Banned on Facebook – Please Distribute
By Anna Von Reitz
Banned on Facebook – Please Distribute
By Anna Von Reitz
By Anna Von Reitz
By Anna Von Reitz
By Anna Von Reitz
The news that Real Estate Agents and FBI Agents and IRS Agents and Bar Attorneys and Medical Doctors and Registered Nurses and many other “licensed professionals” are working for the Queen and that as Federal Employees and/or Territorial State-of-State franchise employees they are subject to registration under the Foreign Agents Registration Act—- even if they are as American as apple pie —has created a shock wave.
Many people are waking up and looking around and thinking—-perhaps for the first time— why do I have to have a Bar Card (like a Union Card) to practice law? Why do I need a license to sell land and houses?
It’s because you are participating in a foreign guild system and working as the agents of a foreign government.
Americans have never had such restrictions. Our Government does not license occupations of common right. We don’t do things this way, and the only reason that you are being coerced and manipulated (and taxed and harassed) is because foreign subcontractors have been substituting themselves for your lawful American Government ever since the Civil War.
So, what to do? How can you help? Where does this leave you, if you are dependent on a license to make a living?
You can still come home to the land and soil jurisdiction and reclaim your birthright political status as an American.
You can still be a loyal member of your State Assembly and you can help us finish the Reconstruction, declare the peace, and take back your country and restore your American Government.
Just like anyone else.
The one thing you can’t do—until you retire or otherwise leave your licensed profession— is serve as a State Citizen.
Our State Governments require our State Citizens to have a singular loyalty and attachment to their State Government, so that they have no conflicts of interest when they vote on international issues on behalf of their State.
So you can’t be a State Citizen while acting as a licensed Foreign Agent, but you can still act as a State National.
What if you are in shock to learn that your political status has been changed to a foreign status as a result of your job? What if you don’t want to work for the Queen? What if it rubs you the wrong way to take part in these foreign systems and act in a foreign capacity?
In most, if not all cases, you can have your cake and eat it, too. Real Estate Agents can work as Land Patent Clerks. Bar Attorneys can work as Counselors of Law. Medical doctors can choose to work as private physicians. And so on.
Many creative ways have been found to either limit your license or find ways to continue to work without a license —and as the Assemblies increase in size and strength more pressure can be applied to reform the licensing stranglehold of the European Guild System which has been inappropriately imposed upon Americans.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
In the January 22, 2021, lecture above, Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., discusses what he has dubbed the pandemic virus industrial complex — who they are, how they function and interact with elements within the academic, military and commercial complexes, and how they have been trying to obscure facts that indicate SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus that originated in a lab.
I have previously interviewed Latham a few times. He is the publisher of Independent Science News, a website that provides critical commentary on food, agriculture and biotechnology. It’s part of the Bioscience Resource Project, an educational nonprofit public interest group co-founded by Latham and Allison Wilson, Ph.D., that provides independent research and analysis of genetic engineering and its risks.
Latham points out that there are currently no data to suggest a natural zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2. On the other hand, there’s plenty of evidence and data suggesting the virus was genetically manipulated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. Much of the related research was done by a scientist called Shi Zheng-Li, Ph.D.
He goes on to summarize the Mojiang miners passage theory. This theory postulates that the virus evolved inside the bodies of six miners who became ill with a suspected novel coronavirus infection in 2012. Some of the miners were sick for several weeks — a sufficient amount of time for the virus to mutate, Latham believes.
Viral samples from the miners were sent to the WIV. Latham and Wilson believe research on these samples was what led to an accidental release of the virus in late 2019.
Latham describes the pandemic virus industrial complex as “an interlocking set of corporations and other institutions who feed off and support each other with goods and services in a self-reinforcing way.” It is an enterprise that leverages public money for private profit. He also notes that many of these participants play unexpected roles. For example:
“These nontraditional roles are intended to confuse and camouflage the various moving parts of what is a complex situation,” Latham says, “thereby protecting the whole from scrutiny.” While there are many similarities between the military industrial complex and the pandemic virus industrial complex, there’s an important difference between the two.
The pandemic virus industrial complex is public facing, and is expected to be beneficial and transparent. As such, it has an image of respectability that must be maintained, and that is why academics and philanthropic and nonprofit organizations play such important roles in this scheme.
Together, they help obscure the real agenda under a veneer of respectability and public good. In essence, they maintain the illusion that everything that’s taking place is for the betterment of mankind when, in reality, it’s a profit-making scheme.
Latham believes the pandemic virus industrial complex has played a decisive role in the effort to obscure the likely origin of the pandemic. He also believes this is the missing framework that helps explain the politicization of the pandemic.
In his lecture, Latham reviews some of the history of this viral pandemic industrial complex. In 2014, an Ebola outbreak in West Africa was decisively blamed on zoonotic transfer from infected bats. According to a report in EMBO Molecular Medicine,1 a 2-year-old boy playing with bats in a tree stump was Patient Zero.
However, while the paper failed to produce conclusive evidence to support its conclusion, Western media ran with this story. In West Africa, however, the rumor was that the real source of the outbreak was a hospital in Sierra Leone, which housed a biological laboratory where research on Ebola and related viruses, such as the lassa fever virus, was being done.
This research was largely funded by the U.S. Department of Defense. The reason for this funding was a recent upgrading by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the lassa fever virus as a Category A infectious substance, meaning a pathogen likely to be used as a bioweapon by terrorists. The research was carried out under the auspices of the Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium, led by Harvard University.
The Consortium is also tied to other academic institutions, including Tulane University, Scripps Research Institute, the University of California, San Diego, the Broad Institute of Boston and the University of Texas, as well as a number of private drug companies. According to Latham, statements made by some of the people involved in the research suggest they were taking advantage of West Africa’s lax and inferior biosecurity standards.
In his book, “The Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Corporate Gangsters, Multinationals & Rogue Politicians,” Chernoh Bah provides evidence showing the Patient Zero story was a fraud. The young boy died at 18 months of age, far too young to play with bats, and he was never diagnosed with Ebola. Neither was anyone in his family. The first recorded case of Ebola was actually found in Guinea, some three months after the little boy had died.
Bah also found other gaping holes in the narrative. For example, despite widespread sampling, no Ebola virus was ever found in any animal, and no animal die-offs occurred before the outbreak, which tends to be typical in natural zoonotic spillover events. Despite the obvious problems with the official narrative, no formal investigation of the lab leak theory was ever performed.
According to Latham, we can learn a number of things from this story. First of all, lab escapes are likely more common than we think, and widely considered zoonotic outbreaks may not be zoonotic in origin at all. Another example is the AIDS epidemic, which you can learn about in the book “The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS.”
The second thing we can learn from the West African Ebola story relates to the money trail. The U.S. Department of Defense funded the research done by the Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium. Other oft-used alternative sources are public health funding and international aid. Whatever the case, be it biodefense, public health funding or relief aid, the money comes from We the People.
Thirdly, corporate members of the Consortium had a specific business model in mind, and it had nothing to do with protecting vulnerable Africans from lassa or Ebola. The goal of drug companies is to sell vaccines, drugs and diagnostic tools, primarily to the U.S. or European militaries.
The fact that the 2014 Ebola outbreak narrative went unchallenged shows a disturbing lack of academic rigor, and it was certainly not the first time. As noted by Latham, scientists are failing in their role to pursue and promulgate knowledge and understanding.
“Instead, more and more frequently, academia creates fictions,” he says. They create “convenient, self-serving narratives.” Legacy media works hand-in-hand with such academics, acting as a megaphone for their dubious scientific claims.
One example of how businesses use academics to shape a narrative and manipulate public opinion was when, in May 2020, 77 Nobel laureates signed a public letter urging the U.S. government to reinstate funding to EcoHealth Alliance, which has subcontracted gain-of-function research on coronaviruses to the WIV. Earlier that year, then-President Trump had ordered the National Institutes of Health to cancel that funding.
The letter was organized by Sir Richard Roberts, a molecular biologist and Nobel Prize winner who also happens to be a senior executive with New England Biolabs, a manufacturer of laboratory equipment and reagents.
“Cutting funds for biotech virus research threatens their core business,” Latham says. So, is Roberts really a disinterested party? Or does he have a very keen interest in keeping dangerous gain-of-function research going, risks be damned?
Back in 2016, Roberts organized a similar campaign, in which 107 Nobel laureates attacked Greenpeace for supposedly blocking the approval of GMO golden rice.
The National Press Club in Washington D.C. brought nationwide attention to the letter with a formal press conference. One of the organizers of that press event was a former Monsanto PR executive, and the website created to promote the campaign was traced to the biotech industry.
“The point here is that there’s nothing spontaneous about these letters,” Latham says. “They’re carefully choreographed PR gambits … What is really being defended is the overlapping interests of companies like New England Biolabs and Monsanto. In this world, science and scientists are useful pawns with which to shape public opinion.”
One of the latest propaganda tactics employed in an effort to shape public opinion and discourage inquisitiveness is that if you’re concerned about the potential for lab leaks, you’re anti-science and a racist pro-Trumper.
If you file freedom of information act (FOIA) requests with scientists, you’re anti-science. If you question Dr. Anthony Fauci, you’re anti-science.2,3 If you’re against GMOs, you’re anti-science. If you’re against gain-of-function research, you’re anti-science. If you’re anti-nuclear energy, you’re anti-science. This is a ploy and nothing else. Sadly, this propaganda is now being spewed by even the most unlikely of sources, such as Mother Jones.
June 14, 2021, Mother Jones published a hit piece on the Center for Food Safety, penned by Kiera Butler.4 In May 2021, the Center for Food Safety sued the NIH in an effort to force the agency to reveal its funding of gain-of-function research.
“Virologists say this kind of research is vital and has led to many important medical discoveries, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. But Center for Food Safety argues that gain-of-function research is too dangerous to pursue,” Butler writes.
“Why would this lefty food and farms group … rail against high-level virology research? The key to the answer has to do with the Center for Food Safety’s long opposition to the practice of genetic engineering. In a recent phone call, I spoke to CFS’s Kimbrell, who explained what he sees as the connection.
‘You genetically engineer bacteria and plants, then you genetically engineer animals, then you genetically engineer embryos — all that has happened, with some promise, but also a tremendous amount of danger and threat,’ he said.
‘Now, viruses are not technically an organism, but they are living biological elements. So, they fit certainly within that narrative: Just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should do something.’
Kimbrell said he ‘absolutely’ thinks the pandemic was the result of an accidental lab release. Scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, he believes, used gain-of-function to enhance a coronavirus. The virus then escaped out of the lab, spread uncontrollably, and caused the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, in effect, gain-of-function research caused the pandemic.”
Butler also discusses the Organic Consumers Association, the U.S. Right to Know, the International Center for Technology Assessment, and Children’s Health Defense — all of which have raised questions and concerns about this kind of dangerous research on pathogens. According to Butler, they have no business questioning such research, and their involvement could put us all in jeopardy.
“With tens of thousands of followers on social media, anti-GMO groups have the potential to turn the tide of public opinion; hanging in the balance is science that could potentially help prevent the next pandemic,” she writes.
In true propagandist fashion, Butler goes on to rebut gain-of-function concerns with commentary from EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, Ph.D., one of the most conflicted individuals you could possibly find. Indeed, his conflicts of interest have become so widely known, he was recently removed from the Lancet commission charged with investigating the origin of COVID-19 because of it.5,6
Butler also goes to great lengths trying to paint the issue in political partisan colors, and quotes Dr. Peter Hotez, another highly compromised industry-funded player who has publicly called for cyberwarfare assaults on American citizens who disagree with official COVID narratives.
In a scathing rebuttal, Center for Food Safety founder attorney Andrew Kimbrell accuses Butler of “journalistic malpractice,”7 and rightfully so, in my opinion. She clearly tries to confuse readers by stressing that “gain-of-function” is a broad definition and that much of the gain-of-function research being done is both harmless and valuable.
However, that’s not the kind of research the Center for Food Safety or anyone else is concerned about. The Center for Food Safety’s lawsuit specifically pertains to the manipulation of pathogens in order to make them more virulent and dangerous to humans, and she didn’t interview a single mainstream scientist who has warned of the dangers associated with this practice, even though there are dozens of them.
Overall, Butler’s piece reads like classic propaganda, created by the very people with something to hide. As noted by GM Watch:8
“The Gates-funded Alliance for Science was quick to promote Butler’s article. They’re a PR campaign based at Cornell that pushes agrichemical industry views and tries to undermine the industry’s critics, particularly those critics concerned about GMOs.
As part of this effort, the Alliance for Science has been posing as an expert body on myths about the pandemic, even though they have no such myth-busting expertise. An early example of this was a piece they published by their employee Mark Lynas that branded GMWatch, among others, as conspiracy theorists for saying the virus may have accidentally leaked from a lab.
On Twitter, Mary Mangan, who sits on the Alliance’s advisory board, has been carefully tracking and commenting on exactly which ‘anti-GMO groups’ have been calling for the lab leak hypothesis to be taken seriously …
Interestingly, a reporter told HuffPost in relation to a court case involving Monsanto that she thought Mangan had tried to ‘play’ her to do a hit job on one of the expert witnesses critical of the company’s Roundup herbicide. Could it be that Ms Butler wasn’t so resistant to being played?”
Another clear propaganda piece was published by Hotez in The Daily Beast, June 21, 2021.9 In recent weeks, Fauci’s role in the pandemic has become increasingly clear, and it’s far from flattering. He funded dangerous research that may in fact have resulted in a global outbreak. Now, he’s trying to deflect blame by saying that personal attacks on him “represent an assault on American science,” and Hotez is doing what he can to strengthen that ridiculous notion.
To do so, Hotez takes it a step further, linking attacks on Fauci to attacks not only on science but also on the very foundation of democracy. According to Hotez, “moral courage and standing up for democratic values demands that the American people throw their full support behind scientists and scientific institutions. To do otherwise is to capitulate to the forces of insurrection.”10
Like Butler, Hotez spends an inordinate amount of time trying to paint concerns about dangerous research on pathogens that have the potential to kill us all as a far-right, racist, anti-science, anti-democracy issue, when it’s nothing of the sort.
When dangerous science has the potential to wipe out mankind, it is cause for concern among thinking individuals of all political persuasions. It’s not anti-science. It’s anti-recklessness, and to prevent another disaster, those responsible must be held to account for their actions. Clearly, not all science is dangerous. Being against recklessly dangerous science does not mean you’re against all science or science in general.
If we want to prevent another pandemic like this from occurring in the future, we must first determine the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and how it ended up in the population. If it can be proven that it came from a lab, then we need to identify and hold those responsible for its creation and release accountable for their actions and/or neglect and, lastly, we need to prevent a reoccurrence by banning research in which pathogens are purposely manipulated to make them more dangerous.
To get to the bottom of it all, we need to look at the pandemic virus industrial complex. We need to dissect how it functions and how its members interlink and work together to obscure the truth.
In the video above, DarkHorse podcast host Bret Weinstein, Ph.D., an evolutionary biologist, interviews Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,1 and Steve Kirsch, an entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID-19 gene therapies.
I realize that this is an absolutely epic three-hour interview but if you ever valued what I have been teaching, you must at a bare minimum very carefully read this entire article.
Malone is the scientist that actually invented the technology that makes the COVID jab possible and he spills the beans on just how this introduction has been ethically compromised to make informed consent absolutely impossible for the average person. Watch the interview if your schedule allows, but carefully read this article for sure.
Kirsch recently published the article, “Should You Get Vaccinated?” in which he reviews how and why he has changed his mind about the COVID-19 “vaccines.” This after he got both doses of the Moderna shot, as have his three daughters.
If you or someone you know is equivocal about the COVID jab, then please, you simply MUST read Kirsh’s article as it is clearly one of the best pieces written on the topic and provides the other side of the story that is NEVER given in the mainstream media. Remember, without full disclosure of the vaccine’s risk, it is impossible to have informed consent.2 If you read Kirsch’s article, you will get, in great detail, the other side that the conventional media refuses to share. He writes:
“I recently learned that these vaccines have likely killed over 25,800 Americans (which I confirmed 3 different ways) and disabled at least 1,000,000 more. And we’re only halfway to the finish line. We need to PAUSE these vaccines NOW before more people are killed.
Based on what I now know about the miniscule vaccine benefits (approximately a 0.3% reduction in absolute risk), side effects (including death), current COVID rates, and the success rate of early treatment protocols, the answer I would give today to anyone asking me for advice as to whether to take any of the current vaccines would be, ‘Just say NO.’
The current vaccines are particularly contraindicated if you have already been infected with COVID or are under age 20. For these people, I would say ‘NO! NO! NO!’
In this article, I will explain what I have learned since I was vaccinated that totally changed my mind. You will learn how these vaccines work and the shortcuts that led to the mistakes that were made.
You will understand why there are so many side effects and why these are so varied and why they usually happen within 30 days of vaccination. You will understand why kids are having heart issues (for which there is no treatment), and temporarily losing their sight, and ability to talk. You will understand why as many as 3% may be severely disabled by the vaccine.”
As explained by Malone, many months ago he warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that the spike protein — which the COVID-19 “vaccines” instruct your cells to make — could be dangerous. The FDA dismissed his concerns, saying they did not believe the spike protein was biologically active. Besides, the vaccine makers specifically designed the injections so that the spike protein would stick and not float about freely.
Well, they were wrong on both accounts. It’s since been well-established that, indeed, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gets free, and that it is biologically active and causes severe problems. It is responsible for the most severe effects seen in COVID-19, such as bleeding disorders, blood clots throughout the body and heart problems.
These are the same problems we now see in a staggering number of people having received one or two shots of COVID-19 “vaccine.” For more in-depth information about how the spike protein causes these problems, please see my interview with Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Judy Mikovits, Ph.D.
Using the word vaccine isn’t really appropriate here, and I don’t want to contribute to the misuse of that word. These injections are clearly not vaccines. They don’t work like any previous conventional vaccines. As the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccines clearly says in the interview, they are gene therapy. So, please understand that when I say vaccine or vaccination, I’m really talking about gene therapy.
In a recent interview3 with Alex Pierson, Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., discussed previously unseen research obtained from the Japanese regulatory agency through a freedom of information act request.
The study was a biodistribution study done by Pfizer, which showed that the mRNA in the vaccine does not stay in and around the vaccination site but is widely distributed in the body, as is the spike protein.4
This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding. I detailed these and other findings in “Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine.”
The spike protein also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries. Kirsch cites data suggesting the miscarriage rate among women who get the COVID “vaccine” within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy is 82%.5 The normal rate is 10%, so this is no minor uptick. Kirsch writes:6
“It is baffling that the CDC says the vaccine is safe for pregnant women when it is so clear that this is not the case. For example, one our family friends is a victim of this. She miscarried at 25 weeks … She had her first shot 7 weeks ago, and her second shot 4 weeks ago.
The baby had severe bleeding of the brain and other disfigurements. Her gynecologist had never seen anything like that before in her life. They called in a specialist who said it was probably a genetic defect (because everyone buys into the narrative that the vaccine is safe it is always ruled out as a possible cause).
No VAERS report. No CDC report. Yet the doctors I’ve talked to say that it is over 99% certain it was the vaccine. The family doesn’t want an autopsy for fear that their daughter will find out it was the vaccine. This is a perfect example of how these horrible side effects just never get reported anywhere.”
Disturbingly, the Pfizer biodistribution data package reveals that corners were cut in the interest of speed, and one of the research facets that were skipped was reproductive toxicology. Yet, despite the lack of an initial reproductive toxicology investigation and a rapidly growing number of reports of miscarriages (which is likely to be a significant undercount), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is still urging pregnant women to get vaccinated. Why is that?
What’s more, as discussed in the interview, there’s evidence that data in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is being manipulated as reports that were filed are now missing. Why were they removed? And without the filers’ consent?
Even with that manipulation, the number of deaths reported post-vaccination against COVID-19 is beyond anything we’ve ever seen. According to Kirsch, the rate of death from COVID-19 shots exceeds that of more than 70 vaccines combined over the past 30 years, and it’s about 500 times deadlier than the seasonal flu vaccine,7 which historically has been the most hazardous.
Other serious effects are also off the charts. For example, Israeli data show boys and men between the ages of 16 and 24 who have been vaccinated have 25 times the rate of myocarditis (heart inflammation) than normal.8 Additionally, many young people are actually dying as a result of this myocarditis.9
Malone points out that, in re-reading the most current version of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that governs these COVID shots, he discovered that the FDA opted not to require stringent post-vaccination data collection and evaluation, even though they had the latitude to do so.
As noted by Weinstein, this is yet another anomaly that needs an answer. Why did they opt for such lax data capture, because without it, there’s no way of evaluating the safety of these products. You cannot identify the danger signals if you don’t have a process for capturing effects data and evaluating all of it.
“The whole logic of EUA is you’re basically substituting real-time capture of key information for prospective capture of key information,” Malone explains. “But to do that, you’ve got to get the information and it has to be rigorous.”
Furthermore, as noted by Weinstein, if you release a vaccine under emergency use — because you say there’s an unprecedented health emergency and there are no other options, therefore it’s worth taking a larger than normal risk — then you still would not give it to people who are at no or low risk of the disease in question.
This would include children, teens and healthy individuals under the age of 40, at bare minimum. Children appear naturally immune against COVID-1910 and have been shown to not be disease vectors,11 and people under 40 have an infection fatality ratio of just 0.01%.12 That means their chances of survival is 99.99%, which is about as good as it gets.
Pregnant women would also be excluded as they are a high-risk category for any experimentation, and anyone who has recovered from COVID would be excluded as they now have natural immunity and have no need for a vaccine whatsoever. In fact, a recent Cleveland Clinic study13,14 found people who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at least 42 days prior to vaccination reaped no additional benefit from the jabs.
Yet all of these incredibly low-risk groups are urged and even inappropriately incentivized to get vaccinated, and this too is anomalous behavior. Part of the risk-benefit analysis is not only the risk of serious outcomes and death from the disease, but also the availability of alternative treatments, and here we have the third massive anomaly.
We’ve seen a clear suppression of information showing that there are not just one but several effective remedies that could reduce the risk of COVID-19 to a number of cohorts down to virtually zero. Examples include hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, both of which have been safely used for decades in many millions of people around the world.
The precautionary principle dictates that as long as a drug or treatment strategy doesn’t do harm, even if the positive effect may be small, it should be used until better data or better treatments becomes available. This is the logic they used with masks (even though the data overwhelmingly showed no statistical benefit and there are a number of potential harms).
But when it comes to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, they suppressed the use of these drugs even though they are extremely safe when used in the appropriate doses and have been shown to work really well in many dozens of studies. As noted by Kirsch in his article:15
“Repurposed drugs [such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin] are safer and more effective than the current vaccines. In general, early treatment with an effective protocol reduces your risk of dying by more than 100X so instead of 600,000 deaths, we’d have fewer than 6,000 deaths. NOTE: The vaccine has already killed over 6,000 people and that’s from the vaccine alone (and doesn’t count any breakthrough deaths).”
Doctors are also being muzzled and their warnings suppressed and censored. Dr. Charles Hoffe has administered Moderna’s COVID-19 “vaccine” to 900 of his patients. Three are now permanently disabled and one has died. After writing an open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry, the provincial health officer for British Columbia, in which he stated that he’s “been quite alarmed at the high rate of serious side-effects from this novel treatment,”16 his hospital privileges were yanked.
In a May 30, 2021, essay,17 Malone reviewed the importance of informed consent, rightly concluding that censorship makes it so that informed consent simply cannot be given. Informed consent isn’t just a nice idea or an ideal. It is the law, both nationally and internationally. The current vaccine push also violates bioethical principles in general.
“By way of background, please understand that I am a vaccine specialist and advocate, as well as the original inventor of the mRNA vaccine (and DNA vaccine) core platform technology. But I also have extensive training in bioethics from the University of Maryland, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, and Harvard Medical School, and advanced clinical development and regulatory affairs are core competencies for me,” Malone writes.
“Why is it necessary to suppress discussion and full disclosure of information concerning mRNA reactogenicity and safety risks? Let’s analyze the vaccine-related adverse event data rigorously. Is there information or patterns that can be found, such as the recent finding of the cardiomyopathy signals, or the latent virus reactivation signals?
We should be enlisting the best biostatistics and machine learning experts to examine these data, and the results should — no must — be made available to the public promptly. Please follow along and take a moment to examine the underlying bioethics of this situation with me …
The suppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID vaccines which are based on gene therapy technologies cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise. It is my opinion that the adult public can handle information and open discussion. Furthermore, we must fully disclose any and all risks associated with these experimental research products.
In this context, the adult public are basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial.
And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents and the young, which by definition are not able to directly provide informed consent to participate in clinical research — written or otherwise.
The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration.18 There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects.”
Experimentation without proper informed consent also violates the Nuremberg Code,19 which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles were developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.
In the U.S., we also have the Belmont report,20 cited in Malone’s essay, which spells out the ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, covered under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46 (subpart A). The Belmont report describes informed consent as follows:
“Respect for persons requires that subjects, to the degree that they are capable, be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them. This opportunity is provided when adequate standards for informed consent are satisfied.
While the importance of informed consent is unquestioned, controversy prevails over the nature and possibility of an informed consent. Nonetheless, there is widespread agreement that the consent process can be analyzed as containing three elements: information, comprehension and voluntariness.”
Americans, indeed the people of the whole earth, are being prevented from freely accessing and sharing information about these gene therapies. Worse, we are misled by fact checkers and Big Tech platforms that ban or put misinformation labels on anyone and anything discussing them in a critical or questioning way. The same censorship also prevents comprehension of risk.
Lastly, government and any number of vaccine stakeholders are encouraging companies and schools to make these experimental injections mandatory, which violates the rule of voluntariness. Government and private businesses are also creating massive incentives to participate in this experiment, including million-dollar lotteries and full college scholarships. None of this is ethical or even legal. As noted by Malone:21
“… as these vaccines are not yet market authorized (licensed), coercion of human subjects to participate in medical experimentation is specifically forbidden. Therefore, public health policies which meet generally accepted criteria for coercion to participate in clinical research are forbidden.
For example, if I were to propose a clinical trial involving children and entice participation by giving out ice cream to those willing to participate, any institutional human subjects safety board (IRB) in the United States would reject that protocol.
If I were to propose a clinical research protocol wherein the population of a geographic region would lose personal liberties unless 70% of the population participated in my study, once again, that protocol would be rejected by any US IRB based on coercion of subject participation. No coercion to participate in the study is allowed.
In human subject clinical research, in most countries of the world this is considered a bright line that cannot be crossed. So, now we are told to waive that requirement without even so much as open public discussion being allowed? In conclusion, I hope that you will join me; stop to take a moment and consider for yourself what is going on. The logic seems clear to me.
1) An unlicensed medical product deployed under emergency use authorization (EUA) remains an experimental product under clinical research development.
2) EUA authorized by national authorities basically grants a short-term right to administer the research product to human subjects without written informed consent.
3) The Geneva Convention, the Helsinki declaration, and the entire structure which supports ethical human subjects research requires that research subjects be fully informed of risks and must consent to participation without coercion.”
Again, if your schedule allows, I sincerely hope you take the time to listen to Weinstein’s interview with Malone and Kirsch. Yes, it is very long — about 3 ½ hours — but they are all astute in their observations, which makes for an enlightening conversation. And remember to read and widely share Kirsch’s article, “Should You Get Vaccinated?”22
Clearing of the Chimera group continues. The war between Light and dark forces for Chimera underground bases is at its peak, and the decisive battles ending in Light forces liberating the bases are expected to occur soon.
The Chimera underground complex which extends below the central part of eastern Congo and below most of Rwanda and Burundi has not been liberated yet, and hostages captured there and in other bases still need our assistance with meditation:
This underground war precipitates to the surface as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions:
Galactic Confederation fleet, especially Ashtar Command, Pleiadian and Sirian fleet, are moving closer to the surface of planet and Mjolnir (quantum cannon) weapons are now deployed in Near Earth Orbit in icosahedral formation to continue clearing quantum anomaly and all dark force exotic weapons in all surface and subsurface layers of the planet, physical and non-physical.
Mjolnir is particularly targeting etheric scalar weapons grid which was created by the Orion dark forces during the invasion of 1996.
Scalar waves are produced when two opposing waves of the same frequency exactly cancel out each other:
They can be misused to create strong etheric fields that can capture souls after they leave their physical body through the death process, and this capture is exactly what happens to most humans on the surface and most hostages in underground bases.
Also, scalar fields can be misused to attack Lightworkers and to induce emotional pain, energetic discomfort and also physical pain by triggering central nervous system.
As Light Forces progress toward the surface, the dark are attacking key Lightworkers with those scalar weapons, falsely hoping that this will slow the progress of the Galactic Confederation fleet.
The main thing slowing the progress of the Confederation fleet is the so called subquantum anomaly. Subquantum anomaly is the part of quantum anomaly which extends throughout the whole universe on scales smaller than Planck length (10 e-35 meters) and can not be detected by any means, according to the so-called trans-Planckian censorship conjecture:
This practically means that the Light forces can not detect it, even in their Ascended state, they can only guess its effects after it begins to influence objects larger than Planck length, so basically all particles and waveforms in our universe. The Orion dark force scientists have learned through experiments spanning many millennia and sometimes even millions of years how to trigger subquantum anomaly to produce anomalous effects in our universe. Throughout the universe, this can only produce a very thin quantum fog, whereas close to the surface of this planet it triggers serious quantum anomaly which significantly hinders the progress of the Confederation fleet and also significantly decreases the efficiency of the Light forces in general. They are now fully addressing this problem and there are already signs of progress.
The most dangerous phase of the planetary liberation war lasted from December 2017 to May 2021 and things are finally beginning to look a bit better now, although the danger is far from over.
As a positive sign on the surface of the planet, the Syrian goddess vortex shows signs of healing:
Drastic military escalation in Israel and Gaza was prevented, with the help of Egyptian positive factions, with the help of our meditation, and other factors:
There are some signs of escalation again, and if they persist, you may continue with the above meditation if you feel so guided.
Mainstream media are finally beginning to talk about the laboratory origins of covid:
Which was created in cooperation between China and USA:
It was created as a trigger defense mechanism against the progress of the Light forces in planetary liberation, and dark forces are threatening to release more viruses if Light forces continue to progress:
Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and others are being exposed for their role in the creation of the pandemic, and will answer for their crimes against humanity:
Fauci threatening people wishing to expose him will not stop the exposure:
Connections between Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are being explored:
Here it is interesting to note that Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine’s father, was involved in the PROMIS scandal which included putting backdoors in all Windows based computers on the planet, feeding data to Israeli intelligence agencies:
PROMIS software is now outdated and has been evolved further, livestreaming data about the surface population:
This data is being processed by the Israeli Intelligence agency, called Unit 8200, at Urim base:
And by NSA here:
Both Urim base and Utah data center have been hacked by the Resistance on June 8th and that led to internet outages worldwide and to some speculations:
Chimera-controlled DARPA and other agencies still keep developing nanotechnology biochips:
And protein based bioweapons for mind control:
And micro biochips:
The spread of many rumors and disinfo on various internet sites has reached such proportions that some of those items need to be addressed.
First, Ashtar is a being of Light, there is NO negative Ashtar Command and they are NOT involved in any kind of betrayal whatsoever.
Second, Med beds will NOT be introduced to the surface population before the Event, and they are NOT related to Tachyon chambers whatsoever.
Third, the only true Tachyon chambers are listed on tachyonis.org website, and many other people claiming to build tachyon chambers or even handing out plans for those chambers are not telling the truth. On the surface of this planet, a functional tachyon chamber needs a quantum uplink to an orbiting satellite or a space station.
There is a certain project involving tachyon chambers, and those owners of the tachyon chambers who wish to participate, can contact email@example.com. They need to be aware that in order to participate in the project, their chamber will not be available for regular healing sessions for at least a few months. Participation in this project is completely voluntary.
Fourth, a brief disclaimer. I am not involved in any activities whatsoever of a person named Manuela Tayara, nor is she receiving any instructions from me.
Fifth, Sisterhood of the Rose groups still need to be formed worldwide, to anchor as much Goddess energy as possible.
And most importantly, the Light Forces have communicated that energies of wars that were fought on the surface of the planet through millennia finally need to be healed, and souls still trapped in the war trauma released.
For this reason, cintamani stones need to be planted in the positions of all main past battlefields:
Light Forces have also communicated that the timeline of Thirty Years War (1618-1648) needs to be healed, and cintamani stones need to be placed into the key areas and battlefields of this war, as this was one of the most brutal conflicts in human history:
With this timeline node resolved, a lot of healing energy will be released on the surface of the planet.
Victory of the light!
The video above features the first of several tribunals1 on COVID-19, in which we expose the willful misconduct that runs like a red thread through the entire pandemic narrative. This first one is sponsored by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a 501c3 nonprofit organization chartered to educate and empower you with information that promotes health and happiness for you and your family.
The panel, consisting of a number of experts from different fields, including scientists, doctors, authors, activists and attorneys, is hosted by Alexis Baden-Mayor. The topic, of course, is COVID-19, which has risen as the most important topic of our lifetime.
Collectively, the panelists, which include yours truly, have spent well over 75,000 hours investigating myriad events that make up the global response to COVID-19, from its likely lab origin, to where we are at present. As noted by Baden-Mayor, we find ourselves “trapped in a web of questionable science and rampant acts of alleged willful misconduct with no apparent and insight.”
“Collectively, our panelists have published groundbreaking books, lawsuits and peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts on the subject of COVID-19 that currently form the foundation of many ongoing legal efforts, attempting to protect the inalienable rights of billions of good people worldwide,” Baden-Mayor says.
“It has been more than a year since the SARS-CoV-2 virus came into public awareness, and what began as two weeks to flatten the curve has morphed into a never-ending emergency. Is this still an emergency? And if so, why are we empowering the same people to lead us who have already proven their own incompetence?
At the very least tonight, we will take up the work that should have been performed long ago by mainstream media networks that have consistently vacated their duty to impartially investigate and objectively inform their audiences. We will ask the hard questions to people who have been censored and vilified simply for lifting their voices to help people throughout the world.
Some of the questions we pose may feel uncomfortable at first, but are nevertheless essential to our collective freedom and our children’s future. And some of the answers you hear may challenge the narratives you’ve been conditioned to accept. We will listen as our expert panelists share verifiable information, and invite you to decide for yourself whether the information you are hearing has merit.
This tribunal does not exist to tell you what to think or what you need to know. This tribunal of experts has gathered to empower you, to think for yourself and create opportunities for you to take action.
The alleged acts of willful conduct threaten not only our freedom, but also unnecessarily prolongs the crisis by preventing the free exchange of ideas and clinical information that saves lives. We will embark on a historic journey together in search of answers to hard questions and solutions to challenging problems …
If you are like the billions of people who have felt that something just isn’t right, and you don’t know who to trust. I assure you, you are not alone. Take heart and have courage together. We are going to make sure COVID-19 comes to an end. And most importantly never happens again.”
The speakers and panelists featured in this first tribunal, in addition to myself, are:
Dolores Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist,2 founder of the World Freedom Alliance3 and a member of the World Doctors Alliance,4 which is committed “to debate the causes of harm resulting from the coronavirus act measures and to raise issues that expose harmful medical and life-limiting practices detrimental to the well-being of all living men women and children”
Kimberly and Foster Gamble, creators of two THRIVE documentaries5
Kevin Jenkins, executive director of the Urban Global Health Alliance6 and producer of the censored documentary film “Medical Racism: The New Apartheid”7
Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and co-author of “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection” in the American Journal of Medicine.8,9 McCullough is one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States
Joy Fritz, a former death records clerk10 and contributor to The Defender11
Ronnie Cummins, co-founder and international director of the OCA and its Mexican affiliate Via Organica12
Tara Thorton, co-founder of the Freedom Angels Foundation, which fights against tightening vaccination regulations13
Dr. James Lyon Weiler, Ph.D., a research scientist, president and CEO of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge14
Anna Garner, founder of New Mexico Stands Up!, a volunteer-driven organization that provides public interest legal services to restore essential rights and health freedom15
Dr. Henry Ealy (“Dr. H”), a certified holistic nutritionist, founder and executive community director of the Energetic Health Institute16
Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMed Info17
David “Avocado” Wolfe, a raw food advocate18
The first roundtable discussion starts off with a prerecorded video featuring Cummins and me. Our full-length discussion was summarized in “The Book You’ll Want to Read Before It Disappears.” I’ve included it again, above, for your convenience. The book in question is “The Truth About COVID-19,” which we wrote together.
In that book, we review how the COVID-19 pandemic was never a pandemic in any real, historical sense, the tactics used to keep the fraud going, the likely origin of the virus, the less-than-humanitarian intentions driving the pandemic narrative as a whole, censored prevention and treatment strategies, the potential hazards of COVID-19 “vaccines,” why vaccine passports are a ticket to totalitarianism and much more.
Anyone who has looked at the U.S. federal vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) will be struck by the shockingly high number of serious injuries and deaths occurring after receiving the COVID-19 “vaccine.”
Many of these occur within the first 24 to 48 hours after taking the vaccine, which ought to raise automatic questions. Yet the timing of these injuries and deaths are ignored, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration insists that none of them has any relation to the vaccines,19 which simply isn’t believable. As noted by Baden-Mayor:
“As of April 16 , the following information is confirmed: At least 3,186 Americans have died after receiving experimental COVID injections. At least 1,015 of those deaths have occurred within 24 hours. According to the various medical records, at least 115 expecting mothers have spontaneously aborted their babies or given birth to stillborn babies after receiving experimental COVID injections.
At least 86,080 Americans have reported some form of injury post-injection, including at least 6,282 people who have required hospitalization due to the severity of their injuries.
We support everyone’s right to access experimental COVID injections, but it is important to note that they are not FDA approved. Currently the clinical trials are ongoing until October 27, 2022, for Moderna, the NIH study until January 2, 2023, for Johnson & Johnson, and April 6, 2023, for the Pfizer-BioNTech.
Under current informed consent laws, you have the right to decline the use of any experimental product without fear of job loss, discrimination or segregation from the society that you paid taxes to support. It is your body. It is your choice.”
These numbers are skyrocketing by the day. As of April 23, 2021, the total number of adverse reports had jumped to 118,902, 12,618 of which were serious and 3,544 of which died.20 While shocking as is, the real numbers are undoubtedly even higher, as VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on voluntary reporting.
Historically, less than 10% of vaccine side effects are reported to VAERS.21 An investigation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services put it as low as 1%.22,23
What this means is side effects may actually be 10 times or even 100 times higher than reported. We could, in reality, be looking at anywhere from 126,000 to 1.2 million serious side effects, and anywhere from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths already.
Making matters even worse, it appears VAERS is backlogged by about three months, so the data you see on VAERS does not reflect the true, real-time numbers of adverse reactions being reported.
This is important to know, since the system’s primary goal is to “detect new, unusual or rare vaccine adverse events” as a way to monitor safety of vaccines, and the greater the backlog, the more people will be exposed to a potentially dangerous vaccine. A backlog by months also suggests an enormous number of adverse effects are happening, and that in and of itself is incredibly disturbing.
It is also highly likely that the majority of the deaths from the vaccine will be due to antibody?dependent enhancement (ADE) or paradoxical immune enhancement (PIE), as detailed in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System” and “Will Vaccinated People Be More Vulnerable to Variants?“
We will not see these deaths until the fall, because that is the typical season when coronavirus infections occur, be it SARS-CoV2 or other coronaviruses responsible for the common cold. So, when exposed to a wild coronavirus, there is indeed a risk that ADE response, due to pathogenic priming, will produce an excessive and potentially lethal immune reaction.
As noted by McCullough during the roundtable discussion, something very unusual happened in 2020. For the first time, doctors around the world were actively discouraged and prevented from saving their patients. There was “an enormous, complete, pervasive, steadfast suppression of any attempts to help patients with COVID-19,” he says.
He points out that esteemed medical facilities have developed effective treatment protocols for COVID-19, including Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Emory, yet these have all been suppressed and censored.
“It’s stunning,” McCullough says. “By this time, we should be using the Harvard protocol, the Emory protocol. How about Hopkins? I’ll take any one of them … We seem to somehow have developed a uniform game plan … to do nothing to help patients with COVID-19, passively allow as much suffering hospitalization and death as possible, create enormous amounts of fear in our society, and then be prepared for mass vaccination.”
Fritz, a certified death reporting clerk who has worked for years assisting doctors and acting as an interface between funeral homes and state and federal reporting agencies, is now helping families correct death certificates that inaccurately list COVID-19 as the cause of death.
March 24, 2020, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a COVID alert that some say has led to significantly inflated and therefore fraudulent death counts.
In response to Baden-Mayor’s questions, “Did the COVID alert No. 2 lead to inflated dead counts? And what are some of the problems associated with the death certificate reporting that make the process susceptible to data manipulation and therefore significant inaccuracy?” Fritz replies:
“For context, the COVID No. 2 alert and the follow-up NBSS April guidance was issued within two weeks of the emergency being declared in March 2020. Their explicit guidance was given before there was any population-wide testing available to statistically determine the infection fatality rates, so we didn’t have probability [data] yet.
Yet, without any population surveillance available, any good data, they asserted that COVID would be the underlying cause of death ‘more often than not.’ They made a declaration of statistical probability before there was national statistics available. Then they disseminated this unfounded probabilistic rationale to those who officially report, approve, code and tally our mortality statistics.
People need to understand the importance of the underlying cause of death. If you look at a death certificate, it has a bunch of information on it. The underlying cause of death is the diagnostic code you pick to report in our mortality statistics. That’s the one cause that’s going to be reported about that patient. It’s very important.
Normally, before this, infections were not given as the underlying cause of death, for the most part, for patients over 60 years old. I got a lot of cases where the doctor is saying it was MRSA, an antibiotic-resistant form of staph that’s really hard to treat and can kill people.
The vital records registrars would reject death certificates that had underlying cause of death with MRSA and say, ‘Go back and ask the doctor what they were on medication for. Did they have diabetes? Did they have chronic illnesses?’ So, this flies in the face of what I was used to, as far as infections being highlighted as the underlying cause of death as a rule.”
Fritz goes on to review what happened the last time the National Center for Health Statistics had a governing committee make recommendations regarding contagious or vaccine-preventable disease. On page 139 of the 2003 report from this panel, the committee asked how to address questions such as “Was a contagious disease present at time of death, or did the death result from a vaccine preventable disease?”
“The committee subgroup on death certificates decided against the death certificate being updated to include those risk factors,” Fritz says. The committee stated that “the death certificate is not a medical record and is not intended to include prevalence data.”
“This is a very important part of what the precedence was, before this pandemic, about contagious and vaccine-preventable diseases on death certificates,” Fritz says.
“They intentionally, in 2020, changed this with the COVID guidance. They created this lopsided reporting system — and they didn’t make it for all contagious diseases — they just made it for COVID. So, it’s naturally going to create a ballooning of reporting for this one contagious disease.
Then, if you look at the context, these are experts at our statistical regulatory bodies. They know about the statistics on death certificates and [the importance of] accuracy. These guys know that — according to peer-reviewed medical literature, across the board, in every continent in the world — 20% to 60% of our death certificates have the wrong or an inaccurate cause of death listed.
So, we have a major margin of error that these experts already knew about. And now they’re manipulating the system to milk out the information … without fixing the system. That’s very problematic.”
While Fritz is trying to help families correct death certificates that incorrectly list COVID-19 as the cause of death, that task just got more difficult. She recently received a text from her local government in California, advertising that FEMA is now giving families $9,000 to cover funeral expenses if your loved one died from COVID-19, and the way you prove that is with a death certificate listing COVID-19 as the cause of death.
What’s more, this payment program will go on to 2025, so it not only deincentivizes people from correcting death certificates issued in 2020, but incentivizes the continued mislisting of COVID-19 as the cause of death presently and into the future, using bribery.
Fritz is founding a nonprofit 501c3 organization called the Factual Reporting Advocacy Network to help educate families, medical officers, certifiers, mortuaries and others about the importance of accuracy in death certificates, because it affects national and global statistics, which in turn drive all sorts of funding, such as medical research.
She’s also pushing for an independent national audit of COVID-19 death records to establish true cause of death and to update the certificates accordingly.
The OCA tribunal, which is three hours long, features roundtables with nine additional panelists. I hope you take the time to listen to all of them. Roundtable 2, which begins at the 50-minute mark, includes Sayer Ji, Dr. Ealy and Jenkins, who discuss willful misconduct as it pertains to medical ethics.
Ji reviews how public health officials have failed to honor the ethics of medicine and what can be done to correct course and serve those who are desperately looking for answers. As noted by Ji, you cannot make ethical medical decisions unless you know both the risks and the benefits, so the censorship of medical information is, in a very real sense, a violation of human rights.
March 23, 2021, Ealy published a peer-reviewed paper, “COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During a Global Health Crisis — An Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct,” available for free reading and download on GreenMedInfo.24
In it, he substantiates McCullough’s allegation of rampant, wanton misconduct among public health officials, the active suppression of safe and effective treatments, and pandemic measures being implemented based on incorrect assumptions and outright lies.
One lie that allowed for the implementation of draconic measures was that SARS-CoV-2 was being spread asymptomatically. There’s no evidence of this, and from a virology standpoint, having a respiratory infection without symptoms is highly unlikely.
The PCR test being used as a diagnostic tool is also problematic, as revealed in the Corman-Drosten review,25 headed by former Pfizer chief scientist Dr. Michael Eaton. The test was developed before a viral isolate was available, which means we don’t even know if it’s detecting the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus. On top of that, health agencies instructed labs to use excessive amplification cycles, known to result in massive numbers of false positives.
Ealy also discusses a paper26 written in collaboration with team of other investigators published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, titled, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective.” This paper details how the CDC has enabled the corruption of case- and fatality-reporting data in violation of federal law.
The panelists also address racial disparities, such as how communities of color are being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, both the illness and pandemic measures, and the U.S. government’s history of knowingly withholding evidence-based cures.
Ealy also points out that the CDC has known for the past 20 years that 35% to 45% of Americans are deficient in vitamin A; 37% to 46% are deficient in vitamin C; 65% to 95% are deficient in vitamin D; 60% to 84% are deficient in vitamin E; and 11% to 15% of Americans are deficient in zinc.
These are key nutrients to mount an effective immune response. Yet no guidance has been issued for correcting these widespread nutritional deficits — not in the past, and not now, even though a large body of research now shows vitamins C, D and zinc play a crucial role in preventing COVID-19 and improving outcomes.
You also don’t want to miss Jenkins’ impassioned speech in which he strips the pandemic down to the bare bones and exposes what it’s really all about. It’s about turning mankind into slaves. It’s about systemic annihilation. They want to control our bodies and minds, and to do that, they must first strip us of our freedom. That’s what this pandemic is all about.
“I’m here to hurt your feelings today,” Jenkins says. “I’m not here to make you feel good. The bottom line is you are … locked out of the truth because you’ve allowed it to happen. This is the year of action.
A year of taking it all back. This is a year of flying free … We are at war for humanity. This has nothing to do with race. Race is a distraction … Are they censoring because you are black or white? They’re censoring us because we’re telling the truth.
Big tech, big pharma, finance, education — they’re all working against us. We have failed, all of us. So, you’ve got to get up. Come join us at Urban Global Health. Come join us at Freedom Airways.27 Join all of the other groups.”
Roundtable 3, which starts around the 1 hour 30-minute mark, includes Cahill, Lyons, Weiler and Garner, who review issues revolving around questionable science and the law. Cahill begins by reviewing the absolute lack of empirical evidence supporting the use of face masks, social distancing and lockdowns as a mitigation strategies to reduce viral spread.
Cahill’s organization, the World Freedom Alliance, recently launched the Hope & Accountability project, also known as The European Spring, which aims to hold decision-makers and doctors accountable for their scientific misconduct. Notices of liability are being sent off to members of the European Parliament, Presidents and Prime Ministers across Europe, as well as ministers for health and the regulators. She explains:
“A notice of liability, which is based in the rule of law, [specifies] that harm is not really done by big organizations. Harm is done by one man or woman to another man or a woman.
Responsibility rests on individual people, and on their roles, for example, the prime minister, the minister for health — but also the individual who is the head of the regulatory agency — that if there are several deaths in a country, the regulators … in each individual country, are required by law to stop the clinical trial.
They’re also required to give full informed consent so that everybody enrolled in these gene therapy, so-called vaccinations, are required to be informed about the adverse events. And you are not allowed to enroll people that cannot give consent, such as those with dementia …
Under law, you are accountable as individuals for what you do, and what you fail to do. But of course, the person that’s most responsible is the person that actually put that needle into those people. And that, in our law is a severe crime, contributory manslaughter. So, the people who are involved in administering [these injections] … and cause huge [numbers of] adverse events and death, they will be accountable.”
Weiler delves into further details about the unscientific use of PCR tests, serious flaws in the tests’ design, the many ways in which false positives can be created, and the mechanics of how your immune system actually works to fight infection.
Garner, an attorney and founder of New Mexico Stands Up! discusses potentially landmark cases filed in defense of American people, and the importance of relying evidence-based science when making public health decisions.
“We were doing what we can to get the word out and get it to the courts, which may be our last bastion — the wall that could fall down in terms of the lies that we’re being told,” she says. “We have been told so many lies, we’ve been told lies about the number of cases, we’ve been told lies about the number of deaths caused by COVID.
Fear has absolutely wrecked everybody’s sense of proportion of what’s right and wrong. And this is a battle of right versus wrong, because those of us who haven’t drunk the cocaine, as I call it, rather than the Kool-Aid, know that everything about this is so wrong.
We’ve been deprived of our fundamental inalienable God-given rights, our right to breathe oxygen, for goodness sake, our rights to socialize with our fellow man. We need hugs, we need socialization, especially as developing children. And that’s where our next level of litigation is going to take us.”
Garner recently sued the New Mexico Governor, challenging the state of public health emergency, which is based on lies, including the use of a basically meaningless test to diagnose infection.
“If that PCR test is considered to be the bottom card of this house of cards that we have been dealt, if we pull that out, I think the rest of the house of cards has to collapse,” she says. “And that means that the orders, the mandates, the restrictions that have been put in place as a result of this declaration are all null and void.”
Garner is also filing a case on behalf of children, based on a German victory, in which a mother sued, saying forcing her child to wear a mask at school and during fitness classes was child abuse. The judge agreed, ruling that it constitutes child abuse and granted injunctive relief. Garner’s case will be the first of that kind in the U.S.
“I can’t emphasize how much that people need to know what their rights are. If they don’t know what their rights are, they’re going to continue giving them up. And that’s exactly what they’ve done. They’ve given that their right to breathe.
They’ve given up their right to have free exercise of their religion with fellowship and singing, and sitting close to people in the bench. They have given up their rights to be able to assemble with their friends and family in numbers greater than five.
This whole thing is just insane. And those of us who are looking at this and going, ‘This is insane,’ need to realize that we’re the ones who aren’t insane, and try to help people come back to some level of reasonableness.”
Garner is in need of donations and volunteers, including brave, hard-nosed attorneys willing to fight for the rights and freedoms of Americans, so please donate or sign up to volunteer on NMstandup.org.
In Roundtable 4, starting around the 2 hour 18-minute mark, Wolfe, Thorton and the Fosters turn to the more spiritual side of things and discuss how we can nourish and inspire ourselves and others to take action on behalf of humanity. Again, I hope you watch this video in its entirety, and share it widely with everyone you know. Together, we can get through this, and, as you can see, you’re not alone.