Auto dealers urge Biden to step on the brakes for ELECTRIC CAR mandates, citing decline in demand – NaturalNews.com

Auto dealers urge Biden to step on the brakes for ELECTRIC CAR mandates, citing decline in demand

Almost 4,000 automotive dealers called on the Biden administration to “tap the brakes” on its electric vehicle (EV) mandate, citing a drop in demand for electric cars.

The group of 3,882 dealers – under the aegis of EV Voice of the Customer – wrote an open letter to President Joe Biden, which was published online. It asked the chief executive to “slow down … proposed regulations mandating battery EV production and distribution.”

According to the letter, the Biden administration “has proposed regulations that would essentially mandate a dramatic shift to battery EVs.” This would increase “year after year until 2032 when two out of every three vehicles sold in America” would have to run on electricity.

“Currently, there are many excellent battery EVs available for consumers to purchase. The reality, however, is that EV demand today is not keeping up with the large influx of [electric cars] arriving at our dealerships, prompted by the current regulations. [Battery EVs] are stacking up on our lots.”

The group pointed out that while “there was a lot of hope and hype” about EVs in 2022, that enthusiasm has largely fizzled out. “The supply of unsold battery EVs is surging, as they are not selling nearly as fast as they are arriving at our dealerships – even with deep price cuts, manufacturer incentives and generous government incentives,” it continued. (Related: Automakers slashing EV prices after government subsidies fail to prop up the industry.)

“While the goals of the regulations are admirable, they require consumer acceptance to become a reality. With each passing day, it becomes more apparent that this attempted EV mandate is unrealistic based on current and forecast consumer demand. Already, EVs are stacking up on our lots which is our best indicator of customer demand in the marketplace.”

Customers are simply not ready to make the change

In 2021, Biden signed an executive order mandating that 50 percent of vehicles sold in the U.S. should run on electric power by 2030. “There’s no turning back. The question is [whether] we will lead or fall behind in the race for the future,” he said at the time.

“The push to get automakers to offer fewer and fewer gas-burning vehicles comes as the Biden administration has struggled to secure the massive federal investments in EV infrastructure that experts say is needed to make it viable for Americans on a wide scale,” NBC News reported.

“Biden … called for $174 billion in federal spending to build a network for a half-million electric vehicle charging stations across the country, in a nod to one of the biggest impediments to EV adoption: Fear of running out of battery. But the bipartisan infrastructure deal he reached with Congress included just $7.5 billion for that priority.”

Nevertheless, EV Voice of the Customer pointed out that “the majority of customers are simply not ready to make the change.”

“They are concerned about BEVs being unaffordable. Many do not have garages for home charging or easy access to public charging stations. Customers are also concerned about the loss of driving range in cold or hot weather. Some have long daily commutes and don’t have extra time to charge the battery. Truck buyers are especially put off by the dramatic loss of range when towing. Today’s current technology is not adequate to support the needs of the majority of our consumers.”

The group ultimately exhorted Biden to “tap the brakes” on his administration’s “unrealistic” EV mandate.

“Allow time for the battery technology to advance; allow time to make battery EVs more affordable; allow time to develop domestic sources for the minerals to make batteries; [and] allow time for the charging infrastructure to be built and prove reliable. And most of all, allow time for the American consumer to get comfortable with the technology and make the choice to buy an EV.”

Visit GreenTyranny.news for more stories about the Biden administration’s EV mandate.

Watch Laura Ingraham of Fox News expound on the failures of Biden’s EV mandate below.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Rise of EVs is driving more demand for electricity as grid power generation declines.

EV owners complain about “logistical nightmare” caused by lack of charging stations.

In appeal to auto workers, Trump warns that Biden’s EV mandates will lead to fewer well-paying jobs.

EV NIGHTMARE: Man spends 15 hours to travel 178 miles, proving EVs are unsuitable for long-distance travel.

GOING DARK: New York City lacks energy infrastructure needed to power Uber and Lyft EVs or reach 2030 zero-emissions mandate.

Sources include:

ZeroHedge.com

EVVoiceOfTheCustomer.com

NBCNews.com

Brighteon.com

Ireland proposes radical anti-hate speech law that would make memes and common phrases illegal, such as “Irish Lives Matter” – NaturalNews.com

Ireland proposes radical anti-hate speech law that would make memes and common phrases illegal, such as “Irish Lives Matter”

The conservative government of Ireland is proposing anti-hate speech laws in the wake of widespread anti-immigration protests in the capital of Dublin that could criminalize the possession of certain memes and the uttering of the phrase “Irish Lives Matter.”

On Nov. 23, an Algerian immigrant who had obtained Irish citizenship over two decades ago stabbed three children and a schoolteacher outside of their school in Dublin. The suspect’s identity spread and resulted in protests and rioting all over Dublin that ended up destroying 11 police vehicles, damaging 13 shops and looting dozens of stores. Protesters clashed with police, and at least 34 people were arrested.

In response to the protests, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar, whose father Ashok is an Indian immigrant, said that his conservative coalition government would modernize the country’s hate speech laws. (Related: Ireland going full woke, plans to criminalize possession of materials deemed “hateful” by authorities.)

“I think it’s now very obvious to anyone who might have doubted us, that our incitement to hatred legislation is just not up to date,” said Varadkar. “It’s not up to date for the social media age, and we need that legislation through.”

“And we need it through in a matter of weeks because it’s not just the platforms that have a responsibility here – and they do – it’s also the individuals who post messages and images online that stir up hatred and violence,” he added. “We need to be able to use laws to go after them immediately.”

Bill expands power of Irish government to prosecute people who supposedly spread “hate speech”

The proposed legislation, titled the Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offenses) Bill 2022, was first introduced in November 2022 and was delayed due to public outcry. Now, it is being reintroduced and is currently making its way through the Irish Parliament.

If enacted, the bill would prohibit the incitement to violence or “hatred against a person or group of persons” based on “certain characteristics,” including race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, national or ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation and disabilities.

The bill allows judges to issue search warrants for alleged violators’ property if law enforcement can present sufficient evidence of their involvement in instances of hate speech. This includes the authority to search and seize the belongings of alleged perpetrators and their families, including electronic devices.

The scope of the bill provides the Irish government with the power to declare people in violation of the law if they prepare or possess “material that is likely to incite violence or hatred against a person or a group of persons on account of their protected characteristics … with a view to the material being communicated to the public or a section of the public, whether by himself or herself or another person.”

Critics of the proposal warn that individuals could be charged because they posted so-called “reckless” comments on social media or even if they share memes on the basis that these comments or memes allegedly incite violence or hatred. Furthermore, the Irish government could even use this bill to claim that certain statements or phrases are illegal because they can lead to violence or further hatred.

The bill is also a response to messages that have circulated in Ireland in the wake of the stabbing and protests that read “Irish Lives Matter,” an adaptation of the phrase “All lives matter,” which itself is a reaction to the rise of the statement “Black Lives Matter” and the movement it spawned in the United States.

The government is now investigating the use of the phrase “Irish Lives Matter,” with police deeming the phrase a “hate crime.”

Learn more about attempts by governments around the world to regulate speech at SpeechPolice.news.

Watch this video from John Williams discussing the protests that have engulfed Dublin, warning that the United States could be next.

This video is from the ThisIsJohnWilliams channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

“We are restricting freedom … for the common good:” Irish Green Party calls for limiting free speech.

Ireland wanted public input on proposed censorship bill… until the majority said they actually prefer free speech.

Irish lawmakers to pass “Hate Speech” law that fines and jails people for possessing “hateful content” on their personal devices.

Ireland under attack: Hordes of violent migrants brawl in their taxpayer luxury hotel, mass stabbings and arrests.

Erin go Britain? Ireland considers enacting a bill criminalizing the possession of hateful material.

Sources include:

Revolver.news

TheMessenger.com

Newsweek.com

SAN.com

Brighteon.com

Rhode Island Black Lives Matter leader ENDORSES TRUMP, accuses Dems of being RACISTS – NaturalNews.com

Rhode Island Black Lives Matter leader ENDORSES TRUMP, accuses Dems of being RACISTS

A former prominent Black Lives Matter activist in Rhode Island has publicly announced his support for former President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election.

Mark Fisher, a former Democrat turned independent voter who co-founded Rhode Island’s Black Lives Matter branch, endorsed Trump during an interview on “Fox & Friends,” in a segment wherein he discussed why Democrats and President Joe Biden are losing the support of Black voters. (Related: INSANITY: Democrat-run city in Missouri rewards BLM protesters, violent leftist rioters with up to $150,000 each.)

“It’s the duplicity of the Democrats, the hypocrisy,” said Fisher to host Lawrence Jones. “We’re not stupid. The brothers are not stupid. We understand when someone’s for us and when someone is not, and it’s obvious that the Democratic Party is not for us.”

At a different interview earlier in November, Fisher argued that Democrats “don’t value” African Americans, and that their policies “actually strike at the heart of the Black family.”

“We’ve been used and abused for so long by that party. They don’t value our vote,” he said. “Their policies are basically racist policies. I believe it’s a racist party. Donald Trump is just the opposite. He’s going to tell you how it is. He’s going to give it to you straight.”

“Trump has done more for the Black community than any president I can think of in my lifetime,” he added.

Many Black Americans “misinformed” about Trump

Speaking of Trump on “Fox & Friends,” Fisher argued that a lot of Black Americans who are still registered Democrats or regularly vote for Democrats are “misinformed” about the former president and his policies.

“They don’t really understand because they don’t educate themselves on Donald Trump as a person and his history,” said Fisher, who went on to say that he personally “loves the man.”

“How could you not like a real man?” he said. “How could you not relate to someone like that?’

Fisher argued that if Black Americans do the work of educating themselves regarding Trump and his policy proposals for uplifting all Americans, he believes more and more will come to his side and vote for the former president.

Speaking of Biden, Fisher described him as a “deep disappointment,” adding that he feels Biden’s tenure as president is itself the reason why so many Black Americans feel disaffected and are abandoning the Democrats.

“I think that it will happen on its own, and it’ll be organic,” he said. “I feel like the tide is starting to turn… I feel like a lot of Black people are starting to pivot off of that Democratic plantation. For so long, we’ve been slaves to that party. Actually, we’ve been mental slaves afraid to get off of that plantation.”

BLM disavows Mark Fisher

Fisher’s endorsement of Trump has been met with outrage. Black Lives Matter Rhode Island co-founder Gary Dantzler claimed he is “disgusted” by Fisher’s remarks, which he described as a major setback for everything the movement supposedly stands for.

“You have good, you have bad and you have evil,” said Dantzler. “Mark Fisher says he represents Black Lives Matter, but he does not represent Black Lives Matter.”

The Black Lives Matter Rhode Island Political Action Committee also condemned Fisher’s endorsement, with spokesperson Harrison Tuttle claiming that Fisher “has never been affiliated” with the organization.

Meanwhile, Joe Powers, chairman of the Republican Party of Rhode Island, described Fisher’s endorsement as a “major win” for Republicans in New England.

“It’s good to hear that we have compatriots who are looking to the Republicans as an answer,” said Powers. “It’s refreshing to hear that you have people who would not normally go that way, actually comes to the realization that it’s the smart move – it makes sense to be a Republican in Rhode Island.”

Watch this Fox News interview of Black Lives Matter Rhode Island co-founder Mark Fisher expressing his support for Trump’s 2024 presidential run.

This video is from the GalacticStorm channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

RFK Jr. to support reparations for Black American community by means of targeted government-funded programs, not cash giveaways.

Prominent Atlanta “Stop Cop City” BLM leader arrested in violent hit-and-run involving stolen vehicle, multiple injured.

94% of nearly 325,000 new S&P 100 jobs following BLM protests went to NON-WHITES, study finds.

Portland business owner who supported Antifa and BLM riots shuts down taproom due to significant financial losses.

Sources include:

WesternJournal.com

FoxNews.com

WPRI.com

Brighteon.com

Replenishing the population: Putin wants Russian women to have MORE CHILDREN to replace war casualties – NaturalNews.com

Replenishing the population: Putin wants Russian women to have MORE CHILDREN to replace war casualties

Russian President Vladimir Putin is demanding that his country’s women have more children to boost the population.

He made this remark during a video call at the World Russian People’s Council on Nov. 28. The Russian leader argued that women having more children were necessary to prevent “catastrophic demographic problems” that could impact Russia’s economy down the line.

“Many of our people maintain the tradition of the family where four, five, or more children are raised. Recall that in Russian families, our grandmothers and great-grandmothers had both seven and eight children. Let us preserve and revive these traditions,” said Putin.

“Having many children, [and] a large family, should become a norm, a way of life for all the people of Russia. A family is not just the foundation for the state and society. It is a spiritual phenomenon, the source of morality.”

Putin’s comments followed the Russian population dropping by 550,000 during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war. According to the Daily Express, “some have blamed Russia’s population woes on the war in Ukraine, leaving [some] reluctant to start families.”

Russian parents produce an average of just 1.42 children between them, prompting Putin to encourage the country’s women to have more. He backs up his words with action; while the Russian leader reportedly has six children with three partners, only two daughters are acknowledged publicly.

“Russia’s stagnating birth rates have been a factor since before the collapse of the USSR in the early 1990s,” the Express noted. “Life expectancy in the country has barely climbed since 1991, reaching just 71.34 years in 2020.

While Putin encourages Russian women to have kids, Ukrainian women work

According to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP), “some of the objective reasons for Russia’s demographic problems reflect historical dynamics. The number of women of childbearing age is falling, and the average age at which women are having children is rising steadily in modernized, urban [and] well-educated populations.”

The Washington, D.C.-based CEIP also noted that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has become a potential factor deterring Russians from having children. It added: “This has predictably changed family planning. Some people are deciding not to have children or to postpone starting a family or having another child until more psychologically and financially stable times.”

Moreover, the think tank pointed out that “the militarization of life in Russia” serves as an impediment to those wanting to start a family. This would only be favorable for “those who consider it their duty to supply the motherland with cannon fodder for future wars,” it added.

Putin’s call for Russians to replenish the population contrasts with that of Ukraine. Because of the martial law order announced by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the majority of Ukrainian men were drafted and sent to the meat grinder. This left Ukrainian women no choice but to work.

“With male workers drafted and sent to the front lines, hundreds of women have been put to work in Ukrainian coal mines,” Russia Today reported, citing a piece from Reuters. According to the original article, 3,000 of the roughly 20,000 male mine workers employed by Ukrainian energy company DTEK were drafted. To make up for the shortfall, it hired around 400 women.

“Our boys were taken to the front, and now we need to support them,” said a 22-year-old female miner. “There is no one else to work in the mine now.” (Related: Reuters: Ukrainian women now work in mines because so many men were sent to the battlefront.)

The country had legislation from the Soviet era prohibiting women from dangerous jobs like mining. However, Zelensky repealed this law shortly after the Russia-Ukraine war began in February 2022.

Head over to RussiaReport.news for more stories about Russia.

Watch this video about Russian forces discovering Ukrainian women among military casualties.

This video is from The Prisoner channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

DEMOGRAPHIC CRISIS: Declining population due to low birth rates is the biggest threat to Europe, warns Hungarian president.

Taiwan witnesses catastrophic 23% drop in birth rate in May of 2022, as global depopulation schemes take effect.

Ukrainian blogger calls for GENOCIDE of Russians: Wipe them off the face of the Earth.

Sources include:

Express.co.uk

RT.com

Brighteon.com

The Antisemitism Hoax Has Officially Collapsed. Jews Don’t Know It Yet, But It’s Over.

BY ANDREW ANGLIN,

The transformation has happened so fast that I don’t think people have yet grasped it:

  • The official definition of “antisemitism” before October 7, 2023 was “hating Jews for no reason.”
  • The post-7/10 definition of “antisemitism” is “saying Jews should stop killing babies.”

It’s a really massive transformation.

I know that most non-Jews don’t understand it, but what is even crazier is that most Jews don’t appear to understand it.

Jews have a psychosis where they view any criticism of their behavior as “hate.” I am supposed to be the world’s top anti-Semite, but all I ever did was criticize their behavior. However, Jews had some degree of plausible deniability with regards to their agenda to push homosexuality on children, or their agenda to flood white countries with poor, illiterate nonwhite immigrants. They could also claim that these things were good.

Now, they’re taking the same tack (“if you criticize our behavior, it means you hate us, and therefore you are evil”), but they are taking this position in the context of “we slaughter children.”

Basically, they’ve destroyed the entire anti-Semitism racket, permanently.

It’s really irresponsible of them. This gave them so, so much power, and they’ve just pissed it away.

“People hate us for no reason because we murder children” is simply not a viable PR strategy.

New York Post:

Jewish students have filed a federal civil rights lawsuit accusing the University of California of allowing the “longstanding, unchecked spread of antisemitism” at its Berkeley campus.

The lawsuit claims Jew-hatred has “boiled over” following the terror group Hamas’ sneak attack against Israel on Oct. 7 — even citing statements in the complaint from Cal-Berkeley’s own law school dean, Erwin Chemerinsky.

In the suit filed Tuesday in Northern California District Court in San Francisco, the plaintiffs representing Jewish students — the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law and Jewish Americans for Fairness in Education — noted that some two dozen student groups ban Zionist speakers.

The ban is blatant discrimination since nearly all Jews identify as Zionists or believers in the Jewish state of Israel, the complaint said.

Yeah, that’s… it’s very confusing. Belief in Zionism is not an intrinsic trait, such as having black skin. It’s a choice, and support for Zionism is a behavior. Therefore, if being against Zionism is “antisemitism,” then by definition, “antisemitism” does not mean “hating Jews for no reason.”

They were able to get away with this stuff when they could hide behind the Holocaust. It didn’t have to make sense, because they could just show a picture of a guy with a tattoo and say “my uncle was turned into a lampshade.” They were able to use emotional exploitation to bully people into silence.

The whole thing is now coming unraveled.

Since Oct. 7, antisemitism has run rampant at the school, the complaint said, citing numerous incidents of intimidation, harassment and physical violence against Jewish students.

For example, during one of the numerous rallies held at UC Berkeley celebrating Hamas, a Jewish undergraduate draped in an Israeli flag was set upon by two protesters who struck him in the head with a metal water bottle.

But he was attacked because he was draped in an Israeli flag, a flag which is now equated to the mass murder of children. He wasn’t attacked because “people hate him for no reason.”

Jewish students and professors are also receiving hate mail calling for their gassing and murder. Many Jewish students report feeling afraid to go to class, the suit said.

Pro-Palestinian protesters — who frequently chant “Intifada, Intifada” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” — disrupted a prayer gathering by Jewish students, according to the suit.

Yes.

People think the Jews should give back the stolen land. That’s a political position. It has nothing to do with “hate.”

The term “antisemitism” never had any meaning. It was always just a way to protect Jews from criticism by saying that anyone who criticized the Jews hated them for no reason.

Again, I have been labeled by the ADL as “the most prominent American anti-Semite.” I have not hated the Jews for no reason. I would actually take issue with the word “hate,” as I hope that the Jews find Jesus and repent of this evil they do. I earned this “anti-Semite” label because I criticized the Jews.

Here are a few examples of Jewish behavior I took issue with:

  • Working to undermine and destroy the Christian religion
  • Controlling the news media and using it to undermine the United States
  • Controlling the entertainment media and using it to undermine family values and basic morals
  • Infiltrating the US government and using our foreign policy to push the agenda of the Jews, including sending Americans to many wars in the Middle East
  • Producing and distributing pornography
  • Pushing feminism as a way to undermine the family
  • Promoting and normalizing homosexuality
  • Pushing the tranny and child tranny agenda
  • Using the “civil rights movement” to promote racial strife
  • Pushing mass immigration with the explicit goal of making whites minorities in their own countries
  • Pushing mass censorship, not just of criticism of the Jews directly, but of all Jewish agendas
  • Pushing abortion
  • Pushing for gun control
  • Creating communism
  • Engaging in usury-oriented financial swindles through the Federal Reserve system and Wall Street
  • Engaging in widespread political corruption, including through AIPAC, which bribes politicians who pledge allegiance to Israel and destroys politicians who don’t

The list obviously goes on.

And of course, we could talk about these issues. I am open to talking to the Jews about these issues, and hearing their explanations as to why they are engaged in these behaviors.

However, the Jews have no interest in talking about any of these issues. Instead, they simply want to silence anyone who asks why they are engaged in these behaviors, so they label them “antisemite.” This works because they evoke the Holocaust, and claim that anyone who disagrees with their behavior is planning to exterminate them. After all, Hitler disagreed with their behavior.

I mean, just look at what that nasty old Hitler did to that poor old Magnus Hirschfeld, a gay Jew who was pioneering genital mutilation surgeries!

That mean old nasty Hitler hated Hirschfeld for no reason because he was promoting pederasty and genital mutilation.

Everyone Sees the Antisemitism Hoax Now

I have been saying for over a decade that “antisemitism” is a hoax. People criticize Jews for their behavior, and Jews then claim that all criticism is “hate” and exists for no reason.

This thing that the Jews are doing in Gaza, however, is too extreme. It is the most extreme thing anyone has ever done. Maybe this kind of mass child slaughter happened in history (though I seriously doubt it), but it certainly never happened on TV like this.

If Jews were not completely unhinged, they would be trying to mitigate this. Every American Jew would be out in the public space saying “American Jews do not stand with Israel and their barbaric slaughter.” Even if they do agree with it, they should be saying they don’t.

Instead, Jews are circling the wagons and vowing to destroy anyone who questions the Jewish right to slaughter children. They are saying anyone who supports Palestinian kids is evil.

The problem here is: Jews can’t go to war with the whole world. There are not enough of them.

The only non-Jews who support the Jews are baby boomers, and they are quickly dying out.

The polls say that over 40% of Americans still support the Jews. But among young people, that number is less than 20%.

The thing is: with more than half not supporting the Jews, we are now in a situation where we can talk about the Jews. We can criticize them without being totally shut down. The Jew supporters are “conservative” retards who think these Jews have something to do with Christianity (beyond murdering Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ). Now that we can talk about the Jews, these “Zionist Christians” are going to be forced to confront the fact that Jews are behind child trannies, mass immigration, gay rights, BLM, and every other thing I listed above.

A good portion of Zionist Christians are simply satanic, and actually revel in slaughtering innocent people. But another portion of them are legitimately confused, because they are stupid, and when they find out what these Jews have been up to, they are going to be less than happy about it.

Then, of course, you have the rest of the world, where this whole “Zionist Christian” thing does not exist.

The Jews have really dug their own grave.

Clarifications for Assemblies

 By Anna Von Reitz

We have released the AFD and everything will become clear over the next few days, so everyone just keep calm and be joyous.  We are putting pieces in place.  Step 1, Step 2, Step 3…..
The Coordinator Introductory Training will begin on December 7thThursday, beginning at 8 pm Eastern Standard Time.  Out of consideration for our EST listeners, we are going to keep these training sessions short.  The WebEx link will be posted as soon as California has its set up complete. 
Contrary to rumors, these meetings are open to all current Coordinators, both State and County, including those temporarily suspended, and open to anyone who is genuinely interested in perhaps becoming a Coordinator. 
Also contrary to rumor, the participants do not have to be “escorted” by a Marshal-at-Arms or Continental Marshal. 
This is a public government and these are functions of our public government being discussed, so there are no security issues implied.  
Even though the Counties and the States occupy different jurisdictions and hold different powers, the job of the Coordinators, both State and County Coordinators, are very similar, so it is appropriate for them to train together.  We will comment whenever there is a significant difference, but most of the time, the work is the same.  
Recent concerns have been raised because County Coordinators have been attending State Coordinator calls.  They have been attending because they don’t yet have a separate County Coordinator call of their own.  For the reasons stated above, this is okay.  
County Coordinators need to be aware that they are Guests at the State Coordinator Calls and refrain from commenting and asking questions at these meetings so that the State Coordinators can get their business done. If they have questions that are unanswered, they can always jot them down and send me, Teri, or their State Coordinator an email after the meeting.
There will eventually be more than 3,000 County Coordinators and somewhere around 300 State Coordinators, so it would be easy even in these early stages for County Coordinators to overwhelm  the State Coordinator Meetings otherwise. Plans are on the drawing board for a separate County Coordinator Meeting.
Vetting is needed as part of due diligence when reviewing candidates for offices. This is a review of criminal records and conflicts of interest. This process is conducted by the Assembly Vetting Committee with help as needed from the Continental Marshals. 
This applies only to elections and should not be confused with the informal “getting to know you” questions that come with becoming an Assembly Member. 
As recently explained, we have both “Restorers” and “Reformers” coming into our Assemblies and these two groups are not compatible, because they have different aims.  
Reformers are focused on making changes to what presently exists as government in this county, which is well and good; Restorers, however, are focused on restoring the American Government to its full functionality, with checks and balances and unambiguous authorities intact. 
It is necessary when working with new people especially to find out what they are interested in doing and point them in the right direction. 
American State Nationals have a choice. They can join their State Assembly and work to restore the American Government, or, they can adopt a Dual Political Status and join one of the District Assemblies and seek reform.  
It really comes down to what you feel called to do: work to reform what is, or work to restore what should be. 
Of course, in the end, restoring the American Government works to reform the existing corporate government entities, as they are then forced to obey their contractual obligations and get back in their box.  
So both pathways lead to reform of the existing government — one does it from inside the box, and the other from outside the box. 
Direct reform via the District Assemblies and such measures as people are already familiar with, petitions, political election campaigns and lobbying,  may be the fastest way to secure relief, but restoration of the American Government will be more lasting. 
We can’t make the choice for individual ASNs but we can open up the discussion of what the choices are and make it easier for Reformers to head on down the street to the appropriate District or Municipal District Assembly, instead of confusing issues and wasting our State Assembly time. 
Our Assemblies are restoring the American Government.  It’s a huge job.  
We don’t have time to waste memorizing Federal Code, getting embroiled in lawsuits, begging our employees to be nice, being concerned about their political elections, or all the multitude of things that can otherwise distract us from our goal. 
Getting the Reformers on track and in the right District Assembly is vital, as it saves the Restorers from being delayed and ham-strung by people trying to work on a completely different agenda. 
Realizing that these Reformers are not our enemies and are not “infiltrators” is the first step.  Talking to them about their choices as ASNs — making them aware of the different Assembles and different approaches to government reform is a second step.  Separating them out of the State Assembly using Time Outs is sometimes a necessary third step. 
Reformers who don’t get the message that— hey, this is not what we are doing here— should be treated politely and given progressive time outs when they try to commandeer attention away from the restoration effort that the State Assembly is centered on. 
We cannot allow Reformers to redirect our attention away from our real purpose as State Assemblies, or waste our time and effort on reforming the existing foreign government.   
Those corporations in the District of Columbia are not our government; they are foreign subcontractors of our government. 
We realize that we are not part of the district corporations, are not their employees, officials, dependents, or shareholders thereof, and so, we are rightly intent on restoring our American Government instead. 

Make no apology and keep the Assembly on track. 
—————————-

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.