Exclusive: Medical examiners were told to lie on death certificates

In Massachusetts, the state Department of Public Health told medical examiners that if the person died with COVID, to list COVID as a cause of death, even if COVID had nothing to do with the reason the person died.

I know this because one of my state medical examiner friends in Massachusetts was told to do this. My friend won’t speak out about this publicly because he (or she) needs his (or her) job.

This is a violation of federal law.

This could be happening in other states as well. I would not be surprised.

Why would a state department of public health instruct medical examiners to lie? Two reasons:

  1. To get federal funds for the state

  2. To encourage people to get the shots

If you are a “fact checker” or a member of the mainstream media and want to verify this is true, use the contact me link.

The reason no fact checkers will contact me is that the death records are the ultimate proof this is happening. The listed causes of death don’t match the real cause of death. It’s objective evidence.

In other news, this Epoch Times story just came out as well, “EXCLUSIVE: FDA Withholding Autopsy Results on People Who Died After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines.”

Where it rains, it pours.

The article noted:

The FDA declined to release any reports, even redacted copies.

Hmmmm… now why would the FDA withhold from the public proof that the vaccines are safe and effective?

But there is nothing to worry about. After all, if you can’t trust the FDA, who can you trust?

Someone should go to jail for this, but I think it is unlikely that the state Attorney General and the DOJ will press any charges.

So everyone is safe from prosecution.

That doesn’t make it right.

There are ways to ensure justice is served, even when the state AG and DOJ choose to ignore it. We are pursuing this.

I’ve reported this to the FBI so we’ll see whether the FBI is corrupt as well.

Please share this article.


My question to the The Times science reporter

Steve, my yahoo mail account wouldn’t let me open this post. So I decided to close out all windows and try again. Then it was no longer in my yahoo inbox. Wasn’t in trash or junk folder. I had to open an old post of yours to get to this one. Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this?

VSRF Update Thursday Night: New mRNA Harms for Fertility and Reproduction

VSRF Weekly Update

Thursday, September 29

7pm Eastern / 4pm Pacific

Register here to watch on Zoom


Live stream on Rumble

Watch the preview for this Thursday’s show with Dr. Naomi Wolf & Dr. James Thorp

Our friend Dr. Naomi Wolf returns to the show this week to update us on the work she and her DailyClout team have been doing investigating the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial data.  Naomi is joined by Dr. James Thorp, MD, – a Board-Certified Obstetrician Gynecologist and Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician with over 43 years of obstetrical experience.  We will focus on the new data being exposed about how mRNA harms fertility, reproductive, and fetal health.    

We had such a great show last week with Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, deep diving into the science, and I am happy we are doing so again this week.  I founded the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation to explore, support and promote the real, sometimes difficult, research into the COVID-19 vaccine program.  Through all our hard work in the teeth of unimaginable opposition, the medical-scientific “establishment” is finally coming closer to where we were over a year ago. We are winning.

This isn’t a game, so when I say or write “we are winning” what I mean is, people are waking up to the extraordinary dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines.  Just this week, JAMA released a study that it would not have been published a year ago. The article would have been banned from Twitter and its authors likely penalized.

What a difference a year makes.

Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

See you tomorrow at 4pm Pacific / 7pm Eastern. Bring a friend!

We also have new programming content to share!  Be sure to join us for our new show for college students on Friday. We are now in our fifth week

Takes place every Friday, Noon Eastern, 9am Pacific. 

For College Students and families.

Hosted by Ohio University Senior Tyce Patt.

Watch every Friday at Noon Eastern / 9am Pacific on our Rumble channel

Please “share” any of these links:

  1. VSRF Promo on Defeat The Mandates Twitter

  2. VSRF Promo on Gettr

  3. VSRF Promo on Gab

  4. VSRF Promo on Instagram

  5. VRSF Promo on TruthSocial

  6. VSRF Promo on Telegram

  7. Friends of VSRF on Facebook

Proof: AFP is a very unreliable “fact checker”

Yet another fact check with significant errors trying to discredit me. They never even called me for a comment. Shame on them.

Consider this “fact check” which mentions me:

It states:

The piece bases its claims on a document published online by Steve Kirsch, a US entrepreneur who has pushed unproven drugs to treat Covid-19. Kirsch claims the report was produced for a member of parliament — but he does not specify a party, as the Gateway Pundit does.

Wow. Consider the headline of my article that they perma-linked to prevent tampering:

See the headline? You don’t need to get beyond the first line of the headline!

You can’t make this stuff up. Talk about sloppy fact checking.

And the document itself says on page 3, who it was prepared for (again, from the perma-link in the fact check):

Finally, even if the Ontario data is different from other data, it does not invalidate the Ontario data.

A good fact checker would simply acknowledge the Ontario data differs from other data.

But to actually resolve the conflict and rule that the Ontario data must be wrong is well beyond the capabilities of the people employed by these so-called “fact checker” organizations.

I invite Marisha Goldhamer to a recorded zoom call where we can discuss how she knows that the Ontario data is untrustworthy. She can bring as many Canadian health authorities as she wants. She’ll need all the help she can get.

Marisha, you can accept using the Contact me link.

If you really want to stop misinformation, taking me down in a recorded zoom call would make a difference.

I don’t know why nobody in the press or mainstream medical community wants to do that. They don’t want to see the Israeli safety data either for some reason.


The data says you should never breastfeed your baby after you’ve been vaccinated

The data says not to breastfeed: it has killed or seriously injured infants.

But the CDC, without any study whatsoever on the all-cause risk-benefit, says it’s fine. They are irresponsible and wrong.

If you received the COVID vaccine and are breastfeeding your baby, you should stop breastfeeding immediately and read this story now:

This story appeared on September 20, 2022. It was ignored by all worldwide mainstream media. It only recently started getting attention because Dr. Naomi Wolf talked about it.

It is well established that the vaccines are unsafe for young adults, no matter how young. Now read this article about babies who have been vaccinated:

Here’s their recommendation. No all-cause risk-benefit study was ever done to justify their recommendation.

Byram Bridle comments about this and describes the mechanism: the vaccine is getting transferred to the infant via breast milk. This isn’t immunizing the child who has a very under-developed immune system. It is doing nothing but harm.

He writes:

At its core, this new peer-reviewed scientific publication provides clear proof-of-principle evidence that the mRNA from both Pfizer/BioNTech’s and Moderna’s COVID-19 inoculations gets into the breast milk of lactating mothers.

But there’s much more. It’s an excellent article and I highly recommend it.

See also:

This is the JAMA study: https://archive.ph/TBtt6

Because infants are smaller, they are most likely much more sensitive to these nanoparticles; that is what you find when other forms of infant deaths and vaccine injuries are studied–the premature/smallest infants have the highest rates of death (as do those who receive more vaccines at the same time).

The COVID vaccines are much more dangerous than other vaccines and even other vaccines are unsafe before and during pregnancy:

Dr. Naomi Wolf: mRNA Found In Breast milk Given to Children, Babies Experiencing Side Effects Sept 27, 2022

Naomi Wolf Discusses Attempt Of The Global Health Community To Cover Up Their COVID Misinformation Sept 28, 2022

Naomi Wolf Lays Out The Case For Banning Covid Vaccines For Pregnant Women Aug 30, 2022 (See also the transcript)


A mom in my mother’s group got vaxxed while nursing her 8 month old. Baby broke out in terrible hives and was taken to hospital. The child had been previously healthy. That was over a year ago. Sadly, the baby has spent over a year in and out of the hospital with serious health crises. Now the baby has been diagnosed with juvenile arthritis. Unbelievably, mom won’t see the connection between the jab and what has happened to her child.

Concerned in Midwest

Steve…I am hesitant to give too many details but I know of a toddler not quite two years old who died earlier this year suddenly from what has been found to be a very rare and aggressive type of lymphoblastic leukemia. From what I gather she may have still been breast-feeding and mom was a healthcare provider whom was required to take the shots… This was a horrific tragedy and of course there is no way to 100% connect the dots on this one but my gut tells me this was due to the breast milk and her reaction to it. How many people/kids need too die before they stop this diabolical experiment???

Josh Guetzkow

Those articles were published in Yaffa Shir-Raz’s Real Time Magazine. Yaffa is also the one who broke the story on the leaked video of the Israeli MOH meeting, also in Real Time Magazine.

A few years ago she also broke the story on the secret Sci-B-Vac experiment approved by the MOH to be conducted on day-old infants in Israel (you’re going to want to be sitting down for this one):

A Midwestern Doctor

There is one important thing to add in. Breast milk has lipid nanoparticles of microRNA that affects gene expression in infants and the mothers use that to help the babies adapt to the environment. This was a major reason why I felt the claim the mRNA lipid nanoparticles would be unable to affect human DNA (given what natural oral microRNA lipid nanoparticles could do) was not true and also why there would be issues with the vaccines affecting breast milk. Here is one example of an article on the topic: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01768-w

Breast milk is an amazing superfood for children, and a lot of vital components go into it that are almost never appreciated by the medical system (so the effects of something like mRNA lipid nanoparticles on it would never be considered). Within medicine, the main focus has always been to just get mothers to stop breastfeeding their babies so more formula can be sold to them, which is sad because so many problems arise from not breast feeding (including being more susceptible to childhood vaccine injuries). I tried to put an article together on all of this and the various scandals that have happened when the formula shortage happened (a lot of it is hard to believe) since I was amazed a lot of women thought their babies would starve if they could not buy breast formula (which is a testament to how much industry has brainwashed people into think infant formula is essential for life)

Nobody should be vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines,” especially kids and mothers who are breastfeeding.

The CDC needs to correct their advice ASAP, before more babies are killed.

But they won’t. They’ll try to discredit all of these reports. They clearly don’t need any scientific studies to back up their recommendations since there were none.

The good news is that as of Sept 23, Senator Ron Johnson is ahead in the polls and when the Republicans re-take control of the Senate, heads will roll.

Please share this article and help save a life.


Top doctor who once promoted COVID vaccines on TV, now says they should be halted

A highly respected cardiologist and expert in evidence-based medicine was prompted to take a critical look at the vaccine data after the unexpected death of his father 6 months after vaccination. He spent 6 months carefully studying the data and consulting with other top scientists. He’s now calling for a halt to the vaccines based on the data.

Check out this story in the Epoch Times about Dr. Aseem Malhotra and the 547 comments:

Here’s the short story:

  1. Dr. Aseem Malhotra is a well known, highly respected British cardiologist and evidence-based medicine expert. He promoted the COVID vaccines on British TV, even appearing on “Good Morning Britain” to advise Indian film director Gurinder Chadha to get the shot.

  2. He started doing research on the vaccine after the suspicious death of his father who died after getting the vaccine, and found the connection. Two of his father’s major arteries were severely blocked, even though Malhotra described his father as a fit person who did not have any significant heart problems.

  3. His father died 6 months after getting dose 2 of the Pfizer vaccine. This is totally consistent with the 5 month average delay time for massive clots appearing after getting the COVID vaccines. This is what the embalmers found as well: the large clots only started appearing in mid-2021.

  4. Aseem spent 6 months looking at data critically including talking with other top scientists. He “slowly and reluctantly” came to the conclusion he was wrong about the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines. His journey was documented in his first paper. He mentions he teaches evidence-based medicine and follows all the principles.

  5. In January, 2022, he started writing up what he found.

  6. On Sept 26, 2022 the two papers he wrote, calling for a halt to the COVID vaccines, were published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

  7. He told the Epoch Times, “There is more than enough evidence—I would say the evidence is overwhelming—to pause the rollout of the vaccine.” 

  8. Nobody has attacked any of the facts he used as a basis for the conclusion in his paper.

  9. He has no conflicts of interest that would cause him to “switch sides”

  10. They can’t attack him on his motivation or his facts. The paper was peer-reviewed for 3 months.

  11. At the press conference to announce his papers and change of heart, only GB News attended. This was the same news organization that was the only major news organization to cover the Israeli safety data coverup.

A doctor who promoted COVID-19 vaccines is now calling for health authorities around the world to pause administration of two of the most-widely utilized COVID-19 vaccines, asserting that the benefits from the vaccines may not outweigh the risks.

“There is more than enough evidence—I would say the evidence is overwhelming—to pause the rollout of the vaccine,” Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a British cardiologist and evidence-based medicine expert, told The Epoch Times.

A paper from Malhotra was published on Sept. 26 detailing the evidence.

Dr. Malhotra notified me of the press release and paper on Saturday, but I’ve been a bit backed up.

Here are links to the two papers he wrote that are now published in a peer-reviewed medical journal:

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine (Part 1 and Part 2).

These papers, both published on Sept 26, 2022, talk about how we got it wrong, why we got it wrong, and solutions.

The papers start by stating vaccines are safe (which I would disagree with) and that Dr. Malhotra was one of the first people to get vaccinated with Pfizer when the vaccines became available. He writes, “the main reason I took the jab was to prevent transmission of the virus to my vulnerable patients.”

So he was totally blue pilled when he got injected.

The papers conclude:

There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current COVID vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future the medical and public health professions must recognise these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical-industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions, but the health – of both humanity and the medical profession – depends on it.


It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.

Only GB News attended. It was ignored by all the world’s mainstream press. Read this excellent writeup by Dr. Tess Lawrie who was very disappointed that there was no coverage of this important paper by a former vaccine advocate:

Here are a few things you might find interesting:

  1. I asked how many journals refused to publish his papers. The surprising answer is zero. He simply submitted the papers to one of the very few medical journals with no ties to big pharma and no advertising and would take a paper of 10,000 words.

  2. It was split into two articles because the journal has a size limit for a single article.

  3. He started working on the paper 9 months ago.

  4. After a 3 month double blind peer-review, the papers were accepted.

  1. “Leading scientists say the new paper is important.” (from the Epoch Times article).

  2. His peers mostly reacted with support, some privately. He wrote to me, “No overt criticism.”

  3. After the new paper was published, critics noted that Malhotra is a board member of the Journal of Insulin Resistance. This makes sense. If you can’t argue the fact, attack the person. He is a member of the board, but there are strict rules about how such papers are handled by journals.

  4. Dr. Campbell Murdoch, who advises the Royal College of General Practitioners, said that the study “describes multiple systemic failures in the provision of safe and effective evidence-based medicine,” and that the situation has made it “impossible for patients and the public to make an informed choice about what is best for their health and life.”

  5. Some others criticized the paper, including Dr. Victoria Male, an immunologist at Imperial College London. Male wrote on Twitter that Table 2 in part 1 which outlines the number of people in each age group estimated to need a vaccination to prevent a COVID-19 death “is quite in favour of vaccination.” But the problem is that estimate is based on the UK government data which miscategorized deaths. The actual Pfizer Phase 3 trial, where the vaccine was a closer match to the variant circulating, was that the drug may have saved 1 life per 22,000 people vaccinated. And the paper itself warns that the estimates in Table 2 are likely to be inaccurate.

  6. The British Society of Immunology said in response to the paper: “The safety and effectiveness assessments of all medicines and vaccines should be based on robust analysis of the evidence. This is the gold standard of healthcare research and is the high-quality analysis the public deserves to allow them to make evidence-based decisions about their health. Unfortunately, this paper does not thoroughly analyse all the available evidence and contains many narrative reflections. While individual case studies can be emotive, to understand the full picture, we must undertake robust evaluation examining the response from large numbers of people to be accurately able to assess the benefits and risks of any medical intervention. The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been available for almost two years and many millions of doses have been given to people in the UK and around the world. Both in the initial clinical trials and throughout this rollout period, many researchers and health agencies have been carefully analysing the ongoing effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.” Oh really? Let’s take the Israeli government for example. They didn’t monitor for safety for a year and after they did, they hid the safety results. See the Israeli safety data coverup which the British Society of Immunology conveniently ignores despite calling for looking at all the available evidence. How do they explain those results? Or take our own CDC who can’t get their story straight as to whether they were analyzing the VAERS data or not. They’ve switched their stories so many times I can’t keep track of it. Pfizer’s own Phase 3 trial showed more people died in the vaccine group than the placebo group. Should we ignore that? Where are the post market studies comparing all-cause mortality and morbidity? Wayne Root did his own personal study of this since nobody else did and what he found was inexplicable if the vaccines are safe. Shouldn’t we include that anecdotal evidence? How can anyone explain that? I did my own with statistics from 600 people and they matched what Wayne found: the vaccines are unsafe. Or how about the polls I did? Or the huge diversity of evidence summarized in this article? Should we ignore all of that evidence which is all counter-narrative? Should we ignore the fact that nobody in the medical community was curious enough to want to see the Israeli safety data? Dr. Paul Offit didn’t want to see it. CDC outside committee chair Grace Lee didn’t want to see it. But Professor Martin Kulldorff wanted to see it and he’s not even on the CDC and FDA committees anymore. The British Society needs to explain why scientists do not want to see any data that goes against their belief system. Is that how science works nowadays? Are they proud of that?

Nobody else will cover this except GB News.

Mark Steyn interview (16 minutes; August 16, 2022). Aseem relates that the authorities were shocked to learn what he had found (which they should have known).

Dan Wootton interview (9 minutes; Sept 26, 2022). The best part was at the end where Pfizer refused to comment, and the MHRA said in response the narrative that “vaccines are the best way to protect people from COVID-19.” They refused to address anything in the papers.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra is a hero. When he learned he was wrong, he did the right thing: publicly admitted his mistake and called for the halt to the vaccines.

He was publicly advocating for the vaccines and he himself is double jabbed with the COVID vaccines. When a personal event made him question what he had been told, he spent 6 months looking at the data and publicly admitted he was wrong. He did this at considerable risk to his reputation.

He’s the type of doctor that the authorities and the medical community should be listening to. Instead they are trying to silence and discredit him and his work. They should be ashamed of their actions. History will not be kind to them.

The truth will eventually come out. Those who stonewall the inevitable will suffer the consequences.