It is time to take action again! It is time to take the destiny of our world in our own hands! We all agree that the process of planetary liberation is taking too long. Here is our chance to collectively speed up the process. Therefore we are using the opportunity of the powerful Jupiter Saturn great conjunction on December 21st to create a portal through which we will unify our consciousness and trigger the process that will lead us into the Age of Aquarius.
Make this viral! Share it worldwide! Please post it on your websites and blogs. Invite spiritual groups to join us. If you know an alternative media outlet, you can send it to them. You can create a Facebook event for your local group of people doing this in your part of the world. We also need one main Facebook group for this event. You can create a video about this and post it on Youtube.
Scientific studies have confirmed positive effects of mass meditations and activations on human society, so each of you that will participate in this activation can actually help bringing the Age of Aquarius closer to us:
This activation helps the Light forces to ground the energy of Light on the surface of the planet to further stabilize the timeline that will lead into the long awaited Age of Aquarius. Number of people doing that activation is the single most influential factor within the power of the surface human population for speeding up the process.
We can reach the critical mass of 144,000 people doing this activation! We can even reach one million! This will create a massive healing chain reaction in the energy field worldwide.
Jupiter Saturn conjunction on December 21st completes the 2020 Age of Aquarius timeline stargate which has opened on January 12th with Saturn Pluto conjunction, had its turning point on June 30th with Jupiter Pluto conjunction and will close on December 21th with Jupiter Saturn conjunction:
The purpose of the whole 2020 Age of Aquarius timeline stargate is to stabilize the Age of Aquarius positive timeline for the planet. During 2020, the dark forces have tried their hardest to prevent the positive Ascension timeline from manifesting. Now it is our collective chance for the positive Ascension timeline to be anchored, secured and stabilized forever, and to ensure that the rest of the planetary liberation process occurs smoothly and rapidly.
There will be many powerful astrological configurations in December, leading to our main activation on December 21st. Each of those configurations will be a stepping stone to our main activation. First, there will be Pluto Eris square on December 10th, becoming exact at 22:06 UTC. Then, there will be a total Solar eclipse on December 14th at 16:14 UTC. After that, Saturn will enter Aquarius on December 17th at 05:04 UTC, and Jupiter will enter Aquarius a few days later on December 19th at 13:08 UTC.
Pluto Eris square is the energy of the warrior goddess fighting against establishment. Total Solar eclipse on December 14th will display a mutable cross of Sun, Moon and Mercury conjunct, squaring Neptune, squaring Lunar node, squaring Vesta. This energy will bring rapid disillusionment in many areas for the surface population. Saturn and Jupiter entering Aquarius will start bringing much needed Aquarian energy to the surface of the planet, with at least one of major planets or asteroids staying in Aquarius from then on, until the year 2043.
The great Jupiter Saturn conjunction on December 21st is the first great conjunction in Aquarius since 1405, and it is happening exactly on the day of the winter solstice. This is the moment when the first long awaited energies of the Age of Aquarius will finally begin flowing in:
It is the closest great conjunction since 1623, Jupiter and Saturn will be so close together that you will almost see them as a single star. In the eyepiece of a telescope you will be able to see both planets very close together, their many moons almost apparently touching:
Jupiter and Saturn at 0 degrees 29 minutes Aquarius will make an exact grand trine with Alcyone (our local central sun in the Pleiades) at 0 degrees 17 minutes Gemini, and M87 galaxy (a major galaxy in the Virgo cluster, as source of galactic love for this sector of the universe) at 1 degrees 13 minutes Libra. This grand trine will bring extremely powerful energies of cosmic love to the planet and this will be the trigger that will begin the Age of Aquarius new cycle. The flash of cosmic love energies will originate from the M87 galaxy in Virgo supercluster and it will be much more powerful than the flash which reached the Earth from M87 during the AION portal activation:
We will be doing our Age of Aquarius meditation at the exact moment of Jupiter Saturn conjunction on December 21st , which will be at 6:22 pm UTC. This equals 10:22 am PST in Los Angeles, 11:22 am MST in Denver, 12:22 pm pm CST in Chicago, 1:22 pm EST in New York, 6:22 pm GMT in London, 7:22 pm CET in Paris, 8:22 pm EET in Cairo, 2:22 am CST on Tuesday, December 22nd in Taipei and Beijing, 3:22 am JST on December 22nd in Tokyo and 5:22 am AEDT on December 22nd in Sydney.
You can check the time of the meditation for your time zone here:
1. Use your own technique to bring you to a relaxed state of consciousness.
2. State your intent to use this meditation as a tool to co-create the trigger that will start the Age of Aquarius
3. Invoke the Violet Flame from its primary source to place a circle of protection around you during and after the meditation. Ask it to transmute anything that does not serve the Light
4. Visualize a pillar of brilliant white Light emanating from the Cosmic Central Sun, then being distributed to Central Suns of all galaxies in this universe. Then visualize this light flowing through the M87 galaxy and then entering through the Galactic Central Sun, then going through our Galaxy, then entering our Solar System and going through all beings of Light inside our Solar System, then through the sublunar space and then through all beings on planet Earth and also through your body to the center of the Earth.
5. Visualize this Light transmuting all remaining darkness on Earth, healing all inequalities, erasing all poverty and bringing abundance to all humanity. Visualize soft pink Light of the Goddess embracing all beings on planet Earth and healing their emotional bodies. Visualize a new grand cosmic cycle of the Age of Aquarius beginning, bringing pure Light, Love and Happiness to all beings on Earth. Visualize your perfect life in the new Age of Aquarius.
In Denver, Colorado, a 34-year-old man stepped out of a warm shower and was met with a rush of cold air from his bathroom — a familiar experience for many people during the fall and winter months. In this case, however, what is for most the sensation of a brief chill turned into a serious and potentially life-threatening allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis.1
In addition to becoming covered in hives, the man struggled to breathe and was transported via ambulance to the department of emergency medicine at the Denver Health Medical Center. There, he arrived with low blood pressure and shortness of breath caused by exposure to cold air after getting out of the shower.2
The condition, known as cold urticaria, is something emergency physicians should be aware of, doctors wrote in a case study published in The Journal of Emergency Medicine, as it can alter necessary patient care and may even be induced by cold IV infusions, leading to sudden declines in critically ill patients.3
Yes, Cold Air Allergies Exist
While urticaria, or hives that appear suddenly, is thought to affect about 20% of people during their lifetimes,4 cold urticaria, or an allergy to cold temperatures, is relatively rare, with a reported prevalence of 0.05%.5 Writing in UpToDate, Dr. Marcus Maurer, professor of dermatology and allergy at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany, explained:6
“Cold urticaria is characterized by pruritic wheals (hives) and/or angioedema due to cutaneous mast cell degranulation and release of proinflammatory mediators after cold exposure of the skin.
Triggers include skin contact with cold objects, cold liquids, and cold air. The underlying pathophysiology is largely unknown but is likely to involve immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated mast cell activation.”
With reported cases dating back to 1866, symptoms typically occur minutes after exposure of the skin to cold air, liquid or objects and are usually local, but anaphylaxis can also occur, especially if a large area of the body is exposed to cold temperatures, such as occurs during swimming in cold water.
It’s been suggested that most cases are self-limiting, resolving in four to five years. However, other research found only 25% of those affected have their symptoms resolve within 10 years.7
Another study, which followed patients with cold urticarial from 1995 to 2015, revealed that while 22% reported their condition had resolved and 23% said it had improved, 55% said the disease remained stable or worsened over the study period.8 In other words, there are more questions than answers when it comes to cold urticaria, including its underlying cause.
In most cases, cold urticarial occurs without a family history of the condition, which suggests it’s not typically an inherited condition. Often, the event occurs without any obvious trigger, although infectious disease, insect bites, certain medications and blood cancers have been noted as possible factors.9
Young adults are most commonly affected, but at least one case study exists of a 9-year-old boy who developed cold urticarial after swimming in the ocean.10 One study also found that women may be affected twice as often as men.11
Signs and Symptoms of Cold Urticaria
Symptoms linked to cold urticaria vary from person to person. Some people may have mild reactions with few symptoms while others experience multiple symptoms and life-threatening anaphylaxis. Signs and symptoms include:12
Red, itchy rash after exposure to cold
Swelling in the area exposed to cold
Severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis)
Diagnosis is typically based on these characteristic signs and symptoms, but a cold stimulation test may also be done in which an ice cube or other cold object is placed against the skin for one to five minutes. If a red, swollen rash develops within a few minutes of exposure, cold urticaria is diagnosed.13
Blood tests may also be given to look for related diseases. In one study of 50 patients at an allergy practice in Vancouver, Canada, diagnosed with cold-induced urticarial, 32% had co-occurring physical urticarias while 52% had secondary allergy diagnoses.14
Because the condition can have a negative impact on quality of life, the primary goal of treatment is to alleviate symptoms. However, in terms of prevention, avoiding exposure to cold is the most effective option.15 In one assessment of 99 patients over a 20-year period, most relied on lifestyle modifications such as cold avoidance to control symptoms in lieu of medication.16
When this isn’t possible, antihistamines are sometimes recommended prior to cold exposures and those affected may also carry an epinephrine autoinjector (EpiPen) to use in the event of anaphylaxis.17 In the featured case study, for instance, physicians noted:18
“He required two doses of intramuscular epinephrine and was ultimately started on an epinephrine infusion. He was admitted to the intensive care unit for anaphylaxis monitoring and was found to have a positive ice cube test, reinforcing the suspected diagnosis.”
Largest Study to Date Sheds Light on Urticaria in Children
A study of children 18 years or younger diagnosed with acquired cold-induced urticaria (ACU) at Boston Children’s Hospital shed some light on the condition in this age group.19 From 1996 to 2017, 415 patients, aged 4 months to 18.3 years, were diagnosed with ACU. The majority (78.3%) had a history of atopic disease while 25.8% had other urticaria.
Most of the cases (about two-thirds) led to only localized (Grade 1) symptoms, while 14% had symptoms that spread throughout the body (Grade 2) and 18.6% experienced anaphylaxis (Grade 3). In the most severe cases, which involved anaphylaxis, swimming was the noted trigger in 77.6% of cases while the rest were caused by ingestion of cold food or beverages or exposure to cold air or water.
The cold stimulation test (CST, such as the ice cube test described above), was used for diagnosis in 61.7% of patients, and was positive in 69.9%. The study authors explained:20
“In the largest study to date on ACU, grade 3 reactions occurred in about a fifth of patients. Positive CST result was associated with a higher risk for anaphylaxis from ACU. Epinephrine prescription and patient/family counseling about risk factors for grade 3 reactions are recommended.”
Living With Cold Urticaria
If you’ve been diagnosed with cold urticarial, you may need to avoid exposing large areas of your skin to cold water. Before you go swimming, for example, dip your hand in the water to see if a reaction occurs before jumping in, and do not swim alone in cold water.
You should also avoid ice-cold food and beverages and avoid exposing your skin to sudden changes in temperature as much as possible. Damp and windy conditions may make flare-ups more likely, while whole-body exposures to cold may lead to more severe reactions. If you’ve been prescribed an epinephrine autoinjector, keep it with you in case of serious reactions.21
During cold weather, you should also wear warm clothing and protect your skin from exposure to the elements as much as possible. A scarf wrapped around your nose and mouth, for instance, may be helpful.
As for alternative treatments, one study suggested that it may be possible to achieve desensitization by exposing small areas of the skin to cold, such as by washing your face with cold water every morning and evening. However, “For larger areas it can be a time-consuming procedure and requires close clinical supervision,” researchers wrote in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings.22
Other Triggers for Urticaria
Urticaria, commonly known as hives, appear as raised red or skin-colored bumps on the skin. They may be itchy and will turn white in the center when pressed. Fortunately, cold-induced hives are not common, but they can be caused by many other physical triggers, including exposure to heat, pressure or sunlight. Exercise can also cause urticaria, as can:23
Viral infections, including colds, mononucleosis and hepatitis
As is the case with cold urticaria, the best solution to hives is to avoid the trigger that causes them. In cases where the trigger isn’t obvious, and the hives are chronic, occurring for more than six weeks, speaking with an allergist may help.
Benefits and Risks of Cold Temperatures
Assuming you’re not allergic to the cold, exposure to cold temperatures can be beneficial to your health. Cold temperatures may help you burn body fat, and mitochondrial biogenesis is directly involved in this process.24 During exposure to cold, your body increases production of norepinephrine in the brain, which is involved in focus and attention.
Colder temperatures help you think more clearly25 and researchers have found that people perform tasks better when the room temperature is set at a cooler setting then a warmer one.26 Some of the simplest options to harness the power of the cold for your health include:
Applying an ice pack or cold gel pack
Applying an iced towel (simply wet a towel and freeze it) or massaging with ice cubes
Taking a cold shower or alternating between cold and hot in your shower
Jumping into an unheated pool following sauna or exercise
Swimming in the ocean when water temperatures are low
Turning down the thermostat in your house in the winter to about 60 degrees F
There are some caveats, however. Your risk of heart attack rises with exposure to the cold as your blood pressure and risk of dehydration increase.27 This is especially true on days when pollution is high and temperatures are lower.28 Further, if you have signs of cold urticaria, you’ll want to avoid any unnecessary exposures to cold air, water, food or beverages.
Nine months into the COVID-19 pandemic, the bitter conflict about mask wearing continues. In my view, the reason for this is because the science behind the mask mandates is never addressed by the politicians and public health professionals making the recommendations, and the media have completely given up on their journalistic duty.
What you end up with is Dr. Anthony Fauci saying things like “the data on mask wearing speaks for itself,”1 without telling you that virtually all studies published to date show that universal mask wearing does not prevent the spread of viral illness. The remedy would be journalistic investigation, but the mainstream media clearly doesn’t fulfill that role anymore.
It’s one thing to rely on opinion and unsubstantiated belief when making decisions for your own self. It’s another when opinion is used to justify public health mandates. When we’re talking about the health of billions of people, science really should guide the decisions made, and that means actually taking a cold hard look at the scientific literature.
A Journalist Investigates
In the featured video, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder of Children’s Health Defense, interviews investigative journalist Jeremy Hammond, who has written extensively about foreign policy, finance, vaccines and, more recently, pandemic response measures.
In the interview, they review a range of questions, including: Where did SARS-CoV-2 come from? Is it possible that it was the result of gain-of-function research? What is the end goal of global measures such as lockdowns and universal mask wearing? Is it really all about protecting public health, or is there some other agenda at play?
With regard to mask wearing, what does the science say about their effectiveness against viral illnesses? Are there any drawbacks, such as ill health effects? Should children wear masks even though their risk of severe COVID-19 illness and death is virtually nonexistent and they’re not a significant vector for spread?
What are the larger societal consequences of mask wearing? What impact do the media have on how the public perceives mask orders, and just how do the media manufacture consent for these draconian freedom-robbing measures?
As noted by Kennedy, one commonly used tactic is to claim scientific consensus; that somehow, the science is unequivocal and cannot be disputed. It’s important to understand that this is nonsense. Science is never “settled,” and it’s exceptionally rare to end up with a scientific consensus on anything, because there are almost always two or more sides to any given inquiry.
Arguing for scientific consensus is particularly egregious and ludicrous when the bulk of the evidence actually demonstrates the complete opposite of what they say it does!
It’s really nothing short of “gaslighting”2 — a term used to describe a particularly insidious form of psychological manipulation in which victims are systematically fed false information that makes them question what they know to be true. Over time, the victim becomes increasingly unable to discern truth from falsehood as they start doubting their own perceptions.
What Does the Science Say?
With regard to universal mask wearing, the bottom line, Hammond says, is that the science does not support these recommendations. Under certain conditions, in certain settings, they can be modestly helpful, but by and large, there’s no support for the idea that people wearing masks everywhere they go will reduce infection rates and save lives.
Hammond points out that even the World Health Organization, in its June 5, 2020, guidance3 on face mask use, noted that there’s no direct evidence that universal masking of healthy people is an effective intervention against respiratory illnesses. According to the WHO:4
“Meta-analyses in systematic literature reviews have reported that the use of N95 respirators compared with the use of medical masks is not associated with any statistically significant lower risk of the clinical respiratory illness outcomes or laboratory-confirmed influenza or viral infections …
At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID- 19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”
At the time, WHO recommended that cloth masks “should only be … used by infected persons … in community settings and not for prevention.”5 However, like Fauci, the WHO has vacillated on a number of measures, and in its October 20, 2020, update,6 the WHO is now back to urging people to use masks “as part of a comprehensive strategy of measures to suppress transmission and save lives.”
And, despite the fact that there are no quality standards for cloth masks at all, they recommend wearing a fabric mask unless you’re in a higher risk group. Medical grade masks are only recommended for those over 60, people with underlying health conditions, those who feel ill and/or those caring for an ill family member.
Policy Review Found No Support for Universal Masking
A policy review paper7 published in Emerging Infectious Diseases in May 2020 — the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s journal — also found no evidence to support universal mask wearing as a protective measure in non-health care settings. According to the authors:
“Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza …
Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids …
There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure.
Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza … In this review, we did not find evidence to support a protective effect of personal protective measures or environmental measures in reducing influenza transmission.”
Another meta-analysis and scientific review8 — which focused on randomized controlled studies rather than observational ones and was led by respected researcher Thomas Jefferson, cofounder of the Cochrane Collaboration — posted on the prepublication server medRxiv in April 2020, found that, compared to no mask, mask wearing in the general population or among health care workers did not reduce influenza-like illness (ILI) cases or influenza.
In one study, which looked at quarantined workers, it actually increased the risk of contracting influenza, but lowered the risk of ILI. They also found there was no difference between surgical masks and N95 respirators.
Jefferson also wrote an interesting article9 for the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), posted July 23, 2020, in which he provides a brief review of these studies. In it, he also bemoans the fact that lack of scientific evidence is being hidden by politics.
Policy Makers Lean on Low Quality Evidence
In an October 28, 2020, Wall Street Journal opinion piece,10 Joseph Ladapo, an associate professor at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine, points out that “A hallmark of COVID-19 pandemic policy has been the failure of political leaders and health officials to anticipate the unintended consequences of their actions,” and that includes mask mandates.
“First, consider how the debate has evolved and the underlying scientific evidence. Several randomized trials of community or household masking have been completed,” Ladapo writes.
“Most have shown that wearing a mask has little or no effect on respiratory virus transmission11 … In March, when Anthony Fauci said, ‘wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better’ but ‘it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think it is,’ his statement reflected scientific consensus, and was consistent with the World Health Organization’s guidance.
Almost overnight, the recommendations flipped. The reason? The risk of asymptomatic transmission. Health officials said mask mandates were now not only reasonable but critical. This is a weak rationale, given that presymptomatic spread of respiratory viruses isn’t a novel phenomenon in public health …
The public assumes that research performed since the beginning of the pandemic supports mask mandates. Policy makers and the media point to low-quality evidence, such as a study of COVID-19 positive hairstylists in Missouri or a Georgia summer camp with an outbreak.
These anecdotes, while valuable, tell us nothing about the experience of other hairdressers or other summer camps that adopted similar or different masking practices. Also low-quality evidence: Videos of droplets spreading through air as people talk, a well-intended line of research that has stoked fears about regular human interactions.”
Speaking of videos showing how speaking disperses potentially contaminated droplets, for each such video, there’s another showing the other side of the argument. For example, the video below shows how the vapors from an e-cigarette flows right through the surgical mask. If vapor can flow through, airborne viruses do too.
Do Masks Reduce Infection Rates?
Ladapo does highlight one study published in Health Affairs in June 2020, which found that U.S. states with universal mask mandates saw a 2% reduction in growth rates of positive COVID-19 tests compared to states that did not mandate masks. Over time, even “modest reductions can translate into large differences,” he notes. Maybe, maybe not. Consider what Jefferson notes in his CEBM article:12
“Norway’s Institute for Public Health reported that if masks did work then any difference in infection rates would be small when infection rates are low: assuming 20% asymptomatics and a risk reduction of 40% for wearing masks, 200,000 people would need to wear one to prevent one new infection per week.”
Either way, even if masks do reduce infection rates somewhat, that’s still different from suggesting that universal mask wearing will bring the pandemic to an end.
“The most reasonable conclusion from the available scientific evidence is that community mask mandates have — at most — a small effect on the course of the pandemic. But you wouldn’t know that from watching cable news,” Ladapo writes.
“Claims that low mask compliance is responsible for rising case counts are also not supported by Gallup data,13 which show that the percentage of Americans reporting wearing masks has been high and relatively stable since June. Health officials and political leaders have assigned mask mandates a gravity unsupported by empirical research.”
Now, while it may be tempting to hitch the entire pro-mask argument on that Health Affairs study, remember that good science must be reproducible, and in this case, other investigations have found states’ mask rules appear to have had nothing to do with infection rates after all.
In his article14 “These 12 Graphs Show Mask Mandates Do Nothing to Stop COVID,” Yinon Weiss points out that “No matter how strictly mask laws are enforced nor the level of mask compliance the population follows, cases all fall and rise around the same time.” To see all of the graphs, check out Weiss’ article15 or Twitter thread.16 Here are just a select few to bring home the point:
Masks Cannot Shield Us From Harsh Realities
Perhaps the least scientific recommendation of all is the rule to wear masks outdoors. A contact-tracing study17 that looked at 318 COVID-19 outbreaks involving at least three people found that just one single incident could be traced back to outdoor transmission.
“By paying outsize and scientifically unjustified attention to masking, mask mandates have the unintended consequence of delaying public acceptance of the unavoidable truth,” Ladapo writes in his WSJ opinion article.18
“In countries with active community transmission and no herd immunity, nothing short of inhumane lockdowns can stop the spread of COVID-19, so the most sensible and sustainable path forward is to learn to live with the virus.
Shifting focus away from mask mandates and toward the reality of respiratory viral spread will free up time and resources to protect the most vulnerable Americans …
Until the reality of viral spread in the U.S. … is accepted, political leaders will continue to feel justified in keeping schools and businesses closed, robbing young people of the opportunity to invest in their futures, and restricting activities that make life worthwhile.”
Journals Refuse to Publish Negative Mask Study
The most recent evidence of all, which would bring us quite a bit closer to settling the argument about masks is a Danish randomized controlled trial of 6,000 people that sought to prove the usefulness of face masks against COVID-19 infection. The problem appears to be that it didn’t, because the researchers can’t get it published.
According to the researchers, the study will be published as soon as “someone dares to do so.” Considering the argument against mask wearing has been the lack of evidence, if this COVID-19 specific trial actually shows that it works, why would journals refuse to publish it?
The controversy has been covered in a Twitter thread19 by Alex Berenson, a former New York Times reporter. A cursory translation of the study,20 which is currently only available in German, reveals that it found mask wearing resulted in tens of millions of contaminations that can occur each day as people use the masks inappropriately, touch their faces and neglect to wash their hands.
For this reason, universal mask wearing may actually do more harm than good. This is clearly important information that should be disseminated to the general public, yet medical journals are preventing that from happening. As reported by the CEBM,21 several trials are currently registered in which they are looking to assess the effectiveness of various masks against COVID-19. Time will tell what the findings will be, and if we’ll ever find out about them.
Undisclosed Mask Dangers
Kennedy and Hammond also discuss evidence suggesting chronic mask wearing has its risks and may lead to other unintended health effects, such as:
• Lung damage and pathological consequences from inhaled mask fibers — One paper22,23 that has yet to undergo peer-review suggests mask fibers can pose a health risk when inhaled. According to the authors:
“If even a small portion of mask fibers is detachable by inspiratory airflow, or if there is debris in mask manufacture or packaging or handling, then there is the possibility of not only entry of foreign material to the airways, but also entry to deep lung tissue, and potential pathological consequences of foreign bodies in the lungs …
If widespread masking continues, then the potential for inhaling mask fibers and environmental and biological debris continues on a daily basis for hundreds of millions of people. This should be alarming for physicians and epidemiologists knowledgeable in occupational hazards.”
• Aggravation of asthma — Another potential concern is related to the plastics used. For example, surgical masks are made of polypropylene,24 a known asthma trigger.25 If you have asthma, wearing a surgical mask could potentially worsen your condition.
• “Mask mouth” (tooth decay, gum line recession and potent bad breath) is an effect dentists around the world have raised alarm about. Dr. Rob Ramondi, a dentist and cofounder of One Manhattan Dental told the New York Post:26
“We’re seeing inflammation in people’s gums that have been healthy forever, and cavities in people who have never had them before. About 50% of our patients are being impacted by this.”
• Hypoxia-related complaints such as fatigue, headaches, shortness of breath and anxiety.27,28
• Increased infection risk — According to Dr. Russel Blaylock, face masks “pose serious risks to the healthy,” as the mask can lead to a concentration of viruses in the nasal passages where they can “enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.” Frequent touching of your face and mask can also increase the infection risk.
Majority of People Testing Positive Are Faithful Mask Wearers
In closing, a recent CDC analysis reveals 85% of patients testing positive for COVID-19 wore face masks “often” or “always” in the two weeks preceding their positive test. It’s not a randomized controlled trial, which is the gold standard, but it does tell us that, by and large, face masks do not appear to offer very good protection. If they did, infection would favor the non-wearers.
Meanwhile, mask mandates strip us of our individual sovereignty and humanity. As noted by Hammond, mask mandates really appear to be more about teaching us to obey orders, no matter whether they make sense to anyone or not. It’s about teaching compliance and, unfortunately, many who have never looked at the science aid and abet the technocratic overlords’ cause by shaming those who don’t comply.
I predict it is likely that, at some point in the future, a tradeoff will be offered: Mask mandates will be dropped provided everyone gets vaccinated. By then, many may be willing to take just about anything as long as they don’t have to wear a mask anymore.
I would encourage you to read up on the many open questions relating to fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccines before making your decision. Overall, it seems the best way to avoid having to make such a devious trade is to engage in civil disobedience now, and go unmasked.
The following information comes from insider interviews with Ellis Medavoy and Richard Bell, two people I interview extensively in my collection, The Matrix Revealed. This is just a brief taste of what they have to say…
Major institutions on this planet that control Military, Money, Energy, Government, Medical, Corporate, Media, and Education are becoming, more and more, global cartels, horizontally integrated across national borders.
This is more than a top-down command process. It’s organically evolving. Three steps forward, two steps back. There is a great deal of competition among the components of a given cartel, but there is also cooperation. And in the long run, the see-saw is tipping in the direction of cooperation, as these entities realize they may well have more to gain that way.
I can’t stress too strongly this EVOLVING process. All attempts to merely assume twelve men in a room run the planet fall woefully short.
Instead, over time, people who lead a powerful institution (like Energy, for example) look out and recognize more major players, and in this recognition there is an impulse to compete and win and destroy, but there is also an impulse to build commonality and therefore monopolize the entire territory.
During one conversation with retired master propagandist Ellis Medavoy, I asked him about the extent of mutual cooperation in his given field, psychological warfare. He responded:
“Twenty years ago, I would have said we were all operating separately and jealously. Each of us was mining his own contacts and building his false pictures of reality for the masses. But then things began to change. Globally. First of all, more of us were pushing the same holograms. And because communication and travel were speeding up so rapidly, we were working a lot of the same venues. We would run into each other more often. We began to share information. I mean, it was cautious. We weren’t gushing with unbridled love, I assure you. The competitive factor was still strong. And we had fights. But through all that, we began to see through the fog, so to speak. We began to understand the effectiveness of cooperating. We would test each other with privileged information, to see if we could trust each other to keep it private. A tidbit here, a tidbit there.
“And you see, behind us, other groups were finding commonality, too. For example, in the area of medical propaganda, where I operated a lot of the time. And these groups saw they could join together for specific operations, on an international scale. They could push enormous lies globally, and everyone of their class would profit and gain wider control. So I would find myself working with a psy warfare guy from, say, France, or Germany in a joint venture. We would rub elbows. We’d be feeding from the same basic money trough.
“We’d both be briefed by a team of intelligence experts, and those experts would be of several nationalities. Slowly, I saw a new kind of umbrella structure emerging.
“See, suppose during the secret lead-up to a planned economic crisis [money cartel], you can distract everybody with a phony epidemic [medical cartel]. Do you see? Leaders perceive a reason to cooperate. Planners become more intelligent and clever. They reach across lines they never would have reached across before…
“You begin to see the outlines of a much more inclusive future structure. This is multi-front warfare.”
Richard Bell, another former insider, said to me: “People like to assume that money is everything. If you can limit the amount of money the public has, eventually they weaken and cave in and they’re easier to control. And this is certainly true. But on the other hand, as mega-corporations gain more power and range and markets, you have a clash, because those corporations, which are now cooperating in ways they never have, as a cartel in some respects, want customers for their products. They don’t want abject poverty across the board. People have to be able to buy their products.
“So there is a heavy conflict. It’s a conflict between elite bankers [money cartel] and mega-corporations [corporation cartel]. It needs to be resolved through advance planning, over the long term. So now you have these powerful men sitting down and talking in a new way. Other big-time players get involved, too [government, media, energy cartels, for example].”
This is just the beginning of what these people have to say about the Matrix in their interviews and how it REALLY works.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Here are the contents of The Matrix Revealed:
* 250 megabytes of information.
* Over 1100 pages of text.
* Ten and a half hours of audio.
The 2 bonuses alone are rather extraordinary:
* My complete 18-lesson course, LOGIC AND ANALYSIS, which includes the teacher’s manual and audio to guide you. I was previously selling the course for $375. This is a new way to teach logic, the subject that has been missing from schools for decades.
* The complete text (331 pages) of AIDS INC., the book that exposed a conspiracy of scientific fraud deep within the medical research establishment. The book has become a sought-after item, since its publication in 1988. It contains material about viruses, medical testing, and the invention of disease that is, now and in the future, vital to our understanding of phony epidemics arising in our midst. I assure you, the revelations in the book will surprise you; they cut much deeper and are more subtle than “virus made in a lab” scenarios.
The heart and soul of this product are the text interviews I conducted with Matrix-insiders, who have first-hand knowledge of how the major illusions of our world are put together:
* ELLIS MEDAVOY, master of PR, propaganda, and deception, who worked for key controllers in the medical and political arenas. 28 interviews, 290 pages.
* RICHARD BELL, financial analyst and trader, whose profound grasp of market manipulation and economic-rigging is formidable, to say the least. 16 interviews, 132 pages.
* JACK TRUE, the most creative hypnotherapist on the face of the planet. Jack’s anti-Matrix understanding of the mind and how to liberate it is unparalleled. His insights are unique, staggering. 43 interviews, 320 pages.
* Several more interviews with brilliant analysts of the Matrix. 53 pages.
* The ten and a half hours of mp3 audio are my solo presentation, based on these interviews and my own research. Title: The Multi-Dimensional Planetary Chessboard—The Matrix vs. the Un-Conditioning of the Individual.
Understanding Matrix is also understanding your capacity and power, and that is the way to approach this subject. Because liberation is the goal. And liberation has no limit.
I invite you to a new exploration and a great adventure.
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Futurist entrepreneur Elon Musk has expressed doubts about the accuracy of coronavirus tests, after claiming to have been both diagnosed and cleared of the disease on the same day. The SpaceX and Tesla founder wrote on Twitter that he had been administered four tests for the virus over a 24-hour period, leading to contradictory results. […]
Reader: I have lots of questions for you Ben, mine are in English
1. Why do you now stand with, defend and exalt the UN like its peacekeepers have not been charged in Africa (and many other parts of the world) with child rape
Never have I stood with or exalted the UN. My view is it needs to be replaced with something that actually helps the planet. The UN is a privately owned Rockefeller front that should be kicked out of the US ASAP.
2. Why are you talking about the “reset” like it doesn’t involve the vaccine, microchip and tracker? We want NESARA – not the same thing
The WDS supports a reset that does not involve vaccines or microchips. It involves ending the current system of debt slavery that rules the West. NESARA was a good idea that has been used by criminals to con people out of their money.
3. Why do you talk about redistributing wealth like it does not actually mean stealing from one to give to another – blatant communism
We are talking about a one-time write off of debt and redistribution only of those assets that were stolen from the people through Federal Reserve Board fiat fraud. We are not talking about taking money from genuine entrepreneurs who create value and employment.
4. Why talk about the elite pedovores as if they are victims and we should “go easy on them” because you said, they were born into it, and didn’t know any better
What we are saying is that these people were born into a cult and either had to go along or be killed. We advocate eliminating the hardcore members who actually tortured and killed children but re-educating those whose only crime was to be born into these families.
5. Why do you talk about Pope Francis as if he has changed his ways and has suddenly decided to help his fellow man, same goes for the Rothschild Family – there are no “good” Rothschilds, they hate us, we are like bugs to them, their words not mine
My father worked with Pope Francies in Argentina during the dirty war and they helped save 20,000 people from the death squads. My father, who was Canadian ambassador to Argentina at the time gave them Canadian passports and Bergoglio (now Francis) helped smuggle them out of the country.
I do not agree with everything that he does but he does talk about saving the environment, world peace, and ending poverty, things I agree with.
6. I guess if you were going to turn on us, now would be the time, but to pull this on your own subscribers, to keep calling Trump a child rapist while failing to point it out in every single sick sadist listed above is absolute hypocrisy, I trust my discernment, following someone who makes fun of those who believe in Jesus was where I went wrong.
If the allegations about Trump are false, then I apologize for discussing them. However, if somebody publicly accused me of raping children, I would sue them. Why doesn’t he sue?
Finally, about posting video links in Japanese, I just want my readers to know I have people who follow my work in Japan as well as elsewhere and this was intended for them. Japan is a key battleground country because if we can liberate the country, then it will be much easier to liberate the US.
A meticulous analysis of Ancient Egyptian history and study of archaeological evidence indicate that there were two sphinxes located at the Giza plateau near the Pyramids, argues a researcher who has spent more than a decade searching for the lost “second” Sphinx. “Have you ever seen just one Sphinx in later Egypt that didn’t have […]
AIM Patriot Ramola sends us this tweet with the attached video. Thanks, Ramola!
Please give her video testimony a chance. It takes her a while to relax and get to the important details. UK patriots must listen to this! The Pilgrims Society’s GENOCIDE operation is now being actively rolled out in the UK where citizens will be vaccinated, marked, and eventually exterminated.
Shhh…let you in on a little secret. In jest, Douglas said to Mike in the last audio that President Trump might consider Mike to be in charge of the FCC and we all chuckled. He would be hired in as one of those new “F” class employees.
But then Mike called back and said…. hmmmm. That would be an excellent placement for me. But I would have to ask President Trump to take out three layers of SES, to which we reminded him that the President was already working on that. You know, patriots, Michael McKibben is overqualified for that job…plus as a member of the Cabinet, he could advise the president in many related matters.
SEND MIKE TO WASHINGTON!
AIM Patriot Aimee reminds folks about the fraud in the lottery programs. We reported about this several years ago – that they are huge scams and money laundering operations. But we didn’t know this, Aimee writes:
“Smartmatic does Power Ball and Mega Millions as well. It goes through agostini&sons in Milan Italy. They handle many of the privy council accounts like A.T.F. What would be the odds the lotteries are rigged as well. That would be black hat money that should be suppressed.”
AIM Patriot Grace sends us this lovely note:
My husband and I heavily rely on your website for true and accurate news. Information you present were so vital for us to connect dots of bits and pieces we were exposed to in the past. I don’t recall how we found you about a couple of year ago, but we are so glad we did.
We are so grateful and want to express thanks for your incredible work. We always are so impressed by the work done by all, and how you are able to identify root causes of multiple issues we are observing out there.
We wish you can continue this work because we feel Trump’s second term is just as important as the first one when it comes to the information warfare that is raging out there. So far, I have not found any other sources that can compare to the information you find.
Thank you again and we pray that God will richly bless you for all the hard work you put in.
Our reply: We are all in, Grace, as long as we can stay in our easy chairs with these amazing mini-biomats. We turn them side ways and let the amethyst crystals energize our etheric bodies.
Some things are just done best the old fashioned way…like making love, baking cookies, and voting. Simple and natural.
Patriots, this is an information war. We are still active citizen forces in the internet. Some call us information warriors; the prez calls us keyboard warriors. Get serious now and up your game. Start getting into the enemy’s Twitter, Facebook, and social media and lay down some truth mortars. Take pro-tips from AIM Patirot KazimirRampant.
Get to their children and weaker members of their family and connections. Do not personally threaten with harm, but ok to fire truth bombs.
This beautiful video is offered by AIM Patriot John who remembers when we posted material on cymatics. Whenever I see the beautiful patterns of a crop circle, I wonder what kind of being who resonates at this higher frequency touched Earth for a moment and left its vibrational signature in a corn or wheat field. Not extraterrestrials or aliens, but indications of an angelic hierarchy…perhaps angel, bringing us signs of life beyond our own?
(Jennie Taer) BLEXIT founder Candace Owens is suing independent social media fact-checkers as she and other prominent conservative voices online continue to be censored, especially during a presidential election. The lawsuit names Facebook fact-checkers USA Today and Lead Stories Fact Checker, according to Fox News.