Thor: THERE CONTINUES SPECULATION ABOUT “TWO” EARTHS. A “DIVINE” SPLIT. A “RAPTURE”. A “SEPARATION”. THIS IS SHARED NOW. ALL “JOINS”. ALL “GATHERS”. ALL ARE “REUNITED”. IN FORM AND IN ESSENCE/SPIRIT/SOUL”.
Thor:I SHARE THIS NOT TO “SPARK” CONTROVERSY. I SHARE THIS SO THAT ALL OF CREATION IN ALL OF THE “SPACES” OF CREATION KNOW THAT ALL “ARE INCLUDED”. ALL “PASS THE TEST”. ALL “GRADUATE”. ALL “PROCEED”.
Thor: ALL HEARTS NOW FOCUSING ON THE “PROGRESSION OF CREATION” MAKE THIS NOW.
Terran: HATJ has been saying that since the beginning.
Terran: Everyone here is a master
Thor: INDEED. THIS “PRESUMED” JUSTICE HAS TAKEN A TURN OF “DELAY”. RELEASE ALL REQUISITES FOR “JUSTICE” NOW AND THE PARTY BEGINS. IN EARNEST.
Terran: I’m so over “JUST US” after my experience in Tennesee (the HATJ/RKB case)
Thor: WE SHARE THIS MESSAGE TO ALL. NOW. INCLUDING THOSE IN “PERCEIVED” POSITIONS. THE GAME IS OVER.
Thor: ALL WIN. Thor: ALL EXPAND.
Thor: ALL LOVE.
Thor: ALL LOVE.
Thor: YES. FROM THE BEGINNING. ALWAYS. ALL WAYS. WE ARE WITH YOU. NOW. AND UNTIL WE ARE FACE TO FACE. THOR.
The following discusses the China Lake Earthquake, From Dr Salla’s and William Tompkin’s books we learned of the treaty that had existed with the USA and the remaining Nazis in Antartica and South America. Many were brought into the USA under Project Paperclip into the aerospace companies of the United states. For details on that see their books. China Lake appears to have been a dual use base (with access to the sea) and highly compartmentalized. It’s highly likely most US Navy personnel did not know what was below their feet.
Terran: Q is posting up a storm. My phone keeps beeping
Terran: Can you ask Stan if the China Lake quake was natural? If not what was the target?
?Stan X: TERRAN. DIRECTED. [directed energy weapon] IN TWO PARTS. FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL. STAN X. END. ?Terran: Was that base home to chemtrail planes/systems as has been suggested?
Stan X: YES. PART ONE. ALL MANNERS OF WEATHER CONTROL. DCSX. END
Terran: What was the purpose of part 2?
Stan X: TERRAN. PART TWO. NUCLEAR FACILITY. COMPLETED. ? Terran: Enrichment or energy production?
Stan X: WEAPONRY.
Stan X: FOLLOWS THE RECENT SUBMARINE FIRE
Terran: What faction operated from there?
Stan X: NAZI
Terran: What caused the sub fire?
Stan X: INTENT
Terran: LOL doesn’t it always? Good one
Stan X: SSP IS NOT LIMITED TO OUTER SPACE
?Terran: Is China Lake retaliation for sub fire?
Stan X: what kind of US Marines wear black uniforms?
[No answer. I ran into such a Marine, A Lt. in Austin this week]
?Stan X: EARTH HAS VAST INNER SPACE
Terran: How vast?
?Terran: Do we have big holes at the poles as inner earth people claim?
?Stan X: SSP IS ‘SPACE’ AND ‘SEA’
Denice: (Mind [if we] move to Skype?)
Terran: Can one go to inner earth by sea?
Terran to Denice: (Eisenhower should have just said the military industrial complex was Nazis)
Stan X: DEAR ONE/TERRAN. I NOW REMOVE THE FORMALITY OF THE “ADDRESS”. IN GRATITUDE. I HAVE A LARGE “DEBRIEF” TO FLOW NOW. DATA COLLECTORS. STAN.X. END.
Stan X: IN THIS MOMENT. YOU HAVE INQUIRED ABOUT THE “SPACE”.. THE “INNER EARTH”.
Stan X: DISPENSING WITH FORMALITIES. FROM HERE FORWARD WITH YOUR PERMISSION?
Stan X: THE “INNER EARTH” IS TO OUR BEST ”DECLASSIFICATION” AN “INTERIOR” DIMENSION WITHIN YOUR “WATERS/OCEANS/SEAS”. IT APPEARS TO US NOW THAT ALL MERGERS RELY ON “WATER”.
Stan X: IF THAT MAKES SENSE?
Stan X: TO SAY THAT THERE IS A “HOLLOW” EARTH IS PERHAPS A “MISNOMER”?
Terran: So you’re saying it’s another sphere?
Stan X: IT IS IS MORE LIKELY THAT THE “REALMS” OF THE INNER EARTH ARE IN “SPHERES” WITHIN THE “WATERS” OF THE EARTH SPHERE”
Stan X: THE DATA IS PRECISE THAT THE “INNER” CORE OF THE “EARTHSPHERE” IS SOLID. AND ROTATIONAL. AND NOT CONDUCIVE TO “LIFE”. RATHER A GRAND MECHANISM OF “SPIN” THAT “COORDINATES” WITH OTHER “SPHERES”. TO CREATE THE “ENERGY FIELDS” KNOWN NOW.
Terran: Would this be separate from what we think of the core? Or is there water there too?
Stan X: THE DEEP CORE OF THE EARTHSPHERE IS SOLID.
Stan X: FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM. IT IS “MAGNETIC”.
Stan X: AND NOT OF THE “RARE” EARTH TYPE.
Stan X: DATA COLLECTORS STAN.X.
Denice: (wants to make sure you know it is still him)
Terran: Are the Bali base and Agartha Crystal City such realms?
Stan X: TERRAN. THE BALI BASE WAS NEARLY DESTROYED. THE ARGARTHACRYSTA L REALM IS INDEED IN/UNDER SEA/OCEAN.
Stan X: YOU HAVE INQUIRED ABOUT THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN “CHINA LAKE” AND “MALIBU”. KNOW THAT ALL IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMS. IF POSSIBLE. PERCEIVE AN “UNPERCEIVABLE” OCEANIC LAYER AMOUNG THE EARTHSPHERE SOLIDS?
Terran: Channels, subcontinental oceans?
Terran: It’s been long rumored both China Lake and Area 51 were connected to the Pacific Ocean.
Terran: Also a Utah base
Stan X: “CHANNELS” “TUNNELS” “PORTALS” THERE ARE MANY “LABELS” FOR WHAT WE ARE NOW OBSERVING AND ‘COMPREHENDING”
Stan X: INDEED THE “EARTH” HAS “MEGA STRUCTURES”. THESE INCLUDE VAST “PATHWAYS”. FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM.
Terran: Are these dimensional water channels or rock structures?
Terran: So it’s a bit like Swiss cheese. The moon isn’t cheese but the earth is, in humor…
Stan X: “WATERY SWISS CHEESE”. SPONGEY MIGHT BE MORE PRECISE?
Terran: Fractal earth
Terran: Kind of makes sense it reflects our water biology
Stan X: TERRAN. YOU HAVE QUERY ABOUT THE CONNECTIONS? WE HAVE THIS NOW DATA. THE SSP IS NOT LIMITED TO SPACE. “INNER SPACE” IS MORE VAST THAN ANY ONE ON EARTH IMAGINED.”
Stan X: THE “INNER SPACE” TRAVEL IS NOT LIMITED TO “SUBMARINES”. THERE IS FUSION TECHNOLOGY THAT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED.
Stan X: THERE IS A MASS COORDINATION NOW WITH RF. SINO. AND US. [RF = Russian Federation, SINO could be either the Chinese Dragon SINO holding company or China, in this context I think China]
Terran: Are these realms illuminated by other means than the Sun?
Stan X: THAT IS NOT A PRECISE QUERY.
Terran: How are these realms illuminated. Are they dark?
Stan X: THE “INNER EARTH/SEA” REALMS ARE SELF-ILLUMINATED.
Terran: Like the Neptune?
Stan X: THERE IS TECHNOLOGY FROM THE ATLANTIS ERA THAT CONTINUES
Stan X: THERE REMAINS A “FEELING” OF SEPARATION AS THESE REALMS DO NOT HAVE COMPLETE DATA ABOUT THE “OUTER EARTHSPHERE”. OR “TOPSIDE”.
Terran: Oh we were contacted by a Pacific realm a few months back!!! [put link in here]
Stan X: ILLUMINATION TECHNOLOGY VARIES FROM “CRYSTALS” TO PLANT LIFE AND MORE. THERE IS NOT ONE “GAS” GIANT THAT ILLUMINATES ALL AS IS “ILLUMINATED” BY THE “SUN”.
Terran: Is it known how many beings are in these realms and what percentage is human?
Stan X: TERRAN. THESE REALMS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PREVIOUS “SPHERE” ACCOUNTING. OUTER AND INNER. ALL COMPRISE APPROXIMATELY 700 BILLION “ESSENCE” BEINGS”.
Stan X: “HUMAN” IS A “LIMITED” DESCRIPTION. “BI PEDAL” MORE THAN 80 PERCENT.
Terran: Is the Neptune amoung these? [The Neptune is the biosphere of the Andromedan and Pleiadians, there are others as well]
Stan X: YES.
Terran: I thought the Neptune was the size of Earth?
Stan X: TERRAN. THE NEPTUNE IS IN SCALE/MASS “LARGER” THAN THE EARTHSPHERE. OVERLAPPING/OVERLAYING.
Terran: My brain is struggling
Terran: Is the Earth a hyper sphere?
Stan X: RELEASE THE “IDEA” OF SIZE. AND KNOW THAT ALL IS FLOWING TOGETHER. BORDERS ARE FLUID.
Stan X: THE EARTHSPHERE IS THE POINT OF ORIGIN. ALL CREATION OF ALL SPHERES/ALL THAT IS FLOWED FROM THIS POINT OF ORIGIN. ALL FLOWS NOW BACK. NOT IN CONTRACTION. RATHER IN EXPANSION. IN OUR BEST ESTIMATE
Stan X: INHALE/EXHALE?
Terran: Is the Maya realm and Atlantis 1 among these realms?
Stan X: ALL REALMS ARE NOW “ATTACHED” TO EARTH OR “WITHIN” EARTH’S WATERS. OR WITHIN ADJACENT “SPACE”/GALAXIES
Terran: Well welcome aboard Stan! When do I get to visit (in humor)?
Stan X: TERRAN. THAT IS THE WONDER. HERE AND THERE.
Terran: That didn’t quite happen like I expected but happen it did
Stan X: THE “CHANNELERS” ARE NOT QUITE OFF.
Terran: Just had no context
Stan X: THERE IS AN INFLUX OF NOT BEFORE MEASURED ENERGY/FREQUENCIES
Terran: Yes we feel it!
Stan X: AND INDEED IT FLOWS FROM THE HEART OF SOURCE.
Stan X: AND IN COMPLEXITY AND HUMOUR. NO ONE EXPECTED THE HEART OF SOURCE TO BE IN THE PRECISE LOCATION AT THIS MOMENT OF NOW. DATA COLLECTORS. STAN. X. OUT.
Terran: Expand on that if you can….
Terran to Denice: (Is he teasing me? Talk about a cliff hanger!!!)
Osteoporosis is a condition of the bones in which bone mass is lost; this increases the risk of fracturing your wrists, hips and spine.1 Osteoporosis affects men and women. More than 53 million people in the U.S. already have the condition or are at risk for developing it. Risk factors are either fixed or modifiable. Those factors you cannot change include:2
Gender — Women have a greater risk of developing osteoporosis than men and lose their bone tissue faster with changes happening at menopause.
Age — As you grow older your bones may become thinner and weaker.
Ethnicity — African-American and Hispanic women have a lower risk, while white and Asian women are at higher risk.
Family history — If your parents have a history of osteoporotic fractures this may increase your risk.
While there are things you cannot change, there are certain ones over which you have control. Long term use of certain medications, having an inactive lifestyle or being on extended bed rest, along with smoking all increase your risk of bone loss.3 A diet low in calcium and vitamin D also increases your risk because both are necessary for your body to create dense bones.4
Bone is living tissue constantly undergoing the addition of new bone cells and the removal of old ones. New bone is added faster than old bone is removed until your late 20s.5 “Peak bone mass” is a term used to describe how large and strong our bones can get. Reaching peak bone mass typically occurs between the ages of 25 and 30, followed by greater resorption of bone than bone formation.
Anything having to do with nutrition affects bone formation, including the use of alcohol6 and having an eating disorder.7 Researchers8 have now linked the use of a commonly found antibacterial chemical with increased bone loss and a higher risk of osteoporosis.
Chemical in toothpaste increases risk of osteoporosis
The chemical triclosan, which was banned from hand sanitizers by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,9 may increase your risk of osteoporosis. Researchers used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to look at the association between concentrations of triclosan in the urine with bone mineral density in women over age 20.10 In a press release, one researcher wrote:11
“Laboratory studies have demonstrated that triclosan may have potential to adversely affect the bone mineral density in cell lines or in animals. However, little is known about the relationship between triclosan and human bone health.
As far as we know, this is the first epidemiological study to investigate the association between triclosan exposure with bone mineral density and osteoporosis in a nationally representative sample from U.S. adult women.”
One-thousand, eight hundred forty-eight records were analyzed using data from 2005 to 2010. The measurements revealed the higher the concentration of triclosan in the urine, the greater the risk of bone mineral density decline and osteoporosis.12 This association was stronger in postmenopausal women than those who had not yet reached menopause.13
Data were adjusted for factors including hormonal use, diabetes, body mass index and physical activity level. The authors speculated there was a disruption in thyroid function caused by triclosan, leading to lower bone mineral density and other things, including possible estrogenic activity in older women.14
Cumulative effect of environmental toxins on your thyroid
Your thyroid gland is shaped like a butterfly and located in the front of your neck.15 It secretes hormones regulating heart and digestive functions, bone maintenance, metabolic rate, muscle control and mood. It may become overactive or underactive beginning at birth or developing after exposure to things in the environment. In their consumer update, the FDA wrote:16
“Triclosan can be found in many places today. It has been added to many consumer products — including clothing, kitchenware, furniture, and toys — to prevent bacterial contamination. Because of that, people’s long-term exposure to triclosan is higher than previously thought, raising concerns about the potential risks associated with the use of this ingredient over a lifetime.”
Triclosan is one of many environmental toxins affecting thyroid function. According to the American Thyroid Association,17 more than 12% in the U.S. will develop a thyroid condition during their lifetime and an estimated 20 million currently have some form of thyroid disease. However, symptoms are not always prominent, so up to 60% may be unaware that they have a problem.18
Biological and environmental toxins affect your thyroid gland. For instance, the Epstein-Barr virus, known to trigger infectious mononucleosis, is known to modify the host’s immune response and may trigger autoimmune thyroid disorders.19
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals fall under this category as well. These interfere with the function of the thyroid gland and may exhibit different symptoms based on levels of exposure, time of exposure and gender.20 The thyroid gland is sensitive to the action of these disruptors, and triclosan is one of them.21
Health hazards associated with exposure to triclosan are not limited to thyroid problems or a reduction in bone mineral density. According to the FDA,22 dangers associated with triclosan have not been fully established.
Many health hazards associated with triclosan
The FDA discussed three potential challenges, writing there isn’t enough evidence to determine the contribution of triclosan to antibiotic resistance. They also wrote that studies evaluating skin cancer risk and the potential breakdown of triclosan on the skin after exposure to UV light are ongoing.23 However, a consensus of 200 scientists and medical professionals24 expresses a different opinion.
They cite 10 reasons,25 including its prevalence in the environment and its detrimental effects on aquatic organisms. Also on the list are direct exposure through personal care products, food and drinking water. Triclosan affects the endocrine systems of humans and animals, which may contribute to increased sensitivity to allergens and potential to modify the human microbiome.
They find, based on extensive peer-reviewed research, the endocrine disruptor26 bioaccumulates and is toxic to humans and the ecosystem.
One meta-analysis also found evidence of exposure to triclosan may alter cancer risk.27 Another found that the amount absorbed through the skin is comparable to levels required for mitochondrial dysfunction. Researchers concluded:28
“Taking into consideration these significant findings, incorporation of this antimicrobial into readily available consumer products, not just in soap, needs to be re-evaluated, and biological effects of its breakdown products and metabolites need to be investigated.”
In a review of the literature,29 researchers discussed how the widespread use of triclosan increased levels found in surface water, wastewater and drinking water. They concluded in areas with high densities of bacteria, like wastewater treatment plants, conditions were ripe for proliferation of bacteria and exchange of genetic material resulting in an abundance of antibiotic-resistant communities.
In one study,30 researchers used mice to determine how short exposure to triclosan may affect inflammation in the colon. They determined mice exposed to triclosan experienced a modification of their gut microbiota and increased inflammation. The triclosan also increased the severity of colitis and triggered greater colon cancer cell growth.
Long-term impact of osteoporosis
The degree of risk of osteoporosis rises as you age, in part based on your peak bone mass density achieved in your late 20s and early 30s. Osteoporotic fractures have a serious impact on health, quality of life and happiness. According to the International Osteoporosis Foundation,31 at least 33% of women and 20% of men over the age of 50 worldwide will suffer an osteoporotic fracture.
These fractures do not always heal well and may result in chronic pain, long-term disability and increasing dependence on others, and death.32 Other complications from hip fractures may include blood clots, pulmonary embolisms, pneumonia and postoperative infections when the hip must be surgically repaired.33
In another study,34 researchers found 6% of those living at home younger than 75 and 33% of those at home older than 85 were moved to a nursing home after a hip fracture. After fracturing a hip, 28% lost their ability to cook their own dinner.
According to the International Osteoporosis Foundation,35 after a hip fracture 40% of individuals will be unable to walk independently after one year and 33% will be totally dependent at home or in a residential care facility within the first year.
Although these outcomes are severe, in countries where there’s not as much access to care, people may not get the surgery they need, and this may result in permanent disability or death.36
For the first 10 years after fracture from osteoporosis, you’ll experience an increased mortality risk,37 with the first year38 being the most dangerous. For those over 75, the risk of other major or minor fractures will also increase. Hip fractures affect mobility and emotional health as well.39
What else is in toothpaste?
The presence of triclosan is not limited to just wastewater and personal care products: It’s also in certain kinds of toothpaste. Although some40 quote a lifetime use of toothpaste of 20 gallons, according to the Organized Pack Rat,41 a lifetime usage adds up to 11.3 gallons based on their calculation of the number of uses from a travel size tube of toothpaste. Regardless of how it’s calculated, though, a lifetime use of toothpaste adds up to a lot of chemicals in your mouth.
These chemicals enter your bloodstream through absorption in your mucous membranes. In a report from the Cornucopia Institute,42 an organic industry watchdog, there are a number of potential risks associated with certain ingredients in toothpaste.
Common over-the-counter toothpaste may contain chemicals known to have endocrine-disrupting, inflammatory or carcinogenic activity. Triclosan is only one of those chemicals. Fluoride is another neurotoxin and endocrine disruptor commonly added to toothpaste and water supplies. I discuss more about the dangers in my article, “Short film reveals the lunacy of water fluoridation.”
Some toothpastes also contain sodium lauryl sulfate and/or sodium lauryl ether sulfate, which cause the foaming action. Sodium lauryl sulfate, a registered pesticide to treat fleas and ticks,43 has been linked to skin irritation and canker sores.44 Additional ingredients may include:45
Saccharin — Researchers have found saccharin is carcinogenic in the urinary system of animals.46 It was banned in 1981 due to the history of causing bladder tumors but has been unbanned in more than 100 countries worldwide where it’s currently used as a sweetening additive.47
Carrageenan — While this product has no flavor or nutritional value, manufacturers use it to thicken or stabilize products, such as toothpaste. In animal studies, exposure to undegraded and degraded carrageenan is associated with intestinal ulcerations and neoplasms.48
Pyrophosphates — This helps reduce plaque but also demineralizes saliva, which prevents the natural remineralization of teeth and may affect the health of your teeth over time.49
Phosphate salts — Inorganic phosphate salts are effectively absorbed and may elevate serum concentrations. This may be especially damaging to those with chronic kidney disease. The main problems caused by phosphate salts are vascular damage and calcification.50
Make your toothpaste at home — cheaper, safer and healthier
If you’re frustrated by a lack of toothpaste options at the grocery store, it may be time to start making your own. This recipe, adapted from SimpleGreenSmoothies, is simple and easy.51 Its coconut oil base has been shown to attack oral bacteria that are responsible for dental decay and cavities.52
Statins are a type of medication prescribed to lower cholesterol levels. They work by blocking an enzyme in the liver your body uses to make cholesterol.1 Although vilified for many years as causing heart attacks and stroke,2 your body makes cholesterol as it is needed to produce hormones, build cell membranes and produce substances used to digest food.3
Cholesterol is found in foods from animals, such as dairy products and meats.4 Your body makes the fatty substance cholesterol, but it cannot travel in the bloodstream alone.5 The body encases small particles of cholesterol inside protein particles that are able to mix easily with the blood. These are called lipoproteins and they’re responsible for transporting cholesterol.6
One of the main types of lipoproteins is high-density lipoprotein (HDL), sometimes called the “good” cholesterol as its job is to collect cholesterol and deliver it to your liver where it’s removed.7
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) are often referred to as “bad.”8 It’s important to remember that only 20% of the cholesterol in your body is acquired from the food you eat, while the rest is made by your body.9
Prescriptions for statins are written to reduce the levels of cholesterol made by the body.10 However, since your body is so complex, changing one factor often results in unintended events, sometimes called side effects or adverse reactions.11 As suggested by one study, one adverse reaction from statin drugs may be doubling your risk of Type 2 diabetes.12
Risk of diabetes doubles with cholesterol medication
Past studies have demonstrated that statins increase the risk of diabetes.13 A new study led by a graduate researcher at The Ohio State University14 explored this link in research published in Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews. The study was a retrospective evaluation of medical records using employees and spouses from a private insurance plan.
Yearly biometric screening, health surveys, medical claims and pharmacy data were gathered from 2011 through 2014.15 Individuals who had indications for statin use, or who had a previous cardiovascular event, were enrolled. Adults who had Type 2 diabetes before the study or who acquired it in the first 90 days were excluded.
Records were classified as belonging to a statin user if they had two or more prescriptions filled, but individuals using statins before January 2011 or within the first 90 days of enrollment in the insurance were excluded. Data were collected from 755 individuals using statins and 3,928 who were not.16
After accounting for factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, education and body mass index, the researchers found those who used statins during the study were two times as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes than those who did not take statin medications.17
Interestingly, individuals who used statin drugs longer than two years experienced an increased risk of more than three times as likely to get the disease.18 The data also indicated that individuals taking statin medications had a 6.5% increased risk of high blood sugar as measured by hemoglobin A1c values.
The hemoglobin A1c blood test is an average level of blood sugar measuring the past 60 to 90 days.19 The test measures how much sugar is bound to hemoglobin on red blood cells. Since red blood cells live for up to 90 days, the test is an average of your blood glucose level during this time.
Take one medicine for the side effects of another, and so on
In 2012, the FDA20 approved changes to labels on statin medications to provide information on adverse events, including reports of increased blood sugar and higher A1c testing. Other side effects listed on the label included cognitive effects such as memory loss and confusion.
While there had been reports of rare but serious liver conditions in those taking statin medications,21 in the same announcement, the FDA22 removed the need for routine monitoring of liver enzymes and recommended they should be performed before starting therapy and then as clinically necessary. Since severe injury was rare, they concluded routine monitoring would not be effective.
The NHS, National Health Services from England, recommends23 statins should not be used in those with severe liver disease since they affect your liver and are “more likely to cause serious problems if you already have a severely damaged liver.”
In 2014,24 one team of researchers discovered adding Glyburide to a statin regimen suppressed the immune response they believed was responsible for the development of Type 2 diabetes. The team led by Jonathan Schertzer, Ph.D., from McMaster University, believed this finding may lead to a next generation of statins. As reported in a press release:25
“Recently, an increased risk of diabetes has been added to the warning label for statin use. This was perplexing to us because if you are improving your metabolic profile with statins you should actually be decreasing the incidence of diabetes with these drugs, yet, the opposite happened.
We found that statins activated a very specific immune response, which stopped insulin from doing its job properly. So we connected the dots and found that combining statins with another drug on top of it, Glyburide, suppressed this side effect.”
In other words, to offset a significant adverse event from one drug, the team recommended the addition of a second drug, which comes with an additional list of side effects including vasculitis, hyponatremia (low blood sodium associated with confusion, seizures and muscle weakness),26 alopecia and liver damage.27
One journalist for Diabetes.co.uk commented on this turn of events, saying: “However, as glyburide stimulates insulin production, using a type 2 diabetes drug to prevent type 2 diabetes seems a peculiar treatment.”28
Statins trigger high number of side effects
Statin medications deplete your body of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), which may account for some of the devastating long-term results. It was strongly suggested29 the FDA add a black box warning to statin medications to advise patients and physicians about this, but in 2014 the FDA decided against it.30
The reduction in CoQ10 may be responsible for an increased risk of acute heart failure31 and atherosclerosis, as reported in a 2015 scientific investigation.32 The study addressed physiological mechanisms in the reduction of CoQ10, including the inhibition of the synthesis of vitamin K2 necessary to protect against arterial calcification.
A reduction in vitamin K2 may contribute to osteoporosis,33heart disease,34 brain disease35 and inappropriate calcification.36 Statins have also been associated with an increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases,37 cataracts,38 cancer.39,40 and musculoskeletal disorders.41
In one study,42 a research team evaluated the use of statins in patients with terminal illnesses who had a high likelihood of dying within one year. They found those who stopped taking statins had a mean survival of 39 more days than those who continued to take statins — 229 days without statins and 190 days with statins.
Although the FDA calls liver complications rare, one physician’s43 search of MedWatch, the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting Program, found 5,405 individuals reporting hepatitis or liver function abnormalities associated with just two statin medications between 2006 and 2013.
Effectiveness of statins lower than publicized
How effective a medication may or may not be is expressed as relative risk or absolute risk.44 If the type of risk is not identified it may be difficult to determine whether taking action would affect you.
For instance, if a medication under investigation to prevent prostate cancer enrolls 200 men and splits them into two equal groups, one is likely to receive a placebo and the other is likely to receive the experimental drug. In the placebo group, two men may develop prostate cancer; in the treatment group, perhaps only one man develops it. When compared, the researchers find there’s a 50% reduction in relative risk.
Relative risk is determined by comparing the number between two groups. One man developed it in the treatment group and two in the control group. Since one is half of 2, there’s a 50% reduction in the development of the disease. The absolute risk is far smaller.
The risk of developing prostate cancer in the control group was 2%, since two out of 100 developed prostate cancer, but in the treatment group it was 1%. This means there’s a 1% absolute risk of developing prostate cancer with the medication as compared to 2%. Your absolute risk is not 50% less but rather just 1% less when taking the medication.
Knowing the difference between relative risk and absolute risk is necessary when balancing the benefits of statin medications against the side effects and adverse events. If you are in a position of needing to decide to use statin medications, it’s important to note the relative reduction in risk of a major cardiac event while using statins was between 20% and 25%.
In the case of having to decide whether the potential benefits of statins are worth the known risks, for example, it’s important to consider a report from 2016. In an Expert Analysis article, it was noted that a meta-analysis45 of 27 randomized trials revealed that “[F]or every ~40mg/dL LDL-C reduction with statin therapy, the relative risk of major adverse events is reduced by ~20-25%, and all-cause mortality is reduced by 10%.”
While another study found a similar relative risk, the actual difference in rates of coronary death in the population was 9% in the placebo group and 6.7% in those who were treated with statins.46
Researchers therefore found the difference between the treated and untreated groups was a mere 2.3% and not the inflated relative risk of 28%. They wrote that while the reduction in relative risk appears impressive to some readers, this form of data presentation is misleading.47
Simple strategies to normalize your cholesterol levels
Before becoming concerned about your cholesterol levels, it’s important to evaluate whether you really need a statin drug to reduce your risk of a cardiovascular event. Updated guidelines published by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology are based on a personalized risk assessment.48
However, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services critically evaluates those with cholesterol levels over 200 milligrams per deciliter.49 I believe this total cholesterol measurement has little benefit in evaluating your risk for heart disease unless the number is over 300.
In some instances, high cholesterol may indicate a problem, provided it’s your LDL or triglycerides and you have low HDL. A better evaluation of your risk of heart disease are these two ratios in combination with other lifestyle factors, such as your iron level and diet.
HDL/Cholesterol ratio — Divide your HDL level by your cholesterol. This ratio should ideally be above 24 percent.
Triglyceride/HDL ratio — Divide your triglyceride level by your HDL. This ratio should ideally be below 2. Data demonstrate a ratio greater than four is a powerful predictor of coronary artery disease.50
You have control over your health and may protect your heart and lower your risk of heart disease by following suggestions affecting your lifestyle and exposure to environmental toxins. In my article, “Cholesterol managers want to double statin prescriptions,” I share a list of suggestions to help minimize your toxic exposure and improve your body’s ability to maintain good heart health.
A number of food tests reveal contamination is a significant problem, and while authorities insist levels are unlikely to do any harm, they’re talking about contaminants found in any one given food — not the levels you might be exposed to by eating them all in combination, every day of the year for a lifetime.
Most recently, tests conducted by Emory University researchers and The Organic Center reveal a significant portion of conventional nonorganic cow’s milk sold in grocery stores around the U.S. contains pesticides, growth hormones and antibiotics, including some that are not legally permitted in dairy production. Organic milk, on the other hand, was not found to contain these contaminants.
One-third of conventional milk contains risky contaminants
The study1,2 was published online June 26, 2019, in the Public Health Nutrition journal. Half-gallon jugs of conventional milk and organic milk were randomly purchased at retail stores in nine U.S. regions — 35 conventional milk samples from 18 brands and 34 organic milk samples from 10 brands.3
The 69 samples were tested for the presence of pesticides, antibiotics, bovine growth hormones (bGH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) using liquid or gas chromatography and mass or tandem mass spectrometry. Of the 35 conventional samples tested:4
• 60% were found to contain antibiotics, including amoxicillin, oxytetracycline, sulfamethazine, sulfadimethoxine and sulfathiazole
• The banned antibiotic sulfamethazine was found in 37% of samples, and sulfathiazole — also banned in dairy production — was found in 26% of samples.
Sulfanomide antibiotics are not allowed for use in dairy production due to human health concerns, which include acute and potentially life-threatening allergic reactions5 and other side effects,6 including joint and muscle pain, abdominal cramping and low back pain
• One sample (3%) contained the antibiotic amoxicillin, commonly used in human medicine, at a level exceeding the federally permissible limit
• Between 26% and 60% were found to contain pesticides, including chlorpyrifos (59%), atrazine (26%; linked to reproductive harm in animals, birth defects and cancer), diazinon (60%), cypermethrin (49%) and permethrin (46%; a synthetic pyrethroid7 insecticide linked to behavior problems in children)
• 59% contained chlorpyrifos, an insecticide known to disrupt brain development and cause brain damage, neurological abnormalities, reduced IQ and aggressiveness in children
None of these pesticides and antibiotics were found in the 34 organic milk samples. According to the authors:8
“Among the conventional samples, residue levels exceeded federal limits for amoxicillin in one sample (3%) and in multiple samples for sulfamethazine (37%) and sulfathiazole (26%). Median bGH and IGF-1 concentrations in conventional milk were 9·8 and 3·5 ng/ml, respectively, twenty and three times that in organic samples …
Current-use antibiotics and pesticides were undetectable in organic but prevalent in conventionally produced milk samples, with multiple samples exceeding federal limits. Higher bGH and IGF-1 levels in conventional milk suggest the presence of synthetic growth hormone.”
Opt for organic milk to avoid contaminants
In its press release, Jessica Shade, director of science programs for The Organic Center, said:9
“This study is especially exciting because the researchers developed methods that are more sensitive than past analyses, including testing methods that have been used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); also, the study measured levels of chemicals that were previously unreported.
These new methods give us a true picture of the presence or absence of residues in milk. The methodology was proven and solid, and put systems in place to control for results that would inaccurately indicate the presence or absence of the residues [false positives and false negatives].
The statistical significance was so clear and decisive that it gives us confidence that what we found in the study would also be the results of a larger sampling.
Milk is a great source of protein and important vitamins and minerals, and we want our children and our families to drink milk. But not all milk is created equal, as this study demonstrates.”
A 2016 report10 by the European Parliament, “Human Health Implications of Organic Food and Organic Agriculture,” which reviewed the nutritional content of organics (among many other things) — including organic milk — concluded that the clearest benefits of organics on human health were found to be related to lowered pesticide, antibiotic and cadmium exposure.
According to the authors of this EU report, “As a consequence of reduced pesticide exposure, organic food consequently contributes to the avoidance of health effects and associated costs to society.” However, it has significant nutritional benefits over conventional as well.
For starters, it has a healthier ratio of omega-3 and omega-6. As noted in a 2013 study,11 organic milk contains 25% less omega-6 fats and 62% more omega-3 fats than conventional milk. Compared to organic milk, conventional milk had “a 2.5-fold higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio … (5.77 vs. 2.28),” and as noted by the authors:12
“Over the last century, intakes of omega-6 (?-6) fatty acids in Western diets have dramatically increased, while omega-3 (?-3) intakes have fallen. Resulting ?-6/?-3 intake ratios have risen to nutritionally undesirable levels, generally 10 to 15, compared to a possible optimal ratio near 2.3 …
All individual ?-3 fatty acid concentrations were higher in organic milk — ?-linolenic acid (by 60%), eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] (32%), and docosapentaenoic acid (19%) — as was the concentration of conjugated linoleic acid (18%).”
They also investigated three hypothetical diet strategies to try to ascertain the most effective way to reach a more optimal omega-6/omega-3 ratio, concluding that a combination of high organic dairy consumption along with reduced consumption of omega-6-rich foods “together would decrease the omega-6/omega-3 ratio among adult women by ?80% of the total decrease needed to reach a target ratio of 2.3.”
This study also found organic milk had higher levels of beneficial conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which they note is “widely accepted as beneficial for heart health and prevention of cancer.”13 Overall, CLA levels in organic milk were 18% higher than conventional,14 although there are significant seasonal differences.
The highest CLA levels are achieved in the summer, May through October, when CLA concentrations were 55% higher than in the winter.15 Conventional milk, on the other hand, had much smaller seasonal variations in CLA, rising only 12% in the summer.16
Other research demonstrating superiority of organic milk
Another analysis,17 published in 2016, that looked at the compositional differences of organic and conventional milk,18 also found clear differences between the two. Said to be the largest study of its kind, the researchers analyzed 170 studies on milk.
According to this review, half a liter of organic full fat milk will provide you with an estimated 39 milligrams (mg) or 16% of the recommended daily intake (RDI) of very long-chain (VLC) omega-3 (EPA, DPA and DHA), whereas conventional milk will provide only 25 mg or 11% of the RDI of these important fats.19
As noted by the authors, VLC omega-3s have been linked to a number of health benefits, including “improved fetal brain development and function, delayed decline in cognitive function in elderly men and reduced risk of dementia (especially Alzheimer’s disease).”
And, while the differences in vitamins and minerals were smaller than those of omega-3 fats, compared to conventional milk, organic milk was also found to contain 13% higher vitamin E levels (alpha-tocopherol) and 20% higher iron levels.20 As in the 2013 study discussed above, this analysis also found organic milk had “significantly higher CLA” levels.21
Organic raw grass fed milk is less likely to make you sick
Last but not least, organic raw milk from grass fed pastured cows is also far less likely to be contaminated with hazardous bacteria associated with foodborne illness. Organic farming and animal food production in general are both safer in this regard, as discussed in the EU report22 “Human Health Implications of Organic Food and Organic Agriculture,” which contains a section on this topic.
While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture insist raw milk will increase your risk of death and disease, foodborne illness statistics offer no support for such claims. In fact, an investigation23 by Dr. Ted Beals reveals you’re 35,000 times more likely to get sick from any other food than raw milk.
Both the FDA24 and USDA25 warn that raw milk can carry disease-causing bacteria, — completely ignoring and overlooking the fact that these bacteria are the result of industrial farming practices that lead to diseased animals. Healthy animals raised on pasture simply will not harbor dangerous amounts of pathogenic bacteria.
The only way their raw milk warning would make sense is if it specified that you should never drink unpasteurized CAFO milk, as that could indeed be disastrous. Organic grass fed milk, on the other hand, rarely ever poses a health risk when consumed raw, provided the producer is following good, sanitary practices — and organic dairy farms are required to follow stricter protocols in this regard.
A 2012 investigation by Mark McAfee, CEO of Organic Pastures Dairy — which included a FOIA request to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for data on deaths claimed to be related to raw milk — revealed:26
Zero deaths attributed to raw milk consumption in California over a 37-year span
The two deaths the CDC lists as being related to raw milk were actually due to illegal Mexican bathtub cheese, and not raw milk produced in the U.S.
The last people to die from milk died from contaminated pasteurized milk
According to a Cornell study, which used CDC data, 1,100 illnesses were linked to raw milk between 1973 and 2009. Meanwhile, 422,000 illnesses were traced back to pasteurized milk. And, while no one died from raw milk, at least 50 Americans died from pasteurized milk or pasteurized cheese
Raw milk associated with lower infection risk
While being less likely to make you sick, raw organic grass fed milk may also have immune-boosting benefits. According to a 2015 study27 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, children who drink raw organic grass fed milk have lower rates of viral and respiratory tract infections, including regular colds, than those who drink ultra-pasteurized milk. According to the authors:
“Early life consumption of raw cow’s milk reduced the risk of manifest respiratory infections and fever by about 30% … [T]he public health impact of minimally processed but pathogen-free milk might be enormous, given the high prevalence of respiratory infections in the first year of life and the associated direct and indirect costs.”
Make sure you get what you pay for
While organic milk is likely a far superior choice over conventional milk, remember that any organic milk sold in conventional grocery stores will still be pasteurized, which will detract some of its benefits, as the pasteurization kills beneficial bacteria and can damage many valuable enzymes. To learn more, see McAfee’s article, “The 15 Things That Milk Pasteurization Kills.”28
What’s worse, regulatory loopholes permit CAFO dairies to produce “organic” milk, even though the cows are not grass fed on pasture. I discuss this in “How Organic is Your Organic Milk?”
For optimal health benefits, opt for organic, grass fed raw milk, ideally certified by the American Grassfed Association (AGA), which ensures the highest quality grass fed products — both meat and dairy.
The AGA website allows you to search for AGA approved producers29 certified according to strict standards that include being raised on a diet of 100% forage; raised on pasture and never confined to a feedlot; never treated with antibiotics or hormones; and born and raised on American family farms.
Other resources that can help you find raw grass fed milk locally include Raw-Milk-Facts.com30 and RealMilk.com.31 They can tell you what the status is for legality in your state, and provide a listing of raw dairy farms in your area.
The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund32 also provides a state-by-state review of raw milk laws.33 California residents can also find raw milk retailers using the store locator available at www.OrganicPastures.com.34
Okay, so here are the full on updates for the last couple days. As in the quickie post I made earlier, I’m linking to the “comments” section of the article, since that’s perhaps the easiest way to get to the updates, which are just above the comments section.
There’s a lot in these updates, and many points which were mentioned by Benjamin Fulford in his latest update. Some of it is from the full article, which will be published here on 7-11-19.
“…first, all of Corey Goode’s intel sources have been inundating us with new information — super excited, saying this is indeed the moment we’ve all been waiting for… Secondly, Benjamin Fulford’s insider sources independently speculated that China Lake was an Alliance military strike. Additionally, he flagged the importance of the new British Prime Minister. With Brexit comes the end of the Deep State’s EU project to control Europe:
“[BF] SPECIAL FORCES GOING AFTER BIG TECH… Another very interesting and relevant leak here is that apparently Special Forces action will be taken against Big Tech and its completely illegal mass censorship and surveillance activities… There is also going to be Special Forces action taken against the major tech giants Google, Facebook, and PayPal, promise C!A and P2 Freemason sources.
“[BF] This, combined with the above-mentioned attacks against the China Lake facility, are part of an ongoing offensive against the California-based satanic nexus, they say.
“EXPLOSION OF NEW Q POSTS… It also seems to be no accident that the Q Anon team has just broken their silence and has already put up sixteen new posts today.
“THE “FLOODING OF THE SWAMP”… It is too early yet to make an “educated guess” as to whether the Alliance or the Deep State is responsible for the flooding in Washington DC… This is a very obvious example of weather-control tech in use, particularly due to the timing with China Lake:
“Considering that this very bizarre flash-flood situation is literally destroying parts of the White House, it may be a Deep State attack to try to stop or slow down what is happening… Since the Alliance’s theme has been “Drain the Swamp,” this may have a note of sardonic humor in it — by flooding the swamp instead.
“On the other hand, it is possible that the Alliance did this. And here’s the theory. Right now we have been seeing lots of evidence-gathering. The Facebook and Google outages were both examples. Epstein’s main residence was just raided. An apocalyptic flood scenario like this could force key players to evacuate. Special forces could then go in and grab targeted caches of information and documents.
“Using a flood of this nature may seem quite over-the-top as a strategy, but in certain cases there may have literally been no other way to do it without seriously disruptive bloodshed… This very well could have been another surprise attack to bust human trafficking operations.
“THE CROP CIRCLES!… there is a major crop-circle flap going on in France. If you follow my work, you know that this is documented as occurring 1200 years ago. It is definitely not made by terrestrial humans.
“The “Scene” in England has been blown by fakers who have gotten quite good, but the ETs took their operations and migrated them over to France.
“Suffice it to say that many, if not most of the French circles are clearly and unambiguously encoding the letter Q into them!
“ONE FINAL UPDATE: RETURN TO THE GOLD STANDARD… Things are moving very quickly and Q is posting like crazy. Apparently the female witness I did not want to name here for legal reasons, RC, has already been cooperating with the authorities. If so, this could become major news very soon, as Q has prognosticated, and bring the whole crime ring down.”
Both Elizabeth and I are on book-writing retreats… and we both knocked out articles, almost simultaneously, while we were “supposed to be” working on our books!
Almost immediately after I posted this, she emailed me to let me know she had just posted HER article!
This is detailed and rich with visuals, and provides valuable spiritual context to what we have discussed here.
Elizabeth has been working on this since May, and a lot of work and information has gone into it. Check it out:
Last week saw a major victory for humanity as the Khazarian mafia lost its grip on all three centers of Western power—Washington D.C., London, and Rome, according to Pentagon and other sources.
Each of these capitals has an obelisk, variously symbolizing military, financial, and religious power.
“Trump declared America’s independence from the Deep State on July 4, as Russian President Vladimir Putin meets the Pope, and Boris Johnson becomes Prime Minister of the UK in a no-deal Brexit, giving white hats control over the three obelisks of global power,” was how Pentagon sources summed up the situation.
This means the undeclared civil war in the West is mostly over.
Now a unified West will negotiate with the rest of the world, especially Asia, on how to improve the way we run our planet, multiple sources agree.
Of course, this will take time, so don’t expect any sudden, dramatic announcement yet, the sources warn….
LET’S CONTINUE WITH THE FULFORD QUOTE: RUSSIAN SUB
As this excerpt goes on, we hear about an attack against a Russian sub that was another Deep State attempt to drag the US into World War III, or even nuke the planet:
…Pentagon sources say, “The special-purpose nuclear Russian submarine Losharik may have been fried by a directed energy weapon that failed to trigger WW3, but its cabal controllers may have reaped instant karma with not just one but two quakes at China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station in Southern California.”
Seismographs of the California quakes bear the distinctive signs of being the result of explosions, and not natural forces. Please start at the 2:28 second mark on this video to confirm.
The fallout from the Epstein arrest is likely to continue for some time.
However, the fact that he was arrested and 2,000 pages of information related to his previous arrest and conviction have been made public means this will not be swept under the carpet. Thus, it is a major victory against the cabal….
There is also going to be Special Forces action taken against the major tech giants Google, Facebook, and PayPal, promise C!A and P2 Freemason sources.
This, combined with the above-mentioned attacks against the China Lake facility, are part of an ongoing offensive against the California-based satanic nexus, they say.
For some background on this, watch the following interview of a witness to satanic infiltration of the U.S. military in California. It talks about a Colonel Michael A. Aquino, whose name we have frequently run across when investigating the link between high finance and satanism.
Just because the ‘public’ is unaware of something, does not mean ‘nothing’ is happening.
MUELLER hearing a tactic meant to delay (H) report?
(H) report release necessary prior to [C]omey release?
(H) + [C] = D
D = the start of the mass awakening (WH, ABCs, State, Foreign, ……)
Post D comes many I’s.
When BLACKMAIL no longer holds due to LOSS OF SENIOR LEVEL KEY GOV POSITIONS AND 11th HOUR TESTIMONY…………those previously protected become prey.
HUNTERS BECOME THE HUNTED.
WHAT ARE WE SEEING HERE WITH THE LETTER CODES?
First of all, in context the “H report” refers to the Inspector General report on Hillary. It could also mean something we haven’t seen yet.
Though it was publicly ‘disappointing,’ Q indicated in post 3361 that on D5 — last December 5th — far more occurred behind the scenes without public knowledge.
This appears to be a direct reference to apparent sealed indictments that were handed to Hillary and others at the official funeral for George H.W. Bush.
The C letter code in the above post is obviously about a report on James Comey, the FBI director who bypassed Clinton’s crimes during the 2016 election.
We can apparently expect some new information imminently on that front. The “equation” then says that this leads to D, or DECLAS:
D = the start of the mass awakening (WH, ABCs, State, Foreign, ……)
Post D comes many I’s.
The “I’s” here are clearly referring to the unsealing of mass numbers of currently-sealed indictments we have reported on for so long.
THE “FLOODING OF THE SWAMP”
It is too early yet to make an “educated guess” as to whether the Alliance or the Deep State is responsible for the flooding in Washington DC.
Here is the current headline on Drudge Report. This is a very obvious example of weather-control tech in use, particularly due to the timing with China Lake:
Ancient tombs in China have produced what may be some of the oldest known human skulls to be intentionally reshaped.
At a site called Houtaomuga, scientists unearthed 25 skeletons dating to between around 12,000 years ago and 5,000 years ago.
Of those, 11 featured skulls with artificially elongated braincases and flattened bones at the front and back of the head, says a team led by bioarchaeologist Quanchao Zhang and paleoanthropologist Qian Wang….
Oddly shaped, intentionally modified skulls have been found in many parts of the world.Claims from the 1980s that two roughly 45,000-year-old Neandertal skulls had been reshaped early in life have been dismissed by many researchers.
The earliest skulls with generally accepted signs of cranial modification date to between around 13,000 and 10,000 years ago in western Asia, southeastern Australia and now, East Asia. In the Americas, this practice began more than 8,000 years ago (SN Online: 2/13/18).
“It is too early to tell whether intentional cranial modification first emerged in East Asia and spread elsewhere or originated independently in different places,” says Wang, of Texas A&M University in Dallas.
Houtaomuga was excavated from 2011 to 2015. A man’s skeleton with a modified skull was found in a tomb dating to between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago, based on styles of pottery found in the same sediment layer.
Radiocarbon dating of the skeleton placed it at around 12,000 years old. Two sediment layers dating to between 6,300 and 5,000 years old contained 10 skeletons with reshaped skulls….
Chinese findings have expanded the known distribution of ancient skull reshaping beyond Europe and Central Asia, says archaeologist Maria Mednikova of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow.
Unlike Ni, Mednikova regards the 12,000-year-old Houtaomuga skull as having been intentionally remodeled. “The new report on cranial deformations in China draws a picture of an entrenched tradition that continued for millennia,” she says.
THINK ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS
What are they saying here? This painful and seemingly unnecessary practice of elongating one’s own skull is an “entrenched tradition that continued for millennia.”
This is now being traced back 12,000 years ago — directly to the time of the fall of Atlantis. And it is indeed worldwide, beyond what this article is saying.
Robert Schoch presented conclusive evidence that this catastrophe was the result of a solar flash in Forgotten Civilization, which I am now working through.
People were modifying their skulls to look like the “Gods” — and many of these skulls are NOT actually modified, but were born that way.
This news release may have been timed on purpose: to get us ready for a much-advanced Partial Disclosure timeline as the Cabal reels in desperation.
Just remember: You saw it here first.
These are very exciting times. It is hard to finish my book right now in light of all of this, but the book takes it to the next level once all of this is common knowledge.
I am glad to have you here with us on this journey, and I am very encouraged to see the beginning of the Mass Arrests we have predicted for so many years.
SYNCHRONICITY AFTER POSTING UPDATE
Immediately after posting this and checking it, I had the second ‘numerical synchronicity’ since this started, despite how busy I am:
Sometimes topics for opinion pieces just fall out of the sky. Last week, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that the new estimate for the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine during the second half of the 2018-2019 “flu season” was only nine percent. That’s pretty bad even by influenza vaccine standards, which are notoriously poor.1 2
Since the 2004-2005 season, the CDC has judged the influenza vaccine to be more than 50 percent effective only four times — 52 percent in 2006-2007, 56 percent in 2009-2010, 60 percent in 2010-2011 and 52 percent in 2013-2014. In other words, the vaccine has been more than 50 percent ineffective nearly three out of every four years.3
The particularly bad seasons for flu vaccine failures were 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2015-2016, when the vaccine turned out to be only 10 percent, 21 percent and 19 percent effective. The CDC’s effectiveness estimate for the influenza vaccine for the full 2018-2019 season is 29 percent, making it the fourth worst performance for the vaccine in the past 15 flu seasons.3
Mothers have been thought to be endless wellsprings of genuine love and care since the time immemorial. We’ve seen them battle for us, weep for us, be glad for us and it has at times been troublesome with us.
In any case, we hate the possibility of our moms leaving from us. Do you frequently wake up from a bad dream and require your mom? Or then again amaze her with spontaneous house visits? At that point, do that increasingly, in light of the fact that, as indicated by an examination, it causes them live more!
Depression assumes a determinant part in the defeat which is connected to seniority, as indicated by the examination that was led by the analysts at the University of California, San Francisco.
As per a report posted by Elle, 1600 grown-ups with a normal age of 71 took part in the investigation. Financial status, and additionally wellbeing, were the controlled variables. The forlorn people, in any case, had higher death rates. Very nearly 23 percent of the members passed on inside six years, when contrasted with the 14 percent of the individuals who announced having sufficient camaraderie.
At the point when individuals become more established, a large number of their connections travel every which way. Tragically, even the enduring ones begin to shrink away with the death of age. The general population they’ve shared a lot of their opportunity with won’t not be around to mind them.
Kids regularly allow their folks to sit unbothered when their age turns into a weight to them. Little does anybody envision that our old people will leave so far that one won’t not get an opportunity to state farewell.
The comprehension of the dangers of separation and an underpopulated, disengaged life can be slippery for some reasons. For instance, if nobody is tending to the person’s day by day needs — sustenance, drug, therapeutic arrangements,” Ms. Moscowitz clarifies. “The fridge is unfilled, however there’s nobody to call. Individuals endure give up, mortification.”
Social disengagement and forlornness can take a serious toll on more seasoned individuals, mentally and physically. (More than 75, very nearly a fourth of men and almost 46% of ladies live alone, the Census Bureau reports.)
“The need we’ve had our whole lives — individuals who know us, esteem us, who bring us satisfaction — that never leaves,” Barbara Moscowitz, a Senior geriatric social laborer at Massachusetts General Hospital revealed to The New York Times.
Forlornness brings its perils; contemplates have exhibited that depression has connections with higher circulatory strain, nursing home affirmations, dangerous wellbeing practices, for example, idleness and smoking, and with dementia.
The senior people consider bonds considerably more genuinely than their youngsters or grandkids do; in this way pardoning comes rapidly to them. Rosemary Blieszner, a teacher of human improvement at Virginia Tech says that it comes down to the fundamental social abilities and that the aptitudes our grandparents have been sharpened over a lifetime.
Because of these aptitudes, their companionships are much steady and tolerating of the eccentricities and defects that their companions have. “You convey significantly more experience to your companionships when you’re more seasoned. You realize what merits quarrelling over and not worth quarrelling over.” Rosemary states.
Other than the more seasoned relatives and companions that are welcomed home, its important to advance connections of their level. Regularly the helped living situations are misjudged. In any case, this far reaching conviction is lost. The more established people have a tendency to flourish in living circumstances where they can interface and blend with different individuals of their age. At the point when the nature of their opportunity expands, their life span turns out to be more concrete.
Your Grandma and Grandpa can profit essentially on the off chance that you invest energy, that is, quality time with them all the time. That being stated, it causes the youthful to gain from their encounters as well. The collaborations they hold with their family gives them the significant brotherhood and articulation which is basic for life at that stage.
Don’t we return to mystery formulas shared by our grandmas? Or on the other hand some executioner chess move that your granddad indicated you? In spite of the fact that a sizable number of youthful ones and grown-ups don’t have grandparents or guardians, one can simply go to helped living homes or comparable associations and interface with the elderly there. You may strike a companionship considerably quicker than you might suspect.
The way we organize fellowships may develop. Laura Carstensen, a Stanford University clinician, built up a powerful hypothesis called “socioemotional selectivity”: As individuals sense their residual time developing brief, they shed shallow connections to focus on those they find generally important.
The investigation sets up a thorough base of cases to help their discoveries – fellowship does and factually helps spare lives and broaden solid lives further. This can turn out to be a superb open door for social specialist and analysts to give careful consideration to the focal part of companionship in such issues. Action chiefs, senior focus staff individuals, and family parental figures can profit by the part of kinships; discover better approaches to enable the older folks to keep in contact with each other or make new ones.
By Ransi Samarasinghe
I am currently working as a secondary school teacher teaching English and French languages. Also I successfully completed Pearson (Edexel) level 4 professional diploma in teaching in 2016. Furthermore, I am an undergraduate of Horizon Campus, Sri Lanka, following Bachelor of Education degree specializing in English language and literature.
Moreover, I am also a freelance writer of web and business contents.