Lies of the gurus, a/k/a the “lunatic fringe.”


By Anna Von Reitz

Larry– the Law of these United States is the American Common Law.  As of 1954 the courts that we now deal with stopped accepting Common Law pleas and started accepting only statutory pleas. There is no more sure or binding proof of the nature and jurisdiction of these courts than the nature of the pleas being heard by them. So we may conclude with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY that: (1) these are not the courts the people of this country ordained and are owed and (2) that these are Maritime Courts. 
From these  facts then we can conclude that every “Plaintiff” and “Defendant” being addressed by these courts is not a living “Person” and that our most basic identity as one of the living people has been unlawfully and unconscionably converted to that of a business. We have been “impersonated”– literally.  And when we face charges   in these courts we are suffering barratry because of these false presumptions.  
Both the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States are foreign entities with respect to us and both have created “franchises” for themselves named after us.  These franchises created by infringing upon our Common Law copyright to our own given names are what are being addressed as Defendants  and represented as Plaintiffs in these various courts. 
The more typical cases are being addressed to franchises of the Municipal United States. These PERSONS are slaves as defined in the 14th Amendment to the Municipal Constitution and they are guilty and liable for the Public Debt by definition— so Eazy Pickens for the COURTS and their OFFICERS who put on a show and appearance of justice when in fact they are only deciding how much the poor bugger will be fined and how long he will be jailed. 
This is the reality and this is the shameful, deceitful, deplorable estate to which your profession has sunk in this country: institutionalize crimes of knowing impersonation and barratry based on equally purposeful and malicious falsification of public records. 
I call down the wrath of Heaven on the worshipers of Ba-El who have done this.  I expose them as the frauds and charlatans they have been and have willfully become.
That includes you, Larry, because you have cause to know all these things and yet you are dishonest about them and try to obfuscate the facts. 
It’s perfectly true that Admiralty Law is the creature of the High Seas jurisdiction.  It is perfectly true that it only applies on the “High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways” in the country. 
But it is also true that since 1933 we have all been “presumed” to be “inhabiting” that watery jurisdiction and to be “missing, lost at sea”, so that, conveniently, all that remains are ESTATES and Public Trusts named after us, which the members of the Bar Associations seize upon and “administer” for “salvage” purposes. 
Larry, you need to have a fire hose of truth applied up your ass and if you keep raising your head around me or in reference to what I am telling people, that is what you are going to get each and every time you open your mouth.  So if you really want to protect the trade secrets of the Bar Association I suggest you be quiet and not give me such an obvious platform for exposing everything you say and do. 


On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 7:50 AM Larry <becraft@hiwaay.net> wrote:

Hey Jungles,

Since this country obtained its independence, the courts, state and
federal, have clearly outlined the reach and scope of admiralty law: it
applies here in America to the high seas as well as navigable interstate
waters. This is BROADER than admiralty jurisdiction via English law at
the time of the Revolution, and admiralty law as then applied in England
was limited to the high seas.

American courts have addressed the issue of where there is admiralty
jurisdiction for more than 200 years. A crane onboard a ship unloading a
its cargo is operating in admiralty jurisdiction, but a crane located on
a pier next to the ship is not. To claim that admiralty law applies
“terrene” (on land) and applies everywhere is utterly baseless, at least
if you base your conclusion on what American courts have decided and
what American lawyers know with certainty.

But, let’s not overlook the “lunatic fringe.” There are con artists like
Jordan Maxwell who, contrary to what you can learn in a few short
paragraphs of a law review article, claim that “everything is
admiralty.” This is a blatant lie and there is not a lawyer in America
who believes that “everything is admiralty” because they learned in the
first year of law school otherwise. And the evidence that “everything is
NOT admiralty” is everywhere.  Obviously, the gurus promoting this
argument are liars. You have either been deceived, or you are one of
“them.”

The gurus are liars, con men, crooks and thieves and should be treated as
such. I discuss some of them here:

http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/Scams.htm

Larry, Chairman
Committee to Lynch the Gurus