A New Rooftop Wind Energy Invention Is 16X More Efficient Than Solar Panels

a-new-rooftop-wind-energy-invention-is-16x-more-efficient-than-solar-panels

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A new rooftop wind harvesting device is capable of generating 50 percent more electricity than solar panels for the same cost, according to its inventors, a Texas-based startup called Aeromine Technologies.

The new technology replaced the blades found in traditional wind turbines with an aerodynamic system that harvests energy from the airflow that’s created above a building, which makes it silent and safe for birds and other wildlife.

Love reading The Pulse? If you’re a regular reader of our work and love what we do, consider becoming a paid subscribing member and help us expand our work. You can support for as little as $5 a month and enjoy multiple member benefits. Click Here to Learn More.

According to Aeromine CEO David Asarnow, a veteran of the climate technology industry,

“This is a game-changer adding new value to the fast-growing rooftop power generation market, helping corporations meet their resilience and sustainability goals with an untapped distributed renewable energy source. Aeromine’s proprietary technology brings the performance of wind energy to the onsite generation market, mitigating legacy constraints posed by spinning wind turbines and less efficient solar panels.”

David Asarnow

The Aeromine system can utilize a small footprint on a building’s roof, leaving ample space for existing solar and utility infrastructure.  It provides commercial property owners, who are facing increased energy costs and rising demand for features such as electric vehicle charging stations, with an effective new tool in their drive toward energy independence.

Aeromine’s patented technology was validated through joint research with Sandia National Laboratories and Texas Tech University.

Everyday new clean and “green” technologies seem to emerge, and there’s no doubt that many of them will be implemented. Just last month we reported on an emerging technology that literally generates electricity out of thin air. These types of technologies tend to be better than wind or solar as they don’t rely on the elements.

One of the electrical engineers, Jun Yao, from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, stated that they are “literally making electricity out of thin air.”  They are calling it the “Air-gen” and it generates clean energy 24/7, thanks to the electrically conductive protein nanowires produced by Geobacter. You can read more about that here.

Our Favourite Examples

Some of our favorite technologies are ones that truly go beyond the limitations of more primitive technologies like wind and solar.

Sangulani (Maxwell) Chikumbutso, an inventor from Zimbabwe, invented an electric system that runs off a battery that charges itself with electromagnetic radiation that’s present naturally in the environment. It can run forever.

According to Maxwell’s claims, the energy to power the battery is taken from electromagnetic waves that exist all around us and are, again, naturally present in our environment. Multiple vehicles and power generators have been developed via his work.

When this story broke, a number of “fact-checkers” simply labelled it as false without any investigation or journalism being done on their part, but this doesn’t seem to be the case. You can read and learn more about his story and specific examples of technology he has developed, here.

Below is another one of our favourite examples that also includes a discussion around why truly exciting energy technologies rarely make it into mainstream conversation. We have the potential to go far beyond solar and wind power.

We explore the test results of an energy device that we have been tracking for almost a decade. Inventor Paramahamsa Tewari showing his over-unity results which are replicated by another team.

Is Humanity Ready?

This is a tough question to ask as why should some suggest humans are not ready for something? Who could say such a thing? Well, this is an important question to consider when looking at these energy technologies and putting them in the context of our current society. Technologies like Chikumbutso’s and Tewari’s leave no aspect of humanity and our society untouched. Our way of life, minds, values and beliefs would adjust as we acknowledge what these devices are doing and can do. our entire economic system would deeply need to change.

Are we open to having mysterious questions perhaps answered? Are we willing to change the way we live and relate to one another? Are we willing to forgo the limitations our current societal systems and infrastructures have thrust upon us?

Looking Deeper: 

We made a short documentary a couple of years ago year called Regenerate: Beyond The CO2 Narrative. After 10 years of researching and investigating climate change, we came to many conclusions that we felt needed to be shared, yet were extremely rare in public discourse. 

One of the most important aspects of Regenerate is that we are looking at our environment from such a limited point of view that we can’t identify the real issues we face, and that our level of thinking, or consciousness, is completely disconnected from the solutions required to truly shift our relationship with earth.

Thus, we are creating solutions that don’t truly address making the environment cleaner or better long term, and simply address the wants and desires of the political elite. Unfortunately like many other topics, climate change and environmental issues and science has become completely politicized.

New Rooftop Wind Energy Invention Is Up To 16X More Efficient Than Solar Panels

new-rooftop-wind-energy-invention-is-up-to-16x-more-efficient-than-solar-panels

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A new rooftop wind harvesting device is capable of generating 50 percent more electricity than solar panels for the same cost, according to its inventors, a Texas-based startup called Aeromine Technologies.

The new technology replaced the blades found in traditional wind turbines with an aerodynamic system that harvests energy from the airflow that’s created above a building, which makes it silent and safe for birds and other wildlife.

Love reading The Pulse? If you’re a regular reader of our work and love what we do, consider becoming a paid subscribing member and help us expand our work. You can support for as little as $5 a month and enjoy multiple member benefits. Click Here to Learn More.

These units produce the same amount of power as up to 16 solar panels. As their company website states:

Aeromine’s patented aerodynamic design captures and amplifies building airflow in wind speeds as low as 5 m.p.h., similar to the airfoils on a race car. Unlike turbines that require rotating rotor blades and many moving parts, making them prone to maintenance issues, the motionless and durable Aeromine solution generates more energy in less space.

According to Aeromine CEO David Asarnow, a veteran of the climate technology industry,

“This is a game-changer adding new value to the fast-growing rooftop power generation market, helping corporations meet their resilience and sustainability goals with an untapped distributed renewable energy source. Aeromine’s proprietary technology brings the performance of wind energy to the onsite generation market, mitigating legacy constraints posed by spinning wind turbines and less efficient solar panels.”

David Asarnow

The Aeromine system can utilize a small footprint on a building’s roof, leaving ample space for existing solar and utility infrastructure.  It provides commercial property owners, who are facing increased energy costs and rising demand for features such as electric vehicle charging stations, with an effective new tool in their drive toward energy independence.

Aeromine’s patented technology was validated through joint research with Sandia National Laboratories and Texas Tech University.

Everyday new clean and “green” technologies seem to emerge, and there’s no doubt that many of them will be implemented. Just last month we reported on an emerging technology that literally generates electricity out of thin air. These types of technologies tend to be better than wind or solar as they don’t rely on the elements.

One of the electrical engineers, Jun Yao, from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, stated that they are “literally making electricity out of thin air.”  They are calling it the “Air-gen” and it generates clean energy 24/7, thanks to the electrically conductive protein nanowires produced by Geobacter. You can read more about that here.

Our Favourite Examples

Some of our favorite technologies are ones that truly go beyond the limitations of more primitive technologies like wind and solar.

Sangulani (Maxwell) Chikumbutso, an inventor from Zimbabwe, invented an electric system that runs off a battery that charges itself with electromagnetic radiation that’s present naturally in the environment. It can run forever.

According to Maxwell’s claims, the energy to power the battery is taken from electromagnetic waves that exist all around us and are, again, naturally present in our environment. Multiple vehicles and power generators have been developed via his work.

When this story broke, a number of “fact-checkers” simply labelled it as false without any investigation or journalism being done on their part, but this doesn’t seem to be the case. You can read and learn more about his story and specific examples of technology he has developed, here.

Below is another one of our favourite examples that also includes a discussion around why truly exciting energy technologies rarely make it into mainstream conversation. We have the potential to go far beyond solar and wind power.

We explore the test results of an energy device that we have been tracking for almost a decade. Inventor Paramahamsa Tewari showing his over-unity results which are replicated by another team.

Is Humanity Ready?

This is a tough question to ask as why should some suggest humans are not ready for something? Who could say such a thing? Well, this is an important question to consider when looking at these energy technologies and putting them in the context of our current society. Technologies like Chikumbutso’s and Tewari’s leave no aspect of humanity and our society untouched. Our way of life, minds, values and beliefs would adjust as we acknowledge what these devices are doing and can do. our entire economic system would deeply need to change.

Are we open to having mysterious questions perhaps answered? Are we willing to change the way we live and relate to one another? Are we willing to forgo the limitations our current societal systems and infrastructures have thrust upon us?

Looking Deeper: 

We made a short documentary a couple of years ago year called Regenerate: Beyond The CO2 Narrative. After 10 years of researching and investigating climate change, we came to many conclusions that we felt needed to be shared, yet were extremely rare in public discourse. 

One of the most important aspects of Regenerate is that we are looking at our environment from such a limited point of view that we can’t identify the real issues we face, and that our level of thinking, or consciousness, is completely disconnected from the solutions required to truly shift our relationship with earth.

Thus, we are creating solutions that don’t truly address making the environment cleaner or better long term, and simply address the wants and desires of the political elite. Unfortunately like many other topics, climate change and environmental issues and science has become completely politicized.

Ontario College of Physicians Recommends Drugs & Psychotherapy To Combat Vaccine Hesitancy

ontario-college-of-physicians-recommends-drugs-&-psychotherapy-to-combat-vaccine-hesitancy

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Vaccine hesitancy was steadily increasing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and with the emergence of the new mRNA shots and vaccine mandates, it probably increased even more. The causes of this hesitancy is commonly attributed to “misinformation” and “fake news” according to government affiliated health agencies and legacy media. The science and evidence that has raised legitimate safety concerns with mRNA vaccines, for example, is unfortunately never really appropriately addressed or acknowledged. The mainstream continues to fail at having appropriate conversations about ‘controversial’ topics.

Political rhetoric has descended into moralizing, scapegoating, blaming and condescending language using pejorative terms. It actively promotes stigma and discrimination as tools to increase vaccination. Physicians and proponents of COVID-19 forced vaccination have also taken on this mentality throughout the pandemic, perhaps because they see the same behaviour via television programming.

Love reading The Pulse? If you’re a regular reader of our work and love what we do, consider becoming a paid subscribing member and help us expand our work. You can support for as little as $5 a month and enjoy multiple member benefits. Click Here to Learn More.

A recent notice for Physicians in Ontario, Canada for example from the Ontario College of Physicians (CPSO) reads as follows with regards to vaccine hesitancy,

“It is also important that physicians work with their patients to manage anxieties related to the vaccine and not enable avoidance behaviour. For example, for extreme fear of needles (trypanophobia) or other cases of serious concern, responsible use of prescription medications and/or referral to psychotherapy may be available options. Overall, physicians have a responsibility to allow their patients to be properly informed about vaccines and not have those anxieties empowered by an exemption.”

Now, if someone has an extreme fear of needles and that is the issue, then psychotherapy may actually be appropriate. It would be like therapy for any other phobia someone is trying to get over, for example. That being said, if their fear of COVID-19 shots is due to the risks they pose, and again, the science showing cause for concerns, then that is a completely different issue. If this is the case, psychotherapy is not needed, and physicians would be better off acknowledging and addressing these concerns instead of brushing them off as “conspiracy theories.” In some cases, many physicians may be completely unaware of the science and data that is most likely contributing to vaccine hesitancy simply because medical associations and government bodies for physicians, like the CPSO, are not relaying them to their physicians.

In fact, the CPSO website did not include the specific example of a patient with a “fear of needles,” but instead simply read that in “cases of serious concern, responsible use of prescription medications and/or referral to psychotherapy are available options.”

Below, on the left you will see the original statement.

While the CPSO website claims that physicians “have a responsibility to allow their patients to be properly informed about vaccines,” their recommendation of “medication” or “psychotherapy” for those who have concerns about the vaccine suggests a disregard for those who opted out of the shots based on other information, like the fact that a record number of serious adverse events being reported to vaccine injury surveillance systems all over the world.

In the United States for example, CDC data that was released on October 3 of this year shows approximately 783,000 people reported seeking medical attention for what they perceived to be a serious adverse reaction after getting their COVID-19 vaccine.

By not addressing these concerns, more and more people are losing trust in both physicians and federal health regulatory agencies at an exponential pace.

A Prevention & Early Treatment Guide For COVID-19

a-prevention-&-early-treatment-guide-for-covid-19

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The Canadian Covid Care Alliance is a group of more than 600 scientists, medical doctors, health care practitioners and other professionals and academics in various fields. Some of the members representing the alliance have gone public, like Dr. Steven Pelech, a professor of immunology and neurology at the University of British Columbia for 33 years. He is one of the founding members of the Biomedical Research Center at UBC. Another is Dr. Eric T. Payne, a paediatric neurologist at Alberta Children’s hospital, and Byram W. Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor and the University of Guelph.

But, as the alliance points out,

“We appreciate that inquiring minds would like to see that there are people with real expertise behind the information on CCCA’s website. However–We regret that the state of affairs, censorship of free speech, and rampant tyranny and coercion is such now in Canada that CCCA must protect the identity of its scientific, MD, academic and other health care professional (HCP) members. This serves to shield them from career-impacting reactions by their universities, professional colleges and healthcare system employers. Sadly, some of our MDs have had their medical licenses to practice suspended or restricted because they are not on board with the mainstream narrative. Likewise, some of our university professors have had their contracts terminated. These are dark times, and while we appreciate that some people want to know identities, frankly it would be hazardous to the careers of many of our members for us to reveal them.”

Canadian Covid Care Alliance.

What’s emphasized in the above quote is unfortunately the sad reality for thousands of experts around the globe. Renowned doctors and scientists who have gone public sharing evidence and opinion that opposes the government narrative have had their lives turned upside down in many ways.

That being said, it’s a great to see a group of medical professionals and scientists put together a resource for people who seek “alternative” means of treatment. Such treatment protocols are something we never see from the mainstream medical industry and federal health regulatory agencies. Furthermore, they are labelled as unproven treatments with zero efficacy, which is unfortunate because that’s simply not true. In a world where our only options are vaccines and prescription medications, many of which science has raised various safety and efficacy concerns about, it’s refreshing and assuring to come across such a guide/protocol, so please pass it on!

You can access that document HERE.

They emphasize that the document does not constitute medical advice, and to always check with your trusted healthcare provider before taking any medications or supplements or undertaking any health or lifestyle measures. If you are pregnant, taking medication or have any health conditions, getting your trusted healthcare provider’s advice is especially important.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called ‘Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.’ This 8 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Kanye West To Buy Popular Social Media Platform, Parler

kanye-west-to-buy-popular-social-media-platform,-parler

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

“This deal will change the world, and change the way the world thinks about free speech,” Parler’s CEO said in a statement about Kanye West acquiring the controversial “conservative” social media platform. The deal is expected to close before the end of 2022.

The deal comes as Parler, which launched in 2018 and positioned itself as a free speech space for those seeking an alternative to platforms such as Twitter, has been reinstated on Google and Apple’s app stores after being removed following the U.S. Capitol riots in January 2021.

Love reading The Pulse? If you’re a regular reader of our work and love what we do, consider becoming a paid subscribing member and help us expand our work. You can support for as little as $5 a month and enjoy multiple member benefits. Click Here to Learn More.

West has been no stranger to controversy himself, being restricted and banned multiple times on social media platforms, like Twitter, for various ‘controversial’ remarks. It’s not just West, we’ve seen the same thing happen to multiple people in various fields, especially during the pandemic.

Renowned doctors and scientists, for example, who were sharing science, commentary and perspectives that opposed federal health authority recommendations and information were subjected to the same censorship.

Most recently, West was locked out of his Instagram account by Facebook parent Meta Platforms for posts condemned as antisemitic. He then moved to Twitter, posting for the first time in two years.

“In a world where conservative opinions are considered to be controversial we have to make sure we have the right to freely express ourselves,” West said in a statement.

In a statement of his own, Parler CEO George Farmer added:

“Ye’s acquiring of Parler will strengthen our ability to create an uncancelable ecosystem. No one should have to self-censor out of uncertainty about which legal speech will get him or her banned. No individual or business should worry about being completely deplatformed, as Parler was, merely for the expression of opposing viewpoints. Groupthink is, and always has been, more dangerous than independent thinking. Parler will remain a place where everyone can think, listen, and speak freely. We will continue the fight against censorship, cancel culture, and authoritarianism.”

Despite the fact that Parler is known as a “conservative” platform, other media outlets that have strong ties to the “left” or “liberal” ideas, as well as mainstream media networks like CNN, are not usually labelled or considered “liberal” or “democratic” platforms. Why is that? Often times it’s as if calling something “conservative” or “right leaning” is a pejorative that is attempting to signal the idea that there is something wrong with it.

Today, we live in an ecosystem of censorship, whereby certain information is removed, labelled as “false” or ridiculed by legacy media and government. This comes as there are in fact many inappropriate, unnecessary and even dangerous posts online – posts that Big tech seems quick to remove and censor. But it seems credible posts and ideas that go against mainstream conjecture will be lumped into this category as well, quickly shutting down well intentioned and meaningful debate.

“In secret, these companies had all agreed to work with the U.S. Government far beyond what the law required of them, and that’s what we’re seeing with this new censorship push is really a new direction in the same dynamic. These companies are not obligated by the law to do almost any of what they’re actually doing but they’re going above and beyond, to, in many cases, to increase the depth of their relationship (with the government) and the government’s willingness to avoid trying to regulate them in the context of their desired activities, which is ultimately to dominate the conversation and information space of global society in different ways…They’re trying to make you change your behaviour.”

Edward Snowden, NSA Whistleblower.

As federal agencies pair up with Big Tech organizations to censor legitimate information that opposes “official” government narratives, we can see something is seriously wrong with our current culture of sensemaking.

It doesn’t matter if you are conservative or liberal, a democrat or republican, all should be standing up for free speech, and condemn the censorship of information simply because it opposes and or exposes unethical actions by governments around the world.

We will leave you with this excerpt from an article we recently published titled, “The Left/Right Divide is Obsolete” written by Haley Kynefin. It’s quite fitting.

“I was never happy with the political division of “left” vs. “right.” The words, first and foremost, are vague even in their more primitive directional sense, since their interpretation depends entirely on the orientation of their user. What is “left” from my perspective will be “right” from yours, if you are standing opposite me, so it is important first to establish a frame of reference; otherwise there is likely to be confusion. 

But from a political standpoint, it is difficult to infer any sort of value system directly from the labels themselves. And in fact, no one has ever given me a satisfactory explanation of what exactly defines them. Some say, “The left prefers big government, while the right prefers small government.” Others decree, “The left wing is socialist, the right wing is capitalist.” 

But increasingly, it seems, these labels have devolved into jumbled assortments of specific policy alignments that have nothing to do with each other, at least without internalizing a series of tenuous assumptions about what links them. The right is “pro-gun;” the left is “anti-gun;” the left is “pro-abortion;” the right is “anti-abortion;” the right is Christian; the left is secular; and so on and so forth. 

Nor does it get any better when you layer these over the top of similar terms, such as “liberal” and “conservative” or “Republican” and “Democrat,” with which the “left” and “right” has been muddied. Can there be right-wing liberals and left-wing conservatives? Republicans and Democrats refer, of course, to the parties, but although there are registered right-wing Democrats and left-wing Republicans the terms are more or less understood as equivalent to “left-wing” and “right.” And as the percentage of voters disillusioned with both parties grows, we are left asking ourselves, do these divisions still effectively mark the modern social divide?

My answer is, no. In fact, I think they do us a grave disservice by obscuring the true cultural issues of our time within outdated boxes full of loaded assumptions, unfit for purpose. And I think we urgently need a new paradigm if we are to de-escalate our political rhetoric, return to the realm of civilized discourse and understand what we are facing.”

Haley Kynefin

New Documents Show The RCMP Falsely Claimed Freedom Convoy Protestors Were Armed

new-documents-show-the-rcmp-falsely-claimed-freedom-convoy-protestors-were-armed

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

On February 14 2022, the same day the cabinet invoked the Emergencies Act in an attempt to shut down the Canadian Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) falsely claimed that the protestors were armed.

Ottawa Police Service (OPS) interim chief Steve Bell has confirmed that no weapons were found among protestors after Blacklock’s Reporter shared internal documents showing just that. Weapons were never found, and there was no reason whatsoever to assume or believe that the Freedom Convoy protestors in Ottawa were armed.

An RCMP briefing note sent to cabinet deputy ministers titled “Truckers Convoy And Protective Services” reads as follows,

Love reading The Pulse? If you’re a regular reader of our work and love what we do, consider becoming a paid subscribing member and help us expand our work. You can support for as little as $5 a month and enjoy multiple member benefits. Click Here to Learn More.

“Intelligence information also suggests that convoy protestors are beginning to weaponize themselves. Officers are constantly monitoring the shift in behaviour and will respond accordingly.”

Blacklock’s Reporter

The briefing note’s timestamp was dated 12:59 p.m. on Feb. 14. Four hours later, the Liberal government invoked the Emergencies Act, granting police authority to use extraordinary force in clearing protesters from Ottawa’s downtown core.

The RCMP briefing note also said that around 250 uniformed officers were outside Parliament and approximately 350 officers were being “deployed daily in support of our protective mandate.”

Cabinet revoked the Emergencies Act on Feb. 23, just nine days after it came into force.

On Feb. 16, while the act was still in force, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino told reporters that Freedom Convoy protesters were committing potentially “deadly” crimes. This was in reference to the Coutts border protest in Alberta.

“Dangerous criminal activity occurring away from the TV cameras and social media posts was real and organized,”

Marco Medicino

Legacy media perpetuated this lie. A Toronto Star article published on March 19 cited an anonymous police source claiming that some Freedom Convoy protesters had loaded shotguns in their trunks. This is one of several examples.

The Pulse was on the scene in Ottawa during most of the Convoy. Below is one of many pieces of footage we captured, you can find more on our YouTube channel. During the thick of things, much of our coverage was actually removed from YouTube, but it was later put back up and restored.

After the Emergencies Act was evoked, Canada also changed the “Terrorist Financing Rules”to shut down any funding going to the Freedom Convoy.

Given that we’ve seen the false claims of weaponized protestors, what can we assume about the ‘terrorism’ label when it comes to this protest?

The protest itself was very peaceful and represented love, respect, unity and freedom. Yes, there was the odd person in attendance who might have been rude to mainstream media, but this protest was made up of families and every day citizens. The downtown Ottawa streets were the safest and cleanest they had been during the protest. This does not mean some local residents were not inconvenienced by noise at times, this certainly happened, but what else are people supposed to do in a ‘democracy’ that does not listen to them?

Regardless of how inviting and peaceful this was, mainstream media and government labelled the protest as dangerous and unruly. This added to the fear some local residents, who never went to see it for themselves. The ones that did, changed their mind very quickly and many even joined in the cause.

Multiple polls actually showed that a large number of Canadians actually supported the movement and cause, which was to end all mandates and respect freedom of choice.

These new documents showing that the RCMP falsely claimed that Freedom Convoy protestors weren’t actually armed is important as it shows the Canadian government went to extreme measures, including lying and spreading false information, to shut down something that was so threatening to them.

Without labelling these protests as something dangerous, the government would not have been able to evoke the emergencies measures act to shut down a movement that was a political threat on a global scale. What these protestors were representing and calling for, and the scale of the Freedom Convoy itself, was a threat to government mandates all over the world as it indicated the positions of massive portions of people, “not fringe minorities.”

Here at The Pulse we have been actively engaged in FOIA requests to different branches of the Canadian government regarding the Freedom Convoy. Documents we received from the Canadian Security & Intelligence Service regarding the Freedom Convoy via the Freedom of Information Act. The documents were widely redacted, as expected, but still contained some interesting takeaways. Some of the documents showed that the government also linked the Freedom Convoy to ‘Domestic Terrorism.’

We expect more documents in the coming months so stay tuned.

Below is a more accurate depiction of what took place during the Freedom Convoy.

As more awaken to the nature of legacy media coverage, they begin to seek out more complete coverage and depictions of world events. This is beginning of a process of questioning the nature of propaganda in our own countries.

We’re living in a time where if you disagree with the government in the West, you can be silenced, censored, and ridiculed, not to mention losing some of your basic rights and freedoms. That being said, change is in the air and in multiple countries we see more and more people rising up against governments who take such authoritarian and oppressive measures under the guise of good will.