Catherine Austin Fitts – Family Financial Disclosure Form for COVID-19 Injections

Catherine Austin Fitts , president of Solari, Inc., publisher of the Solari Report, and managing member of Solari Investment Advisory Services, LLC., has created a Family Financial Disclosure Form for COVID-19 Injections — also known as the “Sane Person’s Guidebook.” Below we have reposted the form. We will include a link to the website for your convenience at the end of the post.


Family Financial Disclosure Form for COVID-19 Injections – March 1, 2021

Disclaimer: This form is provided to facilitate effective family due diligence, communication, and planning. It is essential that each person and each family take responsibility to identify and access the information they believe to be most relevant to their situation and decisions, and take responsibility to assess and manage their individual and collective risk as they believe best.



The goal of this Family Financial Form is to ensure that an adverse event or death of one family member does not translate into long-lived or permanent financial destruction for the entire family.

This form was created to assist families to communicate regarding and to prepare for the family-wide financial impact of adverse events, if any, resulting from a Covid-19 injection. Examples of adverse events from Covid-19 injections include Covid-19 infection; anaphylaxis; neurological disorders; autoimmune disorders; other long-term chronic diseases; blindness and deafness; infertility, fetal damage, miscarriage, and stillbirth; and death (see Table 1 for examples of each).

Traditionally, informed consent forms for vaccination do not provide disclosure or statistics related to financial costs of possible injury, disability, or death, nor do they discuss the impact on family time, resources, health, and wealth—impacts that may include reduced career potential, divorce, and effects on siblings’ education and future plans.

Consequently, it is essential that prior to receiving a Covid-19 injection, parents and family members with financial responsibility for children and spouses not only perform thorough due diligence—providing adequate disclosures to their families regarding the potential costs to family members of adverse events or death—but also take steps to protect themselves and family members from the material adverse financial consequences of an adverse event or death.


What Are the Covid-19 Injections?


The leading Covid-19 injections currently in use in the U.S. and other OECD countries are experimental messenger RNA (mRNA) injections developed by Pfizer (with German partner BioNTech) and by biotechnology company Moderna (in partnership with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases). The two experimental products are being distributed through emergency use authorizations (called “conditional marketing authorization” in the EU and “provisional approval” in Australia) granted following abbreviated clinical trials and without long-term safety testing. As yet, neither injection has received full approval or licensure from the FDA or any other national regulatory agency.

Though marketed as “vaccinations,” the Covid-19 mRNA injections are experimental gene therapy. Vaccine developers openly describe the never-before-authorized mRNA approach as a means of “programming a person’s cells”1 or, using Moderna’s terminology, deploying new “software.”2 In prior research, mRNA injections have displayed an intrinsic inflammatory component that has made it difficult to establish an “acceptable” risk/benefit profile.3

The mRNA approach requires an in-built “gene delivery system” (also called a “carrier system”) to deliver the synthetic mRNA into the cells’ cytoplasm before the mRNA breaks down. The Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) for this purpose; the LNPs not only shield the mRNA and promote cellular uptake but also function as adjuvants, “revving up” the immune system. Pfizer’s and Moderna’s LNPs are coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG), a synthetic, nondegradable, and controversial polymer associated with adverse immune responses. Moderna acknowledges that its LNPs “could lead to significant adverse events.”4 The FDA has identified PEG as the possible culprit responsible for anaphylactic reactions to the Covid-19 injections.5

In late February, the FDA authorized a third Covid-19 injection for emergency use in the U.S., manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Belgium-based pharmaceutical subsidiary, Janssen. J&J’s injection is an “adenovirus-vectored” vaccine that, like the mRNA injections, is intended to “trick” the cells into making coronavirus spike protein. The injection uses a genetically modified live common cold virus as a Trojan horse to “shuttle” spike protein DNA (genetic instructions) into human cells. In late 2019, the FDA approved an adenovirus-vectored Ebola injection, and the technology has also been featured in experimental—and problematic—Zika and HIV injections.6 The J&J Covid-19 injection is the first adenovirus-vectored injection to be authorized (on an emergency basis) for general population use.7

In Europe, the EU has granted conditional marketing authorization to a different adenovirus-vectored Covid-19 injection—using an adenovirus that usually infects chimpanzees—developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford. AstraZeneca called several time-outs during its Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials because trial participants developed transverse myelitis, a condition that damages the insulating material around nerves8 and is associated with pain, muscle weakness, paralysis, and bowel and bladder problems; two-thirds of the individuals who experience it remain permanently disabled.

Dozens of other Covid-19 injections are under development, including RNA-based, DNA-based, and viral vector injections as well as injections using other technologies.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has granted emergency authorization to both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca Covid-19 injections, opening the door for the injections to begin rolling out in poorer countries.


Adverse Event Reporting


As these Covid-19 injections are new, adverse event reporting is still in its early stages. However, compilations of news accounts9 and reports submitted to national databases such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the U.S.10 11 already provide representative information about the Covid-19 injections’ potential health impact. See Table 2 for a list of selected public databases that make reports of adverse events available to the public and/or are collecting reports of injuries and deaths following Covid-19 injection.


From: [Adult Family Member]

To: [Adult Spouse and Children]



I have completed my due diligence on the Covid-19 injection that I propose to take.

____ I have reviewed the available databases provided of material adverse events from Covid-19 injections, including deaths reported to date for people who have received these injections.

____ I understand that this Covid-19 injection is being distributed under an emergency use authorization and that it has not been approved by [FDA/national regulatory agency].

____ I understand that this Covid-19 injection is made by:

___ Moderna – a company that in 10 years had never brought a single product to market prior to the coronavirus vaccine12

___ Pfizer – a company with a demonstrated history of enforcement settlements for fraudulent marketing13

___ Johnson & Johnson – a company with a demonstrated record of health care fraud14

___ AstraZeneca – a company that paid one of the top 10 pharmaceutical company settlements ever15

____ If Pfizer or Moderna: I understand that this Covid-19 injection is an experimental gene therapy.

____ I understand that the injection has only been designed to protect against moderate symptoms of Covid-19 and that it may not protect me from more severe symptoms.16

____ I understand that Covid-19 injections may not protect against transmission.17

____ I understand that by agreeing to this injection, I may be required to take further Covid-19 injections as indicated by the manufacturer’s protocol or requirements, including potential annual “booster shots.”18

____ I understand that this Covid-19 injection is not designed to address mutating versions or additional variants of the coronavirus.

____ I have attached a copy of the manufacturer’s fact sheet [traditionally called a package insert] for the Covid-19 injection, which states that the injections are not FDA-approved, describes the ingredients, outlines potential material adverse events, and acknowledges that not all risks are known. I am willing, able, and available to review and explain the fact sheet to you.



Johnson & Johnson:


____ I also understand that prior to Covid-19 injection, health care providers are legally required to communicate information “consistent with the fact sheets” to patients and either provide a hard copy or direct patients to the appropriate website.

____ I understand that because some of the ingredients of these Covid-19 injections are proprietary and may, therefore, be secret, the ingredients listed in the manufacturers’ fact sheets may be incomplete. I also understand that prior research on other vaccines has demonstrated the presence of nanoparticles, heavy metals, fetal tissue, and other substances not disclosed (or not fully disclosed) in “vaccinations.”19

____ [U.S. only] I understand that under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the 2005 PREP Act, it will be difficult if not impossible to hold the manufacturer of this Covid-19 injection responsible for any damage to my health or death resulting from this injection.20

____ [Non-U.S.] I have reviewed the policies or agreements in place in my country regarding indemnification and compensation; I understand that depending on these policies or agreements, it may be difficult if not impossible to hold the manufacturer of this Covid-19 injection responsible for any damage to my health or for death resulting from this injection.

____ I understand that it will be difficult if not impossible to hold the health institutions, doctors, and nurses that distributed this Covid-19 injection to me responsible for any damage to my health or for my death.

____ I understand that it will be difficult if not impossible to hold federal, state, and local health care officials and regulators responsible for any damage to my health from the Covid-19 injection or for my death.

____ I understand, therefore, as a practical matter that I and my closest relatives will experience and shoulder the full cost in terms of time and money of any financial adverse impact of a material adverse event resulting from my taking this Covid-19 injection.


For Families Planning on Having Additional Children

____ Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 injections: I understand that this injection has the potential to alter my DNA in ways that no one yet understands and that this injection could alter the DNA of my unborn children or any woman who carries my unborn children.

____ Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 injections: I understand that knowledgeable experts have shared serious concerns in a petition filed with the European Medicines Agency that components of the Covid-19 mRNA injections could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, a protein responsible for development of the placenta and essential for a successful pregnancy, resulting in potential infertility.21

____ Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 injection: I understand that this injection is produced in genetically modified human embryonic retinal cells (PER.C6 TetR) and that the presence of fetal DNA fragment contaminants in injections has been linked to autism spectrum disorder.22

____ AstraZeneca Covid-19 injection: I understand that this injection is produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293).

____ My spouse has agreed to assume the risks of such alterations of my DNA and any impact it may have on our ability to have children or on our unborn children.


Material Adverse Events

____ I understand and have reviewed the material adverse events reported in connection with the Covid-19 injections. Known adverse events include Covid-19 infection; anaphylaxis; neurological disorders; autoimmune disorders; other long-term chronic diseases; blindness and deafness; infertility, fetal damage, miscarriage, and stillbirth; and death (see Table 1 for examples of each; see also endnote #9).


Reasons for Taking Injection

____ I understand that Covid-19 has a statistical probability of death23 of 0.003% for youth (ages 0-19), 0.02% for those ages 20-49, 0.5% for individuals aged 50-69, and 5.4% for seniors age 70 and older.24

____ I also understand that there are multiple, low-cost, non-injection therapeutic drug protocols for early intervention and prophylaxis that have a high rate of success in helping defend against or recover from Covid-19.25

____ Nevertheless, I want to take these Covid-19 injections. The reason(s) why is (are):




____ Due to the difficulties of accessing the appropriate care in an emergency, I have identified and arranged health care providers who will be available on a timely basis in the event of a material adverse event from the Covid-19 injection:

Covid-19 Infection

Contact Info:


Contact Info:

Neurological Disorders

Contact Info:

Autoimmune Disorders

Contact Info:

Other Long-term Chronic Diseases

Contact Info:

Blindness and Deafness:

Contact Info:

Infertility, Fetal Damage, Miscarriage, and Stillbirth (women only)

Contact Info:




____ I have reviewed the Aging with Dignity planning process and filled out the Five Wishes planning form ( and and have provided a Health Care Proxy to you along with detailed instructions on resuscitation and extreme measures at end of life.

____ I have reviewed this form with the following people who have authority in my Health Care Proxy and have agreed to assume responsibility in the event of a material adverse event or death resulting from the Covid-19 injection.

[List Here]




In the event of a material adverse event from Covid-19 injection, my health care insurance ___ will cover ___ will not cover all health care and hospitalization expenses.

My insurance broker has confirmed that page ___ of my ____ policy states that taking an experimental or emergency-use Covid-19 injection ___ will ___ will not impact my insurance coverage.

In the event that I am unable to work for a period of time or lose my job, profession, or business, my disability insurance will cover the following amounts for ___ months/years:


I have reviewed my decision with my insurance broker and additional health care and disability or other insurance ___ is available ___ is not available to cover any material adverse event from a Covid-19 injection on the following basis:


In the event of my death from Covid-19 injection, my life insurance will provide the following protection to you:


I have reviewed my decision with my insurance broker and additional life insurance ___ is available ___ is not available to cover any material adverse event or death from Covid-19 injection on the following basis: 26


____ I have provided sufficient time and resources for my family and I to arrange for other available insurance that my family members and I believe are prudent.




Loss of Income

In the event of a material adverse event from Covid-19 injection, the potential range in the loss of income is estimated to be [provide range if unable to work for 1 year, 5 years, or permanently]:

Covid-19 Infection: _________________________________________________

Anaphylaxis: _________________________________________________

Neurological Disorder: _________________________________________________

Autoimmune Disorder: _________________________________________________

Other Long-term
Chronic Disease:
27 _________________________________________________

Blindness & Deafness: _________________________________________________

Infertility, Fetal Damage,
Miscarriage, Stillbirth
(women only):

Death: _________________________________________________


Health Care Expenses

In the event of a material adverse event from Covid-19 injection, the potential range of health care expenses not covered by our health care insurance is estimated to be [estimate potential expenses for 1 year, 5 years, or long-term]:

Covid-19 Infection: _________________________________________________

Anaphylaxis: _________________________________________________

Neurological Disorder: _________________________________________________

Autoimmune Disorder: _________________________________________________

Other Long-term
Chronic Disease:
28 _________________________________________________

Blindness & Deafness: _________________________________________________

Infertility, Fetal Damage,
Miscarriage, Stillbirth
(women only):

Death: _________________________________________________


Long-Term Care

If a material adverse event from a Covid-19 injection results in the need for long-term care, this is how I propose to arrange such care and fund it: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Investment of Family Time

In the event of a material adverse event from a Covid-19 injection, here is the time I would request from my family or professional caregivers paid by my family to assist me:

Covid-19 Infection: _________________________________________________

Anaphylaxis: _________________________________________________

Neurological Disorder: _________________________________________________

Autoimmune Disorder: _________________________________________________

Other Long-term
Chronic Disease:

Blindness & Deafness: _________________________________________________

Infertility, Fetal Damage,
Miscarriage, Stillbirth
(women only):

Death: _________________________________________________


Proposed Sources of Financial Support

If a material adverse event from a Covid-19 injection results in adverse financial events—loss of income and/or increased expenses—these are my estimates of costs and my arrangements to fund them:

Covid-19 Infection: _________________________________________________

Anaphylaxis: _________________________________________________

Neurological Disorder: _________________________________________________

Autoimmune Disorder: _________________________________________________

Other Long-term
Chronic Disease:

Blindness & Deafness: _________________________________________________

Infertility, Fetal Damage,
Miscarriage, Stillbirth
(women only):

Death: _________________________________________________




____ In the event of my death from a Covid-19 injection, I have finalized an estate plan, have reviewed it with my attorney and executor, and have provided instructions for my funeral and disposition of my remains as follows:

Having completed my due diligence on the Covid-19 injection and having made my decision to proceed, I am available to review my findings and arrangements with my family.

I am responsible for my health care choices and am committed to taking responsibility for the true costs of my choices and their impact on those I love and not shifting these costs and risks to them without their full knowledge, due diligence, and consent.

Please let me know when you would like to review and discuss.

Your loving [spouse/parent]




TABLE 1. Examples of Adverse Events Reported Following Covid-19 Injections


Note: For further examples, see endnote #9.

Covid-19 Infection


1. Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine – reports (January 1, 2021)

2. 4,500 people diagnosed with COVID after getting 1st vaccine dose (January 12, 2021)

3. Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease



4. VAERS COVID reports

5. One-third of deaths reported to CDC after COVID vaccines occurred within 48 hours of vaccination (VAERS data through February 12, 2021)

6. COVID vaccine injury reports grow in number, but trends remain consistent (March 5, 2021)

7. FDA investigates allergic reactions to Pfizer COVID vaccine after more healthcare workers hospitalized (December 21, 2020)

8. Metro healthcare worker describes severe allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccine (January 14, 2021)

9. California shelves batch of Moderna vaccines over allergy concerns (January 18, 2021)

Neurological Disorders


10. I took the Moderna mRNA vaccine without doing my own research (February 19, 2021)

11. Louisiana woman convulsing after Pfizer experimental Covid vaccine (January 14, 2021)

12. The intertwined history of myelitis and vaccines [AstraZeneca/Oxford] (September 25, 2020)

Autoimmune Disorders


13. Professor and molecular genetics expert Dolores Cahill expects autoimmune reactions to result from the mRNA injections “months later,” stating that “this gene therapy…is setting up an autoimmune disease chronically.”29

14. Immunologist Bart Classen—who has been issuing warnings for years about chronic, late-occurring adverse events from vaccination—is concerned that the mRNA injections could create new mechanisms of vaccine adverse events. Classen notes that adverse events such as type 1 diabetes “may not occur until 3-4 years after a vaccine is administered.”30

15. Are we on the verge of a “super-epidemic” of autoimmune diseases? (February 19, 2021)

16. Vaccination and autoimmune diseases: is prevention of adverse health effects on the horizon? (July 20, 2017)

17. The intertwined history of myelitis and vaccines [AstraZeneca clinical trial participant diagnosed with multiple sclerosis] (September 25, 2020)

Long-term Chronic Disease


18. Immunologist Bart Classen—who has been issuing warnings for years about chronic, late-occurring adverse events from vaccination—is concerned that the mRNA injections could create new mechanisms of vaccine adverse events. Classen notes that adverse events such as type 1 diabetes “may not occur until 3-4 years after a vaccine is administered.”31

19. 32-year-old Mexican doctor suffers seizures and is paralyzed after receiving the Pfizer experimental vaccine (December 30, 2020)

Blindness and Deafness


20. United Kingdom: 12 people deaf, five blind after Pfizer BioNTech mRNA shots (February 11, 2021)

Infertility, Fetal Damage, Miscarriage, and Stillbirth (women only)


21. Eight unborn babies dead soon after their mothers received COVID-19 vaccine (as of January 22, 2021)

22. Sara Beltrán Ponce: Wisconsin resident doctor has miscarriage days after COVID “vaccine” (February 7, 2021)

23. Health officials push pregnant women to get COVID shots, despite known risks (February 23, 2021)



24. Johns Hopkins scientist: “A medical certainty” Pfizer vaccine caused death of Florida doctor (January 3, 2021)

25. Sara Stickles: 28-year-old has brain aneurysm, dead five days after second Pfizer mRNA shot (February 12, 2021)

26. Death of pediatric assistant two days after receiving Covid vaccine puts Portuguese health authorities “on alert” (January 1, 2021)

27. Dottore si vaccina in diretta TV e muore dopo pochi giorni, ma “non di Covid” [Doctor gets vaccinated on live TV and dies a few days later, but “not of Covid”] (February 27, 2021)

28. One-third of deaths reported to CDC after COVID vaccines occurred within 48 hours of vaccination (VAERS reports through February 12, 2021)

29. Experimental vaccine death rate for Israel’s elderly 40 times higher than COVID-19 deaths: researchers (March 1, 2021)

30. UK data show 402 reports of deaths following COVID vaccines (March 2, 2021)


TABLE 2. Public Databases Compiling Reports of Adverse Events


UK Medical Freedom Alliance (UKMFA) (global)

See UKMFA Collated Data – Adverse Reactions Summary document

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (United States)

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a highly flawed voluntary reporting system co-administered by the CDC and FDA. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny estimates that reporting of adverse events to VAERS represents approximately 10% of actual adverse events. A Harvard study commissioned in 2010 by the federal government produced an even lower estimate, stating that less than 1% of adverse events get reported:

VAERS reports are accessible through the CDC Wonder search engine or through the more user-friendly MedAlerts search engine maintained by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). MedAlerts also offers more powerful search capabilities and more extensive reporting.


VaxxTracker describes itself as a “repository for vaccine adverse effects.” The site collects adverse event reports and provides data summaries with monthly counts, top 10 reaction types, outcomes, descriptions of symptoms, and more.

Children’s Health Defense

Children’s Health Defense encourages those who experience vaccine injuries to report the adverse event to VAERS and as well as to Children’s Health Defense.

The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) also collects reports of Covid-19 vaccine injuries. Recognizing that “Potential safety issues may not be disclosed or fully disclosed to individuals receiving these experimental products,” ICAN can “assist in investigating whether [individuals] have been adequately warned of the potential injury.”


The European Medicines Agency maintains a database of suspected adverse drug reactions that is accessible to the general public (see box for “Healthcare professionals, patients and the general public”). Under the letter “C,” Covid-19 reports can be generated for the Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca injections. As of February 23, 2021, EudraVigilance had received over 71,000 suspected adverse reaction reports for the Pfizer injection, almost 9,000 for the AstraZeneca injection, and over 2,500 for the Moderna injection.




1 See “COVID-19 vaccine candidates show gene therapy is a viable strategy.” American Society of Gene + Cell Therapy, November 17, 2020.

6 See Buchbinder et al., “Use of adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccines: a cautionary tale,” published in The Lancet in October 2020:

7 An informative description of the FDA’s “lackluster” emergency use authorization proceedings for the J&J injection is available here: For a basic comparison of mRNA and adenovirus vector injections, see:

9 A sample of news reports:

10/26/20, South Korea: Singapore halts use of flu vaccines after 48 die in South Korea

12/27/20, Germany, Ansbach: Vaccination in Darmstadt-Dieburg district begins in Asbach – Number of Corona deaths in Darmstadt-Dieburg explodes

01/01/21, Israel: 4 people died and 240 got COVID19 in Israel after being injected with Pfizer experimental mRNA vaccine

01/04/21, Iceland: 3 deaths after receiving Covid19 vaccine in Iceland

01/04/21, Portugal: “Perfectly healthy” 41-year-old pediatric assistant dies suddenly after injected with experimental Pfizer COVID vaccine

01/05/21, Israel: Israeli woman diagnosed with Bell’s palsy after taking Covid-19 vaccination

01/05/21, Canada: 27-year-old Canadian healthcare worker faints and suffers multiple seizures after Pfizer experimental COVID vaccine

01/05/21, USA: Hundreds sent to emergency room after receiving COVID-19 vaccines

01/05/21, Mexico: 32-year-old Mexican doctor suffers seizures and is paralyzed after receiving the Pfizer experimental vaccine

01/06/21, Norway: Norway investigating death of two people who received Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine

01/07/21, USA: “Very healthy 56-year-old” Miami obstetrician dies after being injected with the experimental Pfizer COVID vaccine

01/07/21, USA: CDC reveals at least 21 Americans have suffered life threatening allergic reactions to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine

01/08/21, Norway: 82-year-old resident at Sola nursing home dies one day after being vaccinated against COVID-19

01/10/21, Israel: Young man develops “rare life-threatening syndrome” after Covid-19 vaccine

01/10/21, Germany: 10 dead in Germany within 4 days of Covid-19 vaccine inoculation; probe ordered

01/11/21, USA: Nurse develops facial paralysis after Covid-19 vaccination

01/11/21, India: 42-year-old Indian dies after vaccination

01/12/21, USA: 24 Corona deaths in New York nursing home after vaccination

01/12/21, Germany: 55-year-old dead 10 days after vaccination,h_180,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/Bildschirmfoto%202021-01-22%20um%2014_22_08_pn.webp

01/12/21, Israel: Corona explosion after vaccination

01/13/21, Israel: 75-year-old Israeli woman found lifeless hours after second dose of Covid-19 vaccine

01/13/21, Germany: 89-year-old dies about an hour after receiving Corona vaccine,-89jaehrige-verstirbt-rund-eine-stunde-nach-coronaimpfung-_arid,1953707.html?fbclid=IwAR3CR874Dr9qsDxtPkS1f-Ceb_wpfv4BPlNvraxUQDgk9p19RrrHTdMC-v0

01/14/21, USA: Louisiana woman suffers uncontrollable convulsions after getting experimental Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine

01/14/21, USA: Moderna victim, convulsions all over body

01/14/21, USA: Woman suffers whole body convulsions after taking experimental Moderna COVID-19 vaccine

01/14/21, Germany: Ten people die after Covid vaccination

01/15/21, Germany: Paul Ehrlich Institute: 7 people have died in connection with vaccination as of 01/10/2021. So far 51 serious vaccination reactions.

01/15/21, France: Severe adverse reactions in 30 cases after Covid-19 vaccination,h_180,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/Bildschirmfoto%202021-01-22%20um%2014_24_50_pn.webp

01/15/21, France: Elderly man in French care home dies two hours after receiving the vaccine and

01/15/21, Israel: 4500 Corona infected after vaccination

01/15/21, France, Nice: 50 dead in home after vaccination

01/15/21, USA: Public health agency confirms 29 dangerous reactions to CoV vaccine

01/16/21, Israel: 13 Israelis suffer facial paralysis after taking Pfizer Covid jab

01/16/21, Germany: German nursing home sees Corona outbreak after vaccines

01/16/21, Norway: Scandal in Norway’s nursing homes: 23 deaths after Covid vaccinations

01/17/21, USA: 55 people died after receiving COVID-19 vaccine and 1388 in emergency departments

10 As of Feb 12, 2021, 15,923 adverse events, including 929 deaths had been reported to VAERS. Data may reflect serious delays in reporting. See example:

@ke11ybender: 45 yr old Angelia was hospitalized for seizures following COVID vaccination. She was diagnosed w/ right frontal lobe brain damage. The CDC was delayed in contacted [sic] her due to a month long backlog of adverse reaction reports.
Angelia Gipson Desselle, February 18 at 4:19 PM: The CDC finally called me today and have assigned someone to my case. She told me they have a month long back log of people having adverse reactions… that alone is a big eye opener. I am not alone in this. Apparently there’s a lot of us. I personally have connected to 5 people just like me. Although today was a bad one… that call meant so much!

11 Dr. Sherri Tenpenny estimates that reporting of adverse events to VAERS represents approximately 10% of actual adverse events. A Harvard study commissioned in 2010 by the federal government produced an even lower estimate, stating that less than 1% of adverse events get reported:

12 See Motley Fool’s three “red flags”: In the company’s briefing document reviewed by the FDA (, page 15, tables 7 and 8), Moderna admits to a *23.9%* rate of adverse events. Among the 15,185 people in the study, there were 3,632 adverse events in the first 28 days, statistics that do not include the longer-term effects of DNA modification, infertility, autoimmunity, etc.

13 See “Softball Pfizer vaccine rollout interview goes horribly wrong,”

14 Johnson & Johnson is facing billions in payouts for marketing baby powder known for decades to be tainted with cancer-causing asbestos. See, for example, For details on health care fraud related to Risperdal and other drugs, see

15 AstraZeneca paid the settlement after illegally marketing an anti-psychotic drug to children and the elderly. See

16 See Peter Doshi and Eric Topol, “These coronavirus trials don’t answer the one question we need to know,” The New York Times, September 22, 2020. We may not find out whether the vaccines prevent moderate or severe cases of Covid-19.

17 See and


19 In 2017, Italian researchers reviewed the ingredients of 44 types of so-called “vaccines.” They discovered heavy metal debris and biological contamination in every human vaccine they tested. The researchers stated, “The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us.” They then drew the obvious conclusion, namely, that because the micro- and nanocontaminants were “neither biocompatible nor biodegradable,” they were “biopersistent” and could cause inflammatory effects right away—or later. From, “The Injection Fraud: It’s Not a Vaccine” by Catherine Austin Fitts: Analyses of aborted fetal cell lines in “vaccines” identified abnormal human DNA, including genes associated with cancer, in all samples analyzed in quantities “up to 300 times higher than the limit imposed by the [European Medicines Agency] for carcinogenic DNA.” From, “New data shows DNA from aborted fetal cell lines in vaccines” by the Corvelva team,

20 In the U.S., individuals injured by Covid-19 injections may apply for compensation from the little-known Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). However, the program has a one-year statute of limitations and does not compensate for pain and suffering or attorneys’ fees. Over the past decade, the CICP has rejected 92% of claims submitted. See and


22 Theresa Deisher et al., “Epidemiologic and molecular relationship between vaccine manufacture and autism spectrum disorder prevalence,”

23 See Table 1 in

24 See CDC statistics here: Additional sources of statistics can be found at Swiss Policy Research ( and Children’s Health Defense (

25 See, for example, “Review of the emerging evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19”:


27 In a panel for a screening of the film Vaxxed, one U.S. mother claimed that a seriously vaccine-injured child would cost $5 million present value over their lifetime. A WHO report dated March 21, 2014 “Initial data from studies in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America indicate that estimated lifetime costs of caring for individuals with autism spectrum disorders lie between US$ 1.4 million and US$ 2.4 million per case according to the level of intellectual impairment” (page 2, item 11). The WHO report adds that “The reduction in family earnings due to the need to provide care for family members with autism spectrum disorders compounds the problem.” A 2015 study by University of California–Davis health economists estimated that autism’s annual costs in the U.S. could reach $500 billion—and potentially $1 trillion—by 2025:

28 See endnote 27.



31 See endnote 30.




Family Financial Disclosure Form for COVID-19 Injections


About Catherine:

Catherine Austin Fitts is the president of Solari, Inc., publisher of the Solari Report, and managing member of Solari Investment Advisory Services, LLC. Catherine served as managing director and member of the board of directors of the Wall Street investment bank Dillon, Read & Co. Inc., as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in the first Bush Administration, and was the president of Hamilton Securities Group, Inc. Catherine has designed and closed over $25 billion of transactions and investments to-date and has led portfolio and investment strategy for $300 billion of financial assets and liabilities.

Celebrities/Politicians Lining up for the COVID-19 Vaccine Marketing Campaign

They’re Coming out in Droves in Support of the Experimental COVID19 Vaccine

Celebrities are coming out in droves to support, encourage (coerce?) and perpetuate the narrative (lies?) that the establishment keeps force feeding to the public. As they knowingly or unknowingly support the deceptive COVID19 scenario, the institutions behind the plot continue to censor anything that offers evidence, statistics, facts, support, expert knowledge, etc., that counters the narrative.

Well “Hello Dolly!”

Parton switches her famous enchantress  “Jolene” for a new jezebel called “Vaccine”

Gervais won’t Go Out without It!

In Partnership with Big Corporate WalMart, Katie Couric promotes Vaccines

(even encouraging getting both the flu vaccine and the COVID19 vaccine)


Schwarzenegger, “Come with Me if you want to Live.” Arnold uses Terminator Lingo to Sway the Masses to Vaccinate.

Mandel encourages all to Vaccinate


Funny Man and Elder Bob Newhart at Age 91 Gets the COVID19 Shot


and if you have not had enough of the COVID19 Marketing Charade:

Entertainment Online Gives Us a Whole Treasure Trove of Famous Beings Doing the COVID19 Vaccine Marketing Two Step

See Celebrities and Politicians Receiving the COVID-19 Vaccine

President-Elect Joe Biden received the vaccine for the coronavirus on Monday, Dec. 21, alongside wife Dr. Jill Biden. See more public figures and celebrities that were vaccinated here.

31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the Vaccine



The following list was created by the Israeli rabbi Chananya Weissman

31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the Vaccine


It’s not a vaccine. A vaccine by definition provides immunity to a disease. This does not provide immunity to anything. In a best-case scenario, it merely reduces the chance of getting a severe case of a virus if one catches it. Hence, it is a medical treatment, not a vaccine. I do not want to take a medical treatment for an illness I do not have.


The drug companies, politicians, medical establishment, and media have joined forces to universally refer to this as a vaccine when it is not one, with the intention of manipulating people into feeling safer about undergoing a medical treatment. Because they are being deceitful, I do not trust them, and want nothing to do with their medical treatment.


The presumed benefits of this medical treatment are minimal and would not last long in any case. The establishment acknowledges this, and is already talking about additional shots and ever-increasing numbers of new “vaccines” that would be required on a regular basis. I refuse to turn myself into a chronic patient who receives injections of new pharmaceutical products on a regular basis simply to reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus that these injections do not even prevent.


I can reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus by strengthening my immune system naturally. In the event I catch a virus, there are vitamins and well-established drugs that have had wonderful results in warding off the illness, without the risks and unknowns of this medical treatment.


The establishment insists that this medical treatment is safe. They cannot possibly know this because the long-term effects are entirely unknown, and will not be known for many years. They may speculate that it is safe, but it is disingenuous for them to make such a claim that cannot possibly be known. Because they are being disingenuous, I do not trust them, and I want no part of their treatment.


The drug companies have zero liability if anything goes wrong, and cannot be sued. Same for the politicians who are pushing this treatment. I will not inject myself with a new, experimental medical device when the people behind it accept no liability or responsibility if something goes wrong. I will not risk my health and my life when they refuse to risk anything.


Israel’s Prime Minister has openly admitted that the Israeli people are the world’s laboratory for this experimental treatment. I am not interested in being a guinea pig or donating my body to science.


Israel agreed to share medical data of its citizens with a foreign drug company as a fundamental part of their agreement to receive this treatment. I never consented for my personal medical data to be shared with any such entity, nor was I even asked. I will not contribute to this sleazy enterprise.


The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. This is a preposterous excuse, and it takes an unbelievable amount of chutzpah to even say such a thing. Such a “line” is a figment of their own imagination; if they hogged a couple of injections for themselves no one would cry foul. In addition, billionaires with private jets and private islands are not known for waiting in line until hundreds of millions of peasants all over the world go first to receive anything these billionaires want for themselves.


The establishment media have accepted this preposterous excuse without question or concern. Moreover, they laud Pfizer’s executives for their supposed self-sacrifice in not taking their own experimental treatment until we go first. Since they consider us such fools, I do not trust them, and do not want their new treatment. They can have my place in line. I’ll go to the very back of the line.


Three facts that must be put together:

  • Bill Gates is touting these vaccines as essential to the survival of the human race.
  • Bill Gates believes the world has too many people and needs to be “depopulated”.
  • Bill Gates, perhaps the richest man in the world, has also not been injected. No rush.

Uh, no. I’ll pass on any medical treatments he wants me to take.


The establishment has been entirely one-sided in celebrating this treatment. The politicians and media are urging people to take it as both a moral and civic duty. The benefits of the treatment are being greatly exaggerated, the risks are being ignored, and the unknowns are being brushed aside. Because they are being deceitful and manipulative, I will not gamble my personal wellbeing on their integrity.


There is an intense propaganda campaign for people to take this treatment. Politicians and celebrities are taking selfies of themselves getting injected (perhaps in some cases pretending to get injected), the media is hyping this as the coolest, smartest, most happy and fun thing to do. It is the most widespread marketing campaign in history. This is not at all appropriate for any medical treatment, let alone a brand new one, and it makes me recoil.


The masses are following in tow, posting pictures of themselves getting injected with a drug, feeding the mass peer pressure to do the same. There is something very alarming and sick about this, and I want no part of it. I never took drugs just because “everyone’s doing it” and it’s cool. I’m certainly not going to start now.


Those who raise concerns about this medical treatment are being bullied, slandered, mocked, censored, ostracized, threatened, and fired from their jobs. This includes medical professionals who have science-based concerns about the drug and caregivers who have witnessed people under their charge suffering horrible reactions and death shortly after being injected. When the establishment is purging good people who risk everything simply to raise concerns about a new medical treatment — even if they don’t outright oppose it — I will trust these brave people over the establishment every time. I cannot think of a single similar case in history when truth and morality turned out to be on the side of the establishment.


This is the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race.


It is purposely not being portrayed as the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race, and the fact that it is a medical experiment at all is being severely downplayed.


Were they up front with the masses, very few would agree to participate in such an experiment. Manipulating the masses to participate in a medical experiment under false pretenses violates the foundations of medical ethics and democratic law. I will not allow unethical people who engage in such conduct to inject me with anything.


The medical establishment is not informing people about any of this. They have become marketing agents for an experimental drug, serving huge companies and politicians who have made deals with them. This is a direct conflict with their mandate to concern themselves exclusively with the wellbeing of the people under their care. Since the medical establishment has become corrupted, and has become nothing more than a corporate and political tool, I do not trust the experimental drug they want so badly to inject me with.


We are being pressured in various ways to get injected, which violates medical ethics and the foundations of democratic society. The best way to get me not to do something is to pressure me to do it.


The government has sealed their protocol related to the virus and treatments for THIRTY YEARS. This is information that the public has a right to know, and the government has a responsibility to share. What are they covering up? Do they really expect me to believe that everything is kosher about all this, and that they are concerned first and foremost with my health? The last time they did this was with the Yemenite Children Affair. If you’re not familiar with it, look it up. Now they’re pulling the same shtick. They didn’t fool me the first time, and they’re definitely not fooling me now.


The government can share our personal medical data with foreign corporations, but they won’t share their own protocol on the matter with us? I’m out.


The establishment has recruited doctors, rabbis, the media, and the masses to harangue people who don’t want to get injected with a new drug. We are being called the worst sort of names. We are being told that we believe in crazy conspiracies, that we are against science, that we are selfish, that we are murderers, that we don’t care about the elderly, that it’s our fault that the government continues to impose draconian restrictions on the public. It’s all because we don’t want to get injected with an experimental treatment, no questions asked. We are even being told that we have a religious obligation to do this, and that we are grave sinners if we do not. They say that if we do not agree to get injected, we should be forced to stay inside our homes forever and be ostracized from public life.

This is horrific, disgusting, a perversion of common sense, morality, and the Torah. It makes me recoil, and only further cements my distrust of these people and my opposition to taking their experimental drug. How dare they?


I know of many people who got injected, but none of them studied the science in depth, carefully weighed the potential benefits against the risks, compared this option to other alternatives, was truly informed, and decided this medical treatment was the best option for them. On the contrary, they got injected because of the hype, the propaganda, the pressure, the fear, blind trust in what “the majority of experts” supposedly believed (assuming THEY all studied everything in depth and were completely objective, which is highly dubious), blind trust in what certain influential rabbis urged them to do (ditto the above), or hysterical fear that the only option was getting injected or getting seriously ill from the virus. When I see mass hysteria and cult-like behavior surrounding a medical treatment, I will be extremely suspicious and avoid it.


The drug companies have a long and glorious history of causing mass carnage with wonder drugs they thrust on unsuspecting populations, even after serious problems had already become known. Instead of pressing the pause button and halting the marketing of these drugs until these issues could be properly investigated, the drug companies did everything in their power to suppress the information and keep pushing their products. When companies and people have demonstrated such gross lack of concern for human life, I will not trust them when they hype a new wonder drug. This isn’t our first rodeo.


Indeed, the horror stories are already coming in at warp speed, but the politicians are not the least bit concerned, the medical establishment is brushing them aside as unrelated or negligible, the media is ignoring it, the drug companies are steaming ahead at full speed, and those who raise a red flag continue to be bullied, censored, and punished. Clearly my life and my wellbeing are not their primary concern. I will not be their next guinea pig in their laboratory. I will not risk being the next “coincidence”.


Although many people have died shortly after getting injected — including perfectly healthy young people — we are not allowed to imply that the injection had anything to do with it. Somehow this is anti-science and will cause more people to die. I believe that denying any possible link, abusing people who speculate that there might be a link, and demonstrating not the slightest curiosity to even explore if there might be a link is what is anti-science and could very well cause more people to die. These same people believe I am obligated to get injected as well. No freaking thanks.


I am repulsed by the religious, cult-like worship of a pharmaceutical product, and will not participate in this ritual.


My “healthcare” provider keeps badgering me to get injected, yet they have provided me no information on this treatment or any possible alternatives. Everything I know I learned from others outside the establishment. Informed consent has become conformed consent. I decline.


I see all the lies, corruption, propaganda, manipulation, censorship, bullying, violation of medical ethics, lack of integrity in the scientific process, suppression of inconvenient adverse reactions, dismissal of legitimate concerns, hysteria, cult-like behavior, ignorance, closed-mindedness, fear, medical and political tyranny, concealment of protocols, lack of true concern for human life, lack of respect for basic human rights and freedoms, perversion of the Torah and common sense, demonization of good people, the greatest medical experiment of all time being conducted by greedy, untrustworthy, godless people, the lack of liability for those who demand I risk everything… I see all this and I have decided they can all have my place in line. I will put my trust in God. I will use the mind He blessed me with and trust my natural instincts. Which leads to the final reason which sums up why I will not get “vaccinated.”


The whole thing stinks.

This originally appeared on Gates of Vienna

Over Half of Military Families do Not Want COVID Vaccines – Employers Cannot Legally Mandate Experimental Shots

February 20, 2021
by Brian Shilhavy

The Vaccine Reaction is reporting that a recent survey found that 53 percent of U.S. military families do not want to take the experimental mRNA COVID injections.

A survey conducted in December 2020 by the Blue Star Families, a non-profit military advocacy organization, found that 53 percent of U.S. military families do not want to get the experimental COVID-19 vaccines being distributed under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) granted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Of the of 53 percent of military families who responded to the survey indicating that they would not get the vaccine, nearly three-quarters cited a distrust of the development process or timeline.

Among deployed troops overseas, most of them are refusing the COVID shots, according to The Vaccine Reaction:

According to the Pentagon, U.S. troops deployed overseas and those charged with critical national security missions are declining to get vaccinated for COVID-19.

Some 320,000 service members and civilian personnel have been vaccinated, leaving a significant amount of the 769,000 doses available to Department of Defense (DoD) unused.

Pentagon officials said as long as the COVID-19 vaccines are classified as EUA by the FDA and not fully licensed, the DoD cannot mandate service members to take the vaccine.

Air Force Brigadier General Paul Friedrichs said that even those personnel responsible for manning America’s nuclear weapons are refusing to get the vaccine.

Employers Cannot Legally Mandate an Experimental Medical Product

While the military acknowledges that they cannot legally require anyone to receive an experimental injection not yet approved by the FDA, some businesses in the U.S. are attempting to do just that.

Last month Health Impact News reported that a nursing home in Wisconsin was firing employees who refused to get an experimental mRNA COVID injection. See:

Wisconsin Nursing Home Believed to be First in U.S. to Fire Staff for Refusing Experimental COVID Injections later reported that the nursing home faced a backlash for their policy, and one employee is now represented by an attorney who has reportedly sent a cease-and-desist letter.

A Rock County-owned nursing home policy that mandates employees get the COVID-19 vaccination or be laid off is “illegal and unenforceable,” according to a cease-and-desist letter filed on behalf of a nursing home employee.

“By implementing its vaccine mandate, your (facility) is attempting to coerce all of its employees into receiving one of the COVID-19 Vaccines,” Elizabeth Brehm, attorney at New York-based Siri Glimstad law firm, wrote on behalf of Amber DeJaynes, a staff member at the Rock Haven skilled nursing facility in Janesville.

The letter, obtained by Wisconsin Spotlight, was sent to Rock Haven Interim Nursing Home Administrator Sara Beran and Rock County Administrator Josh Smith on Tuesday. It informs each that the mandatory vaccination policy is depriving the employees of their statutorily guaranteed rights to decide whether to receive the shot.

“Your company is doing so openly without any regard for the personal medical decisions of the employee,” Brehm wrote. “We hereby demand that you withdraw your COVID-19 vaccine requirement … Failure to do so immediately will result in legal action being filed against you to strike down this illegal requirement. Govern yourselves accordingly.”

The letter lays out why employers cannot make the COVID-19 vaccination compulsory.

The Food and Drug Administration in December granted emergency use authorization for two vaccines — produced by Pfizer and Moderna. They are said to be 95 percent effective in preventing COVID-19, but they are in many ways experimental, unlicensed vaccines. They have not been fully approved by the FDA. Much remains unknown about the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccines, which, by drug approval standards, were developed at lightening speeds.

As the cease-and-desist letter points out, the same law that authorizes emergency use requires the public to have “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

The statutory prohibitions are included in FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance and regulations, according to the legal letter. Dr. Mandy Cohen, executive secretary of the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, has publicly stated under Emergency Use Authorization, “vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory.”

“Sheets for Recipients and Caregivers for both COVID-19 vaccines state on the first page, ‘It is your choice to receive the (COVID-19 Vaccine,” the letter states. (Source.)

If federal law and federal guidelines issued by the CDC and FDA make such mandatory requirements illegal, then why are some employers trying to make the shots mandatory as a requirement for employment?

They are trying to rely on a statement issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) which claims employers have a right to exclude employees from the workplace if they refuse the COVID shots. As reports:

But EEOC guidance asserts that employees who refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccination may be excluded from the workplace.

“Moreover, the EEOC’s Guidance underscores that anti-discrimination laws do not prevent employers from adhering to public health directives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or other federal, state, and local public health agencies,” according to the National Law Review.

There are exceptions. Employees do have protections under civl rights, disability and religious conviction laws. And employers should exhibit extreme caution before firing someone over a compulsory vaccination policy.

“ ..(W)hile the employer may exclude that employee from the workplace, it should avoid terminating the employee or taking additional adverse actions before carefully evaluating whether the employee can work remotely or has protected rights under other employment laws or regulations at the federal, state, and local level,” the National Law Review piece advises.

Wisconsin lawmakers have introduced a bill that would prohibit the kind of mandatory vaccination policies in question at Rock Haven nursing home.

Dr. Meryl Nass, MD, who has been a leader nationally in exposing the massive injuries that occurred within the military during the Gulf War when the non-FDA approved Anthrax vaccine was mandated, also weighed in on this topic via her blog this weekend.

The 2 Covid vaccines currently available in the US are experimental unlicensed products. As such, they cannot be mandated.

The Nuremberg Code and subsequent laws guarantee your right to choose whether to be an experimental subject.  Although it may advantage some entities to have you think otherwise, an experimental product is an experimental product.

These vaccines have not been approved by the FDA, and so they are experimental. And therefore you cannot be forced to accept them.

The vaccines were “authorized” under emergency laws that require limited data.  The Johnson and Johnson vaccine will be coming up for a similar authorization, not a license, this coming week.

Once authorized, it too will be an experimental product. These products are given Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) by FDA, and the clinical trials for each vaccine are ongoing.

You have not seen the federal government, nor any state mandate these vaccines for schoolchildren, healthcare workers or anyone else.  That is because the government knows that legally, they cannot impose mandates and turn all the citizens into guinea pigs: they would almost certainly lose when challenged in the courts.

What the federal government did instead is sneaky.  It hid behind corporate skirts. Its Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a statement that essentially invited corporations to mandate the Covid vaccines, by stating that EEOC had no problem with such a mandate.

I and many others think that employer mandates will be found to be illegal, if challenged. Del Bigtree and his legal affiliate ICAN are assisting employees in fighting such attempted mandates.

I was involved with the only case to test whether a military anthrax vaccine authorized under an EUA could be mandated.  The 2005 case (Doe v Rumsfeld) was heard in First District Court, in DC, by Judge Emmet Sullivan, who is still on the bench.  He ruled that under federal law, an EUA vaccine cannot be mandated.

I am told that the military is being very careful with the Covid vaccines, and soldiers are signing informed consents if they choose to receive the vaccine.  Many are refusing.

Are civilians being given full information about the knowns and unknowns of these vaccines, and signing consent forms? (Source.)

As we have been reporting here on Health Impact News the past several weeks since these experimental injections have started, thousands of people are reportedly being injured and dying due to these injections.

The ones who survive with serious debilitating injuries are not finding any help to cope with those injuries. They cannot sue Pfizer or Moderna because the EUA protects them from any liability, and doctors are totally unprepared (and in many cases probably unwilling) to treat COVID mRNA injuries, so the victims are on their own to try and find help, at their own expense.

Reposted from Health Impact News


February Funnies – Laughter is the Best Medicine

Join us once again for our attempt to lighten our heavy load by trying to find the humor in our situation.

From Spacebusters:

And From our Dear Friend JP:


And for something Musically Beautiful, a bit sad and filled with Satire. From Aliah -Sheffield:

More Humor from Spacebusters:



28-Year-old Wisconsin Healthcare Worker has Aneurysm – Brain Dead Five Days After Second Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injection

REPOST from Health Impact News
February 14, 2021
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The COVID Blog is reporting that 28-year-old Sara Stickles from Beloit, Wisconsin, a healthcare worker at SwedishAmerican Hospital, has suffered a brain aneurysm and is now brain dead just 5 days after receiving the second experimental mRNA COVID injection from Pfizer.

Sadly, this is another instance reported where a young healthcare worker in the prime of their life and with no previous existing health conditions has died after being injected with one of the experimental mRNA COVID injection.

She was an organ donor, so her body is being kept alive until they find suitable recipients for her organs.

She leaves behind a young son, siblings, friends and family members who have expressed shock on Facebook at her sudden death.

Her sister Jamie Lynn Cruz announced on Facebook, February 11, 2021, that the family was saying their goodbyes because there was no hope for her recovery:

It’s true, The Good Die Young. Because my sister was SO incredibly good!

Today My mom, siblings and I were asked to come to the hospital to say our goodbyes to Sara.

Sara had a hemmorage stroke in her brain stem on Sunday Feb 7th, at the young age of 28.

She has been on life support ever since. After all of the tests run, and the MRI results, the Doctors determined that there is no possibility of recovery and eventually her body will shut down.

Because Sara is an organ donor they will continue to keep her body alive until it is time to harvest them. Sara will go on to save countless lives. She continues to give her gifts even after she has gone home to heaven.

My sister is truly an amazing angel. (Source.)

In an earlier Facebook post from February 8th, her sister mentioned that Sara had been sick and “breaking out” from the COVID “vaccine”:

Update: Dr. Called, There going to preform Cerebral angiography tomorrow thru her groin all the way up to her brain to take pictures.

There are not quite sure if it is an aneurysm or avm or a tumor or something else, so they have to do more research of her brain. She is stabilized.

She will react to a pinch, but thats it, eyes are still not open. Subarachnoid hemmorage is what happened. (Bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain, is usually from a bulging blood vessel that bursts in the brain)

The Dr. Is hopeful, he said she’s young, and healthy. I did inform him of her covid vaccine, and that she was sick and breaking out from it. (Source.)

Today, February 14, 2021, Sara’s twin sister, Kara Stickles, shared this post on her Facebook page from someone who reported that mentioning Sara had the Pfizer COVID mRNA injection was being censored and deleted in social media:

This beautiful, healthy 28-year-old mother received an experimental, non-FDA-approved “medical procedure,” and now her family is raising money for her funeral (gofundme link in IG bio and here:

My deepest sympathies to the family.?

Please see @circleofmamas on IG for the entire post. (Edit: “Circle of Mamas” outstanding IG account was deleted; please follow @circleofmamas_ .)

(Social media accounts are getting deleted if they talk about adverse events of certain experimental products. Search for her sister Jamie Lynn Cruz ‘s post, or my Telegram channel has info .)

Question: Are government officials protecting Americans from a (treatable) virus with a nearly 100% survival rate, or is there another reason the powers that be are pushing this “emergency use authorization” product? (Source.)

From the data that the CDC has released so far in the VAERS database, there have been 176 cases in Wisconsin of adverse events, including 26 hospitalizations, 5 permanent disabilities, 58 emergency room visits, and 11 deaths, although none below the age of 44.

So if Sara Stickles’ case has been reported to the CDC VAERS reporting system, the CDC has apparently not released it yet.

As we reported yesterday, the CDC has stated on their website that there have been 1,170 deaths recorded in the U.S. following the experimental mRNA COVID injections, and according to the CDC and the FDA, NONE of them are related to the “COVID vaccines.”


UK Government shocking report on COVID-19 vaccine side effects

The UK Government have released a report highlighting adverse reactions to both the Pfizer and Oxford / Astrazeneca that have occurred since the rollout began on the 8th December and it does not make for pleasant reading.

The report has collated data inputted up to the 24th January 2021 via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. At this point an estimated 5.4 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 1.5 million doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine had been administered, and around 0.5 million second doses, mostly the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, had been administered.

But as predicted, with the rise in vaccines administered came a rise in adverse reactions with 49,472 reported reactions to the Pfizer vaccine and 21,032 reactions to the Oxford / Astrazeneca vaccine. For both vaccines this equates to 1 in every 333 people suffering an adverse reaction. This rate could actually be higher as some cases may have not been reported to the Yellow Card Scheme.

The Daily Expose took a look through the report (which you can find here) and carried out an in depth review of reactions to the Pfizer vaccine and this is what we found –

Thanks to the Pfizer vaccine, which uses MRNA technology to instruct human cells to carry out “a certain task” 5 people are now blind and a further 31 have had their vision impaired. In total there have been 634 eye disorders reported so far. Imagine being confined to the same four walls for over a year and not being able to see family or friends. Then getting excited because you naively think an experimental “vaccine” is going to give you your life back and allow you to see them once more. But then leaving without the ability to ever see anything ever again.

Table taken from the Government Report

There have also been 21 cerebrovascular accidents thanks to the experimental Pfizer vaccine. A cerebrovascular accident is the sudden death of some brain cells due to lack of oxygen when the blood flow to the brain is impaired by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain. A cerebrovascular accident is also referred to as a stroke.

We told you on the 4th December how the UK Government admitted it did not know if the Pfizer vaccine had an impact on fertility, which must have really convinced any aspiring wannabe parents to have the vaccine. But that admission also included comments on pregnancy which were as follows –


There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
 For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.

So why on earth have we found within the Pfizer vaccine analysis print a total of 4 spontaneous abortions due to receiving a dose of the Pfizer vaccine? The government’s own recommendation is that anyone who is pregnant or wants to get pregnant within the next two months should avoid the Pfizer vaccine, so why are pregnant woman receiving this vaccine? You won’t hear about this in the mainstream media.

Sadly there have also been 2 reports of spontaneous abortion after administration of the Oxford / Astrazeneca vaccine.

Then we stumbled on an even more shocking statistic. The Yellow Card Scheme has received 59 reports of death and 7 reports of sudden death due to the Pfizer vaccine. That’s 7 people just dropping dead immediately after receiving the “jab” as Mr Hancock loves to call it.

But the overall number of “Fatal Outcome” reports, aka “Deaths” due to the Pfizer vaccine as of the 24th January is 107. So that’s 5 people who are now blind, 21 who have suffered a stroke, 4 who have suffered a miscarriage even after the government advising, all be it in the small print, that pregnant women avoid the “jab”, and 107 who have sadly passed away, all as a result of receiving an experimental, emergency approved vaccine of which the manufacturers have absolutely zero liability in being held to account or compensating any adverse reactions.

We can also tell you that up to the 24 January 2021 the Yellow Card Scheme received 69 reports of Bells Palsy due to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. Bell’s palsy is a condition that causes weakness or paralysis of the muscles in one side of the face. It is the most common cause of facial paralysis.

The Government have of course tried to explain away all these terrible side effects of the Covid vaccines. Within the report they stated the following –

A high proportion of people vaccinated in the vaccination campaign so far are very elderly, many of whom will also have pre-existing medical conditions. Older age and chronic underlying illnesses make it more likely that coincidental adverse events will occur, especially given the millions of people vaccinated. It is therefore important that we carefully review these reports to distinguish possible side effects from illness that would have occurred irrespective of vaccination.

And that, readers, is the definition of being a ‘Hypocrite’. Tens of thousands of people have died with underlying conditions within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, yet their death has been labelled as “Definitely Covid” and has been added to the Covid death statistics (Don’t believe us? See our in depth analysis of ONS and NHS data here). But of course we’re only allowed to use this method of counting deaths when it comes to Covid. Because when it comes to the vaccine we are being told that they probably died from their “Underlying Conditions” and should take any reports of death with a “pinch of salt”.

The problem with this being the method for calculating the former has resulted in the British people living under dictatorial tyranny for almost a year.

These are just the immediate side effects of the Covid vaccines, and only the ones that have been reported. We dread to think what adverse effects we might see in the long term.

Will you be having the “jab”?


Kristen Meghan reveals the BIG MASK LIE – Mike Adams

Health Ranger Mike Adams interviews Kristen Meghan who is a senior industrial hygienist. As a senior industrial hygienist she is an expert and specialist in environmental and occupational toxicology with experience in heavy metal exposure, contact poison exposure, respiratory inhalant exposure, microbiological virology expertise as well as radiation and laser safety. Her career spans so many different realms including public health.

Mask Craziness

Kristen’s states, “In my career field, whether I am embedded in a place of employment or a contractor or a consultant, prior to COVID, if I ever put a general populace or average lay person in respiratory protection without following OSHA law I literally could be put in jail. I would definitely be fined and fired. I could not conceive that what has happened could be a thing and happen in the United States.”

Kristen continues, “We are getting information from people who flip flop. If they had any other kind of employment, for instance, Dr. Fauci is the highest paid official in government from what I hear. If he was a contract in a hospital he would be gone. You cannot flip flop like this because you are not only harming human health, it’s a huge financial impact. When you give the wrong recommendations when it comes to PPE it has major adverse reactions. Like Fauci said, it has unintended consequences.”

Kristen: “How in the world are we reciting opinion pieces that have no bases in law and RTC studies. How in the world are we citing opinion pieces instead of laws and standards that have existed on the books since 1979?”

What has happened to good, sound science?

Mike Adams asked: ” How has this affected your belief in the rigorous nature of science or science minded thinking?”

Kristen: “I am almost 39. It has made me kind of wonder what else has happened before my time where the health and governmental organizations have said one thing and then completely negated everything they knew and said another and then went back and forth It scares the living hell out of me. It has the general populace believing everything a doctor says. If you are a doctor or a white coat everything you say is believed even if it is out of the scope of your expertise. And that is really scary.

Mike and Kristen talk about how scientific studies have been manipulated, citing the study on Hydroxychloroquine by the Lancet that had to be retracted.

Kristen: “A huge aspect of my career has been managing OSHA’s respiratory protection program for over 76,000 people.”

Health Impacts

The problem with the masks is not that it will lay you out in thirty minutes but it is the prolonged constant deprivation of oxygen on a regular basis. We have been in these masks for over 8 months. Over time that constant deprivation can impact brain development in children, renal function. I have to know all the hazards associated with prolonged mask wearing.”

Kristen explains that there have been standards in the workplace on who can wear respirators. Everyone must be cleared to wear a respirator. If you have a history of asthma, bronchitis, cancer, stroke, claustrophobia, PTSD, even seasonal allergies. These are flags. A doctor has to approve the use of a respirator and people get denied all the time.

“It is insane to me that so many people, especially physicians will come out and say that there are no reasons why people should not wear a mask unless they have a neurological disorder and can’t put it on themselves. That is not how it works at all.”

“What we are doing now, well, a year ago, it was completely illegal.”

“It is not just about an issue of constitutional rights, there are legit reasons why for 40 years you had to have a medical clearance to wear an N-95 mask in the workplace.”

Watch the video for more information on the Elite depopulation agenda; how gradual oxygen deprivation from mask wearing can be a slow kill method; Kristen’s military experience; people must start to take responsibility for their personal health, and more.

For the full video interview click on the link below:

Searching for Information to Fact Check and Validate

Because of the censorship that is happening on the internet finding information to validate alternative views is not always easy. Kristen has advice.

Kristen: “I implore people to understand that there are professions you have never heard of but that does not mean they do not exist. Just because you may not be able to find something that aligns with what I am telling you on the internet does not mean what I am telling you is not correct. Search for OSHA law 29-CFR1910.134. Medical Questionaire is Appendix C in the OSHA materials. You need to use alternate search engines like Duck Duck Go because information is being suppressed. When you find this information you will be wondering why in the world is this being suppressed.”

On the topic of who is qualified to give correct information on the use of masks: “Again, just because someone is a doctor does not mean they are the Jack of All Trades, just because I am Industrial Hygienist does not mean I speak out of my profession either.”

Italy: Masks Forbidden at School, Judgement of the Council of State

Repost from the website:
The Liberty Beacon and Europe Reloaded
February 8, 2021

ER Editor: Most of us reading a site like this are very much aware of the various physical risks of mask-wearing. Remember the fireman showing us how a variety of masks deprive us of the legally required level of oxygen? See FIREMAN PROVES WEARING MASKS DEPRIVE YOU FROM A VITAL OXYGEN LEVEL. See also German Neurologist Warns Against Wearing Facemasks: ‘Oxygen Deprivation Causes Permanent Neurological Damage’.

The short piece below from French independent media reports on the importance of the SECOND key decision made recently by the Italian Council of State, this time on children being forced to wear masks in schools (the first concerned the prohibition on hydroxychloroquine).

This is a decision to watch.

Italy: masks forbidden at school, judge of the Council of State


Is this a domino effect to come? President Frattini of Section III of the Italian Council of State issued a decision condemning the use of masks at school among minors.

In his judgment he considers :

1) that the defendant administration has not yet filed in the file, before the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio, the documents that the first judge had ordered to be produced within the period of 15 days, which has now largely elapsed.
2) that these documents, which confirm the need for the timely filing of documents, are relevant to the decisive profiles in the litigation in question;
3) that, in the case brought to the attention of this judge, the minor represented by his parents repeatedly documented, by means of medical certificates, problems of lack of oxygenation due to the prolonged use of masks during all school hours;
4) that in the class attended by the minor, there is not even a device for monitoring oxygenation – an oximeter, an instrument of minimal cost and very simple usability allowing each teacher to intervene at the very first sign of difficulty in breathing in very young students;

Therefore, the judge held that :

“The minor cannot be forced to use a mask during class because of the risk of respiratory fatigue.
“Due to the serious and immediate nature of this decision, the provisional execution of this decision was requested in order to protect the young student and to allow him to attend classes.”

An important decision that will certainly be watched by French lawyers who have already referred this issue to the French Council of State.

Me Manna (ER: lawyer) analyzes it thus:

“this is the second decision of the Italian Council of State which, after having lifted the objection on the prescription of hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 by doctors, calls into question the obligation to wear a mask for 6-10 year olds on the grounds that the side effects have not been sufficiently evaluated and that its effectiveness has not been proven”. “We will not fail to assert this element of comparative law in the case of our current procedures”.



Published to The Liberty Beacon from