Near Oraibi, Arizona, there is a petroglyph known as Prophecy Rock which symbolizes many Hopi prophecies. Its interpretation is:
The large human figure on the left is the Great Spirit. The bow in his left hand represents his instructions to the Hopi to lay down their weapons. The vertical line to the right of the Great Spirit is a time scale in thousands of years. The point at which the great Spirit touches the line is the time of his return.
The “life path” established by the Great Spirit divides into the lower, narrow path of continuous Life in harmony with nature and the wide upper road of white man’s scientific achievements. The bar between the paths, above the cross, is the coming of white men; the Cross is that of Christianity. The circle below the cross represents the continuous Path of Life.
The four small human figures on the upper road represent, on one level, the past three worlds and the present; on another level, the figures indicate that some of the Hopi will travel the white man’s path, having been seduced by its glamour.
The two circles on the lower Path of Life are the “great shaking of the earth” (World Wars One and Two).
The swastika in the sun and the Celtic cross represent the two helpers of Pahana, the True White Brother.
The short line that returns to the straight Path of Life is the last chance for people to turn back to nature before the upper road disintegrates and dissipates. The small circle above the Path of Life, after the last chance, is the Great Purification, after which corn will grow in abundance again when the Great Spirit returns. And the Path of Life continues forever…
The Hopi shield in the lower right corner symbolizes the Earth and the Four-Corners area where the Hopi have been reserved. The arms of the cross also represent the four directions in which they migrated according to the instructions of the Great Spirit.
The dots represent the four colors of Hopi corn, and the four racial colors of humanity.
Up until now, the Hopi Prophecy Rock’s interpretation regarding the division of the “life path” into the upper road of the White man’s pursuit of scientific achievements, has not been completely understood because it was not made clear that this development would occur on a different planet although it should have been understood since the upper path “disintegrates and dissipates” while the other path continues and thrives. Seldom do people ask, ”How can one society “disintegrate and dissipate” right next to or interspersed within, another society that continues and prospers?
But Enoch also prophesied about this exact same time, yet he provides greater details that few are familiar with. He specifically states that the wicked shall be removed from this planet.
Therefore, the upper road does not take place on this planet.
Here it must be said that good people who identify as “White” must separate themselves from the Elite and Whites with superiority complexes. This is not about skin color but frequency in the hearts and minds. Good White people must not allow themselves to be lumped into the same category with these people. The tendency to identify by color must end. Superiority complexes do not help anyone. Those who think they benefit are unaware of the trap they create in their consciousness that prevents them from Ascending and causes them to spend lifetimes trying to unravel the negative impact this complex creates on the consciousness.
Superiority complexes demand the suffering of others so that those who feel superior can feel better about themselves in comparison to whatever suffering exists in others. But this way of thinking was deeply programmed in those who hold this view. However, that experiment is over.
The last thing the Elites wanted was to have our consciousness seeded with the scenes of their destruction so they took the Book of Enoch out of the Bible because of the detailed account of the shutdown of this reality which they mocked in their Hollywood Movie X-Men: The Apocalypse.
Enoch said the wicked would be removed from this planet. He gave a detailed, behind the scenes look at the operation, including its beginning and it’s end. Those who feel they know a better way to reach their ascension by using science and technology will be allowed to do so on another planet, perhaps Mars, only if;
1) they lay down their arms,
2) assist with the shutdown of the current reality, and,
3) exit the planet voluntarily.
But they refused. Now they will be extracted by force. The force doing the work will confuse many because it is comprised of some ET responsible for creating this mess as well as the Benevolent ET who will be taking over during the Golden Age of Peace.
This mindset cannot remain on the planet during the Golden Age of Peace. The earth is entering a new Epoch and as with all changeovers of this particular nature, the controlling group of ETs changes. It has always been so. This is why the ET creators of this reality are working to extract their creation so that they can continue on a different planet. They made this mess and must clean it up if they want to continue on another planet. Only through the Son of Man can they safely reach their destination and goal, otherwise they face absolute destruction.
In fact, the frequencies on earth are about to reach a level where those who are not specific to that frequency will experience horrific physical damage and death. It has already started but will now pick up in speed. Spontaneous combustion will become much more commonplace in those filled with toxic thoughts and emotions. And no amount of underground area will shield them as the entire planet will be penetrated to its core. The Earth will no longer wait for humans to proceed with her own Ascension into a higher dimension.
They should thank their lucky stars if they should be so fortunate to get pinched and locked up for treason with a guaranteed ticket to Mars because what awaits them here on this planet is more horrific than any of their Hollywood movies could ever convey. Alfred Webre is mistaken about Trump being AI entrained to rule as president of the world here on earth. The Trump dynasty will rule on Mars (or whatever planet they chose for their next destination), but not on earth. Earth will enter into the Golden Age of Peace.
Before that happens, mental illness among the confused and mindless will soar to new heights. Witness the number of Comics being promoted whose routines are normalization electric shock and pharmaceuticals. Georgi Stankov said most people would “scream for drugs” by the time we reached this point in the Ascension process and he was right.
The best bet of the wicked Cabal is to give up and spill the beans so that they can escape to an atmosphere that will support their continued existence.
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
During our September 18 debate, Spectrum TV host Renee Eng asked Kaiser’s, Dr. Robert Riewerts, how many vaccine injuries he had seen during his 30 years as a Pediatrician. His answer: “None, not a single one.”
Slide 1. A 2010 HHS pilot study by the AHCR.
Slide 1 shows a 2010 U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) to test the efficiency of a state-of-the-art machine counting (AI) system on data records from the Harvard Pilgrim HMO. Those government researchers found that 2.6% of vaccination resulted in injuries—a ratio one for every 39 vaccines administered. The same study found that typical clinicians see 1.3 vaccine injuries per month.
Slide 2. A table from HHS’s 2016 Neiss-Cades survey published in JAMA
Slide 2 is a table from HHS’s 2016 Neiss-Cades survey published in JAMA reporting an astonishing 19.5% of children under five who are admitted to emergency rooms for drug reactions are suffering vaccine injuries. This finding certainly represents an undercount since pediatric hospitals, which treat most serious injuries, were badly underrepresented in the database, (Only six of 63 hospitals surveyed).
How is it then that Dr. Riewerts has given thousands of vaccines and never seen an injury?
Medical schools—largely funded by Pharma, do not teach doctors to recognize vaccine injuries, and indoctrinate pediatricians to believe such injuries don’t exist. CDC tells doctors that vaccine injury is vanishingly rare. Therefore, Pediatricians like Dr. Riewerts whose patients suffer vaccine injury like seizures, epilepsy, allergies, autoimmune and neurological injuries, or SIDS, are likely to dismiss those incidents as “sad coincidences” unrelated to vaccines and never report them to VAERS.
Slide 3. AHCR confirmed these assessments, finding that “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries were reported.
Indeed, HHS commissioned the AHCR pilot study in response to criticism that vaccine injuries were horribly underreported. AHCR confirmed these assessments, finding that “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries were reported.”
Slide 4. CDC terminated the system-wide roll-out and stopped returning phone calls from their sister agency.
Slide 4 shows that CDC officially were so panicked by AHRC’s revelations that they killed the AI system-wide roll-out and stopped returning phone calls from their sister agency. Today, CDC purposefully continues to use a surveillance system designed to under-count vaccine injuries by over 99%!
“The idea is so simple that it’s rather insulting.”
By Elias Marat,
As the fast-heating global climate increasingly becomes a problem, researchers are warning that severe and prolonged droughts could devastate global food supplies by the end of this century.
However, UK-based company Seawater Greenhouse has devised a method of growing fruits and vegetables in some of the world’s most arid desert climates, and its key ingredient is saltwater.
While the idea seems counter to common wisdom—in most circumstances, the salts in seawater cause plants to wilt and humans to dehydrate—saltwater is actually key to irrigating the company’s farms located in some of the most drought-stricken regions of the globe, including such infamously dry locales as Abu Dhabi, Somaliland, Oman, and South Australia.
The technology was developed in the early 1990s when designer-turned-inventor Charlie Paton began testing his method in Spain’s Canary Islands.
Rather than relying on the traditional glass used in greenhouses, these farms use thick walls of latticed cardboard that are dampened by the saltwater, using the evaporated water to keep the interior of the structures humid and cool.
“The idea is so simple that it’s rather insulting.
People say, ‘If that’s going to work then somebody would have done it before’.”
As the moist cardboard panels of the structure cool down the wind blowing outside, a small pump powered by another one of the planet’s most abundant resources—solar power—brings in seawater from the coastline, which trickles down the cardboard walls, humidifying the interior of these novel greenhouses.
The simple yet effective method has allowed for Paton to effectively create a system that bears abundant amounts of produce in the middle of the desert—similar to an oasis.
In the meantime, as seawater is collected and recirculated through the cardboard panels, salt precipitates on the exterior of the walls—not only fortifying the damp cardboard, but also leaving behind sea salt that can then be sold in local markets.
Paton even believes that his invention can change the environment it’s in.
“You can see there would be a plume of cool air coming off the greenhouse,” he explained, noting that the greenhouses could eventually return regions that recently became barren back to their naturally vegetated state. And that, in turn, would absorb carbon emissions. He added:
“I believe that when you get to, say, 20 years, you’d have enough vegetation to do the job of the greenhouses because they’re creating shade and shared humidity–changing the climate.”
Paton believes that only 10 square miles (2,000 hectares) of these cardboard greenhouses would be required to feed Somaliland, where the population is roughly four million people.
However, organizations like the UK’s Department for International Development remain skeptical about the idea of a seawater-fueled greenhouse, and have rejected his multiple attempts to secure funding. Paton believes that there’s more than a bit of self-interest guiding their aversion to his invention.
“Have you heard of the Shirky Principle? It’s that institutions exist to preserve the problem to which they have a solution.
Sending food to starving countries is this knee-jerk reaction. How much have we sent to Somalia and Ethiopia, and what dent has it really made? If some of that humanitarian aid could instead be directed towards encouraging self-sufficiency, everyone would win.”
So much of dystopian science fiction stories feature an all-knowing, all-powerful private corporation as the dominant authority in a tyrannic and soulless world. According to a new study, this vision of the future isn’t all that fictional, as trans-national corporations (TNC’s) are growing at an alarming pace, rapidly consolidating control over major industries, and creating a new type of super-governance in our world.
Conducted by Carl Folke et al. of the University of Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, the 2019 study primarily focused on the influence that multinational corporations have over the biosphere and critical issues surrounding sustainability, but also revealed just how dependent the world is on TNC’s.
For years we’ve known that just a handful of media companies hold sway over 90% of the media we consume, offering up the illusion of choice, but this paradigm extends into other critical sectors.
Citing the trend towards dominance of relatively small number of companies, the study notes:
Consolidation among corporations, whereby a small number of companies control a large market share of the overall output or sales for a particular product or product type (that is, oligopoly or, at the extreme, monopoly), is a well-known and predictable feature of economic development.
Some 10% of the world’s corporations generate 80% of all profits globally.
A handful of transnational companies (TNCs) in the information technology sector control 90% or more of the global market share of search engines, operating systems and social media.
Three investor firms manage over 90% of all assets under management in passive equity funds, and retailers, which form the interface between consumers and global supply chains, also show high levels of concentration.
Such dominance is variously explained by increasing share of returns from growth going to capital rather than labour, the ability of TNCs to navigate regulatory systems opportunistically across multiple jurisdictions, and their capacity to create barriers to entry for smaller firms.
Many people today are beginning to finally understand the damage being done to the environment by TNC’s, and the report focused in on consolidation in agriculture and forestry, seafood, agrochemicals, mining and fossil fuels. We’ve been warning for years of the impact a company like Monsanto can have, but this report shows us the chilling, bigger picture.
As the world wakes up to the new future we are creating, our inter-connectedness and inter-dependency is reaching unreal levels. We human beings are hard-wired to become comfortable with our surroundings, and are easily trained to become dependent. The tyranny of convenience is creating dangerous imbalance in this world, and a handful of so-called super corporations are deftly exploiting these trends and positioning themselves for extreme dominance over the environment and our ability to support ourselves.
False prophets are a lot more present in this world than most people realize. While we are all working to become more awake, we are also beginning to spend more time with those who might not be working to benefit anyone but themselves.
False prophets are spiritual leaders of any and all religions and ‘soulful’ backgrounds who are only working as such to gain things for themselves. They don’t want to achieve things with others or see the people around them grow, they just want to use them to get where they want to be. Their intentions are lacking drastically.
Who we place our trust in is a big deal, and we need to remember this as we move forth in our lives. Those who we choose to allow to guide us, especially in a spiritual manner are people we need to know that we can trust. Evaluating your spiritual teacher is important in figuring out what things are going wrong and whether you’re following someone you shouldn’t be following.
Below I am going to go over some of the signs that indicate someone you’re following or allowing in your life is a false prophet. While not all of these signs might be present if many of them are you need to think things through. Perhaps some changes could go a long way in regards.
1. You feel like pushing the way you’re following on others is acceptable.
There is never any reason to try and force your path on someone else. We all take our time in figuring out where we are headed. If your views or guides are pushing you to force things on other people, you are following the wrong guide.
2. You trust this person more than yourself.
At the end of the day, we should trust our own guts more than our gurus. While these people are guiding us, our soul knows what is best for us. We have to be able to trust our instincts above all else.
3. There are boundaries being broken by this ‘guru.’
If this guru or guide, in general, is doing inappropriate things with his/her followers then that should serve as a red flag. We are meant to help and heal one another not take advantage of those who are struggling. Boundary breaking should never be tolerated.
4. They are very closed off regarding their past.
Spiritual teachers, in general, are very open about their pasts because they know that their struggles can help others grow. If your guide isn’t willing to open up there has to be a reason behind that. For many that reason is not as simple as you might assume and can be quite sinister.
5. He/she does not treat everyone the same and always picks favorites.
If your spiritual teacher is picking favorites and showing more kindness to those who have more to offer him/her that should make things clear. We are all the same and if the money and benefits do not matter then favorites shouldn’t exist. Everyone should be seen on the same level.
6. He/she always has convenient explanations for everything that you question.
When you question your spiritual guide, and he or she comes up with answers that fit perfectly as if they were rehearsed, chances are they were. Regardless of the question, some thought has to go into an answer. If things seem too spot-on, you should keep that in mind.
7. This person has a very deep-seated ego and struggles with letting go.
Gurus are people who have reached a higher spiritual level and thus in most cases have already experienced ego death. If they are still very rooted in their ego, they’re not much of a guru, are they? Don’t overlook this kind of thing.
8. He/she only offers help to those who can offer him/her something in return.
If your teacher is only willing to help those who can benefit him or her in the long-run, you’re following a false prophet. Real truly spiritual people will help all they can with or without gain in the end. They don’t care if they are being rewarded, they like to help.
9. The things he/she does do not align with his/her teachings.
If your teacher is saying one thing but doing another you need to cut ties. As a prophet, your teacher should always follow the words he/she preaches. No one should be considered as above anyone else.
10. This person pushes a narrative that is not possible.
If your guru promises you that you can become awakened in just three weeks by paying him/her a lot of money and going on a retreat, just stop wasting your time. This is just someone who wants to get paid and keep the wool over your head. Awakenings have to happen on their own.
11. Everything this person teaches sounds like it is too good to be true.
If this person is merely running around selling ‘snake oil’ you need to stop being so naive. If it sounds like it is too good to be true, it probably is. You are very smart, do not be deceived.
12. The people in your life have expressed their concerns.
If the people closest to you are concerned for your well-being religious views aside, there has to be a reason behind it. Stop to consider how the things you’re doing or partaking in look from the outside in. Are you being too trusting with the wrong people?
“Moscow and Damascus have always maintained they are against any form of partition or illegal foreign presence in Syria.”
Moscow has managed to maintain contacts with all parties in the conflict, even in spite of its stance against partition and illegal foreign presence. Trilateral talks between Iran, Turkey and Russia occurred in Astana at Moscow’s urging. Putin managed to bring together in Sochi the Syrian government and opposition groups to discuss the future of Syria. In Geneva, Moscow mediated between Damascus and the international community, shielding Syria from the diplomatic skulduggery of the US and other enemies of Syria.
Turkey, solely as a result of its defeat in Syria, now finds itself in active dialogue with Moscow and Tehran. As Ankara experiences worsening relations with Washington and other European capitals, Moscow saw a great opportunity to bring Turkey closer to Damascus.
Russia’s operation was complicated and required a lot of patience; but thanks to negotiations supervised by Russia, together with the bravery and courage of Syrian soldiers, almost all of the terrorist pockets scattered around Syria have been progressively overcome.
Other than the Idlib province, the main problem for Damascus lay with the US occupation in the northeast of the country, under the pretext of protecting the Kurds (SDF) from the “Assad regime”, as well as to “fight Daesh”.
Erdogan currently finds himself boxed in, squeezed in by a collapsing economy, threatened by his allies (the purchase of the Russian S-400 system irritated many in Washington and in NATO): he desperately needs to present some kind of victory to his base.
This may be the primary reason behind Erdogan’s decision to move into Syria under the pretense that the YPG is a terrorist organization linked with the PKK — proceeding to create a buffer zone on the border between Syria and Turkey and declaring “mission accomplished” to boost popularity ratings.
With Trump, he is desperate to shift attention away from the impeachment proceedings (a hoax), and similarly needs to present some kind of victory to his base. Why, what better way to do this than with a mini withdrawal of US troops from Syria, leaving the Kurds to their destiny (Trump’s care factor regarding SDF is minimal, as they are more connected to his political opponents in the Democratic Party), while claiming victory over Daesh for the umpteenth time in recent months?
Trump, with a handful of tweets directed against the Pentagon’s “crazy spending” and America’s past wars, finds himself and his base giving each other high fives on their commitment to the doctrine of “America First”.
Erdogan and Trump have also solved the embarrassing internal conflict within NATO between Turkey and the US, probably reestablishing personal relationships (the tough talk from the White House notwithstanding).
The agreement between the Kurds (SDF) and Damascus is the only natural conclusion to events that are heavily orchestrated by Moscow. The deployment of Syrian and Russian troops on the border with Turkey is the prelude to the reconquest of the entirety of Syrian territory — the outcome the Kremlin was wishing for at the beginning of this diplomatic masterpiece.
Washington and Ankara have never had any opportunities to prevent Damascus from reunifying the country. It was assumed by Moscow that Washington and Ankara would sooner or later seek the correct exit strategy, even as they proclaimed victory to their respective bases in the face of defeat in Syria. This is exactly what Putin and Lavrov came up with over the last few weeks, offering Trump and Erdogan the solution to their Syrian problems.
Trump will state that he has little interest in countries 7,000 miles from the homeland; and Erdogan (with some reluctance) will affirm that the border between Turkey and Syria, when held by the Syrian Arab Army, guarantees security against the Kurds.
Putin has no doubt advised Assad and the Kurds to begin a dialogue in the common interests of Syria. He would have no doubt also convinced Erdogan and Trump of the need to accept these plans.
An agreement that rewards Damascus and Moscow saves the Kurds while leaving Erdogan and Trump with a semblance of dignity in a situation that is difficult to explain to a domestic or international audience.
Moscow has started joint patrols with the Syrian Arab Army on the borders with Turkey for the purposes of preventing any military clashes between Ankara and Damascus. If Ankara halts its military operation in the coming days, Damascus will regain control of the oil fields.
The world will then have witnessed one of the greatest diplomatic masterpieces ever conceived, responsible for bringing closer the end of the seven-year-long Syrian conflict.
“How Bottled Water Became America’s Most Popular Beverage” explains the switch from soft drinks to bottled water — now the leading growth industry for the beverage market. Americans buy over half a billion bottles of water each week when water flows virtually free from the tap! Yet, tap water is often superior and all those plastic bottles are trashing the planet! A few years ago, buying bottled water would have seemed as absurd as buying air! So, what fueled this dramatic shift – and whom does it really benefit?
That shift is much more damaging than it seems. It includes the World Bank’s global plan to privatize water. That hidden agenda also explains one of the primary motives for NATO’s unprovoked attack on Libya in 2011 which destroyed one of Africa’s richest countries. It also destroyed Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s Man-Made River Project which would have provided fresh water for Libya and two other African countries.
Libyans called the project the “eighth wonder of the world”. It was not a military target. Yet, NATO bombed and destroyed it — a war crime under the Geneva Conventions of 1949. That affected Europe as well. The article “Climate-driven migration in Africa” shows that lack of water is driving tens of thousands of African refugees into Europe now. I will go into more detail later about the significance of this project and how it offers context for the wider move toward water privatization.
The state of Michigan has reportedly issued preliminary approval for bottled water behemoth Nestlé to nearly triple the amount of groundwater it will pump, to be bottled and sold at its Ice Mountain plant, which lies roughly 120 miles northwest of the beleaguered community of Flint.
Many residents of Flint are still forced to rely on bottled water for cleaning, cooking and bathing as government delays have hampered efforts to replace the corroded pipes.
Meanwhile, the report notes that company representatives defended the need to expand the facility because “U.S. market for bottled water in general is driving the bid for more Michigan groundwater.”
What’s more, Nestlé, the biggest food company in the world, gets to pump that water at no cost.
At the World Water Forum in 2000, Nestlé successfully lobbied to stop water from being declared a universal right — declaring open hunting season on our local water resources by the multinational corporations looking to control them.
For Nestlé, this means billions of dollars in profits. For us, it means paying up to 2,000 times more for drinking water because it comes from a plastic bottle. Now, in countries around the world, Nestlé is promoting bottled water as a status symbol. As it pumps out fresh water at high volume, water tables lower and local wells become degraded. Safe water becomes a privilege only affordable for the wealthy.
In our story, clean water is a resource that should be available to all. It should be something we look after for the public good, to keep safe for generations, not something we pump out by billions of gallons to fuel short-term private profits. Nestlé thinks our opinion is “extreme”, but we have to make a stand for public resources. Please join us today in telling Nestlé that it’s not “extreme” to treat water like a public right.”
World Bank’s Privatization of Water
The 2014 video World Bank’s Takeover of Water shows that the World Bank wants to privatize water! It includes the head of Nestlé ridiculing the idea that access to water is a right! In 1992, Swiss food conglomerate Nestlé purchased Perrier and began purchasing other bottled water companies. Now, Nestlé, a transnational corporation, is the biggest bottled water company in the world.
Research shows that the tide of water privatisation has now turned. Many cities that rushed to sign 20-year or longer concessions with water companies in expectation of clean water at a socially acceptable cost have chosen to terminate agreements and return urban water provision to public control.
Last month, U.S. Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D. Wisconsin) released a hard-hitting letter condemning the World Bank’s water practices. Representative Moore plays a powerful role on the U.S. congressional committee with oversight of the World Bank and has significant influence over U.S. funding to the World Bank.
Unbottle Water: Americans Fight Water Privatization
Fights around public water are popping up throughout the United States and around the world. Everyday people are working to preserve clean water access in their communities and to secure public water sources, systems, and infrastructure against privatization.
The Story of Stuff Project is a firm believer in safeguarding the commons for public good. Our Unbottle Water campaign supports communities around the United States and Canada. We’re fighting to protect public water resources from the aggressive privatization efforts of companies like Nestlé Waters as they push to secure new sources of water for bottling. We promote efforts to expand water affordability programs, rebuild aging water infrastructure, and counter industry attacks on clean water regulations.
The short film The Story of Water explains how corporations are taking over municipal water supplies across America.
A Tale of Two Cities, a shocking film, tells the story of two communities in Michigan whose futures are linked by a threat to their access to water.
The must-see film The Story of Bottled Water explains how “manufactured demand pushed what we don’t need and destroys what we need most”. The film shows how Americans are seduced into buying more than half a billion bottles of water every week when tap water is almost free. The film explores the bottled water industry’s attacks on tap water and its use of environmental-themed advertising to cover up the mountains of plastic waste it produces. The film calls on viewers to make a personal commitment to avoid bottled water and to support public investment in clean tap water for all. It shows that the tide is beginning to turn now as the sale of bottled water is beginning to drop.
The Great Man-Made River was designed to deliver fresh water to Libya – as well as to Chad and Sudan. It was funded by the Libyan government of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. The largest construction project in history! The project was so well recognized internationally that in 1999, UNESCO accepted Libya’s offer to fund an award named after it, the Great Man-Made River International Water Prize, the purpose of which is to “reward remarkable scientific research work on water usage in arid areas”.
It was Muammar Gaddafi’s dream to provide fresh water for all Libyans and to make Libya self-sufficient in food production. Libyans called it the eighth wonder of the world. Western media called it a pet project and the pipe dream of a mad dog. The “mad dog” himself in 1991 prophetically said about the largest civil engineering venture in the world: ‘After this achievement, American threats against Libya will double. The United States will make excuses, but the real reason is to stop this achievement, to keep the people of Libya oppressed.’
In the light of the current world developments, there is more to the NATO destruction of the Great Man-Made River Project than being an isolated war crime. The United Nations Environment Program 2007 describes a so-called “water for profit scheme” which actively promotes the privatization and monopolization for the world’s water supplies by multinational corporations. Meanwhile the World Bank recently adopted a policy of water privatization and full-cost water pricing, with one of its former directors, Ismail Serageldin, stating: “The wars of the 21st century will be fought over water”.
Why NATO Destroyed the Great Man Made River
The documentary Pipeline to Paradise (Gaddafi’s Gift to Libya) provides insight into the project to provide water to Libya which the West distrusted and opposed from the beginning.
In July 2011, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization not only bombed the Great Man-Made River water system and pipelines near Brega, but additionally eradicated the plant that created the concrete pipes that were used as replacements during repairs. They justified their actions by claiming that the pipeline factory was used as a warehouse for the military.
When NATO forces bombed that pipe building plant, more than five security officers were wiped out, along with the water supply system that supplied the general public with water for personal consumption and agricultural purposes – hitting Libya’s essential infrastructure.
The development of the final two stages of the river project were set to be finished within the next 20 years, but thanks to NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ war on Libya, the projects’ future is in great peril.
The article says the Great Man-Made River took 30 years to build – but was destroyed by NATO in just two days. It points out:
However, there is more to the NATO ‘humanitarian’ bombardments of the Great Man-Made River Projects. In 2007, the United Nations Environment Program mentioned the water for revenue program, which earnestly encourages water to be a privately owned business. And, on the other hand, the World Bank implemented a strategy for privatizing water.
For 41 years until his demise in October 2011, Muammar Gaddafi did some truly amazing things for his country and repeatedly tried to unite and empower the whole of Africa. So, despite what you’ve heard on the radio, seen in the media or on the TV, Gaddafi did some powerful things that are not characteristic of a “vicious dictator” as portrayed by the western media.
The price of dignity (part two): The destruction of Libya says: “King Idris’ Libya was underdeveloped, inhabited by starving people, mostly illiterate and under colonial rule. Gaddafi was able to instill a dream and make it real.” Gaddafi made education and medical treatment free. In addition, Libyans who could not find suitable education or medical care in Libya were funded to go abroad! Under Gaddafi, 25% of Libyans earned university degrees! My Vision traces Gaddafi’s political and ideological journey.
Under Gaddafi, a home was considered a natural human right.
Education (through college) and medical treatment were all free
Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project
Free land, seeds, tractor, livestock, and farm house for anyone to start an organic farm
The equivalent of US $5,000 was given to mothers at the birth of a child
Electricity was free
Cheap petrol: gas was US 14 cents per liter
Gaddafi raised literacy levels from 25% of to 87%
Libya had its own state bank which provided loans to citizens at zero percent interest
Gaddafi proposed a gold dinar so African nations could get out of debt and poverty. It has been said that the gold dinar was the real reason for the NATO-led rebellion.
Imagine if Americans could go to college for free and have no college debt! Imagine if every American had a right to a home—so there were no homeless and no mortgages! Imagine if you didn’t have to pay for electricity! Imagine if American banks lent money with no interest! Imagine if every American mother received $5,000 at the birth of a child. Imagine if gas cost just 14 cents a gallon. Imagine if America had no national debt!
Gaddafi was setting an example that could have inspired the world!
15 Things Gaddafi Did For Libya
The 2017 video 15 Things Gaddafi Did For Libya shows why under Gaddafi, Libya would have been the envy of the world if other nations had known about the vision he implemented there.
Italians supplanted the Ottoman Turks in the area around Tripoli in 1911 and did not relinquish their hold until 1943 when they were defeated in World War II. Libya then passed to UN administration and achieved independence in 1951.
Following a 1969 bloodless military coup, Colonel. Muammar al-QADHAFI assumed leadership and began to espouse his political system at home, which was a combination of socialism and Islam. His name is spelled several ways, including “Gaddafi”.
The video Why Was Gaddafi Overthrown? interviews Horace Campbell, professor at Syracuse University and author of Global NATO and the Catastrophic Failure in Libya. Campbell says NATO caused many civilian deaths and destroyed Libya’s infrastructure. He explains that NATO is the instrument the capitalist class of North America and Europe use to impose their increasingly-outmoded neoliberal form of capitalism on the rest of the world. He says the assault killed 50,000 people! Compare that to the 3,000+ deaths on 9/11 at the World Trade Center for which the decades-long War on Terror has been waged on the Middle East.
Obama’s father was from Kenya, but he showed no compassion for Gaddafi who was uniting Africa through his leadership in the African Union. Gaddafi’s plan to have Africa adopt the gold dinar as the continental currency would have empowered Africa – but threatened the dollar. Gaddafi’s Man Made River Project was an incredible vision and achievement. We can build United States of Africa, Gaddafi says discusses Gaddafi’s ultimate goal. The 2017 video Libya suffers severe water shortages shows Libya’s current state after NATO’s destruction of the country in 2011.
So, why did Obama and NATO attack and destroy Libya? One reason is that the Man-Made River Project was an obstacle to the World Bank’s plans to privatize water worldwide.
In a video interview, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State in the Obama administration, triumphantly joked about the murder of Muammar Gaddafi by paraphrasing Julius Caesar’s famous statement “Vini, Vidi, Vinci” meaning “I came, I saw, I conquered”. Hillary laughingly gloated. “We came, we saw, he died!”
Pete Hoekstra, the former chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, tells the real story behind the tragic events in Benghazi and the Obama Administration’s disastrous foreign policy catastrophe in Libya. ARCHITECTS OF DISASTER documents the role played by an inexperienced president and a politicized US State Department under Hillary Clinton in turning a stable North African country into a failed jihadist state spreading terrorism throughout the Middle East and releasing a flood of fearful immigrants onto the Mediterranean and into Europe.
In his new book, Pete Hoekstra cuts to the core in identifying how a radical Islamist agenda left to its own devices cannot reconcile with Western ideals of tolerance and acceptance. Architects of Disaster creates the necessary framework in which future administrations can apply lessons learned to better inform critical foreign policy decisions.” — Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts and 2012 Republican Presidential nominee.
“A graphic autopsy of what went wrong in Libya and why.” — James Jay Carafano, Heritage Foundation
“Pete Hoekstra’s thorough examination of how the Obama Administration’s misguided policies contributed in the past few years to Libya’s disintegration is must reading. This insightful history and analysis is worth careful study, especially as America’s citizens debate what policies should come next after President Obama leaves office.” — John Bolton, former US Ambassador to the UN.”
Putin: Who Gave NATO The Right to Kill Gaddafi?
The video Putin: Who gave NATO right to kill Gaddafi? reports that Putin said the Western powers wanted to get rid of Gaddafi and install people who are more favorable to the European Union so the European companies can control the oil reserves. He pointed out that the bombing was destroying Libya’s infrastructure built over generations.
The 2011 NY Times article “Legal Acrobatics, Illegal War” explained why the attack on Libya was illegal: “It has now been over three months since the first NATO bombs fell on Libya, yet President Obama has failed to request Congressional approval for military action, as required by the War Powers Act of 1973.”
The video Gaddafi dead – Barack Obama reaction says: “US President Barack Obama says Gaddafi’s death ‘marks the end of long and painful chapter for people of Libya’. He said it was a momentous day in the history of the country and the Libyan people now had a great responsibility ahead.”
Italian researchers have blown the lid on a major vaccine scandal that all but proves the fact that vaccines are genetically engineered bioweapons.
The vaccine research and advocacy organization Corvelva recently published a series of data showing that one of the aborted human fetal cell lines used in many common childhood vaccines came from a single male fetus with genetic abnormalities.
According to the report, the MRC-5 cell line comes from a complete individual genome, meaning the entire genomic DNA of every single chromosome of a single person, in this case a sickly aborted baby boy.
Reporting on these findings, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) explains that the DNA from MRC-5 “is clearly, undoubtedly abnormal, presenting important inconsistencies with a typical human genome, that is with that of a healthy individual.”
In other words, when MRC-5 was first derived back in the 1960s, scientists at that time pulled faulty cells from an abnormal aborted child, and genetically engineered these cells into a solution that was then added to some of the earliest vaccines ever injected into children.
Not only that, but these cells were also corrupted to the point of actually being tumorigenic, meaning they have the potential to cause cancer.
“560 genes known to be associated with forms of cancer were tested and all underwent major modifications,” CHD reports.
“There are variations whose consequences are not even known, not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer,” the group goes on to explain.
For more related news about the deadly toxins contained in childhood vaccines approved by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), be sure to visit Vaccines.news.
Why does the CDC refuse to test vaccine safety using modern technology?
In addition to these findings pertaining to MRC-5, researchers from Corvelva also found that WI-38 aborted fetal cells, which are also used in vaccines, come with similar cancer-causing risks.
Both MRC-5 and WI-38, these same researchers found, also have no upper limits when it comes to how much of them are allowed to be present inside vaccines. This is due to erroneous and outdated guidelines from many moons ago that failed to recognize the tumorigenic nature of these corrupted human fetal cells.
Using the latest technology for their analysis, the Corvelva team conducted tests that drug companies and our own government refuse to conduct, revealing that many childhood vaccines are on the CDC schedule are cancer-causing.
“The first genetic anomalies were found on these lines, considered negligible for the safety of vaccines 40 years ago and, as reported in the WHO guidelines, since then no updates have been made with new sequencing technologies, particularly in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS),” CHD explains.
“[T]he consequence is that inside the vaccines that have been administered for decades is the presence of a progressively more genetically modified DNA and uncontrolled quantities has been allowed.”
The Corvelva team utilized Next NGS methodology in its metagenomic analysis, which was confirmed by several other laboratories as valid. Thus, we now have solid proof that aborted human fetal tissue is not only present in childhood vaccines, but also increases recipients’ risk of cancer.
“We are saying that the DNA contained in these vaccines is potentially TUMORIGENIC and that the guidelines to which the supervisory bodies are appealing are NOT ADEQUATE,” CHD concludes about the findings.
“Moreover, we are publicly denouncing a SERIOUS OMISSION in taking those PRECAUTIONAL measures which, on the other hand, are urgently requested for antacid drugs.”
To learn more about the toxic nature of vaccines, including the presence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their formulas, visit LearnTheRisk.org.