Powerful interview with trial lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich, who says they have the evidence to sue governments, health organizations, and the WHO.
Powerful interview with trial lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich, who says they have the evidence to sue governments, health organizations, and the WHO.
|(Natural News) Vaccinated individuals accounted for three-quarters of Singapore’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in the last four weeks, putting a dent in the country’s vaccination program. Singapore, which has been distributing the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, has already vaccinated nearly 75 percent of its 5.7 million people – the world’s second-highest rate behind the United…|
The miners have been busy uncovering historical nuggets on the YMCA and Salvation Army. These findings will make their way into a more cohesive article, but for now we wanted to make sure our intelligence network had access to the documents we found.
We have already provided the AIM truth community with breaking research about these human trafficking networks:
W.T. Stead (with Lord Rothschild, J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt and Andrew Carnegie bankrolls) co-opted The Salvation Army (and the Y.M.C.A. & Y.W.C.A.) into his global ‘One World Order’ schema
In no particular order, here is additional information:
Here we find W.T. Stead…. again:
“W. T. Stead of the Pall Mall Gazette launched a campaign in 1885 by writing articles on The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon to expose the extent of child prostitution which involved procuring a girl, Eliza for £5. She was cared for by the Army, taken to France and subsequently testified as a key witness at the trial of Stead and Rebecca Jarrett (the prostitute who had arranged the “sale” of Eliza) at Bow Street. Both were sentenced to 6 months in prison. “
Curious aggregation of activities around William Booth College, London (founder of the Salvation Army)
William Booth College, Champion Park, London SE5 8BQ, United Kingdom
1868 (just two years after J.P. Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and Elihu Root incorporated the New York YMCA)– the year William Booth’s emerging Salvation Army was coopted by “ten prominent philanthropists to assist him”
(NOTE: That is not the way Christian missions get started and grow. Normally, it takes many years if not decades to build a board of trustees/directors who share one’s vision for a work.” One does not normally have the funds to immediately start publishing one’s own magazine. This story is fake.)
W.T. Stead’s influence “Christian socialism” in the Salvation Army
According to Norman H. Murdoch, “by 1886 the Salvation Army’s growth had come to a halt in England — much as the Christian Mission’s growth had ceased in East London by 1874” (113) — mostly because William Booth primarily preached the need for salvation, i.e. redemption from sin and its effects, but overlooked social work among the poor and destitute.
In the mid 1880s, the Salvation Army developed new strategies which aimed to deal with the poverty and squalor of urban slums. Street preaching, home meetings, prayer groups and Bible study were supplemented by social action. Francis S. Smith, who was for some time a Salvation Army commissioner in the United States, and William Thomas Stead, one of the most distinguished Victorian journalists and a dedicated supporter of the Salvation Army (later a Titanic victim), contributed to the rise of the Social Wing of the Salvation Army. They argued convincingly that the Army should not concentrate on pure evangelism only, but must be involved more actively in social work in order to win converts from the lower classes. William Booth quickly understood these arguments and he endorsed the new strategy which was to involve the Salvation Army in Christian social reform.
Smith and Stead helped Booth to write In Darkest England and the Way Out (1890), an important manifesto, which proposed social and welfare schemes aimed to eradicate poverty, squalor and unemployment in congested urban areas through organised labour exchanges, food distribution networks, co-operative workshops and farms, and emigration of surplus labour to the British colonies.
The Salvation Army magazine, All the World from 1893, reported that in the period from November 1, 1892, to October 1st, 1893, the Social Wing of the Salvation Army provided 3,886,896 meals, 1,094,078 men were sheltered, 1,987 passed through Elevators (work establishments), 267 were provided with situation, 159 passed to Farm Colony and 180 men from Prison-Gate Home were sent to situations (477). Besides, the Salvation Army promoted job creation schemes by encouraging local authorities to employ unemployed people in roadwork and tree-planting on public roads.
In 1893, the Army also expressed ‘great interest’ in the formation of a Government Labour Department, which would gather statistics and information about vacant jobs. By 1900, the Salvation Army had opened its own labour exchange in London to help poor people find jobs. However, it was not until 1909 that Parliament passed a law which provided for the establishment of nationalised labour exchanges. The social ministry of the Salvation Army became one of its most valuable assets in the last decade of Victorian Britain.
Pilgrims Society and then Lord Privy Seal, was finessing the government’s response to feign concern, while doing nothing to stop the child trafficking practice [that was also occurring via the British global deployments of the Salvation Army and YMCA.])
In 1922 Hong Kong, there were 200,000 Chinese and 6,000 Europeans. “[E]ach Chinese house in the Colony had one or more girls virtually in a position of slavery.” If each family has four souls, that means that 50,000 or more were in slavery, by the British Parliament’s own testimony.
H.L. Haslewood, Lieut-Commander, Royal Navy (ret.). (May 11, 1921). CHILD SLAVERY UNDER BRITISH RULE. Hong Kong Daily News, London Daily News.
Thomas Inskip, Austen Chamberlain.* (May 29, 1922). HONG KONG (LIEUT.-COMMANDER HASLEWOOD), Colonial Office, HC Deb 29 May 1922 vol 154 cc1678-80. UK Parliament, Hansard.
* Pilgrims Society
Thomas Inskip, Austen Chamberlain* et al. (May 24, 1922). Hong Kong (Lieut-Commander Haslewood), HC Deb 24 May 1922 vol 154. UK Parliament Hansard.
CHILD SLAVERY UNDER BRITISH RULE.
By H. L. HASLEWOOD,
Lieut -Commander R.N. (retired).
It is high time that the British public were fully informed of the abominable system of child-slavery which prevails in the Crown Colony of Hong Kong.
For nearly a hundred years this island, with its 200,000 Chinese inhabitants, has been under our rule. There ere now some 6,000 Europeans, and the. island is controlled by the [British] Governor and a Legislative ‘Council. When I was acting as Superintendent of the Admiralty Chart Depot there in 1919 my wife and I were horrified by the screams of a child which came during the evening from a Chinese house.
As a result of our efforts to make inquiries we came to the conclusion that this ! must be one of those cases of slavery which we had heard darkly hinted at. When I reported the case to the police I was told that it was “probably a slave girl.” My wife immediately begun investigations, and these revealed to us the fact, which had indeed already been discussed in a sermon by the British chaplain, that each Chinese house in the Colony had one or more girls virtually in a position of slavery. The custom is called adoption, but money payments are usually made, and in the majority of cases the girls became household drudges and worse. As the result of our action I relinquished my appointment, and step by step have forced the Colonial Office to admit the material fact in this I grave indictment ot British honour.
A reply recently given by tbe Colonial Office to questions regarding the buying and selling of children in Hong Kong was as follows:
Buying and selling of human beings does not take place openly in Hung Kong. A custom does exist there, us elsewhere in China, by which, in return for a money payment, girls are transferred by their parents or natural guardians to the care of another household, usually for the purpose of domestic service, though the transaction is described by the Chinese as a form of adoption.
Outside official circles it is hard to believe that anyone can distinguish the difference between the transfer of a girl for a money payment and actual buying and selling.
Sheltering under this custom, the most revolting abuses in the traffic of girls and children are openly carried out. Go-betweens or brokers are employed for the sale and purchase of these unfortunate girls, and the fact that large numbers are sold into the local houses of ill-fame, and are shipped overseas for the same purpose, is perfectly well known to the whole shipping community .
Sold “in Marriage.”
The “Hong Kong Weekly Press” of March 13, 1921, writes as follows:
We have heard one of the leading Chinese residents of Hong Kong express the opinion that fully 90 per cent, of the children bought in the Colony are bought really as a commercial speculation.
They ‘are purchased at a very tender age for a few dollars, “trained to domestic service” for a few years, and sold in marriage perhaps for many times the original purchase price.
In circumstances like these it will instantly be recognised [stet] that the system is open to mat abuse, especially . in the case of children who fail develop personal attractions which enhance their marketable value.
An astounding feature of the case is that the above practice has been definitely announced as illegal in China itself, and that the Colonial Office are fully aware of this fact, but iu spite of this no steps are taken to abolish the practice in Hong Kong.
Burns and Bruises.
Revolting cases of brutal ill-treatment were brought before the Hong Kong magistracy on Jul 15 and August 3 of last year, when two girls were taken to the hospital covered with burns and bruises from head to foot as a result of the treatment they had received from their purchasers. On January 24 and on Jn 25 of this year, and also on Feb. 7, three small girl children were taken to hospital in the same condition[.] One of them while sick (as her mistress admitted) had been beaten and kicked about, and bore the marks of a rattan cane. To qupte the exact words, “she was literally covered with bruises caused by some blunt rough instrument.”
The following case shows that the buying and selling is by no means confined to the adoption and domestic service, as the Colonial Office would have us believe:
On December the 8th, 1920, a Chinese woman was charged with obtaining by false pretenses the sum of thirty dollars . The evidence showed that she arranged for the sale of her sister as a concubine.
As is usual in these cases, incredible as it may seem, no exception was taken to the buying and selling, but only to the question of false pretences [sic], the woman having represented her sister as being unmarried.
A case came before the courts recently in which tine children aged 11 and 13 were found to be carrying weights of 60lb. up the steep hill of the Peak, Hong Kong.
Arising from this case quests in the House of Commons elicited the fact that there are no regulations in HONG Kong controlling the amount of work which a child may be called upon to do, nor any limit of hours for which a child may be called upon to work; and, further, that a resolution carried unanimously at a meeting of the Sanitary board in Hong Kong in May, 1919, calling for by-laws prohibiting the employment of children under the age of 14 in factories or workshops for more than 10 hours in any one day was rejected.
It is intolerable that such a state of slavery should exist in a British colony, where a British Governor rules practically without check, and it would appear that nothing but public opinion is likely to effect any real or lasting reform.
W.T. Stead propaganda in the promotion of the William Booth book that he ghost wrote.
W.T. Stead, ed. (Oct. 01, 1890). In Darkest England and the Way Out by William Booth, Book of the Month, Vol. II, No. 10, Sec. IX (09), pp. 382-397, 492-507. The Review of Reviews.
William Booth (b. 1829, d.1912). (Nov. 01, 1890). (POSTER) In Darkest England and the Way Out, supplement to The Review of Reviews, Nov. 1890, W.T. Stead publisher and co-author with Booth. Review of Reviews.
(Note: Thomas Carlyle was a proponent of slavery and indentured servitude in the British Empire)
Stead is positioning a certain ruthlessness in Booth. Real Christian leaders do not view those who work with them as obedient soldiers, but rather associates, brothers and sisters in Christ. The Biblical soldier metaphors deal with personal character and discipline, not an organizational manifesto. This story seems fabricated. And, Stead scolded Booth about the two ladies after only his first contact, threatening him with manslaughter. This appears to be pure storytelling fiction.
But, it does give the impression that Booth is in charge of his troops.
Evident Stead lionization of Booth and the family:
Stead links the Booths and Salvation Army to the British aristocratic model, no doubt to convince the self-anointed elitists in the Society of the Elect to bring them into the fold.
Lionizing the whole Booth family.
Lionizing the entire operation with superlatives and flattery. Stead is a propaganda genius (the publishing world does call him the “Father of Tabloid Journalism.”
Stead reinforced the WAR metaphor. Stead’s compadres Lord Milner, Cecil Rhodes, Lord Rosebery, Lord Rothschild were preparing for two Boer Wars in South Africa, then WWI
The origin of the name, Salvation Army, is likely fabrication. Propaganda always contains juicy little detail vignettes to boost believability.
“After long and careful study of the manuals of the British Army.” Yeh, right Mr. Stead. Cute. How do you know it was long and careful study? You were not there. And, you did not cite a source for that information, which is, at best, heresay.
Stead distances Booth in his war from other Churches and Christians which he labels lukewarm en masse. His use of “constant” in this next piece is the tell that this is pure propagandistic rhetoric, devoid of fact. Were some churches, even many, lukewarm? Maybe, but Stead cleverly isolate Booth from the entire body of Christian churches (… and drives Booth politically to the Society of the Elect).
Here is Stead’s clever creation of a new social gospel agenda for the Salvation Army.
Stead articulates the Society of the Elects’ plans to control humanity. Note that this vision requires cheap white slave labor which Stead plans to use the unwashed masses to provide. (i.e., Co-operative Settlement (John Ruskin)(precursors to the Kibbutz, communism), Universal Emigration, The Salvation (slave) ship. Remember, these Stead Society of the Elect loyalists trained Lenin and Stalin in Bolshevism in London 1902-1914.
Stead even commissioned an exquisitely designed poster for this vision (another tell that Stead wrote the propaganda, not Booth).
Stead’s flattery, again.
Another tell that Stead has arranged all the money that Booth needs from the Society of the Elect (Barclays, Rothschilds, Rosebery, Lord Pirbright, etc.)
The reference to “a much more highly-specialized intelligence” is haunting. For a Christian ministry that believes in being led by the Holy Spirit? Note, the members of the subsequent Pilgrims Society in 1902 organized the First Imperial Press Conference in 1909, after which prime minister Asquith (Carrie Johnson’s illegitimate great grandfather) organize MI6, MI5, GC&CS and the Empire Press Union out of the delegates to the Press Conference.” To what extent was the Salvation Army, YMCA and YWCA already supplying such information? To a great extent it appears.
Stead tell: Since the public has not read the new book, these could not possibly be the questions? In Stead’s mind, the Salvation Army HAS ALREADY TURNED HIS WAY. Therefore, he is asking the follow on questions and dispensing with them here.
Stead perhaps alludes to his co-authorship as the serpent, teaming with the saint (“which is very marvelous to behold”).
In the 1890s, Stead became increasingly interested in spiritualism. In 1893, he founded a spiritualist quarterly, Borderland, in which he gave full play to his interest in psychical research. Stead was editor, and he employed Ada Goodrich Freer as assistant editor; she was also a substantial contributor under the pseudonym “Miss X”. Stead claimed that he was in the habit of communicating with Freer by telepathy and automatic writing. The magazine ceased publication in 1897.[35Freer by telepathy and automatic writing. The magazine ceased publication in 1897.
Stead is cleverly anticipating the push back
More Stead lionization of Booth. Stead is also telling people that Booth takes his orders from Stead.
Stead speaks of himself as the “shifty mariner”
Steads propagandizing of the larger-than-life Booth persona
Stead is telling us his Society of the Elect associations that are driving this “social” agenda. Lord Rosebery had just inherited the N.M. Rotshchild banking fortune. He was a member of Rhodes’ Society of the Elect, was Foreign Secretary at that time, would become Lord President of the Privy Council in 1894, then prime minister in 1895
Stead’s scientism shows through here. This is not the way Booth would write. “Triumphs of Science.”
BLM: “Science is Real…”
Communism? Certainly authoritarianism.
Slave labor in the Farm Colony
Klaus Schwab: “You’ll own nothing and be happy.”
Cult compounds planned. (Sounds like a kibbutz.). The Settlement Movement under John Ruskin started experimenting with these forms of communism starting during the 1880s decade.
Doubtless, Stead and not Booth wrote this every word:
Remarkably, L. Bolton Bangs medical biographies fail to mention where he received his experience in genital urology: the New York Y.M.C.A.
Lemuel Bolton Banks (1842-1914). (Accessed Jul. 09, 2021). Biography. Wikisource.
Lemuel Bolton Bangs, M.D., editor. (1900). Atlas of syphilis and the venereal diseases : including a brief treatise on the pathology and treatment. W.B. Saunders (London).
YMCA, England. (Jun. 06, 1844). YMCA First Annual Report. YMCA Great Britain, Springfield College.
It is amazing how quickly these young men got organized and started formally printing the meeting minutes!
All too perfect.
This story is about happytalism. Due to the vast amount of information, this is part one of the series. “Happytalism” is a very tricky word that hasn’t gotten much attention yet — but we may start hearing about it shortly.
It’s a branding term that sweetly refers to the same transhumanist framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset (where real estate ownership is concentrated, where living beings are reduced to “digital twins” managed through the blockchain, and where we “own nothing” and eat bugs).
“Happytalism” is a piece of marketing language that lives together with “green and sustainable development,” “racial equity,” “inclusivity,” “climate justice,” “building back better,” and so on. Speaking of bugs, I can’t resist.
For context, please keep in mind that in 2019, the United Nations signed a broad and unpublicized agreement with the World Economic Forum on strategic cooperation on a number of issues, and 4IR is listed as one of the areas of said cooperation. On a tangent, I would also like to point out a detail that is easy to miss.
Where the agreement talks about health, it mentions cooperation on antimicrobial resistance. It so happens that according to the World Economic Forum, they expect antimicrobial resistance to become a major threat that will greatly exceed the dangers of the coronavirus.
It is also notable that the entire western health response to the coronavirus has strongly pushed for measures that reduce natural immunity, discourage the use of vitamins, and promote overuse of sanitizers, which is thought to lead to antimicrobial resistance (you can check the thread below).
Before we get to happytalism proper, please take a look at this mind-boggling United Nation article and video. For starters, here’s this bit where indigenous children sing about, I am sorry, the “new world order.” This song is also a part of the official United Nations video below. (The comments on the video are disabled.)
[While you are at it, please check out the sweet, sincere message by the well-known altruist and environmentalist, Prince Charles, who does not at all own any framework for a new economic system (at around 2:24). And if you have the heart for it, check out the WTF skit on potty training for the unwashed heathen (at 39:41).]
Notably, the story and the video were originally posted on the subdomain of the United Nations website that has to do with the SDGs (“sustainable development goals”), a program that is ears-deep in the World Economic Forum’s agenda toward the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset).
Okay, so the children sang a strange song about the coronavirus and the “new world order,” the latter known of course to be a funny phrase, whispered by crazy people as they go about “the elites” and adjust the tinfoil hats on their heads. I personally don’t use this phrase because you can’t get very far with it, even though … oh never mind.
But my good manners do not change the fact that the phrase was coined and popularized not by crazy tinfoil hat wearers but by some of the most influential people of the western world (the proverbial “elites”), such as, for example, Henry Kissinger, and that’s just in the recent era.
A bit of a philosophical thought process: Are there elites? Are we all on the same level when it comes to being able to control national and global cashflows, wars, the media and the politicians? How insane is it to presume that those in power might have selfish ideas about the world, and what it should be, and where it should go?
Is it insane to posit that in their heads, they might not relate to the rest of us as much as we would like, and might possess less respect for our opinions and interests than we may hope? Is it insane to speculate that powerful people might be talking to each other privately to promote their shared interests (while also competing with each other on their level)?
Has it never happened? Never-ever? Not even an oil war? Not even a crusade or a secret treaty? Not even an American corporation profiting from the Nazi concentration camps? Not even an alphabet agency protecting Nazi researchers and secretly shipping them to the U.S. to continue unethical experiments? Not even a drug manufacturer doing experiments on disadvantaged children in New York?
Is it insane to think that the special interests of today’s, um, elites, seemingly include converging biological life and digital artifacts (and I don’t care if this is their own insane idea or an insane idea suggested by their highly paid advisors — but the notion of it is officially official and featured on government websites in Canada and in the UK — while still undeniably insane.)
And is it crazy to think that someone out there seems very interested in establishing a, hopefully, all-planetary system of control and management of every living thing and every mineral on Earth, a system controlled by a few hundred or thousand particularly ambitious and wealthy individuals, and managed by AI?
Aren’t they themselves promoting this idea through the media and NGOs? Here is also very lavishly funded — and allegedly very miserable in real life — Ray Kurzweil — and his crazy singularity.
And what structures are there in place to ensure that modern western citizens are immune from being eventually — or soon — treated by the super wealthy the way the indigenous were treated by various European missionaries and their royal masters?
What if digital colonialism is really a thing in the heads of the “elites,” just like traditional colonialism was a thing that drove the rulers of the past? On a side note, please google the 1974 Kissinger report that, among other things, brags about incentivizing Indian men to get a vasectomy).
That’s that about tinfoil hats. Life is complex and multi-faceted but people do conspire, and they do it all the time, so the notion that they could be conspiring today is not that crazy. Also, please see the SoftBank founder talking about his 300-year plan.
Speaking of “long-range plans made in secret,” here is a wonderful article by Steven Newcomb, titled, “On Conspiracy.” (I owe the “long-range plans made in secret” phrase to him as well.)
Steven looks at it from an indigenous perspective. It turns out that back in the day, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “Our settlements will gradually circumscribe and approach the Indians, and they will in time either incorporate with us as citizens of the United States, or remove beyond the Mississippi. The former is certainly the termination of their history most happy for themselves.”
And now, please meet actual “happytalism,” Jayme Illien, and “Happiness for All,” an initiative that claims the participation of the United Nations and aims to install literally a “New World Order” based on “happiness.”
Before I say anything else, I want to first say that Jayme Illien seems like a very opportunistic man with deep ties to the alphabets and a possible a broken childhood, and that his direct association with the UN in the context of that specific project is officially disputed.
The United Nations has officially denied their relationship to his project, while at the same time promoting similar initiatives. That said, opportunistic folks play a significant role in human history, and he seems to be hustling really hard while having powerful connections. Here is an archived version of the now deleted Wikipedia article about him.
Here is an archived version of a Business Insider story about Illien that has since been deleted. It gives a lot of insight into his line of work. It talks about him being a United Nations representative for Economists for Peace and Security, and also about this:
“In 2011, Illien Global Public Benefit Corporation launched a multi-year campaign to move happiness to the top of the international policy agenda forever. In 2012, Illien Global approached the United Nations about creating the new global day, the International Day of Happiness, now celebrated worldwide every March 20.
With the support and leadership of ambassadors from all over the world – including the Kingdom of Bhutan, which measures Gross National Happiness instead of GDP – Illien Global was able to gain the endorsement of the President of the General Assembly and United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to bring a new UN resolution to the General Assembly that would create the new global day, the International Day of Happiness.” (source)
When it comes to Jayme Illien, he has A LOT of websites, some are well-developed and presentable, some are completely raw and full of placeholder images and text, and some keep interestingly changing over time. In fact, in one of his interviews, Jayme Illien has changed his name as well. His Facebook has not been updated since 2018.
If you look at illienglobal.com, it’s all digital ecosystems, smart cities, and blockchain, all the favorite things of the 4IR dreamers, wrapped in “green and sustainable” language for the busy and the gullible.
In his own words, “For 35 years, Illien Global™ has been dedicated to working with governments, intergovernmental organizations, global financial institutions, the technology sector, global leaders, academia, civil society, and the broader private sector to advance the human condition, invest in the future, and promote Happiness for All™.” (source).
Also in own words, “In 2011, Illien Global launched the Happiness for All™ Initiative at the United Nations, leading Secretary-General Ban-Ki Moon to call for a new economic paradigm based on ‘Gross Global Happiness.’”
(Gross Global Happiness is its own thing. It looks like in part, the people promoting it really believe that they are doing something good; however, it was also true of various missionaries of the past who created suffering in the name of their ideology.)
Illien’s “United Nations New World Order” website has been scrubbed. But the archived version says, “The United Nations New World Order Project is a global, high-level initiative founded in 2008 to advance a new economic paradigm, a new political order, and more broadly, a new world order for humankind, which achieves the UN’s Global Goals for Sustainable Development by 2030, and the happiness, well-being, and freedom of all life on Earth by 2050.”
The United Nations has denied their affiliation with this website. The webpage where they said it seems to be gone, but here is the archived version.
“And just to note that over the weekend, I’ve been receiving a lot of questions from different journalists about a website for a something called the United Nations New World Order project. I just want to state and say this very clearly that this project and website is in no way sanctioned by the United Nations.” (from the May 27, 2020 daily briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesman for the Secretary-General).
And then, there is Luis Gallardo who also claims to be a founder of Happytalism. Gallardo’s web presence is far more polished than Illien’s. In his own words, he is the Founder & President of the World Happiness Foundation and World Happiness Fest (the original link is not available), the author of “Happytalism and The Exponentials of Happiness,” and the Director of the Gross Global Happiness program at the United Nations University for Peace.
He is also associated with the World Happiness Academy. All the projects are very fuzzy and look like there is good money behind them. Here is a video of both of them talking about Happytalism. To make it more interesting, in this online meeting, Jayme Illien goes by “Jayme Lilienthal.”
And finally, remember the notorious World Economic Forum’s proposition that went, “You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy”?
Well, well, well … here is another guy who wrote a book called, “Happytalism,” and guess what, buried among various sweet words, there’s de-prioritizing income as a value, which seems to me like a very nice and elusive way to say that after all, “you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy.”
Add to that the trend toward very lucrative impact investment programs for “mental health,” and also money arbitrarily generated by the government (because they can) and then given to private entities to “solve problems,” and we have a robust feudal economy where the majority own nothing and play the role of unhappy bodies need to be made happy through government-funded impact investment programs, implemented by private companies.
Nice, right? (By the way, here’s from Happytalism.world in 2018, “Taking on Mental Illness Is Fiscally Sound and Morally Necessary”).
And yes, the author of the book could be a mere opportunist who chose to write a trendy book, much like the opportunists in the Soviet Union pontificated ad nauseam about non-existent communist ideals. But … I don’t know … am I being silly not trusting these people with my happiness?
There’s lots more to say about the act of hijacking “good” language to sell whatever one wants to sell, but the article is getting too long. So I would like to end this story with the interview with Mary Otto-Chang, in case you missed it earlier. She is wonderful.
To find more of Tessa Lena’s work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.
Banned on Facebook – Please Distribute
By Anna Von Reitz