Pizzagate Exposed: Part 5

NOTE: As I was writing this column, I discovered that the Wikileaks site has gone down. So some of the screenshots of the e-mails included here are low quality since I couldn’t pull them directly from Wikileaks.

In my last column, I said my part 5 of this series would include the one e-mail in the Podesta E-mails that I believe to be the most damning and disturbing when you look at all the evidence. So let’s get into it!

If you haven’t read my other articles in this series, please click here to start from the beginning.

On Oct. 8, 2015, Tamera Luzzatto sent an e-mail to John and others cc’d about their upcoming visit to a farm in Lovettsville.  In that e-mail she wrote: We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility.  Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson and Maeve (11, 9 and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in the pool for sure.

For starters, this e-mail is alarming because you have a woman explaining that she’ll be providing children for an adult get-together for “entertainment”.  Further suspect, Luzzatto makes a point to list the ages of the children.  I want to note that when traffickers sell children, they usually always advertise the ages of the kids.  Their pedophile clients want to know the ages of the children because most of them have certain age preferences.

Now here’s what makes this e-mail the most damning.  The sender, Luzzatto, had an online business that dates back to at least 2009.  (Note this is seven years before the Podesta E-mails were released.) She ran a members-only secure website, that required a password for entry, titled Evie’s Crib.  The site boasted photos of Luzzatto with babies and toddlers. Luzzatto is the same woman who worked as Hillary Clinton’s Chief of Staff when she served in the U.S. Senate until 2009. So Luzzatto ran this site as she worked in a top position for Hillary.

The main page of her site showcased this header alongside a photo of an infant: “Evelyn is growing up, soon she will be Queen of the entire US of A, right now, for a limited time only, you can spend time with her online, raw and uncut.”  Please re-read that last sentence and keep in mind “raw and uncut” is synonymous with porn language.  So what did she mean when she said you could view the infant raw and uncut?  The caption on the site continued:  “Take advantage of this now, as in the future she will have the power of life and death over you.”

More disturbing, some of the tabs on the site are labeled with these horrific titles: baby ambien, filth, malpractice, psychopath, parental manipulation, Ponzi schemes, tranquilizers, public intoxication and EWB.  EWB is an acronym for evil white bitch. 

In another blog post, Luzzatto writes: “Evie doesn’t know it yet, but she is looking forward to many visits to the farm with cousins Ruby Emma and Maeve.”  So in this post, Luzzatto references most likely the same children she did in the Podesta E-mails and the farm again.

On Evie’s Crib, there’s also a link to a blog featuring a baby named Jack.  Luzzatto writes, “Jack is owned by Ken Weber and Stephanie Copeland, who live a few blocks from us.”  Have you ever heard someone refer to a child’s parent as his or her owner? 

On this blog, Ken and Stephanie posted a photo of a naked boy with this post: “It was bath time again this weekend, which Jack celebrated in high style by slipping into the baby bath hammock (thanks Sarah C!).  Before reuniting with the frog towel, Jack luxuriated (and exfoliated) in a warm soak by the kitchen window.”  Here’s the statement that followed that’s most concerning:  “Unrated version of this photo available only to premium subscribers ;)”. Can anyone think of a logical and innocent reason why someone would promote “unrated versions” of naked photos of babies and toddlers or images of them “raw and uncut” that does not involve child porn? Consider the language and images I just laid out and the fact that this kind of content is displayed on password protected and monetized sites.

So to recap, Tamera Luzzatto broadcasted that people can spend time with infants “raw and uncut” on her password protected site.  This is the same woman who provided children, who were featured on her site, for an adult party for “entertainment” according to her own e-mail in the Podesta E-mails dump released by Wikileaks.

Moving along, on April 11, 2015, Jim Steyer wrote to John and his wife, Mary Podesta, cc’d with billionaire Tom Steyer in an e-mail with the subject “walnut sauce”:  Hey John, We know you’re a true master of cuisine and we have appreciated that for years…But walnut sauce for pasta? Mary, plz tell us the straight story, was the sauce actually very tasty?

Walnut sauce is believed to be code for a child of color or possibly code for adrenochrome since a walnut looks similar to an adrenal gland.

On April 10, 2015, Eleanor Clift wrote to John: Hi John, I completely understand why dinner at your home did not include someone like me, who’s a known quantity to Clinton campaign veterans.  But I wanted to make an appeal for a early opportunity to get myself and the Daily Beast political editor, Jackie Kucinich, on your radar so I/we can report knowledgeably.  There’s a long campaign ahead, and I’d like to establish a line of communications.  Is there an assistant I should go through? I look forward to working with you (and maybe getting some of that pasta and walnut sauce dish!!) All best, Eleanor

Moving along from walnut sauce, here’s an e-mail with a blatant Satanic reference.

On July 31, 2015, AmseleM sent this e-mail, from the Wikileaks Hillary Clinton e-mail archive, to W Lewis: With fingers crossed, the old rabbit’s foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch… Tri

A rabbit’s foot is popularly known to bring good luck but some Christians would argue that superstition is closely related to witchcraft.  Moloch is a Pagan deity or demon associated with child sacrifice originating back from the Canaanites.  The Bible strongly condemns practices associated to Moloch, and in the Old Testament, it has been used as a variant for Baal.  On a side note, chicken is another well-known code word for pedophiles.  A chicken lover is defined as an adult who is sexually attracted to children.  So this e-mail illustrates that this person is referencing the sacrificing of an animal – if we are to take the word chicken to mean a literal chicken – to a demonic deity of child sacrifice.  Now when you read this e-mail consider how so many of them are clearly into Satanism through their art – do you think this reference to Moloch is a joke or literal?

Click here to read my column on Tony and John Podesta’s Satanic and Pedophilic art collection.

I think it’s important to highlight one more e-mail that the Marco Polo organization recently released in their Hunter Biden E-mails dump that’s relevant.  An e-mail from Eric Schwerin to Hunter Biden sent on March 30, 2016 reads this:  PRESIDENTIAL PIZZA: Maddy Beckwith, Ezekiel Emanuel, Tony Podesta and Chris Putala are hosting a pizza party for Hillary Clinton next month featuring campaign chair John Podesta, senior policy adviser Maya Harris, and pizza chef James Alefantis of Comet Ping Pong.  A maximum $2,7000 contribution includes a special reception with John Podesta.  And all Clinton logo haters need to check out this version, which has pepperoni pizza slices for the arrow…

This is most likely the Hillary logo this e-mail referenced:

This finishes up my reporting specifically on the Podesta E-mails; however, this series is far from over so please keep checking back. Before I conclude, I want you to look at this tweet that Hillary put out in 2015 linked to an NBC News article stating her “Campaign Is Powered By Pizza”:

Ask yourself, does this tweet now have new meaning to you now?

You can donate to me here.

You can support me by shopping at my store here.

You can find links to all my social media, articles, videos and more here at my website.

“Excess Death” — Yet Another Filthy Euphemism

 By Anna Von Reitz

My Fourth Grade teacher, Doris Condie, hated euphemisms with a rare passion.  Whenever she caught someone using a euphemism, like “passed on” for “died”, she would quietly correct them — whether child or adult. 
Her argument was simple but devastating. 
When you don’t call something by its real name, you aren’t being honest — not with yourself, and not with others. 
There’s no reason to have fifty words or phrases all meaning the exact same thing, unless you want language to be watered down and confusing, or have some reason to obscure what you are talking about.  
So don’t call inchoate States-of-States “Confederate States”, because they aren’t really States at all. 
Don’t tell me you’re “indisposed”.  Tell me you’re sick. Tell me you are taking a shower.  Tell me whatever is true, but don’t use a euphemism.  
They make my skin crawl. 
Among all the different kinds of lies there are, euphemisms are the closest to lampreys, and that is ironic, because they are almost always created and invoked to make someone feel better, to soften the blows of reality.  
You’re not short, you’re height challenged.  
You don’t have bad breath, you’ve got halitosis issues. 
You aren’t poor, you’re economically disadvantaged. 
And while all these people are busy pussy-footing around and being so  “politically correct” — a euphemism for wishy-washy flannel-mouthed rats, the truth gets bypassed, because the actual message doesn’t get sent. 
A couple months ago another new euphemism leaped onto the world stage: “excess death”.  
What they are talking about is the increase in the overall number of deaths taking place in all age groups and all social strata since the Vermin deployed the “vaccine” that doesn’t prevent infection, doesn’t prevent transfer of any disease, and doesn’t prevent symptoms of anything, but does appear to be linked– circumstantially– to “excess death”.  
Maybe you or one of your family members experienced “excess death” this fall, one of the 40 percent more healthy robust people to just fall down dead for no apparent reason. 
Forty percent more.  That’s a helluva lot of “excess death” above and beyond anything that we would normally expect to see.  Almost half again as many deaths as normal.  Instead of a hundred corpses at your Funeral Home, you are seeing 140.  
That’s not “excess” that is wild beyond all probability.
That’s millions of more deaths every week, every month, and, so far, yes, every year.
The Undertakers can’t keep up.  The Coroners either.  The Death Business is absolutely booming.  The supply chain boondoggles mean fewer coffins delivered.  The buildup of “excess deaths” means we are running out of conventional morgue and freezer space. 
Hospitals and Nursing Homes are quietly bringing in refrigerated semi-truck trailers and parking them in the back parking lot, filling them up with “excess death participants”.  
Sounds like the Stiffs were playing a game, or staging a live action play, doesn’t it?  
How about just saying all these beautiful, lively, spunky people died long before their time, taking their skills and insights and talents with them, leaving the rest of us bereft. 
And why don’t we stop calling it “excess death”?  Let’s just call it what it is — death caused by for-profit corporations “making a killing”— literally. 

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna’s website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Answering the critics of “Died Suddenly”

You can watch his video here:

Then you can read the rebuttal I just got from Ryan Cole, MD and decide for yourself who is telling you the truth and who is lying to you. Please ask Dr. Burnett if he will accept Dr. Cole’s invitation to resolve the matter. He will never accept the invitation.

Eric Burnett, MD is an internist, not a pathologist, nor mortician. The arrogance of inferring that a mortician, a professional, beyond his experience, cannot make a valid observation beyond his own naïveté, is the epitome of hubris. He has likely seen one or two autopsies in his entire career. He has not seen, observed, nor described countless post mortem clots. A gelatinous saddle embolus is “apples to oranges” compared to these post “clot shot” death clots. He has never embalmed a body. He is entirely and exceedingly out of his lane. Post mortem, rubbery clots are as rare as hen’s teeth. He is likely covering his “gene injection” pushing ass. Morticians did not have trouble cannulating and embalming bodies prior to the jabs. He is acting as a bloviating, pharma, financial and hospital administrator defending shill, having zero experience, nor idea of what he speaks.

Something is overwhelmingly wrong with the “clot shot.” If he were half awake, his conjecture would not be reflecting  the myopic view of the inside of his inexperienced anus.

With a modicum of humility, he might acknowledge alarming rates of excess deaths in the hyper injected, young and healthy and see the actual harm of failed gene based experimental injections, that have maimed and killed hundreds of thousands to millions.

Having performed countless career autopsies, examined dozens of these novel clots, extensively explored the spike protein clotting mechanisms, diagnosed over 500,000 patients through the microscope, in my extensive career, I invite my colleague, Dr. Burnett, and any colleague, from around the world, to sit at my microscope, and observe the truth, and set aside their purchased pride. The cells don’t lie!!!

Honor the dead who speak loudly. Stop fantasizing that you can ever vaccinate ahead of an always mutating coronavirus, especially with a “variant expired” investigational gene product.

Honor your oath to “first do no harm,” instead of hiding behind an uninformed ego, shaded with harmfully naïve, humanity destroying pride.

Here’s the “fact check

The “fact check” says:

  1. In the video montage of people who died suddenly, there is no information on some of these people that they were vaccinated. And there is no PROOF that the vaccine CAUSED the death.

  2. The quote from Gates was taken out of context.

He’s right on both points!

  1. It would be more convincing if the fact checker could rule out the vaccine in the cause of these deaths. But he does not.

  2. I’ve personally heard Gates express his rationale for how the vaccine reduces population growth (the argument is that families will need to have fewer kids because more will survive).

He missed one too which I will point out: the footage shown at 47:45 of a man falling off a chair near his long desk is not recent. That footage came out in early Jan. 2020.

I’m sure there are other errors. And I think the implications of this being a conspiracy to depopulate the planet is not well supported.

The big point is that our “fact checker” conveniently ignores the primary claim about the embalmers. That’s the meat of the story here. Over 100 embalmers are seeing “never before seen” clots only in people who have been vaccinated or received blood transfusions. The embalmers I’ve talked to are seeing these clots in over half the deaths. The fact check is silent on the major point of the movie. There’s a reason for that: there is no way to refute it or provide an alternate explanation. So they hope that their fact check will cause you to avoid watching the film by focusing on parts that are less convincing.

The embalmer observations are not debatable. Anyone who tries to debunk it will fail. The cells don’t lie.

This is why no mainstream media reporter will touch this story and why Dr. Burnett will never accept Dr. Cole’s kind offer.

Haunted Thanksgiving

 By Anna Von Reitz

It was perfectly obvious to me at age seven that LBJ and the CIA killed Jack Kennedy.  There was never any doubt. My parents shot glances at each other across the kitchen table. They knew, too.  
They didn’t want to know, but they knew. 
If we all knew, why don’t you?  Why does there continue to be any veil of doubt or ignorance at all? 
I think we all knew and still know.  It’s just that some of us had guts enough to own it. 
My hero in those days was Jim Garrison, a Texan, who knew the truth, too, and dared to say it, “Lee Harvey Oswald was a patsy.” 
It was such a relief to hear a grown up come out and say it.   That’s why I loved Jim Garrison then and the reason I still remember him like a lighthouse tower in a time of darkness.  
And I watched this country coil in pain and rage and most of all, confusion.  How could something like the JFK Assassination happen here? 
How could the Warren Commission Report or all the whitewash since ever be “accepted”? 
It wasn’t accepted by me.  Not a bit of it. 
LBJ and CIA, FBI and M16.  
Jim Garrison, a grown up, thought the same things as me.  He fingered them for the crime. He exonerated Oswald. And he stood his ground, like the best men in Texas always have. 
He gave me hope that Justice would be done. 
But the people in this country wimped out and failed.  The majority were so hurt they just wanted to push forward into any future they could find, and I think we all felt helpless, too. 
What do you do when those entrusted to uphold justice are dirty, rotten skunks? 
So the great and terrible Thanksgiving week of 1963 rolled on; Jim Garrison stood tall from the beginning to the end of all that was to come. 
And me? I named my white rabbit Lee Harvey Oswald. 
Nobody but my Father understood why. 
It was all I could do in my childish way to memorialize a young man who died as a scapegoat.  I knew Lee didn’t do it. I could see it in his eyes: hopeless fear. I heard it when he told the reporters, “I’m a patsy!” 
I had no doubt that he was. 
My Father sat down in his favorite chair one night, and hefted my seven year-old self and my white rabbit, Lee Harvey Oswald, onto his lap.  He petted the rabbit’s ears and nodded. 
Sometimes his silence was more than enough. 
No need to tell him what had really happened, or why I named my rabbit after Lee Harvey Oswald. 
Years later when my rabbit died there was a tiny white popsicle-stick cross in the flower garden with Lee Harvey Oswald’s name printed on it. An innocent young man, only 24 years old, who loved his country and who was horribly betrayed — by the Vermin, and by us all, just keeping our heads down and moving along like a herd of sheep in a rain storm. 
I have paused every year since then and thought about it all at Thanksgiving time, about JFK, and Jim Garrison, and Lee Harvey Oswald — and how this whole country, one way or another, myself included, has failed them all. 
The CIA got away with it.  LBJ got away with it. JFK and Lee Harvey Oswald paid for it.  Jim Garrison stood almost alone—- a little girl and a white rabbit in Wisconsin notwithstanding. 
We have all paid for it in our hearts and souls, because we didn’t hold the Vermin to account for it.  There was no justice for JFK or Lee Harvey Oswald, either one. 
And now, the seeds of that have spread so that there is no justice for any of us. 
I did read the Warren Commission Report when I grew up enough to read it.  
Then I took out to the back forty, tied it up with twine, and used the block of paper for target practice.  It was already so “full of holes” it quickly succumbed to the .22 caliber fusillade, followed by some .357 shots,  followed by some Winchester 30.30’s from my old deer rifle, and finally a few  good blasts from my Mom’s twelve gauge, fired from the hip, using 00 buckshot.  
It was a lovely fall day, crisp and sunny, and I stood looking at the demolished target, the Warren Commission Report reduced to bits of white paper littering a hillside in Old Wisconsin, bits of it beginning to flutter away in the wind. 
Seemed like a fitting end to it.  
Perhaps I should have taken a picture of it to send to the bureaucrats in Washington to tell them how I really felt about it? 
Then there was Wounded Knee, and Pine Ridge, and Ruby Ridge, Ollie North, and Waco, the Twin Towers, and another Blue Ribbon Committee Report not worth the paper it was printed on, and now you wonder how “our” elections could be stolen? 
Did you miss the raid on the CIA Offices in Frankfurt, Germany? 
All these evils, all the lies and false flags and murders and everything else, are being perpetuated by the CIA and other misdirected “Intel Agencies” that are being paid for out of the Public Purse but not operated for the Public Good.
These elections are skewed the same way the CIA/FBI Combo does everything else: by fraud, violence, deceit, propaganda, non-disclosure and abuse of power, by acting under color of law, by the cowardly pigs in Congress standing by and doing nothing at all about any of the alphabet soup Agencies, and by people like us never asking the question: how did these unelected, unaccountable, out of control Agencies get a license to bully and kill and steal from the rest of us?  
How do they get off entrapping people on American soil? 
How do they have any right to surveillance us? 
Looks to me like we need to be the ones doing the watching — rat watching. 
I can tell you how the feckless members of Congress have worked it, and numerous political administrations, too.  It’s easy. They create these Three Letter Agencies and hire them to be their storefronts and sock puppets. 
DOJ?  Created by the Scottish Interloper that impersonated our government after the Civil War, to function as an in-house law firm to protect the Vermin from the Public—- paid for at Public expense. 
CDC?  A private, for-profit corporation used for illegal purposes by the DC Swine like Fauci, using Federal grant money as leverage to get any “scientific” results they want.  All at Public Expense. 
NIH?  Same thing. 
WHO?  Same thing. 
Go to any University Campus and you can order any scientific results and whatever scientific opinions from so-called “experts” that you want.  Just bring your purse. 
Wave the carrot of government graft and you can have whatever results you want, made to order, and never mind the facts or the logic. 
The Pandemic is just more of the same, once again brought to us all by misdirected Government Agencies that have no actual authority at all. 
And now we have “the QFS” — another CIA Op coming to us from their new bosses in China. Note the name of the Operation: Crimson Gate, a gate being opened into your backyard and into your pockets and blood streams by CIA Contractors working out of Wright-Patterson. 
We still owe a debt to JFK and his family and to Lee Harvey Oswald and his family, too. 
That debt is to clean up the Royal Swamp that has been substituting itself for our American Government.  All of it. 
Beginning with the DOJ, the FBI, the IRS, the CDC, the NIH, and the CIA.  And all the politicians and Boards of Directors standing behind them, misdirecting them.  
Remember the slain and the innocent and the heroes like Jim Garrison this Thanksgiving. In between the Turkey and the cranberry sauce—
size up what you can do to return this country to sanity. 

We have a debt to pay, but it’s not to the IRS. 

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna’s website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

C-19 Injections: Massive Regulatory and Manufacturing Fraud

By: Tessa Lena

  • Alexandra Latypova is an ex-pharmaceutical industry and biotech executive with a lot of experience in the areas of drug safety and clinical trials

  • Early on, she discovered that, based on the number of reported deaths and adverse events per lot, there was unprecedented variability in the toxicity of the product

  • According to Alexandra, the mRNA shots do not conform to their label specifications, and “in practice, both ‘blank’ and ‘lethal’ vials and anything in between is produced”

  • Having analyzed massive amounts of publicly available data, as well as documents that became available as a result of FOIA requests and other sources, she has found strong evidence of manufacturing and regulatory fraud

Visit Mercola Market


I recently had the pleasure of interviewing Alexandra Latypova, an ex-pharmaceutical industry and biotech executive, who has been investigating and exposing manufacturing and regulatory fraud related to COVID injections.

We talked about the industry standards that were not adhered to during the clinical trials and the manufacturing of those injections, about the vial content quality testing procedures that had not been put in place, about the “hot batches” and their geographical distribution, about signs of fraud at every stage of testing and manufacturing the product, and about the general condition of living in a world run by a mob.

The latter was the lightest part of our conversation — evoking a lot of dark Eastern European humor — since both of us are Soviet expats, and in 2020, neither of us required a whole lot of imagination to embrace the existential possibility of living in a world run by a mob. We had seen it in the past without a disguise — and when something looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, maybe it’s just a duck!

Alexandra grew up in Soviet Ukraine and immigrated to America in the late 1990s. She received her MBA from Dartmouth College and the spent about twenty five years in pharmaceutical industry and biotech (including in the areas of drug safety and clinical trials).

Alexandra has had a very gratifying entrepreneurial career. She has founded a number of successful startups, sold them — all before COVID — and retired, hoping to focus on enjoying her life and especially painting, which she does masterfully.

When 2020 knocked on the door with a whole bag of ugly and weird “new normal” treats, Sasha smelled the rat right away. Initially, she became alarmed by the abnormalities in “COVID response,” including the very conspicuous campaign to prevent effective treatment of COVID.

Compelled to understand what was going on, Alexandra got to work. She looked at VAERS and discovered huge discrepancies between the lots, where some batches had just a few reported severe adverse events, and some had over 1500 (she later learned from FOIA’ed documents that lot sizes were in a relatively similar range, and thus the discrepancies could not be explained by the lot size).

And when it comes to VAERS, let’s not forget the 2010 Harvard Pilgrim study showing that VAERS was severely underreported — NOT overreported — capturing less than 1% of adverse events.

Early on, Alexandra discovered the existence of “hot batches.” She is one of team members behind the famous “How Bad Is My Batch” webpage where people can look up the number of severe adverse events reported to VAERS associated with a COVID injection lot number. Other fearless members of the team are Dr Mike Yeadon, ex-head of Pfizer Respiratory Research, Jessica Rose, statistician, Craig Paardekooper, researcher, and Walter Wagner, lawyer.

The slide below show the unprecedented variability of serious adverse events and deaths in the U.S. per batch. Note the comparison to the variability of the flu vaccine lots.

In the interview, Alexandra also mentioned the uneven distribution of deaths per a hundred thousand doses from batch to batch in the U.S. The coasts did much better than some of the Midwestern states that showed a very high numbers of reported deaths per a hundred thousand doses. The worst state is South Dakota (30+ reported deaths per 100,000 doses).

The areas that did even worse, according to Alexandra, were some of the U.S. territories with high percentage of indigenous population. (The latter data became available after the presentation was created, not reflected in the slide.)

In the interview, Alexandra calls the COVID injections products “garbage soup,” both due to the massive non-compliance of the vial content to the specifications (per multiple independently done tests) — as well as due to their non-compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices. Wait, are the manufacturers trolling us? Are telling us that they do not comply (but we must)?!

There are many theories about what’s behind for such wild inconsistency between batches, from manufacturing defects to deliberate toxicity testing — and anything in-between. In her TrialSiteNews article, Alexandra tackles one important angle of the challenge that so many of us had to “explain” when talking to the friends of a more mainstream persuasion:

“Many of us are familiar with the following conundrum: on one hand, highly credentialed scientists and doctors have written numerous research papers explaining the dangerous mechanisms of action underlying mRNA/DNA “platform” technologies. The papers are meticulously researched and depict, correctly in my opinion, many terrifying consequences of the technology that breaches the innate protective mechanisms of human cells.”

“Furthermore, these theoretical papers are validated by the observed outcomes, such as for example, increases in all-cause mortality in high correlation with increases in rates of vaccination in a given territory, unprecedented increases in the adverse events and deaths recorded by various passive reporting systems, astonishingly high reports of the adverse events and deaths from the pharmas’ own pharmacovigilance systems, and autopsy findings in vaccinated post-mortem showing the mechanisms of mRNA technology damage in histopathologic evaluations.

On the other hand, many who have received the injections report no adverse effects and deem the points above a ‘crazy conspiracy’.”

“The question from the uninjured seems to be – why don’t we see MORE deaths if what you say about mRNA products is true? Setting aside ethical limitations of this question, here is a possible answer why: The mRNA shots do not conform to their label specifications. In practice both “blank” and “lethal” vials and anything in between is produced [emphasis mine].

Like I wrote earlier on my Substack, “remarkably, some analyzed vials were reported to contain left over magnetic beads (magnetic beads are used in production of mRNA). Remember the “crazy” videos of some people developing magnetism in the place of injection? Now we have a new, ‘non-conspiratorial’ explanation for the ‘conspiratorial’ videos! Yay, following the science!”

According to Alexandra, vials of mRNA injections are not routinely tested by the manufacturers for conformity to the label. She notes that “the more they conform to the mRNA specification, the deadlier they seem.”

The only vial-level tests specified, for instance, by Pfizer, in leaked Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls documents, are the vial weight at filling, manual inspection for large visible particles, and some tests related to integrity such as vial capping.

The documents don’t describe no routing vial or dose tests verifying the ingredients. Each Pfizer dose is supposed to contain 30 mcg of mRNA, as stated on the label, but there is no information about any testing done to verify that.

“The ingredient conformity tests described in Pfizer CMC package are based on the bulk product batch testing – an upstream manufacturing process step.

It is a regulatory requirement to retain samples of each batch produced, and these samples of vials should exist and be available for examination. Per contracts with the US Government/DOD, the product is shipped to the DOD who retains the ownership of the vials until the product is injected into people.”

Alexandra notes that those contracts are very detailed and specify manufacturing data to be delivered to the DOD, however, she not find any descriptions of sampling of the vials for purposes of verification of their contents vs the label. “Furthermore, it is expressly forbidden by the international vaccine supply contracts to perform the vial tests for label conformity.”

In the interview, as well as in this article, Alexandra talks about the evidence of collusion between the manufacturers, the global regulatory agencies, and the US Department of Defense.

Having analyzed various public data from CDC’s VAERS database as well as various documents that have been obtained through FOIA releases and other source, she concluded that such collusion “led to the commercial release of the Covid-19 countermeasures that do not comply with the current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP).”

Evidence that Alexandra talks about includes Moderna’s non-clinical study summaries, Pfizer’s Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls documentation, and contracts between pharma and the DOD for supply of the mRNA/DNA products. According to her, “it reveals disregard for established safety rules, regulations, and safety practices throughout the development, manufacture, and distribution of these products.”

As reported by Children’s Health Defense, Alexandra reviewed 700 pages of documents that Moderna submitted to the FDA as part of its application process and obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request.

And according to her, “out of nearly 700 pages, about 400 pages are irrelevant studies that Moderna repeated multiple times. Moderna also submitted three versions of a single module, she said. And one module contained only narrative summaries of Moderna’s studies, but no actual study results.” Alexandra’s conclusion is that we are missing a large number of results, such as full reports that would support their narrative.

“The FDA ‘obviously did not object’ to any of this, she said. ‘That’s evidence of collusion to me with the manufacturer.’”

Other “abnormalities” that Alexandra highlighted both in the interview and in the Children’s Health Defense article, were Moderna’s clinical trials timeline and the fact that their product has two — not one — Investigational New Drug (IND) number.

Normally, there is one IND application for one product. “In this case, however, there are two IND applications — one belonging to Moderna, and one belonging to the National Institutes of Health, which partnered with Moderna on its COVID-19 vaccine.”

“The Investigational New Drug (IND) application meeting is supposed to occur with the FDA when the company initiates human clinical trials. Moderna and the FDA had a pre-IND meeting on Feb. 19, 2020, and the IND application was formally opened the next day. The global pandemic was declared on March 11, 2020.”

In the words of Alexandra, “Somehow these visionaries could predict the future with such certainty that they opened a clinical trial for the vaccine, for which a pandemic was announced a month later.”

As Alexandra notes in her article titled, “Did Pfizer Perform Adequate Safety Testing for its Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine in Preclinical Studies? Evidence of Scientific and Regulatory Fraud,” “both the manufacturer and the regulators behaved in a highly dishonest manner and conspired to push an entirely novel technology and product on millions of people without carrying out a single well designed safety assessment.”

For example, she points out that a review of clinical studies released by FOIA uncovered that at least 4 different variants of active ingredient were included in the single Investigational New Drug application by Pfizer IND#19736:

  • BNT162a1 — Unmodified mRNA (uRNA; variant RBL063.3)

  • BNT162b1 — Methylpseudouridine-modified mRNA (modRNA; variant RBP020.3)

  • BNT162b2 — Methylpseudouridine-modified RNA (modRNA; variant RBP020.2)

  • BNT162c2 — Self-amplifying unmodified mRNA (saRNA; variant RBS004.2)

Alexandra writes that while the use of multiple versions of a product in the early stages of development is often inevitable, each chemical or biological entity is nevertheless deemed legally distinct for the purpose of product approval.

“Therefore, studies conducted with versions of the product that don’t conform to the exact specification of the final version may serve only as supporting information for the approval of the latter, but they should never be deemed definitive and sufficient tests for claims of safety or efficacy pertaining to the final product.”

She further mentions that in September 2021, the FDA issued a draft guidance entitled “Studying Multiple Versions of a Cellular or Gene Therapy Product in an Early-Phase Clinical Trial,” which states that each version of product requires a separate IND application.

However, stunningly, “a footnote in this guideline exempts ‘vaccines intended to prevent infectious diseases’ from this requirement. No explanation is given as to why this exemption is made, and no conceivable scientific or legal basis exists for this exemption, other than that the FDA had already arbitrarily allowed this unprecedented deviation from the regulatory standard and later needed to cover their tracks.

In fact, arguably this regulatory ‘exception’ does not even apply to Pfizer’s COVID-19 ‘vaccine,’ since the product does not prevent infection or transmission of the disease. Is intent to prevent illness alone a sufficient condition? After all, every new drug is intended to do something like preventing an illness, but only few successfully do so.”

Alexandra’s article is very detailed, and I highly recommend reading it in full. You can also find Alexandra on TrialSiteNews and on her Bitchute channel. To summarize her take on Pfizer, she make the following points:

  • Pfizer’s program did not include a comprehensive end-to-end test of all components of the final approved product (the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine). Instead, the studies included in the document package submitted to the FDA employed several variants and analogues of the product, whose comparability to the actual COVID-19 vaccine was not demonstrated or evaluated.

    Thus, no comprehensive assessment of product safety can be made on the basis of these studies.

  • A key determinant of a drug’s toxicity is its distribution within the body. However, with the mRNA active ingredient of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, this crucial aspect was never studied!

  • Pfizer claimed absence of potential for “vaccine-elicited disease enhancement” based on studies of an animal species that does not get sick from SARS-CoV-2.

  • The CDC, the FDA and Pfizer all lied about “vaccine staying at the injection site;” they knew all along that distribution of the vaccine throughout the body had to be expected.

  • Pfizer skipped major categories of safety testing altogether.

  • Pfizer used dishonest and self-serving interpretation of regulatory guidelines to justify the shortcuts it took in routine safety testing.

  • Both FDA and Pfizer knew about major toxicities associated with gene-therapy medicines in general, and they therefore cannot claim lack of anticipatory knowledge of these risks with the particular gene therapy medicine that is Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. This points to intentional fraud and collusion between Pfizer and the regulators, who conspired to push this untested dangerous product on the market.

Even though it is rather disheartening to know we live in a world that run by a mob, the challenge is centuries old, and remembering it can bring us much needed perspective and balance. The novel and “sudden” part of the challenge is that is happening to us, here and now, in broad daylight. That’s shocking! But throughout history, many of our ancestors had to deal with tyrants, and today, it is our turn to be brave. May our brave ancestors be our inspiration.

I would like to end this story with a short quote from my earlier article titled, “Is Our World Run Like a Mafia? So What Do We Do?:”

“Good news: As the mafia bosses do their predatory thing, something mysterious is happening the hearts of those of us who insist on love. Under pressure, we are forced to remember that we are not theirs.” We are not theirs. It is true.

To find more of Tessa Lena’s work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.

>”,”action”:null,”class”:null}”>NEXT ARTICLE >>

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

Where is the Money?

 By Anna Von Reitz

Isn’t the answer obvious?  It’s where it’s been (illegally) since 1863.  
It’s in the possession and control of the U.S. Military and all their various minions administering the equally illegal National Banking Emergency Act and National Securities Emergency Act: the Federal Reserve and the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements — and all of which crimes against our Government and our People, remain largely unabated. 
Soldiers and sailors don’t know much about money, except how to spend it. 
Nobody from first-to-last wants to take the blame for it, because these are all capital hang-from-the-yardarms crimes. 
We could do what I’ve suggested, and blame Abraham Lincoln and FDR for it, both of whom are long-dead and who are the point sources for the worst of it, but tempers (and fears) are running high. 
The actual government of this country has offered amnesty in return for cleaning this Mess up, but some people are aware of just how Draconian the Uniform Code of Military Justice can be and they fear what their own hands have done. 
Many corporation CEOs, doctors, nurses, and attorneys are just waking up to the fact that they are occupying military offices. That means that scumbags like Bill Gates and insiders like Warren Buffett aren’t considered civilians when it comes to this. 
It also means that many of these “officers” are fleeing like rats from a sinking ship, tearing up their Bar Cards and leaving their posh medical practices behind, trying to find a nice safe out-of-the way hole to hide in. 
This is adding to the overall chaos and clamor, especially in places like New York and DC.   For a great many of the elite members of society, this is Cover Your Butt (and your neck) time. Entire hospital staffs have been decimated and a great many people have taken “early retirement” to avoid being complicit (or further complicit) in the jab debacle. 
Add to this,  somewhere just woke up for the first time in 160 years and realized the function of Central Banks — that they are commodity rigging enterprises, and while they primarily rig the supply of money and credit, they also rig labor markets and more conventional commodities like orange juice and sow bellies.  
Since we began our quest to reclaim and recoup American gold and silver resources and hold the banks and collection agencies(IRS) accountable for failure to provide our exemptions and remedies, a giant kerfuffle has begun on a worldwide basis with all the various governments and Agencies and banks trying to simultaneously: (1) cover their butts and (2) blame someone else.  
The U.S. Military, aka, the British Territorial Raj of _________ (fill in the blank with the name of your country) is resisting the inevitable denouement and remediation.  Right now the big struggle is over who gets to spawn and profit from the next generation of “notes” and what form those “notes” will take. 
The British-Chinese-controlled replacement for the UNITED STATES, INC. wants to put a Chinese-style Social Credit system in place, which would allow their government Draconian control over buying and selling activities worldwide.  
It’s just another kind of commodity rigging scheme that uses computer surveillance and “keys” and algorithms to do the same thing Central Banks do, but they do it on the level of each individual.  
You don’t like someone?  You turn off their bank account and steal their money with a keystroke.  
That kind of oppressive power can never be allowed to any government.
Especially not a backdoor British Raj Government pretending to be Chinese. 
The people pushing this are British in Chinese clothing, and they speak perfect Mandarin.  They are the elite bankers of Hong Kong and Shanghai who have been schooled by the Bank of England for more than a hundred years.  
They, not the Communist Party, are the Comptrollers in China— and if we sit still for it, they will shortly be telling you which brand of state-sponsored mayonnaise you can buy.
They will also be telling you when to sit down and when to wipe your butt and when to die, because Bill Gates sold them the technology to “imprint” your bodies with 5G “resonant Dot” technology that was delivered via the Covid-19 vaccination. 
So, you’ve got Idiot Joe, and you’ve got Trump, who is a sharp businessman, but not, apparently, able to do more than stand in the background like a cheerleader spinning narratives.  
The bid by Larry Fink (BlackRock) and the Bush Clan (Vanguard) didn’t work out, because, once again, someone woke up and realized that the entire mortgage industry worldwide is crooked, and so is the insurance industry.  None of those asset claims can hold water. 
The top Barristers in England and the top Jurists in the United States have now concluded the obvious — that this entire system which has grown up over the past 100-plus years, is inherently criminal, built on fraud and coercion and unbridled racketeering under color of law, enforced by “District Courts” as in “District of Columbia Courts” which have no proper authority to exist outside of the District of Columbia.
The fight over “going digital” –an option provided by the CIA Operation nicknamed “Crimson Door” for a reason, versus a Cash Economy is crucial.  Humanity has to win this one. 
And if we go for a cash economy, whose cash do we use? 
The Government corporations are reduced to operating on somebody else’s credit (ours) so they have to use Notes.  Naturally, their attention is centered on creating more and more and more credit for themselves, not on creating more valuable assets — which is short-sighted in the extreme, but nonetheless true. 
The most obvious and most immediate answer is to use the Kennedy Dollars that JFK and Marcos agreed upon and which have been sitting in “uncut” condition in warehouses since the 1960’s, but the U.S. Navy doesn’t think that they could control these well enough to keep them from disappearing like dew in the morning, straight into investor’s pockets and out of the actual economy.  And we are not willing to give an “Open Endorsement” to authorize unbridled printing of gold certificates against our assets, so there would be no way to keep up with worldwide consumer demand. 
The Navy is probably right about the “snowflake on a grill” assessment for the use of Kennedy Dollars, as hoarding instincts are at an all-time high and investors are perfectly desperate to find convenient, fungible, gold-backed investment options.  What is brewing now makes the shortage of MTN’s for banks and institutional investors look like a child’s tea party and it bleeds down to the consumer level. 
So, then, what?  The frontrunner for a cash economy would then be the “United States Note” which would be based on the value of all US Corporations and would make the Corporations the slaves instead of the people.  Of course, the Brits and certain other parties in Rome are kicking like Army Mules against that idea, but it would work, and there is a certain poetic justice to it.  

There is also our Global Federation Dollar, which would be based on the value of all resources, natural resources and created products and labor, worldwide.  The GFD is a natural and desirable option because it includes everyone’s assets as a market “value” parameter and that then gives everyone a seat at the table and an incentive for doing good in the world. 

The only way the currency gains ground is if the nations get off their butts and take care of the oceans and forests, and invest in your health and your education. Such a “positively incentivized” currency has many social and practical advantages, not the least of which is its ability to act as a hedge against local market losses. 
Oh, excuse me, but you mean — where is your relief right now?  Your money as in, money in your bank account? Money that our team has been fighting to get to you for months?  It’s held up in the squabble of how and with what do we replace the infamous Federal Reserve Note? 
The Federal Reserve Note is going bye-bye so with what, exactly, are we going to pay you — and with what transfer system? 
Right now, your money is safe enough, piled up in vaults and symbolized as digits, but the digits have to pay out in some specific form, and if it’s no longer viable to use Federal Reserve Notes — what species of credit note can the government  run on?  
That question and the means of delivering your monetary relief, as digits or as cash money, are being fought over and many big, vicious dogs are in the fight. I am not a big, vicious dog at all.  I’m a Great-Grandma from Big Lake, Alaska, who happens to hold the key to it all. 
Sooner or later, they have to talk to me. So far, they’ve been running and hiding for seventeen years, but in the end, it still comes down to me, the lonely Fiduciary for The United States of America, Unincorporated. 

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna’s website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.