IDF Bloodied in Ambush at Khan Younis

February 12, 2024 Winter Watch Around the Web 0

As covered in our post yesterday, Khan Younis is still unsecured and a battle zone. Israeli media reporting more than 20 KIA and many wounded.

BREAKING:

⚡ 🇮🇱 Big Ambush in Khan Yunis, Gaza for the Israeli army, Many Dead and Injured

“The dangerous security event was an ambush on the Israeli army south of Khan Yunis and it took hours to transport the dead and wounded.” — The Israeli Broadcasting Authority.

Also,… pic.twitter.com/MgD41ImJKd

— Megatron (@Megatron_ron) February 11, 2024

Image

Be the first to comment

Post a Comment

In A First, Moody’s Downgrades Israel Credit Rating As War Takes Toll

Zero Hedge | Feb. 10, 2024

For the first time in its history, the State of Israel has seen its credit rating downgraded, as Moody’s on Friday took the country’s rating down one notch to A2, and said the rating outlook going forward is negative.

The country’s ongoing war with Hamas and occupation of Gaza will “materially raise political risk for Israel as well as weaken its executive and legislative institutions and its fiscal strength, for the foreseeable future,” said Moody’s, which added that the conflict will create deficits over upcoming years that “will be significantly larger than expected before the conflict.”

The war, now in its fifth month, began on Oct. 7, when Hamas militants shocked Israel with an invasion from Gaza in which military raids and terrorist acts took the lives of 1,139 people, including 695 civilians. The death toll from the Israel Defense Force’s retaliation is now reportedly approaching 28,000.

(***)

Moderna launches trials for new mRNA cancer injections – NaturalNews.com

Drug giant Moderna has launched a new clinical trial for an experimental mRNA (modRNA) “vaccine” for cancer.

The trial, which is taking place in the United Kingdom, will involve injecting participants from vials containing the same mRNA technology that Moderna used in its infamous Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine.”

Patients at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust will be the first, we are told, to take Moderna’s new mRNA cancer injections, which is described as “a new therapeutic to help their bodies recognize and fight cancer cells as part of a global trial.”

Known as mRNA-4359, the shots will be administered to patients at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust as part of a 1/2 clinical trial. The goal of the trial is to see if the new mRNA shot is safe and effective at treating melanoma, lung cancer and various other “solid tumor” cancers.

Reports state that the mRNA technology in the vials will present common markers of cancer tumors to patients’ immune systems. This, Moderna claims, will help to “train” patients’ immune systems to recognize and fight cancer cells while also potentially eliminating cells that suppress immunity.

“Whereas the COVID-19 vaccines trained immune cells using mRNA of a protein on the outside of the virus, these experimental mRNA cancer immunotherapies incorporate mRNA of common marker proteins found in tumors,” wrote Imperial College London in an announcement about the trial.

(Related: You know who else is pushing new vaccines? Billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates.)

Dozens new mRNA shots in Moderna pipeline

An 81-year-old man who is taking part in the trial was reportedly the first person ever to receive the new injection, which was administered to him at Hammersmith Hospital back in October.

The unnamed man, who chose to remain anonymous, lives in Surrey and suffers from a malignant melanoma skin cancer that is not responding to conventional treatments.

“I had a different immunotherapy, I had radiotherapy – the only thing I didn’t have was chemotherapy,” the man said. “So, the options were either do nothing and wait, or get involved and do something.”

For trial purposes, Moderna’s mRNA-4359 injections will be administered by themselves, as well as in combination with an existing cancer drug called pembrolizumab (Keytruda) that is an approved immunotherapy treatment.

The new mRNA cancer shot is just one of dozens new mRNA products that Moderna is currently pumping through its drug pipeline. These other mRNA products include shots for influenza (flu), RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), HIV, Lyme disease, Zika virus and more.

It is noteworthy that prior to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), Moderna had never before produced any kind of drug that worked for anything legitimate. The company’s mRNA COVID injection was likewise a failure in terms of actually helping people rather than killing them with poison.

“Moderna’s ‘safe and effective’ COVID vaccine did not prevent a person from being infected by the COVID virus, nor did it prevent the transmission of the virus COVID to others,” wrote a commenter.

“Some of the side effects were turbo cancers, spontaneous abortions and still births, various cardiac problems, blood clots, etc. Just think of all the new problems their new mRNA cancer vaccine will cause.”

“Moderna was a failing cancer-curing company prior to the con,” responded another about how Moderna was a sham operation from the very beginning. “They never cured a single patient in 10 years.”

Another suggested that cancer patients will likely live a whole lot longer if they avoid taking anything from Moderna.

“And don’t take any injection of any kind,” another added to the conversation. “Even anesthetic could have mRNA included with it, or some other toxic substance. The cabal are attempting all sorts of devious methods with which to kill us.”

The latest news about Big Pharma’s mRNA agenda can be found at Depopulation.news.

Sources for this article include:

100PercentFedUp.com

NaturalNews.com

Employers that mandated COVID-19 injections for workers can be held LIABLE for vaccine injuries, Australian court rules – NaturalNews.com

Employers that mandated COVID-19 injections for workers can be held LIABLE for vaccine injuries, Australian court rules

It is no longer legally viable for employers in Australia that mandated Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccination” on their employees to claim immunity from liability based on the argument that they simply followed lawful government directives.

The issue came to a head after the state of South Australia rejected a youth support worker by the name of Daniel Shepherd’s claim requesting compensation for a diagnosis of vaccine-induced pericarditis following forced vaccination by his employer. Shepherd appealed the ruling, ultimately prompting the South Australian Employment Tribunal to overrule the previous decision.

The South Australian Department of Child Protection (DCP) forced Shepherd to take the injection, which resulted in serious heart damage. The DCP’s defense argument claims that while the injection did, in fact, cause Shepherd’s pericarditis, the forced needling did not “arise from employment but from a lawful State Government vaccination drive.” In other words, the Australian government is to blame.

The tribunal, however, disagreed. Refusing to let the Australian government be held exclusively liable for its own jab mandates, the tribunal decided that Shepherd’s injury came about “as a result of both [the government’s] vaccination mandate and the applicant’s employment.”

Employment, the tribunal continued in its overruling, does not have to be the “only or most significant cause” of an individual’s COVID jab injury or injuries. It only has to be a “significant contributing cause of a work injury,” the suggestion being that employers cannot simply shift all blame onto the government.

(Fact check: Most of Australia’s earliest “COVID-19 deaths” occurred in people who were “fully vaccinated” in accordance with the nation’s guidelines, state records show.)

Governments, employers both responsible for vaccine mandate injuries

Regardless of who is held responsible, Shepherd’s life is still ruined either way. He remains incapacitated and unable to perform normal daily duties, which is likewise the case for thousands of other Australian employees who were forced to choose between destroying their lives by taking the mandated jabs, or losing their jobs and livelihoods by refusing them.

Shepherd took two injections before experiencing adverse effects, prompting him to refuse any further “booster” doses. His supervisor, however, ordered Shepherd to take a third dose within four months of receiving his second injection, or else lose his job.

Shepherd reluctantly complied, only to experience severe chest pains within 24 hours of getting boosted. His pain worsened day by day over the course of several weeks until eventually he was no longer able to bear it, describing the sensation as though someone was constantly kneeling on his chest.

An ambulance ultimately had to transport Shepherd to the Ashford Hospital cardiac unit where cardiologists diagnosed him with pericarditis, likely caused by his having received a third COVID-19 jab.

To be fair, state governments did slough off enforcement of the mandates onto managers in workplaces, threatening them with harsh fines and other penalties if they refused. They could have just said no to forcing the drugs on their employees regardless, but many employers took the bait and complied. Now, both governments and employers are on the hook for injuries caused by COVID-19 jab mandates.

The tribunal’s ruling means that many more injured employees can go after their employers, including private businesses, for forcing them to take dangerous, experimental drugs as a condition of employment. There is very little chance, though, that employers will actually fess up to culpability in employee injuries.

“The DCP accepted that Shepherd had been injured by the vaccine,” writes David James for LifeSiteNews about the matter. “Businesses are unlikely to make similar admissions, given the potential sums involved.”

The COVID vaccine genocide will not go unpunished. Find out more about the latest developments on the legal front at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

LifeSiteNews.com

NaturalNews.com

DOJ special counsel report describes Biden as having “diminished faculties” and “faulty memory” – proving critics right that he is in a state of COGNITIVE DECLINE – NaturalNews.com

DOJ special counsel report describes Biden as having “diminished faculties” and “faulty memory” – proving critics right that he is in a state of COGNITIVE DECLINE

The Department of Justice‘s (DOJ) special counsel report regarding allegations that President Joe Biden mishandled classified documents has described him as having “diminished” mental faculties.

The investigation against Biden comes from allegations that he mishandled classified documents by knowingly keeping them after his term as vice president ended in 2017.

Following a 15-month investigation, Justice Department Special Counsel Robert Hur has decided against bringing criminal charges against the president, writing in his report that it would be difficult to convince jurors that Biden “willfully” kept classified documents. (Related: White House concerned about Biden’s DECLINING mental state and Kamala’s UNPOPULARITY.)

“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” wrote Hur in his assertion that jurors were unlikely to vote to convict the president.

This report should have been an unequivocal legal exoneration, and Democrats should have been able to use the report as a victory against critics claiming that Biden is in a state of cognitive decline.

Instead, as New York Times White House correspondent Michael D. Shear describes it, Hur’s report has been “a political disaster” for the president.

Hur’s 345-page report, which details his investigation that included interviews with Biden, claimed that Biden had “diminished faculties” and a “faulty memory” during five hours worth of interviews held over two days. He claimed that Biden had “significant limitations” in his ability to recall certain events.

Hur: Biden couldn’t remember what years he served as VP, when his son Beau died

Among Hur’s assertions, he claimed that Biden could not remember what years he served as vice president and, in one instance, “he did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died.”

Speaking to reporters from the White House’s Diplomatic Reception Room on Feb. 8 after the report’s release, Biden strongly criticized Hur and accused him and the report’s other authors of “extraneous commentary” regarding his age and mental capacity.

“They don’t know what they’re talking about,” said the president. He appeared to take special exception at Hur’s claim that he could not remember when Beau died.”

“How the hell dare he raise that,” said Biden. “Every Memorial Day, we hold a service remembering him attended by friends and family and the people who loved him. I don’t need anyone, I don’t need anyone to remind me when he passed away.”

Beau Biden, the president’s eldest child and a veteran of the Delaware Army National Guard – including serving for at least a year deployed in Iraq – died of an aggressive form of brain cancer in 2015, possibly caused by lengthy exposure to toxic chemicals during his deployment.

In a follow-up written statement, Biden claimed that he was distracted during the five hours of in-person interviews – held over two days on Oct. 8 and 9 – because Hamas had just attacked Israel on Oct. 7.

“I was in the middle of handling an international crisis,” the president wrote. “I just believed that’s what I owed the American people.”

Watch this clip of Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocey describing how it is now up to the White House to prove that Biden’s cognitive faculties are in order.

This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Ben Armstrong: White House’s admission that Biden has dementia makes him an “open national security risk.”

CLAIM: White House quietly pondering replacing Kamala Harris, fessing up about Joe Biden’s mental decline.

Rep. Ronny Jackson: Biden “can’t do the job” of U.S. president due to COGNITIVE DECLINE.

Biden insists he’s still capable of leading America, but his MIND and BODY are clearly not up to the task.

COVER-UP: White House chief doctor deems Biden fit to work, but omits cognitive test.

Sources include:

DailyMail.co.uk

Reuters.com

TheGuardian.com

NYTimes.com

Brighteon.com

Landmark fluoride trial CORRUPTED by judge: Scientists not allowed to reveal political influence in keeping public water supply laced with NEUROTOXINS – NaturalNews.com

Landmark fluoride trial CORRUPTED by judge: Scientists not allowed to reveal political influence in keeping public water supply laced with NEUROTOXINS

A landmark trial is taking place in which the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is suing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over its pro-fluoride policies requiring United States water supplies to artificially fluoridate public drinking and tap water with neurotoxic fluoride chemicals.

With all the breaking news about war in the Middle East, the 2024 presidential election and America’s southern border crisis, many are unaware that FAN, a longtime public advocacy group, has finally taken the EPA to court over the fluoride scandal.

Former National Toxicology Program (NTP) scientific director Brian Berridge, DVM, PhD, recently testified at the trial about an NTP draft report linking fluoridated water consumption to lower IQ in children. Said report was court-ordered to be released last March, and Berridge was there at the trial to speak about it.

Once in the courtroom, Berridge was muzzled by Judge Edward Chen and told he could only discuss the formal NTP report publication process. Berridge was restricted from expressing his own educated viewpoints about the political overreach that steers NTP reporting, including the NTP’s delay of releasing the findings.

Berridge later spoke with The Defender about his concerns with what transpired, stating that he is annoyed at how the NTP report publication process was delayed, which he says is due to public health agencies’ desire to protect the fluoridation process they already have in place.

“This lack of consideration for all the possible people who could be harmed by [water fluoridation] so that we don’t implicate something that we have intentionally done bothers me a lot,” Berridge expressed, further noting that because of the delay, many public health officials are ignoring the public’s growing concern about fluoride exposure.

(Related: A full decade ago, researchers at Harvard University recognized that drinking fluoridated water causes ADHD and mental disorders.)

Where’s the honest fluoride research?

The purpose of the NTP releasing such reports is supposed to be about informing public health agencies about the latest science so they can make any necessary adjustments to their processes. In this case, the NTP report’s findings that link fluoride exposure to low IQ in children was supposed to be released as soon as possible, but was delayed for political purposes.

In partnership with Moms Against Fluoridation, Food & Water Watch and other advocacy groups, FAN is taking the EPA to task in an attempt to stop artificial water fluoridation throughout the United States. Part of making that happen involves getting the NTP report into the hands of public health policymakers so they can institute real change.

When Berridge attempted to help the process along by offering his testimony on the matter, the EPA convinced Judge Chen back in December to bar him from giving it, arguing that he would expose the political influence behind the scenes that aims to stop the NTP report from ever being formally published.

“The NTP, a subagency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that produces scientific research meant to inform policymaking, concluded in the report that prenatal and childhood exposure to higher levels of fluoride is associated with decreased IQ in children,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD), which publishes The Defender.

Transgender HHS Assistant Secretary for Health “Rachel” Levine also played a role in stopping the NTP from publishing its fluoride report back in May 2022, having ordered the NTP not to publish the report and rather put it on hold indefinitely.

“You would be hard-pressed to find an analysis that has the level of rigor and review that this particular analysis does,” Berridge said about the report.

The latest news about the fight against fluoridated water can be found at Fluoride.news.

Sources for this article include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

NaturalNews.com