UK Column News – Does the COVID-19 Vaccine create Immune Suppression?

UK Column News covers information about the statistics indicating that the COVID-19 suppresses the immune system. A whistleblower is interviewed and facts are discussed that show a major increase in elderly deaths after seniors, particularly nursing home residents, received the vaccine. The overall death rate from COVID -19 in the elderly prior to vaccine rollout compared to after the vaccine delivery is significantly higher. Discussion ensues with evidence indicating that the media seem to be trying to spin the narrative in order to deliver a scare in months to come that there is a different strain causing the deaths. All of these circumstances with regards to the safety of the vaccines has been predicted way ahead of time by some well know scientists including molecular biologists (Dr. Judy Mikovits) and bio-medical doctor (Dr. Dolores Cahill). And now, we see clearly that what they had been warning us about is happening. Time will tell if the government and corporate institutions will use the vaccine deaths to create the illusion of a  second wave of COVID-19.  Other information in this newscast includes lockdown feedback, information about the safety of the COVID swab tests and more.

The website page with the video and a long list of backup sources.

http://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-1st-february-2021

 

Just in case the Youtube video above is censored which it probably will be, please view on Bitchute below:

 

Robert Hodkinson on the COVID Situation

Dr Hodkinson is a board certified pathologist in the USA and Canada. He studied at Cambridge University in the UK before emigrating to Canada in 1970. He has held a number of leadership positions in his profession both in his own province of Alberta and nationally. His career has spanned general practice, community hospitals, academia, CEO of a large retail clinical laboratory and various other entrepreneurial activities in private medicine.

Dr Hodkinson has a particular interest in molecular diagnostics – the science of identifying DNA for various cutting edge applications in real world medicine.

He has spent 20+ years in the trenches of public health as an activist tackling head-on the biggest public health crisis of our time before the Covid epidemic, namely the predatory marketing of tobacco and governments reluctance to control it, and for which he was made Citizen of the Year in 1994.

 

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful”

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful”

Important legal decision faces total media blackout in Western worldAn appeals court in Portugal has ruled that the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful.

An appeals court in Portugal has ruled that the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful.

Further, the ruling suggested that any forced quarantine applied to healthy people could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty.

Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.

The specifics of the case concern four tourists entering the country from Germany – all of whom are anonymous in the transcript of the case – who were quarantined by the regional health authority. Of the four, only one had tested positive for the virus, whilst the other three were deemed simply of “high infection risk” based on proximity to the positive individual. All four had, in the previous 72 hours, tested negative for the virus before departing from Germany.

In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.

The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.

You can read the complete ruling in the original Portuguese here, and translated into English here. There’s also a good write up on it on Great Game India, plus a Portuguese professor sent a long email about the case to Lockdown Sceptics.

*

The media reaction to this case has been entirely predictable – they have not mentioned it. At all. Anywhere. Ever.

The ruling was published on November 11th, and has been referenced by many alt-news sites since…but the mainstream outlets are maintaining a complete blackout on it.

The reddit Covid19 board actually removed the post, because it was “not a reliable source”, despite relying on the official court documents:

Lookout for a forced and disingenuous “fact-check” on this issue from HealthFeedback or some other “non-partisan” outlet in the near future. But until they find some poor shlub to lend their name to it, the media blackout will continue.

Whatever they say, this is a victory for common sense over authoritarianism and hysteria.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/20/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-tests-unreliable-quarantines-unlawful/