Round Table Update Discussion 2-5-21, with Juan O Savin, Ann Vandersteel, David Nino Rodriguez and Charlie Ward

Excellent roundtable with all those mentioned in the title. There’s notes on this, plus one other, video, here. I’ll place the text of that below the video.

Now, one point about this Bitchute video… I tried and tried and tried and tried and tried and tried and tried and tried and tried to get the Bitchute link to play smoothly, but I had MANY problems with it, so… I found a way to download the video and upload to a storage location. Anyone having challenges playing it may use this link to view the video (it’s 100 MB size).
Download link


Notes, from Operation Disclosure:

Fri. morning 5 Feb. Charlie Ward Roundtable:

Juan O’Savin: A list of close confidants to Trump were arriving at Mar a largo this weekend. It was obvious that B*iden was on a stage other than the Oval office. The courts and Congress have failed in their duty to protect the Constitution so the Military has taken control with a mandate to install a lawful Republic. This illusion was all going down in a few hours. We have air craft carriers off both coasts. What you are hearing and seeing are very different from what is really going on. You are hearing tidbits. We have hard and overwhelming evidence that Trump decisively won the 2020 Election by over 80%. The Military has the responsibility to insure that the Constitution was enforced. The US Inc. was bankrupt. The false claims against corporations and Wall Street assets get off our back. Trump brought back the troops because this was where the fight was. We could get a Cuban Missile Crisis moment to awaken the people.

Charlie Ward: As of Mon. 1 Feb. the QFS was in place and as of last Sun. 31 Jan. the fiat SWIFT system was no more. What the Stock Market was doing in manipulation of the Market has been stopped. The Democratic Party has been overcome by the Chinese Communist Party. As of Jan. 20 12:01am EST a legitimate Military was in charge. That declaration of Martial Law was sent to the Mainstream Media and they refused to air it and thus committed treason. That was the end of MSM. Journalists who don’t stick to the narrative were threatened. The power was with the Military, not with B*iden or H*arris. The Inauguration was not real. Trump verified with the Supreme Court that if there was any foreign interference with the 2020 Election it would be declared void. The US Inc. is bankrupt and that is verified. On Nov. 3 Trump did the EO that verified NESARA. We were now in the 120 days to March 3 transitioning from a bankrupt corporation going back to the 1776 Constitution.

They have recovered a lot of bodies and body parts beneath the White House.

Nino: The White House looks like a prison. Arrests are already happening. B*iden appears to be at Castle Rock Studios in Hollywood. They were allowing B*iden to pretend to be president so the public could be red pilled.

Fri. morning 5 Feb. Charlie Ward confirmed from people on the ground that the Military have rescued children found in rooms and tunnels constructed underneath the White House. Black vans have picked the children up for medical treatment and de briefing.

People on the ground also spotted a lot of body bags going into the area. They evidently discovered a lot of bodies. Trump did not know about this and was not allowed in certain areas. Trump stated, “If I were president, no one would stop me from going in to see, but I do not know the circumstances.”

It was suspected that the tunnels ran for at least 200 miles.

Are Digital Pills in Your Future?

It sounds a little like science fiction — take a pill at home and your doctor is notified. Nevertheless, this may be the future of medicine and it’s been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. It was November 13, 2017, when the FDA announced the approval of the first digital pill — Abilify MyCite — for the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression.1

The pill is designed to digitally track whether you’ve taken your medication and then send a compliance message to your smartphone and even your doctor if you approve of it doing so. Three years later the digital medication costs well over $1,500 for a 30-day supply, even through discount drug provider GoodRx.2

The cost is also nearly 30 times the cost of the generic pill for a 30-day supply. Schizophrenia affects approximately 1% of the population, yet a meta-analysis of 31 studies involving 51,925 people who were homeless found there is a significantly higher prevalence of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder and schizoaffective disorder in that population.3

The estimate of the prevalence of all psychotic disorders in the homeless population was 21.21%, and of schizophrenia alone was 10.29%. Plus, the number of individuals who are homeless with serious mental illness has been on the rise since the 1970s4 — which means that, even if the digital pill proved to successfully help manage a person’s schizophrenia and improve compliance, the cost of the technology may be far out of reach for those who need it most.

The Future of Medication May Arrive Soon: Digital Pills

The first digital pill system approved in 2017 required the individual to wear a sensor and used a cellphone app.5 According to Dr. George Savage, co-founder of Proteus Digital Health, maker of the first digital pill, the system was first conceived more than 200 years ago.

Within the digital pill is a sensor which includes copper and magnesium that operates similarly to a battery first developed 200 years ago. The compound in the pill generates a current, which runs a silicon chip. This sends a simple signal to the adhesive you wear on your stomach.

The system generates a current for only three minutes, just enough time to send the signal and for the sensor to gather the data. Information about the time you took your pill and your activity level is then sent to a cellphone app and, with your consent, onward to your doctor.

Although the system was unique, technology-driven and intended to improve drug adherence at the time it was conceived and developed, there was no evidence to prove it raised medication compliance.

More than three years later and under new leadership by EtectRx, which acquired Proteus when Proteus went into bankruptcy, there is renewed focus on determining whether it improves patient adherence.6 Now called the “ID Cap System,” the technology is set to make remote patient monitoring easier and to allow “real-time intervention” of doctors with their patients.

Digitals Pills Scheduled for an Upgrade

As CEO for etectRx, Valerie Sullivan talked about the differences between etectRx, Proteus and other companies in the market. Reiterating that her company is different because their focus is almost exclusively on patient compliance, including branding and clinical trials, Sullivan said:7

“This pandemic era we’re in has ramped up interest in telehealth generally. The remote patient monitoring that ID-Cap System enables can reduce clinical trial costs, eliminate non-adherence among patients and allow for real-time intervention with them.”

In early January 2021, MedCity News reported that etectRx teamed up with Pear Therapeutics to develop products combining the technology from both companies.8 They announced the initial project will be on medication related to mental health. In a phone interview with MedCity News, Sullivan commented on the “value in having patients see for themselves and feel empowered that when they take their medication, they feel better.”9

These digital pills will also contain wireless sensors embedded in the medication to communicate with a wearable lanyard device, as opposed to a patch stuck to your stomach. Pear and etectRx have not yet partnered with pharmaceutical companies to produce the technology for existing medications.

Digital Medicine May Be a Tough Pill to Swallow

Sullivan anticipates there may be some pushback from patients, doctors and even drug makers. Digital Commerce reported that British consulting firm L.E.K. Consulting found the technology may not be as well received as the digital pill companies hope.10

Although advocates believe the technology may improve outcomes by offering precise information about a patient’s use, experts anticipate it will be nearly a decade before these become routinely used in health care delivery.

L.E.K. believes among the biggest obstacles are the drug makers and the doctors. As Digital Commerce reported, Harsha Madannavar, managing director and partner at L.E.K., wrote in the report:11

“There is a degree of skepticism among pharmaceutical companies and some physicians. Pharmaceutical companies, like other large organizations, can be notoriously slow to integrate innovative technologies or platforms.

Physicians, particularly those in large hospital systems, have barely enough face time with patients and even less time to adapt to new care-delivery models or new decision-making paradigms.”

Speaking with a journalist from The New York Times, Ameet Sarpatwari from Harvard Medical School expressed concern about the technology, saying it “has the potential to improve public health, [but] if used improperly it could foster more mistrust, instead of trust.”12

Patients would be able to decide if their doctor and up to four other people could receive the data showing when the pills were taken. Patients would also have access to a cellphone app that could let them change their mind and block recipients later.

But some question whether this technology may also be an invasion of privacy and whether individuals may feel pressured to allow their doctors to monitor their medication. Dr. Peter Kramer, psychiatrist and author, believes digital technology may be ethical for a “fully competent patient,” but questions whether a digital drug may potentially become a “coercive tool.”13

Some experts believe that older adults, who wish to have help remembering to take their pills, may welcome these devices. Other potential uses for this type of technology can be expanded as well as incentivized by insurance providers to monitor opioid use and clinical trial participants, or to use as a condition for parole or release from a psychiatric facility.

On a different note, in 2019 Proteus announced it was testing a chemotherapy digital pill on patients with colorectal cancer.14 Again, the idea was to improve outcomes by ensuring medication adherence. The difference between this pill and the one for schizophrenia was it was not necessary for the chemotherapy pill to go through a round of regulatory approval based on the way in which the sensor was packaged within the capsule.

Technology Meant to Provide an Answer for Compliance

The chemotherapy drug was administered through Fairview Health Services in Minnesota, where the health care system paid Proteus in the hopes that it would help save them money by improving patient outcomes. The contract stated Fairview paid when the cancer patient took their chemotherapy as prescribed by their physician 80% of the time.

When patients didn’t meet the threshold, the digital pill company did not get paid. Despite plans to become a high-tech generic drug manufacturer, Proteus’ vision ended with its bankruptcy — with some experts saying the failure was on the part of the company and not the result of failed technology.15

Specifically, according to digital health venture fund and research group Rock Health, Proteus may have paid the price for a tactical choice by picking a “therapeutic area with a degree of difficulty that’s an eight or nine out of 10.”16 Even so, while the digital pill companies are taking aim at medication adherence, it may not be a fiscally responsible direction.

When medication is the only intervention sought, poor adherence can result in health complications and increased costs.17 This means that medication adherence and patient compliance are health care challenges the system seeks to overcome.

Data show some of the reasons why older adults do not adhere to their medication schedule include a lack of meaningful communication with health care providers, cost, fear of addiction, cognitive decline and medication side effects.18 That’s why chronic conditions, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, asthma and depression, require ongoing changes in lifestyle and nutrition to control the conditions.

The extent to which nonadherence affects patient outcomes varies widely across studies, having been reported as high as 92% and as low as 10%.19 Data show approximately 50% of non-adherence is intentional and the other half happens when patients are not aware they aren’t taking the medication as prescribed.

However, a team of doctors of pharmacy professionals believe that while medication adherence is a problem in Western medicine, it is not the only problem and may account for “only the third most frequent type of medication-related problem.”20 One pharmacist argues that science should not be solely aimed at compliance but, rather, adherence as a segment of medication optimization.21

Tied to medication optimization is adherence and a number of other factors that affect downstream costs such as adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, therapy failure and dosing problems.

Seek Out the Root of Your Health Condition

Many health conditions respond to lifestyle and nutritional choices. For instance, there are data to show people with schizophrenia who are low in vitamin D,22 folic acid and vitamin B1223 have more severe symptoms. In other words, there are nutraceutical interventions that help reduce symptoms of schizophrenia,24 depression,25 anxiety26 and many other health conditions.

Before becoming at risk for polypharmacy, or the use of multiple medications at one time to treat an ailment, and the side effects, seek out and work to correct the root of the health condition. Many times, there are lifestyle and nutritional changes you can make that have a significant impact on your overall health, and the symptoms or treatment of your health condition.

Prescription medications come with side effects, and oftentimes doctors prescribe a second medication to treat the side effects of the first. However, medications typically only mask symptoms and do not address the underlying condition, setting up a vicious cycle.

Although many pharmacy computers may flag drug interactions, the chemical complexity involved within your body when you’re taking multiple drugs make it challenging to avoid adverse reactions.

There are no magic pills — digital or otherwise — that fix symptoms or health conditions. In order to address your illness and restore your vigor, it is necessary to make changes to your lifestyle and your nutritional habits. Here are several articles to help you take a step toward achieving your health goals:

Vaccination and Censorship: The Truth Will Set Us Free

On December 22, 2020, a nonprofit limited company based in Great Britain that calls itself the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)1,2,3 published a report titled “The Anti-Vaxx Playbook.”4

It contains false and misleading information about the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination, which was sponsored by the 39-year-old U.S. nonprofit educational charity the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), and held online in October 2020. Promotion of the CCDH report resulted in the spreading of fake news and misinformation by mainline media outlets in Great Britain and the U.S.5,6,7,8,9

NVIC’s pay-for-view digital conference10 was transparently open to the public and featured presentations by 51 speakers from the U.S. and other countries discussing vaccine science, public health policy and law, informed consent and civil liberties.

Dedicated to “Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century,” the conference was made available on February 2, 2021 for free viewing online. Go to NVIC.org11 to access the conference website and watch all of the presentations.

CCDH Misinformation Campaign Designed to Discredit, Destroy NVIC

Influence Watch, which monitors individuals and groups that influence12 public policy, describes CCDH as a “London-based advocacy group that targets accused ‘hate groups’ and individuals for de-platforming campaigns to remove them from major social media outlets” and “has ties to the left-wing British Labour Party and British left-progressivism.”13

The anonymously funded CCDH also has an office in Washington, D.C. and the defamatory publicity campaign created in December 2020 was designed to not only discredit NVIC’s four-decade public record of working within the U.S. democratic system to secure vaccine safety and informed consent protections in public health policies and laws, but to destroy our small charity.

The misinformation campaign was spearheaded by the CEO of CCDH, who is a political operative14 personally affiliated with Great Britain’s socialist Labour Party.15,16,17

The report deceived readers by describing NVIC’s 2020 conference as a meeting “recently held in private over three days,” which implied secrecy,18 even though the event was transparently open to the public just like the four previous vaccination conferences NVIC hosted in 1997, 2000, 2002 and 2009.19

One British tabloid read the report and described NVIC’s public conference as a “private conference call” where “secret plans” were plotted to “launch the largest ever misinformation campaign about vaccines.”20

Last summer, CCDH published their first report alleging that Big Tech companies operating social media platforms make big profits by allowing individuals and organizations criticizing vaccine science, policy and law to message on their platforms,21 and should take stronger action to censor online public conversations about vaccination that do not conform with the “scientific consensus that vaccines are safe.”22,23

That July 2020 report was promoted by mainline media outlets in Britain24,25,26,27 and the U.S.28 However, CCDH’s report published five months later in December 2020, which created fake news and misinformation about NVIC’s conference, contained even more inflammatory rhetoric.

It demonized those who criticize vaccine safety as “malignant actors,”29 and CCDH demanded that companies and governments virtually eliminate individuals or groups publishing information online that fails to align with government and industry narratives about vaccination and public health policy.

In that report, CCDH ordered Big Tech companies and governments to censor and punish dissenters, charging that “anything less than the dismantling of these individuals’ profiles, pages and groups and permanent denial of service, now they know what is happening, is willing acquiescence.”30

On January 18, 2021, the anonymously funded CCDH once again publicly attacked the National Vaccine Information Center, this time for applying for a U.S. Paycheck Protection Program loan to secure the continued employment of NVIC’s 21 workers during massive nationwide unemployment caused by lockdowns.

The British nonprofit company appeared to suggest that the U.S. government should not have been viewpoint-neutral in granting relief loans, but should have applied an ideological litmus test to NVIC’s loan request that was made to retain employees during catastrophic economic hardship caused by lockdowns that have affected donations to charities.31

CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed said, “Lending money to these organizations so they can prosper is a sickening use of taxpayer money.”32 Once again, mainline media outlets in Britain and the U.S. widely promoted CCDH’s allegations.33,34,35,36,37

Six months of orchestrated public attacks on NVIC by CCDH have generated hate mail to our small charity, which was founded and has been led by parents of vaccine-injured children for four decades.38

Strong Freedom of Dissent History in US

I was born into a post-World War II generation in the U.S., a generation known for challenging the status quo and exercising the right to dissent, which is protected under the U.S. Constitution.39

Whether it was advocating for the right to listen to rock ‘n’ roll and joining antinuclear protests in the 1950s,40,41 or marching in support of civil rights and opposing an undeclared war in Asia in the 1960s,42,43 or women fighting for equal opportunity and pay and consumer activists working for environmental protection and car safety laws in the 1970s,44,45,46,47 or mothers protesting against drunk drivers48 and choosing a drug-free birth and breastfeeding for their babies in the 1980s,49,50 the baby boomer generation has been known for exercising freedom of thought and speech. 

Contentious social, political and health issues of the 20th century sparked heated debates on college campuses,51 where students could still explore, critique and openly search for truth, and in mainline newspapers, magazines and radio and television stations, where point/counterpoint examination of controversial topics was the hallmark of good journalism because public debate is the hallmark of free speech.

The America where I grew up in the mid-20th century was a beacon of hope for people living behind the Iron Curtain52 and in other totalitarian or authoritarian societies,53 where exercise of freedom of thought, speech and conscience and the right to dissent and peacefully assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances had been eliminated, where people had been turned into silent indentured servants working to serve a small ruling class in control of the state.54

Statists, who believe that economic control and planning must be in the hands of a highly centralized government,55 are always afraid of the truth, afraid that people armed with knowledge will act together to challenge control of the state by a powerful and privileged few.

Without Debate, Without Criticism ‘No Republic Can Survive’

I was in junior high school when President John F. Kennedy addressed the American Newspaper Publishers Association in 1961. He said:56

“Without debate, without criticism no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.

And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment — the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution — not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply ‘give the public what it wants’ — but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.”

He closed with these words:

“So it is to the printing press — to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news — that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help, man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”

That speech given 60 years ago was a ringing endorsement for freedom of the press. Yet, in the 21st century, it is becoming clear that there are political operatives and corporations seeking to censor freedom of thought and speech by citizen journalists publishing analysis and perspective on the worldwide web, an electronic communications network that has been the world’s biggest forum for free speech over the past quarter century.57,58

Right to Dissent, Freedom of Speech Under Assault in America

The right to dissent59 and exercise freedom of thought, speech and conscience60 is under assault in America,61 even though these cherished civil liberties are codified into the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. And civil liberties are under assault internationally in other nations with representative democracies, as well.62

Today, political operatives are pressuring government, media corporations and other institutions to eliminate freedom of speech, especially public conversations about vaccine science, policy and law.63,64,65

Spirited public debate about vaccine safety and mandatory vaccination laws has been going on for more than two centuries.66,67 What is the justification for censoring that public conversation now and punishing those who engage in it with economic and social sanctions?68,69

And if the public conversation about vaccination and health can be censored, what topic will be the next one put on the “no fly” list?70,71

NVIC: Working to Reform Vaccine Policy and Law for Decades

I am a co-founder and president of the highly rated nonprofit educational charity established in 1982 and known today as the National Vaccine Information Center.72,73 Our mission is to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education. NVIC does not make vaccine use recommendations. We advocate for the human and legal right to make informed and voluntary decisions about vaccination without being coerced or punished for the decision made.74

Our not-for-profit charitable organization was established for one reason: We were mothers and fathers of children brain injured by the highly reactive pertussis vaccine in the DPT shot and we wanted a safer pertussis vaccine to replace the one that had hurt our children. That goal was accomplished after 14 years of consumer advocacy when a less reactive acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine was licensed for babies in the U.S. in 1996.75

We also wanted parents to have access to accurate and full information about the risks and complications of both diseases and vaccines before children are vaccinated, so parents and pediatricians could work together to identify those children who are more susceptible to vaccine reactions and protect their health.

That is why we worked with Congress to secure vaccine safety informing, recording, reporting and research provisions in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, a law in which the U.S. government officially acknowledged for the first time that vaccine safety should be made a national priority because federally licensed and recommended and state mandated childhood vaccines can and do cause permanent injuries and even death for some children.76,77,78

We are not all the same. We do not all react the same way to pharmaceutical products,79,80,81 which is why our organization has strongly supported research into genetic, epigenetic, environmental and other risk factors that make some individuals more susceptible to adverse responses to vaccination.82,83

We believe every life is important, and that the lives of those harmed by vaccines and infectious diseases should be equally valued and protected.

We believe that consumer advocacy has and should continue to play an active role in holding pharmaceutical companies and government agencies accountable for vaccine product safety, and we are dedicated to working responsibly within the democratic system of this Constitutional Republic to make health policy and law safer and more effective for everyone.84,85,86

Since 1988, I and other NVIC representatives have served as consumer members of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee, FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines, Vaccine Policy Analysis Collaborative and other federal and state public engagement projects discussing vaccine science, policy and law issues with vaccine developers, federal and state health officials, medical trade and pharmaceutical industry representatives, and members of other nonprofit organizations.87,88,89

My 22 years of service as a consumer member on federal advisory committees and public engagement projects includes four years as a member of the Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Forum at the National Academy of Science, where I helped to coordinate public workshops on vaccine science, policy and law issues90 and was an editor for the report on Risk Communication and Vaccination published by the National Academy Press. That report importantly stated:91

“The goal that all parties share regarding vaccine risk communication should be informed decision making. Consent for vaccination is truly ‘informed’ when the members of the public know the risks and benefits and make voluntary decisions.

The discussion of mandatory vaccination at the workshop suggested that it may interfere with informed consent and may damage trust and deter effective communication, and thus needs to be carefully weighed against its benefits.”

We believe the human right to freedom of thought, speech and conscience should be respected, not devalued. As public health regulations and laws are being created during the coronavirus pandemic to restrict or eliminate civil liberties,92 we should be encouraging people to have civil conversations about vaccination, health and autonomy. Americans should be welcomed by legislators to participate in — not be shut out of — the democratic law making process.93

When people feel disenfranchised and believe that those in power do not care about their lives or the lives of their children, that is when trust in government is lost and people let fear, anger and despair control their actions. Empowering people with knowledge and the hope they can help effect meaningful change if they do it in a rational and constructive way has always been one of NVIC’s guiding principles.94

Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination Features Principled, Courageous Speakers

I want to thank the generous sponsors and attendees of the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination: Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century, who helped to make it financially possible for NVIC to host a virtual conference last fall.95

The conference had been scheduled for two years to be held in October 2020 in a hotel in the Washington, D.C. area. When travel and social distancing restrictions were enacted in the spring of 2020, we had to make a choice between canceling the conference or pivoting to a pay-for-view online public conference.

We chose to hold the conference online because we knew that the controversial issues being debated in the public square this year needed a public forum where well-anchored information and perspective could be presented.

We owe a debt of gratitude to the more than two dozen principled and courageous scientists, physicians, holistic health professionals, authors, attorneys, faith leaders, parents of vaccine injured children and civil and human rights activists, who represent diverse areas of expertise and participated in our conference.96

NVIC Will Not Abandon Our Mission

No matter how many political operatives, corporations and institutions threaten and try to discredit NVIC and our work in order to silence us, we will not abandon our 40-year mission dedicated to preventing vaccine injuries and deaths through public education and defending the ethical principle of informed consent. We are moving forward with faith and resolve that we can secure a future for America that protects health and autonomy in the 21st century.

Because we know that if the state can tag, track down and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individuals’ freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.

Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could have done to change tomorrow. It’s your health. Your family. Your choice. And our mission continues. No forced vaccination. Not in America.

Cat Report


To share this website, please use this archive link:

Stop Thinking Small! Squeeze that silver and save the world!



VIDEO $4797 Silver: The Debt Clock Squeezing Life Out Of The Dollar



Blowback: Hedge Funds Ramp Up Security Amidst “Death Threats”, “Obscene Messages”


VIDEO It would be hard for SEC to regulate social media: Fmr. SEC chairman

VIDEO: Last SLV audit was the Friday before EFP Market Broke

They just halted trading of GameStop after it gained 40% this morning. THE FIX IS IN!


VIDEO The Great Reset and the Zoom Accord.

More and more malls are going bust and turning the keys over to the banks. Will this trend further erode the financial condition of banks? Foreclosed malls are not seeing buyers and one mall just left Deutsche Bank high and dry. Read all about it.

Lord Jacob Rothschild Lifts the Veil

Mike LIndell: Absolute Proof of Election Rigging


VIDEO Watch #CNBC and Jim Cramer downplay the #SilverSqueeze

Fox News Cancels Lou Dobbs’ Show

Amazon stole $62 MILLION in tips from delivery drivers and the fed is telling them to give it back


GAB with the GABriels



Mike Lindell (via 2-5-21 VIDEO… “Absolute Proof: Exposing Election Fraud and the Theft of America”

This video is well worth watching. I watched the whole thing. It presents person after person and data set after data set after data set about the 2020 election, and the major voting discrepancies that occurred across the USA, and the international interference. It includes appearances by Mary Fanning, Gen. McInerney, and a variety of other people “involved” in the election.

If one part “stood out”, it’s at 1:35 (1 hr. 35 min.), where Mary Fanning goes through all the data that was collected, followed by a very colorful graphical depiction of how the vote changing was done and exactly where it came from.

Thanks to all of those who pointed me to this. The original link is, and I immediately went to YouTube link someone sent. So I downloaded the video immediately (as MP4) and saved the audio (as MP3). Fortunately I did that, as, about 20 minutes later, I tried viewing it and… it had disappeared (from YouTube). Later I found it on Rumble, at the CRTNOnline channel. That video is posted below.

Video Link

Since I view this as a landmark video, below is listing of the places I’ve found where it may be viewed: