Striking Decline of Premature Births and SIDS During COVID

While the global lockdowns for the COVID-19 pandemic have had far-reaching ramifications, not all side effects have been bad. Two interesting changes noted by doctors around the world are a dramatic reduction in premature births1,2,3,4,5 and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). As explained by the Decan Herald:6

“About 1 in 10 US babies is born early. Pregnancy usually lasts about 40 weeks, and any delivery before 37 weeks is considered preterm. The costs to children and their families — financially, emotionally and in long-term health effects — can be great.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, babies born premature, especially before 32 weeks, are at higher risk of vision and hearing problems, cerebral palsy and death. The best way to avoid these costs would be to prevent early births in the first place.”

Curiously, during March and April this year, while most of the world enforced more or less strict stay-at-home orders, premature births plummeted by 90% in Denmark7 and 73% in Ireland,8 and nearly halved in Canada.9

Dr. Roy Philip, a neonatologist at University Maternity Hospital Limerick in Ireland, told the Deccan Herald10 he’s “never seen anything like these numbers” in his two-decade career.

Unusual reductions have also been reported in other countries, including Australia, the Netherlands and the U.S. The Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital in Nashville, Tennessee, for example, had about 20% fewer preemies than is typical for March.11 As noted in the Irish study, posted on the preprint server medRxiv June 5, 2020:12

“An unprecedented reduction in [preterm birth] PTB of [very low birth weight] infants was observed in one health region of Ireland during the COVID-19 lockdown. Potential determinants of this unique temporal trend reside in the summative socio-environmental impact of the COVID-19 dictated lockdown.

Our findings, if mirrored in other regions that have adopted similar measures to combat the pandemic, demonstrate the potential to evaluate these implicated interdependent behavioral and socio-environmental modifiers to positively influence PTB rates globally.”

Why Have Premature Births Dropped?

It’s still not known why the premature birth rate has dropped so dramatically. Doctors discussing the issue on social media13 with their associates have brought up the possibility that it might be because pregnant women have had more rest and less work stress.

While one can hardly say the pandemic has brought a general reduction in stress — quite the opposite — pregnant women may still have felt greater than normal support from family members.

Perhaps they got greater amounts of sleep. Staying at home may also have protected them against infections in general, which can increase your risk of pregnancy complications. Other possibilities include a significant reduction in air pollution.

Could It Be Related to Fewer Maternal Vaccinations?

One factor that has not been openly addressed is the reduction in maternal vaccinations. While I’ve not been able to locate any statistics on maternal vaccination rates before and during the pandemic, it seems reasonable to assume that many may not have gotten otherwise routine vaccinations for the simple fact that non-emergency medical appointments were, in many areas, during certain timeframes, canceled.

Health officials have also expressed worry about dropping childhood vaccination rates during the pandemic,14 so it’s likely (but not confirmed) that maternal vaccination rates have declined as well. In California, for example, childhood immunization rates plunged by 40% in the weeks after the first lockdown orders went into effect.15

While the scientific evidence is far from conclusive, some studies suggest maternal vaccinations might raise the risk of preterm birth. One such study,16 published in the journal Pharmacy World & Science in 2007, found it raised the risk by anywhere from 4% to 25%, or 14% on average. According to this paper:17

“Data mining had indicated that maternal vaccination (among other factors) might be related to preterm birth. The following regression analysis showed that, the women who reported being vaccinated shortly before or during gestation had a slightly higher risk of giving preterm birth (O.R. = 1.14; 95% CI 1.04–1.25) as compared to the non-vaccinated group.

Whether the association between maternal vaccination and the risk for preterm birth found here is causal or not deserves further studies. Data mining, especially with additional refinements, may be a valuable and very efficient tool to screen large databases for relevant information which can be used in clinical and public health research.”

Another study, published in 2016, pointed out the difficulty in assessing the available data:18

“Heterogeneity across 16 studies reporting preterm birth precluded meta?analysis. In a subgroup of the highest?quality studies, two reported significantly increased preterm birth (risk ratios (RR) from 2.4 to 4.0) following severe 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH 1N1) influenza illness, whereas those assessing mild?to?moderate pH 1N1 or seasonal influenza found no association.

Five studies of SGA [small?for?gestational?age] birth showed no discernible patterns with respect to influenza disease severity (pooled odds ratio 1.24; 95% CI 0.96–1.59).

Two fetal death studies were of sufficient quality and size to permit meaningful interpretation. Both reported an increased risk of fetal death following maternal pH 1N1 disease (RR 1.9 for mild?to?moderate disease and 4.2 for severe disease).”

SIDS Rates Drop During COVID-19 Lockdowns

An article19 in Korean Wellness also highlights another curious trend. According to a Health Choice white paper20,21 by Amy Becker and Mark Blaxill published June 18, 2020, the death rate among children in the U.S. has mysteriously dropped during the lockdowns, from an average of 700 per week to fewer than 500 per week during the months of April and May.

SIDS Rates Drop During COVID-19 Lockdowns

While Becker and Blaxill22 admit there is still “no specific data on the SIDS trend during the pandemic,” the data does show that this drop is related to a dramatic reduction in infant death specifically, not older children or teens. Korean Wellness brings up the possibility that reduced vaccination rates may have played a role by reducing the number of infants dying from SIDS:23

“Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) or crib death (cot death in the U.K. and Australia) is the sudden, unexplained death of an infant under 1 year old. It is the leading cause of death for babies between 1 and 12 months old, according to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Perhaps the best evidence of the infant death and vaccination linkage occurred in Japan. In Japan, between 1970 and 1974, 37 infants died after DPT vaccinations. Alarmed MDs in one prefecture boycotted the vaccine. The boycott spread to the entire country. The Japanese government decreed that the minimum age for vaccination was to be changed from the American vaccination schedule (2, 4, 6 and 12 months) to 2 years.”

Infant Vaccinations May Be Driving SIDS Rates

Remarkably, after banning vaccinations for babies under the age of 2 in Japan, SIDS virtually disappeared.24,25 In the years that followed, Japan became known for having the lowest infant death rate in the world. In contrast, the U.S. has the highest infant mortality rate — and the highest vaccination rate as well. If infant vaccinations improve health and save lives, why do our statistics not support such claims?

As noted in a 2011 study looking at the possibility that vaccines might be causing biochemical or synergistic toxicity resulting in higher mortality:26

“In 2009, five of the 34 nations with the best IMRs required 12 vaccine doses, the least amount, while the United States required 26 vaccine doses, the most of any nation … Among the 34 nations analyzed, those that require the most vaccines tend to have the worst IMRs [infant mortality rates].

Thus, we must ask important questions: is it possible that some nations are requiring too many vaccines for their infants and the additional vaccines are a toxic burden on their health? Are some deaths that are listed within the 130 infant mortality death categories really deaths that are associated with over-vaccination? Are some vaccine-related deaths hidden within the death tables?

Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, ‘Crib death’ was so infrequent that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. In the United States, national immunization campaigns were initiated in the 1960s …

For the first time in history, most US infants were required to receive several doses of DPT, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. Shortly thereafter, in 1969, medical certifiers presented a new medical term — sudden infant death syndrome …

There is some evidence that a subset of infants may be more susceptible to SIDS shortly after being vaccinated. For example, Torch found that two-thirds of babies who had died from SIDS had been vaccinated against DPT … prior to death. Of these, 6.5% died within 12 hours of vaccination; 13% within 24 hours; 26% within 3 days; and 37%, 61%, and 70% within 1, 2, and 3 weeks, respectively …

The US childhood immunization schedule requires 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of 0.70 was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants.

When nations were grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges (12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26), 98.3% of the total variance in IMR was explained by the unweighted linear regression model. These findings demonstrate a counter-intuitive relationship: nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.”

Immunization Avoidance May Have Boosted Infant Survival

Korean Wellness quotes Australian researcher Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.:27

“Vaccination is undoubtedly the single biggest and most preventable cause of cot-death … The timing of 80% of the cot [crib] deaths occurring between the second and sixth months is due to the cumulative effect of infections, timing of immunizations and some inherent specifics in the baby’s early development.

In their white paper, Becker and Blaxill also note that:28

“One very clear change that has received publicity is that public health officials are bemoaning the sharp decline in infant vaccinations as parents are not taking their infants into pediatric offices for their regular well-baby checks.

In the May 15 issue of the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a group of authors from the CDC and Kaiser Permanente reported a sharp decline in provider orders for vaccines as well as a decline in pediatric vaccine doses administered. These declines began in early march, around the time infant deaths began declining …

Are fewer children dying because their parents are skipping their routine childhood vaccines? If lives are being saved during the pandemic, this is a question that urgently needs answering.”

The lowered infant mortality rate reported in the Health Choice white paper is also addressed in a June 16, 2020, commentary in The BMJ. Responding to the authors of a paper titled “Fewer American Infants Are Dying During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Why?” retired pediatrician Allan S. Cunningham writes:29

“During the first 11 weeks of 2020 (through March 14) there were 209 fewer deaths in U.S. children <18 compared to the same period in 2019 (7024 vs 7233).

During the 11-week period following the emergency declaration (through May 30) there were 1465 fewer deaths in US children compared to 2019 (5923 vs 7388).30 The difference is statistically highly significant …

Becker and Blaxill emphasized that the most pronounced mortality decline occurred in infants <1 year. This is confirmed by reviewing the most recent data.31 There was a substantial and highly significant decline from 2020 weeks 5 through 11 to weeks 12 through 22 (367 to 309 infant deaths per week) …

The suggestion that vaccinations could be one factor in the causation of SIDS is not new … until properly controlled trials are done we will be unable to confirm or exclude a causal role for vaccines.”

Simple Strategies Can Improve Infant Health

It’ll be interesting to see what conclusions can be drawn later on once we have more data and statistics, but if infant vaccinations have a detrimental effect and increase the risk of death, the dramatic drop in SIDS and premature birth during the pandemic would be quite instructive.

Aside from carefully considering the potential negative impacts of routine vaccinations, another simple strategy that can have a major impact is the mother’s vitamin D level during pregnancy.

I firmly believe optimizing your vitamin D during pregnancy is one of the most important things you can do for the health of your child. When a child is born deficient in vitamin D, his or her health can be significantly affected.

Research32 by GrassrootsHealth has shown pregnant women need a vitamin D blood level of at least 40 ng/mL (100 nmol/L) to optimize benefits. Having a level of 40 ng/mL during pregnancy has been shown to lower the risk of preterm birth by 59%, compared to having a level of 20 ng/mL.33 Other research34 have shown most women can reach a level of 32 ng/mL (80 nmol/L) when taking 4,000 IU’s (six times the RDA of 600 IU) of vitamin D per day.

So please, if you’re pregnant, make sure to get your 25 hydroxy D levels checked. Testing is important to see what your level is so you can adjust your dosage to fit your body’s requirements.

As discussed in several recent articles, vitamin D may also be crucial for lowering your risk of COVID-19. You can find more information about this, and how to most effectively raise your level if deficient, in “The Most Important Paper Dr. Mercola Has Ever Written.”

14 Patents in Every Fake Bite of Impossible Burger

Fake meat is all the rage, and although plant-based meat alternatives have been on the market for years, the industry is gaining speed, promoting its meatless ‘burgers’ as a sustainable solution to feed the world. The green image is an illusion, however, one predicated on a product that’s the epitome of unnatural.

Impossible Foods, which made headlines for its meatless burgers that “bleed” like real meat, is one of the leaders in the fake meat industry. Its website suggests its plant-based meat is better for you and the planet,1 but eating an Impossible burger is not akin to eating a plate full of vegetables.

Far from it, Impossible Foods should be called “Impossible Patents,” according to Seth Itzkan, environmental futurist and co-founder and co-director of Soil4Climate, who suggests fake meat products are destroying the environment by perpetuating a harmful reliance on genetically engineered (GE) grains while accelerating soil loss and detracting from regenerative agriculture.2

Impossible Foods Holds 14 Patents, Has 100+ Pending

Impossible Foods’ products resemble nothing found in nature. That’s why the company holds 14 patents, with at least 100 more pending. “It’s not food; it’s software, intellectual property — 14 patents, in fact, in each bite of Impossible Burger with over 100 additional patents pending for animal proxies from chicken to fish,” Itzkan told Medium, adding:3

“It’s iFood, the next killer app. Just download your flavor. This is likely the appeal for Bill Gates, their über investor. It’s a food operating system (FOS), a predecessor, perhaps, to a merger with Microsoft. MS-FOOD.

The business model is already etched in Silicon Valley — license core technology (protein synthesis) while seeking vertical integration of supply chains, which, in this case, is not from coders to users, but from genetic engineers to protein seekers.”

Natural foods cannot be patented, but Impossible Foods’ products certainly can be. The Impossible Burger is a meat alternative that’s unlike others on the market due to the addition of soy leghemoglobin, or heme. This, the company says, it what makes meat taste like meat, and, in plants, leghemoglobin is the protein that carries heme, an iron-containing molecule.

Originally, Impossible Foods harvested leghemoglobin from the roots of soy plants, but deemed that method unsustainable. Instead, they turned to genetic engineering, which they use to insert the DNA from soy plants into yeast, creating GE yeast with the gene for soy leghemoglobin.4

Impossible Foods’ products are heavily processed and created in production rooms — not grown in or found in nature. Their science project creations are also heavily protected, as evidenced by the 14 patents assigned to Impossible Foods, uncovered by Itzkan:5

Patent No. 10287568 — Methods for extracting and purifying nondenatured proteins

Patent No. 10273492 — Expression constructs and methods of genetically engineering methylotrophic yeast

Patent No. 10172380 — Ground meat replicas

Patent No. 10172381 — Methods and compositions for consumables

Patent No. 10093913 — Methods for extracting and purifying nondenatured proteins

Patent No. 10039306 — Methods and compositions for consumables

Patent No. 10087434 — Methods for extracting and purifying nondenatured proteins

Patent No. 9943096 — Methods and compositions for affecting the flavor and aroma profile of consumables

Patent No. 9938327 — Expression constructs and methods of genetically engineering methylotrophic yeast

Patent No. 9833768 — Affinity reagents for protein purification

Patent No. 9826772 — Methods and compositions for affecting the flavor and aroma profile of consumables

Patent No. 9808029 — Methods and compositions for affecting the flavor and aroma profile of consumables

Patent No. 9737875 — Affinity reagents for protein purification

Patent No. 9700067 — Methods and compositions for affecting the flavor and aroma profile of consumables

Patent No. 9011949 — Methods and compositions for consumables

Impossible Foods Are Junk Foods

While the industrialized meat production that occurs on the concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) responsible for most meat consumed in the U.S. is an environmental and ethical atrocity, creating fake meat in high-tech laboratory settings is not the answer.

Impossible Foods is only perpetuating the consumption of ultraprocessed foods, of which Americans already eat far too much of. Americans not only eat a preponderance of processed food, but 57.9% of it is ultraprocessed6 — products at the far end of the “significantly altered” spectrum that have been robustly linked to obesity,7 ill health and early death.8

Friends of the Earth (FOE), a grassroots environmental group, released a report that posed critical questions about the growing trend toward animal product alternatives. In it they pointed out the highly-processed nature of these products:9

“Various ‘processing aids’ are employed to make some of these products, including organisms (like genetically engineered bacteria, yeast and algae) that produce proteins, and chemicals to extract proteins.

For example, chemicals like hexane are used to extract components of a food, like proteins (from peas, soy, corn etc.) or compounds (from genetically engineered bacteria) to make xanthan gum … disclosure of these ingredients is not required.

Other processing aids (e.g. bacteria, yeast, algae), including those that are genetically engineered to produce proteins, are also not currently required to be disclosed on package labeling. The lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess the inputs and impact of their use.”

Many of these foods, including Impossible Foods’ fake meat, are made with GMO soy, which in itself is ecologically devastating, in part because it’s often planted where essential grasslands and prairies once stood. That soy is heavily sprayed with the cancer-linked herbicide glyphosate, posing additional environmental and potential human health risks.

Not surprisingly, testing by consumer group Moms Across America found the Impossible Burger contains Roundup ingredient glyphosate and its breakdown product AMPA,10 at levels of 11.3 parts per billion — that’s 11 times higher than the glyphosate found in the Beyond Meat Burger,11 the company’s biggest fake meat competitor.

‘There Is No Place for Nature’ at Impossible Foods

Impossible Foods has even taken aim at regenerative farming practices, which are promoting optimal nutrition and health while at the same time helping to prevent pollution and restore damaged ecosystems. Yet, as Itzkan noted:12

“In this software-as-food scenario, there is no place for nature. Manufacturing of Impossible Burger starts with glyphosate-sprayed soy grown on what was once healthy prairie. It is then infused with heme molecules produced by patented yeast in high-tech labs for the blood-like upgrade.

Finally, it ends its journey as a plastic-wrapped puck that some are brave enough to ingest. Just fry with canola oil and the illusion of a meal is complete.”

Impossible Foods also claims that they have a better carbon footprint than live animal farms and hired Quantis, a group of scientists and strategists who help their clients take actions based on scientific evidence, to prove their point.

According to the executive summary published on the Impossible Foods website, their product reduced environmental impact between 87% and 96% in the categories studied, including global warming potential, land occupation and water consumption.13 This, however, compares fake meat to meat from CAFOs, which are notoriously destructive to the environment.

“The pretense that this wealth-concentrating march of the software industry into the food sector is in any way good for people or the environment is predicated on a comparison with only the worst aspects of animal agriculture,” Itzkan said.14

Grass Fed Farms Represent a Truly Regenerative Solution

White Oak Pastures in Bluffton, Georgia, which produces high-quality grass fed products using regenerative grazing practices, commissioned the same analysis by Quantis and published a 33-page study showing comparisons of White Oaks Pastures emissions against conventional beef production.15

While the manufactured fake meat reduced its carbon footprint up to 96% in some categories, White Oaks had a net total emission in the negative numbers as compared to CAFO produced meat. Further, grass fed beef from White Oak Pastures had a carbon footprint that was 111% lower than a typical U.S. CAFO and its regenerative system effectively captured soil carbon, which offset the majority of emissions related to beef production.16

“Within our margin of error,” the report noted, “there is potential that WOP [White Oak Pastures] beef production is climate positive. This would be very rare and it is unusual that there is more benefit to producing something than to simply not produce,”17 but it’s within the realm of possibility when it comes to properly raised grass fed beef. Fake meat produced in a lab simply can’t compare.

“It [the fake meat industry] ignores, entirely, the rapidly growing regenerative movement that is offering so much hope for the planet at this key time, healing landscapes, replenishing aquifers and mitigating fires,” according to Itzkan. “Thus, because of its reliance on grains, tillage, pesticides and fertilizers, fake meat of scale exacerbates depletion of grasslands while undermining a more legitimate solution.”18

Are There Health Risks in Fake Meat?

The drive for plant-based meat alternatives isn’t due to health or even to support vegan or vegetarian diets. Those truly interested in eating a plant-based diet can do so by eating plants, after all, and in so doing can enjoy the many health benefits that eating plant foods provides.

Impossible Foods’ numerous patents reveal that their products are driven by profits, and perhaps the ultimate goal is to replace real meat altogether with a highly lucrative patented product.

It’s already known that the consumption of ultraprocessed food contributes to disease,19 but manufactured fake meat may also pose additional risks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for instance, has raised concerns over the soy leghemoglobin in the Impossible Burger being a possible human allergen.20

Impossible Foods’ scientists also fed leghemoglobin to rats for 28 days to determine the risk of allergic reaction or toxicity. Dana Perls, from Friends of the Earth, pointed out that the rats exhibited alterations in blood chemistry “that could indicate kidney or other health problems,” which the company did not follow up on.21

Consumer Reports senior scientist Michael Hansen added that there are no long-term studies of soy leghemoglobin in humans, even though the process to make it creates at least 45 other proteins as byproducts, which are also consumed and in need of further evaluation.22

The fact is, fake meat cannot replace the complex mix of nutrients found in grass fed beef and other high-quality pastured meats, and it’s likely that consuming ultraprocessed meat alternatives could lead to many of the same health issues that are caused by a processed food diet. To protect your health and the environment, skip pseudofoods that require patents and stick to those found in nature instead.

Left-wing “terror tantrum” spoiled youth could have been stopped with a SPANKING when they were younger; now we’ll have to use FORCE

(Natural News) Who are Antifa and Black Lives Matter rioters, really? When they were children, their parents refused to tell them “No.” Liberal mommy said spanking was wrong, and she coddled her children, obeying their every cry, telling them they were precious snowflakes. When they were young adults, public school teachers refused to tell them…

Three Reasons — A Message For America’s Veterans from James Belcher

From James Belcher
I don’t often speak up, so I hope you will listen when I do. 

There are three (3) reasons for you to take this message to heart.

First, your country is at risk and needs you. 
Second, your countrymen are at risk and they need you. 
Third, your own future is at risk and you need to take action for your own sake. 

I spent a total of six years in military and agency service just prior to and during “the Vietnam Conflict”.  I always wondered why all the simpering and refusal to call it for what it was — The Vietnam War?  

Technically, as most of us now know, what went on in Vietnam wasn’t defined as a war.  It was a “mercenary conflict”, also known as a “police action”.  And technically, we were never soldiers, either.  

We were cheap mercenaries sold by the politicians to serve foreign interests, just like the Hessians. Many of us were conscripted by an illegal draft system against our will. None of us were told our true status as mercenaries at the time, or afterward. We had to figure it out by ourselves. 

For me, the revelation began with Robert McNamara, United States Secretary of Defense, and an obscure BBC broadcast in which he explained the technical difference between a “conflict” and a “war”.  

European audiences were better informed about what we were doing than we were. 

This is just one example of what you haven’t been told.  

Here’s another.  

Did you know that if you served at any time since 1946 and were discharged from military service — honorably or dishonorably — you are still in the service? 

Prior to 1946 when you left military service, it was legally presumed that you returned home to your original political status as an American, and that you were no longer under any obligation to the federal government and no longer adopting any kind of federal citizenship.  

But in 1946, all that changed.  The reason for the change was originally to save money and avoid giving WWII Veterans benefits that they had earned.  

Every man who returned home was supposed to be given a stock portfolio as part of the payment for his service.  So they changed the definitions to make sure that those men, and those of us who followed after them in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and countless other foreign battlegrounds, never came home. 

Technically.  According to the legal definitions.  Again. 

If you have been discharged from any branch of the United States military at any time since 1946, you haven’t really been discharged from service obligations.  

Instead of presuming that you went home to your natural political status as an American after leaving military service, they have presumed that you stayed in federal jurisdiction and that you volunteered to continue an endless tour of duty in an undisclosed reserve status.   

I remember listening to a group of Marines drilling at Sheppard Air Force Base, and hearing all those men shouting, “I am an American!”  

I wonder how they’d feel if they knew that there is a big and ugly difference between being an “American” and being a “US Citizen”?  

I wonder how my buddies from the Nam Era would feel if they knew that they’d been served up as cheap mercenaries?  And never got what they were owed as benefits for it? 

I wonder how any American Veteran would feel if they knew that they were never properly discharged from federal service and federal jurisdiction, and that that “lapse” on the part of the politicians and their flunkies meant that they lost their constitutional guarantees and the freedoms they fought for?  

It also means that we paid “federal income taxes” whether or not we had any income from federal sources.  It means we got stuck paying mortgages owed by foreign governments.  It means we were the goats, the targets, the easy marks. 

And they got away with it, because we stupidly, trustingly, believed that the Federal Subcontractors were our government. And we trusted our government. 

About now, you are feeling the sock in the gut.  Maybe some of you are in denial and angry with me for saying all this.  I was angry, too, and for a long time, I didn’t know where to go or what to do about it.  Now, I do. 

The first step is to send a Registered Letter, Return Receipt Requested, to the head of your former branch of service or services, if you served in more than one, informing him or her that you have been discharged and are returning to your birthright political status— and please amend your records accordingly. 

Now, you are finally “home” and the U.S. Government has no plausible excuse for presuming otherwise. 

Next, declare and record your birthright political status.  Your parents weren’t told that they needed to do this for you, so it didn’t get done.  It’s up to you to make a public declaration that you are a Minnesotan, Texan or Vermonter…. 

Next, get off the hump and join your State Assembly organization.  You are part of a State, not a State-of-State.  

A State-of-State, like the State of Florida, is a business organization hired to do work for the State under a service contract known as the State of [Whichever] Constitution. 

Most likely, you are an Employer, not an Employee — and you are being inappropriately taxed and bossed around by your employees.  It’s time to change all of that. 

And I already told you why: for the sake of your country, your countrymen, and yourself. 

We’ve all been lied to, cheated, bilked, and are now threatened with civil war by these hirelings, these foreign political parties, and the politicians pretending to to “represent” us.  

You may have heard that Mr. Trump recently ordered 600 million vaccine shots.  If you’ve ever served in the United States military, your health has already been severely undermined by experimental vaccines and exposure to nuclear waste and other forms of radiation and pollution.  

Now the Federal Corporations, the foreign subcontractors responsible for these outrages, are proposing to “mandate” untested vaccines for the general population of this country and they think that they can get away with it by pretending that we are all “U.S. Citizens” and not Americans. 

You may assume that this is being done in response to an outbreak of a dangerous strain of the Common Flu Virus —- but no virus known as Sars-Cov-2 or Covid-19, has ever been isolated or identified.  

And no vaccine manufacturer or government is standing good for damages caused by this vaccine, either. 

About now, the Red Alert Alarm Bells should be going off in your heads and you should be thinking —-WTF? 

Bill Gates and Friends, including Dr. Fauci, have developed a patented RNA vaccine.  This inserts a tiny scrap of patented RNA into your cells, and gives the owners of that patent an excuse to say that they own you, because they own that tiny scrap of implanted and privately patented RNA. 

They are aiming at creating 600 million slaves worldwide, owned body and soul by the USA, Inc.  

They assume that you are going to roll up your sleeves, and as long as you allow them to misidentify you as a U.S. Citizen, they think they have the right to force you and your family to do so.   

It is well-past the time that the politicians and the puppet master bankers behind all this got a needle shoved where the sun don’t shine, but the first step is for you to “come home” — write that letter and exonerate yourself from any presumption of continued federal service.  Do it today

Then follow up with your State Assembly and declare and record your political status as an American— not a U.S. Citizen.  And then, get busy and shove. 

You are the Employers.  They are the Employees.  Make it count. 

Go to: and get started. 


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna’s website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The American Revolution: When the Bankers Destroyed the Economy – History Repeating Itself?

(William Guy Carr) In order to understand how men who obtained control of the Bank of England, and the British National Debt, also obtained control of the trade and commerce, and the monetary system of Britain’s American colonies, it will be sufficient if we pick up the threads of the story at the time Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) went over to England to represent the interests of the men who had been associated with him in building up the prosperity of the American Colonies.

The post The American Revolution: When the Bankers Destroyed the Economy – History Repeating Itself? appeared on Stillness in the Storm.