Ascension Connection Call Thursday 12/22/22 – The True Meaning of Christmas

The Ascension Connection Invites You to a Special Public Offering

Thursday, December 22, 2022
10 am California, 12 pm Chicago, 1 pm New York
6 pm London, 7 pm Paris, 8 pm Bulgaria

The True Meaning of Christmas
Guest Speaker from Metaphysics in the Bible, Claudio Silvaggi

The true meaning of Christ-ma-s is beautiful.
What if the story is actually more beautiful than you can imagine?

What if YOU were the chosen one… the one born on the cross.
The infinite one whom everyone knows – Can it be true?

Have you really looked deeply into the bible?
Let’s be honest. Have you tried translating ancient texts?
Maybe a couple of words were mistranslated?

What will you do when you find out?
Will your life change to one of pure love?
You are infinite, and you are from pure love.

Join us this Thursday, December 22, as we prove to you that you are the chosen one, and why you are starting to see the signs.

Claudio Silvaggi is the CEO and Founder of iyoutome, where he shares astrology, speaks of metaphysics in the Bible and shares the syncronicity of messages in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. The story is often much better and easier to understand when seen from Claudio’s higher perspective. History, and the future, are literally “written in the stars”.

Follow Claudio’s talks on:

We have just exited the winter solstice, the longest night of the year and the new moon cycle.  This means we are halfway out of the recharging dark, both literally and figuratively!

Join us for this illuminating talk and become that infinite source of love and light.

The Ascension Connection call is scheduled to start at 10am Pacific, 6pm London, but we usually start the call about 15 minutes early for people to check in and say hello to each other. The zoom link and guidelines for your participation are listed below.

Ascension Connection Zoom link –
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83875118791?pwd=K0JXZVVjOVI5K25CODlJcUZEemVpUT09

Meeting ID: 838 7511 8791
Passcode: 051259

One tap mobile
+13126266799,,83875118791# US (Chicago)
+16465588656,,83875118791# US (New York)
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
Meeting ID: 838 7511 8791
Find your local number:  https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdfRyB7ypk

Zoom Participation Guidelines – The purpose of the Ascension Connection call is to connect with others and create a cosmic community of like-minded individuals.  The calls provide a safe space to share opinions and experiences on higher dimensional topics and are intended to empower people to create a new, harmonious society with love, well-being, unity, and balance.

To fulfil that purpose, we ask that you adhere to our zoom guidelines during the meeting:

Keep your mic on mute to prevent background noise from disturbing the speaker.  Hold your questions and comments until the speaker or host invites conversation from the viewers.  Use the raise hand feature and wait till you are chosen to speak.

We shouldn’t need to ask, but please, show up appropriately clothed if you plan on having your camera on.  Turn it off when taking care of personal business such as bathroom breaks, getting dressed or if you are moving about.  It’s quite distracting (and occasionally embarrassing!)

If you are new to Zoom, here is an easy  zoom tutorial to get your started.

 

Dr. Peter McCullough Blows The Lid Off Covid

From zerohedge and QTR’s Fringe Finance:

This weekend I had an exclusive interview with Dr. Peter McCullough. Our wide ranging interview covered topics like:

  • The key differences between Moderna, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines
  • Occurrences of vaccine side effects versus what would normally be tolerated from a vaccine
  • Messenger mRNA: what we know and what we don’t know
  • Why Dr. McCullough believes Covid-19 was man made
  • Where the virus came from & exposing the “cover up” over the last 2 years
  • Gain of function research & who “created” Covid-19
  • How Dr. McCullough believes is best to treat Covid-19 and why early treatment is best

My recent podcast with Dr. Peter McCullough has been removed from YouTube and my account has been suspended for a week for “medical misinformation”.

So I am putting links to places where you can listen to the podcast on my blog:

Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist.  He manages common infectious diseases as well as the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID-19 vaccine in Dallas TX, USA.  Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.  He has dozens of peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill, America Out Loud, and on FOX NEWS Channel.

On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, New Hampshire Senate, Pennsylvania Senate, and South Carolina Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response.  Dr. McCullough has had three years of dedicated academic and clinical efforts in combating the SARS-CoV-2 virus and in doing so, has reviewed thousands of reports, participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, press releases, and has been considered among the world’s experts on COVID-19.

The Astrological Significance Of The December Solstice

From consciousreminder.com:

he solstice will take place on December 21. It is believed to mark the Sun coming to a stop and the changing of the seasons.

On that day, the northern hemisphere will see the year’s shortest day, while in the south, it will be the longest. Regardless of our location, it is an extremely sensitive day that lets us be more attuned to our surrounding energies.

Furthermore, the Solstice is also thought to thin the veil between the higher dimensions and our world. This gives us one of the best chances to connect with angelic realms and galactic energies. The Solstice in December will also see the Sun enter grounded Capricorn.

This year, Jupiter will also be highly active during this Solstice after recently entering Aries. As the planet signifies expansion, his presence can amplify the experience of the Solstice’s magical energies.

The Northern Hemisphere – The Soul’s Dark Night

In the world’s northern half, the day’s increased darkness ushers into a period of retreat. There we must listen to the subtler movements within our existence. At times, only when there is no spotlight on us when we are in complete darkness can we truly explore the depths of our core and confront our identity’s new facets.

There is nothing wrong with our personality underneath the Sun. However, staying there for too long makes us forget about our connection to some of our deepest truths.

The Solstice is a chance to enter the darkness and sit with our individual truths without any other distractions. There is no need for an explanation of these truths, nor do we need to name, identify, or even note them. Simply be with them and let them exist.

We must forget about labels and the mind’s judgment. Rather, we must let ourselves feel the emotions surging from the heart’s power. During the soul’s dark night, we must locate this stillness to be able to discover new truths and power behind our identity.

Ritual For The Soul’s Dark Night

The most essential thing you need to do for this day is simply sit in darkness. Switch off and extinguish all forms of light. Then, simply let yourself be there. Try to keep your eyes open and notice your emotions while in that darkness. A couple of minutes might be your limit, but try to push past whatever restlessness or angst might surface.

After that moment, take a soothing and relaxing bath. Let your mind clean away all the thoughts and feelings that you do not want in your life. The soul’s dark night is a period for contemplation and rest.

The Light’s Celebration – The Southern Hemisphere

For the world’s southern half, it is the beginning of summer, the light season. This is when you should get out there and shed your fearful shell. Let yourself shine.

Do not hold back or play small. During this period, leap forward while celebrating your year’s achievements. Even if the sun does not always shine in life, this day is the Universe’s reminder that the tunnel’s end always has light.

Review the things that drive and motivate you, as the Capricorn Sun is guiding us to attune our motivations and our soul’s calling. We will be encouraged to contemplate our Spirit’s fuel and recharging energies.

On this day, make sure to spend a considerable amount of time among nature. Feel the Sun’s warmth and realize that sunshine can nourish, transform, and inspire your creations.

The Ritual Of Light’s Celebration

On the day, get out of your house and sit in a shady and comfortable area. Bring a pen and a journal. Then, while sitting, observe everything you see at the moment. Maybe identify five scenes that really make you take a second look. Take a moment to witness them. Then, after letting the presence enter, begin to write or draw. Let those creative juices wherever they take you.

After feeling like the juices have settled, put your hand on the heart, close your eyes, and establish a purpose for the Universe, the planet, others, and yourself. It is a period of celebrating your entire identity. Be creative, daring, and bold on the day.

Powering up the WHO: be alert and alarmed

By Libby Klein,

One might think that of course we need an international body that can help everyone around the world to work together in times of crisis to combat pandemics and other scary global things.

Well that sounds sensible.

One might think that’s what we have the World Health Organisation (WHO) for.

Well that may have been the original idea, but it turns out there’s a few issues with the WHO. How effective is it and what role should it have?

Seems the world has skipped past those questions and gone straight to: let’s give the WHO all the power it needs so that it can do a better job of controlling pandemics.

And let’s not just tweak one or two things here and there. Let’s have a whole new treaty. And let’s call it something really long, like Convention, Agreement or Other International Instrument on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response and give it a confusing acronym, like CA+.

AND let’s also simultaneously amend the existing International Health Regulations. In ways that overlap. Through forums which are supposedly transparent but which are largely conducted in secret.

There’s a lot going on here. But don’t be fooled by the flowery language or put off by the density and complexity of the documents. Be assured there are some big issues which warrant your attention.

I’ve listed some of the issues in the most recent proposals to amend the International Health Regulations below. Please add your comments and share your insights!

Note: they don’t call a spade a spade and they don’t call a pandemic a pandemic. They call it a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern”. There’s 2 reasons for that:

they like to use long confusing names and make up impressive acronyms (“PHEIC”)

they want to have power to do all sorts of things whether or not there’s actually a pandemic and even where they think there might be something happening which one day may result in a pandemic.

Scope

The scope of WHO’s powers is to be broadened significantly, from “public health risk” to “all risks with a potential to impact public health” (Article 2)

Obligations are to be legally binding

Proposed new article 13A recognises the WHO as the authority of public health response during a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. (Note: none of the published submissions make this suggestion. Where did it come from?)

Article 13A includes an undertaking by all Member States, that they will follow WHO’s “recommendations”. Earlier in the document, “recommendations” are defined to be legally binding.

Countries are also required to ensure they have regulatory agency with legal authority to implement WHO’s dictates. (Article 4 para 1)

Countries can contest the legally binding recommendations but the Emergency Committee’s review decision will be final, following which the country must report to the WHO that it has complied. (Article 43 para 6).

The World Health Assembly can make decisions “on the strengthening of the implementation of these Regulations and improvement of compliance” – obscure language – does this mean the World Health Assembly can decide on sanctions?

Control of financing, production and supply of health products

Developed countries must provide funding (Article 44 para 2(f); Annex 1 new para “1 bis”)

The World Health Assembly will oversee expenditure of funds that Member States are required to provide (Article 44A para 2).

WHO decides on allocation of health products (Article 13A).

WHO requires Member States to scale up production (Article 13A para 4), and to supply health products to the WHO or other Member States as directed by the WHO (Article 13 para 5).

WHO tells us what we can do

The Director General – a single person – can make temporary, binding “recommendations” on the basis that an event has the potential to become a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and those recommendations can continue in force beyond the end of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (Article 15).

The concept of public health measures which are aimed at achieving “the appropriate level of health protection” is to be removed. The new objective is to attain the “highest achievable level of health protection” without any consideration of proportionality.

WHO can impose restrictions on international travel – and may not even disclose the information it has relied on in doing so – Article 11.

Any discussions that countries have amongst themselves must be reported to the WHO (Article 44 para 3).

Countries must comply with requests by WHO or other countries (Annex 10).

Governments will be required to enforce compliance with WHO health measures by all actors including NGOs (Article 42).

WHO tells us what we can say

Countries must cooperate in censorship of information which the WHO deems to be “false and unreliable (Article 44 para 1(h)).

WHO will strengthen capacities to counter misinformation and disinformation (Annex 1 para 7).

A single person decides when there is a Public Health Emergency of International Concern

The Director General – a single person – unilaterally determines whether there is a (potential or actual) Public Health Emergency of International Concern in a particular location. (Article 12 para 1).

In deciding whether to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, the Director General does not have to consult with the country concerned or its own Emergency Committee (Article 12 para 2). (And at any rate the Director General chooses the members of the Emergency Committee – Article 48 para 2.)

The ability of the country to object to the WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern has been removed (Article 12 para 3).

Your personal data will be shared globally

There is to be “secure global digital exchange of health information” (Article 44 para 2(d))

Centralised data sharing is to be controlled by the WHO (Article 11)

Governments can agree to share and store your personal health data (Article 45 para 4).

The focus is on production and supply of pharmaceutical products rather than safety and efficacy

Regulatory dossiers submitted by manufacturers concerning safety and efficacy, and manufacturing and quality control measures, have to be shared, but countries can only use that information for accelerating the manufacture and supply of those products and technologies. There is no reference to using the data to make their own assessment of safety and efficacy, betraying a blind spot on the part of the drafters: they are so focussed on facilitating the imposition of pharmaceutical products on everybody that they don’t even think to make provisions regarding sharing of information for the purpose of assessing or monitoring safety and efficacy.

There is a requirement to adopt “legal, administrative and technical measures to diversify and increase production of health products” (Annex 1 para 7) (but not to promote development of early treatment protocols for example).

WHO can have secret dealings with non-State actors

WHO can deal with non-State actors as it sees fit and does not have to provide full disclosure.

Rules of engagement: Malaysia (article 12 para 7) and Africa (article 13A para 7) have proposed new wording which ostensibly puts some guard rails around how the WHO engages with non-State actors, by requiring the WHO to comply with paragraph 73 of the Framework for Engagement of Non-State Actors (FENSA). However, that paragraph in FENSA does not impose any constraints on the WHO. On the contrary, it grants the Director-General complete flexibility: “…the Director-General may exercise flexibility as might be needed in the application of procedures of this framework in those responses, when he/she deems necessary, in accordance with WHO’s responsibilities as health cluster lead.” This complete flexibility is given to a single individual, the Director-General of the WHO.

In terms of disclosure, the new article 13A does require the WHO to report all its engagements with other stakeholders to the World Health Assembly, and to “provide documents and information relating to such engagements upon request of State Parties.” However, this is far from requiring full disclosure. The WHO could supply summary documents and information, rather than making full disclosure. The WHO has not disclosed who has proposed this new article 13A.

 

Source: https://libbyklein.substack.com

US Is ‘Empire of Sodom’ Says Head of Russian Parliament, ‘Not Easy for Normal Families’

Yet another top Russian leader blasts the moral degeneracy of the West.

It seems like every week now, another senior Russian political leader is hammering the West with harsh rhetoric for its shocking moral degeneracy. A couple of months ago it was Putin, calling Western elites ‘satanic’, more recently foreign minister Sergey Lavrov and his spokeswoman Maria Zakharov have been merciless in their lambasting, as has former President Dmitry Medvedev.

Last week, it was the turn of the Head of Russia’s Parliament, Vyacheslav Volodin, who fired off a zinger to his enormous Telegram following, echoing Ronald Reagan’s ‘Empire of Evil’ epithet with which he branded the USSR. ‘Empire of Sodom’ pretty much sums up the US ruling class.

It appears that Russia’s elites are warming to the theme, recognizing that they score political points both at home and abroad among the half of the Western population which is not on board with their elites’ radical left-wing degeneracy.

Head of Russian Parliament  Vyacheslav Volodin

Volodin was speaking in defense of “ordinary”  US families on Telegram in the wake of the passage of the so-called “Respect for Marriage” act. Volodin, the third most powerful politician in Russia and considered by some to be a potential successor to President Putin, struck out at the US administration for sidelining regular families with the bill. He stated,

“Now the concept of marriage as a union between a man and a woman does not exist in the United States. It will not be easy for ordinary families in the sodom empire that the U.S. has become…The path chosen by Washington will definitely lead to more problems for American society and the degeneration of the nation.”

The statement will surely resonate with beleaguered US conservatives, who feel forsaken by their own government and representatives, as even many Republicans crossed the aisle to make this law reality.

Such aggressive statements from Russian politicians reflect the rapidly forming civilizational divide that is forming between traditionalist countries like Russia, and the breakaway civilization of the West. Given the situation in Ukraine, it is rapidly becoming a contest of wills to see whose civilizational ideals will triumph. This is an existential fight for Russia, and all conservative and traditional minded peoples, for if the Globalists and the Transhumanists win, it will the sunset of normal life not just for Russia, but globally.  Russian victory in this struggle is the only alternative to a dark future of ‘owning nothing and being happy about it’ and eating bugs for dinner, forever.

The response to Putin’s ‘Satan’ speech was massive in the West, with conservatives across the board applauding Putin for finally stating what they agree with. It appears Russian narrative managers have given the green light to their top spokespeople, realizing that this is effective PR in the West, hitting Western elites where they are weak, in addition to being true.

This law, and the Russian reaction, is just an example of the moral and spiritual side of this conflict, which many Russian officials has described as a ‘spiritual struggle’ or ‘holy war.’

 

Source: https://gorthodox.com/en

Why I’m No Longer Talking to People About the Vaccine

From brownstone.org:

 

I recently had an email exchange with a friend who is no slouch when it comes to matters intellectual. He speaks several languages and is very politically engaged. I’ll call him X. The exchange he and I had is similar if not identical to exchanges all of us have had over the past few years. I’d sent him Geert Vanden Bossche’s My bible on the c-19 mass vaccination experiment (substack 12/12/22). What GVB said in his substack entry set X on fire. Thus began the donnybrook.

I’m going to step around the particulars of GVB’s argument. They aren’t germane.

X then contacted his nephew, who works at the CDC, to see if between them they could set me straight. His nephew sent along “The Doomsday Prophecy of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche,” which he described as “pretty clear and even-handed” when it came to refuting the claims of GVB.

The article was written by Jonathan Jarry, who has some association with McGill University. Jarry isn’t a doctor, so he had to find one to straighten everyone out on the issue of GVB. He contacted Dr. Paul Offit. Now, by my lights, Dr. Offit has some pretty peculiar views on the vaccines, especially as they pertain to children, but again, what he has to say on that issue isn’t pertinent for our purposes.

Jarry stated that the vaccine incited the “production of neutralizing antibodies,” which, I suppose, would be something to get excited about, if said neutralizing antibodies stopped a person from contracting or spreading the virus without causing collateral damage to the immune system. And, of course, what goes on in the body after injection with the wonder drug is vastly more complicated than vaccine-induced antibody production. In a passage where he discusses the potential of the virus to mutate, Jarry was clear to point out that mutation wasn’t actually much of a problem, as we could produce updated vaccines faster than the virus could mutate (I paraphrase and exaggerate slightly).

Jarry was all on board with citizens being boosted several times a year to stop the spread of a virus with an IFR lower than that of the common flu. He lives in Canada.

Where he lives isn’t germane either. But it tells us something.

That someone who works for the CDC had to go to Canada to find an article from over a year ago (3/24/21) to set me straight on GVB also tells us something, but that too isn’t germane. X and I went back and forth on arguments that are far too familiar and mundane at this point in time to bother mentioning. We know them by heart.

However, at one point, I was certain X was going to begin to see things just a little bit my way—which is that flatten the curve and stop the spread became over the passage of time an exercise in lunacy—when I sent him a quote from the esteemed Dr. Paul Offit on the question of bivalent boosters. How can I phrase this delicately? X is a booster maniac.

Here is what Dr. Offit said: “I’m uncomfortable that we would move forward—that we would give millions or tens of millions of doses to people—based on mouse data.” He said this to the Wall Street Journal, which identified him as an “FDA vaccine advisory member.” Dr. Offit may have had his qualms about the bivalent booster, and those famous eight mice, but when last I looked, the FDA overall had no problems with said bivalent booster. Colleges across America are now mandating it for students. But none of that is pertinent.

We are talking about the X factor. X had been caught in a contradiction. His go-to doctor had just undermined his position. It changed nothing. The needle in his brain didn’t budge.

I told X, before we got going, that if he had wanted to change his views on the pandemic and what happened in response to it over the past three years, he would long ago have done so. The truth is out there (X Files). At the end of our miniature donnybrook, X cited my remark and said that he was too old a dog to learn new tricks. Now that is relevant—not the age part.

As citizens, concerned citizens, we engage in debate not to hear ourselves talk, but to convince others of the truth of what we claim. What is supposed to happen, in a debate, ideally speaking, is that the person who makes the best and most convincing argument carries the day. What that means in everyday language is that if I best you in a debate, you change your mind. The same goes for me. Evidence changes people’s minds.

Otherwise, why bother talking at all?

And that’s where we are. This is the X factor. Everyone is dug in. Nothing anyone says changes a thing. We talk and talk. That’s all anyone does in this country.

We might just as well be shooting at each other.

Author

  • George O'Har

    George O’Har is an MIT Ph.D., Air Force veteran, and former electrical engineer. At Boston College, he taught courses on Literature and Technology, Utopia, Creative Writing, Creative Non-Fiction and American Literary History