TWISTED: Biden admin wants to BAN Christian families from adopting kids in foster care because they don’t support the GAY AGENDA –

TWISTED: Biden admin wants to BAN Christian families from adopting kids in foster care because they don’t support the GAY AGENDA

The Biden administration is proposing a rule that prohibits Christian families who don’t support the LGBT ideology from adopting children in the foster care system.

The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), a division within the Department of Health and Human Services, was behind the proposal. It reportedly altered a requirement that federally funded foster care agencies must provide “safe and proper care” for children. Under this revised rule, adoptive families should meet three specific criteria to ensure that LGBT-identifying children are in a “safe and nurturing” home.

Before agencies place a child with a foster parent or “provider,” they must establish an environment free of hostility, mistreatment or abuse based on the child’s LGBT status; receive training to be prepared with the appropriate knowledge and skills to provide for the needs of the child related to the child’s self-identified sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression; and must be able to facilitate the child’s access to age-appropriate resources, services and activities that support their health and well-being.

Jonathan Scruggs, vice president of litigation strategy at the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), pointed out that discrimination against Christians is already prevalent. He added that ADF attorneys also submitted a formal comment to the ACF, recommending it withdraw the proposed rule.

“[The new rule] will deter families from fostering children and will make it harder to place children with capable, loving parents,” said Scruggs, who is also the vice president of ADF’s Center for Conscience Initiatives.

“Vulnerable children in America’s foster care system are urgently in need of loving families to care for them. Yet the Biden administration is threatening to put politics over parents, and gender ideology above children’s best interests.”

19 AGs blast the new rule for foster parents

This “twisted” and “insane” proposal did not sit well with 19 Republican attorneys general (AGs). Alabama AG Steve Marshall and 18 of his GOP colleagues wrote to HHS, alerting the department that the aforementioned rule violates the Constitution and discriminates against people who practice the Christian faith. They also argued that the said rule would harm children by limiting the number of available foster homes, harm families by risking kinship placements, and harm states by increasing costs and decreasing care options.

“These injuries will be suffered while HHS fails to solve a problem that the proposed rule does not even prove exists in foster care,” they wrote. The rule seeks to accomplish indirectly what the Supreme Court found unconstitutional two years ago: Remove faith-based providers from the foster care system if they will not conform their religious beliefs on sexual orientation and gender identity, the letter also included. (Related: Oregon orders Christian parents to allow their adopted underage children to be trans-mutilated on demand.)

Meanwhile, Tennessee AG Jonathan Skrmetti threatened to sue the Biden administration if it pushes through with the rule. “We are not shy about suing to stop federal overreach,” he remarked.

Skrmetti flagged some problems with the rule. First, any failure to affirm gender identity will be treated with the same alacrity as allegations of physical abuse.

“The natural outcome of that is you are diverting resources and the state’s not going to be in a position to provide as much of a response to actual physical abuse. It’s steering the state away from protecting kids,” he pointed out.

Second, the rule exceeds HHS’ legal authority as established by Congress by trampling on states’ broad authority in family law. He also insisted that the “arbitrary and capricious” rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act.

Third, the rule is riddled with various constitutional problems such as violating the First Amendment’s free speech and free exercise clauses.

“A lot of people who participate in foster care do so because it’s a way of living out their faith,” Skrmetti said. By asking people to “adopt the language and affirm the commitments of gender ideology, the federal government’s asking them to turn away from their religious beliefs.”

Read the latest news about America’s left-wing ideologies at

Watch this video that links transgenderism to depopulation.

This video is from the Schumann Thoughts channel on

More related stories:

Russian lawmakers propose bill banning adoption of Russian children to countries that allow transgenderism.

Evil in the medical system: Medically kidnapped children vulnerable to abuse in foster care.

Let’s Talk America with Dr. Alan Keyes: Dr. Rick Morton discusses abortion, adoption, Lifeline Children’s Services – Brighteon.TV.

Sources include:

Chinese spy balloon program linked to PLA’s hypersonic missiles –

A new report by Chinese defense researchers has linked the communist nation’s high-altitude balloon program to the hypersonic missile program of its armed forces.

This report was prepared by a group of researchers from the National University of Defense Technology, a Chinese university directly affiliated with the Central Military Commission, the highest Chinese government body that oversees the country’s armed forces, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

According to the report, the PLA is trying to set up a proper military command structure to control the deployment of high-altitude surveillance balloons known as “Near Space Operations Command.” Worse yet, this new command would also govern the use of hypersonic missiles.

Hypersonic missiles, as described by the report, are weapons systems that can strike targets anywhere in the world within minutes after launch and can maneuver to avoid anti-missile defenses. These missiles can be armed with conventional or nuclear warheads.

The PLA wants to combine the use of high-altitude spy balloons with hypersonic missiles so that when the spy balloons surveil high-value and heavily protected targets, they can direct hypersonic missiles toward them.

“Hypersonic weapons can attack rocket launch sites, [destroying] the enemy’s ability to fire anti-satellite missiles on our civilian satellite networks,” reads the report. “These attacks must be precise, overwhelming and merciless. This could change the pace of battles and bring a major impact to how a war would end.”

This report came out several months after the Air Force shot down a spy balloon from China off the coast of South Carolina after this balloon traversed the United States. (Related: Pentagon warns China now has over 500 operational nuclear warheads as it seeks nuclear parity with the U.S.)

The Chinese military has been using spy balloons for years for surveillance and gathering intelligence on targets far from the Chinese mainland. These spy balloons are currently governed by the Strategic Support Force, a separate branch of the PLA that is designated for espionage as well as cyber, electronic and psychological warfare. They operate at extremely high altitudes and low speeds. They can stay in the air for weeks or even months, providing real-time surveillance on enemy positions and serving as valuable long-distance communications relay points.

If these spy balloons are brought under the purview of the new Near Space Operations Command, China’s balloon fleet would be expanded to include other kinds of solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicles, like the one discovered and then shot down over the U.S., as well as other kinds of espionage vehicles.

China believes future conflicts will be decided in “near space”

The PLA’s desire to combine its spy balloon fleet with its hypersonic missiles comes out of a belief by Chinese military theorists that future conflicts will take place and be decided in “near space,” which is essentially sovereign airspace out of the legal reach of nations and international regulations.

“The understanding of near-space command needs to be deepened,” reads the report. “It is necessary to adjust the hierarchy of command and control powers, selection of command methods, implementation of executive orders and support for command communication.”

China is already a world leader in hypersonic missile technology. Its first fully operational hypersonic weapon is the DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle, designed to carry a DF-17 ballistic missile. It can travel at Mach 5 to 10, or five to 10 times the speed of sound.

Learn the latest information coming out of Beijing at

Watch this clip from “Redacted with Clayton Morris” as he and co-host Natali Morris discuss how Congress is excited by the prospect of war with China.

This video is from the News Clips channel on

More related stories:

Iran unveils new HYPERSONIC MISSILE in apparent warning to the U.S. and Israel.

U.S. to deploy previously banned missiles against China as a deterrent.

Bipartisan panel report indicates U.S. should get ready for simultaneous wars with both China and Russia.

China may have already deployed unstoppable hypersonic missiles capable of targeting American bases in the Pacific.

STRATCOM report reveals China has a larger nuclear ICBM arsenal than the U.S.

Sources include:

America’s public health agencies ‘evolved’ into a ‘giant engine of death’ for the genocidal US govt and now the eugenicists within the CDC, FDA and NIH are targeting our children –

America’s public health agencies ‘evolved’ into a ‘giant engine of death’ for the genocidal US govt and now the eugenicists within the CDC, FDA and NIH are targeting our children

“This is, in my opinion, the worst thing that’s ever happened to our country in my lifetime in the world, and the government’s role cannot be denied,” — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on C-19-Vaxx

(Article by James Howard Kunstler republished from

History is a trickster. It unfolds emergently with uncanny creativity, often blindsiding humanity with the unanticipated consequences and non-linear outcomes of previous ‘unfoldings.‘ So, here we are now in a Second Civil War. Really? “Between whom?” you might ask. Between truth and untruth. Between a sociopathic bureaucratic blob steeped in lies and a citizenry obliged to live and die by the blob’s lies. 

Case-in-point: the emergent evolution of US public health agencies, the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, the NIAID and their many fiefdoms, into a gigantic engine of death fueled by incessant and persistent lying. The people running these agencies lied to you about the creation and origin of the novel corona virus, SARS Covid-19. Then they lied about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines created as the sovereign remedy for Covid-19. They also lied about and suppressed actual effective treatments for the disease they invented and loosed on the world and then coerced the whole medical establishment into breaking its Hippocratic oath (first do no harm) to administer vaccines that killed. They lied about these things knowingly. And through the whole three-year episode, US public health has hidden the data about Covid and the vaccines while aggressively lying about it and punishing American citizens who found ways to expose the truth. 

The vaccines have killed an estimate 670,000 Americans and 17-million world-wide, consensus figures arrived at by citizens devoted to uncovering the truth. One of these is independent researcher Steve Kirsch, a Silicon Valley billionaire who invented the optical mouse. In 2021, after noticing a strange pattern of early deaths and injuries in his own circle of acquaintances, Mr. Kirsch devoted himself and his fortune to uncovering the truth about the Covid-19 vaccines. Mr. Kirsch describes himself as “a nerd,” by which he means that he is good at math and at assembling bodies of information using rigorous statistical analysis that present a coherent picture of reality, a.k.a. the truth.

Last night, Thursday, November 30, Mr. Kirsch gave a talk at his alma mater, MIT, in Cambridge, Massachusetts on what the best available statistics tell us about the Covid-19 vaccines (for instance, that so far they have killed more Americans than World War Two). The talk was live-streamed on the Rumble platform as seen in the 1st video at the bottom of this story. (Of course, YouTube scrubbed it). There is an interesting story behind Mr. Kirsch’s event. Years before the Covid-19 fiasco, Mr. Kirsch gave MIT $2.5 million to build a new lecture hall. Then, during Covid-19, Mr. Kirsch asked MIT to allow him to stage a lecture about his findings. The MIT administrators refused to let Mr. Kirsch speak in the lecture hall that he paid for. Mr. Kirsch went public with that, embarrassing the university, and under new MIT President Sally Kornbluth, the Institute relented.

Prior to the November 30 talk, Mr. Kirsch sought to share his data with eminent MIT professor Robert Langer, winner of countless awards for advances in the biotechnological sciences. Dr. Langer runs a research program that his MIT webpage describes as follows:

“The group’s work is at the interface of biotechnology and materials science. A major focus is the study and development of polymers to deliver drugs, particularly genetically engineered proteins, continuously at controlled rates and for prolonged periods of time.” 

Sounds like Dr. Langer would be intimately acquainted with the mechanisms of the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines, especially the development of lipid nanoparticles that facilitate the delivery of the mRNA message into their targeted cells. Dr. Langer declined to see the data or to meet with Mr. Kirsch. At the beginning of his talk, Mr. Kirsch offered some speculation as to why Dr. Langer might demur to see the data or meet with him.

Turns out it is because Dr. Langer sits on the Moderna board of directors. If Dr. Langer were exposed to “record level” data in a structured format that indicated the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine was killing a lot of people, Dr. Langer would be required legally to insist that the company take it off the market. Now you see how the venal mendacity of Big Pharma intersects with the perfidy of Academia, and at the highest levels. Dr. Langer has been called out, and publicly disgraced by Mr. Kirsch. Will Dr. Langer sue Mr. Kirsch for defamation? I doubt it. It is a fact that Dr. Langer is on the Moderna Board, and his obligations to the public are clear vis-à-vis Moderna’s flagship product. It will be interesting to see how MIT and Dr. Langer handle this quandary.

Read more at:

Rep. Issa: Big Tech still playing the CENSORSHIP game on social media –

Rep. Issa: Big Tech still playing the CENSORSHIP game on social media

Big Tech continues to play the censorship game on social media, according to Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

The congressman made this remark during a Nov. 30 appearance on “The Evening Edit” on Fox Business. “Social media, and for that matter Big Media, … is still playing the censorship game as we speak,” he told program host David Asman. Issa’s answer came as a response to the host’s question whether it is “wonderful” for the free market to come to rescue Americans from government censorship.

“Governments are getting involved even more so because beyond the censorship you are seeing, in some cases, [involve] people’s actual bank accounts being frozen up [based on] the type of business you do,” continued Issa, a senior member of the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government (House WFG Subcommittee).

“We have a lot of liberty problems we have to restore. That’s one of the things that Republicans are working on. And, in fact, thank goodness, we can tweet out what we believe with a high likelihood that an audience will be free to hear it.” (Related: Rep. Issa: Bipartisan effort needed to fight big tech censorship)

Meanwhile, Asman believes X platform owner Elon Musk does not care about censorship. However, advertisers are pulling out of X because of the smears from the nonprofit Media Matters. The Fox Business host cited The Walt Disney Company as one example of this, noting how its CEO Bob Iger has pulled advertising on X based on false premises.

Asman also touched on the second motion to impeach Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, asking his guest if he was going to vote for it. Issa responded that if this is the first step, he will participate in it.

But the California congressman expressed belief that his colleague, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), has pulled the measure. Despite this, he pointed out that the Republican-controlled House of Representatives must send a  message to President Joe Biden that his impeachment is coming.

House Judiciary Committee subpoenas two former White House officials

On the same day as Issa’s interview, the House Judiciary Committee (HJC) led by its chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) subpoenaed two former White House officials. The subpoenas went to former White House Senior Advisor for the COVID Response Team Andrew Slavitt and former White House Director of Digital Strategy Robert Flaherty. The HJC demanded that Slavitt and Flaherty disclose information on any role they played in censoring the American people’s opinions on social media.

“The [HJC] is conducting oversight of how and to what extent the Executive Branch has coerced and colluded with companies and other intermediaries to censor speech,” Jordan wrote to the two. “[We have] obtained documents that demonstrate the central role you played in communicating the Biden White House’s censorship efforts to social media companies, including the White House’s demands to censor true information, memes, satire and other constitutionally protected forms of expression.”

“To develop effective legislation, such as the possible enactment of new statutory limits on the executive branch’s ability to work with social media platforms and other companies to restrict the circulation of content and deplatform users, the [HJC] must first understand the nature of this collusion and coercion.”

The House WFG Subcommittee also continued its investigation on the federal government’s involvement in social media censorship on Nov. 30. Several witnesses testified during the hearing, including Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger – two of the journalists responsible for the release of the so-called “Twitter Files.”

Follow for more news about the federal government censoring Americans who don’t agree with it.

Watch Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) comment how Big Tech continues to play the censorship game on social media below.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on

More related stories:

Jim Jordan subpoenas CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, other top agencies for documents related to social media censorship.

HUGE: Biden officials ordered by federal judge to STOP contacting social media companies and demanding censorship of speech.

Lawfare with Tom Renz: Government, Stanford University colluded to CENSOR Americans and CONCEAL the truth – Brighteon.TV.

The “highest levels” of White House leadership pushed for social media censorship, lawsuit alleges.

Watch: New York Post editor details coordinated social media censorship of Biden family corruption.

Sources include:

The Great Oil Conspiracy: It has been known since the end of WWII that oil is not a fossil fuel; it is abiotic


There are two basic theories for the origin of crude oil: biotic and abiotic.

The origin of petroleum or natural gas may seem like a strange debate to have but determining whether this fuel is a fossil fuel or not is important.

If these fuels are truly fossil fuels, then they are limited in supply and alternative energy resources would need to be created at some point.

If they are not fossil fuels and are created through some form of abiogenesis – a natural process from non-living matter – then the need to develop alternative fuels is diminished.

The biotic theory is that oil and gas drilled out of the earth come from the remains of plants and animals trapped underground millions of years ago.  These “fossil fuels” took aeons to form and we are using them up far faster than they can be replenished.

This fossil fuel theory is, however, just that – a theory. There are many features of the fossil-origin theory which still apparently puzzle some scientists.  So, what if the whole theory is wrong?

The abiotic theory is an opposing view that has substantial evidence to back it up.  This theory goes back centuries and includes as its prominent champions Dimitri Mendeleev, best known for inventing the periodic table.

Abiotic Oil Theory

While the chemistry is quite complex, environmental chemist Tristan Coleman wrote, the principle behind the abiotic oil idea is actually quite simple.

Carbon present in the magma beneath the Earth’s crust reacts with hydrogen to form methane and other hydrocarbons, with many chemically complex intermediate stages. Certain mineral rocks such as granite and other silicon-based rocks act as non-depleting catalysts to speed up the process.

Experiments have shown that under extreme conditions of heat and pressure, it is possible to convert iron oxide, calcium carbonate and water into methane as well as hydrocarbons containing up to ten carbon atoms. Such experiments have been undertaken last century by Russian scientists as well as more recently in the US, and even more recently in Sweden.

The conditions in the Earth’s mantle would be sufficient for these small hydrocarbons to polymerise into the longer chain molecules found in crude oil, for example. Moreover, the limited oxygen present in the Earth’s magma prevents the hydrocarbons from burning up despite the intense heat and pressure.

The hydrocarbons of abiotic origin then migrate out of the mantle into the crust until they escape to the surface or are trapped by impermeable strata, forming petroleum reservoirs.

Sketch depicting the migration of abiotic oil upwards from the mantle into reservoirs contained by non-porous rock.
Source: The Atlas Report

Evidence Supporting Abiotic Theory

Some people have been deeply interested in oil and its origins but their advocacy of abiotic theory has many dismissing them as heretics, frauds or idealists. They hold that oil can be derived from hydrocarbons that existed aeons ago in massive pools deep within the earth’s core. That source of hydrocarbons seeps up through the earth’s layers and slowly replenishes oil sources. In other words, it turns the fossil fuel paradigm upside down.

Russian and Ukrainian Geologists

A 1996 paper by Dr. J. F. Kenney titled ‘Special Edition on The Future of Petroleum’ points out how predictions made that the human race was imminently going to run out of available petroleum “have depended fundamentally upon an archaic hypothesis from the 18th century that petroleum somehow (miraculously) evolved from biological detritus, and was accordingly limited in abundance.”

The hypothesis that petroleum originated from biological matter (fossils) “has been replaced during the past forty years by the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of abyssal, abiotic petroleum origins which has established that petroleum is a primordial material erupted from great depth,” Kenney wrote.

In his paper, Kennedy quoted Professor Vladilen A. Krayushkin, a strong proponent of abiotic theory and Chairman of the Department of Petroleum Exploration at the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, as saying:

The eleven major and one giant oil and gas fields here described have been discovered in a region which had, forty years ago, been condemned as possessing no potential for petroleum production. The exploration for these fields was conducted entirely according to the perspective of the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of abyssal, abiotic petroleum origins.

The drilling which resulted in these discoveries was extended purposely deep into the crystalline basement rock, and it is in that basement where the greatest part of the reserves exist. These reserves amount to at least 8,200 [million] metric tons of recoverable oil and 100 [billion] cubic meters of recoverable gas, and are thereby comparable to those of the North Slope of Alaska. It is conservatively estimated that, when developed, these fields will provide approximately thirty per cent of the energy needs of the industrial nation of Ukraine.

Professor Vladilen A. Krayushkin, Chairman of the Department of Petroleum Exploration, Institute of Geological Sciences, Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Kiev, and leader of the project for the exploration of the northern flank of the Dni eper-Donets Basin, at the VII-th International Symposium on the Observation of the Continental Crust Through Drilling, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1994.

Vladimir Kutcherov is a Swedish-based Russian geologist and a professor at the Division of Energy Technology at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm.  In 2009 he was a co-author of a paper published in the journal Nature Geosciences.

The idea that oil comes from fossils “is a myth … we need to change this myth,” Kutcherov said. “All kinds of rocks could have oil and gas deposits.”

Alexander Kitchka of the Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences estimated that 60% of the content of all oil is abiotic in origin. He said companies should drill deeper to find it.

Kitchka said oil may be found in all sorts of geological structures such as volcanic rock or deep-sea thermal vents where companies aren’t looking today.

Eugene Island

On Eugene Island, Louisiana, in 1995, it was reported that the oil fields were – perplexingly – refilling themselves after being depleted. The findings of Dr. Jean K. Whelan, part of a US Department of Energy exploration program, seem to support the abiotic theory to explain this. She found that the oil likely came from great depths, as abiotic proponents say.

In 1999, The Wall Street Journal reported:

Production at the oil field, deep in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, was supposed to have declined years ago. And for a while, it behaved like any normal field: Following its 1973 discovery, Eugene Island 330’s output peaked at about 15,000 barrels a day. By 1989, production had slowed to about 4,000 barrels a day.

Then suddenly – some say almost inexplicably – Eugene Island’s fortunes reversed. The field, operated by PennzEnergy Co., is now producing 13,000 barrels a day, and probable reserves have rocketed to more than 400 million barrels from 60 million. Stranger still, scientists studying the field say the crude coming out of the pipe is of a geological age quite different from the oil that gushed 10 years ago.

The Great Oil Conspiracy

The late Cornell University astronomer Thomas Gold championed the abiotic theory. He said that oil contains organic compounds not because it is derived from fossils but because giant colonies of deep-earth bacteria feed on deep hydrocarbon pools way down in the mantle.

He believed that the hydrocarbons we use come from chemical stocks that were incorporated into the Earth at its creation. Since the oil crisis of the 1970s, Gold said that the Earth is hugely well endowed with these hydrocarbons – hundreds of times more so than most geologists, oil companies or OPEC leaders believe. The general belief in scarcity that drives up gas prices and causes fears of inflation, Gold argued, is a mirage that has served vested interests among oil producers for decades.

Further reading:

In 2012, author and writer Jerome Corsi published a book titled ‘The Great Oil Conspiracy: How the U.S. Government Hid the Nazi Discovery of Abiotic Oil from the American’.

In the book, he explained that the Nazis knew that oil is abiotic and that they had been making synthetic oil out of coal. They developed what’s known as the Fischer-Tropsch Process, equations which explained that the earth makes oil under intense pressure and heat deep within the earth on an ongoing basis, even today.

In an interview with Crosstalk America shortly after the release of his book, Corsi said that the Fischer-Tropsch equations explained that the earth at deep levels forms oil naturally. “It’s nonsense to think that oil is fossil fuel,” he said.

Crosstalk America: The Great Oil Conspiracy (audio), 28 September 2012 (53 mins)

In the video above, Corsi explained that the biotic (fossil fuel) theory began by claiming that oil originated from dinosaur matter.  Then its advocates moved on to claim that oil came from matter from ancient forests. “Once that theory began to be abandoned, people said: ‘Oh, it’s plankton and other deeper biological material’ … this whole idea there’s kerogen, which is a pre-oil gummy-like substance that is in sedimentary rock that’s forming the oil, is nonsense.  It’s not the way chemistry works,” he said.

The Nazis realised that under intense pressure and heat, conditions which are in the mantle of the Earth, minerals that contain hydrogen and minerals that contain carbon in the presence of catalysts, such as iron oxide, will release hydrogen and carbon.  This will lead to the formation of hydrocarbon molecular chains that develop into the products we know as crude oil or natural gas.

“This is an ongoing process. It goes on all the time. It’s natural to the earth. And, in fact, our solar system abundantly produces various forms of hydrocarbons,” he said.

The “Peak Oil” theory is also nonsense, Corsi said. This theory started, Corsi said, when a Shell Oil chemist “took a napkin and drew a bell curve, a Hubbert’s curve, and said, basically, that we have a lot of oil, then we peak in the use of oil, then it runs out. But those predictions have never come true.”  Note that Corsi said this in 2012.  Also note that in 2020, AP News spuriously labelled him a “conspiracy theorist.”

Peak Oil, a hypothetical point when global oil production maximises and enters an irreversible decline, has been the holy grail of resource economics for decades.

According to Britannica, the first person to advance the Peak Oil theory publicly was Marion King Hubbert, an American geoscientist who worked as a researcher for the Shell Oil Company from 1943 to 1964 and taught geophysics at Stanford University and other institutions. In 1956, Hubbert presented a paper in which he depicted US petroleum production on a bell curve which predicted production peaking between 1965 and 1975 and then declining.

Forbes admitted in an article last year that there are hundreds of faulty predictions of Peak Oil. The fault in all these forecasts, Forbes noted, is a failure to recognise oil production as inherently political. Adding that “beliefs and faith in this prophecy drive policy much more than any detached analysis.”

It doesn’t sound too dissimilar to anthropogenic global warming which, using pseudoscience coupled with an ideology, has predicted “tipping points” for decades  In fact, Forbes linked Peak Oil directly to the much-touted “decarbonisation” agenda:

If Peak oil is already here, and we have yet not met our decarbonisation goals, then the implications for energy and the economy would be far-reaching.

If Peak oil is to arrive in the near future, then our current decarbonisation strategies, while not ideal, may be sufficient to reach the objectives of the Paris Agreement by 2050 with a temperature increase well below 2oC in comparison to pre-industrial levels.

If Peak Oil is far off, decarbonisation and environmental strategies face tremendous obstacles from the oil market and political pressure from the OPEC+ cartel. Recognition that oil is abundant changes the global oil market as well as the much-needed transition to clean energy.

Peak Oil: The Perennial Prophecy That Went Wrong, Forbes, 30 November 2022

Sources and further resources:

Is This Why Chase Debanked Dr. Mercola?

  • In mid-July 2023, Chase Bank closed my business accounts, along with the personal accounts of my CEO and CFO, and the accounts of their spouses and children

  • Chase Bank has close relationships with the technocratic control network that is trying to usher in a one world totalitarian government, and debanking is the weaponization of finance for the purpose of social control. By debanking us, Chase Bank has given people a foretaste of how central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and social credit scores will be used to control the masses

  • JP Morgan Chase chief information officer Lori Beer became a member of the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) newly launched Cybersecurity Advisory Committee in December 2021. So, JP Morgan Chase has been advising a federal agency, CISA, on how to most effectively censor and control Americans

  • Chase is also the only bank represented on CISA’s subcommittee on Protecting Critical Infrastructure from Misinformation and Disinformation. With everything we now know about CISA’s unconstitutional domestic censorship activities, it appears the weaponization of finance was part of the plan from the start, and Chase has now tested the strategy of “punishment by association”

  • Chase Bank also has intimate ties to Bill Gates and the notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. These connections link the bank not only to global child sex trafficking enterprises but also to Gates’ disastrous vaccine philanthrocapitalism, the hidden eugenics agenda, and the heart of the One World Government cabal, the World Health Organization

Visit Mercola Market


As previously reported, in mid-July 2023, Chase Bank closed my business accounts, along with the personal accounts of my CEO and CFO — both of whom have been with me for nearly 20 years — and the accounts of their spouses and children. This despite a new Florida law that specifically prohibits financial institutions from denying or canceling services based on political or religious beliefs.

At the time, the only reason given was that there was “unexpected activity” on an unspecified account. Later, a representative told reporters that account closures are typically only done for anti-money laundering purposes.1 2

However, no money laundering charges have ever been leveled against me, and in a real money laundering case, they seize your accounts outright. They don’t instruct you to take your business elsewhere.

Later, in response to an inquiry by Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, a Chase spokesman replied that the accounts were closed because my business had “been the subject of regulatory scrutiny by the Federal government … for engaging in illegal activity relating to the marketing and sale of consumer products.”3

The spokesman claimed the bank had a “legal obligation” to prevent funds from such activities from going through their bank. The problem with that “explanation” is that the last “federal scrutiny” of our business was when the Food and Drug Administration, in 2021, sent us a warning letter accusing us of selling vitamins C, D, and quercetin and pterostilbene advanced to “mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose or cure COVID-19” in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.4

However, a warning letter is not proof of illegal activity. It’s an accusation. We responded to the FDA’s letter and no further action was ever taken, because we had not, in fact, violated the law.

If Chase Bank insists it has a “legal obligation” to debank me, my employees and their families, over an old FDA warning letter, then they would also be legally obligated to debank Chase executives and employees who intentionally benefited from sex trafficking5 6 7 and defrauded investors with illegal investment schemes,8 which they have not done.

No, something else prompted Chase Bank to close our accounts, and the most likely reason appears to be the bank’s relationships to the technocratic control network that is trying to usher in a one world totalitarian government.

Since our debanking, we’ve discovered that Chase Bank has several connections to entities that are pushing the Orwellian dystopia that is The Great Reset, both domestically and internationally.

Importantly, JP Morgan Chase has been a long-time business partner of Bill Gates, setting up a vaccine “investment fund” together. So, Chase Bank is at the root of Gates’ vaccine profiteering, and has made untold sums from the vaccines Gates is involved with — including mRNA “vaccines.”

For starters, JP Morgan Chase chief information officer Lori Beer became a member of the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) newly launched Cybersecurity Advisory Committee in December 2021.9

According to a press release,10 this advisory committee is tasked with making recommendations to the CISA director on “policies, programs, planning and training to enhance the nation’s cyber defense.”

Two of the topics to be tackled by the subcommittee included “combating misinformation and disinformation impacting the security of critical infrastructure” and “transforming public-private partnership into true operational collaboration.”

So, what we have here is a bank, JP Morgan Chase, advising a federal agency, CISA, on how to censor Americans and figuring out how to leverage this public-private relationship to ensure the survival of an ever-more totalitarian and lawless government.

“By debanking me, my CEO, CFO, their spouses and children (actually barring them for life), Chase Bank has given people a foretaste of how central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and social credit scores will be used to control us.”

With that in mind, is it any wonder then that Chase was the first bank to “punish by association?” Make no mistake, debanking is the weaponization of finance for the purpose of social control.

By debanking me, my CEO, CFO, their spouses and children (actually barring them for life), Chase Bank has given people a foretaste of how central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and social credit scores will be used to control us.

If you’re found to be even loosely associated with a “dissenter,” the rug that is your financial life will be pulled from under your feet. The desired rest is for people to police each other and shun anyone who doesn’t go along with the official narrative.

Chase is also the only bank represented on CISA’s subcommittee on Protecting Critical Infrastructure from Misinformation and Disinformation.

Internal CISA documents obtained from an ongoing lawsuit against the U.S. government shows that a representative of Chase Bank, whose name was redacted, attended the Subcommittee’s March 1, 2022, meeting,11 12 at which the section chief for the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) warned that “subversive information” on social media could undermine public support for the U.S. government and that “media infrastructure” had to be held accountable.13

The committee members went on to discuss what the government’s strategic approach related to misinformation and disinformation ought to be, how best to organize information sharing between the public and private sector, and how to collaborate across channels.

We now know that a formalized process was implemented that allowed government officials to log into a special portal where they could flag social media content for removal.14

The committee also sought to identify entities that had “done appropriate social media monitoring for the government.” We now have proof that CISA partnered with a censorship consortium called the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), later rebranded as the Virality Project, to illegally censor Americans. I detailed this relationship in “How the Virality Project Threatens Our Freedom.”

Why was Chase Bank included in a meeting in which they were trying to tease out the best way for government to censor Americans? With everything we now know about CISA’s unconstitutional domestic censorship activities, the most likely answer is that the weaponization of finance was part of that plan, and a year and a half later, Chase tested this tactic on my employees and their families.

As mentioned at the beginning of this article, Chase Bank also has intimate ties to Bill Gates, as well as the notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. These connections link the bank not only to global child sex trafficking enterprises but also to Gates’ disastrous vaccine philanthrocapitalism, the hidden eugenics agenda, and the heart of the One World Government cabal, the World Health Organization, which receives most of its funding from the Gates Foundation.

As reported by Seamus Bruner,15 author of “Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life,” JP Morgan Chase has been one of Gates’ “most powerful business partners.”

In 2011, the bank formed an official partnership with Gates called the Global Health Investment Fund (GHIF),16 17 which “sought to profit from the development of vaccines and other health technologies.” Investors in GHIF included the Pfizer Foundation, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and entities funded by the governments of Sweden, Canada and Germany.

According to Bruner, the GHIF “backed mRNA technologies at least five years before the COVID-19 pandemic, and at least four of the companies that the GHIF invested in — Atomo Diagnostics, Access Bio, genedrive plc and Univercells — ‘actively worked to address the COVID-19 pandemic through efficient diagnostics that help identify and track cases and the application of innovative technologies for vaccine development and manufacturing.’”

In other words, JP Morgan Chase had a direct and financially motivated incentive to collaborate with CISA to censor COVID narrative destroyers like me, and to punish me and my employees for continuing to speak against the narrative even after we’d been successfully buried by Google, deplatformed by every social media out there, and having had our website taken down by hackers and our email servers permanently destroyed.

After all that, that’s when Chase Bank took action against us, and after learning the bank has been backing mRNA developers for nearly a decade, its actions now make more sense than ever. To them, shutting me up and closing me down was what you would call “personal,” because my viewpoints pose a clear threat to their investments.

Epstein was brought into the partnership by James Staley, a senior Chase Bank executive who managed Epstein’s relationship with the bank. Mind you, in 2008, Epstein, facing federal sex crime charges, pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of soliciting prostitution from someone under the age of 18 and served an 18-month sentence in a work-release program.18

Many knew it was a sweetheart deal that hid a far more sordid reality, yet Chase Bank had no qualms about keeping Epstein as a customer. They also maintained accounts for Epstein’s victims and “managed the flow of money between them,” according to The Washington Post.19

Chase Bank didn’t close Epstein’s accounts until 2013,20 and even then, the bank still retained an off-the-books business relationship with him that lasted all the way up to his arrest for sex trafficking in 2019.

As explained by finance expert Catherine Austin Fitts, founder of the Solari Report, the central bankers, most of whom are technocrats, have created a parallel society in which they are above all law and control just about everything — including fiscal policy.

Their plan, which is part and parcel of The Great Reset, is to implement a new financial system that will permanently lock their ill-gotten power into place. In short, the technocratic control system and the financial transaction system are one and the same.

This new transaction system is the end of currencies, because in this system, you can never take the currency out of the bank and put it in your pocket. You can only conduct transactions digitally, and all transactions must be validated and approved through and by the central bank.

Using my personal debanking experience as the example, it should be easy to see how this kind of transaction system can be used as a central control mechanism.

When someone steps out of line, their ability to make financial transactions is simply cut off, and there won’t even be a human making this decision. Financial punishment for wrongthink and associations with undesirables will be meted out by the artificial intelligence running the social credit system.

Knowing this, the options become rather simple. We can have a human civilization, or we can have an inhuman civilization. We can have a financial system where private monopoly controls the printing of money, or we can have a decentralized system founded in sound money.

I agree with Fitts, who says she wants to live in a world where the financial printing press has been decentralized, and where we are committed to human civilization — not a transhumanist dystopia run by technocrats steeped in the ideology of eugenics.

To make our vision reality, we must push just as hard for decentralization and freedom as the globalists are pushing their Great Reset. That means rejecting all of their convenience offerings, especially as it pertains to banking and surveillance.

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}” data-component-name=”ButtonCreateButton”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.