Santa Surfing 8-7-20 VIDEO… “Who is this beautiful Secret Service Agent? John John?”

This is another astounding “connect the dots” video analysis by Santa Surfing.

This short video, with the accompanying article, really opened some doors for my mind. I do feel that JFK, Jr., is still here. And remember that Q said JFK, Jr. is not alive. But if his father had passed away, JFK, Jr., became JFK.

The secret service guy she is pointing to has a Twitter account, Qohn Galt (@QohnG). He’s got 16.6K followers, and, as of the moment I checked it, he had 777 following… pretty synchronistic, wouldn’t you say?



A Veggie That’s a Fruit, With More Vitamin C Than an Orange

Vitamin C has always been vital to immune function, but COVID-19 has shone the spotlight on the vitamin in a big way. While everyone is scurrying to stock up on citrus fruits, there’s actually another fruit that contains more vitamin C than any other: red bell peppers.

Yes, you read that right. Red bell peppers are often categorized, and cooked, as a vegetable, but because they contain seeds, they’re botanically classified as a fruit. Of course, you might not be as concerned with that as much as how they can contribute to your vitamin C intake and what other health benefits red bell peppers have to offer.

Vitamin C in Red Bell Peppers

Although you might immediately think of oranges or orange juice when you hear the term “vitamin C,” bell peppers — specifically sweet red bell peppers — are a far better source.

One cup of sliced raw red bell pepper contains 117 milligrams (mg) of vitamin C,1 which actually exceeds the current RDA for the entire day. For comparison, the same amount of green bell peppers contains around 74 mg.2 According to a comparative study in the September 2012 issue of the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,3 those numbers increase even more if you choose organic bell peppers.

The researchers analyzed the amounts of bioactive compounds in organically grown bell peppers and conventionally grown bell peppers and found that the organically grown peppers contained significantly more vitamin C and higher amounts of carotenoids, like beta carotene, phenolic acids and flavonoids, such as quercetin.

Health Benefits of Red Bell Peppers

Many of the health benefits of red bell peppers can be attributed to the combination of bioactive compounds found within them. A single red bell pepper contains 30 different antioxidants,4 making them one of the most nutrient-dense fruits you can eat.

Antioxidants have been shown to help fight heart disease,5 prevent cancer,6 protect against liver disease and combat oxidative stress and inflammation.7 One of the notable compounds in red bell peppers is quercetin, which is known to have a wide range of health benefits. Quercetin has been shown to help reduce inflammation, alleviate pain,8 lower blood pressure9 and improve learning and memory.10

Of course, some of the health benefits of red bell peppers are also a result of its high vitamin C content. Although vitamin C is often hailed for its powerful immune-boosting properties, it has a protective effect against heart disease and early death, too.

Researchers who published a study in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in June 2015 looked at the diet and health of 97,203 people. They found those who consumed the largest amount of fruits and vegetables had a lower risk of developing heart disease and lower risk of early death when compared with those with the lowest intakes.11

The researchers concluded that this benefit may be driven by the high vitamin C concentration in fruits and vegetables, since those with the highest plasma vitamin C levels seemed to experience the greatest effect.

Vitamin C has also been linked to better eye health. Oxidative stress is connected to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and cataracts, two of the leading causes of blindness in older adults.

In one cohort study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in December 2005, researchers found that a high intake of vitamin C, combined with an above average intake of beta-carotene, vitamin E and zinc, could reduce the risk of developing AMD by 35%.12

Vitamin C is also heavily involved in your nervous system. It supports your neurons, modulates the transmission of nerve impulses and helps your body make catecholamines13 or the hormones dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine that help control your stress levels.

A February 2018 study published in the Journal of Critical Care found preliminary evidence that administering vitamin C in addition to standard therapy may help combat inflammation and stabilize heart rate in those with sepsis and septic shock14 — an emergency situation that accounts for 30% to 50% of all in-hospital deaths15 and believed to be the underlying cause of some serious complications and death in severe COVID-19 infections. Vitamin C may also be useful for16:

Protecting against UV damage

Preventing wrinkles and loss of collagen

Healing burns and wounds

Reducing acne

Alleviating dry skin


How Much Vitamin C Do You Need?

Vitamin C is water-soluble, which means it dissolves in water and is carried throughout the body to your cells for immediate use. Your cells take what they need and anything left over gets excreted from your body through your urine. Unlike fat-soluble vitamins, your body doesn’t store any extra for later. Your body also can’t make vitamin C on its own. That means it’s extra important that you get sufficient amounts from your diet every day.

The current recommendation for vitamin C is 75 mg per day for adult women and 90 mg per day for adult men.18 While daily doses of several hundred mg per day makes sense for many, there’s evidence that higher doses, meaning those over 1,000 mg per day, may be better for combating viruses like the common cold19 and Epstein-Barr20 and as part of the treatment for cancer.21

Other Sources of Vitamin C

One cup of sliced red bell peppers provides more than the current RDA for vitamin C, but if you want to increase your intake even more, there are plenty of other fruits and vegetables that are excellent sources of vitamin C as well.

One of the most vitamin C-rich fruits available is the acerola or Barbados cherry,22 which provides 1,644 mg of vitamin C per cup.23 Compare that to a medium orange, which contains about 69.7 mg of vitamin C.24 Other fruits and vegetables that are particularly rich in the vitamin include25:


Sweet potato





Chili peppers



Brussels sprouts

Tomato/tomato juice




Cooked cabbage

Vitamin C Supplements

Supplementation is an option too, but it’s best to get what you need from a variety of fruits and vegetables. When you eat fruits and vegetables, you’re not only getting natural, easily absorbed vitamin C, you’re also getting dozens of other super nutrients, like antioxidants and phytochemicals, which help fight chronic disease, reduce inflammation and help eliminate carcinogens.

However, if you’re having trouble meeting your needs with diet alone, you can supplement a healthy diet with liposomal vitamin C, which has enhanced bioavailability when compared to other oral forms of the vitamin.

In one small study published in Nutrition and Metabolic Insights in June 2016, researchers compared liposomal vitamin C supplements to other types of oral vitamin C,26 finding liposomal supplements raised the amount of vitamin C in the blood more effectively than the other unencapsulated types.

That’s because the liposomes encapsulate, or surround, the vitamin C, which protects it from the harsh environment of your digestive tract, according to a July 2019 report in the Journal of Liposome Research.27 This helps slows down the release of the vitamin from the supplement and improves absorption.

Hydroxychloroquine Protocol Continues Getting Censored

If you thought the publication of positive hydroxychloroquine studies would stop the blatant and reprehensible censorship of this COVID-19 remedy, you were wrong. It’s only getting worse.

July 27, 2020, America’s Frontline Doctors, a group of physicians who have organized to counteract the false narrative that hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and shouldn’t be used for COVID-19, held a press conference outside the Supreme Court of the United States.

After The New York Times filed a complaint with Facebook,1 the video was quickly scrubbed from YouTube and social media platforms, but you can find an archived copy of the transcript2 here. Donald Trump Jr., President Trump’s son, even had his Twitter account suspended for 12 hours after posting the video.3

During the hours it was available, the video garnered more than 14 million views and in excess of 600,000 shares. Speaking for the group were the founder, Dr. Simone Gold, and Drs. Bob Hamilton, Stella Immanuel, Dan Erickson, Joe Ladapo and James Todaro.

Frontline Doctors Speak Out, Crushing the Fear Narrative

After their first press conference was censored, the group held a second press conference4 the following day, blasting Facebook, Twitter and YouTube for their unwarranted censorship of medical information that can save lives and provide relief from the fear gripping the nation.

The group believes it is crucial we begin to balance the fear of the virus against what we know about its progression, treatment and survivability. The physicians that are part of this group first and foremost want everyone to have hope, and to realize that effective treatment is available and that very few people need to die, even if they are infected and develop symptoms.

“We implore you to hear this because this message has been silenced. There are many thousands of physicians who have been silenced for telling the American people the good news about the situation — that we can manage the virus carefully and intelligently. But we cannot live with this spider web of fear that’s constricting our country,” Gold said in the first press conference.

Immanuel, a primary care physician in Houston, Texas, reviewed her personal successes with the hydroxychloroquine regimen, saying she’s treated more than 350 patients with COVID-19, including patients with comorbidities that place them at increased risk for severe illness, complications and death. None has died.

“The result has been the same. I put them on hydroxychloroquine, I put them on zinc, I put them on Zithromax, and they’re all well,” Immanuel said.

Prophylactic Use of Hydroxychloroquine

They also stress that hydroxychloroquine in combination with zinc — just one 200 milligram tablet of hydroxychloroquine every other week with daily zinc — is an effective prophylactic that could be given to anyone at high risk of infection. Immanuel noted:

“I’ve put myself, my staff, and many doctors that I know, on hydroxychloroquine for prevention, because by the very mechanism of action, it works early and as a prophylaxis. We see 10 to 15 COVID patients every day. We give them breathing treatments. We only wear surgical mask. None of us has gotten sick. It works.”

People that might benefit from prophylactic use would include high-risk individuals such as teachers and the elderly. This could facilitate the safe reopening of schools and businesses everywhere.

Children, they point out, are at extremely low risk from the infection, rarely display symptoms, and are very inefficient transmission vectors. Parents rarely contract the infection from their children.

Hydroxychloroquine Is NOT a Magic Bullet

It is also very important to understand that while hydroxychloroquine is a useful tool, it must be used very early in the course of the illness, ideally immediately after exposure, because it works on slowing down viral replication. If the virus has already multiplied, the horse is out of the barn and hydroxychloroquine will likely be ineffective later in the course of the illness.

It’s also worth noting that in areas where hydroxychloroquine is hard to get a hold of, quercetin is likely a more effective and less expensive alternative, as its primary mechanism of action is identical to that of the drug, in addition to having many other anti-inflammatory benefits.

Both are zinc ionophores, meaning they shuttle zinc into the cell. There’s compelling evidence to suggest the primary benefit of this protocol comes from the zinc, which effectively inhibits viral replication. The problem is that zinc does not readily enter cells, which is why a zinc ionophore is needed.

You can learn more about all of this in “Is Quercetin a Safer Alternative to Hydroxychloroquine?” “Quercetin Boosts Interferon Response to Viruses and COVID-19” and “How to Improve Zinc Uptake with Quercetin to Boost Immune Health.”

Molecular hydrogen is another simple remedy that could have excellent therapeutic potential against SARS-CoV-2 infection, as explained by Tyler LeBaron in “How Molecular Hydrogen Can Help Your Immune System.”

And please, remember nebulized peroxide. I recently treated the 40-year-old nephew of my gardening consultant that came down with serious pre-terminal COVID-19. He was already on hydroxychloroquine, zinc, quercetin and prednisone and was getting worse until he started the nebulized peroxide. He miraculously improved immediately after this treatment.

I will share his story and video in an upcoming article. The cost of the treatment was less than one penny and it has virtually no side effects if used at the very low 0.1% concentration.

Attacks Heat Up After Second Press Conference

Apparently, the technocrats making the rules disagree with the group’s message of hope and call for return to normalcy, because the attack on America’s Frontline Doctors quickly escalated from scrubbing online platforms of their video to actually taking down their website,

In a July 28, 2020, Twitter post, Dr. James Todaro wrote:5

“Wow. It appears Squarespace took down our website today We are reaching a new level of censorship. Do people agree with this?”

America's frontline doctors

According to Todaro,6 Squarespace claims the website violated the company’s Acceptable Use policy “regarding activity that’s false, fraudulent, inaccurate or deceiving.” A new website, americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com7 was created a couple of days later.


But that’s not all. In a July 30, 2020, Twitter post, Gold stated PayPal had temporarily “limited” the group’s ability to receive donations shortly after the new website was announced. However, it seems the problem has been resolved.


That same day, Gold, an emergency room doctor, announced she’d been fired from her job “for appearing in an embarrassing video.” In a Fox News interview with Tucker Carlson, Gold said she’s hired the libel law firm L. Lin Wood to represent her in potential defamation suits, as media efforts are currently underway to smear her professional reputation.

Yale Professor Agrees: Cure for COVID-19 Already Exists

Dr. Harvey A. Risch, a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, is also trying to get the message out about hydroxychloroquine. In a July 23, 2020, Newsweek op-ed, he wrote:8

“I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals.

I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines.

As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily … I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine.

When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.”

Risch goes on to cite evidence presented in his May 27, 2020, article9 in the American Journal of Epidemiology, which bears the instructive title: “Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis.”

In it, he reviews five hydroxychloroquine studies that demonstrate “clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients.” Since the publication of that paper, another seven studies have been published that support hydroxychloroquine’s use against COVID-19. This includes a study led by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, which involved 400 high-risk COVID-19 patients, all of whom successfully recovered, as well as:10

“… four studies totaling almost 500 high-risk patients treated in nursing homes and clinics across the U.S., with no deaths; a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil, with significantly reduced risk of hospitalization and two deaths among 334 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine; and another study of 398 matched patients in France, also with significantly reduced hospitalization risk,” Risch writes.

Hydroxychloroquine Has a Proven Safety Profile

Risch’s American Journal of Epidemiology paper also reviews large-scale studies demonstrating the safety of the medication.

In his Newsweek article,11 he points out that the adverse event reports cited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration when it warned hydroxychloroquine might cause cardiac arrhythmia, especially when administered with azithromycin, were generated from tens of millions of patient uses of hydroxychloroquine for long periods of time, often for the chronic treatment of lupus or rheumatoid arthritis.

“Even if the true rates of arrhythmia are tenfold higher than those reported, the harms would be minuscule compared to the mortality occurring right now in inadequately treated high-risk COVID-19 patients,” Risch writes.12

“This fact is proven by an Oxford University study of more than 320,000 older patients taking both hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, who had arrhythmia excess death rates of less than 9/100,000 users … A new paper in the American Journal of Medicine by established cardiologists around the world fully agrees with this.”

Negative Studies Used Toxic Doses

Risch also highlights the fact that all of the studies used to claim hydroxychloroquine is dangerous were actually using toxic doses.

While doctors reporting success with the drug are using standard doses around 200 mg per day for either a few days or maybe a couple of weeks, studies such as the Bill & Melinda Gates-funded13 Recovery Trial used 2,400 mg of hydroxychloroquine during the first 24 hours — three to six times higher than the daily dosage recommended14 — followed by 400 mg every 12 hours for nine more days for a cumulative dose of 9,200 mg over 10 days.

Similarly, the Solidarity Trial,15 led by the World Health Organization, used 2,000 mg on the first day, and a cumulative dose of 8,800 mg over 10 days. These doses are simply too high. More is not necessarily better. Too much, and guess what? You might kill the patient. It’s really unclear as to why these studies used such enormous doses, seeing how the dosages this drug is normally prescribed in, for a range of conditions, never go that high.

Appropriate Dosage Renders Positive Results

Meanwhile, a July 1, 2020, retrospective analysis16,17,18 of 2,541 patients in Michigan found use of hydroxychloroquine alone cut mortality by more than half, from 26.4% to 13.5%. Patients received 400?mg of hydroxychloroquine twice on day 1, followed by 200?mg twice a day for the next four days.

No adverse heart-related events were observed. Hydroxychloroquine?in combination with azithromycin had a mortality rate of 20.1%, and azithromycin alone had a mortality rate of 22.4%. The azithromycin was dosed as 500?mg on day 1, followed by 250?mg once a day for the next four days.

According to the authors,19 “The combination of hydroxychloroquine?plus?azithromycin was reserved for selected patients with severe COVID-19 and with minimal cardiac risk factors.” Unfortunately, zinc was not included in this trial. A majority of doctors using a hydroxycholoroquine regimen do use zinc, plus an antibiotic to stifle secondary bacterial infections.

“Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic,” Risch writes.20 “They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk.

I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications, but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit …

As all know, the medication has become highly politicized. For many, it is viewed as a marker of political identity, on both sides of the political spectrum. Nobody needs me to remind them that this is not how medicine should proceed.

We must judge this medication strictly on the science. When doctors graduate from medical school, they formally promise to make the health and life of the patient their first consideration, without biases of race, religion, nationality, social standing — or political affiliation. Lives must come first …

Reality demands a clear, scientific eye on the evidence and where it points. For the sake of high-risk patients, for the sake of our parents and grandparents, for the sake of the unemployed, for our economy and for our polity, especially those disproportionally affected, we must start treating immediately.”

Many Countries Have Successfully Quelled COVID-19

If you want to review more studies on hydroxychloroquine, check out,21 which at the time of this writing included the following graphic showing the adjusted death toll in countries that adopted the use of hydroxychloroquine early on, compared to those that did or have not.

hydroxychloroquine use

As indicated above, a number of countries have successfully relied on hydroxychloroquine to quell the COVID-19 pandemic, including Dharavi, India, one of the densest slums in the world. As reported by Life Site News:22

“Reports credit the huge turnaround to various factors. Most focused on Dharavi’s use of widespread testing and contact tracing … But they ignored the policy most responsible. Indian doctors used hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for prophylaxis (preventive) treatment — the same drug the American media have politicized.

Dharavi’s COVID-19 infection rate dropped drastically from April through June. In July, new infections were very low, almost reaching zero on July 9. Officials have credited23 this turnaround to ‘[a] combination of hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc tablets along with homeopathic medicines.’”

In one international poll24,25 of 6,227 doctors in 30 countries, 37% rated the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine as “the most effective therapy” for COVID-19. The poll was done by Sermo, the world’s largest healthcare data collection company and social platform for physicians.

In Spain, where the drug was used by 72% of doctors, it was rated “the most effective therapy” by 75% of them. The typical dose used by a majority of doctors was 400 mg per day.

In the May, 2020, issue of Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, French microbiologist and infectious disease expert Didier Raoult, founder and director of the research hospital Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection,26 reported27,28 that a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, administered immediately upon diagnosis, led to recovery and “virological cure” in 91.7% of patients.

According to Raoult, the drug combination “avoids worsening and clears virus persistence and contagiosity in most cases.” No cardiac toxicity was observed using a dose of 200 mg three times a day for 10 days, along with 500 mg of azithromycin on day 1 followed by 250 mg daily for the next four days.

Chloroquine Inhibits SARS — Known Since 2005

Remarkably, evidence that hydroxychloroquine could be useful against SARS-CoV-2 goes as far back as 2005, when the article29 “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread” was published in the Virology Journal.

Did Dr. Anthony Fauci, appointed to lead the White House Pandemic Response Team, know about this? One could argue he should have. And, if he did, why didn’t he say something? According to this study:30

“… chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

In other words, chloroquine functions as both a prophylactic (prevention) and a treatment against SARS coronavirus. This is precisely what many doctors have found with hydroxychloroquine as well, a drug that is very similar to chloroquine but has a safer profile, when used against SARS-CoV-2.

Other early evidence has been highlighted by Raoult. In its April 13, 2020, issue, the German magazine Blauer Bote31,32 lists a collection of 75 expert opinions about the COVID-19 threat. Among them is Raoult, who said (translated from German):

“I did a scientific study on chloroquine and viruses that was published thirteen years ago. Since then, four other studies by other authors have shown that the coronavirus responds to chloroquine. None of this is new.

It takes my breath away that the group of decision-makers doesn’t even know about the latest science. We knew about the possible effect of chloroquine on cultured virus samples. It was known to be an effective antiviral.”

A Coordinated Effort to Inhibit Use of an Effective Drug?

The wildly divergent views on hydroxychloroquine appear to have little to do with its safety and effectiveness against COVID-19, and more to do with a concerted and coordinated effort to prevent its use.

There are several reasons for why certain individuals and companies might want to discourage the use of an inexpensive generic drug to work against this pandemic illness.

One of the most obvious reasons is because it might eliminate the need for a vaccine or other antiviral medication currently under development.33 Hundreds of millions of dollars have already been invested, and vaccine makers are hoping for a payday in the billions if not trillions of dollars. In a June 27, 2020, blog post, Dr. Meryl Nass points out:34

“It is remarkable that a series of events taking place over the past three months produced a unified message about hydroxychloroquine … Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for 65 years in many millions of patients.

And so the message was crafted that the drug is safe for its other uses, but dangerous when used for COVID-19. It doesn’t make sense, but it seems to have worked. Were these acts carefully orchestrated? You decide.

Might these events have been planned to keep the pandemic going? To sell expensive drugs and vaccines to a captive population? Could these acts result in prolonged economic and social hardship, eventually transferring wealth from the middle class to the very rich?”

The fight over hydroxychloroquine may also have political underpinnings, as noted not only by Risch but also by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson. In a May 18, 2020, Full Measure report (above), she states that “never before has a discussion about choices of medicine been so laced with political overtones.”

As cautioned by Risch, medicine must not become politicized, especially not during a pandemic. We cannot afford such folly. By politicizing it, the media has taken on a role that can readily be likened to agents of genocide. Naturally, those of us in the holistic field have been aware of how censorship lead people astray, health wise, for a very long time. Conventional doctors are just now getting a taste of what it’s like, and clearly, many are absolutely floored by it.

It’s certainly understandable, because to censor potentially lifesaving medical treatment during a global pandemic really brings it to a whole new level. To so thoroughly demonize a medication that has been used for decades, and could have saved thousands, if not tens of thousands, is as inexcusable as it is inappropriate. Time will tell whether we’ll ever see a time where science is allowed to take its rightful place in medicine again.

"Elected" or "Voted In"?


By Anna Von Reitz

There is a great deal of confusion about the various election processes that are ongoing — who is being elected to what office and with what authority and by whom — these are the questions that have to be asked and answered.
First, there is the Great Divide between Public Elections and Private Elections, or as I describe them, Unincorporated Elections and Corporation Elections.
The more proper way of describing what happens in a corporation’s shareholder “elections” is that the candidates filling corporate offices are “voted in” —- not actually elected at all.
This is another one of those semantic deceits and confusions that result from the use of legalese in common parlance.
When you elect someone to Public Office they have serious responsibilities and owe their service to the Public Good. That’s why we say that they are doing their Public Duty when they accept such an office and make oaths (sea jurisdiction) or affirmations (land jurisdiction) consciously accepting those responsibilities.
But when you, acting as a shareholder, vote someone into a private office in a corporation, you are not actually electing them — you are “voting them into office” and they don’t owe any particular debt to the Public Good. All they are responsible for is making profit and performing contractual obligations in exchange for a paycheck.
As you can now see, these are profoundly different kinds of “elections” and they result in people holding profoundly different kinds of “offices”. Moreover, those who are taking part in these various electoral processes are acting in different capacities.
The people who elect members of their own body politic to Public Office are acting in a different capacity than those who are acting as persons and voting in private corporation elections as shareholders.
Sadly, public elections for Public Office have become very rare in this country— so rare in fact that the appearance of an actual Public Officer is a shock and requires explanation.
This is because we have been mistaken and misled into thinking that the private corporation elections — both Municipal and Territorial — that spasmodically impact our country are public elections when they are not, and haven’t been for many decades.
I have observed to you all that our government “of, for, and by” the people of this country is not always in Session.
I have also observed to you that we have been misidentified as foreigners in our own country by falsely registering us as British Territorial United States Citizens soon after we are born, so that we are unable to act as people and conduct actual public elections or hold actual public offices as adults until we rebut these “Legal Presumptions”.
Thankfully, we have overturned these Legal Presumptions and are well on our way to repopulating this entire country and are holding actual Public Elections to fill actual Public Offices again.
Our process for doing this has nothing to do with political parties.
Everything that you see going on in the world of “Republicans” and “Democrats” is foreign to us and always has been.
These are “elections” of corporate officers working for the foreign Federal Subcontractors and their “federated” State of State franchises and Municipal franchise operations.
These corporate elections are carried out by the shareholders and employees of these corporations and they result in electing new CEO’s — Presidents, Governors, and Mayors — of private corporations that are acting in a “custodial capacity” with respect to our assets.
Read that — they aren’t our Presidents, Governors, or Mayors.
They are occupying private corporate offices that have been given similar names for purposes of fraud and deceit.
They are our Subcontractors, but they are not occupying our Public Offices. They can’t occupy our offices, because our offices require us to act as people not “persons”, while their offices require the exact opposite. They have to act as “persons”, not people.
So they can’t occupy our Public Offices because they are acting as Legal Persons and as Shareholders of these private, foreign, for-profit governmental services corporations dba “the” United States, Incorporated, and “the” United States of America, Incorporated —- but they can sure gum things up and confuse everyone involved.
Recently, a question surfaced as to authorities possessed by County Sheriffs versus authority possessed by Governors of States of States and Mayors of Municipalities, since they are all elected officials?
Who elected them? People? Or Persons? Or PERSONS?
That tells you the source of their authority and the nature of their office.
If Americans acting as the People of this country elected them, they have authority and they have Public Office and they have responsibility to match that authority. A County Assembly Sheriff duly elected by Americans acting in their birthright capacity is the highest Peacekeeping Official in the country — within the boundaries of their county.
A “Sheriff” or “Governor” or “Mayor” elected by our employees as an elected official within their corporation’s structure has the same kind of limited authority that a Floor Walker, Board Member, or Store Manager has when employed by Walmart, Inc., or Ben and Jerry’s, Inc.
Their edicts, mandates, codes, regulations, and statutes may serve “as law” for their actual employees and dependents, but they have no actual authority related to the Public-at-Large.
This is why a simple Sheriff properly elected to his Public Office, for example, as Macon County Sheriff by Georgians who have affirmed their birthright political status has far more power and authority than the Governor of the State of Georgia who is elected by shareholders of the State of Georgia, Inc.
This is also why Americans who have taken up the mantle of self-governance and who act, for example, as Georgians, don’t vote in the foreign political party elections.
That would be like the Lord of the Manor getting involved in a squabble among his domestic staff over who gets to act as Chief Cook.
If it is an election process to determine who acts as Chief Cook (or President) it’s being allowed by the Lord of the Manor– who at any moment retains the right to hire, fire, and organize the personnel on his payroll as he sees fit, regardless of their druthers. So why would he sign up and vote in their in-house domestic “elections”?
He wouldn’t. And neither do we.
State Nationals who maintain Dual Federal Citizenship for any reason can certainly participate in the private shareholder elections of the federal service corporations and should do so — and should vote wisely and in favor of what is best for America.
The rest of us are engaged in the actual Public Election process which results in people holding actual Public Office, and doing their actual Public Duty.
Please notice that just as a “Sheriff” may not be holding Public Office and may not have the authority of Public Office, not all “Assemblies” are equal.
Driving home last night I saw a campaign sign for someone running for an Assembly Seat in “District 4”.
Whenever you see references to “Voting Districts” or “Districts” in general, you are dealing with what? The District (of Columbia) Government —- the British Territorial Government.
This is a “district assembly” of the U.S. Citizens living in your State —- but it is not the State Assembly that you are owed and are heir to as an American.
You and your government and your Assembly have been unlawfully converted and/or depopulated with malice aforethought by your usurping British and Papist Subcontractors.
It’s up to you to see through the deceits and word games and come home to populate your own country and your own natural jurisdiction on the land and soil.
It’s also your responsibility to do your Public Duty and to educate your “house staff” regarding the authorities, roles, and Public Laws involved. Most especially, it is your responsibility to teach your public employees where their authority begins and ends, as spelled out in the Constitutions.
Nobody else can do it for you.

See this article and over 2600 others on Anna’s website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Exit From The Matrix: Free Individual vs. Deep State

by Jon Rappoport

The people who run society are engaged in bringing systems and structures into interlocking alignment, in order to create larger and larger machines of control.

I keep returning to this territory, because the whole thrust of modern civilization is making the individual extinct.

Powerless, badly educated, adrift in technology, viewed as a unit tied to a massive collective—this is the picture of the individual.

Let’s go back to square one. The individual is fundamentally at odds with the State. The State wants control. The State wants loyalists, adherents, joiners, conformists. The individual wants freedom, if he has any inkling of his own power.

The basic makeup of the State is promoted as a We. We want this. We need this. We deserve this. We all agree on this. The ubiquitous We is floated on purpose. The aim is to eradicate the I. The individual.

The State wants all arguments to center on what We should get. Should We be given this or that? Should We have A or B? What is best for We?

This is where all the trouble starts.

The State is not going to solve that trouble because it is creating it.

On the other hand, the individual who is free knows what he wants. Or can discover it. Sooner or later, he realizes that most of the people around him aren’t free. Those people have embedded themselves so deeply in We that they can’t see outside it. The very idea of being free is meaningless to them.

So be it.

Ultimately, when all the bets are in, when all the chips are laid down on the table, the State’s game is all about We. That’s how the game is rigged.

The individual is ruled out.

The roulette wheel spins, but it doesn’t matter which slot the ball falls into. No slot is labeled “individual.”

And I’m not just talking about the State. Any large organization works in the same way.

So the free individual has to take his future in his own hands.

First, he has to conceive that he does have a future apart from We.

Then he has to imagine what that future could look like. He has to invent the future he wants.

What’s called “the spiritual” is not independent from what I’m talking about here. How the free individual imagines his future and then goes after inventing it is very much a spiritual exploration. Why? Because the individual is more than a bio-machine. Knowing that, he conceives of a future which is more than lowest-common-denominator physical needs.

In my collection, Exit From The Matrix, I include dozens of imagination exercises and techniques I developed, based on a study of ancient Tibet, and my work with hypnotherapist Jack True. The whole purpose of those exercises is: the individual returns to himself and his power.

Not the We. The I.

The entire planet is turning into a cult, which I call: “What Already Exists.” As opposed to the individual inventing what he most profoundly wants to exist.

What Already Exists is mostly structures and systems. To the degree a person feels his life should be lived inside a structure, he is going to refrain from imagining the future he truly wants.

In fact, the whole notion of “truly wants” is going to shrink and vanish from his mind.

But that notion is the key.

The key to his freedom and creative power.

exit from the matrix

Here are the contents of my collection, Exit From The Matrix:

First, my audio presentations:















Then you will receive the following audio seminars I have previously done:

* Mind Control, Mind Freedom

* The Transformations

* Desire, Manifestation and Fulfillment

* Altered States, Consciousness, and Magic

* Beyond Structures

* The Mystery and Magic of Dialogue

* The Voyage of Merlin

* Modern Alchemy and Imagination

* Imagination and Spiritual Enlightenment

* Dissolving Stress

* The Paranormal Project

* Zen Painting for Everyone Now

* Past Lives, Archetypes, and Hidden Sources of Human Energy

* Expression of Self

* Imagination Exercises for a Lifetime

* Old Planet, New Planet, New Mind

* The Era of Magic Returns

* Your Power Revealed

* Universes Without End

* Relationships

* Building a Business for Success

I have included an additional bonus section:

* My book, The Secret Behind Secret Societies (pdf document)

* My book, The Ownership of All Life (pdf document)

* A long excerpt from my briefly published book, Full Power (pdf document)

* My 24 articles in the series, “Coaching the Coaches” (pdf document)

And these audio seminars:

* The Role of Medical Drugs in Human Illness

* Longevity One: The Mind-Body Connection

* Longevity Two: The Nutritional Factors

(All the audio presentations are mp3 files and the documents and books are pdf files. You download the files upon purchase. There is no physical ship.)

What has been called The Matrix is a series of layers. These layers compose what we call Reality. Reality is not merely the consensus people accept in their daily lives. It is also a personal and individual conception of limits. It is a perception that these limits are somehow built into existence. But this is not true.

What I’ve done here is remove the lid on those perceived limits. This isn’t an intellectual undertaking. It’s a way to open up space and step on to a new road, with new power.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.