Larry David Learns About His Jewish-Confederate Slave-Owner Great-Great-Grandfather

Comedian Larry David allowed Henry Louis Gates, Jr., host of “Finding Your Roots” on PBS, to do a little genealogical digging. On live T.V., Gates reveals to David that they traced his family line to Henry Bernstein of Mobile, Alabama, who was David’s great-great-grandfather back in the Civil War era. And, as it turns out, Bernstein was a slave owner.

Bernstein was also one of 3,000 Jewish Confederate soldiers. He owned two slaves, which seemed to blow David’s obviously conditioned mind. We think Gates, as a real historian, knew the hidden secret all along from doing other Jewish genealogies. He asks David, “What part of the Jewish experience is this?”

David says it’s part of a family history that no one ever talked about nor had ever mentioned this truth bomb to him. Of course faked self-depreciation is part of David’s schtick, so who knows.

To be perfectly fair to Larry David, his southern Jewish great-great grandfather was not an oddity or an outlier. Although not a large demographic, almost without exception Southern Jewry was very loyal to the Lost Cause. And many in the North were openly sympathetic or outright Copperheads.

In fact, as southern antebellum Jews go, his ancestor, poor ol’ Henry Bernstein, was a piker with only two slaves. Most southern Jews were active slave holders and traders with over a third owning five or more. One of the largest slave owners in all the South was Jacob Cohen of Georgetown, South Carolina with 294 slaves.

In contrast, I have census records for all my paternal great-great and great-great-great-grandparents. They were all gentile “cracker” southerners who fought for the Confederacy — and only one owned one slave. Too poor is my assumption.

Source: The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Vol. 1

David handled the revelation and outing stoically; but at minute 2:15, he exhibits his (and the universal) ignorance of true history by claiming “his people” were part of the battle against the South and slavery. In fact, besides being substantial slave owners, the Jews played almost no role in the Abolitionist Movement.  They were so disengaged that real abolitionists castigated them in frustration. In the North, Jews played key roles in cotton trading and textiles and were motivated to keep the product flowing.

Jewish Professor Salo Baron perceived no moral dilemma on the part of 19th-century Jews: “Jewish merchants, auctioneers, and commission agents in southern states continued to buy and sell slaves until the end of the Civil War. … At no time did Southern Jews feel tainted by the slave trade.”

Some, especially blacks, expected the moral lead in the abolition of slavery to be assumed by the “people of the Bible.” But many commentators during and since were puzzled by such fervent defense of a system out in which Jews presumably made their Biblical trek. The American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society in their report of 1853 expressed their frustration. Excerpts from the report state:

The Jews of the United States have never taken any steps whatever with regard to the slavery question. As citizens, they deem it their policy to have every one choose which ever side he may deem best to promote his own interests and the welfare of his country. They [142] have no organization of an ecclesiastical body to represent their general views; no General Assembly, or its equivalent. The American Jews have two newspapers, but they do not interfere in any discussion which is not material to their religion. It cannot be said that the Jews have formed any denominational opinion on the subject of American slavery… The objects of so much mean prejudice and unrighteous oppression as the Jews have been for ages, surely they, it would seem, more than any other denomination, ought to be the enemies of caste, and friends of universal freedom. [Louis Ruchames, “Abolitionists and the Jews,” PAJHS, vol. 42 (1952), pp. 153-54]

Even the Jewish scholars can find but a few sentences of Jewish protest over the plight of the Black slave. It is now clear, writes Dr. Marcus, “that most antebellum Jews, those in the North as well as in the South, cared little about the moral issues of human bondage.

“Jews not only accepted this doctrine, Dr. Korn admits, but “some of them helped to formulate and circulate it …

Those Jews who stood against the institution were scorned and rebuked — most harshly by their own brethren in the synagogue. Even the anti-slavery Jews, opposed the spread of slavery not out of sympathy for the condition of Blacks, but because it was a threat to their jobs. [Robert Korn, “Jews and Negro Slavery,” p .215]

All 21 synagogues in the South were pro-Confederate; and of those in the North, there is no history of a rebuke of the slavocracy or support of emancipation. All southern synagogues excluded blacks from membership. In fact, instead, influential Jews pushed for Christianizing the slaves. Post Civil War, they were hard-line segregationists, at least until the end of the 19th century, when Eastern Europeans emerged on the political scene.

“The pursuit of wealth in slaves and usury not only violated Jewish ethics but destroyed the rough democracy imposed upon a people in exile. Initially, the Jews looked to their rabbis and scholars for guidance. Eventually, the aristocracy of learning gave way to the aristocracy of wealth. Leadership of the community passed from the wise man to the rich man, a curse of organizational Jewry even today.” [ Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht, The Fate of the Jews: A People Torn Between Israeli Power and Jewish Ethics, p. 39.]

The slavery debate raged across the country but no Jewish leaders of the Old South “ever expressed any reservations about the justice of slavery or the rightness of the southern position.”[ Abraham J. Karp, Haven and Home: A History of Jews in America. p. 29]

Jewish clergy did not even discuss black slavery until 1860, and then primarily in support of it. Jewish writer Arthur Hertzberg sums up their position [Hertzberg, The Jews in America: Four Centuries of an Uneasy Encounter]:

As was to be expected, the Jewish clergy in the South, without exception, endorsed the Confederacy. These preachers, most of whom were quite recent immigrants from Germany, summoned up great passion in their defense of states’ rights. They repeated the conventional platitudes of that day, that the black race was incapable of taking care of itself.

No event caused the forces of bondage to rejoice more than when Rabbi Morris Jacob Raphall of Congregation B’nai Ieshurun in New York issued a sermon that was to become known as the “Bible Defense of Slavery.” On Jan. 4, 1861, he preached the most publicized sermon ever delivered by an American Jew up to that time:

It remains a fact which cannot be gainsaid that in his own native home, and generally throughout the world, the unfortunate negro is indeed the meanest of slaves. Much had been said respecting the inferiority of his intellectual powers, and that no man of his race has ever inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral.

‘What he did,” Dr. Korn wrote, “was to place Judaism squarely in opposition to the philosophy of abolitionism… and insisted that… biblical tradition and law guaranteed the right to own slaves.” This critical confirmation of “God’s will” from a prominent and respected Jewish authority, indeed the highest paid American clergyman, gave the slavemaster all he needed to fight the righteous battle against the abolitionists. [Robert Korn, “The Civil War,” p. 17]

One lone Rabbi, David Einhorn, spoke out against the prevailing attitude, and was run out of his Baltimore congregation in 1861:

Of the moral condition: There are enough churches, synagogues and temples, but there is very little religion, little morality … here [among the Jews]. Everything is empty, everything is glimmer … Here, too, rules the golden eagle rather than the … Here, too, all feelings of the heart and dreams are concentrated only on acquiring [things] … There is only one thought: to make as much as possible. [Fein, Baltimore Jews]

The Jewish press weighed in with its opinion on the matter of black slavery and of the character of the African as well. Again, the abolitionists were bitterly disappointed. The Jewish Record of Jan. 23, 1863:

We know not how to speak in the same breath of the Negro and the Israelite. The very names have startlingly opposite sounds — one representing all that is debased and inferior in the hopeless barbarity and heathenism of six thousand years; the other, the days when Jehovah conferred on our fathers the glorious equality which led the Eternal to converse with them, and allow them to enjoy the communion of angels. Thus the abandoned fanatics insult the choice of God himself, in endeavoring to reverse the inferiority which he stamped on the African, to make him the compeer, even in bondage, of His chosen people.

There is no parallel between such races. Humanity from pole to pole would scout such a comparison. The Hebrew was originally free; and the charter of his liberty was inspired by his Creator. The Negro was never free; and his bondage in Africa was simply duplicated in a milder form when he was imported here … The judicious in all the earth agree that to proclaim the African equal to the surrounding races, would be a farce which would lead the civilized conservatism of the world to denounce the outrage. [ Hugh H. Smythe, Martin S. Price, “The American Jew and Negro Slavery,” The Midwest Journal, vol. 7, no. 4 (1955-56), p. 318]

Yes, There Are No States …. Wake Up, Oh, Glory, Wake Up!!!


By Anna Von Reitz

Thanks for the best laugh I have had in a long time…..

Bill Henshall has concluded an investigation and found out that there are no states!

Hahahahahahahah!

Hello, America?  I love you all!  — But really, this is too droll!

Surely, you realize that the entire concept of a “state” or a “nation” exists only in your head?  That the reality of any such political entity or subdivision or kingdom or country is a legal FICTION? 

Surely, you have seen the names and borders of countries shift and change even in your own lifetimes?  Where is “Burma” now?  What happened to “Yugoslavia”?

My sides ache.  My mouth is dry from gasping.

Lord, Lord…..

Yes, it’s true.  There are no states, no provinces, no kingdoms. 

And that is why the actual basis of “States” in this country have been summoned to assemble: people.

People create States.  People are states.

If anyone ever challenges you to show them where you own any sovereign piece of land, dig a hole at least six inches deep in the ground, stand in it, and pound on your chest.  Take a photo.

It really is as simple as that.

The United States of America (Unincorporated) is an organization of what?  People. 

It is a business structure, an unincorporated Holding Company.  And what’s that?  It’s people organized to do a job, fulfill a function, for still other people who are organized as what?  State and County Jural Assemblies.

Lions and tigers and bears!  Who knew?

Yes, this is why it is so absolutely and urgently NECESSARY and important that you all heed the call and “return home” to the land and soil jurisdiction of your States of the Union (get your political status records corrected) and join your State Jural Assembly—-because you are your States. 

Your Jural Assemblies are what create and maintain and give life and breath and authority to your Counties and your States. 

If you don’t make the commitment to live on your soil and land, then it stands vacant. 

If you don’t make the commitment to occupy the Public Offices of your Counties and States, then foreign corporate employees will be happy to do this “for” you, and claim that you are “absent”. 

Which then ALLOWS them to do whatever THEY please with YOUR assets.

Honest to God, this entire country has been bamboozled and our people have been reduced to walking, talking zombies, still more than half asleep–despite me and many, many others banging a gong as loud as we can.

Re-convey your Trade Name to the land and soil of your State.  Seize upon your Assumed Names/NAMES.  The forms you need are already on my website: www.annavonreitz.com, Article 928, Editable documents. 

And then, join your State Jural Assembly.  Go to www.national-assembly.net and connect. 

You are the sovereigns of this land.  Nobody else on Earth is.  It’s up to you to breathe life and meaning into your States of the Union—and if you don’t do it, nobody else can. 

The United States of America (Unincorporated) is still alive and still standing in the doorway like a lion—the lawful government of this country with all four paws on the floor.  But you have to answer her call.  You have to re-boot your States and your States have to re-boot your National States of States. 

NOW.

For your edification, and if you are like me, your “Ouch!” sense of humor — I am including the research (thus far) into the profound truth that the “States” do not exist (without you).  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajl7bZ8J2ws     Constitutional discussion with Bill and friend–there are NO States, Article I, Section 2, Cl. 3     


—————————-
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Historic Trusts, the World Economy, and You


By Anna Von Reitz

Long ago, wealth began accumulating.  It’s a strange thing — wealth. 

At a certain point it acquires the “critical accumulation mass” and it grows all by itself, like a cancer.  It goes metastatic. It diversifies.  It builds potential energy like water being backed up by a dam, if it isn’t invested.  And if it is invested, it seeks opportunity much like flowing water, too, pushing into every new nook and cranny it can find.

It should come as no surprise then, that at a certain point, wealth becomes practically “un-spendable” by heirs.

What does one person do with a hundred trillion dollars worth of gold?

There are Seven Covenants in the Bible and so, there are Seven Covenant Trusts.  These are all unimaginably huge.   There are also a couple banks in the world that are literally thousands of years old that have holdings on a scale that can be measured against the Covenant Trusts.

There are at least a dozen Spanish Trusts that legitimately belong to living heirs of those who began the trust accumulation during the days of the Spanish Treasure Ships.  These are not as huge as the Covenant Trusts, but they are still unimaginably huge.   There are other family trusts, like those belonging to the Saudi Royal Family, and the British Royal Family, that are monstrous, too.

Then there are Business Trusts, often set up as “Commonwealth Trusts” among groups of private investors for their heirs or their pet project or cause. Like the Spanish Trusts, they can be several hundred years old and depending on their own peculiar “mission” may or may not share elements similar to family or charitable trusts.

Then there are a few really BIG Charitable Trusts, most of them accumulated by politicians via deceits worked against generations of innocent people.  These trusts pretend to be “charitable” but upon closer examination they are usually used for nefarious purposes — manipulating money and commodity markets, paying for large scale mercenary armies — staffed by people who don’t even know they are acting as mercenaries, buying up public land and resources then used to benefit the players behind this larceny in the name of charity and so on.

Finally, there are Treaty Trusts— these are also called “Restitution Trusts” — and a few of them are really sizable, too.  These are endowments built up from various resources to settle negotiated peace treaties in wars and trade squabbles and things of that nature.

In all, there are about 4,800 Historic Trusts.  Most of the actual Trustees I have spoken to are good people who want to do good things and release back the flow of wealth that has been withheld for so long—- however, the situation is like a person starved almost to death going to an all-you-can-eat Smorgasbord.

The shock of suddenly going from nothing to everything could kill the intended beneficiary. And, the release of so much hoarded actual wealth could render such wealth relatively worthless.

Money, we have to realize— even actual, factual money— is a commodity.  If you flood the market with a commodity, ANY commodity— what happens?  The perceived value of that commodity tanks, and suddenly, gold really could be used for paving bricks and shingles.

Most of the Historic Trust Assets have been used to underwrite banks, especially the ‘central banks” set up by various national governments.  Those banks have foolishly extended vast amounts of credit — up to a thousand times net — of their assets, and now they are hunting and scratching and trying to find new sources of hard assets to keep the “fractional reserve banking” pyramid scheme going.

This has led them to very dishonest schemes employed to seize “Special Deposits” — Historic Trust assets left with the banks in good faith — and use any excuse possible to maintain control of these assets without paying interest.

To quote one of my correspondents, “This situation is crazy…. we are drowning in wealth, and nobody dares to cut any of it loose.”

Well, they’re afraid to, because nobody knows what will happen.  We have lived according to the niggardly “Doctrine of Scarcity” for thousands of years. The floodwaters of wealth are backed up clear to Poughkeepsie. Will the dams hold?  Are the reservoirs sufficient?  What happens when it starts to go?

In order for there to be any good result, the wealth has to be released in a gradual, orderly fashion —  a modest trickle compared to the amount of wealth amassed needs to be aimed at new technologies, pollution clean up, infrastructure improvements,  and economies that have large growth potential — like most of the Third World.  And then, as the world economy “stabilizes” and grows, more wealth is released to fund the new growth.

It has to be like this, because— to use another metaphor — otherwise, you over-fertilize the field and kill everything.  We can literally kill the world economy with too much wealth released too fast. 

Now, people in the developed countries will understandably question the big emphasis on public works and infrastructure developments aimed at the Third World when their own infrastructure is crumbling, so some really good projects have to be parceled out for them, too, though it may seem initially that they are undeservedly getting the short end of the stick.  They will catch up and the investments made in their poorer neighbors will bear much fruit for everyone.

In addition, we have proposed a Basic Living Stipend to be made available to everyone on Earth, equivalent to a constantly cost-adjusted amount of $2000 in local currency value per month, per person.  This would immediately place a safety net under all people at risk and largely end chronic desperate poverty on Earth.

The Naysayers say that this would simply increase inflation and to some extent it would, however, Beta Tests have shown that in actual practice, most people have used the extra income in profoundly good ways — taking care of their health, their homes, their families, and improving their educations and their communities. The Niggardly Among Us also say it will encourage “more useless Eaters”.  We say it would help those who need help and provide peace of mind enough so that people can think of better lives and things to do.

We are still battling over that concept, how it could be delivered, etc., but speaking for myself, Individual Living Being Accounts with independent triple layer security delivered by a new blockchain-like technology that can be delivered to each person worldwide via simple hand-held devices makes sense. Decentralizing delivery cuts all the dishonest governments and agencies right out of the loop and aside from local bunko operations, assures that the funds actually get delivered to all the people we intend to help.

The banks that are heavily invested in securities don’t want this new world economy to open up. They want to chisel their way forward and keep the Old Game going, keep operating according to the Doctrine of Scarcity, and playing all their old gambits.  It’s essential that they understand that that isn’t going to happen. This is a new era in human history.  We have outgrown the old system. We can either all work together to make this Transition something good and glorious, or we can senselessly starve together.

One final note.  The existence of all this wealth built up in the Historic Trusts has caused no end of Flim-Flam artists and Wannabe Trustees showing up out of nowhere claiming to be the rightful owners or at least, rightful managers, of all these Historic Trusts.  They’ve come running from all directions like flies on carrion.  Some of them are funded by sleazy bankers and sleazy national governments.  Others are free-lancers or “runners” put up by crime syndicates. Almost all of them sing a good song and dance of peace, love, and joy. Indeed, Satan appears as an angel of light, but you will see what he does and not put faith in what he says.

Because this release has to be a controlled release, the people handling it have to be intelligent, compassionate and wise. This is not a moment in history to try any airy-fairy academic theories, nor is it a time when we can afford to get bogged down in religious or political differences. If this is to work for the good of Mankind, the theorists have to step aside and let those with a more practical and good-hearted character take the stage.

Toward that end, the governments — which with very few exceptions are just corporations at this point — need to stop competing with each other.  Just call a truce. I know that is antithetical to their culture, but that’s what needs to be done for the sake of the whole planet.  For a brief time at least, everyone needs to stop thinking in terms of me, me, me and think about us, us, us. 

Let the actual Trustees — all of them — come forward and have their say and together make decisions about whose assets are going to underpin what, and not in the sense of competing for investments, but in the sense of saving the world economy and finding our way forward. 

Any one of the major trusts could, if unleashed, destroy the world economy and thereby destroy billions of lives more efficiently than any atom bomb. 

It is therefore of the most urgent and utmost importance for all concerned for the governments to stop interfering and trying to cherry pick assets and Trustees and using dishonest tactics to suppress some and advance others.  Nothing good can be built on a criminal basis. Our recent past history and personal experience in life should be sufficient to convince any mature leader that what I am saying is true.

The actual Trustees of the Historic Trusts need to be brought together to hash things out and the political leaders of government service corporations need to stand ready to help implement a sensible plan to restructure the world economy and deploy assets without further argument or delay.  I will pledge our resources toward such a meeting of hearts and minds. 

—————————-
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Hepatitis B Vaccine ‘Significantly Increased’ IL-6, A Bio-Marker For Autism’: Mainstream Media Silence

By World Mercury Project Board Member JB Handley, Co-Founder, Generation Rescue

GUANDONG, China?—Sun Yat-sen University’s (a Top 10 university in China) Dr. Zhibin Yao is not a household name in the American autism community, but perhaps he should be. Not only is he American-educated (University of Pittsburgh) and the author of 33 peer-reviewed studies, but he’s also the lead author of two of the most important biological studies ever done analyzing how, exactly, a vaccine can cause autism.

In 2015, Dr. Yao was the lead author of “Neonatal vaccination with bacillus Calmette–Guérin and hepatitis B vaccines modulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity in rats,” the first study that ever looked at the impact ANY vaccine might have on the brains of rats. I discussed this study in detail in an extensive article I wrote in April titled, “International scientists have found autism’s cause. What will Americans do?.” Vaccine Papers, a website dedicated to a rigorous, science-based analysis of the risks and benefits of vaccines, explained the paper this way:

“This is the first study to test the effects of immune activation by vaccination on brain development. All other studies of immune activation have used essentially pathological conditions that mimic infection and induce a strong fever. A criticism I have heard often from vaccine advocates is that the immune activation experiments are not relevant to vaccines because vaccines cause a milder immune activation than injections of poly-IC or lipopolysaccharide (two types of immune system activators). This new study demonstrates that vaccines can affect brain development via immune activation. Hence, the immune activation experiments are relevant to vaccines…The hep B vaccine increased IL-6 in the hippocampus (the only brain region analyzed for cytokines).”

Despite its importance, explaining Dr. Yao’s 2015 paper to the average person wasn’t easy, partly because his study covered a number of other topics, meaning you had to isolate the data that implicated the Hepatitis B vaccine, and then explain it. With his next paper, however, Dr. Yao and his team made explaining everything much easier, and left very little to interpretation.

The authors noted that the HBV [Hepatitis B vaccinated] mice showed ‘significantly increased’ IL-6, which we know is a biomarker for autism.

So much bigger than Wakefield, and zero media coverage

In 1998, Dr. Andrew Wakefield ended up crucified for a paper that only noted what some parents had reported–namely, that their children regressed into autism after the MMR vaccine. Dr. Yao’s second paper, on the other hand, conducted a thorough study of the Hepatitis B vaccine’s impact on the brains of mice, and did so versus a control group of mice who received a saline placebo. This is a “gold standard” animal study that you would typically do BEFORE a drug was introduced to the human population. In a world where vaccines were treated like other prescription drugs, Dr. Yao’s study would have sent up a giant red flag about the neurotoxicity of the Hepatitis B vaccine. Of course, that didn’t happen, and this is the first time you’ve probably ever heard of this study:

As you can see, this study was actually published in late 2016. I saw it for the first time two weeks ago, and almost couldn’t believe what I was reading. Dr. Yao and his colleagues open with a statement that should make every American parent shudder:

“The hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) is administered to more than 70% of neonates worldwide. Whether this neonatal vaccination affects brain development is unknown.”

Given the “unknown” of whether or not Hepatitis B impacts brain development, Dr. Yao and his colleagues then set about answering the question, and their answers are disturbing on so many levels, let me try and summarize:

1. The HBV vaccine negatively impacted the behavior of mice.

Specifically, the HBV mice (those that were vaccinated with Hepatitis B vaccine) showed a “significant decrease in locomotion” and “increased anxiety.”

2. The HBV vaccine mice experienced a spike in the cytokine IL-6.

The authors noted that the HBV mice showed “significantly increased” IL-6, which we know is a biomarker for autism.

3. It took time for the neurological impact of HBV vaccine to manifest.

This troubled the study authors. They discussed the “latency,” meaning the extensive time between when the mice were vaccinated and when the neurological disorders presented themselves (note that Hepatitis B vaccine trials in infants typically followed the infants for one week or less to monitor adverse events):

“…the significant difference found in the present study is between the immunized mice and the control mice, rather than between the mice of 8-week-old and the mice of another age. Therefore, this difference does reflect the effects of the neonatal vaccination. The mechanism underlying the latency and transient phenomenon is very complex and needs further studies for well understanding, because such latency involves many aspects of the immune responses in the periphery and CNS as well as neural plasticity.” 

4. They concluded with a statement that, in a sane world, would prompt the immediate cessation of Hepatitis B vaccine administration to babies.

What can I say, just read what they wrote for yourself:

“This work reveals for the first time that early HBV vaccination induces impairments in behavior and hippocampal neurogenesis. This work provides innovative data supporting the long suspected potential association of HBV with certain neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism and multiple sclerosis.”

Conclusion

It’s all there, in black and white. A growing, compelling body of work tying vaccinations to autism through biological science. Dr. Yao’s paper requires little interpretation, and it’s just sitting there, hiding in plain sight (this is the first time anyone in America has ever written about this paper.) Recently, a group of scientists published an editorial emphasizing how important animal studies are to understanding the neurotoxicity of aluminum adjuvant used in vaccines. They noted that “multiple vaccine administrations and neuro/immunologic adverse effects is difficult to establish by epidemiology.” Epidemiology, the study of large numbers of people and health outcomes using a spreadsheet, is rife with potential for abuse, manipulation, and missing signals. That’s why biological science is so important, and that’s why this new study from Dr. Yao and his colleagues provides a devastating blow to anyone who claims a vaccine couldn’t possibly cause brain damage or autism. As Dr. Yao and his colleagues concluded:

“This study used the same vaccine and a similar time schedule to those used for human infant vaccination in China. Therefore, these findings suggest that there may be similar effects of neonatal HBV vaccination on brain development and behavior in humans.”

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Google employees finally wake up and realize they’re working for PURE EVIL… AI drone “terminator” project meets internal resistance

(Natural News) More than a dozen Google employees have quit working for the tech monolith in recent weeks as a response to the company’s forging ahead with a Terminator-esque artificial intelligence (AI) program that could end up weaponizing machine-learning technologies for use in military war games. Known as “Project Maven,” the Department of Defense (DoD)…