Hollywood VAX BRAINWASH: No more movies made until every actor, director, and producer gets the clot shots in the name of “humanity's better nature”

Image: Hollywood VAX BRAINWASH: No more movies made until every actor, director, and producer gets the clot shots in the name of “humanity’s better nature”

(Natural News) “Vaccine dodgers” will pay the price for their medical choice, according to the Hollywood elitists, and there will be no movies made at all for an entire month, should the “total Hollywood strike” succeed. Rosie O’Donnell, Jennifer Aniston, Gwyneth Paltrow, Sean Penn, and many other liberal vaccine fanatics are ready to stop making movies on behalf of “humanity’s better nature” and because they think they are the “base of the entire modern American culture.” Unless every American succumbs to the deadliest virus-mimicking injections ever created, the brainwashed elites of Holly-Pharma-Wood will stop making movies, and those who support actual science and know that the Fauci Flu jabs are causing heart attacks will have nothing to watch on TV anymore.

Total Hollywood strike a new threat to all who don’t want their entire vascular system clogged with spike protein prions

“It’s about time people understood that we’re the ones with the power and that our audiences are there to serve us, not the other way around,” say the movie stars and their vocalized minions. That’s right, no jab, no movies! The lib-tards of pharma-scripted Hollywood are about to go on a 30-day strike to get the whole country stabbed with spike protein prions that cause myocarditis, pericarditis, turbo cancer, and rubbery vascular clots that lead to sudden adult death syndrome.

“We’re calling for a general strike that would include every single person involved in making motion pictures in Hollywood, starting with the actors and celebrities themselves and encompassing companies in charge of making props, movie memorabilia and even souvenir shops,” say the biggest pharma shills of Tinseltown. All work will come to a grinding halt in La-La-Land because 20 percent of Americans (“vaccine dodgers”) refuse to commit suicide by gene therapy injection.


The Hollywood stars are vaccine freaks and fanatics, demanding for a “massive resistance” movement that forces every human to get injected with prions that cause disease and disorder, claiming…”Our anger must now become massive resistance – before anti-vaxxers become emboldened and failing to do your duty to humanity becomes normalized.”

Meanwhile, even Hollywood stars are dropping dead after the clot shots and clutching their chests in agony, wondering why their hearts all of the sudden aren’t working properly. So, if you want to live a life where there are still movies on your idiot box and in theatres, then you better roll up your sleeve and get the Bill Gates gene-mutating scamdemic jab. After all, Jennifer Aniston is saying she will never speak to her friends (no pun intended) again unless they get the deadly Wuhan virus clot shots.

Hollywood has-beens all threatening the world of unvaccinated folks with no more movies until they succumb to the Kevorkian jabs

Jennifer Aniston is absolutely terrified that someone who is unvaccinated for Covid will give her a severely weakened form of the virus, even though she’s been fully jabbed, and although she “may get slightly sick,” she will then pass the variant along to someone who is already dying of obesity, cancer, heart disease, or dementia, and they will certainly wind up six feet under because of it. Aniston is pushing the jab propaganda as hard as she can on social media (fake news), adding “THAT is why I worry. We have to care about more than just ourselves,” before posting a photo of embroidery that says, “What doesn’t kill you mutates and tries again.”

Maybe she is the one mutating into a jabbed mutant that believes the clot shots are saving her from certain death, when they’re probably leading her straight off a health cliff. Just wait until the “boosters” take full effect. According to KISS singer Gene Simmons, every un-jabbed American should be held down at gunpoint and injected with toxic prions, because these people are his “enemy” and are all “delusional.” Brad “Pitiful” Pitt, Matthew McConaughey, and Gwyneth Paltrow couldn’t resist jumping on the pro-jab bandwagon, promoting the Pfizer and Moderna prion needles.

Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections that the pharma-brainwashed Hollywood stars think everyone needs to flatten the curve.

Sources for this article include:





Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla made “misleading” statements about covid jabs for children

Image: Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla made “misleading” statements about covid jabs for children

(Natural News) A British watchdog group says that Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is guilty of making “misleading” and unsubstantiated statements about covid “vaccines” for children.

During a BBC interview that was published on Dec. 2, 2021, Bourla told the media outlet that children as young as five should take covid injections for protection against the disease, even though the United Kingdom medicine’s regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), did not approve the product for this age group until weeks later.

“I believe it’s a very good idea,” Bourla stated about five-to-11-year-olds taking his company’s injections. (Related: Bourla believes that anyone who objects to his company’s covid jabs is a “criminal” guilty of spreading “disinformation.”)

Citing education disruptions and the potential for children to develop so-called “long” covid, Bourla told the BBC that “there is no doubt in my mind about the benefits completely are in favor of doing it.”

UK regulatory declare Bourla’s statements to be of a “strong unqualified nature”

The children’s welfare group UsForThem filed complaints about Bourla’s statements that led to a panel from the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) ruling that Bourla was out of line and had violated a number of rules in the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI).

Pfizer appealed this ruling, resulting in an appeal board upholding five counts of breaches and three ABPI codes that require information and claims about drug products to be accurate, balanced, capable of substantiation, not raising unfounded hopes of successful treatment, and not being misleading as to the safety of the product – all things that Bourla did by making misleading statements.


According to the PMCPA, everything Bourla said to the BBC during the interview was of a “strong unqualified nature.” In essence, all he was doing was promoting his company’s products, at the expense of children, to pad his own filthy pockets.

The PMCPA later said it received an undertaking from Pfizer to prevent similar breaches in the future.

Ultimately, the appeal board overturned the initial ruling that Bourla had breached the code by promoting the Pfizer-BioNTech injection for the 5-11 age group at a time when it had not yet been authorized by the MHRA. It also overturned previous rulings about Pfizer failing to maintain high standards, which brough discredit upon the drug industry.

“We are pleased the UK’s PMCPA Appeal Board found Pfizer to have maintained high standards and upheld confidence in our industry, the two most serious rulings in this complaint from a UK campaign group,” reads a statement of celebration from Pfizer after getting its way.

“In the UK, we have always endeavoured to follow the principles and letter of our industry Code of Practice throughout. We will review the case report in detail when we receive it, to inform future activity.”

Ben Kingsley, head of legal affairs at UsForThem, also celebrated the fact that UK regulators did admit that Bourla made misleading and unsubstantiated statements, even after the pharmaceutical giant opposed these claims “with all of the resources at its disposal.”

“I think to the average member of the public, we’d regard misleading us about the safety of their product to be plenty more serious than bringing the repute of the pharmaceutical industry down,” Kingsley said in a statement, adding that he “found it quite surprising” that Pfizer’s “most serious” objection was against claims that Bourla’s actions had damaged confidence in the pharmaceutical industry.

“So I think it tells you something about the mindset and the priorities of pharma executives that they regard the abuse of the industry as being a more serious matter than misleading the public.”

More of the latest news about deadly and ineffective covid jabs can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:



The FDA works for Pfizer, helps fast track their drug approvals in an anti-competitive way

Image: The FDA works for Pfizer, helps fast track their drug approvals in an anti-competitive way

(Natural News) The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proven time and time again that they are incapable of properly regulating the pharmaceutical industry. In the latest Pfizer drug approval, the FDA proved that they work for Pfizer and helped fast track a drug approvals in an anti-competitive way.

FDA regulators recently reached out to Pfizer, urging them to apply for a new drug indication for their blockbuster cancer drug Ibrance. With this move, FDA regulators show that they will go out of their way to track down their friends at Pfizer and give them priority for new label expansions. After Pfizer was given the inside track, they quickly applied for the label expansion, monopolizing on cancer treatment fraud through their connections at the FDA.

The FDA tips off Pfizer for label expansions, drug approvals

This year, Pfizer reported that the FDA expanded a full approval for Ibrance. The new approval is for a combination of Ibrance and an aromatase inhibitor that can now be prescribed to newly-diagnosed HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients, regardless of their menopausal status. The combination drug was previously approved only for postmenopausal women.

A careful examination of the prescription information for Ibrance shows no new efficacy data in the patient population. In fact, there is no update on clinical efficacy for Ibrance’s label. The label only includes the original results from the phase 4 PALOMA-2 trial and the phase 3 PALOMA-3 study. The first study only tested a combination of Ibrance and Novartis aromatase inhibitor Femara in postmenopausal women who were newly diagnosed with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. The PALOMA-2 trial failed to produce any convincing data for Ibrance’s efficacy. In fact, Ibrance failed to significantly improve the life expectancy of patients enrolled in the study.


The second study combined Ibrance with AstraZeneca’s SERD drug Faslodex for patients who were previously treated, regardless of menopausal status. Pfizer did not produce any new clinical data, yet the FDA went out of their way to help Pfizer expand their Ibrance label so that it can be prescribed to all women who meet the diagnostic criteria. The FDA’s latest approval letter (dated Dec. 13, 2022) openly admitted that the FDA reached out to Pfizer in December 2021 and requested they file an application to include pre/perimenopausal women in Ibrance’s label. Pfizer submitted the application for expanded market authorization for Ibrance on March 11, 2022, already knowing that the FDA would approve it, because the FDA requested it in the first place.

Pfizer’s regulatory capture of the FDA allows for historic crimes against humanity

Other drug companies are unable to compete with Pfizer because the FDA communicates directly with Pfizer and provides an inside track for their drug approvals. Novartis’s competing drug Kisqali and Eli Lilly’s drug Verzenio were not given the same special treatment for license approval and expansion. The FDA’s favoritism of Pfizer has nothing to do with science or data, and has everything to do with the revolving door they have with the government.

How else would Pfizer continue to get away with their crimes against humanity in regard to the covid-19 vaccine? Pfizer was the first pharmaceutical company to get FDA authorization for the covid mRNA jab because there is a revolving door of fraud between Pfizer and the government. For instance, in June of 2019, Dr. Scott Gottlieb joined Pfizer’s Board of Directors, which was two months after he finished his term as Commissioner of the FDA. One year later, Pfizer received over $2 billion from Operation Warp Speed to expedite mRNA experiments on the population. Now, the FDA is making way for endless approval of Pfizer’s “directed evolution” experiments and yearly covid jab boosters, despite there being no evidence of efficacy or safety for the jabs.

After forcefully and criminally generating $100.3 billion in revenue in 2022 and $81.3 billion in 2021, this criminal organization [Pfizer] continues to grant itself more power over the population and the rule of law through the regulatory façade, the fully-captured FDA.

Sources include:


AccessData.FDA.gov [PDF]




CDC surveillance program allows government to track unvaccinated people when they see their doctors, go to the hospital

Image: CDC surveillance program allows government to track unvaccinated people when they see their doctors, go to the hospital

(Natural News) Exclusive video footage and bombshell federal government records show that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is now actively tracking people who just said no to covid “vaccination.”

Whenever an unvaccinated patient goes to a doctor or hospital, a new CDC program keeps track of his or her every move. This was revealed during a Sept. 14-15, 2021, virtual Zoom meeting of the federal government’s ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee, which includes representatives from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics.

During that meeting, the committee discussed the implementation of new categories of ICD-10 codes to mark people as “Unvaccinated for COVID-19,” “Partially Vaccinated for COVID-19,” and “Other underimmunization status” – watch the video below:

CDC Plot To Track The Unvaccinated Revealed At September 2021 ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting pic.twitter.com/0E5AaCmDAm

— National File (@NationalFile) February 1, 2023

First created by the World Health Organization (WHO), the ICD-10 coding system is used by doctors every day to categorize different types of patients. These codes are routinely used by health insurance companies for billing purposes, and are maintained by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics.

Within ICD-10 codes are ICD-10CM codes, which are reportedly now being used by the CDC for tracking purposes. The “CM,” in this context, specifically designates people who are partially or entirely unvaccinated for covid. (Related: Remember when the CDC’s smartphone app was found to contain hidden Russian software disguised as part of the app?)


If you’re unvaccinated, the government probably knows about it

It was made very clear during that Zoom meeting call that the new codes are needed specifically to “track” unvaccinated people. Even people who had previously been jabbed with some covid injections but suffered side effects and stopped are to be tracked within the program.

According to a document published on the CMS federal government website, the new tracking codes for the unvaccinated and the partially vaccinated started being used in April 2022.

ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee staffer Dr. David Berglund, MD, read from page 194 of a CDC Topic Packet the following information pertaining to this – you can hear him speak in the above video:

“During the current time of the COVID-19 pandemic, immunizations have provided protection for many people, but there is interest in being able to track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized. At the current time, this is a significant modifiable risk factor for morbidity and mortality, and of interest for clinical reasons, as well as of value for public health. NCHS is proposing creation of codes for unvaccinated for COVID-19, and for partially vaccinated for COVID-19.”

NCHS, in this context, refers to the National Center for Health Statistics, a federal government division of the CDC.

An NIH government website further states about ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes that they “tell the story of each patient encounter, describe etiologies of the disease process, explain the complications of care, provide a basis for medical necessity, support coverage for payment purposes, identify incidence of disease, and support statistical tracking for healthcare practices, as well as provide disease state information on medical practices across the continuum of care.”

“The lesson here is this: stay far, far away from all doctors and hospitals,” suggested someone on Twitter about how to avoid being tracked by the government like this.

“These people are criminals and should be prosecuted for this tracking of unvaccinated people,” suggested another. “I am so angry now, even more so than when my doctor’s nurse asked me if I was vaccinated. I suspected this was going to happen and I told her she had no right to ask me about that.”

The latest news about the CDC can be found at CDC.news.

Sources for this article include:




DC has nowhere to hide the revelations about Ukrainian biolabs and their link to “pandemic research”

Image: DC has nowhere to hide the revelations about Ukrainian biolabs and their link to “pandemic research”

(Natural News) Now that there is no more denying the existence of United States-run bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine, the latest story from the White House is that these facilities only exist to conduct “some pandemic prevention research.”

This is according to National Security Council Strategic Communications Coordinator John Kirby, who now admits that Ukraine’s biolabs are real. He also claims, though, that they were “safely deactivated” prior to the launch of Russia’s special military operation.

Kirby’s statements came after the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) released a new batch of information about the Pentagon’s biological programs in Ukraine. This information was obtained during the course of Moscow’s ongoing special military operation, which was first launched on Feb. 24, 2022.

“Russia’s Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defense (RCB) Troops revealed on Monday that in 2022 the US evacuated Ukrainian specialists working on bioweapons to western countries, including the US, Canada and throughout the European Union,” Sputnik News reported.

“The relocation was undertaken in part to prevent Russia from obtaining more information about activities by Ukrainian and U.S. specialists that may be in contravention of international obligations and treaty norms. RCB troops began exposing the extent of the U.S. bioweapons program in Ukraine last spring.”

(Related: Further evidence shows that Ukraine was planning to use its biolabs to attack Russia.)

Nobody is buying the U.S. deep state’s propaganda concerning the Ukrainian biolabs

According to Kirby, the Ukrainian biolabs aren’t “bioweapons” labs. He insists that “no bioweapons work” is being done “by or with the United States with Ukraine in Ukraine.”


At the same time, however, Kirby admits that these facilities do exist and that they had to be deactivated before the Russian invasion. Why was there a need to do this at all if the facilities are supposedly bioweapons-free?

“If such a program was purely peaceful, then why were the works so promptly curtailed?” is how Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov asked that question. “Why are these issues handled by the military, but not the civilian specialists?”

In Antonov’s view, the reason why Ukraine’s biolabs were “safely deactivated” prior to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s special operation is because Washington, D.C., did not want the results of whatever research was taking place inside of them to fall into the hands of the Russian military.

You may recall from last March when D.C. was still denying the existence of any biolabs in Ukraine statements made by Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland, who testified before a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Ukraine. She was the first to admit that “Ukraine has biological research facilities” – these were her exact words.

“We are now in fact quite concerned that Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to, uh, gain control of [those labs], so we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach,” Nuland admitted at the time.

Just prior to this, Robert Pope, head of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program at the Pentagon, claimed that some Ukrainian biolabs could still be holding pathogen strains left over in freezers from the Soviet bioweapons program.

A report published on June 18, 2010, was also unearthed out of Great Britain admitting that a level-3 biosafety lab was built by the U.S. in the Ukrainian city of Odessa to study dangerous pathogens like anthrax, tularemia, Q fever, and others “used by bioterrorists.”

Be sure to check out the full report from Sputnik News to learn more about these revelations.

More related news coverage can be found at WWIII.news.

Sources for this article include:



The entire transgender industry sits on a foundation of just two faulty studies

Image: The entire transgender industry sits on a foundation of just two faulty studies

(Natural News) Experts from the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEBGM) have debunked two landmark studies that in many ways underpin the entire transgender industry.

A report from SEBGM entitled “The Myth of ‘Reliable Research’ in Pediatric Gender Medicine” explains how the two Dutch studies, one published in 2011 and other in 2014, never should have been accepted by the professional community as valid because their methodology falls “unacceptably” short of modern research standards.

Despite containing bad research that is false, the two studies were used to launch a global movement in support of “gender-affirming care,” which is more accurately described as transgender mutilation via pharmaceutical drugs and invasive surgeries.

Youth everywhere are now experimenting with gender-benders like puberty blockers and cutting off their genitalia based on these two studies, which are the epitome of pseudoscience. (Related: The transgender mafia is now demanding reparations as if they were slaves.)

One of the problems with the studies is that they failed, respectively, to properly examine the risks involved with altering one’s endocrine system and modifying body parts with drugs and surgical equipment.

“The entire pediatric transgender industry is based on these two Dutch studies,” said Michelle Cretella, the most recent past executive director of the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) and an advisory board spokeswoman for Advocates Protecting Children.

“This open access report is critical because it exposes the fraudulent foundation of pediatric transgender medicine in the United States.”


Most transgenders end up regretting their decision later in life because cutting off body parts and altering hormones cannot fix their mental illness

It turns out that the two Dutch studies in question, had they been published today, probably would have been disregarded by the entire scientific community as very-low-quality research unworthy of serious consideration – which means thousands of children’s lives could have been saved.

The ACPeds responded to the new report about these flawed studies by issuing a press release on January 25 calling for all relevant organizations to “reconsider current protocols for gender dysphoric children.”

The Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy published the new report, which was co-authored by Stephen B. Levine, an expert psychiatrist who has been working in his field since 1974.

Last March, Levine and his colleagues published another report called “Reconsidering Informed Consent for Trans-Identified Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults” to which their latest report is a follow-up.

“We had no bias,” Levine is quoted as saying about the research. “We are just responding to and trying to articulate the limitations of the studies.”

“We are doing harm to an unknown percentage of kids, and the data that is supportive of this work does not really address the issue. The real issue here is what happens to these children when they get into their 20s and 30s.”

Once a person “transitions” and loses body parts and hormones, it is a long road of misery that ensues. This is something that young people being groomed into transgenderism are rarely, if ever, warned about before pulling the trigger.

“After people have sex reassignment surgeries … they want more surgeries,” Levine warns. “It’s very clear they have continued gender dysphoria. The idea that they are being ‘cured’ by affirmative care is an artifact, it’s a myth.”

There is still zero evidence that gender dysphoria has any basis in genetics, which means this is not a medical problem but rather a mental health problem.

“Just because we have hormone treatment doesn’t mean there is a hormonal defect in the person,” Levine says. “People believe, erroneously, that there is some genetic, pre-determined factor here, but we have not been able to find a genetic cause.”

The latest news about transgender deviancy and perversion can be found at Transhumanism.news.

Sources for this article include: