis, with a significant portion allocated to support Israel and Ukraine in their ongoing conflicts.
Sam Bankman-Fried found GUILTY on all charges in jury trial: “maximum sentence of 110 years in prison”
It is official: Corporate finance criminal Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was convicted on all charges by a jury this week, though the curly-headed goon will still have the chance to appeal the verdict.
We are told that if the verdict stands, SBF faces a maximum prison sentence of 110 years, with the judge having set the sentencing date for March 28, 2024.
The New York jury determined that the crypto-scammer defrauded customers, investors, and lenders with his cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme. SBF was convicted of seven charges: two counts of wire fraud and five conspiracy counts.
The 31-year-old son of two Stanford legal scholars, SBF was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud against customer of FTX and Alameda Research lenders; securities fraud and conspiracy to commit commodities fraud against FTX investors; and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Check out the cringeworthy clip below of SBF dancing in celebration of his stolen loot:
BREAKING: Crypto scammer Sam Bankman-Fried has been found guilty on all charges in his first criminal trial.
The New York jury determined Bankman-Fried defrauded customers, investors and lenders.
Should Democrats now have to pay back all of SBF’s stolen donations?
Commenting on the case was Sara Bull, a popular social media influencer, who asked a rhetorical question about whether the recipients of SBF’s stolen loot should now have to pay back what never belonged to them in the first place.
“Should Democrats have to pay back all of SBF’s stolen donations?” Bull asked on X (formerly Twitter).
In his defense, SBF tried to claim “effective altruism,” the idea being that his stolen riches were intended for “good intentions,” though it all played out “with extreme carelessness and negligence, and likely also fraud,” to quote CoinDesk.
“Today, his fortune is wiped out, and he faces criminal charges that could result in over a 100-years of jail time … All of the well-intentioned benefits he pledged have instead been replaced by terrible damage to the lives of his customers.”
It is obvious just from watching the clip above that SBF was probably not the mastermind behind the crimes he was convicted for, but is rather more of a patsy – his parents being the ones who deserve a little more probing.
More than likely, the FTX scam has ties to Ukraine, which many have speculated since the story first broke. The following image paints a picture of what is believed to have occurred, that second blue and yellow symbol representing Ukraine:
In other words, the government steals your money in the form of taxes, then sends billions of it over to Ukraine in several lump-sum payments. Ukraine then “invests” much of that money in FTX, all of this constituting money laundering.
“FTX donates huge amounts back to the Democrat Party,” further explains 100percentfedup.com about how the scam more than likely worked. “The Democrats then use that money to buy, influence, and steal elections. What a great system!”
X owner Elon Musk tweeted about all this as well, providing the following evidence pointing to the arrangements that were made:
“NOW does it make sense why billions of your tax dollars are going to Ukraine every month?”
Remember: After the FTX collapse, about $8.7 billion was owed to customers. At the same time, the Pentagon announced that an “accounting error” was responsible for an extra $6.2 billion that was sent to Ukraine – oopsie.
The latest news about the corrupt American financial system can be found at Corruption.news.
America is developing a new nuclear gravity bomb that is 24 times more powerful than Hiroshima’s atomic bomb
Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of American Scientists, explained that the B61-13 will employ the same warheads from the 1980s- and 1990s-era B61-7s, fitted into the same casing and tail kit as the B61-12.
According to the report from the Pentagon, the B61-13 nuclear gravity bomb is 24 times more powerful than the Hiroshima nuke and 14 times larger than the bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945. B61-13 is also expected to hold a maximum load of 360 kilotons, like B61-7, with the same modern safety, security and accuracy features as B61-12. Moreover, this bomb provides additional options against harder and larger-area military targets.
“What makes this so dangerous is that Xi [Jinping] and [Vladimir] Putin are collaborating in new ways to threaten the U.S. alliance architectures, systems of trade, and safe and secure commerce – all of which have allowed Americans to be safe, prosperous, and free for decades,” said Rebeccah Heinrichs, a senior fellow with the Hudson Institute and an expert on strategic deterrence.
Russia and China’s strategic partnership challenges U.S. dominance in nuclear competition
In a report published by Fox News in March, Russian and Chinese diplomats have been conducting meetings to reaffirm their strategic partnership. Now, experts believe that those meetings seek to challenge the U.S. dominance, not only in their respective regions but on the global stage.
“Russia and China are strategic partners in the short term as they are joining forces to challenge the U.S. in order to deter us from interdicting their respective plans to establish dominance in their respective perceived spheres of influence in Eurasia,” explained former Intelligence officer Rebekah Koffler. “In the long term, Moscow and Beijing are strategic opponents; hence, they’ve been modernizing their nuclear arsenals and doctrines.”
Koffler pointed out that Russia has the largest nuclear stockpile globally, even more extensive than the U.S. when including tactical nuclear weapons. While China’s nuclear capabilities remain secret, some experts think the U.S. might not be able to stop Putin from using tactical nuclear weapons.
Moreover, Koffler said the so-called Global Zero policy under the Obama and Biden administrations might have given Russia a way to prevent the U.S. from getting involved in the Ukraine war, as they fear Putin might use nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
Heinrichs hinted that a renewed focus on producing “large numbers of conventional weapons and defenses” is necessary.
“We have divested of key systems and production capabilities since the Cold War, and we must now move with a sense of urgency to regain our ability to produce and deploy the necessary weapons to deter both of those countries. To return to a stable environment where both of those countries are interested in diplomacy and treaties, and agreements, we should show them that they will not prevail by threatening us with nuclear weapons. It will not be worth it for them,” Heinrichs said.
However, the production of the B61-13 will be limited and is only intended to replace some of the existing B61-7 bombs without increasing the overall weapons stockpile to 400–500. It plans to offset the production of B61-12s with an equivalent number of B61-13s.