Strange Alive Worm-Like Fibers Found in Face Masks Produced for COVID


  • THE STORY:It sounds like science fiction, but it’s real life. Strange, microscopic fibers that move of their own volition have been found by many independent researchers worldwide embedded in the disposable masks used for COVID.
  • THE IMPLICATIONS:It is too early to say precisely what these mask fibers are, however they certainly resemble Morgellons fibers – synthetic and self-aware.
mask fibers

What are these strange, alive, worm-like mask fibers being found worldwide? Is this indicative of a nanotech invasion or Synthetic Agenda?

Evidence of mask fibers

is popping up all over the net, as video after video is showing incontrovertible proof that strange new worm-like fibers, black strands and string-like objects are embedded within the cotton masks made en masse for the COVID scamdemic. Independent researchers from all over the world are buying basic microscopes, putting the masks under the lens and seeing truly shocking sights. There are all sorts of weird thin strands, predominantly black, which appear to move of their volition, scattered throughout the fabric. These mask fibers are very different to the rest of the cotton material. What are they? How did they get there? What is their purpose? This article does not have all the answers – not even close – but serves as an introduction to what is shaping up to be a very important topic for humanity’s future: the COVID-nanotech connection. For the background to this, I suggest reading 2 of my earlier articles Hydrogel Biosensor: Implantable Nanotech to be Used in COVID Vaccines? and Operation Coronavirus is Working Hand-in-Hand with the Nanotech Agenda, as well as looking at the research of Celeste Solum.

Standard Face Masks Are Toxic

Many of the masks being handed out do way more harm than good. It is reported that 85% of these masks come from China, are made in substandard conditions and are laced with toxic chemicals. The article entitled Exclusive: Chemical cocktail found in face masks reported that these kind of masks for COVID contain a chemical cocktail including but not limited to formaldehyde (a known carcinogen), aniline (a known carcinogen), acetaldehyde (a known genotoxin) and many other toxic compounds. The Canadian Government just put out a safety alert that face masks may contain graphene (Solum warned about graphene nanotech months ago), stating that “Health Canada’s preliminary assessment of available research identified that inhaled graphene particles had some potential to cause early lung toxicity in animals. However, the potential for people to inhale graphene particles from face masks and the related health risks are not yet known, and may vary based on mask design.” I have pointed out how masks are dangeroushypoxic and dehumanizing.

However, the discovery of ubiquitous and self-moving mask fibers takes the situation to a whole new level. In the sources below I have listed several videos which show the bizarre discovery, many from (hat tip to Tim). The following images are screenshots from his videos:

mask fibers

mask fibers

mask fibers

mask fibers

mask fibers

mask fibers

How are the Mask Fibers Behaving?

The video evidence thus far shows that these mask fibers react to heat and moisture, since they start to move and become agitated when people breathe on them. The fibers may be magnetic; in this clip, you can see the fiber jump out when in the proximity of a standard metal sewing needle. In this compilation, you can see the fibers of a cotton swab/bud jump out at a pig’s brain as though they were attracted to it. In a different clip, you can also see the fibers (which look like shards under a microscope) detach themselves when brushed against a piece of meat. All this gives much credence to the theory that these mask fibers are actually Morgellons fibers, part of the nanotech invasion of mankind – the Synthetic Agenda.

Some of the Different Theories about the Identity of these Mask Fibers

Some people say the mask fibers are small, stray fabric threads from clothing. But how could they be inanimate clothing threads when they wiggle and move? Why do they appear to be activated by heat and moisture? Who do they appear to be magnetized by metal? Some say they are microscopic worms. Others say they are micelles for drug delivery. Then, there are those who believe they are synthetic Morgellons fibers, which I personally find the most believeable at this stage.

There is another theory that the mask fibers are carbon nanotubes (CNTs). A 2015 scientific study found carbon nanotubes (tiny tubes measured in nanometers) in the lungs of every single person tested. These nanotubes can readily be used as biosensors – tracking you from the inside. The study Anthropogenic Carbon Nanotubes Found in the Airways of Parisian Children analyzed the prevalence of CNTs and concluded:

“Anthropogenic carbon nanotubes were found in all samples, indicating that humans routinely breathe such nanostructures … These nanostructures are similar to those present in dusts and vehicle exhausts collected in Paris, as well as to those previously observed in ambient air in the USA, in spider webs in India, and in ice core. These results suggest that humans are routinely exposed to CNTs …”

Final Thoughts

The video clips and compilations below contain incontrovertible evidence. Watch them. See these alive worm-like fibers for yourself and make up your own mind. Is there a sinister plot to position these fibers right near our mouths and noses, so they enter our lungs and body? Is humanity the planned host for these parasites? Mask-wearing mandates are being forced by governments and corporations alike. All we can do is hypothesize and speculate at this stage as we gather more evidence, while being vigilant and wary. As chilling and unnerving as this notion is, it seems very probable that Operation Coronavirus is indeed a cover for the advancement of the nanotech takeover.


Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at Makia is on Steemit and LBRY.


















From Slovakia Hospital – COVID PCR Tests Found to be Tool for Genocide

I just received very disturbing news from Slovakia, where a hospital lab personnel in Bratislavia conducted a study on the COVID PCR Tests and concluded the test swabs that they jam up your nose all the way to the brain are implanting Darpa Hydrogels in your body.

Darpa is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency – a research and development agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military. Originally known as the Advanced Research Projects Agency, the agency was created on February 7, 1958 by President Dwight D. Eisenhour, USA

From the study “Darpa Hydrogel (reference) is an artificial substance that creates a converter between the electromagnetic signal and living cell, tissue and organ. Converts an electromagnetic signal from a transmitter to a signal which a living cell understands and responds to. (see photo of beetle – Darpa Hydrogel was injected into this nerve structures and was controllable via a radio)”

“Darpa Hydrogel and lithium block and destroy the pineal gland and cause the thinking person to become a controllable biorobot. A hydrogel is a carrier of an active substance, its task is to get the substance into the body at a pre-desired place.”

So, the Darpa Hydrogel is a key component, “these are actually nano-antennas”, to connect to 5G and allow the global elite to literally control people like robot beatles.

They cite their test results that show Darpa Hydorgel is also deadly to human blood cells. When used in conjuction with Lithium, which is highly toxic, can destroy the Pineal Gland. The report further states “From this information it is clear that test sticks are a criminal tool of genocide in the population of Slovakia. This is a worldwide, thoughtful and carefully prepared event.”

Here is a link to full study in PDF format.

This is stuff from the Science Fiction archives happening right now.

Jai Guru Dev


Stop Cancer: Bicarbonate Miracle and Cancer – Part 1

By Dr. Mark Sircus,

Sodium bicarbonate is a surprisingly useful tool for treating and preventing cancer. The basic reason that sodium bicarbonate is such a wonderful cancer treatment is that it directly increases CO2 levels in the body. Cancer tumors respond to increased CO2 in a way that does not favor their continued growth.

Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3) is a natural substance used in the human body to regulate pH. Bicarbonate affects the pH of cells and tissues, balances cell voltage, and helps with oxygenation through increasing CO2 levels in the blood. The use of bicarbonates amounts to a real breakthrough in cancer treatment, and there is no doubt that thousands of lives could be saved every day with its use.

At about three dollars a pound, sodium bicarbonate will outperform chemotherapy and radiation treatments because it targets acidity and low oxygen conditions. Treating cancer with bicarbonates treats the fundamental reasons cancer cells form and get aggressive, so it’s a medically sound therapy that should be denied to no one.

Chemo and radiation create a lot of oxidative stress, acidity, inflammation, and low oxygen conditions; bicarbonates cleans up the mess that these toxic treatments make and is known to make traditional mainstream treatments more effective.

Sodium Bicarbonate - Chemotherapy Mesothelioma Patients

The reason for modern medicine’s inability to stem the tide of cancer deaths starts in medical school and the unwillingness to understand carbon dioxide and pH medicine and why hypoxia (low oxygen conditions) are at the root of cancer. We are touching on the heart of pharmaceutical terrorism. They completely repress knowledge of CO2 and pH medicine because it puts the spotlight on sodium bicarbonate.

Baking soda is one of the biggest threats to the pharmaceutical industry because it’s affordable, accessible, and effective. More than inexpensive, baking soda is impossibly too cheap. Bicarbonate medicine is strong and effective enough to devastate the entire pharmaceutical paradigm, so no wonder the medical establishment is so against its use.

Conquering Cancer – A Course in Naturopathic Oncology by Dr. Sircus – Find Out »

Its full power to reduce suffering and death has to be repressed at all cost. So they crippled doctors, leaving them without any understanding of one of the most basic medicines. Basic science knows and appreciates carbon dioxide. Doctors do not and are threatened against using sodium bicarbonate for treating cancer. On the Internet, which is now famous for fake news, you can see doctors, medical institutions, and plain silly people make derogatory remarks about something they know very little about, baking soda as a cancer medicine.

Absolute Certainty

Before we present the science that sustains all the above assertions, be aware of how firm and certain this all is for cancer patients, as certain as the idea that your breathing keeps you alive. There is no room for a shred of doubt with bicarbonates and what they do.

Imagine the best basketball player up in the air making a slam dunk; the ball is already halfway through the hoop; how much would you bet on him making the score? Not sure what else to say to communicate how certain simple baking soda is in its ability to turn the tide of acidic, low oxygen conditions, thus saving millions of cancer patients’ lives. Baking Soda is good. It is a gift from nature, a gift from God. Our best friend, as the Arm and Hammer Baking Soda Company has been saying since 1925 in a book they put out about the medical uses of this simple substance.

1925 A Friend in Need, Facts Worth Knowing About Arm ...

The Overwhelming Science

The first lesson in our understanding of why sodium bicarbonate is a necessary and possibly the most important medicine for cancer patients comes from Dr. Yandell Henderson. In 1940 he wrote, “Another natural misconception is that oxygen and carbon dioxide are so far antagonistic that a gain of one in the blood necessarily involves a corresponding loss of the other. On the contrary, although each tends to raise the pressure and thus promote the diffusion of the other, the two gases are held and transported in the blood by different means; oxygen is carried by the hemoglobin in the corpuscles, while carbon dioxide is combined with alkali in the plasma. A sample of blood may be high in both gases or low in both gases. Under clinical conditions, low oxygen and low carbon dioxide generally occur together. Therapeutic increase of carbon dioxide, by inhalation of this gas diluted in air, is often an effective means of improving the oxygenation of the blood and tissues.”

I recently got a message from a Russian gentleman who lives not far from me that three years ago, he was diagnosed with myeloma stage 4. He was later diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma with metastasis everywhere, mostly in the bones. He reported that he started drinking sodium bicarbonate one teaspoon three times a day two years ago and is now drinking only one teaspoon in the morning and is feeling great.

The necessary second lesson: “But nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause be. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse,” said Nobel Prize Winner Otto Warburg in a meeting of Nobel Laureates on June 30, 1966. Warburg is considered one of the 20th century’s leading biochemists. He was the sole recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1931. In total, he was nominated for the award 47 times throughout his career.

To not understand how acid and low oxygen conditions influences cancer is not to understand cancer. Over 80 years ago, Warburg showed that cells could always be made cancerous by subjecting them to hypoxia periods. Cancer cells survive by utilizing a process that is advantageous in low oxygen environments. Before we go on, remember that low CO2 brings on low O2 and that sodium bicarbonate gives us instant access to more CO2 and thus more oxygen.

“The Secret of Life is both to feed and nourish the cells and let them flush their waste and toxins,” according to Dr. Alexis Carrell, Nobel Prize recipient in 1912. Warburg said, “If our internal environment was changed from an acidic oxygen-deprived environment to an alkaline environment full of oxygen, viruses, bacteria, and fungus cannot live.”

Related image

Researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have unearthed a previously unknown phenomenon. They found that important regulatory molecules are decreased when deprived of oxygen, which leads to increased cancer progression in vitro and in vivo.

The most important factor in creating proper pH is increasing oxygen because no waste or toxins can leave the body without combining with oxygen. The more alkaline you are, the more oxygen your fluids can hold and keep. Oxygen also buffers/oxidizes metabolic waste acids helping to keep you more alkaline. The quickest way to increase oxygen and pH is through the administration of sodium bicarbonate. That is why bicarbonate has always been a mainstay for emergency room and intensive care medicine. Of course, when we increase oxygen and pH levels, we are simultaneously increasing cellular voltage.

It is really hard for doctors and all health practitioners to realize that Carbon dioxide is, in fact, a more fundamental component of living matter than is oxygen. Carbon dioxide gas makes plants grow. It is a life gas, not a deadly gas. You can treat cancer with it because increased systemic concentrations of pH buffers lead to reduced intratumoral and peritumoral acidosis and, as a result, inhibit the malignant growth of cancer. How do you treat cancer with carbon dioxide? Put plenty of bicarbonates in your drinking water. Take bicarbonate baths, add citric acid (but don’t forget the magnesium)—nebulize bicarbonate into the lungs—under some conditions, administer it intravenously and bathe internal organs in it during surgery.

Little does anyone know that a lack of carbon dioxide is
harmful and even less understand is that carbon dioxide is
as fundamental component of living matter as oxygen is.

If a carbon dioxide deficiency continues for a long time, it can be responsible for most diseases, aging, and cancer. Ancient forms of medicine knew that good breathing habits must be formed for increased vitality and freedom from disease. They knew that poor breathing reduces our energy and opens the door to illness, and now we know that too fast breathing drives down CO2 levels in the blood. Good to know that 70 years ago, the medical norm for breathing was eight breaths a minute and that everyone breaths much faster than that now.

Bicarbonates Treat Cancer

“I bought your book, Sodium Bicarbonate – Rich Man’s Poor Man’s Cancer Treatment, after letting doctors treat my prostate cancer with extensive radiation. Then I developed colon cancer. The doctors wanted to remove almost half of my colon. I said no way. I used the protocol outlined in the bicarbonate book for 21 days, and it completely rid me of my colon cancer. I am certain that I will never have cancer anywhere in my body as I am certain that the sun will come up tomorrow, wrote Greg Goss, whose full story is here.

Thus, bicarbonates should be included in all cancer patients’ protocols. Virtually every cancer patient will benefit from combinations of sodium bicarbonate, potassium bicarbonate, and magnesium bicarbonate because they treat the low oxygen acid conditions universally found in cancer patients.

Sodium bicarbonate shrinks tumors. Bicarbonate inhibitsspontaneous metastases (Robey 2009). ‘Bicarbonate Increases Tumor pH and Inhibits Spontaneous Metastases’ according to medical scientistsNaHCO3 therapy significantly reduced the formation of hepatic metastases inhibiting extravasation and colonization.

“Studies conducted at the University of Bari in Italy demonstrated that a hallmark of all tumors, regardless of their origin or background, is their acidic environment. In fact, tumor progression increased with an acidic pH and hypoxia, or a low oxygen level,” writes Dr. Veronique Desaulniers. The perturbation in pH dynamics rises very early in carcinogenesis and is one of the most common pathophysiological hallmarks of tumors.”

“The results of a study suggest that tumor cells do, indeed, perform niche engineering by creating an acidic environment that is non-toxic to the malignant cells but, through its negative effects on normal cells and tissue, promotes local invasion.”

Our body pH is very important because pH controls the speed of our body’s biochemical reactions. It does this by controlling the speed of enzyme activity and the speed that electricity moves through our body; the higher (more alkaline) the pH of a substance or solution, the more electrical resistance that substance or solution holds. Therefore, electricity travels slower with higher pH. If we say something has an acid pH, we are saying it is hot and fast. Alkaline pH, on the other hand, biochemically speaking, is slow and cool.

Tumor invasion did not occur in regions with normal or near-normal pH. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that cells in the invasive edges expressed the glucose transporter GLUT-1 and the sodium-hydrogen exchanger NHE-1, both of which were associated with peritumoral acidosis. In support of our findings’ functional importance, oral administration of sodium bicarbonate was sufficient to increase peritumoral pH and inhibit tumor growth and local invasion in a preclinical model, supporting the acid-mediated invasion hypothesis.

Increased systemic concentrations of pH buffers lead to reduced intratumoral and peritumoral acidosis. Oral NaHCO3 selectively increased the pH of tumors and reduced spontaneous metastases in mouse models of metastatic breast cancer. NaHCO3 therapy also reduced the rate of lymph node involvement and significantly reduced the appearance of hepatic metastases. Acid pH was shown to increase the release of active cathepsin B, an important matrix remodeling protease.


Twenty-seven thousand people died of cancer today. Tomorrow another 27 thousand cancer patients will die. Each year 10 million perish, and yet doctors and medical organizations cannot tell us why and our politicians and health officials do not seem to care about anything other than COVID deaths. After reading all the science on cancer and tumor and intracellular pH, one has to seriously wonder how many of these thousands would not die if bicarbonates were given to them.

Many doctors have asserted that there would have been virtually no COVID deaths if proper treatments had been administered, so it is not outrageous to think that thousands of lives a day of cancer patients could be saved if sodium bicarbonate was included in all cancer protocols.



35,000 Soldiers Died from the Experimental Anthrax Vaccine – More Than Those Who Died in Combat in Afghanistan and Iraq Combined

Health Impact News

Vaccine Syndrome is a film produced by Oscar nominated filmmaker Scott Miller, and provides exclusive interviews with military personnel who have had experience with the controversial anthrax vaccine.

The film claims that over 35,000 soldiers have died from the anthrax vaccine, according to a “RAC-GWVI Government Report” published in 2008.

Compare that to how many soldiers have died in combat in both Iraq and Afghanistan, which is 6753 at the time of the filming.

The film starts out with a dramatized recreating of Lance Corporal Jared Schwartz, who refused to receive the anthrax vaccine.

He had to face a military tribunal without legal counsel, and read a prepared statement.

That statement can be found online, such as at the website.

The film also mentions how pharmaceutical companies have legal immunity from any injuries or deaths resulting from vaccines, and that the civilian population only has recourse to sue the federal government in a special Vaccine Court.

However, military personnel are prohibited from suing in this court, which is part of the National Vaccine Compensation Program.

Watch the film here, or on our Bitchute Channel.


NYT: Fauci admits to deceiving the public about herd immunity because he wanted more people to get vaccinated

Fauci apparently thinks it’s appropriate to deceive the public for their own good



WHO Changes Definition Of ‘Herd Immunity’, Literally Re-Writing Hundreds Of Years Of Scientific Understanding, Just To Push Vaccines

The World Health Organization has changed the definition of “herd immunity,” eliminating the pre-COVID consensus that it could be achieved by allowing a virus to spread through a population, and insisting that herd immunity comes solely from vaccines.

The change occurred on a section of the WHO’s website entitled ‘Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, antibodies and immunity’.

The WHO’s original definition (archived here) states that herd immunity “happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. This means that even people who haven’t been infected, or in whom an infection hasn’t triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person.”

The original definition fails to identify the pre-COVID consensus on what is meant by “herd immunity,” which is when a population becomes protected against a virus because enough people have been infected with it to create community immunity.

However, the WHO’s updated version is even more extreme, insisting that herd immunity can only be achieved by mass vaccination programs.

WHO Changes the definition of herd immunity

“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached,” states the WHO website, adding, “Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.”

“‘Herd immunity’ exists when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated,” states the website, completely omitting the original meaning of “herd immunity,” which is when a population becomes immune to a virus by being exposed to it.

Complaint To The Hague’s International Criminal Court: WHO Chief Should Be Investigated Over GENOCIDE

By changing the definition of “herd immunity,” the WHO is literally re-writing hundreds of years of scientific understanding as to what the term truly means in an apparent effort to silence any argument that herd immunity would have been a better approach to fighting COVID-19 than lockdowns and social distancing [see what happened in Sweden and Belarus, two countries where hard lockdowns and mask mandates have not been imposed].



American Medical Association Approves Hydroxychloroquine


We warned this would happen and now it has. All year the liberal media has attacked Trump’s handling of the coronavirus, especially his endorsement of hydroxycloroquine as an effective treatment.

Now that Democrats believe the election is all over, their disgusting hypocrisy is reaching new heights!

The American Medical Association has amended their recommendations regarding Hydroxychloroquine, reversing their previous warning that a drug in common use for seven decades was somehow now dangerous. This comes after the 2020 election, of course. If they admitted the truth about HCQ before the election, it would have benefitted President Trump who has been recommending it for months.

The AMA is an organization of political hacks. Those in charge of the recommendation made a decision to disregard clear science showing the efficacy of HCQ as a treatment, prompting most news organizations and Big Tech companies to suppress calls for its widespread use. Real doctors had their opinions quashed. Those who discussed how HCQ could benefit us were often suspended or banned from their platforms. And worst of all, people likely died because the AMA wanted to help get their guy into the White House. According to Len Bilén:

The American Medical Association (AMA), in a surprising move, has officially rescinded a previous statement against the use of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, giving physicians the okay to return to utilizing the medication at their discretion.

Previously, the AMA had issued a statement in March that was highly critical of HCQ in regards to its use as a proposed treatment by some physicians in the early stages of COVID-19. In addition to discouraging doctors from ordering the medication in bulk for “off-label” use – HCQ is typically used to treat diseases such as malaria – they also claimed that there was no proof that it was effective in treating COVID, and that its use could be harmful in some instances.

However, on page 18 of a recent AMA memo, issued on October 30, (resolution 509, page 3) the organization officially reversed its stance on HCQ, stating that its potential for good currently may supersede the threat of any potentially harmful side effects.

So, there we have it. HCQ could not be approved before the election, because President Trump had recommended it. Meanwhile, with an 8o +% reduced risk of having to be admitted to the hospital if administered with Azithromycine and Zinc as soon as testing positive or symptoms occurred, many (70000+) lives could have been saved.

Many in conservative media have been touting HCQ based on the word of actual doctors and scientists who attest to its usefulness as both a treatment and even as a preventative measure. President Trump took the drug as part for prevention and was reported on by many in the media as causing harm. Fox News host Neil Cavuto went so far as to say based on the President’s recommendations, “people will literally die.”

At NOQ Report, we’ve had our stories about COVID-19 and HCQ censored by Big Tech on multiple occasions. We’ve had articles and videos removed from Facebook and YouTube. And we’re not alone. According to The Gateway Pundit:

For months The Gateway Pundit has been reporting factually on the evidence and studies that proved Hydroxychloroquine was effecting in the treatment of COVID-19. Of course, we were hounded by the left and attacked by fake “fact-checkers” labeling our reports as disputed.

Despite its effectiveness the American Medical Association (AMA) back in March, at the height of the pandemic in the US criticized hydroxychloroquine and its use. Dr. Fauci led the jihad against this effective drug.

Mainstream media and Big Tech warned for months that listening to President Trump and taking HCQ would harm this nation. As it turns out, they were the ones causing harm, and many Americans likely died as a result.

Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Ebola.


You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either

By MacKenzie Sigalos,

If you experience severe side effects after getting a Covid vaccine, lawyers tell CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law.

The federal government has granted companies like Pfizer and Moderna immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.

“It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“

You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment.

Congress created a fund specifically to help cover lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses for people who have been irreparably harmed by a “covered countermeasure,” such as a vaccine. But it is difficult to use and rarely pays. Attorneys say it has compensated less than 6% of the claims filed in the last decade.

Immune to lawsuits

In February, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there’s “willful misconduct” by the companyThe protection lasts until 2024.

That means that for the next four years, these companies “cannot be sued for money damages in court” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid.

HHS did not respond to CNBC’s request for an interview.

Dunn thinks a big reason for the unprecedented protection has to do with the expedited timeline.

“When the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” said Dunn.

It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed. … Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.
Rogge Dunn

The quickest vaccine ever developed was for mumps. It took four years and was licensed in 1967. Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine was developed and cleared for emergency use in eight months — a fact that has fueled public mistrust of the coronavirus inoculation in the U.S.

Roughly 4 in 10 Americans say they would “definitely” or “probably” not get vaccinated, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. While this is lower than it was two months ago, it still points to a huge trust gap.

But drugmakers like Pfizer continue to reassure the public no shortcuts were taken. “This is a vaccine that was developed without cutting corners,” CEO Dr. Albert Bourla said in an interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Monday. “This is a vaccine that is getting approved by all authorities in the world. That should say something.”

The legal immunity granted to pharmaceutical companies doesn’t just guard them against lawsuits. Dunn said it helps lower the cost of the immunizations.

“The government doesn’t want people suing the companies making the Covid vaccine. Because then, the manufacturers would probably charge the government a higher price per person per dose,” Dunn explained.

Pfizer and Moderna did not return CNBC’s request for comment on their legal protections.

Is anyone liable?

Remember, vaccine manufacturers aren’t the ones approving their product for mass distribution. That is the job of the FDA.

Which begs the question, can you sue the U.S. government if you have an extraordinarily bad reaction to a vaccine?

Again, the answer is no.

“You can’t sue the FDA for approving or disapproving a drug,” said Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law. “That’s part of its sovereign immunity.”

Sovereign immunity came from the king, explains Dunn, referring to British law before the American Revolution. “You couldn’t sue the king. So, America has sovereign immunity, and even each state has sovereign immunity.”

There are limited exceptions, but Dunn said he doesn’t think they provide a viable legal path to hold the federal government responsible for a Covid vaccine injury.

Bringing workers back to the office in a post-Covid world also carries with it a heightened fear of liability for employers. Lawyers across the country say their corporate clients are reaching out to them to ask whether they can require employees to get immunized.

India Medley, Chief Nurse Officer at Howard University Hospital, receives the Covid-19 vaccine at Howard University Hospital in Washington, DC, on December 15, 2020.
India Medley, Chief Nurse Officer at Howard University Hospital, receives the Covid-19 vaccine at Howard University Hospital in Washington, DC, on December 15, 2020.
Nicholas Kamm | AFP | Getty Images

Dunn’s clients who run businesses serving customers in person or on site are most interested in mandating a Covid vaccine for staff.

“They view it as a selling point,” Dunn said. “It’s particularly important for restaurants, bars, gyms and salons. My clients in that segment of the service industry are looking hard at making it mandatory, as a sales point to their customers.”

While this is in part a public relations tactic, it is legally within an employer’s rights to impose such a requirement.

“Requiring a vaccine is a health and safety work rule, and employers can do that,” said Reiss.

There are a few notable exceptions. If a work force is unionized, the collective bargaining agreement may require negotiating with the union before mandating a vaccine.

Anti-discrimination laws provide some protections as well. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, workers who don’t want to be vaccinated for medical reasons are eligible to request an exemption. If taking the vaccine is a violation of a “sincerely held” religious belief, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 would potentially provide a way to opt out.

Should none of these exemptions apply, employees may have some legal recourse if they suffer debilitating side effects following a work-mandated Covid inoculation.

Attorneys say claims would most likely be routed through worker’s compensation programs and treated as an on-the-job injury.

“But there are significant limits or caps on the damages an employee can recover,” said Dunn. He added that it would likely be difficult to prove.

Mandatory vaccination protocols, however, may not happen until the FDA formally approves the vaccines and grants Pfizer and BioNTech or Moderna a license to sell them, which will take several more months of data to show their safety and effectiveness.

“An emergency use authorization is not a license,” said Reiss. “There’s a legal question as to whether you can mandate an emergency observation. The language in the act is somewhat unclear on that.”

$50,000 a year

The government has created a way for people to recover some damages should something go wrong following immunization.

In addition to the legal immunity, the PREP Act established the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which provides benefits to eligible individuals who suffer serious injury from one of the protected companies.

The little-known government program has been around for a decade, and it is managed by an agency under HHS. This fund typically only deals with vaccines you probably would never get, like the H1N1 and anthrax vaccines.

If a case for compensation through the CICP is successful, the program provides up to $50,000 per year in unreimbursed lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses. It won’t cover legal fees or anything to compensate for pain and suffering.

It is also capped at the death benefit of $370,376, which is the most a surviving family member receives in the event that a Covid vaccine proves to be fatal.

But experts specializing in vaccine law say it is difficult to navigate. “This government compensation program is very hard to use,” said Reiss. “The bar for compensation is very high.”

Also worrisome to some vaccine injury lawyers is the fact that the CICP has rejected a majority of the compensation requests made since the program began 10 years ago. Of the 499 claims filedthe CICP has compensated only 29 claims, totaling more than $6 million.

People who are harmed by a Covid vaccine deserve to be compensated fast and generously. The PREP Act doesn’t do that.
Dorit Reiss

David Carney, vice president of the Vaccine Bar Association, said the CICP might deny a claim for a variety of reasons. “One reason might be that the medical records don’t support a claim,” said Carney, who regularly deals with vaccine injury cases. “We have to litigate a lot of really complex issues … and provide a medical basis for why the injury occurred.”

Proving an injury was a direct result of the Covid vaccine could be difficult, according to Carney. “It’s not as simple as saying. ‘Hey, I got a Covid treatment, and now I have an injury.’ There is a lot of burden of proof there.”

There is also a strict one-year statute, meaning that all claims have to be filed within 12 months of receiving the vaccine.

“People who are harmed by a Covid vaccine deserve to be compensated fast and generously,” said Reiss. “The PREP Act doesn’t do that.”

Lawyers tell CNBC that it would make more sense for Covid vaccine injuries to instead be routed through another program under the HHS called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which handles claims for 16 routine vaccines. Known colloquially as “vaccine court,” the program paid on about 70% of petitions adjudicated by the court from 2006 to 2018.

And since it began considering claims in 1988, the VICP has paid approximately $4.4 billion in total compensation. That dwarfs the CICP’s roughly $6 million in paid benefits over the life of the program.

The VICP also gives you more time to file your claim. You have three years from the date of the first symptom to file for compensation.

“The VICP allows for recovery of pain and suffering, attorney’s fees, along with medical expenses and lost wages, if any,” said Michael Maxwell, a lawyer who practices in the areas of business litigation and personal injury. “Under the CICP, it’s only lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses. That’s it, unless there’s a death.”

The Covid-19 vaccines, however, aren’t on the list of eligible vaccines.

Reiss said the best fix would be to change VICP’s rulebook to add Covid vaccines to its list of covered inoculations. “That will require legislative change. I hope that legislative change happens.”



Coca Cola Tests COVID-19 Positive In Austrian Parliament

An Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the government’s COVID-19 tests by demonstrating in the parliament how a glass of Coca Cola tested positive for COVID-19.

In footage from the meeting in Vienna Friday, FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz brings a glass of Coca Cola to the podium, from which he proceeds to collect drops to use on an antigen rapid test being used on a mass scale.

After going to the lectern and starting his speech, the politician sprinkled few drops of cola on corona rapid test. Three minutes later the test showed a result: Coca Cola was COVID-19 positive.

Mr. President, we are likely to have a problem now, we have a positive corona test in parliament, namely this cola triggered a positive corona test. I don’t know how to deal with it now!

With things like this you are throwing tens of millions of euros in tax money out of the window instead of providing real protection for old people’s and nursing homes, instead of investing money in our hospitals.

The corona mass tests are worthless! This was also shown by a simple experiment in parliament, in which a cola had a positive result! But this black-green government spends tens of millions in tax money on precisely these tests.”

Earlier, the Tanzanian President John Magufuli growing suspicious of the World Health Organization (WHO), decided to investigate the claims of the tests himself. He sent the WHO samples of a goat, a papaya and a quail for testing, all of which came COVID-19 positive.