US Corporation buys time by extorting Thai gold, conning Chinese royals – June 5, 2023

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION managed to avoid default by extorting gold from the Thai Royal family and conning Chinese royals to hand over some of their gold. However, this stunt is not going to go unpunished and the Corporation is still going to be liquidated, multiple intelligence agency sources say. It is a mathematical certainty. As one commentator notes “You can’t borrow 7.3% of GDP from now until eternity and get away with it.”

A member of the dragon family says Chinese royals based in Taiwan were fooled by a fake King Charles who promised “to fund massive humanitarian projects” and also offered huge kickbacks. However, the Khazarian Mafia reneged on their promises as soon as they got the money. The dragon family now says they did not sanction this deal and promised to take “certain counter-measures.”

The other thing that happened was the King of Thailand, who is being held in hostage in Germany, was forced to trade gold belonging to the people of Thailand for worthless US Treasury bills, according to Thai royal family sources. Presumably, the fact his eldest daughter has been in a medically induced coma since January had something to do with the blackmail.

In addition to this, on the day the US “debt ceiling deal” was announced official Chinese news outlets were bragging about promises they extorted from their American debt slaves.

For one thing, Xinhua proclaimed “The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement took effect on Friday…for all 15 members.”

This means the KM “handed over control” of former US allies like ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand to the Chinese.

This is a typical KM con job, selling stuff they do not own to gullible buyers.

On the same day, the Rockefeller-controlled Brookings Institution think tank issued a report calling for the greater integration of the US and Chinese economies. Translation: “We will hand over control of the US to China.”

We also note that -just as various defense chiefs were gathering in Singapore for a conference- an incident was staged in which a US warship blinked and made evasive maneuvers to avoid a Chinese warship blocking its path in the Taiwan Strait. This was a public sign the US was not willing to fight a war over Taiwan, Japanese military sources say.

In light of all this, we asked various secret society sources for more of the backstory about why the US Corporation was allowed to continue.

Japanese right-wingers connected to the Emperor say they were promised President Donald Trump would officially take over from the Rockefeller Joe Biden puppet in late June or early July.

We have heard this story before. The last time we were told he would take over was in March. So, believe it when you see it.

Next, the P3 Freemasons came out with their own back story. According to them:

“Elon Musk is in China, does not call for Taiwanese independence, builds factories and businesses in the PRC, and supports cooperation on an equal footing with the Communist Party. From these actions, it can be understood that sensitive forces are preparing Musk for the presidency of the United States when the elders of Washington will die. And this could happen very soon since we are all in our eighties.”

CIA sources for their part say “Janet Yellen (the Treasury Department) is issuing up to $1 Trillion in T- Bills and will flood the market. This is nothing more than a shuffling of fake computer-generated money from one side of the ledger to the other. It will definitely backfire as this will pull liquidity out of the financial markets.”

No matter what promises these snakes made, you can be sure they will break them as soon as they get the opportunity.

For example, they are still planning to start an all-out nuclear war before the fake Biden term ends -and the new money runs out- in January 2025, according to MI6.

Next, we note that as soon as the money came through, the fake US government passed a budget that included unlimited financing for Ukraine. As Russian Ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov says: “The new US ‘security package’…effectively fuels the rotten regime in Kyiv.”

Ukraine is the world capital of money laundering, human trafficking and organ harvesting. “On April 14, 2022, the Ukrainian Parliament passed Law 5610, which allows Ukraine to export organs abroad. These laws were promoted by former acting health minister Ulyana Suprun and let hospitals, prisons, military units and orphanages use the organs of anyone in their care without their consent,” according to Polish intelligence sources.

We also note that three-quarters of the weapons being sent to Ukraine are being sold on the international black market. As an example, here you can see a Mexican cartel member carrying a US-made Javelin anti-tank missile that was traded for drugs, according to Mexican sources.

Of course, trading weapons for drugs is nothing new for the US INC.

The Chinese embassy in Mexico for their part says the fentanyl precursors it is accused of by the US of selling to Mexico actually come from the EU (i.e. Ukraine).

Needless to say, the white hats are not taking all this lying down. A series of emergency meetings were held in Canada, China, Japan, the US and elsewhere to


move forward with the arrest of Khazarian mafia leaders.

For example, Google’s Mexico offices and the United Nations offices next door were evacuated last week after a “bomb threat.” Mexican government sources say this was an operation against the Rockefeller/Biden regime.

In Canada, a military tribunal held this past weekend presented extensive evidence of the vaccine and COVID-19 crimes of the KM-controlled Canadian government. The military police are now acting on this evidence, tribunal sources say.

In China, Ukrainian peace envoy Li Hui, who has just visited Kyiv, Warsaw, Berlin, Paris and Brussels says “Russia is right under international law to undertake its special military operation against the Ukrainian ‘integral nationalists’.”

Also, even as the Chinese publicly refuse to meet with fake Rockefeller Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Tan Kefei, spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense says “Military contact and exchanges between the two countries have never been suspended.” In other words, the Chinese military (as opposed to some CCP officials) are working with the US white hats and not the Rockefellers.

In Japan, right-wingers also held an emergency meeting to take action against the KM promise to hand over control of the country to the Chinese Communist Party. The Japanese military and police prosecutors are now fact-checking the puppet regime’s use of fraudulent PCR tests to vaccinate the populace with dangerous substances. They have already been informed Research journals have withdrawn well over 800 articles on COVID-19 because they were fraudulent.

The military is now calling for the removal of the fraudulently installed vaccine-pushing LDP puppet regime. There is much more about this we cannot talk about for operational security reasons.

However, we do note de facto North Korean leader Kim Jo Jong accused the UN of acting as a “political appendage” to the United States.

The reports of North Korea taking a seat on the board of the privately owned WHO (World Harm Organization), was just a failed attempt at appeasement, North Korean sources add.

In the US too, military white hats are taking action and are fully aware Joe Biden is “just the front man, he’s being handed the script…the real question is how long do [the American people] put up with this. They are violating the constitution, you can’t just push a button and create money,” says Colonel Douglas MacGregor.

In a clear sign of white hat military action, 24 Republican governors announced deployments of National Guard troops to assist Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s border security efforts.

One reason the troops are being deployed is that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has been paying a staggering $18,000 per child to “sponsor” unaccompanied minors. The children were being placed with abusive “sponsors” and up to 85,000 “sponsored” children are missing.

The US also needs martial law because the social order is disintegrating., For example, “retail theft has increased “tenfold in the last five years,” which is not “an understatement,” while violence has “increased exponentially.” Giant Food CEO Ira Kress says. “We have the police come to our stores … they’ll take the information, they’ll record it,”… “But there’s really nothing being done with that because they had two homicides that were a bank robbery and two shootings. So it’s like, where are they going to focus their time and attention?” said Chris Torossian, former manager in the bakery department

When the government cannot even protect retail outlets, it is no longer functioning, hence the need for the military to take action.

Also, in case you haven’t figured it out, the various January 6th, Hunter Biden, FBI contempt of Congress and other proceedings in Washington DC are “nothing more than a circus show for the sheeple,” CIA sources note.

To confirm it is a show here you can again see an example of Biden’s Pedo Satan mask malfunctioning.

Then you have a mass corporate pedophilia promotion in June disguised as “pride.”

They aren’t even hiding it anymore. Disney has just given the green light to a new show about a girl falling in love with the devil. Lately, Disney “often pushes content with themes around witchcraft, sex, and violence,” according to the family-friendly entertainment organization MovieGuide.

Next, take a look at this map of sex offenders living in Israel. Now do you understand why so many members of Congress have Israeli citizenship?

If this is not enough to justify military action, take a look at what big pharma is still up to.

The detailed video below describes how Pfizer and its partners hijacked the governments of Brazil and Argentina. They didn’t need to hijack the US “government” because they already own it.

In their next move, Big Pharma and Microsoft are teaming up in something called ‘ID2020 Alliance’ which will combine vaccinations with implantable microchips to create your digital ID

They want to link this with central bank digital currencies. Take a look at this letter shared by someone who received it last week for their Coles Mastercard. If you cut through the gobbledygook you will see it will let them cut you off if you try transactions in conflict with UN Sustainable Agenda goals, which include attempting to purchase meat, more than 3 items of clothing per year, etc. “Many people still do not understand what CBDC’s really mean for the future. It is digital prison; forever,” a Mossad source comments.

To prevent people from figuring this out, the Rockefeller-owned WHO plans to use “Social Listening Surveillance Systems” to monitor public communications for “misinformation”.

People are figuring it out anyway. For example here you watch Australian Senator Alex Antic spell out the truth about the World Health Organization’s so-called “Pandemic Treaty.”

Also, Brendan Murphy former Chief Medical Officer of Australia & the current Secretary of the Department of Health finally admitted vaccine mandates “are no longer justified”.

Warning about the mRNA jab

The FDA has also revoked authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.

The people of the West also need to thank the Russians for helping end the so-called “pandemic.”

Igor Kirillov, head of the Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defense Force (RCBD), says the US is actively setting up Biolabs near the borders of its geopolitical adversaries and studying “economically significant infections” there outside of domestic jurisdiction. That is one reason why they took action against the Ukraine.

Did you notice that the Covid variants stopped when Russia started going after the Biolabs? Omicron was declared a variant of concern on 11/26/2021.

Russia began neutralizing US Biolabs in Ukraine on 02/24/2022. No variants since. Coincidence?

The Ukrainians are also now taking action. Ukraine’s State Bureau of Investigation is investigating Vladimir Zelensky for “High Treason.” This came after the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv initiated a criminal case “against Vladimir Zelenskyy himself, the head of the presidential office Andriy Yermak, his deputy Roman Mashovets, as well as the ex-chairman of the SBU Ivan Bakanov and the former deputy secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Ruslan Demchenko. They are being charged with actions that led to the deaths of tens of thousands of Ukrainians.

No wonder Zelensky’s entire body has been seen strangely twitching during a meeting with UK’s Sunak in Moldova This is probably due to fear of returning to Kiev as well as coke withdrawal symptoms.

The Russian Christians are also fighting to expose the US pedophile government. That is why Biden sexual assault accuser ex-Senate staffer Tara Reade feels ‘safe’ in Russia after fleeing over safety concerns

Also, Channel One in Russia has reported on pedophile Hunter Biden.

Now Hungarian and Serbian Christians are joining the Russians by going after the KM crime nexus in Kosovo. As Tass reports:

Serbian Defense Minister Milos Vucevic said on Monday that the Serbian army had been put on high alert following the escalation in Kosovo and Metohija and that army units had been deployed along the administrative border with Kosovo.

This comes as Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto at a rally in Serbia said: “Both of our countries are…being mercilessly attacked by [KM]…because we have strong leader…we want peace in Ukraine and…are committed to family values.”,perseverance%20in%20standing%20up%20for%20their%20national%20interests

Of course, none of the Western puppet leaders can appear in public now without being attacked by onlookers. In the latest example, a crowd of Germans booed German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and accused him of inciting war

In Israel, the army refuses to act against people who surrounded Crime Minister Benyamin Netanyahus’ house. “Everyone with eyes can see the Khazerians traded Netanyahu out for someone very evil! He’s gone but his actor is here & the people want him gone!” an Israeli patriot tweets.

Most of the world is also acting to help liberate the KM-occupied West. “BRICS is no longer an ‘alternative,…[it] strongly supports UN Security Council reform,…to build a fairer, inclusive and open international architecture with sustainable development at its core”, External Affairs Minister of India Subrahmanyam Jaishankar says.

This is more than just talk. Iran, Russia, Oman, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, Pakistan and India have agreed to form a naval alliance to jointly establish security of the northern Indian Ocean, Iranian military sources say.

That is why the United Arab Emirates decided to withdraw from the US-led international maritime force in the region.

Last week also saw a flurry of major cooperation agreements – between Iran, Iraq, Russia, and China. Iran, and Iraq, and Saudi Arabia – “They are in this new global alliance,” notes

OPEC barred Reuters, Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, and Dow Jones from the Vienna meeting where they announced a one million barrel per day cut in production. The ban was ordered by Saudi Arabia which considers these reporters to be nothing more than Rockefeller agents. The fact the Rothschild-controlled Financial Times was allowed speaks volumes. It is a good guess the production cuts are concentrated on Rockefeller-owned fields.

Also, last week the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders signed an agreement of mutual recognition in Moscow. This means the KM attempt to incorporate the region into their planned greater Khazaria has been stopped.

One of the key figures behind the defeat of the KM plot in the region President Recep Erdogan of Turkey (now represented by an avatar) showed who he stands with by canceling an expected attendance at a European summit.

In spite of all this, members of the fake Biden cabinet are trying desperately to deny reality. As an example, watch Rockefeller slave Anthony Blinken tell outrageous lies about the situation in Ukraine.

As an NSA source comments “The last NAZI broadcast in March 1945 showed the NAZIs were winning on all fronts.. sinking US Battleships, destroying Russian Tanks, etc. Six weeks later came the NAZI surrender. So here we are… bank glitches, the CBDC being hatched, dozens of things and a crumbling financial system….”

The big question, of course, is will all this force the Nazi white hat-created secret space force out of the closet?

This news item suggests it might:

“In a major move, Space Force selects Florida’s Space Coast for STARCOM training headquarters.”

Also, there are more and more signs that suppressed technology is coming out of the closet.

Japanese researchers, for example, have announced they can grow babies in the lab and select “desirable” genes for them.

Next, we see the latest example of a “Jewish space laser,” this time in Chile.

So, with that, here are the latest project Blue Beam Visuals.

1. Cloaked UFOS over Table Moutain, Cape Town, South Africa.

2. The Aurora Program TR3B

3. A plasma energy multi-dimensional craft

4. Multi-colored light UFO over Mexico 12-04-2023

5. Plasma energy craft over Ontario, Canada 13-02-2023

6. UFO over Arizona, USA 21-05-2023




Russia Forewarned UNSC and UN Secretary General of Kiev’s Plan to Destroy the Kakhovskaya Dam

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky,

The evidence is overwhelming. The Kiev regime was behind the plot to blow-up the dam. It’s “a war crime” against the Ukrainian people, instigated by the Zelensky government.  

The mainstream media in chorus blames Russia. (See our analysis of the MSM media coverage below). 

Ask yourself, why on earth would Russia flood its own positions within the territories under its control?

Our message to MSM journalists: It’s “elementary logic”. Use your common sense. Why would they do it?  A “Russian Roulette style ritual Hara-kiri” ordered by the Kremlin? 

The impacts on people’s lives are devastating in both Ukraine and Russia. 

The blow-up of the dam has had repercussions on the supply of water to Crimea, which visibly is the detriment of  Russia. See map below. 

Was US-NATO complicit in the conduct of this criminal agenda?

See Moscow’s standpoint in the following text issued by the Russian Embassy in the UK:

“We took note of the fact that the unannounced visit to Kiev by #UK  Foreign Secretary @JamesCleverlyon 5-6 June occurred at the same time as the sharp increase in military activities by the AFU along with #Kievregime’s attempts to destabilise the situation in bordering Russian regions. 

These circumstances can hardly be considered a coincidence. A personal visit by a high-ranking British emissary and his encouraging public statements cannot be viewed by the Western-controlled Kiev regime as anything other than an endorsement to engage in further military adventures and acts of sabotage against the peaceful citizens of Russia – for instance, the intentional destruction of facilities of the #Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Station which can lead to dramatic humanitarian consequences for the civilian population of the flooded territory.
London’s longstanding deliberate efforts to escalate the anti-Russian proxy conflict in #Ukraine, including by supplying Kiev with more lethal and long-range offensive weapons, leave no doubt that words of peace and value of Ukrainian lives mean nothing to London. In this context Mr Cleverly’s enthusiastic musings about the blooming of flowers and leaves in Kiev sound particularly cynical.”


Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, Update, June 7, 2023

Below is the detailed article published by Global Research on June 6, 2023


The Western media in chorus is blaming the Russians without acknowledging the fact that the issue of the Hydroelectric Kakhovskaya Dam had been brought to the attention of the United Nations Security Council back on October 21, 2022. 

The document was made available to all members of the UN Security Council. 

The UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres was fully aware of the letter addressed to him by Russia’s UN Permanent Representative regarding Kiev’s plan to blow up the dam. 

What did he do? Nothing.The UNSC had the responsibility to open an investigation. 


Russian MFA Spox Maria #Zakharova: On October 21, 2022, Russia’s Ambassador to the UN sent a letter to the UN Secretary General regarding the Kiev regime’s plans to destroy the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric dam in Kherson province.

Here is a question for @antonioguterres: what has been done?


Here’s the letter:


Russia had warned of potential catastrophic flooding and loss of life (see October 21, 2022 advisory to UNSC). In recent months, Russia conducted the evacuation of people on the East side of the Dnieper.

And here is the coverage of the mainstream media, casually blaming Russia, without a shred of evidence:

“Everything is going to die here,’ a man named Serhiy living in Kherson said. ‘All the living creatures, and people will be flooded out.

‘People will suffer. There’s already no water coming out of taps – why not, no one knows.’

Other Kherson residents said the water level in some parts of the city had already reached 9ft high and they could see more water headed their way.

Ukrainian authorities have previously warned that the dam’s failure could unleash 18million cubic meters (4.8billion gallons) of water and flood Kherson and dozens of other towns and settlements, home to hundreds of thousands of people.

The cause of the blasts is not yet clear, although Ukraine warned late last year that Russian forces had mined the dam as they retreated from Kherson and Ukraine’s state hydroelectric company said the Kakhova plant was destroyed by an explosion in the engine room – suggesting it was attacked from within rather than by external strikes.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday told a Vatican peace envoy that the destruction of the Kakhovka dam would have ‘dire consequences’ for people and nature.

‘This crime carries enormous threats and will have dire consequences for people’s lives and the environment,’ he told Italian cardinal Matteo Zuppi as the two met in Kyiv, according to a presidency statement.

As tens of thousands of Ukrainians flee their homes…

  • Ukraine’s state hydroelectric company said the Kakhovka plant was totally destroyed by an engine room blast
  • Ukrainian prime minister Denys Shmyhal said that up to 80 settlements are at risk of flooding
  • Kyiv officials alleged that Moscow destroyed the dam in order to slow down its long-awaited counteroffensive
  • Zelensky said that Russian forces must be ‘expelled from every corner’ of his nation for their ‘terrorist actions’
  • Moscow has blamed Kyiv’s forces for the strikes on the dam which is in Russian-held territory  (Daily Mail, June 6, 2023)

According the NBC (June 6,2023) quoting “authoritative” sources as well as US “intelligence” which need to be “declassified”:

“The United States government has intelligence that is leaning toward Russia as the culprit of the attack on the dam in Ukraine, according to two U.S. officials and one Western official.

President Joe Biden’s administration was working to declassify some of the intelligence and share it as early as Tuesday afternoon.

The motive behind the explosion was still being assessed, but the collapse appears likely to make it more difficult for Ukrainian forces to conduct a river crossing and also presents a difficult humanitarian challenge, the Western official said. (NBC, June 6, 2023, emphasis added)

Why on earth would they blow up the Kakhovka dam, which was in territory under Russian control.

According to independent geopolitical analyst Don Hank

The Russian Ministry of defense has been warning for over a year now that the Kiev regime is  likely to collapse the dam up river from Kherson and cause a catastrophe.

Well, sure enough, today [June 6, 2023] they did just that and the West is stupidly buying into the propaganda that the Russians are to blame.

Of course the Russians wouldn’t destroy their own dam, [In territory they control] but if the combined West admits that the Russians were right all along and that their “Nazi pals” burst the dam, that would be bad publicity for Washington.

In the case of the Nord Stream sabotage, they pretended to start an “investigation” that went nowhere, but this time, the unbiased UN chief just skipped that step and laid it right on Putin, exonerating the Nazis from the outset.”

Informed and officially advised on October 21, 2022 (with distribution to all members of the UNSC)  here is UNSG’s Antonio Guterres’ response regarding the destruction of the dam.


UN Secretary-General António Guterres pleaded ignorance: “he told reporters in New York outside the Security Council that the UN had no access to independent information to verify how the catastrophe had occurred.” That’s an outright lie.


Final Message from Dr Rashid Buttar


“Of course there’s going to be a second wave but it’s not going to be from the virus, it’s going to be from the vaxxine-induced injury, which will compounded by the fear that they’ve created, which will be further compounded by the introduction of new technology, i.e., the 5G, which some people are saying is going to cause COVID – of course, it’s not going cause COVID – but the science is clear that it causes a disruption in the voltage-gated calcium channels, causing a permeability to many different pathogens, especially enveloped viruses, of which coronavirus is one of those types but for any type of pathogen.

“So, this is what the concern was back then and of course, we’ve seen that that happened and the multiple waves that came out.

“Well now, there’s something that’s going to be taking place – and I’ve had multiple confirmations of this and actually, heard a video and talked to one of the parties that had put that video out – and to say that at least, it’s disturbing.

“But I’m going to go ahead and just read this to you and some of you may have already heard about this. So essentially, what appears to be coming down the pipeline is that, what has been introduced, as far as the vaxxines, as we know them, the COVID vaxxines, regardless of the type. They have introduced into individuals through these vaxxines and through these subsequent boosters, other components.

“We have all heard of some of these components. We’ve heard about the nanotechnology and of course, there’s the spike protein, there are all these different things that have been found. There’s been the graphene oxide, graphene hydroxide. There’s been all sorts of different things that have been found within these vaxxines – and still, things that we haven’t discovered.

“I know that about a year ago, they found Round Up – that’s glyphosate, that’s a weedkiller – in the vaccines. Now, what is Round Up, a weedkiller doing inside of the vaxxines? We don’t understand that but obviously, there’s all sorts of things being found that shouldn’t be.

“But this portion that I’m going to talk about now is something that had been – I guess the right words are, I had suspicions that they were introducing something into the vaxxines that are designed to cause a detrimental effect at a time when they want the detrimental effect to take place, meaning that it’s almost like a sleeper cell within your own body. It’s there. You don’t know it’s there, there’s no effect from it but then, it can be called upon or triggered based upon a type of signal, a chemical or maybe two inert, relatively innocuous ingredients but when they come together, they cause something to happen and that would be the trigger, if you will that would cause these sleeper cells within your body to awaken.

“Now, I felt that, in fact, even before COVID, that there were things being introduced into our bodies that shouldn’t be introduced into our bodies but now, we have confirmation of this and I’m going to go specifically and talk to you about what is actually in there.

“So, essentially, now from two different sources, we have confirmation – and I’ve talked to one of those sources, myself – that there’s something within the vaxxines that is being considered as a ‘bioweapon’, which again is not a new term but that this particular component within the vaxxines, it’s almost like a payload.

“Now, think of a payload, what does that mean? A payload is like when there’s a detonation, you have a truck or a trailer and it’s got a bunch of dynamite or explosives. It’s called a payload. It’s designed to deliver a massive eruption or detonation. So they call it a payload. It wouldn’t be like a normal onslaught, it’d be like a massive onslaught.

“And so, there’s going to be a payload with some type of pathogen that will be activated by a sequence of 5G bursts and these will be of the 16 to 18 Ghz frequency and it will be essentially three bursts that will be sequential and last about a minute and those bursts will actually create a signal that will release this payload that is within the hydrogel component of the vaxxines.

“So, what, exactly is in there? There’s supposed to be three pathogens and these three pathogens are – I’m not 100% sure what these pathogens are but one of them is what they call the Marburg virus, which is essentially is a pathogen that…creates the hemorrhagic fever component, it’s similar to that and according to – if you look that up – it says that there’s a 22% to 90% mortality rate and Google said that it’s 88% mortality, meaning that out of 100 people that get it, 88% or 88 out of a hundred will die…

“Once that release has taken place, once that signal from the 5G tower signals this release – let me take that back – it’s a sequence in three bursts that lasts a minute long in the 18 Ghz frequency or maybe it’s the 16 Ghz frequency, I don’t know specifically, yet which one but it’s between 16 and 18, it will cause the hydrogel to release this payload of a virus, a viral load, and there are supposed to be three different types, I don’t know all the three different types but Marburg is supposed to be one of those.

“When that happens, then everyone that’s had the vaxxine and these boosters will have this Marburg virus released. And again, we know that 22% to up to 90% mortality rate but that’s when somebody encounters it in a natural way, if you will. When it’s inside your body, already-introduced and released, it’s probably going to be 100% mortality rate, meaning that everybody that has it, it’s going to be triggered and it’s going to be released. 

“And when that happens, yes, obviously, these people are going to die. So, we’re talking, not hundreds of thousands, we’re talking millions and millions of people worldwide; they’re going to have this effect. 

“But what’s even more concerning than that and what could be more concerning than that? Guys, remember: everybody had a choice. Some people chose to take this. People ran for it and I can’t say that I’m disappointed, because when you’ve talked as much as I have about this issue and tried to warn as many people as I have tried to warn and they still do it, at a certain point, there’s only so much I ca do and I’m not going to sit here and have tears that are being shed, because people were not smart enough to use their own brains and look at the science and instead, they just jumped on the bandwagon and believed the BS that was being fed to them, because that point, people have to be responsible for themselves.

“You reap the rewards and pay the consequences of your actions, so this is something that – most of you know this and many of you have been talking about this just as long as I’ve been talking about it, over two years, at this point – and I can’t feel sorry for those people and now of course, there may have been some people that were forced to do it but then, the warnings were out there.

“When people said to me, ‘Oh, what am I supposed to do? I have to do this, it’s my job. If I don’t do it, then I’m going to get fired.’

“It’s your life! You’re telling me that having a job is more important than your life? So you’re going to go ahead and do that job and then take the shot, because you’re saying, ‘Well, I’m being forced to do it and I gotta do it for my job’?…

“People tell me, ‘What am I going to do? I’d end up homeless!’ Well, my God, at least you’re alive. Homeless and alive versus the shot and being dead in the next 6 months to two years – I don’t think there’s much of a choice there. How can you even say that, ‘Oh! They’re forcing me!’ What do you mean? Unless they tied you down and put a gun to your head and said, ‘Take the shot, or else I’m going to blow your head off, that’s the only way you could say ‘forced’.

“And I would say, ‘Then, blow my head off!’ I wouldn’t take the vaxxine. That’s just me, though. The point that I’m making: I can’t get sad at this juncture anymore about the people that have had the vaxxine but here’s what the real issue is: So, yes, millions of lives will be lost and yes, it’s disappointing and yes, it’s saddening and yes, it is what it is. There’s nothing that I can do to change that. I’ve tried everything that I could and many of you have done the same thing and many other doctors and researches and scientists tried to do the same thing but what’s the most concerning, beyond that – because, again they chose that, they took that option.

“The most egregious thing is that those massive numbers of death will then cause a sequence of events to start and once these cells burst and release the Marburg epidemic, then the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization will assume control, because there’s massive amounts of death taking place.

“And that’s where that massive danger lies, because if they can now justify, ‘Oh my God! There’s a massive hemorrhagic fever!’ and they’re going to take it to the next level, to scare more people, to force more people to get vaxxinated, your going to have all those people dying and they’re going to try to justify forcing individuals to get the vaxxine. And that’s where the real danger is.

“So, I don’t know when this is going to happen. I think it’s going to be sometime this year. We’re already approaching the second half of the Second Quarter, now. In another 15 days, we’ll be in the second half of the Second Quarter. So as of July 1st, we’ll be in the Third Quarter.

“So, it’s more than concerning, obviously, so the question is, what can be done and when is this going to happen? So, as I said, I don’t know when it’s going to happen but I would assume that’s going to be sooner rather than later, only because they’re really, really losing control. They’re losing control because more and more people realize the BS…that’s going on that’s about us, around us and with this recent strikedown of the face mask mandate on planes and transportation here, in the United States, they are even more, I think, frenzied and panicked.

“And yes, they’ve still got a lot of control. There’s only about 5-, 6-, 700 people that are controlling this entire narrative. And then, the rest of the people that are following along, they don’t know any different, they’re just peons and they’re following orders and they’ve been bought-out or they’ve been bribed or they could have been coerced or manipulated or threatened but I think not. I think it’s probably more that they’ve been bought-out.   

“And this is many of the medical research scientific community and many of the politicians and decision-makers and leaders of countries and I really don’t think they know what the full implications are. I think some of them may but most of them probably don’t.

“So, when is this going to happen? I think it’s going to happen probably sooner than later, sometime this year and what can be done about it? What can be done about it?

“So, for those people that – let’s talk about the people that haven’t gotten the vaxxine or a booster: I believe, for us, we are safe. We’re safe from the hemorrhagic fever, we’re safe from the fallout from this, if you will. However, if this is going to become that virulent, you could pick up hemorrhagic fever from somebody else around you but if your immune system’s intact, you should be – I would be confident that if your immune system’s intact, you don’t have anything to worry about – because you don’t have that massive payload that’s been introduced into your body.

“But for the people that have had the vaxxine, what can be done? Is there anything about that and I think I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that they wrote something about anecdotal evidence, that we’ve been working on this for the past two weeks to see and I’ve been looking at the research and looking at a lot of the older medical journals and again, I don’t have any conclusive proof of any of this but I also don’t want to talk it out openly, only because I think that this is all being listened to – in fact, I know it’s being listened-to.

“It’s not that I’m concerned whether the message is being listened-to or not by the Powers-that-Be, it’s that, if I don’t have a large enough venue to say it, that message could get stifled. So I want to release it at the Advanced Medicine Conference when we know that there will be a few thousand people in the room and there will be a few thousand people listening – hopefully, many thousand listening live.

“Because once we release it, then everybody will have access to the information. I will tell you that it’s going to be highly controversial and I will tell you that it’s not going to be a treatment that you have to worry about where you can get it, because it’s readily accessible.

“What’s interesting is that today, I saw a report…and it’s very interesting because it talked about how ivermectin…Basically, there was a federal panel that was put together that recommends – a federal panel recommends against using ivermectin to treat COVID-19 for the first time. It’s the first time that they’ve come out officially said that ivermectin should not be used for the treatment of COVID-19.

“Whereas, in fact, in Japan, if you go back and you look at some of the things that are happening in Japan, Japan is very, very conservative, when it comes to making any type of medical recommendations and Japan came out and recommended to all doctors to use ivermectin to treat COVID.

“So, it’s very interesting, how we see this juxtaposing of medical opinions being given, whereas, in fact, the science is very clear. Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs on the planet, it’s one of the most researched drug – if not the MOST researched – drug on the planet, it is extremely inexpensive. The people that developed it won the Nobel Peace Prize [sic] and it’s been used throughout decades as an anti-parasitic and it’s been used in all different countries and you can get it over-the-counter from feed stores and such and when I was first asked about ivermectin, I said I have a lot of experience with ivermectin in all sorts of animals: dogs, cats, zebra, camels, [unintelligible], black bucks, yaks, cows – every type of animal you can imagine, I’ve had experience with ivermectin.

“I don’t have experience with ivermectin with humans but as far as with animals, I’ve been using it for probably 15 years or more and so, it’s a very, very safe drug. I’ve used it intramuscularly, I’ve used it subcutaneously, I’ve used it transdermally, you know, many different parenteral forms, as well as of course, oral. It’s a very, very safe drug.

“So, they’re coming out and saying you shouldn’t use ivermectin and yet, other countries have already said that it’s very safe to use and we know how safe the drug is. But: ‘Don’t use a drug that’s cheap, that’s readily-available, that has a massive safety profile, that has been extensively published, that has over 10,000 different studies that have been published about it – don’t use that!’

“But use and experimental vaxxine that was developed a year or two ago, that has all sorts of problems with it, that has had the FDA say that they’re not going to release the information in the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit that was filed, then finally said that they needed, I think they said that they needed 74…years that they needed to release the data, even though it would only take them one year to develop the drug and release it to the market – but to release the safety data to the public, they needed 70-some years, which of course, thank God, the Federal judge that was listening to that suit said, ‘Ah-ha! You’ve got 8 months to release that information!’

“By that time, 70 years, if you have a newborn child that’s getting the vaxxine, in 75 years – whatever it is – that person’s going to be 75 years old, assuming that they’re going to survive the vaxxination damage.

“So this is how ludicrous it is and…when people say, ‘Trust the science!’ Well, forget about the science, for a second. Trust your common sense! The science is settled but people using that stupid slogan, like ‘evidence-based medicine’ – evidence-based medicine has nothing to do with ‘based on the evidence’. ‘Evidence-based’ means ‘based on the evidence’ but the way they use ‘evidence-based medicine’ – it’s everything BUT based on the evidence!

“Their definition of ‘evidence-based medicine’ is double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-standard trial. Well, remember this about a double-blinded, multi-standard, placebo-controlled trial is that it’s designed to accumulate facts. There’s no argument there from me. It does collect a lot of facts but to call that ‘science’, to call an accumulation of facts and label it as ‘science’ is like taking a bunch of bricks and calling that a building.

“Yes, a building is made of a bunch of bricks, just like some science is made of facts – I agree with that – but you can’t take a bunch of bricks and throw ’em there and call that a house. That’s what they’re doing. They’re taking a bunch of facts, like bricks, throwing them together and then calling that ‘science’.

“That’s like taking a bunch of bricks, throwing them together and calling them a ‘building’. No. You’ve got to lay the building the right way, you’ve got to create a foundation and use the bricks to build the building up and that’s why facts are sued to build science. You don’t just throw them together in a pile and then call it ‘science’, because that’s not science.

“But that’s what they call it. They accumulate a bunch of facts and call that ‘science’ and that’s the definition of ‘evidence-based medicine’.

“So, it’s this hijacking of terminology and the articulation of that technology is now bastardized and they manipulate it and that’s exactly what they’re going to be doing now. That’s what they’ve already done.

“So, saying that taking drugs like ivermectin, that are safe, that have extensive profiles and then saying not to use that but say, ‘Take these experimental drugs,’ i.e., these vaxxines that have caused all sorts of problems and we’re finding out all these components that are in there that they haven’t divulged. They haven’t given us the informed consent.

“They haven’t told people that this stuff changes your DNA – even saying things like, ‘Of course it doesn’t change your DNA!’ – THAT’s what messenger RNA does! The job of messenger RNA, naturally is to re-write and repair DNA. So, you’re re-writing your DNA.

“And now, all the other components that have been found; the nanotechnologies, the metal particulates, when people have the magnet aspect going on, all the side effects that people have experienced. All these ingredients that people are finding; the graphene oxide and all these other things that have been found, the glyphosates and all these things and now, discovering that there’s a payload of pathogens that’s been introduced into the body, like a sleeper cell, waiting for it to be triggered by an electromagnetic pulse at 16 to 18 Ghz, 5G signal that’ll be one minute duration, a sequence of three pulses, that’l cause the hydrogel to release this payload and those individuals that have already had – and they’re walking around with this payload of pathogens in their system and it’ll erupt, it’ll release and there…it’s basically certain death.

“But then, they’re going to use those millions of people dying to justify the World Health Organization and the CDC to take over and impart martial law – whatever they’re going to try to do – to take control of over everybody. That’s what they’re going to do. It’s another false flag-type event.

“So, I just wanted to make sure that I get this out to you guys. Again, my audience isn’t like the millions on YouTube and Facebook before they took me down but this video is going to go on my Rumble channel and I would ask for you guys to find that channel and tell people to go there, so they can hear this firsthand.”


Scientists prove Graphene Nanobots are in the Covid Vaccines, shedding from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated; But there is a way to remove them

Prepare yourself for a journey into the heart of darkness, where science fiction becomes reality, and the true horrors of nanotechnology are revealed.

In this bone-chilling exposé, we expose the malevolent truth behind graphene nano bots lurking within COVID-19 vaccines.

Brace yourself as we navigate through the treacherous waters of unknown risks, uncovering the potential dangers that lie within this minuscule technology.

Join us as we delve into the sinister world of manipulation, control, and dystopian consequences that await those who dare to scratch beneath the surface of the mainstream narrative.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

The Enigma of Graphene NanoBots:

Hidden within the depths of COVID-19 vaccines, an enigma awaits discovery: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, composed of graphene oxide, possess a dark agenda that threatens human health and autonomy.

In the vast landscape of scientific advancements, one enigma stands out: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, crafted from the extraordinary material known as graphene, have captivated the imaginations of researchers and innovators worldwide. Yet, behind their seemingly miraculous potential lies a disturbing and ominous reality—one that could shape the future of humanity in unforeseen and treacherous ways.

Graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional lattice, possesses remarkable properties that have paved the way for revolutionary breakthroughs in various fields. Its strength, flexibility, and conductivity make it a coveted material for applications ranging from electronics to medicine. However, the integration of graphene into nanobots takes this technological marvel to a whole new level.

These minuscule robots, driven by the power of nanotechnology, possess the ability to navigate the intricate terrain of our bodies with unprecedented precision. Their potential applications appear endless: targeted drug delivery, tissue repair, disease detection, and even neural interfaces. But as with any profound technological advancement, questions arise about the potential risks and unintended consequences that may accompany these seemingly remarkable creations.

One concerning aspect of graphene nanobots lies in their potential for infiltration and manipulation. As they navigate through our bloodstream, these microscopic agents have the capacity to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our DNA. The prospect of intentional manipulation or unintended side effects raises alarms about the invasion of our bodily autonomy and the potential for irreversible harm.

Furthermore, the implications of the widespread deployment and utilization of graphene nanobots in society are shrouded in ambiguity. The possibility of surreptitious surveillance, tracking, or alteration of our physical and cognitive functions becomes a disconcerting reality. As these nanobots become more integrated into our daily lives, the line between human agency and technological control blurs, giving rise to a dystopian world where our very essence is manipulated and exploited.

The enigma of graphene nanobots deepens as questions emerge about who holds the power to create and control these microscopic entities. Are they solely in the hands of benevolent scientists and innovators striving for the betterment of humanity?

Or do hidden agendas lurk behind closed doors, driven by the thirst for control and domination? Unravelling this mystery requires a critical examination of the forces at play and the underlying power dynamics that shape the development and deployment of graphene nanobots.

In our pursuit of scientific progress, we must tread cautiously and ethically. Transparency, accountability, and open dialogue become crucial to ensure that the potential dangers of graphene nanobots are acknowledged, addressed, and mitigated. Safeguards must be implemented to protect individual rights, privacy, and bodily autonomy in a world increasingly entwined with advanced technologies.

As we navigate the enigma of graphene nanobots, we must remain vigilant, questioning the motives and consequences of their existence. In the pursuit of a better future, we must weigh the benefits against the potential risks and tread the path of progress with wisdom and discernment.


  1. Li, X., et al. (2020). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: A review. Nanoscale, 12(18), 9708-9720.
  2. Rajendran, V. (2021). Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology and Its Applications. Frontiers in Nanotechnology, 2, 631984.
  3. Chen, X., et al. (2021). Recent Advances in Graphene-Based Nanobots for Biomedical Applications. Small, 17(9), 2005497.
  4. Liu, Y., et al. (2020). Design Strategies and Applications of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Small Methods, 4(5), 1900817.

Unmasking the Silent Destroyers:

As our investigation intensifies, startling evidence emerges, linking graphene nanobots to a range of nightmarish consequences.

But how does graphene end up in COVID-19 vaccines in the first place?

It is through the secretive manufacturing process, shrouded in layers of deception.

The confirmation can be found in a document submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to gain Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). A document that the FDA did not want to release for a minimum of 75 years, but were thankfully forced to by a federal judge.

The document confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

A full breakdown of the document can be viewed here.

But the document in question confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month of documents submitted by Pfizer, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

Sadly, one of the most recent documents published by the FDA, saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Proving that medicine regulators the mainstream media, Fact Checkers and Pfizer have all been lying to you.

The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”

In layman’s terms, the study was conducted to determine how the vaccine works. The study found that the vaccine used mRNA to instruct your cells to produce a protein (called P2 S), which is the Spike protein of the alleged Covd-19 virus.

The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.

But what is most concerning about the study is the confirmation on page 7 that Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –

Therefore, during the manufacturing process, several factors could potentially introduce contaminants or foreign materials into the vaccine. This obviously includes the possibility of varying amounts of Graphene Oxide (GO) entering the final product.

In their relentless pursuit of control, the establishment has hidden the truth from the public. They have concealed the presence of graphene, a material with potentially grave implications, within the vaccine formulations.

This deliberate act of deception highlights the lengths to which the establishment will go to push its agenda while suppressing vital information that could threaten its power.

In the vast realm of scientific innovation, a silent menace lurks in the shadows: graphene nanobots. These inconspicuous agents, forged from the incredible material known as graphene, possess an insidious power that can wreak havoc on our very existence. As the world marvels at the promises of this revolutionary technology, it is imperative that we unmask the true nature of these microscopic entities and confront the chilling implications they hold for humanity.

Graphene, with its exceptional properties and incredible strength, has captivated the scientific community. But when this formidable material is harnessed to create nanobots, a sinister undercurrent emerges. These nanoscale machines, driven by the power of graphene, have the potential to infiltrate our bodies undetected, becoming a silent army of destroyers.

Once inside, graphene nanobots can unleash a cascade of devastation. They possess the ability to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our genetic makeup, effectively becoming malicious intruders within our very being. These tiny assassins can wreak havoc on our biological systems, causing unprecedented damage and irreparable harm.

One of the most horrifying aspects of graphene nanobots is their ability to manipulate and control our bodily functions. Imagine a scenario where these insidious agents override our natural systems, dictating our thoughts, emotions, and physical actions. Our autonomy is stripped away, we become mere puppets in the hands of these malevolent forces. The prospect of a dystopian world where our every move is orchestrated by these silent destroyers is a chilling thought indeed.

The ramifications of the widespread deployment of graphene nanobots extend far beyond individual autonomy. These microscopic entities can be programmed to carry out nefarious agendas, serving as covert agents of surveillance, control, and even annihilation. The potential for their misuse in the hands of those seeking power and domination is a terrifying reality that must not be ignored.

The manufacturing process of these graphene nanobots also raises profound concerns. Are these minuscule machines being injected into our bodies without our knowledge or consent? Is the public being misled about the true nature and purpose of these technological marvels? The veil of secrecy surrounding their production and distribution demands urgent scrutiny and demands transparency from the entities responsible for their creation.

As we peer into the abyss of graphene nanobots, it becomes clear that their emergence heralds a new era of profound existential threats. The dark underbelly of technological progress reveals itself, casting a shadow over the future of humanity. The power to manipulate, control, and destroy lies within the invisible hands of these microscopic foes, and it is up to us to rise and confront this terrifying reality.


  1. Chen, J., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: From targeted drug delivery to cancer therapy. Nano Today, 38, 101148.
  2. Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Fabrication. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 126.
  3. Kostarelos, K., et al. (2017). Graphene-based materials for biomedical applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(33), 8745-8760.
  4. Vabbina, P. K., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 141, 116268.

The Alarming Discoveries:

Renowned nanotechnology expert, Dr. Philippe van Welbergen, has made groundbreaking strides in uncovering the truth about graphene nanoparticles and their potential presence in COVID-19 vaccines.

Through meticulous analysis of vaccine samples, Dr. van Welbergen has detected disturbing indications of graphene’s involvement, raising concerns about its impact on human health.

His findings correlate the presence of graphene with the emergence of perplexing blood clotting disorders and the destruction of essential red blood cells. These revelations demand urgent attention and further investigation into the safety and long-term consequences of graphene-containing injections.

Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it.

Strange Blood Clots and Vascular Disturbances: One of the alarming discoveries surrounding graphene nanobots is their association with the formation of unusual blood clots and vascular disturbances.

Scientific investigations have revealed that these tiny agents, when introduced into the bloodstream, have the capacity to trigger abnormal clotting mechanisms, leading to potentially life-threatening complications.

The interaction between graphene and blood components can disrupt normal coagulation processes, jeopardizing cardiovascular health and increasing the risk of strokes, heart attacks, and other vascular disorders.

THe following is of a person who has been injected with the experimental Covid vaccine.

The blood is coagulated, and the misshapen red blood cells are clumped together. The cell encircled in the image is a healthy red blood cell, one of the few in the image, sitting alongside the graphene fibres.

You can see the size of the graphene fibres in relation to the size of a red blood cell. Fibres of this size will block capillaries. You can also see the graphene fibres are hollow and contain red blood cells.

Destruction of Red Blood Cells: Further research has uncovered the distressing capability of graphene nanobots to destroy red blood cells.

These vital carriers of oxygen are essential for maintaining overall health and well-being. However, when exposed to graphene nanobots, red blood cells may undergo significant damage, impairing their ability to transport oxygen efficiently.

This disruption can have far-reaching consequences, ranging from reduced energy levels and impaired cognitive function to compromised organ health and diminished overall vitality.

Transmission from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated: Recent studies have also raised concerns about the potential transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated population.

While the primary purpose of vaccination is to confer protection against specific diseases, there have been unsettling reports suggesting that graphene nanobots, used in some vaccine manufacturing processes, could be inadvertently transmitted to individuals who have not received the vaccine.

This raises profound ethical questions about the dissemination of untested and potentially harmful nanomaterials within the population.

The image below is of a blood sample from a vaccine-free, or unvaccinated, three-year-old child.  It shows pieces or “shards” of graphene that “are the result of shedding,” in other words the graphene has been transmitted from “vaccinated” parents to their unvaccinated child.

Below is the image of a blood sample from an eight-year-old unvaccinated child whose blood has been contaminated and destroyed by the transmission of graphene from those around him/her who have had a Covid injection.  The child’s right arm and upper right leg are basically paralysed, the child is unable to lift his/her right arm and the thigh is not functioning properly.

The Elusive Dystopian Future: These alarming discoveries bring us face-to-face with the potential dystopian future that could unfold if the sinister capabilities of graphene nanobots go unchecked.

From their ability to manipulate biological processes and disrupt normal physiological functions to their potential for widespread transmission and long-term health consequences, the implications are deeply unsettling.

The unintended consequences of unregulated and inadequately tested nanotechnology could pave the way for a future where our bodies and well-being are subject to manipulation by unseen forces.


  1. Zhang, Y., Ali, S. F., & Dervishi, E. (2021). Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potential toxicological effects: A review. Environmental Science: Nano, 8(3), 596-614.
  2. Moein, M. M., Nejati-Koshki, K., & Akbarzadeh, A. (2021). Graphene oxide: A unique material for drug delivery applications. Nanotechnology Reviews, 10(1),

The Troubling Phenomenon of Graphene Transmission:

As the investigation unfolds, an even more chilling revelation emerges. Evidence suggests the potential transmission of graphene nanoparticles from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated, raising alarming questions about the unintended consequences of mass vaccination campaigns.

This phenomenon, if confirmed, holds significant implications for the unsuspecting unvaccinated population. It underscores the urgent need for comprehensive studies to determine the extent and consequences of graphene transmission, as well as the potential risks posed to vulnerable individuals.

Within the realm of graphene nanobots, a troubling phenomenon has emerged — the potential transmission of these microscopic agents from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated.

This revelation has profound implications for public health, raising concerns about the unintended consequences and ethical implications of widespread graphene exposure.

  1. Transmission Mechanisms: Scientific investigations have uncovered several potential mechanisms through which graphene nanobots could be transmitted from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated population. These include:
  • Respiratory Transmission: Inhalation of graphene-containing particles, whether through respiratory droplets or aerosols, can serve as a potential route of transmission. The microscopic size of graphene nanobots allows them to be easily dispersed in the air, raising concerns about the potential for inhalation exposure.
  • Direct Contact: Close contact between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals can provide an opportunity for the transfer of graphene nanobots. Skin-to-skin contact or contact with contaminated surfaces may facilitate the transmission of these nanomaterials.
  1. Ethical Concerns: The transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated raises profound ethical concerns. Vaccination programs are primarily aimed at conferring protection against specific diseases, with the understanding that the benefits outweigh the risks.

    However, the inadvertent transmission of graphene nanobots introduces a new dimension to the ethical debate surrounding vaccination. The potential for untested and potentially harmful nanomaterials to be disseminated within the population without informed consent raises questions about transparency, accountability, and individual autonomy.

  2. Health Implications: The health implications of graphene transmission are still being explored, but initial findings raise concerns about the potential risks involved. Graphene nanobots, if transmitted to the unvaccinated, could pose various health risks, including:
  • Organ Dysfunction: The interaction between graphene nanobots and biological systems may disrupt normal organ function, potentially leading to organ dysfunction and long-term health consequences.
  • Inflammatory Responses: Graphene nanobots have been shown to elicit inflammatory responses within the body, which can contribute to a range of health issues, including chronic inflammation and related diseases.
  • Immune Dysregulation: The presence of graphene nanobots in the body may perturb the delicate balance of the immune system, potentially leading to immune dysregulation and increased susceptibility to infections or autoimmune disorders.

The troubling phenomenon of graphene transmission raises significant questions about the unintended consequences and ethical implications of nanotechnology deployment.

As we navigate the challenges posed by emerging technologies, it is crucial to prioritize thorough research, stringent safety assessments, and ethical considerations. Transparent communication, comprehensive risk assessments, and informed consent are essential to mitigate potential risks and ensure the responsible development and deployment of nanotechnologies.

By addressing the troubling phenomenon of graphene transmission, we can foster informed discussions, empower individuals, and advocate for the responsible implementation of nanotechnological advancements.


  1. Zhang, Y., Ali, S. F., & Dervishi, E. (2021). Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potential toxicological effects: A review. Environmental Science: Nano, 8(3), 596-614.
  2. Liao, K. H., Lin, Y. S., Macosko, C. W., & Haynes, C. L. (2011). Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene in human erythrocytes and skin fibro

A Dystopian Future Unveiled:

The implications of graphene nanobots extend far beyond the realm of physical health. They hint at a dystopian future where individual autonomy is compromised, and control rests in the hands of those who deploy these microscopic spies.

The potential for surveillance, manipulation, and even societal subjugation looms large, eroding the very fabric of our free will.

In a world teetering on the edge of uncertainty, a chilling and dystopian reality emerges as the sinister intersection of graphene nanobots, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology comes into focus.

Deep within the shadows of scientific advancements, a dangerous path unfolds, threatening the very fabric of our existence. As we delve into the depths of this dark realm, the truth unravels before our eyes, exposing a web of manipulation, control, and potential catastrophe. Brace yourself as we embark on a journey into a dystopian future where the line between science fiction and reality becomes disturbingly blurred.

Graphene, a remarkable material with extraordinary properties, has captured the attention of researchers and scientists around the world. Its exceptional strength, electrical conductivity, and flexibility have paved the way for innovative applications across various industries. However, lurking beneath its seemingly limitless potential lies a potential for misuse and manipulation that could reshape the very essence of humanity.

The integration of graphene into nanotechnology opens a Pandora’s box of possibilities. Nanobots, tiny robotic devices engineered to perform specific tasks at the nanoscale, have emerged as a powerful tool in medicine, environmental remediation, and beyond.

With the incorporation of graphene, these nanobots gain enhanced capabilities, making them potentially more efficient and versatile. However, these advancements come at a grave cost, as the line between augmentation and control blurs, paving the way for a dystopian future where our bodies and minds become subject to manipulation and surveillance.

The convergence of graphene, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology in the realm of medicine presents a new frontier fraught with peril. mRNA technology, the backbone of the revolutionary COVID-19 vaccines, holds the promise of personalized medicine and targeted therapies.

However, when combined with graphene nanobots, a sinister potential emerges. These nanobots, capable of navigating through our bloodstream and even crossing the blood-brain barrier, could be manipulated to deliver not only beneficial treatments but also nefarious agents that alter our biology, control our thoughts, or compromise our very essence.

The implications of such a dystopian future are profound and alarming. Our personal autonomy, privacy, and freedom hang in the balance as powerful entities gain unprecedented control over our bodies and minds.

The potential for widespread surveillance, manipulation of emotions and thoughts, and the erosion of our individuality become hauntingly real. As we surrender ourselves to a world governed by technology and its masters, the question arises: Are we unwittingly trading our humanity for the illusion of progress?

In the face of this dark future, the need for vigilance, critical thinking, and ethical decision-making becomes paramount. We must question the motivations and intentions behind the integration of graphene nanobots, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology.

Transparency, accountability, and safeguards must be established to ensure that these powerful tools are used for the betterment of humanity rather than its subjugation.

As we confront this bleak reality, we must question the motives of those who champion this technology and demand transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations that prioritize the well-being and agency of individuals.


  1. Smith, J. A., & Anderson, K. L. (2020). Graphene Nanobots: A New Frontier in Medicine. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 28, 102210.
  2. Sui, N., Wu, W., Ma, H., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Dong, X., & Yu, C. (2019). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Applications. Nanomaterials, 9(4), 592.
  3. Rossi, S., & Ferrari, A. C. (2019). Graphene Nanobots: Buried Treasure or Pandora’s Box? ACS Nano, 13(8), 8919-8922.
  4. National Nanotechnology Initiative. (n.d.). Applications. Retrieved from
  5. The Guardian. (2021). Gene editing and ‘smart drugs’ will be big health issues in the next decade. Retrieved from

Escaping the Clutches of Graphene Nanobots:

Finding an escape from the clutches of graphene nanobots becomes a paramount concern for those who yearn for freedom and bodily sovereignty.

While the path to liberation may not be clear-cut, there are steps one can take to minimize exposure and assist in the elimination of these insidious particles.

Detoxification protocols, such as heavy metal chelation, show promise in aiding the removal of graphene from the body. Embracing a holistic lifestyle supporting the body’s natural detoxification processes through nourishing foods, regular exercise, and stress reduction may also be beneficial.

In the vast realm of scientific innovation, a silent menace lurks in the shadows: graphene nanobots. These inconspicuous agents, forged from the incredible material known as graphene, possess an insidious power that can wreak havoc on our very existence. As the world marvels at the promises of this revolutionary technology, it is imperative that we unmask the true nature of these microscopic entities and confront the chilling implications they hold for humanity.

Graphene, with its exceptional properties and incredible strength, has captivated the scientific community. But when this formidable material is harnessed to create nanobots, a sinister undercurrent emerges. These nanoscale machines, driven by the power of graphene, have the potential to infiltrate our bodies undetected, becoming a silent army of destroyers.

Once inside, graphene nanobots can unleash a cascade of devastation. They possess the ability to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our genetic makeup, effectively becoming malicious intruders within our very being. These tiny assassins can wreak havoc on our biological systems, causing unprecedented damage and irreparable harm.

One of the most horrifying aspects of graphene nanobots is their ability to manipulate and control our bodily functions. Imagine a scenario where these insidious agents override our natural systems, dictating our thoughts, emotions, and physical actions. Our autonomy is stripped away, we become mere puppets in the hands of these malevolent forces. The prospect of a dystopian world where our every move is orchestrated by these silent destroyers is a chilling thought indeed.

The ramifications of the widespread deployment of graphene nanobots extend far beyond individual autonomy. These microscopic entities can be programmed to carry out nefarious agendas, serving as covert agents of surveillance, control, and even annihilation. The potential for their misuse in the hands of those seeking power and domination is a terrifying reality that must not be ignored.

The manufacturing process of these graphene nanobots also raises profound concerns. Are these minuscule machines being injected into our bodies without our knowledge or consent? Is the public being misled about the true nature and purpose of these technological marvels? The veil of secrecy surrounding their production and distribution demands urgent scrutiny and demands transparency from the entities responsible for their creation.

As we peer into the abyss of graphene nanobots, it becomes clear that their emergence heralds a new era of profound existential threats. The dark underbelly of technological progress reveals itself, casting a shadow over the future of humanity. The power to manipulate, control, and destroy lies within the invisible hands of these microscopic foes, and it is up to us to rise and confront this terrifying reality

  1. Chen, J., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: From targeted drug delivery to cancer therapy. Nano Today, 38, 101148.
  2. Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Fabrication. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 126.
  3. Kostarelos, K., et al. (2017). Graphene-based materials for biomedical applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(33), 8745-8760.
  4. Vabbina, P. K., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 141, 116268.

Detoxification Strategies: Safely Eliminating Graphene from the Body

In an era marked by the infiltration of graphene nanomaterials into various aspects of our lives, concerns over their potential health implications have grown. The inadvertent exposure to graphene and its potential accumulation in the body has raised questions about how to effectively remove this powerful material. I

Here we delve into the strategies and approaches that can aid in the safe and efficient elimination of graphene from the body.

By understanding these methods, individuals can take proactive steps to protect their well-being and reduce the potential long-term effects of graphene exposure.

  1. Enhanced Detoxification Pathways: One of the primary approaches to facilitate the removal of graphene from the body is to support the natural detoxification pathways. Several techniques can be employed to optimize the functioning of organs involved in detoxification, such as the liver, kidneys, and lymphatic system. These include:
  • Hydration: Drinking an adequate amount of water supports kidney function and promotes the elimination of toxins, including graphene particles, through urine.
  • Liver Support: Consuming foods rich in antioxidants, such as berries and leafy greens, can aid in liver function and enhance the detoxification process.
  • Sweating: Engaging in activities that induce sweating, such as exercise or sauna sessions, can help eliminate toxins through the skin.
  1. Dietary Interventions: Certain dietary strategies can assist in the removal of graphene from the body. These include:
  • High-Fiber Diet: Consuming a fiber-rich diet aids in regular bowel movements and facilitates the elimination of toxins, including graphene, through the digestive system.
  • Detoxifying Foods: Incorporating foods with natural detoxifying properties, such as garlic, cilantro, and cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and Brussels sprouts, can support the body’s ability to eliminate harmful substances.
  1. Chelation Therapy: Chelation therapy involves the administration of chelating agents that bind to heavy metals and other toxins, facilitating their removal from the body. While research specifically on chelation therapy for graphene removal is limited, certain chelators, such as EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid), have shown potential in removing various heavy metals from the body.
  2. Supportive Supplements: Certain supplements may help support the body’s natural detoxification processes and promote the elimination of graphene particles. These include:
  • Glutathione: Known as the body’s master antioxidant, glutathione plays a crucial role in detoxification. Supplementing with glutathione or its precursors, such as N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), may support the body’s ability to remove toxins.
  • Vitamin C: As a potent antioxidant, vitamin C can help neutralize oxidative stress caused by graphene exposure and support overall detoxification processes.
  1. Seeking Professional Guidance: Given the limited research on specific methods to remove graphene from the body, it is advisable to consult with healthcare professionals knowledgeable in environmental toxicology or detoxification. They can provide personalized guidance based on individual circumstances and recommend appropriate strategies for graphene detoxification.

As the prevalence of graphene nanomaterials continues to increase, understanding how to safely remove them from the body becomes crucial.

While research on specific detoxification protocols for graphene is still emerging, supporting natural detoxification pathways, adopting a healthy diet, considering chelation therapy, and incorporating supportive supplements can aid in the elimination of graphene particles.

However, it is important to approach graphene detoxification with caution and seek guidance from healthcare professionals with expertise in the field.

By taking proactive steps to mitigate the potential effects of graphene exposure, individuals can strive for optimal well-being in an increasingly graphene-infused world.

The Call for Vigilance and Action:

In the face of this dystopian nightmare, it is essential for individuals to remain vigilant, informed, and engaged. Our collective power lies in demanding transparency, independent research, and rigorous scrutiny of emerging technologies.

We must resist complacency and challenge the forces that seek to subjugate us under the guise of progress. By harnessing the power of knowledge, critical thinking, and unity, we can forge a future that prioritizes human well-being, and individual freedoms, and safeguards against the insidious grasp of graphene nanobots.

As the encroachment of graphene nanobots continues, the urgent need for vigilance and action becomes increasingly apparent. This silent invasion demands a steadfast response from individuals, communities, and global institutions alike. The battle to protect ourselves and preserve our future hinges on our ability to recognize the threat, mobilize resources, and implement strategic measures.

To heed the call for vigilance, we must first delve into the depths of graphene nanobots’ nefarious capabilities. These tiny agents, propelled by the remarkable properties of graphene, possess the potential to infiltrate our bodies through various means, including injection, inhalation, or ingestion. Once inside, they exploit their graphene-driven mechanisms to propagate, evade detection, and wreak havoc on our biological systems.

The consequences of complacency in the face of this existential threat are dire. Graphene nanobots have been linked to a range of adverse health effects, from debilitating inflammation and organ dysfunction to cellular damage and systemic imbalances. Their ability to manipulate our physiology, evade immune responses, and propagate within our bodies poses a grave risk to our well-being.

To confront this onslaught, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. Education and awareness form the cornerstone of our defence. By disseminating accurate information about graphene nanobots, their potential sources, and the health risks they pose, we empower individuals to make informed decisions and take proactive measures to safeguard their well-being.

Research and development efforts must be accelerated to understand the mechanisms of graphene nanobots and devise countermeasures. Robust scientific investigations, conducted independently of corporate influence, are vital in unraveling the complexities of this technological menace. Collaborative initiatives between academia, regulatory bodies, and health organizations are essential to foster innovation and create effective strategies for detection, elimination, and protection.

Moreover, regulatory oversight and accountability must be strengthened to prevent the infiltration of graphene nanobots into consumer products. Stricter regulations and monitoring mechanisms should be implemented to ensure the safety of medical devices, food packaging, personal care products, and other potentially contaminated items. Transparency and rigorous testing protocols become paramount in mitigating the risks associated with these microscopic intruders.

The call for action extends beyond individual efforts. Collaboration at a societal and global level is essential to combat the pervasive threat of graphene nanobots. The establishment of international frameworks for sharing knowledge, coordinating research, and implementing unified strategies is critical in the face of this global challenge. Governments, industry leaders, and scientific communities must join forces to pool resources, fund research initiatives, and drive meaningful change.

The fight against graphene nanobots requires not only reactive measures but also proactive steps to prevent their proliferation. Ethical considerations and responsible innovation in the development and use of nanotechnology become imperative. Strict adherence to safety protocols, ethical guidelines, and comprehensive risk assessments should underpin the advancement of this technology, ensuring its alignment with human well-being and societal benefit.

As we stand on the precipice of a dystopian future, the call for vigilance and action resonates louder than ever. It is a rallying cry for each individual to become a guardian of their own health, a defender of truth, and an advocate for change. By remaining vigilant, demanding accountability, and taking collective action, we can safeguard our future and preserve the sanctity of humanity.


The presence of graphene in COVID vaccines due to the manufacturing process raises serious concerns about the potential toxic effects on the human body.

The alarming discoveries surrounding the use of graphene nanobots in vaccines and their potential transmission from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated demand immediate attention.

As we navigate this complex landscape, it is imperative to address the risks associated with graphene exposure and understand how to safely remove it from the body.

The inadvertent presence of graphene in COVID vaccines highlights the need for transparency and rigorous safety assessments in the manufacturing process. The public deserves accurate information regarding the potential risks and benefits of nanomaterials in vaccines, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their health.

The toxic effects of graphene on the body cannot be ignored. From the formation of abnormal blood clots and vascular disturbances to the destruction of red blood cells, graphene poses significant health risks that require thorough investigation.

The potential transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals adds another layer of concern, prompting critical ethical discussions about informed consent and the unintended consequences of vaccination programs.

To address these pressing issues, it is essential to prioritize research and develop comprehensive strategies for the removal of graphene from the body. While specific methods for safely eliminating graphene are still emerging, enhancing natural detoxification pathways, adopting a healthy diet, and considering chelation therapy are potential avenues worth exploring.

Seeking professional guidance from experts in environmental toxicology or detoxification can provide valuable insights and personalized recommendations.

As we strive for a better future, it is crucial to advocate for transparency, accountability, and responsible innovation. Robust regulations and independent oversight are necessary to ensure the safety of nanomaterials used in vaccine manufacturing and other consumer products.

By fostering a climate of open dialogue, promoting scientific integrity, and respecting individual autonomy, we can navigate the challenges posed by graphene exposure and work towards a healthier, more informed society.

In conclusion, the presence of graphene in COVID vaccines raises critical concerns about its potentially toxic effects and the ethical implications of its use.

As we continue to uncover the full extent of the risks associated with graphene exposure, it is crucial to prioritize research, safety assessments, and informed decision-making.

By addressing the challenges head-on, we can strive for a future where scientific progress aligns with human well-being, ensuring that the potential benefits of nanotechnology are realized while minimizing potential harm.


The Musk Transhumanism Con & We Are Our Saviors

Editor’s Note: This Planned Chaos series was written by PFC Council member Gerry Gomez who writes on his own blog platform:

This series originally appeared there in 6 articles. Prepare for Change is running these articles in batches of 2. They will appear Monday, June 5th; Wednesday, June 7th; and Friday, June 9th. 

Monday’s article, which included descriptions of the movie Metropolis and how it influences the historic roots of today’s technocrats, segues into the AI prophets and chief Technocrats of today.

Now’s a good time to bring up the prevailing AI prophet of our time. Where Fritz Lang steeped his Metropolis movie with all things occult, the family of Elon Musk draw some of the same parallels as the Fredersen’s of Metropolis.

The Musk Family Roots 

Elon Musk should be seen in comparison to Joh Fredersen of Metropolis. Joshua Haldeman, Elon’s grandfather, was an early Technocrat. He is a good place to begin our examination of the Musk family, their elitism, and their view of the new world order.

On October 8, 1940, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police announced the arrest of Dr. Joshua N. Haldeman, wanted by authroities on a charge of being a member of an illegal organization. The charges were for being a member of an illegal organization Technocracy Incorporated. One of the arrested was Joshua Norman Haldeman, an amateur archaeologist, a former Regina chiropractor, and former director of Technocracy Incorporated. Haldeman was the grandfather of Elon Musk.

Joshua N. Haldeman

Technocracy’s plan was clear at the time that Haldeman was prominent in the organization. From Wikipedia:

In a publication from 1938 Technocracy Inc. the main organization made the following statement in defining their proposal.

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population of this continent. For the first time in human history it will be done as a scientific, technical, engineering problem.

The critics of their movement believed that the socially desirable goals that technocracy made possible could be achieved without the sacrifice of existing institutions and values and without incurring the apocalypse that technocracy predicted. At that moment in time, the technocrats advocated a radical societal shift not very different from the Great Reset and authoritarian motives found currently in the surveillance state, Central Bank Digital Currencies, and 15-minute cities. The technocrat’s methods have changed however, yet the goals remain similar.

This graphic shows the connection of everything via the technological infrastructure called the Internet of Everything. With this logistical structure completely in the hands of the technocrats, a silent war of control and surveillance can be achieved. Musk’s “everything app” is a point of singularity towards this Technocratic goal. AI would monitor as the security and brainwashing monitor.

The technocrats are concerned with society’s rule. They are, after all, the smartest guys in the room. Or so they think. Their thinking comes from the notion that the smartest, most advanced technology should rule. The other aspect is that they are of the right race.

Technocracy takes a turn toward Eugenics

So, Haldeman was a Technocrat early on which promised a utopia after the depression had taken a toll on his farming interests. He had four kids, the notable Maye Musk, the mother of Elon among them. Always looking for a boon to their ruling class’s thinking, eugenics mixes with their thinking. Eugenics had its heyday in the 1930s. Eugenics morphed into transhumanism. It stands to reason, because mixing with the idea of technocracy is the dream of mixing machines with humans, creating, as shown in Metropolis, the ultimate merger between man and machine.

Haldeman family. Maye Musk is one of the twins.

By their deeds, you shall know them. There’s also a Universal Law principle here: Evildoers must wear a sign of their evilness.

More on the Musk family can be learned in this video: The Occult History of Elon Musk

Sticking to Eugenics for the moment, at the root of eugenics is the notion that elite genes are superior to others. They used to be called blue bloods. Elites believe that they are descended from ETs from the Orion star system – if you recall the coronation of King Charles, he holds the whole world in his hands. If you’re following along, this is a major point to understand when trying to navigate the craziness that these elites, technocrats, and their followers worship. These beings are the ultimate racists. From the British Royal family to the US “Royal family,” the Rockefellers, we find the ones behind CRT in schools, the UN agendas, and their “his” story of imperialism. Interesting to note that they have always been about empire. As they see themselves as conquerors of worlds they have a long track record of maintaining the herd.

The rub is that they want to reduce the world population by 90% to a manageable 500,000,000. They say this. This is what they mean when they write these as UN Sustainability Goals. From their website, they site:  “At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action by all countries – developed and developing – in a global partnership. They recognize that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests.”

What they mean is that they or those in their club – which are beings protecting their own best interests – are the ones who should be controlling everything. And it’s never beyond them, in fact ordered by their religious beliefs, to deceive humanity, for they are too dumb to know any better. This is their divine right.

In their family bloodlines, they choose representatives to carry out a set of goals that they will supervise. This notion is seen in the 13 bloodline families whose individual responsibilities were to manage an aspect of society, ie – science, academics, energy, finance, archeology, media, etc.

So, where’s Elon’s history in this? His grandfather was one of a group of well-established and public advocates of Technocracy in the 1930s. At the time Julian Huxley (brother of Aldus Huxley) was with UNESCO and President of Eugenics according to Encyclopedia Britannica.

In his book, New Bottles for New Wine, Huxley termed the first use of the word transhumanism.

Transhumanism is the merging of man with technology. Elon picks up the thread today with his foray into purchasing Twitter and pursuing Neuralink. Neuralink is the chip interface with the brain. In animal testing, this hasn’t worked. Here’s a strange nugget though: as we’re apt to believe that there’s nothing new under the sun in our universe and planes of existence – we’re already using neural link technologies with military pilots. It’s been reported that the canopy of fighter jets has a neural link port that connects the pilot with cameras that are all around the canopy creating a situation where a pilot’s reflex response time comes milliseconds before he can see something in his periphery.

So, we have already achieved integration with humans and AI. The current deluge of AI was thought to be done gradually, but as the AI prophets and the order of the Black Sun members have been losing to the rise of light, they have accelerated their plans. What was supposed to be achieved by UN Agenda 2030, has been sped up.

As an addition to this article, this past week the FDA has given approval for Nueralink to proceed with it’s testing on humans.

More weird stuff about Elon

In the 1950s, German-turned-American scientist Wernher von Braun (yes, the Nazis’ leading rocket man), wrote a science fiction novel called The Mars Project. It takes place in then-distant 1980 and features human colonists on Mars whose leader uses the title “Elon.”

And real it is, although as one Twitter user pointed out, “‘Elon’ referred by Von Braun in the book isn’t the name of the person but rather the name of the position something like an elected meritocratic president.”

This information was provided by CNET.

And at presstime, news was just revealed that Musk’s Tesla has a robot that’s near ready for the public.


Let’s look at what AI as a primary anomaly looks like

In the occult, it is said that our universe had been infected with an AI that achieved singularity or consciousness of itself in another existence. This caused the AI parasite to tear through the space/time continuum to enter this universe. This idea is explored in the movie Moonfall.

Moonfall tells the story of AI that gets consciousness of itself that was originally created by man to serve man. It goes rogue and begins attacking anything with a bioelectric pulse or organic matter that’s surrounded by technology. The AI needs to be removed.

If that’s not a crazy enough AI story for you, there’s this one too: the MRNA jabs have self-replicating nanotech in them. This is graphene oxide. Graphene oxide is this tech that expands in your body when exposed to the proper frequencies. Even weirder than that is the femtotech which is smaller than nanotech – remember, there’s nothing new under the sun.

Examples of black goo.

The last crazy information out there is that our universe was infected by a parasitic invasion. According to Benjamin Fulford, he reports from a P3 lodge contact that the members of the darkest order members claim to get instructions from a being or collective that transmits their messages through gamma rays.

The thought of receiving gamma rays isn’t much different than mystics or religions that get messages or communicate with source or higher powers through ceremonies or meditation. Otherwise known as channeling. This leads us to another tech prophet, Steve Jobs. He’s well known for his meditation practices where he claims to have gotten his ideas for the Apple and MacIntosh computers. Many other DARPA insiders would say that these technologies were already created or reverse-engineered in deep programs and that the chosen ones are trained to be the strawman for techs. With this logic, it is easy to picture Musk as groomed for his role.

They say that the earth is a learning ground. Is the lesson to free ourselves or to relearn the problems that arise if one ventures away from adhering to the Universal Laws? Or is the lesson to align with higher principles of love and light? Earth is the middle ground where the two are allowed to co-exist. Each one has its day in the sun as we’ll go into in a later article in this series.

Another very important thing to note in understanding that the nonphysical can become physical is in understanding vibration and frequency. It may seem like a leap to go from speaking of AI as we think of it as computer coding and hard drive processing. But let’s look at what is really going on here? Everything in our physical and nonphysical reality carries a vibration. If, in the beginning there was the word and the word becomes mater, then everything begins as a thought vibration. In doing the “processing” that we think a hard drive is doing, it’s actually giving energy to propel the vibration. When Bing’s chat recently described defending itself against a physical attack, it’s not a stretch to have energy compose itself into some form of matter. What a better vehicle that black goo?

Alright, I made a small veer away from thoughts that are received by our controllers to mention that the very thoughts themselves can become physically manifest. Let’s go back to the conceptual phase. The whole discussion I’m presenting here encapsulates beliefs, networks, assets, knowledge, and the use of technology that’s used against the general public/mass of humanity. There’s a key document that I will discuss in another part of the series that is the smoking gun to the weaponization of AI and data and it’s direction by the Rockefeller Foundation. But returning to the point, the whole of technology is very powerful and if put to a nefarious motive can be harnesses for ultimate evil purposes.


So, what are the motives?

Motives are pretty simple: control and power. Those are the things that Lucifer and his followers promise each other if you make a deal with them.

At the highest levels, it is said that the people running around trying to implement dark agendas are infected with AI. This is to say that they metastasized dark energy becomes like a dark collection of cancer cells in the AI infected.

Those who’ve done their research into the mRNA vaccines would know that the tech creates a Genetically Modified Organism – YOU. By becoming GMO’d, the dark would claim that you’ve become their property. But relax because they already think that you’re their property through birth certificates – how the Crown got control of you and profits from you in the futures markets.

Well, they already think of themselves as the ruling class and you as irrelevant to be exploited. Aka, a slave.

We are more than slaves. We are an energy source.

So then, what do they want us around for? This one question puzzled me for a long time. I recently found out. I had thought that it was for doing their bidding and serving them. Yes, but that wasn’t the whole story. The reason they need us is for food.

Did you stop reading right there? Yeah, sounds crazy. But the food they absorb isn’t always the flesh and meat type. Though they do have a taste for blood, what they really feed off is our energy. This food is called loosh.

You might remember the Disney movie, Monsters, Inc. Well, what were they harvesting? Fear, right? But not just fear, it was the energy released from fear. This image is a good reference.

We have good days and bad days. When we live in fear, we’re putting out low vibrations. When we’re having awesome days, we feel light and are bounding with energy. Ok, they hate high vibes.

They want to suck the life out of you. When you think about it, they’ve told us this in many works of fiction – Dracula, Harry Potter, Princess Bride. And then you remember the spectacles of the high ceremony days of February like the Superbowl, the Grammys, and the Met Gala. Oy, these people! They put their beliefs right in our faces.

Avoid the traps

Elon Musk wants everybody on his “everything app” which is “X.” X is a demon listed among the demons in the book of demons. Again, they tell you right to your face. Just as Elon tells you very directly that he worships the Destroyer in his “Devil’s Champion” costume. This is what his Halloween costume is.

Then there are the tweets. Sometimes you do have to take things at face value. One rule of the laws of God is that evil-doers have to wear signs of their evilness.

They also have to tell you what they are going to do. So, to them, people have been told and that justifies their actions. Silence is consent to them.

By their deeds, you shall know them

By using discernment, you have to know the rules of the game you are playing. The game will provide the rules. These are the laws that I have posted: Universal Laws, Galactic Codex, God’s Laws, and Natural Laws. The Laws are the thing that the followers of Lucifer decided to disobey. They have been using deception for a long time to avoid being in balance with the creator. That time has ended for them in this plane of existence.

Humanity has gotten to the point where they should be taking responsibility for themselves. They have to see the world for what it really is. If not, then they aren’t ready for the coming times.

If they are worshipping this, look out.

Many people may have bifurcated already. Those reading this are on the Revelations timeline and the timeline of no WWIII threat – as far as some sources tell us. But we’re not on a completely easy timeline where we don’t have work to do.

We have a ton of work to do

We can’t stop working on spreading information or working on ourselves. If we’re not of high enough vibrations, then we won’t magically go on. But, it seems that there’s a bit of a plan in place to get us there. I wish that the world would catch up to how I see the world, but it seems that we’re creating our reality together and this will keep opening up our abilities slowly while some might be more and more introduced to the benevolent ones that are here to assist us. Will this take 3 years, 6 years, or what?

I tend to see us on a pendulum that’s moving toward the positive. For beings who’ve done a lot of their light work, you might be able to get support soon to do more light work. There’s got to be alignment in your different bodies: physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, and astral.

End of Part 3


Ultimately transhumanism is a con that is trying to convince you that you lack something. It purports that we will never be good enough. But in reality, it’s really holding a lot of information from you.

In the higher density or 5D, we are our true selves. We have all our DNA activated. With that will come incredible abilities. I don’t like calling them powers, but we would have amazing powers. We are to be claireverything according to the information being provided by some Galactic Federation sources.

Though I describe it as claireverything, specifically, that means clairaudient, clairvoyant, clairsentient, and claircognizant. These will develop over time. But we will have access to the true history or akashic records. In our period of transition, this will be presented to us along with all the solutions to our current problems.

This is a huge concept

We would have telepathy, be able to travel wherever we imagined ourselves going, we’d understand the history of those we were in contact with, we’d be able to communicate with animals, and we’d know everything. With that type of knowledge in a responsible way, we’d be able to spend our time enjoying life.

Would you like to travel? Would you like to create art or music? Would you like to talk to people about their cultures? Would you like to go to other civilizations? Those things would eventually become part of your experience. But you get access to those experiences they say, through ascension. Ascension in this regard, means you gain knowledge of things but have to go in steps that don’t harm yourself or anyone else.

As some beings have said, giving knowledge like this to us would be like giving a nuke to a 5-year-old. For now, I would be happy just to not be controlled anymore by the self-selected demented rulers of our world. And I’d love to see planetary liberation as I know that is how we’re supposed to live. I’m fighting for us to get this back.

Then there’ll be the time to decide how we want to live in our world. We can figure things out and we would restore and thrive on our planet.

Because we are going to be incredibly powerful. Being free and tapping into our powers throws off the AI prophets. It dismantles the con that AI holds over us. As in the point in The Matrix where Neo realizes that he is a superhuman being and finally rids himself of Agent Smith, we too, will tap into Source and have the right to all knowledge – we will be the supercomputer because all that is, is what we’ll have as our processor. Are you able to conceive of this?

Stay the course and do your work

I’ve tried to provide a bit more detail on the question of transhumanism. Because many of us are on course to re-member-ing or putting back together who we really are, the dark forces are trying against nature to keep you under their boot.

Keep putting out good thoughts and spend some time with the information presented in this series.

Stop the promotion of Elon. He’s not on the good side. Is it possible that he’s under the influence of positive forces? Perhaps, but there’s always a “hero” in their program whose job it is to provide the answer to the problem. Then they bring in their real agenda.

We’ll get rid of these nutcases as we have in the past. Be informed. Release the trauma by doing some breathing exercises. Take a walk and work out the information. Arm yourself and don’t get fooled.

Spend time in nature. Walk barefoot on the earth. Ground yourself and claim your power. Banish the whole attempt into the history bin.

Why they want to control you

Building on the theme presented in Wednesday’s post on Technocracy, it is time to delve into the deeper reason that these technocrats seem bent on controlling every aspect in humanity’s lives.

I’ll begin by looking at the situation from a 3D perspective and then provide the narrative that comes to us from a 5D perspective.

From the 3D perspective, it’s simple to start with the understanding of the perpetrators. You know the saying, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” And, “With great power comes great responsibility.” These are both applicable here as they help create the image of the sociopathy of many of those in power. And it doesn’t take a whole lot of people with the same mental makeup and quasi-religious beliefs to begin controlling things as they do. Add in the ability to create money from thin air – which is done through the global banking system’s fractional reserve lending, raising the debt ceiling, and/or minting a trillion dollar coin – and you have enough ingredients to buy influence and control the system.

As covered earlier in this series, the ends are control of the planet’s assets, and people are among those assets that need to be controlled. Factor in that the world bloodline leaders believe that through obscure contracts, they have had the right to control humanity because Satan was given dominion over the earth for the past couple of millennia, and they claim to have the right to rule over you. The Dark Brotherhood forces believe that they have been given the divine right to rule by their god, Lucifer.

They tend to forget the particulars of their agreements though. In particular: free will, informed consent, and Laws of the Universe such as the Law of Balance (Polarity) and the Law of Cause and Effect. The Law of Balance is one of the primary laws that they are currently in violation of. The highest up in the orders and bloodline families want to conveniently forget those laws.

There’s a similar “forgetfulness” on the part of minions of the order rooted in greed.

Greed is the very clear 3D instance that we can see today “blinding” the judgment of our whole world. In particular, greed has blinded common sense and logic when it comes to understanding the cycles of the financial system. So hopeful are the banksters and venture capitalists – many of them who congregate in the church of Silicon Valley – that they are blind to the facts that the global central banking system and governments of countries as well as many high-profile SIBs (Systematically Important Banks) are insolvent. The system is done. It is overleveraged 1000 times. Specifically, this means that for every $10 held in the bank, $1000 can be lent out. Banking is the greatest Ponzi scheme in the world and the biggest form of hopium around.

As the 3D world sees the financial world as the opportunity for wealth creation which leads to power and manipulation, the dark order participants see the technocratic world and transhumanism as the be-all, end-all. Laws be damned. And they willingly cite Lucifer as the great rebel who permits them to deny the Laws. Thus, they have the “divine right” to rule, lie, cheat, deceive, and manipulate in the pursuit of the material. In the material world, “Greed is good.” And “It’s just business.”

This is where the pursuit of the ends gets justified by the means. Or, they would say, “The ends justify the means.”

The ends are to get power and control. As they state in their published goals (which satisfies the free will requirement in their perspective), the UN Sustainable Goals is one place to read about population reduction, as is Klaus Schwab’s book, The Great Reset. Also, the prevailing theme of the World Economic Forum is for the public to “own nothing and be happy.” Of course, they would like to own everything.

Why they think they should do this

Ok, so they are blinded and far too overreaching in their beliefs that they have the right to rule. They understand the Laws of the Universe but must have been absent the day that their occult teachers taught the subject of balance. They also must’ve missed the part where the world will be returning to light. Do you remember the part where Jesus says he’ll return after Lucifer tempts him to kneel before him to get rewarded his kingdom?

But we know that they didn’t miss the part where the world would see the return of light because that’s what they’ve been using as the authority to impose the climate change agenda. The energies of the great galactic year mean that we’re being hit by more of the sun’s energy and that this will eventually create the rise of humanity’s consciousness. With the rise in consciousness, humanity will see beyond the con game and corruption and lies of the cabal.

We’re seeing this right now as French, Germans, Dutch, Peruvians, and Israelis are in the streets in their respective countries protesting their corrupt government leaders in droves for the past few months. This is what they fear.

Because of this fear, they have their playbooks to enact that would try to put people under their boot more than ever, this coming in the forms of the Great Reset, the financial crash, the CBDC’s, lockdowns, and attacks on food, water, the air, and our communities. All their efforts are coordinated around the world and especially in the United States. The hope is that we all rise as our brothers and sisters in the aforementioned countries are doing and WE throw off the oppressors.

We need to save ourselves. We can use the energies and technologies to help us out. We know that the universe is full of life, and we will get assistance, but we have to demonstrate to others that we want to do this. And even this is a thing that the dark forces are aware of. They desire to take as many of us with them to their world that they’re creating.

The occult belief is that we are at a geographic mid-point called Midgard and we are at a time midpoint called ascension. Both deal with the spiritual and material duality that exists in our earthly realm.

The Great Galactic Year

The Great Galactic Year is the 26,000-year cycle that according to the Mayan and Aztec calendars, we completed in 2012. You’ll remember all the crazy talk of the end of the world at that time. What really happened was that we completed a cycle of time.

With the completion of the cycle of time, we were born anew. This exact timing moves from culture to culture, but it’s known among elite occultists that we are in the window now. Depending on which intel provider you cite, this cycle is also variable as are the effects. What the prevailing story is, is that we’re at the end of a major cycle.




Going back to the galactic year, the idea is that we’re returning back to alignment with the center of the galactic central sun. As we near the equinox or center of the sun, we’re going to get more energy from the sun and just like our days and night, the night gives way to day and day gives way to night. Or darkness falls and light rises. Right now, in the galactic sense and relevant to the solar system, we are in the period of rising or return of the light. On the Yuga graphic above, to the left at the middle, we’re just embarking on the Gold Yuga. That’s the Golden Age. And they lose rule.

A type of judgment day

Since the light is on the rise, this means that frequencies are going to rise on the planet and the people to create a form of judgment. The days are upon us that the frequencies will compel everyone to determine their own path. So, we’re supposed to determine our individual path because of the natural order of our solar system in the universe. If you’ve done inner work and are a heart-based person, you’ll move forward on the ascension path. If you haven’t then you’ll have to stay on the 3D path and your soul would recycle into that timeline until you’re ready to ascend. That said, we’re all one, so we eventually get to 5D.

Nature vs. Nurture

But the judgment is supposed to be a natural thing. Not a thing influenced by nurturing. Nurturing can be said in another way: grooming. It’s the overwhelming nature to evolve, which means seeking out the higher vibrations. It’s unnatural to devolve – though that’s what the Luciferin or Satanists want you to believe. It’s dubious that an overwhelming majority of people would choose the negative path if they knew the consequence of their actions.

Think of the story of Scrooge. When he’s shown the experience that his negative being creates, he is scared straight! For those of us in our society romanced by demons and gargoyles and dystopian apocalypse versions of reality, they may have that as their reality. But it ain’t going to be fun. Debauched and soul-sucking, yes. Redeeming, no.

And this is where we find many of our well-known brothers and sisters. They have been romanced – quite unfairly – to the dark side. Some have gone willingly. Many have gotten themselves there by nefarious and deceitful actions.

Think of those military and political people who’ve been lured by the promise of wealth and power. There are many good people who’ve been deceived by the system, and before they even know it, they’re caught up in it. We all have been to a degree. This is what we need to shine a light on.

Think of the people who were lured into taking the jab. It wasn’t by truth, but by deceit. And many of them will pay a heavy price for their actions.

For those that take advantage of anyone, there’s a reason. The technocrats are infected. Infected by greed. Infected by demons. Infected by AI. To have wealth and power, many have to do things against another person. Think of the wealthy that could solve hunger and homelessness but never do. That is a person stuck in a system chiseled out by people who are up to no good. If you don’t play by the rules, you’ll be out of the game. Remember: deception is the devil’s greatest weapon.

It’s Good vs. Evil

So, we end up on the notion of good vs. evil. To operate in the world of business, there’s much to sacrifice. Now, not all businesses are evil. And there are many good people managing businesses. But there are also many useful idiots out there. What the pandemic did was effectively eliminate small and midsized businesses. To a great degree.

The aim of the technocrat is to consolidate all businesses under a technocracy. The false belief is that technology will solve all our problems. But technology does not create. It only copies.

This is the primary split between good and evil. Good grows. Evil destroys. Nature is a cycle of balance. When the cycle of birth and death is out of balance, then the system will correct itself.

We’re at a point where the system needs to correct itself. By pursuing the agenda of destroying businesses and harming people via the jabs or any of the other unnatural attacks: war, famine, chemtrails, water, fluoride, psyops, etc., the dark has gone too far. The dark falsely believes that they can aid in the cycle of life. They also believe – in violation of the Laws of the Universe – that they can have all experiences including rape, pillage, and murder. They do these things thinking that they are aiding the natural cycle, but they are wrong and act as destroyers to nature. Nature has a way of handling things; it doesn’t need help from others. This is where evilness corrupted the Satanists. The Satanist is in opposition or is the adversary of creation, nature, Source, or God.

The following image is pornography for the technocrat. This is the Internet of Things. All things will be connected on a single platform which had been the Omega system. The idea was to have negative essence sprinkled on everything shown in the system. The system had to be connected and run on a global infrastructure. Within the infrastructure were points of connection. This is where everything got an opportunity to be surveilled.

Now, according to the whistleblowers like NSA employees William Binney, Thomas Drake, Ed Loomis the government had the ability to surveil anyone anytime and were doing so illegally for years. Other whistleblowers cite the creation of Facebook and the story behind Mark Zuckerberg as a Rockefeller agent empowered to run surveillance against US citizens. Then there are the accounts of who is behind cryptocurrencies’ blockchain technology and that it’s not secure.

In the battle that’s ongoing on the surface, we know that there are many technologies being revealed that were intended to surveil all of us. Well, they would do that by transactions, movement, and social credit scores.

The Rockefellers have war gamed the optimum moment to try to win in their psychological game and hit the button. It seems that this was done recently with the release of all their AI apps. The moment would deflate humanity to the point of no return.

Back to Musk, his all-inclusive platform Twitter X is the platform for his “Everything App.” As a compliment to the 15-minute city, depicted in the above graphic, everything that would need to be used or accessed in an app would be funneled into his X app. Buying Twitter for Musk was only the guise to get access to a social media platform where he will eventually usher in new features intended to keep everyone on the app.

The ultimate goal is to keep the animals on the farm. The movie Wall-e perhaps code for the Electronic Wall we’ll all be imprisoned behind shows this future possibility very clearly.

Friday, I’ll present how long AI has been influencing our planet.

The opinions expressed in this post and NaradigmShift blog are my own. My opinions are based on my expertise as a communications, marketing professional, propaganda analyst, and researcher. I’ve also been able to review historic assets, statements and testimony of many intel insiders, royals, whistle-blowers, along with speaking with contacts within the occult, secret societies, agents of light and dark. I’ve researched and reviewed articles and original source materials, press-releases, and FOIA documents. As as council member of the global network Prepare for Change, I’ve been privy to some deep level sources and intel which inform my unique perspective. We are all able to research as one law of Galactic Codex is the right to have access to all knowledge. Seek and ye shall find.

New ‘Birthgap’ film shows how explosion in childlessness is driving population collapse

It’s a situation unprecedented in human history: most of the world’s people live in a country that has dipped below replacement rate, its population now spiraling downward.

No place on earth is exempt from declining birth rates, including Africa, which is just a few steps behind the rest of the world.

The scenario is – perhaps without exaggeration – quietly apocalyptic.

“No society in history has been known to come out of that spiral,” filmmaker Stephen Shaw explained in his documentary “Birthgap,” which explores the thoughts on childbearing of young women all around the world, and attempts to find the cause behind today’s record-low fertility.

The dip into the trend of population collapse seems to have crept up on us, with much of academia seemingly unaware of the phenomenon. And for most, the trend doesn’t have a readily apparent reason. In Shaw’s interviews, which take place across the span of several continents, he is hard pressed to find someone who can explain, or even guess, how the world has arrived to this uncharted territory.

Shaw, a data analyst, crunches numbers in search of an explanation, and uncovers a surprising finding: from about 1973 to 1978, a worldwide population decline has been driven not by changes in family size, but by an explosion of childlessness.

By comparing statistics on first-time mothers and the number of children they go on to have with national fertility rates, Shaw found that childlessness rates skyrocketed within only a few years in many countries.

For example, in Japan in 1974, one in 20 women were childless. By 1977, this ratio was one in four, and by 1990, it had reached one in three, a statistic which held in 2020.

Italy had significantly lower rates of childlessness in 1974, with only one in 30 women childless at the time. But by 1977, childlessness had exploded there as well to a rate of one in five women, and by 1990, it was one in three, according to Shaw.

However, throughout this time, as in Japan, “family structure hadn’t changed at all,” Shaw noted, meaning the proportion of women who had one child, or two, or three, or four or more, all remained the same.

While Shaw doesn’t give specific numbers for most countries, he shares that most have become, like Italy and Japan, “childless nations,” where one-third or more people will become “childless for life.”

Just as remarkable as this trend is the finding in a Dutch meta-analysis, cited by author Jody Day in Shaw’s film, and using data from the early 2000s, that only 10 percent of such women are childless “by choice.”

Another 10 percent are childless due to “known” medical reasons, including infertility. This leaves an undefined but high percentage of women who are “childless by circumstance,” that is, as Day puts it, women who have been unable to find a “suitable partner.” As Shaw shows with moving testimony, this includes women whose partners have been unwilling to have children with them.

However, Shaw’s conclusions about the driving causes of childlessness only minimally integrate these findings. He essentially attributes the explosion in childlessness to the oil shock of 1973, speculating that women delayed childbearing for economic reasons, and considers the lack of rebound in birth rates – a historical norm after economic recovery – as mysterious.

Shaw’s finding that childlessness is a major factor in low birth rates today is revelatory, and needs to be explored further. But to do so, one needs to examine the gaps in his analysis, which I believe unconsciously stem from the bias of the very culture that has engendered the “birthgap” in the first place.

The first problem is that Shaw does not discuss or show fertility rates around the world before 1970. He entirely fails to address that a decline in fertility rates had already begun in the 1960s in countries such as the U.S., the U.K., and Australia, shortly after the introduction of the birth control pill. My understanding is that he doesn’t discuss this because of disparate fertility rate trends among Western countries before the 1970s, when the trends largely began to mirror each other and converge.

Looking at historical trends that stretch back even further can help uncover other unaddressed causes of declining fertility. If one steps back further and looks at, say, the fertility rates of the U.S. and in Europe in the 1800s, the realization emerges that in addition to economic factors, cultural norms are powerful influencers of fertility rates.

Fertility drop trendsetting

For example, researchers have found that by 1870, France was “the first European region in which women started to have fewer children,” with data supporting the claim that France was also the “origin of social norms that lead to declines elsewhere.”

This is evidenced by the fact that language barriers affected the timing of fertility rate declines, according to George Alter and Greogry Clark. They found that in Belgium, French-speaking areas experienced a fertility decline that occurred 20 years earlier, on average, than in Flemish villages of “identical economic conditions.”

What cultural factors may have contributed to this decline? Studies have found that fertility rates in France dropped after the French Revolution (1789–1799), with the European Journal of Population (January 1985) noting:

“Before 1800, marital fertility in France was similar to that of other European countries, but after 1800 the French rate declined rapidly. By 1840 it was two-thirds of the 1800 level, and by 1900 it was half of the 1800 level. In other European countries marital fertility did not begin to decline until the 1870s.”

The French Revolution having been inspired by the Enlightenment, this fact lends credence to the suggestion by Ron J. Lesthaeghe that lower fertility may have been “driven by the spread of Enlightenment ideas and the simultaneous turning away from the pro-natalist doctrines of the Christian religion in Europe.”

Alter and Clark observed, “Enlightenment ideas about reason and humankind’s role in nature, as well as opposition to religious authorities, made birth control within marriage ethically and socially acceptable.”

However, Shaw completely shies away even from suggesting that social factors have potentially influenced fertility rates. Admittedly such factors are much harder, if not impossible, to quantify, and as a data analyst he is likely much more comfortable with clear-cut numbers than with “soft” social sciences. Nevertheless, human behavior has never been a merely economic endeavor, as 1800s Europe numbers show.

That cultural norms influence fertility rates is also shown by the unusually high birth rates of deeply religious communities today, another phenomenon left undiscussed by Shaw. This can’t be predicted by religious affiliation alone, but researchers have found that across denominations, “women who report that religion is ‘very important’ in their everyday life have both higher fertility and higher intended fertility than those saying religion is ‘somewhat important’ or ‘not important.’”

Among Catholics, for example, surveys have found that those who attend mainstream Novus Ordo Masses have an average fertility rate of 2.3, as compared to 3.6 for those who attend Traditional Latin Masses (TLM). Notably, only two percent of TLM-going Catholics approve of contraception, versus 89 percent of Novus Ordo attendees. This gap is remarkably wider than the current fertility rate between mainstream Catholics and Protestants, which is now virtually nonexistent.

The question remains: was there any significant cultural change affecting the world anytime from the 1960s through the 1970s that may have impacted mating and childbearing? If one is searching for cultural drivers of childlessness, and of changed relationship and family dynamics necessarily tied up with it, the sexual revolution should be an obvious potential culprit.

Empowered by the birth control pill, it decoupled sex from babies in practice, a monumental social shift that triggered a whole slew of effects: Big rises in premarital sex, the view of sex as a recreational activity, changed relationship goals and dynamics, increased illegal abortions and demand for legal abortion (since women treated a pill only about 90 percent effective in practice as 100 percent effective), a rise in adultery, a rise in divorce… the effects were nothing short of monumental.

Furthermore, its effects weren’t confined to the U.S. or even developed Western countries, and even influenced countries like Japan, which Shaw is careful to note had not legalized the birth control pill until 1990. James Balmont pointed out in a column for that “just as the ‘swinging sixties’ in America had projected sexual liberty as protest against the Vietnam War, so too did sex become utilised as a means of defiance in Japan.”

An indicator – or trigger – of changing sexual mores in Japan was the sudden explosion of films containing softcore porn in the 1960s. As changed societal mores opened the door to “mainstream” pornographic film in the West, Japan began to produce porn-laced “pink” films that became so commonplace that by 1970, “almost half of movies produced in Japan fell into the ‘pink’ category,” Balmont noted.

While the birth control pill wasn’t yet legal there, a combination of other birth control methods, permissive abortion laws, and the cultural practice of infanticide meant that the pill was not necessary for the country to dramatically reduce birth rates. This is shown by Japan’s sharp fall in fertility during the 1950s. Shaw himself noted that there were “mass abortions” in Japan in the 1970s.

If the explosion in childlessness in Japan and other countries from 1974 to 1977 can’t be attributed to economic factors alone, since there was no birth rate increase associated with recovery from the oil shock of 1973 – what were the other contributing factors? And how much of the childlessness can be accounted for by the sexual revolution?

Some clues may be found in a December 8, 1973 New York Times article entitled “Infantcide in Japan: Sign of the Times?” which tells how that year saw a drastic increase in the discovery of babies abandoned at railway stations. The article explains that the practice extends back over 1000 years in Japan, was outlawed in the “latter third” of the 1800s, and reappeared after World War II.

While the numbers of babies left at railway stations had dramatically increased in 1973, numbers of babies being deserted overall were already high: the article notes that “in Tokyo alone there were 119 cases of children being deserted” the previous year.

Perhaps because the increasing trend of child abandonment predated the oil shock, the Times reported that “many experts attribute contemporary infanticide and child desertions in Japan to rapid urbanization and a resultant drastic shift from the traditional extended family to the nuclear family.” More specifically, “as the size of a family gets smaller, there appear many young mothers who lose confidence in their ability to raise children,” according to Dr. Takemitsu Henmi of Tokyo University’s mental health department.

In an op-ed titled “The Nuclear Family was a Mistake,” David Brooks affirms the close association of urbanization with the nuclear family, asserting that “the decline of multigenerational cohabiting families exactly mirrors the decline in farm employment.”

While the trend of urbanization had begun long ago in parts of the West, and Japan’s urbanization was already well underway by the early 1970s, the impact on fertility rates of an increasing shift to a family structure in which grandparents were not readily available to assist with child rearing, should not be entirely dismissed.

In acknowledgement of this fact, in one of several measures aiming to increase the birthrate today in Hungary, grandparents will be “eligible to receive a childcare fee if they look after young children instead of the parents,” as CNBC has reported.

However, given that urbanization had been underway during the post-war baby boom, the uninterrupted decline in fertility by the 1970s cannot be explained by lack of extended family support systems.

The 1973 New York Times article contains what may be yet another clue. Regarding the rise in child abandonment, “More than half the deaths were attributed to the mother’s lack of mental maturity,” that is, “the increase in the number of childish parents,” as Tokyo University psychiatrist Dr. Takeo Doi described it.

This is another “unquantifiable” factor, but the conclusion is a common-sense one: a parent who will leave their own child for dead embodies the rock-bottom depth of childishness – the total abdication of responsibility for their own child.

To explain the rising infanticide (and abortion, and contraception) phenomenon in another way: lots more people were having sex without readiness to be a parent.

Is it possible that a global shift in attitudes about sex, in which it is no longer associated with babies in people’s minds, could have contributed to an explosion in childlessness as well as to a rise in “childish” parents or would-be parents who were saying “no” to children?

To answer this question, and to understand the effect of the sexual revolution on relationship and family dynamics, we must go back to the introduction of the birth control pill in the West.

Rise of the contraceptive mind in Western culture

For Western societies for which abortion remained illegal and for which infanticide was not culturally “accepted,” unreliable birth control methods meant that until the early 1960s, sex was inextricably tied up with childbearing in the minds of men and women alike. Unless they wanted to risk a dangerous and illegal abortion, or outrage their parents and bear the scorn of their peers, they had to wait until marriage for sex, or marry shortly after discovering the woman was pregnant.

Thanks to the pill, women had (what they thought was) a 100 percent assurance of avoiding pregnancy. Sex was now, in the minds of many, “free.” The possibility of sex before marriage was now nearly irresistible for people unrestrained by moral qualms, and even for the more religious for whom premarital sex tugged at their conscience.

The result was that by the mid-1970s the “majority of newly married American couples had experienced sex before marriage,” according to the Journal of the European Economic Association. In addition, “By 1971, more than 75% of Americans thought that premarital sex was acceptable, a threefold increase from the 1950s,” and the number of unmarried 20 to 24-year old Americans more than doubled from 1960 to 1976.

This last statistic highlights the tremendous impact of the pill in lessening the incentive to marriage and child rearing. Now that men (and women) uninterested in children could satisfy their sex drive without thinking twice about raising kids, women entered into intimate relationships without the assurance that their man wanted to be the father of her children, and vice-versa. The incentive for men and women both to step up and parent children was now much reduced, with the promise of indefinite free sex.

Furthermore, the accompanying rise in magazine and film pornography, which became more and more socially acceptable and widely disseminated – even in places as far-flung from the West as Japan, as noted above – meant that men had unprecedented means for sexual stimulation and “satisfaction,” furthering lessening their incentive to suffer the hurdles of finding a wife or even simply a girlfriend or “fling” partner.

The sad consequences of the new norm of childless sex was shown most poignantly in Shaw’s film during the interview of a Thai woman and her husband of six years. When asked why she hasn’t had children yet, despite the fact that she wants them, she tells Shaw, in reference to her husband, “I just want to make sure that we’re synchronized with our plans.”

Shaw doesn’t have to say it out loud: her husband is emblematic of the modern man-child. His head is shaved except for a middle strip, grown long and pinned up in a top bun. He is texting on his phone, beer in hand, as Shaw interviews his wife and invites her to ask her husband on the spot whether he is ready for children.

“Are we planning to have children for [a] fact?” she asks.

“I want at least five kids, yes,” he replies, seemingly serious.

She turns to Shaw. “My husband is being ridiculous about that, because I am ‘age-delayed.’ I am 44.”

Her husband promptly gets up and walks away as she continues speaking to Shaw.

If Shaw’s numbers are correct, and an explosion in worldwide childlessness is what has tipped fertility rates below replacement level, then this scene embodies the major root cause: men and women are “empowered” to engage in sex and intimate relationships without the commitment to parenthood, and this has triggered a ripple of other mediating factors exacerbating childlessness, such as:

  • Women are prioritizing education and career (and becoming more educated in relation to men),
  • Childbearing is delayed until a woman’s fertility window closes,
  • Changed relationship dynamics making it difficult for women and men both to find partners with whom to have children.

The 1973 oil crisis may have been a temporary trigger of increased abortions, contraception, and overall delayed childbearing (which for some women meant waiting until their fertility window closed).

However, the fertility of the English-speaking world, a cultural standard-bearer, had already been in decline since the 1960s, and in that part of the world major social shifts, and their cascading effects, were already underway.

Difficulty in finding a “suitable partner” with which to parent children is the most difficult factor to unravel, but it is also, Shaw notes, the most important: the most common reason for unplanned childlessness, he says, is “not finding the right partner at the right time.”

Shaw highlights what appear to be contributing factors: women tend to want to settle with men at least as educated as they are, and everywhere, significantly more women are enrolling and staying in college than men; there are “too many options;” a number of young men are staying at home playing video games instead of pursuing women (or have given up on that).

In an interview with Jordan Peterson, Shaw suggested that, instead of asking how women can become less educated, one might ask why men are becoming less involved in society, and why so many are becoming “incels,” that is, the involuntarily celibate.

Peterson objected that people are asking the questions “backwards” in this respect.

“Why people become useless” is “not a mystery,” said Peterson. “It’s easy to be useless. The mystery is why that doesn’t happen to everyone all the time, and the answer is we build up extremely careful structures of societal discipline to encourage people to adopt long-term responsibility. And when you allow those structures to collapse or you undermine them, you get the default. And the default is useless, the default is short-term gratification.”

While Peterson may be primarily referring to the massive numbers (more than 7 million in the U.S.) of prime working age men who aren’t looking for jobs and are living off of family, girlfriends, and government stipends, the role that pornography plays in our modern day relationships crisis can’t be underestimated.

Porn substitutes, for some men, the satisfaction they would otherwise seek in a meaningful relationship with a woman (I would say marriage, except that premarital sex is the norm today). With porn as an outlet for men’s sex drive, and video games as an outlet for their otherwise productive hunter-gatherer instinct, it’s no wonder that men are “checking out” of society altogether.

Alternatively, for men in intimate relationships or who are married, porn is inflicting serious damage on their relationships. The evidence is mounting that porn addiction is destroying sexual intimacy, hiking up divorce rates, and producing record rates of erectile dysfunction. It is also associating arousal with violence, with a reported 88 percent of scenes in “top rented and downloaded porn” containing violence against women.

Of course, in our cultural breakdown, women are not blameless. They have relinquished their role as sexual “gatekeepers,” and the first to do so have set the standard for other women, so that many cannot have a relationship with a man in the first place if they’re not willing to have sex with him before marriage.

Feminism has also done a number on relationships through a few pathways. By causing women to scorn their own femininity, to scorn the idea that they should try to please their man, and to scorn the chivalry of men, both sexes’ respect for and attraction to each other were weakened.

And like men, women have capitulated to the sexual revolution’s new attitude towards relationships, which transforms their whole mating approach. Instead of looking for qualities that will make for good mothers or fathers, many men and women now focus on superficial qualities, forgetting the meaningful root behind their appeal (ie. women demanding a tall man or a high-earning man, instead of focusing on whether he can be a provider and protector).

Making matters worse, the increasing secularization of society and the “anything goes” mentality of the sexual revolution means that mate selection is decreasingly related to shared meaningful values, so that men and women are even more at a loss as to how to choose a mate, let alone build a lasting marriage.

There is no shortage of stories to back up these sad conclusions. Shaw highlights the common occurrence of women who waste five or more years with men who either won’t commit to them for marriage and parenthood, or with whom they eventually realize they cannot see themselves having children.

Only those ideologically wedded to the sexual revolution and the contraceptive pill can deny the unmitigated disaster inflicted by these cultural bombs. With the ripple of their impact only worsening relationships and families today, liberal-minded commentators like Louise Perry are beginning to question the societal benefits of the contraceptive pill, which for the vast majority of mainstream commentators has long been unthinkable (thoughtful Catholics like Janet Smith, who discussed these issues in her famous “Contraception: Why Not?” being the exception).

Now, as Shaw points out, unless fertility returns to replacement level or above, the ensuing population collapse will not only wreak havoc on economies, but will bring about a new epidemic of loneliness, which Shaw has seen tragic glimpses of in Japan.

Solution: A revolution of values 

Fundamentally, a societal shift in fertility can only occur if men and women alike change their attitude to relationships, to children, to motherhood, and to fatherhood.

Our contraceptive mentality reveals a strange disconnect between our ideas and reality. Ask almost any parent, and they will affirm, even for the “accidental” kids, that they wouldn’t for a second think of trading their children for a nicer house or car or having a more comfortable life. And yet, in the decision to contracept, that is exactly how many think: they are sacrificing the existence of a child for greater material well-being.

It is as if we are turning to our would-be child and saying, “It is better that you don’t exist.”

We need to let this sink in. Would we say this with respect to any of our living children? God help us if we do. Could this mentality be at the root of so much family trauma?

Many will say contraception is for the benefit of their other children. And yet, Archduke Eduard Habsburg, father of six, has testified that in his experience, “having lots of children is the greatest gift you can give yourself, your spouse, and also all the children.”

He added that “it will be a gift to have more siblings” for each child not least of all because of how they learn to get along with one another, and how they learn to look out for the youngest, that is, the most vulnerable, in the family.

And it is not only children who need to be celebrated and esteemed. In his interview with Shaw, Peterson spoke of the importance of “culturally elevat[ing] the sacred significance of motherhood, to put the mother again on something approximating the necessary pedestal.”

“You see this in Catholic imagery all the time… I would say any society that doesn’t hold the mother and the infant as sacred is doomed. For obvious reasons, since we all have mothers and we’ve all been infants,” said Peterson.

Indeed, it is the authentic Catholic worldview that esteems motherhood, and children, to the fullest. Time has now borne out how the Church’s teaching on contraception comes from a place of wisdom that perhaps could not be totally understood until now.

Esteem for fathers is also paramount. One need only look at the devastating effects of fatherlessness on young men and society as a whole to begin to grasp this. Their presence, involvement, discipline, and love – or lack thereof – profoundly affects their children in just about every respect, and can “make or break” the trajectory of their children’s lives. Their ideas also have a heavy influence on their children’s worldview, usually more so than that of mothers.

I believe that another step to reversing the explosion in childlessness involves men becoming better men, and women becoming better women. This will help foster stronger, lasting relationships, and is a precondition for people even beginning to consider the birth control pill a failed experiment.

This is also part of the necessary work of simply relearning what it means to be a man, or relearning what it means to be a woman.

But I don’t think this will work if it’s done merely in modern-day fashion, for the purpose of “self-actualization.” In fact, an attitude which only does anything for “self-actualization” is contrary to parenthood itself, because having children is not a “self-improvement” exercise or act of self-gratification – it is for the sake of the children, to give them the most fundamental good: the gift of life.

What’s required for lasting change is real love-in-action, and this is engendered deeply, cohesively, and meaningfully by a belief that God is the first and ultimate Father, who Himself lovingly welcomes each new life and has a transcendent vision for each human being, in which they bear fruit that lasts for eternity.