|(Natural News) In case you haven’t noticed, biology and science are rapidly becoming obsolete. As the transgender lobby works feverishly to erase concepts like male and female, many of the institutions that have long functioned as bedrocks of our society are starting to unravel, including the field of medicine. Treating patients is becoming a minefield…|
By Anna Von Reitz
Authored By Ty Bollinger
How receptive are most oncologists to using alternative cancer therapies for their patients?
Not surprisingly, most medical practitioners are apprehensive to their patients utilizing cancer treatments that are not considered “standard of care.”
But not for the reasons you may think…which will be explained later in this article.
Most physicians interviewed in Dr. Ivy Lynn Bourgeault’s (from the Canada Medical Association) research said they opposed the use of alternative cancer therapies for their patients.
Yet, according to Dr. Bourgeault, “54% of people with cancer use alternative therapies and up to half of those patients completely abandon standard medical treatments in exchange for alternative methods.”
Some alternative cancer treatments include:
- Traditional Chinese medicine
- Naturopathic medicine
- Specific diets (such as low-fat or juicing diets)
- Energy therapies
- But the question remains… if standard medical methods were working, why are more than HALF of cancer patients turning to alternative medicine for healing? It has to be due to the failure of conventional cancer treatments, or at least ineffective in the eyes of the patients. [ Cassileth BR, Brown H. Unorthodox cancer medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 1988; 38:176-86 ]In a survey of cancer patients, 39% reported that their doctors reacted with disapproval concerning their request for alternative therapy and 4% refused to continue as their physician because they chose natural medicine.Still, in that same survey, it was reported that 30% of oncologists supported the use of alternative cancer treatments, while 12% were neutral.It is unnerving to discover that some doctors refuse to consider alternative cancer treatments when their patients clearly want to discuss and pursue those options.Interestingly enough, most physicians report being opposed to the alternatives by reason of insufficient knowledge, not because they’re ineffective.
However, 83% of the doctors surveyed reported that continuing education about alternative health services was of interest…but the source of information was primarily from their patients, not from peers or medical research.
A survey from Ontario and Alberta, Canada concluded with remarkable results; namely, 54% of practitioners felt conventional medicine could benefit from the concepts and methods of alternative medicine for the following reasons: most patients were not responding to conventional treatment, their patients requested it and admittedly, alternative medicine is proven effective in treating particular disorders.
Finally, whether medical practitioners believe in alternative treatments or not, research supports the fact that patients find them helpful, even if it just increases their optimism.
So the question is,… if doctors are open and willing to learn about alternative medicine to treat cancer, and their patients are turning to non-conventional cancer treatments…why isn’t more education recommended to oncologists?
Two words: Flexner Report. Due to an alliance between the American Medical Association (AMA) and big business (the Rockefellers and Carnegies) over 100 years ago, the medical schools in the USA focus solely on prescription drugs for cancer treatment while actively turning people away from natural remedies.
How can we counteract this policy? One solution is to enthusiastically support the patient’s right of choice when it comes to their bodies, as long as all the information has been presented and discussed openly between the doctor and patient. After all, this is still the “land of the free,” right?
The research shows that there is clearly a need for more openness between doctors and their patients with regard to alternative cancer treatments.
This is particularly important because many cancer patients are rejecting conventional treatments, sometimes permanently, in favor of alternative treatments. Interestingly, according to a poll at McGill Cancer Centre, in a poll of 64 oncologists, 58 indicated that they would not utilize chemotherapy for themselves or their families, due to the fact that this archaic, barbaric form of treatment is “too toxic.”
Long ago, medical doctors believed that draining an ailing person’s blood would purge the “evil” infection out of the body. And worse, medical doctors ignorantly recommended cigarettes to their patients using the mantra, “a pack a day keeps lung cancer away.” Both of these ridiculous suggestions have been proven to be pure quackery, but they were widely accepted by the “medical establishment” of their day.
Now is the time to openly discuss alternative cancer treatments as a real solution to conventional medicine.
For More Information Go Here: What Doctors Really Think About Alternative Treatments
By Anna Von Reitz
|(Natural News) A former NBC correspondent who spent 29 years with the network has been arrested and charged with allegedly asking a 9-year-old girl to send him sexually explicit photos. (Article by Eric A. Blair republished from TheGatewayPundit.com) Dr. Bruce Hensel, 71, who won an Emmy as medical correspondent for NBC, was charged Wednesday with asking…|
|(Natural News) The processes by which the brain learns new things and stores memories respond to input from the senses. German researchers have recently reported that scent processing might affect the brain’s memory centers. Their study covered the piriform cortex. This region of the olfactory brain interprets smells picked up by the nose’s olfactory receptors. The Ruhr…|
The TSA fails to appreciate the value of consent.
In June, my client Rhonda Mengert filed suit against the TSA for forcing her to expose herself and show them a feminine hygiene product she was wearing.
The strip-search of this 51-year-old grandmother was flatly against TSA’s own rules, yet strip-searches happen over and over at airports across the country, perhaps as a result of poor training, high turnover, failed background checks, or… well, who really knows why they can’t get it together?
What we do know from the TSA’s 24-page reply to the lawsuit (.pdf), a motion to dismiss filed Friday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, is that they don’t think they should be held responsible. Much of their rationale is the standard technical stuff that one expects of defense lawyers and we’ll respond to that in due course.
Deep State Takedown News: November 13th to 14th 2019
The post Deep State Takedown News: November 13th to 14th 2019 appeared on Stillness in the Storm.
In response to having his science-based content arbitrarily de-platformed from Google’s search results back in June, Dr. Joseph Mercola of the popular Mercola.com health website is boldly sounding the alarm about Google’s quiet entry into the pharmaceutical business, and how this is negatively affecting the overall functionality and integrity of Google’s search engine.
Despite being one of the most renowned physicians in the world, Dr. Mercola has effectively been blackballed from Google for supposedly spreading “misinformation” about health. Never mind the fact that he’s a board-certified physician with a highly successful practice, Dr. Mercola is now being treated by Google like some kind of “Russian bot” that has to be censored for violating the companies nebulous “community guidelines.”
The truth is merely that Dr. Mercola’s health philosophies, which are wildly popular all around the world, contradict the establishment narrative, and thus have to be silenced. And with Google now operating as its own pharmaceutical company, it only makes sense that this subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. is swapping out Dr. Mercola’s content and replacing it with Google’s pro-drug, pro-vaccine propaganda.