Understanding the global carbon cycle: Most CO2 is bound up in Earth’s core, which is why CO2 levels rise when continents move

(Natural News) Mainstream media would have you believe that the fluctuations in the carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere are completely man-made. They insist that technological advances as well as overpopulation have driven our planet to a state of crisis – one evidenced by a rapidly warming atmosphere. However, a basic understanding of the…

Introduction to Hiatal Hernia: A Potentially Dangerous Digestive Condition

A hernia is a condition where an organ pushes through an opening that a certain muscle holds in place. There are four different hernias that typically occur in the human body:

  • Inguinal hernia — This occurs when intestines push through the inguinal canal, a tubular passage found near the groin area. It helps hold up the testicles in men, and the uterus in women.1
  • Umbilical hernia — When the intestines pass through the abdominal wall, a bulge near the belly button occurs. Children younger than 6 months are the largest demographic of this condition, although it usually goes away when they’re a year old.2
  • Incisional hernia —This type of hernia can emerge because of a recent abdominal surgery. The intestines may push through the incision scar, or the weakened tissue surrounding it.3
  • Hiatal hernia — Hiatal hernia occurs when a part of your stomach protrudes upward through the hiatus, which is an opening in your diaphragm.4

This guide will focus on hiatal hernia. This condition can occur in anyone, from unborn children to those who are approaching middle and senior age. Its symptoms should not be ignored, because they can be very uncomfortable and potentially dangerous.5,6

The Causes of Hiatal Hernia

Hiatal hernia usually occurs in people ages 50 and above, and to those who are overweight or obese. Its exact causes are unknown, but there are a few theories, such as:7

  • Injury or trauma — A strong blow to the central chest area can rupture your digestive organs, causing the diaphragm to loosen and allow the stomach to go up.
  • Birth defect — It’s possible that some people are born with a large hiatus, which will need to be addressed to prevent the hernia from worsening.
  • Constant pressure — Certain actions that steadily exert pressure on your chest such as vomiting, coughing and straining while defecating can cause hiatal hernia.

Symptoms of Hiatal Hernia to Watch For

Most of the time, hiatal hernias are minor and asymptomatic, and you can live a full life without needing medical treatment at all. However, those who do develop complications typically display symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).8 This is a condition in which stomach acid rises to your esophagus, causing symptoms such as:9,10

  • Heartburn — An uncomfortable, burning feeling in the chest that usually occurs after eating, due to the stomach acid climbing up the esophagus.
  • Swallowing problems — GERD can make it hard for you to eat your usual foods.
  • Pain — You may feel pain in your chest or the upper part of your abdomen.

Learn All About Hiatal Hernia in This Guide

Even if your hiatal hernia is asymptomatic, there’s still a chance you can develop complications if you don’t follow certain preventive measures. This guide will show you massages, dietary practices and other methods to help you deal with hiatal hernia.

MORE ABOUT HIATAL HERNIA

Hiatal Hernia: Introduction

What Is Hiatal Hernia?

Hiatal Hernia Symptoms

Hiatal Hernia Causes

Hiatal Hernia Types

Hiatal Hernia Treatment

Hiatal Hernia Surgery

Hiatal Hernia Prevention

Hiatal Hernia Diet

Hiatal Hernia FAQ

Next >

What Is Hiatal Hernia?

Dark Choco-Dipped Cherry Bites Recipe

Recipe by Pete Evans

Many people just can’t end a meal without dessert. After
all, a satisfying dessert refreshes your palate and gives your lunch or dinner
a sweet ending.

Most people, however, would reach for a bowl of ice cream or
a slice of cake to satiate their sweet tooth — but why do so when there are
healthier dessert options to choose from? Case in point: these delicious cherry
bites from Australian celebrity chef Pete Evans, with whom I co-wrote “The Fat
for Fuel Ketogenic Cookbook.”

This easy dessert recipe combines the freshness and tartness
of cherries with the bitter taste of raw cacao chocolate and the mild sweetness
of coconut flakes, giving you a deep burst of flavor in every bite.

 

Prep time:
15 minutes (plus 30 minutes chilling time)

Cook time:
15 minutes

 

Ingredients:

1/2 pound
fresh cherries,
pitted and cut into halves

1 tablespoon
honey

1 cup
unsweetened coconut flakes

2 fresh dates,
pitted

3
tablespoons coconut
oil
, melted

1/2 pound raw cacao chocolate, chopped

 

Procedure:

1.                  
Preheat the oven to 325 degrees Fahrenheit.

2.                  
Place the pitted and halved cherries on a pastry
paper-lined baking tray and bake for 15 minutes. Keep the cherry stems aside in
a separate bowl. Allow the cherries to cool.

3.                  
Place the baked cherries, honey, dates, coconut
flakes and coconut oil in a food processor and pulse briefly until mixture is
combined.

4.                  
Roll the mixture into cherry-sized balls, and
insert a cherry stem into the center of each ball at the base.

5.                  
Continue rolling between the palms of your hands
until they form perfect balls. Place each directly onto another tray prelined
with baking paper. Transfer the tray to the freezer and chill for 30 minutes or
until the cherry balls are firm.

6.                  
Meanwhile, place the raw cacao chocolate in a
bowl over a saucepan filled to 3/4 with simmering water and stir until the
chocolate is completely melted.

7.                  
Remove the melted chocolate from the heat.

8.                  
Dip the chilled cherry balls into the chocolate
until they are completely coated, then return them to the paper-lined tray.
When all the cherry balls have been dipped and coated, return the tray to the
refrigerator and chill for another five minutes or until the chocolate sets.

This recipe makes 15 cherry bites.

Three Cheers for
Cherries!

Fresh cherries are a favorite fruit during the summer
season, not only because of their luscious flavor but their versatility as well.
You can use cherries in different recipes: baked in pastries, added to fruit
salads or even to complement the saltiness of sauces and gravies.

However, did you know that there are two classifications of
cherries, in the form of either sweet or tart (sour)? The former is often eaten
fresh, while sour ones are usually frozen, sold dried or made into juice. They
also form a deeper and fuller flavor when cooked, which makes them more
preferable in baked desserts.[i]

Nevertheless, both tart and sweet cherries are loaded with
various vitamins, minerals and antioxidants, which all
give them their amazing health benefits, such as:

May help relieve gout and arthritis. This is thanks to the anthocyanins and bioflavonoids that slow
down enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 and -2,
therefore providing relief for these conditions.[ii]

Promoting
healthy sleep.
Cherries are a natural source of melatonin, which
plays a vital role not just in sleep but also in curbing
free
radicals
and cancer prevention.

 

Based on research, consuming tart
cherry juice helped increase melatonin levels and improved total sleep time
and sleep efficiency.[iii]

 

Reducing your stroke risk. Consuming
tart cherries activates peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR) in
your tissues, which have a beneficial effect on your cholesterol levels and blood
pressure, and may help reduce risk of not only stroke but other diseases.

Improving
risk factors of heart disease and diabetes.
Quercetin, one of the most
potent antioxidants in cherries, has been found to improve cardiovascular
health by managing blood pressure levels.[iv]

 

Meanwhile, another animal study where
rats were given tart cherry powder with a high-fat diet gained less weight
and had less body fat than rats that were not. Lower levels of triglycerides
and inflammation were also noted.[v]

 

Reducing risk of dementia. Polyphenols
in cherries help combat inflammation and oxidative stress, which both play a
role in dementia.[vi]

Lowering
risk of colon cancer.
Cherries are found to reduce the formation of
carcinogenic compounds like heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs).

 

One study found that when added to
hamburger patties, cherries had anywhere between 69 and 78.5 percent less
HAAs after cooking, compared to patties that did not use the fruit.[vii]

 

 

The Best Way to Store
Fresh Cherries

For this recipe, it’s best to use fresh cherries. However,
you must take note of certain factors when storing them to prevent them from
going to waste. Ideally, they should be consumed within two days, if at room
temperature, for maximum flavor.

You can also store cherries in the fridge for a longer shelf
life. Do not wash them before storing to prevent speeding up their
deterioration. Instead, wash them before eating or using in recipes.

The Health Merits of
Raw Cacao Chocolate

The health
benefits of dark chocolate
are mainly attributed to cacao’s naturally
occurring compounds, like epicatechin, which has anti-inflammatory and
antioxidant properties, and resveratrol, known for its neuroprotective effects.
Numerous studies have confirmed that cacao can benefit your blood vessels,
heart, nervous system and brain, and that it can help combat diabetes and other
inflammation-related conditions.

However, remember there’s good chocolate, and there’s bad
chocolate — if you’re picturing the usual sweet candy bars sold everywhere,
then you’re thinking of the latter. For you to truly reap the benefits of
chocolate, you must make sure you’re getting one that has a high cacao content,
and is low in sugar.

Basically, the higher the cacao content, the darker the
chocolate. However, cacao is very bitter owing to the beneficial polyphenols it
contains. Hence, if you’re looking for chocolate to obtain its health benefits,
choose organic dark chocolate that has a raw cacao percentage of 70 or higher.

If You Suffer From
Insulin Resistance, Eat This Dessert in Moderation

These cherry bites are a wonderful alternative to the usual
processed, sugar-loaded concoctions you see in stores, but take note that they
still contain fructose — mainly because of the cherries, dates and honey used.
If you are struggling with obesity
or any condition related to insulin resistance, moderate your consumption of
this dessert to prevent wreaking havoc on your health.

About Pete Evans

Pete Evans is an
internationally renowned chef who has joined forces with Dr. Mercola to create
a healthy cookbook that’s loaded with delicious, unique Keto recipes, ideal for
people who want to switch to a ketogenic diet. The “Fat for Fuel Ketogenic
Cookbook” is the perfect tool to help get you started on your ketogenic
journey.
CLICK HERE to order your copy now.

Pete has had numerous noteworthy
contributions to the culinary world. He has not only cooked for the general
public, but he’s also cooked a royal banquet for the Prince and Princess
of Denmark, a private dinner for Martha Stewart, and even represented his
hometown at the gala G?Day USA dinner for 600 in New York City. Pete’s
career has moved from the kitchen into the lounge room with many TV appearances
including Lifestyle Channel’s “Home show,” “Postcards from Home,” “FISH,” “My
Kitchen Rules” and “Moveable Feast.”

How to End the Autism Epidemic

By Dr. Mercola

In this interview, J.B. Handley, founder of Generation Rescue, discusses autism and what he believes can be done to help turn this tragic trend around. This is also the topic of his book, “How to End the Autism Epidemic.”

A Parent’s Worst Nightmare

Handley’s son has autism, and his personal experience ultimately motivated him to write this book. He describes the family’s experience, and what led them to take a nonconventional approach to their son’s treatment:

“My wife and I were what I would characterize as very mainstream parents, which meant that when our second son was born in 2002, we basically handed him to our pediatrician and did whatever he told us to do, which meant following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommended [vaccine] schedule.

We started to watch our son decline physically after every vaccine appointment at 2 months, at 4 months, at 6 months and at 12 months. He got eczema. His belly became distended. He had sleep disturbances. He had dark circles under his eyes. We kept going back into the doctor and saying, ‘What’s going on? What’s happening with him? Where is this coming from?’

We could never get a plausible explanation for what was happening. Then, shortly after my son turned 1 year old, he started to decline neurologically. He lost his words. He lost many of his normal mannerisms. He started doing these really unusual behaviors.

He started craving certain foods — all these things that somebody like you knows are red flags for a child heading towards autism. But at the time, we were ignorant to this and our pediatrician didn’t help us at all.

We were living in Northern California. We took our son to University of California San Francisco (UCSF) where they diagnosed him with severe autism. At the same time, we visited a Defeat Autism Now! (DAN!) doctor in Pleasanton … Dr. Lynne Mielke.

We were presented with two completely different worlds. At UCSF, autism was genetic. It was lifelong. He was likely to be institutionalized. There was nothing we could do about it, except to prepare ourselves.

But in Pleasanton, thirty miles away, autism was triggered by vaccines. It was an environmental illness. If you vetted the diet and started to do things differently, some of these children recovered completely. Here’s my wife and I, both educated at Stanford, both very mainstream, and we’re put at these crossroads for what to do for our son …

In our case, we went to the facts. We went to the reality of how our son had declined after being on a normal path of development. We ultimately made a decision that we did believe that the vaccines triggered our son’s autism. We did believe that biomedical interventions could work for him.

That opened a whole new door to us. Soon after that, in ’05, my wife and I founded Generation Rescue. The reason that we founded it was to share the information that we had learned with other parents. That’s where our journey began.”

Recovery Is Possible

Today, Handley’s son is 16, and has made dramatic improvement through biomedical intervention. He regained his speech, learned to read, and can go on long family trips without incident.

Still, he continues to be affected by autism, and this is a reality for many parents. While some children are able to make a complete recovery, others do not. Most, however, can make improvements. Even at 16, Handley’s son continues to improve, and new biomedical interventions are becoming available. Prevention is key, though, and making vaccination decisions are an important part of that.

“I think, in many ways, that the jury is in on this. My book is bolstered by the fact that two of the titans of the mainstream autism medical community have changed their tune through depositions, and now support the things that parents have been saying for decades.

I think that those two scientists [Dr. Andrew Zimmerman and Dr. Richard Kelley], who people don’t know about, and the way they’ve changed their tune are going to have a dramatic impact on this debate.

We’re talking about scientists from the Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins University, arguably the pre-eminent institution in the country focused on autism, who are saying exactly what parents are saying — that in a vulnerable subset of children, vaccines are, in fact, the trigger of autism.”

Autism Triggers Are Pernicious

Like Handley, I believe vaccines can play a role in autism, although it’s certainly not the sole factor or trigger. In the last half of the 20th century, not only has the vaccine schedule grown, with many vaccines being added, but our food supply has also been inundated with glyphosate, and there’s been a radical increase in the exposure to electromagnetic fields.

All three of these factors are pernicious, and there’s evidence showing all three can play a role in autism development. Heavy metal exposure is another factor.1 That said, the connection between autism and the introduction of vaccines in many children is quite clear.

“The interesting science that’s come about since the mid-2000s and beyond concerns this notion of an immune activation event in the brain of a child. We believe that immune activation events are actually what causes autism. The question is, ‘What’s the trigger for those immune activation events?’ because there could be a myriad of triggers.

In the emerging science, which has largely been developed in other countries, it shows us how aluminum, specifically — aluminum, which the whole purpose of it being in a vaccine is to hyperstimulate the immune system — in certain vulnerable kids, can create a persistent immune activation event, sort of a simmering inflammatory event in the brain.

That simmering inflammatory event, if it happens during critical phases of brain development, can cause a child to head into autism. Those analysis models, unlike the epidemiology the CDC did that was not that helpful trying to discern causation, most analysis models are showing us, with some very specific data about the brain, just how a vaccine can trigger an immune activation event that then leads to autism,” Handley says.

Aluminum Hyperstimulates the Immune System

Aluminum is a known neurotoxin, and in vaccines, the aluminum is in a nanoparticulate form, which when injected makes it all the more problematic. When injected, macrophages, which are part of your immune response, are sent to the injection site, where they gobble up some of that aluminum.

“The [macrophages] grab the aluminum that they don’t know what to do with. Some portions of those macrophages end up in the brain. They sit there, and it’s called biopersistence. The aluminum just sits in the brain and the body doesn’t know how to get it out,” Handley says.

There’s also evidence that aluminum exposure may be, at least in part, responsible for the massive rise in autoimmunity among children as well. In short, the aluminum hyperstimulates the immune system, causing it to overreact to proteins that otherwise would not cause a reaction.

Vaccine Makers Are Not Liable for Harm

Today, children routinely receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6, and there are estimates that 1 in approximately 35 children develop autism. That’s nearly 3 percent of the U.S. population. In 1985, children received 23 doses of seven vaccines: diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP), oral polio (OPV) and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR).

The autism rate was also vastly lower. Depending on the data source, the autism rate in 1985 was between 1 in 5,000 or 1 in 10,000. In 1986, in large part due to the brain damage being caused by the DTP vaccine, the National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act (NCVIA) was passed, which partially indemnified vaccine makers from liability for CDC recommended vaccines for children.

Later, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court insulated vaccine manufacturers from all liability when someone is harmed or killed by a childhood vaccine.

“When you go to vaccine court in Washington D.C., the lawyers who are paid money to fight your claim are Department of Justice (DOJ) employees. The judge who’s there to adjudicate your claim is a special master who has full control over the proceeding. You have no jury. You have no normal judicial process. That 1986 [law] ushered in a rapid introduction of many different vaccines.

Today, I would argue — and I do quite strongly in the book — we’re simply giving too many vaccines for too many diseases that are not that dangerous. In return, we have this massive explosion in chronic disease. It’s a trade. We’re slightly reducing certain acute illnesses. We’re having an explosion of many chronic illnesses.

I think the question for Americans and the question for parents is, ‘Is it worth it? Is the reduction in disease worth the trade-off?’ That’s actually the conversation I wish we could have. We don’t have a realistic risk-reward conversation. Vaccines are portrayed cartoonishly as offering you instant protection from whichever disease you get vaccinated for. The truth is more complicated than that.”

Evaluate Risks Versus Rewards

Handley suggests that parents need to weigh the pros and cons, and ask themselves which health risks they’re willing to take to protect their child against any given disease.

“Do I want [my child] to get a rotavirus vaccine if the risk is asthma? Do I want [them] to get a Haemophilus influenza type B (Hib) vaccine if the risk is a lifetime of diabetes or some other autoimmunity and a much higher risk of autism?

By not acknowledging the very real risks of these vaccines, parents aren’t in a position to make an informed decision about whether or not they’re worth it for them,” Handley says.

“I personally would support an immediate return to the 1985 schedule. Children were not dying in the streets. It wasn’t the Dark Ages. We have to do something radical if we’re going to change this chronic disease epidemic …

Autism, for a family, is devastating. I think one of the things that really frustrates me about this epidemic is the whitewashing of autism … The truth is most children with autism can’t speak … [they] will never live alone … [they] will never have a job. Most children with autism require daily and hourly care [and] die early.

We can never look away from the severity of this epidemic or this disability for most of the children affected by it. It’s because of the devastating nature of the disability that it puts such a strain on families.

My heart goes out to families that are lower income, work two jobs or they’re struggling to make ends meet, and then autism gets dropped into their lives. It’s simply devastating and untenable. We’ve got to do something about it.”

Do Your Homework

One of the most questionable vaccines, in my view, is the hepatitis B vaccine, which is given on the day of birth. Not only does it contain aluminum, there’s simply no real justification for administering it to all healthy newborns, as hepatitis B can only be contracted from IV drug abuse, sexual activity with an infected partner, a blood transfusion using contaminated blood, or from an infected mother.

It would be far more sensible to simply screen pregnant women for the disease, and only give the vaccine to infants whose mothers actually test positive for hepatitis B.

The Hib vaccine also contains aluminum, and it, too, is given very early on, the first dose usually administered at 2 months old. Handley points out that parents should do their own research and make an informed vaccination decision for their child.

“You need to gather data on each vaccine and decide for yourself, ‘Is the risk-reward there for me?’ If you do that research and you decide it’s there for you, all the more power to you. This is a free country. I believe in medical freedom. I believe that everybody should use whatever intervention they think is appropriate for their child.

What I don’t believe in is that a parent should walk into an office with a child who’s 2 months old, having not done the research, hand your child over to the pediatrician and they stick the child with six vaccines and you can’t name what any of them are. By the way, that’s a mistake I made.

That’s the message I try to send to other parents: ‘Be way more informed. Be way more vigilant.’ There are pediatricians in every market who are more open. Find those pediatricians and work with them. Focus on the health of your child, not on implementing the CDC’s vaccine schedule.

Recognize that there are many pediatricians who are motivated by their insurance company to have really high vaccination rates. Because of that, they may not have your child’s best interests at heart. They may have the bonus that they’re getting from their insurance company at heart. That’s really inappropriate but happens all the time …

I have is a singular motivation: to tell the truth and to save as many children as possible from the fate that befell my son … Guilt wrote this book, if you will. The two ways that I found to deal with that guilt is, one, to focus on my son in helping him get better, and, two, to warn as many parents as possible.”

Vaccine Experts Call for Vulnerability Screening Prior to Vaccination

In depositions in a trial in Tennessee, Zimmerman and Kelley make it clear that children really should be screened before their first vaccine. If screening for individual susceptibilities were in fact done, many or most vulnerable children would be spared from being harmed by vaccines.

“They bring up specifically in their depositions things like the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation, a gene that can limit the ability of the body to detoxify,” Handley says. “They bring up maternal autoimmunity history as a potential risk. Any signs of food allergies, any signs of other illnesses, obviously.

But there’s this list of screens that you could do in advance that might save a meaningful portion of these children from harm. What’s so frustrating about that is, in order for those screens to be put into place, there has to be an acknowledgment of causation.”

The Lies Being Told

Handley spends an entire chapter tackling the mainstream notion that the science on vaccines is “settled;” that the studies have been done and no harm could be found. “It’s simply a lie,” Handley says. To be convinced, however, you may need to actually read through the studies yourself. If you do, you’ll find the “evidence” that vaccines don’t cause autism is based on a single vaccine, the MMR, and they only looked at a single ingredient, thimerosal.

“Anybody with the willingness to spend a little bit of time on this topic will grow disenchanted with the things they’re saying because they’re unsupportable. They’re lies. They’re propaganda. I find it deeply disturbing that our public health officials will lie that blatantly,” Handley says.

“When you have people like Zimmerman and Kelley from Kennedy Krieger, who are now supporting what the parents are saying, I think the lie falls down even further. I think they’re going to really have to answer to this book and explain why they’re saying the things they’re saying …

[Three] of the scientists who’ve done some of the most amazing work on aluminum, and how it biologically causes autism, wrote letters to [the CDC] … [saying]:

‘Based on the work that I have done with aluminum, I think that the words on your website saying vaccines don’t cause autism [aren’t] true. I encourage you to look closer at the aluminum science that I’m including here in my letter. This is a devastating crisis that I think we have answers for.’

These are international renowned scientists writing to our CDC and saying that, ‘The things you’re representing to the public aren’t true. You need to look at this topic again.’ This is not parents versus the CDC. These are esteemed international scientists. These are clinicians from Kennedy Krieger …

The gig is up. The truth is there for anybody willing to look. I really hope that groups of people will come together and say, ‘Enough is enough. Enough with the lies. There is 1 in 36 children [with autism]. It’s unacceptable. We have a clear answer for at least the primary trigger of what’s going on. We need to start saving children, moving those with great risks out of harm’s way to help end the autism epidemic.'”

A major part of the problem is the fact that the CDC has been captured by the drug industry. Not only is the CDC in charge of implementing and promoting the vaccine program, it also holds dozens of vaccine patents,2,3 while simultaneously being in charge of vaccine safety and tracking autism rates!

Add to that the revolving door between the CDC and the vaccine industry — the transition of Julie Gerberding from being director of the CDC to being an official in Merck’s vaccine division is one of the most egregious ones — and you have a situation in which the agency charged with safety simply will not lift a finger to fulfill that responsibility.

Join Us at Generation Rescue’s Autism Education Summit

Handley cofounded Generation Rescue with his wife in 2005. Actress Jenny McCarthy is the president. The organization assists parents who want to initiate biomedical intervention for their autistic child, and hold an annual Autism Education Summit. This year, it’s held September 28 through 30 in Dallas. I’m scheduled to be keynote speaker.

This summit is a wonderful opportunity for parents to hear what’s new directly from the cutting-edge doctors who are treating children with autism biomedically.

You can also learn more in Handley’s book, “How to End the Autism Epidemic,” which includes depositions from Zimmerman and Kelley — two pre-eminent members of the Kennedy Krieger Institute, the leading autism institution in the country — in which they unequivocally state that vaccines are causing autism.

A third deposition covered in the book is by Dr. Stanley Plotkin, by many considered the godfather of the vaccine industry. Dr. Paul Offit brought him into Voices for Vaccines, a pharma front group, as an expert witness for a legal case in which a husband and wife were in disagreement as to whether or not to vaccinate their child.

“[Plotkin] sat through an eight-hour deposition [and] was destroyed by the opposing council. What was revealed was many of the tricks, false narratives and disturbing ways of thinking that people in the vaccine industry think through, because Plotkin was one of the thought leaders of that.

We learned everything from the fact that he tested vaccines on mentally retarded children — his words, not mine — babies in prisons and orphans. We learned the ugly history of vaccine trials.

But he clearly acknowledges that the DTP vaccine doesn’t really work, and that the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine trials were in fact quite faulty, because they had no placebo group. They received an aluminum-containing vaccine … His conflicts of interest are also spelled out in detail.

He’s literally making millions of dollars a year from vaccine makers, yet projects himself as this independent spokesperson for vaccines. He bailed on the trial the next morning after giving his deposition.

He refused to be an expert witness. Luckily, we were able to obtain that deposition in a public manner. It’s not sealed. I think anybody who reads his words in that deposition will be blown away by how the, arguably, default leader in the vaccine industry actually thinks. It’s very damning and very disturbing,” Handley says.

More Information

Lastly, you can also follow Handley on his blog, JBHandleyBlog.com. Among his most recent articles is “Did Vaccines Save Humanity?” in which he reviews disease statistics and vaccine data to answer that question.

Between 1900 and today, there’s been a massive decline in mortality, especially mortality from infectious diseases, and mandatory vaccination advocates are often quick to attribute that to the success of mass vaccination programs. However, scientists have identified a number of many other factors that contributed to lower mortality rates.

Things like improved standards of living, clean water, refrigeration, sewage, less crowded living quarters and so on have all contributed to fewer complications from infectious diseases. Importantly, the data show dramatic declines in mortality from infectious diseases occurred well before the introduction of vaccines against the disease in question. According to Handley:

“They estimate that vaccines’ role in the overall decline in mortality from 1900 to today was somewhere between 1 and 3.5 percent of the total decline [in mortality] …

Facts are facts. Data is data. Anybody who tells you that billions of lives have been saved because of vaccines, or whatever number they try to use, or that it’s the primary driver [of infectious disease reduction] is insane. Because the facts don’t support them and say differently.

If you go to Africa, where they’re still living in crowded conditions and still have horrible water, and they still don’t have sanitation or refrigeration, and you vaccinate every kid, you might kill more children than you help because the other conditions haven’t been bolstered.

We actually learned that through … a study4 by Dr. Peter Aaby, a renowned epidemiologist of vaccines. What he found is that in [Guinea-Bissau] … children who got the DTP vaccine were five times more likely to die than those who didn’t.

The reason for that, as far as he could explain, was that it weakened their system so much that they were far more susceptible to other infections, because they were living in a highly infectious environment.

So, if you go after public health and you don’t do it with totality, and you think vaccines are going to solve the problem, they’re not going to solve the problem. There’s no data that says they would.”