Public International Notice — Notice to Vacate

 By Anna Von Reitz

1. The commercial organizations that have been hired by the British Government(s) and the Holy See to provide governmental services stipulated under the three (3) Federal Constitutions have been terminated in bankruptcy; our contracts are not with these subcontractors, but their bankruptcy and bad performance does impact us, and we do have cause to manage our own affairs and to make decisions with respect to the new service providers.  

2. Our actual contracts are with the Principals– the Pope, the Queen, and the Lord Mayor of London.  We have not approved and do not have contracts with any of the new Municipal Corporations and/or Territorial Corporations which are seeking to create contracts by Assumption of Contract in Succession;  

3. We have specifically provided Notice to the other Principals and have denied any assumption of succession by the Biden Administration for Cause. Mr. Biden is a self-admitted influence peddler and crook; there is, therefore, no controversy.  He admits it.  We accept that admission. The number of our Municipal Employees and Dependents who may or may not have voted for Mr. Biden is a moot issue. This decision not to hire the Biden Administration and not to allow it to represent us  and forbidding access to our credit is a business decision, made by lawful Deputies, and it may not be presumed against; 

4. We are the Employers and the Presumed Donors of the Public Trusts; as Donors we have returned and demanded the liquidation of the Public Trusts and the return of the Assets, unharmed and unencumbered. This includes all State Trust and Cestui Que Vie Trust Assets, all gold and silver assets purloined and deposited offshore, domestic and overseas investments, and all credit owed to the American States and People. We have provided the means to accomplish this removal of the artificial trust structure(s) that have been imposed under False Legal Presumptions and have allowed for a safe and gradual transition to State Assembly control; 

5. All the territories that entered Territorial Statehood between 1860 and 1959 have been enrolled as States of the Union and have entered in to their true capacity as States according the Equal Footing Doctrine as of 1 October 2020; 

6. All Territorial State-of-State organizations are provided Notice to Vacate and must begin withdrawal and transition planning. Municipal STATE OF STATE organizations which should not exist under the provisions of the Federal Constitutions have already had ten (10) years to reorganize and liquidate their business interests and are, together with their Federal Agencies, not being allowed to continue unlawful and unconstitutional incursions.  

7. It is unfortunate that this very significant down-sizing and removal of Municipal Interests is necessary, but it is clearly contra-indicated by our Founding Agreements, our Will, and our Public Intent— not to mention being contrary to common sense and our practical benefit. The mistaken presumption that the Municipal Government represented our civilian government in our purported “absence” has resulted in our States and People being charged for a complete redundancy of Federal and federated state-of-state services by two self-interested  commercial corporations, both in the business of providing governmental services. As a result,  we have been paying for two  departments of labor, two departments of defense, two court systems, two political administrations, and we have been putting up with not only the cost, but the confusion and infighting that results from this duplication of effort. 

8.The actual State Assemblies are now in Session and prior assumptions of authority seized upon by the Territorial and Municipal Government Contractors and their respective state-of-state organizations must be released in an orderly, gradual, and peaceful manner without fear or rancor. Provision for the necessary transfers of authority and measures to re-task and re-employ people affected by this necessary restructuring are underway and should prove beneficial for all concerned. 

9. All members of the General Public and International Investors as well as all members of State-of-State Legislatures have cause to know that as of 1 October 2020, all State Trust interests and all assets contained therein, have reverted to the living people of these Several States of the Union and these assets are not available for any continued speculation, use as collateral, sale, encumbrance, or abuse by the members of the United States Department of Justice serving as the US TRUSTEES nor by members of the United States Congress serving as United States Trustees together with their heirs and assigns, nor are any State Trust assets subject to any sale, distribution, secondary administrative contract, or other agreements entered into by state-of-state legislatures;  

10. The Enrollment of the Western States has been made effective with and retroactively contemporaneous with their original entry into Territorial Statehood; all right, title, and interest must be yielded to those Americans who have returned and who are daily returning to their lawful standing on the land and soil of this country; 

11. As a matter of Law and of proper Public Administration, all rights, titles, duties and interests in the international and global realm which were once exercised by the Confederation of the States of America and the Federal Republic have returned by Operation of Law to our unincorporated Federation doing business as The United States of America which was and is the Delegator of all mutually-held Delegated Powers of the actual States; 

12. Also as a matter of Law and proper Public Administration, all rights, titles, duties and interests in the national and local government realms vest in the State and County Assemblies which are now in Session for the first time in many years, and all foreign trusts and foreign trust interests otherwise presumed to exist are dissolved; 

13. The return of the actual American Government to full force and function cannot be accomplished overnight, but the foundational work to rebuild and reconstruct both the Confederation of the States of America and the Federal Republic is underway and ongoing; as the only true Sovereign Interests in this country representing all people of all ethnicities, races, religions and backgrounds, our State Assemblies hold aloft the banner of national sovereignty and self-determination, and through their unincorporated Federation of States, they similarly uphold the ideals of individual freedom and self-determination, and yet also fully accepts voluntary cooperation with other nations for the advancement of mutual peace, security, friendly trade, social and cultural exchange, and environmental issues; 

14. In the transition period, there will be a migration of elements of the American Armed Forces to occupy the position of the original Federal Republic, which is ultimately an instrumentality of our unincorporated Federation.  In this way the function of the original American Federal Subcontractor can be restored without  having to complete the entire Reconstruction first.  Mr. Trump is selecting those elements of the American Armed Forces necessary for the task before us and they are being funded on a temporary basis until the actual final Reconstruction is in place and the entire American Government is functioning as intended. 

15.  Mr. Trump will be called upon to help us secure all those American assets that have been held offshore in diverse locations and we are all obligated by international law to return control of those recovered assets back to the actual unincorporated Union of States doing business as The United States, which is our domestic National Government of the Several State Assemblies, for reassignment of a portion of those assets to our unincorporated Federation, The United States of America, which is our international and global government, which then assigns resources to the Confederation and the Federal Republic which Mr. Trump and elements of the American Armed Forces, particularly The United States Army and The United States Air Force and The United States Space Force will be occupying. 

16. These assignments and the correct lawful and legal arrangements have already been made and stand upon the Public International Record of the Uniform Commercial Code, but it remains under the watchful eyes of the international community to be sure that no further substitutions or impersonations or other legal chicanery is attempted by the British or other European Interests seeking to derail or delay our process or impersonate our lawful unincorporated government again;  

17. Upon the receipt of control of our returned trust assets we shall be authorizing the minting of United States Silver Dollars for domestic use, and American gold coinage for use internationally; this does not imply that credit-based notes will be removed from circulation, but necessary changes will be made across a spectrum of currency products that are either based on other commodities or are commercial or military scripts; we do not anticipate that anyone needs to be harmed in this process at all; 

18.  We have thus far published the Enrollment of the States created during and after the so-called American Civil War and the first American Public Law in over a hundred years, which establishes punishments and prohibitions for corporations seeking to meddle with the natural genome of individual people using nanotech and patented genetic materials to create the basis to claim these same people are Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) subject to ownership by the patent holders.  We have also published and re-issued, several years ago, our renewed Sovereign Letters Patent and our recognition of The Declaration of Independence of 4 July 1776 as the Source and Foundation of our lawful American Government;

19.  The renewed Sovereign Letters Patent referenced above are our acknowledgement and receipt of those land and title interests which are ours by venerable Grant and Treaty Agreements made before, during, and after The War of Independence, and these renewed Sovereign Letters Patent represent our peaceful and mutual sharing of land and soil interests among the living people present within the borders of each one of the Several States, including the members of the Native American Nations, who are as individuals welcome to participate in the State Assemblies and who are inheritors of all the same constitutional guarantees and protections;

20. We formalized and recorded and gave International Notice of these actions to make it clear that we are the lawful Possessors and Inheritors and we are in full command of our records, our history, and our depository receipts, grants, treaties, land patents, and all presumed titles and deeds issued in our purported absence.  We are not confused or incompetent or engaged in any war or controversy and wish only for a peaceful and lawful and logical way forward for our country and for the rest of the world;  

21. Our government is not now nor has it ever been engaged in oppressing anyone, dictating any religious belief,  harming or depriving anyone based on their race or ethnicity, promoting any system of bondage, or depriving anyone of the full enjoyment of their assets both public and private;

22. We recognize and everyone else must recognize that while there are urgent needs to be addressed throughout the world, the necessary and lawful changes will not happen instantaneously or occur at the same pace in all places; a daunting process of evaluation and education lies ahead not only for America and Americans, but for the rest of the world community.  We embrace these challenges and opportunities in a spirit of brotherhood and with great determination to preserve all that is best in our communal past, while forging in the present time a firm and happy and simple basis to go forward into the future; 

23. As part of our dedication to making government simple, sensible, and non-invasive, a great many of the more than 80 million statutory laws, codes, and regulations which have resulted in such nullities as victimless crimes and thought crimes and unconscionable infractions will be set aside.  Both the injustices promulgated by this proliferation of private statutory laws and the economic burden of enforcing them is unsupportable and not in any sense necessary for nor conducive to the Public Good;

24. Legislation which has imposed upon the Natural and Unalienable Rights of individuals and those rights and prerogatives guaranteed by the Constitutions will similarly be rooted out, set aside and nullified, resulting in the release of many prisoners who have been victims of state-of-state, Territorial, and Municipal Prisons-for-Profit schemes; 

25. Along with the long overdue nullification of these burdensome and often oppressive or nonsensical statutory laws comes the similar restructuring and removal of Administrative Codes and Administrative Agencies. The gross duplication of governmental services created in this country and the degree of public ignorance regarding the applicability of Administrative Codes which have no authority outside the corporate administration of our subcontractors will similarly be addressed;

26. All the reforms referenced above necessitate a similar reform of the court system(s) which have been administering the enforcement of these statutes and codes and expediting their improper imposition upon the General Public.  Our American Justices will be returning to their proper places as Administrators and Comptrollers and those Lesser Courts of strictly limited jurisdiction, including the courts of Special Admiralty and their Judges, will be retired and circumscribed as the American Courts revive and the lawful duties and limited jurisdictions of the foreign courts are imposed.  Most particularly, Hired Jurists and Territorial and Municipal elected Judges are advised to recognize the actual identity of Americans misaddressed by court summons and faulty case initiation processes, so as to avoid further trespasses against their Employers; 

27. All Political Parties which have been endured and employed as a means to foment constant Public Policy debates related to our foreign subcontractors and their incorporated commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services— are merely lobbyist organizations similar to labor unions or professional associations like the Bar Associations and the American Medical Association — all of which are foreign with respect to our actual American Government and devoid of any authority related to our States, our People, and our Country.  The elections which have resulted from the activities of such organizations are self-evidently private corporation elections, and do not, as they have misrepresented, result in public elections nor the lawful occupation of public offices. While we stop short at this time of outlawing such organizations generally, we do insist that their activities be disclosed for what they are, and that all those elected and appointed to private corporate offices as a result: (1) perform their constitutional duties; (2) observe the limitations of their offices; (3) fully disclose all impacts, obligations,  effects, resulting legal presumptions, and applicability of registration processes– including Voter Registrations; (4) fully disclose the limitations, applicability, and results of their foreign licensing agreements and foreign guild requirements, in the event that any American thus fully informed should choose to participate or imagine that these foreign requirements and practices have anything whatsoever to do with them.  

28. Insurance is legalized gambling, and in our purported absence, a vast compendium of insurance services and insurance conglomerates with ties to international organized crime have sprung up on our shores and have been used for purposes of money laundering, unjust enrichment, and illegal investment pooling.  While we realize the short term benefits that can be gained by individual investments in various forms of insurance and the institutional profits that can be realized by allowing the insurance industry to exist, we also observe the social evils associated with insurance: bonding of assets, failure to pay, widespread unilateral and unconscionable contracting practices, misrepresentation of Insured Parties, and so on.  The insurance industry like the even more corrupt and corruptible securities industry, has been operating without competent Third Party oversight in virtually all States of the Union; this situation requires the establishment of State-mandated Third Party oversight and enforcement, consumer protection and Ombudsman services specific to the insurance industry, and insurance arbitration services available to the General Public; 

29. Securitization of living flesh is illegal; it has been illegal and unlawful since the days of slavery and was universally outlawed on a planetary basis as of 1926.  Yet, we observe the current situation promoted by the labor bonding practices of the Municipal United States Government and its co-conspirators at the Federal Reserve and DTCC, which have all promoted a ghastly trade in securitized labor and securitized living flesh despite the clearly worded prohibitions which stand as Public Law throughout the known world. The loophole used to promote this abhorrent situation is our guaranteed freedom to contract and the inability of the government to restrict our ability to contract. This freedom has been used as a means to enslave us via unconscionable contracts with babies and other minors, undisclosed third party contracts entered into “for” us by people pretending to be our agents, trustees, executors, or others in power over our affairs and assets, and military press-ganging which has been outlawed for over 200 years.  These claims ask us to entertain the idea that we can choose to enter into contracts to perform illegal acts, subject ourselves and others to criminal practices, enter into unilateral contracts with ourselves and other personas representing ourselves, be subject to contracts we are totally unaware of, and via the exercise of our freedom to contract,  justify any kind of criminal activity whatsoever so long as there is a contractual obligation present.  These practices, claims, and the social insanity predicated upon them are fully denied and rebutted by our Public Law, our actual binding contract requirements, and most of all, by the illegal, unconstitutional, and unlawful results of these foreign legal practices and presumptions being misapplied to Americans— all of which serves to make the Municipal United States Government sponsored by the Holy See and those corporations conspiring with it to engage in these contracting practices, recognizable as an international crime syndicate engaged in crimes against humanity.  Our Municipal Subcontractors are responsible for the misdirection and misadministration of their hirelings and franchises; they have cause to know the limitations of their service contracts, the Public Law of this country, and their own obligations to anyone born on our soil; they have deliberately and with apparent malevolent and self-interested intent built a foreign, evil, invasive, and unauthorized criminal empire on our shores in contravention of our Public Law and in violation of International and Global Law; they have employed falsified records, impersonation, constructive fraud, and barratry to do it.  As a result of these crimes and the usurpation against our lawful government evidenced by the spread of Municipal Government enclaves and activities far beyond the limitations set by our constitutional agreements already noted, corrective measures have been taken and will continue until the entire criminal edifice is extracted, together with the corporations and interlocking trust directorates and individuals connected to these activities and practices. 

30. In 1865, the Territorial United States Government failed its duty to fully inform and support the Federation of States. The same Territorial United States Government claimed emergency powers that were never granted to it, and used this claim as an attempt to justify its continued abrogation of its own constitutional limitations and obligations owed to the American States and People.  In 1868, this same Territorial United States Government created a Scottish commercial corporation merely calling itself “The United States of America” — Incorporated, and in an act of undisclosed constructive fraud and attempted legal enclosure, published the Articles of Incorporation as “The Constitution of the United States of America”.  In 1870, this same Territorial United States Government acting as the U.S. Congress, claimed that it had the right to issue corporate charters in our names—- something never authorized or granted to the Territorial United States Government, and naturally residing by Operation of Law and Jurisdiction with our unincorporated Federation of States. 
In 1871, these same jackals exercised this false claim of power and authority to create multiple Municipal commercial corporations in our names and used these as instrumentalities of the District of Columbia.  They also claimed to own all United States Corporations and the assets thereof as personal property.  Every iota of this was accomplished under conditions of fraud, non-disclosure, and treasonous usurpation against our actual American Government and all of it was done by self-seeking foreign Employees on our payroll, being either: (a) misdirected by the foreign Principals responsible for their activities, or (b) being allowed to run wild and do all of these things by the other Principal Parties to the Federal Constitutions without oversight.  In all cases, the British Monarchs, the Lord Mayors of London, and the Popes –who owed us “Good Faith and Service” in these matters were derelict and criminally negligent in the performance of their duties, including the duty to protect and inform their Employers. A similar situation accrued to the misadministration of our Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Offices.  As a result, corrective measures have been taken and will continue to be taken.  The ownership interest in United States Corporations belongs to our unincorporated Federation of States, The United States of America, and to the States and People of this country, in whose names these entities were created under conditions that are otherwise constructive fraud and without any vestige of authority to exercise any such sovereign power; all corporations formed since 1860 “in the name of” either the United States or the United States of America are subject to the ownership and authority of the unincorporated American Government and our Public Law, including the Federal Constitutions. All such corporations have been given one (1) year to correct and amend their Articles of Incorporation accordingly, or choose voluntary liquidation. 

31. Our relations with the Pope, the Queen, and the Lord Mayor of London are, understandably, quite strained as a result of these criminal activities and various forms of usurpation which have been employed and allowed to prosper against our lawful government.  Various other Bad Faith abuses of actual Delegated Powers by these same Parties such as Giveaway Trade Agreements, Federal Block Grant kickback programs used as inducement to evade constitutional obligations and unlawfully convert local governments, especially city governments, and widespread improper enforcement of foreign contracting processes and forms of law, including the Spanish Law of the Inquisition, and participation in foreign tax schemes such as the “New Green Deal” and American Wealth Redistribution schemes predicated on the idea that our entire country was “abandoned” and without a government,  and claims by the self-interested Creditors of our foreign Subcontractors that all our assets distributed worldwide were “unclaimed” and “abandoned” —all of this and more serves for prickly Foreign Relations going forward, as it is abundantly apparent to all Parties that we have been horrendously disserved by our Employees and the Principals responsible for their employment at our expense, for the past 158 years. 

32.  As disturbing as all this is, together with the fact that our supposed friends and allies have in fact proven to be our most intractable and unkind and dishonest detractors, it is nonetheless the Truth.  Our Affidavit of Probable Cause has been published worldwide and distributed worldwide since 2015 as part of our book, “You Know Something Is Wrong When….An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” and wet-ink signed and witnessed copies have been provided to the Principals and other responsible officials; courts serving in the international and global jurisdictions have been given proper Notice and Invocation of the Law, including the International Court of Justice, the Court of the Lord High Steward, and the Vatican Chancery Court— and all have been moved to action upon Maxims of Law pertaining to the forms of law they each employ.  The fundamental crimes of fraud, Breach of Trust, and piracy both on the High Seas and Inland Piracy, form a common thread impacting all jurisdictions of the actual Public Law on this planet.  Those who have been compartmentalized and left unaware of these circumstances must now awaken and undertake correction, together with those of us who have already labored long and faithfully in the cause of decency and freedom for Mankind. 

                                                       Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                                                       The United States of America

The Web of Elite Extremists Behind Censorship of Mercola

As detailed in “The Web of Players Trying to Silence Truth,” the Publicis Groupe, a global PR firm, appears to be at the center of a large network involving Big Tech, Big Pharma, the U.S. government and global nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that work in tandem to further the globalist Great Reset agenda.

As you might expect, when you’re trying to implement a global regime change, you need to exercise very serious control over both the media and the public discourse. If you don’t, you might have a rebellion on your hands when people realize that what you’re doing is not in their best interest.

And, for that, you need some sort of central propaganda organization. Of course, you don’t want the manipulation to be glaringly obvious, so you set up a variety of NGOs, foundations, “public interest” organizations and “grassroots” groups to give the appearance of consensus between independents.

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) is but one of many, many examples of groups that appear to serve as front groups for a particular agenda.1 You can be solidly assured that when an organization takes over a million dollars from Bill Gates their ability to produce high-quality investigative journalism is impaired and financially influenced..

TBIJ Produces Another Gates’ Hit Piece

I’ve written many articles over the years about attempts by various groups and organizations to smear my credibility and label this site as a fake news hub. The latest attempt comes from TBIJ, which recently asked for my rebuttal on a number of statements they were about to publish2 about me with regard to my stance on vaccines and COVID-19.

“Misinformation about these topics can hinder public health efforts to control the coronavirus pandemic and undermine the ability of individuals to make accurately informed decisions about vaccines,” TBIJ’s Jasper Jackson wrote in his email.

One of the statements slated for publication that I was asked to respond to is that the articles posted on my website and social media channels “often include misinformation about the pandemic, the coronavirus or vaccines, as well as misinformation on other topics.”

One such article, which was singled out, is “How COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ May Destroy the Lives of Millions” which, according to Jackson, “includes the false claim that vaccines being distributed in the U.S. and elsewhere are ‘an experimental gene therapy that could prematurely kill large amounts of the population and disable exponentially more.'”

According to Jackson, there have also been “numerous fact checks articles” about my “publication of misinformation stretching back to the early 2000s.” His article will further claim that “The primary purpose of Mercola’s articles and social media activity are to drive sales from his various health businesses.”

This is a classic and time-honored strategy that is frequently used to discredit any source that disagrees with their agenda. Many may not recall that for the first three years after I started this site, I did not sell anything and subsidized the half a million dollars it cost me to run the site out of my medical practice.

Every content site relies on a source of revenue, either through subscription fees or advertising. Or, in the case of TBIJ, taking dirty money from the Gates Foundation who has an agenda when it comes to his investments in the pharmaceutical and GMO/chemical agriculture industry.

Then, as now, advertisers have a way of influencing the content, and I am free to report the truth without taking advertisers’ bottom lines into account. My content has expanded over the years and remains 100% free to the public. 

Guess Who Funds TBIJ?

TBIJ is funded by Bill Gates,3,4 a leading force within the technocratic takeover movement who doles out money to anything and anyone that will help further the globalist agenda, including media.5 As recently as November 2019, TBIJ was given a $1,068,169 grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for an advocacy program related to “Global health and development public awareness and analysis.”6 Other TBIJ sponsors include:7

The Google News Initiative, which sponsors fellowships at the TBIJ.8

George Soros’ Open Society Foundation which, not at all surprisingly, funds projects involving “shadow wars and decision machines.”

The Wellcome Trust,9 the largest charity in the U.K. that funds “innovative biomedical research.” It was formed in 1936 after the death of Sir Henry Wellcome, a pharmaceutical pioneer and progressive industrialist. Their board consists of present or former bankers, insurance executives and investment board members.

Wellcome also funds the Science Media Centre (SMC), a PR firm that specializes in reshaping public reality, manufacturing consent and manipulating beliefs and behaviors. Wellcome and SMC also have the shared goal of educating and training other media.

All of these — Gates, Google, Soros and Wellcome — are easily identified as parts of the technocratic globalist network. So, it’s not surprising to find TBIJ attempting to discredit and censor those critical of the globalist agenda which, of course, includes protecting and promoting the COVID-19 vaccine program.

After all, the COVID-19 vaccination program is bound to be the most profitable vaccine program in the history of medicine, seeing how the plan is to vaccinate 7+ billion people, and not just once or twice, but probably every year going forward.

And, as reported by Columbia Journalism Review,10 while fact checkers have slapped a “false” label on the claim that the Gates Foundation has financial investments in companies making COVID-19 vaccines and therapies, “the foundation’s website and most recent tax forms clearly show investments in such companies, including Gilead and CureVac.”

In his email, Jackson also asked me to comment on planned statements regarding warning letters sent to my business from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the FDA’s confirmation that a recall of my Organic Cocoa Cassava bars had occurred in 2016.

Why would TBIJ focus on the essentially irrelevant voluntary recall of organic coconut bars as a concern when the real issue they need to be exposing is their acceptance of over $1 million from Gates? Why? Because Gates has been fined well over $1 billion for serious regulatory breaches — $800,000 in 2004;11 $32 million in 2005; and $1.3 billion in 2008.12

Vaccines or Gene Therapy?

As for my description of mRNA “vaccines” as gene therapy, any serious rational and objective assessment would never qualify this as a false claim.

Think of it in the most simple terms.  mRNA are snippets of genetic code that carries instructions for cells to produce proteins.  The definition of genetic is ‘relating to genes’ and genes contain instructional code that tell the body what proteins to make.

Therapy is the medical treatment of disease, so mRNA vaccines are very clearly gene therapy. 

As noted by David Martin, Ph.D., (see video above), Moderna’s SEC filings specify and stress that its technology is a “gene therapy technology,” originally intended for cancer treatment. It’s mechanism of action also confirms it to be gene therapy. So, it’s gene therapy.

Furthermore, these products don’t meet the medical definition of what a vaccine actually is and does, so where’s the counterargument? According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,13 a vaccine is “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”

Immunity, in turn, is defined as “Protection from an infectious disease,” meaning that “If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.” Neither Moderna nor Pfizer claim this to be the case for their COVID-19 “vaccines.”

In fact, in their clinical trials, they specify that they will not even test for immunity. The sole purpose of these products is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

I challenge TBIJ to present evidence that these mRNA injections function in the same manner as conventional vaccines such that they meet the medical definition, and that they are not, in fact, gene therapies. Don’t just argue that I’m wrong. Prove me wrong.

Fact: mRNA Technology Has Unproven Safety Record

The mRNA gene therapies currently being misleadingly marketed as “vaccines” admittedly turn your cells into bioreactors that churn out viral proteins to incite an immune response, and there’s no off-switch.14

They are fast-tracked products released under emergency use authorization — animal trials were skipped and human trials aren’t even completed yet — and based on historical and preliminary evidence, significant short- and long-term side effects are, quite frankly, inevitable. This novel, never before used therapy has a long list of potential problems, including the following:

The messenger RNA (mRNA) used in many COVID-19 vaccines are synthetic. Your body sees these synthetic particles as non-self, which can cause autoantibodies to attack your own tissues. Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., explained this in her interview, featured in “How COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ May Destroy the Lives of Millions.”

Your body also views free mRNA as a warning signal to your immune system, as they drive inflammatory diseases. This is why making synthetic mRNA thermostable, meaning it doesn’t break down as easily as it normally would by encasing the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles is likely to be problematic.

COVID-19 vaccines use PEGylated lipid nanoparticles, and PEG is known to cause allergic reactions and anaphylaxis.15,16

Previous attempts to develop an mRNA-based drug using lipid nanoparticles failed because when the dose was too low, the drug had no effect, and when dosed too high, the drug became too toxic.17 What has changed that now makes this technology safe enough for mass use across all ages and preexisting health conditions?

The synthetic RNA influences, in part, the gene syncytin. According to Mikovits, when syncytin is aberrantly expressed in the brain, you can develop multiple sclerosis. Expression of the syncytin gene also inflames and dysregulates communication between the brain microglia, which are critical for clearing toxins and pathogens in the brain. It also dysregulates your immune system and your endocannabinoid system, which calms inflammation.

The recommendation to vaccinate individuals who have previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2, or who have an active SARS-CoV-2 infection, could be very dangerous, according to Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, who sent a public letter18 to the FDA Commissioner detailing these risks.

Reports in the medical literature have also highlighted the risk of pathogenic priming and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). For example, in “Out of the Frying Pan and Into the Fire? Due Diligence Warranted for ADE in COVID-19,” the authors explain:19

“ADE is an immunological phenomenon whereby a previous immune response to a virus can render an individual more susceptible to a subsequent analogous infection.

Rather than viral recognition and clearance, the prior development of virus-specific antibodies at a non-neutralizing level can facilitate viral uptake, enhancing replication; a possible immune evasion strategy avoiding intracellular innate immune sensors, or pattern recognition receptors …

ADE of SARS-CoV has also been described through a novel Fc?RII-dependent and ACE2-independent cell entry mechanism. The authors state20 that this warrants concern in the safety evaluation of any candidate human vaccines against SARS-CoV … This also illustrates that ADE is not always indicative of disease pathology but raises concern for the immunocompromised.”

Similarly, “Pathogenic Priming Likely Contributes to Serious and Critical Illness and Mortality in COVID-19 Via Autoimmunity,” published in the Journal of Translational Autoimmunity, warns that:21

“Failure of SARS and MERS vaccines in animal trials involved pathogenesis consistent with an immunological priming that could involve autoimmunity in lung tissues due to previous exposure to the SARS and MERS spike protein. Exposure pathogenesis to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 likely will lead to similar outcomes.”

We apparently don’t even know if antibody production is truly protective or pathogenic in coronavirus infections, according to a December 11, 2020, paper22 in the journal Vaccine: X, which states:

“The first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine(s) will likely be licensed based on neutralizing antibodies in Phase 2 trials, but there are significant concerns about using antibody response in coronavirus infections as a sole metric of protective immunity.

Antibody response is often a poor marker of prior coronavirus infection, particularly in mild infections, and is shorter-lived than virus-reactive T-cells … Strong antibody response correlates with more severe clinical disease while T-cell response is correlated with less severe disease; and antibody-dependent enhancement of pathology and clinical severity has been described.

Indeed, it is unclear whether antibody production is protective or pathogenic in coronavirus infections. Early data with SARS-CoV-2 support these findings. Data from coronavirus infections in animals and humans emphasize the generation of a high-quality T cell response in protective immunity.”

Sadly, just as I accurately predicted, there’s no shortage of media stories reporting side effects in those receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, including sudden deaths of healthy individuals.23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41 And rest assured, the casualties will continue to mount.

One very serious side effect that has emerged is thrombocytopenia, a rare blood disorder that has been reported in at least 36 Americans shortly after COVID-19 vaccination.42,43 This is what led to the sudden death of a 56-year-old Miami Beach doctor. Symptoms emerged within three days of receiving the Pfizer vaccine. He died two weeks later.

Sure, mainstream media assure us that a link between the vaccine and this lethal condition has not been proven, but to dismiss lethal effects that occur within days in otherwise healthy individuals requires some serious suspension of disbelief.

There were no problems accepting that people who got a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and then died — having struggled with heart disease or cancer for years — actually died due to the infection. Something had to be done.

Now, healthy people are dying within hours or days after vaccination, and we’re to just shrug that off as random coincidence. We’re to believe they would have keeled over from the same problem even if they didn’t receive the gene therapy.

In a paper44 titled, “COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease,” published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Dr. Bart Classen also warns there are troubling evidences suggesting the mRNA shots may cause prion diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

Based on this readily available data, I believe my projections that these gene therapies “could prematurely kill large amounts of the population and disable exponentially more” is materializing before our eyes. So, again, I challenge TBIJ to rebut, with actual data, all of those reports before they claim I’m peddling misinformation. 

Political Powerbrokers Call for Massive Censoring

That there is a powerful network behind the current efforts to eradicate truth tellers is impossible to miss. The coordination alone — between politicians, Big Pharma, mainstream media, Big Tech, “philanthropic” foundations, NGOs and intelligence agencies — is evidence that this is no minor side project.

Even Congress45 and the Biden administration have reportedly reached out to social media companies, urging them to clamp down on “COVID-19 misinformation” before it goes viral.46

As noted by Glenn Greenwald in a February 20, 2021, substack article,47 “In their zeal for control over online speech, House Democrats are getting closer and closer to the constitutional line, if they have not already crossed it.”

I would argue they have indeed crossed the line, seeing how U.S. House Democrats from California — Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney — have gone so far as to demand a dozen cable, satellite and streaming TV companies to censor or remove Fox News, Newsmax and OANN, allegedly for the crime of rejecting “public health best practices.”

In his article48 on this rapid escalation of government calls for censorship, Greenwald states that “Democrats’ justification for silencing their adversaries online and in media — ‘They are spreading fake news and inciting extremism’ — is what despots everywhere say.”

“Since when is it the role of the U.S. Government to arbitrate and enforce precepts of ‘journalistic integrity’?” Greenwald asks.

“Unless you believe in the right of the government to regulate and control what the press says — a power which the First Amendment explicitly prohibits — how can anyone be comfortable with members of Congress arrogating unto themselves the power to dictate what media outlets are permitted to report and control how they discuss and analyze the news of the day?”

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr has strongly denounced the Democrats’ actions, calling it a “marked departure from First Amendment norms,” adding that the demands are “a chilling transgression of the free speech rights that every media outlet in this country enjoys … No government official has any business inquiring about the ‘moral principles’ that guide a private entity’s decision about what news to carry.”49

Peer-Reviewed Published Science Is Not Misinformation

While there are probably several intertwining and overlapping incentives behind the relentless push to get these gene therapies into everyone on the planet — even if it includes shutting down any news networks that once in a blue moon has the courage to report on open questions surrounding these products and other pandemic measures — protecting profits is undoubtedly one of them.

As reported by The Defender,50 drug industry lobbyists spent nearly $306.23 million to influence federal lawmakers in 2020 alone. Drug companies also spend about $30 billion on marketing each year (per 2016 data), $6 billion of which pays to propagandize consumers with 5 million universally misleading ads.51 That’s nearly 13,700 ads every day of the year, or 571 ads per hour, 24/7.

Still, despite that massive brainwashing operation, the truth has an appeal all its own. It’s direct. It’s logical. It doesn’t require complicated cognitive gymnastics and 1984-style double-think to “get it.” Most importantly, it can stand on its own against attacks devoid of substantial, data-backed counterarguments — which is why I don’t lose sleep over baseless hit pieces from TBIJ and other jackals bearing similar stripes.

DNRs Given to Learning Disabled COVID Patients

Do-not-resuscitate orders, or DNR orders, are medical orders that instruct heath care providers not to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event a person stops breathing or their heart stops beating.1 They’re typically set up in advance, prior to an emergency, after discussion with the patient and/or the patient’s family.

DNR status has been previously linked to severe illness, advanced age, poor disease prognosis and deteriorating health status with impending death,2 but during the COVID-19 pandemic, investigations suggest DNRs have been used improperly, including being assigned to people with learning disabilities without their knowledge or consent.

According to Edel Harris, chief executive at Mencap, a U.K. advocacy charity for people with learning disabilities, “Throughout the pandemic many people with a learning disability have faced shocking discrimination and obstacles to accessing health care, with inappropriate Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) notices put on their files and cuts made to their social care support.”3

The Care Quality Commission (CQC), which regulates health and social care in England, is investigating the practice, but their preliminary report released in December 2020 suggests inappropriate DNACPRs may have caused avoidable deaths.4,5

UK Commission Reiterates Need for Individualized Decisions

March 30, 2020, during the early days of the pandemic, CQC issued a joint statement with the British Medical Association, Care Provider Alliance and Royal College of General Practitioners, issued to adult social care providers and general practitioners (GPs).6

They noted that during the pandemic, it was more important than ever to have personalized advanced plans of care in place, particularly for older people, those who are frail or those with serious health conditions — and that those plans be discussed with patients.

As long as the person has the mental capacity, “this advance care plan should always be discussed with them directly,” the statement noted, and in cases when this wasn’t possible family members or other appropriate individuals should be involved. As if foreseeing an inevitable problem, the statement made a point to highlight the need for individualized advance care planning decisions:7

“It remains essential that these decisions are made on an individual basis … It is unacceptable for advance care plans, with or without DNAR [do not attempt resuscitation] form completion to be applied to groups of people of any description. These decisions must continue to be made on an individual basis according to need.”

By October 2020, the U.K.’s Department of Health and Social Care had asked CQC to review how DNRs were being used during the pandemic.8

At the time, CQC said they had heard of cases where decisions were not made using a person-centered approach, and they intended to review advance care planning decisions made in hospitals, care homes and by GPs during the pandemic. While the final review is expected to be released in early 2021, interim findings were released in December 2020.9

Report Reveals Inappropriate Advance Care Decisions

CQC’s interim findings suggest that advance care decisions were made inappropriately during the pandemic due to a “combination of increasing pressures and rapidly developing guidance.” They noted:10

“Early findings are that at the beginning of the pandemic, a combination of unprecedented pressure on care providers and other issues may have led to decisions concerning DNACPR being incorrectly conflated with other clinical assessments around critical care.”

In one example, CQC noted that guidance intended to assess frailty as part of a wider clinical assessment may have been used as the sole basis for decisions. This mistake was reportedly corrected, with revised guidance released within five days; however, it’s possible that some people may still not be receiving proper care. According to the report:11

“DNACPR decisions and advance care plans should only ever take place with clear involvement of the individual, or an appropriate representative, and a clear understanding of what they would like to happen.

While there is no evidence to suggest that blanket approaches to DNACPR decisions are being used currently, people who use services and groups that represent them told CQC that early in the pandemic they or their loved ones received DNACPR decisions which were not based on their wishes and needs, and without their knowledge and consent. It is unacceptable for decisions to be applied to groups of people of any description.”

Inappropriate DNRs May Still Remain in Place

Mencap received reports in January 2021 that some people with learning disabilities had been told they would not be resuscitated if they became severely ill with COVID-19.12 People with disabilities in England had a 1.9 to 3.5 times greater risk of death from COVID-19 compared to people without disabilities, according to a report by the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics.13

Keri-Michèle Lodge, a learning disability consultant, told The Guardian, “The biggest factor associated with the increased rate of death from their analysis was living in care homes or residential settings.”14

Public Health England also found that people with learning disabilities were six times more likely to die from COVID-19 than the general population, and this rose to 30 times more likely among those with disabilities aged 18 to 34.15

Rosie Benneyworth, chief inspector of primary medical services and integrated care at CQC further noted that the pandemic risked magnifying inequalities in the care people receive and acknowledged that inappropriate DNRs may still exist:16

“It is unacceptable for clinical decisions — decisions which could dictate whether someone’s loved one gets the right care when they need it most — to be applied in a blanket approach to any group of people.

Sadly, in the experiences that people have generously shared with us there is very real concern that decisions were made which not only overlooked the wishes of the people they affected, but may have been made without their knowledge or consent.

… We have also highlighted the fact that it is possible in some cases that inappropriate DNACPRs remain in place – and made it clear that all care providers have a responsibility to assure themselves that any DNACPR decisions have been made appropriately, in discussion with the person and in line with legal requirements.”

Amnesty International Uncovers ‘Blanket Approach’ to DNRs

In October 2020, Amnesty International also reported inappropriate use of DNRs by GPs, care homes, hospitals and clinical commissioning groups (CCGs).17 In their report, the nongovernmental organization said they had received reports from care home managers that CCGs had asked them to insert DNAR forms into residents’ files as a “blanket approach.”18

Family members also told Amnesty International that their relatives had been asked to sign DNAR forms without understanding them fully.

One document issued by CCGs to 35 GPs, seen by Amnesty International, told practices, “Search your clinical system for any care home patients who do not have a resuscitation order recorded (either ‘not for’ or ‘for’ resuscitation) and put appropriate orders in place” and “Ask the [care] home to check they have resuscitation orders on every resident.”

The document also gave instructions for GPs to prioritize patients who did not have a “do not convey to hospital” decision in place, and even included a script to facilitate such discussions, which discouraged hospitalization:19

“Frail elderly people do not respond to the sort of intensive treatment required for the lung complications of coronavirus and indeed the risk of hospital admission may be to exacerbate pain and suffering. We may therefore recommend that in the event of coronavirus infection, hospital admission is undesirable.”

In response to the document, 98 care homes were contacted, leading to distress, as in some cases care homes were told no residents over 75 would be admitted to a hospital. A senior local figure speaking to Amnesty International expressed his dismay:20

“Discussions on advanced care planning should be warm and natural conversations. This is not how they should be done. One care home with 26 residents had 16 residents sign DNARs in a 24-hour period. It was distressing for staff and residents … Care homes felt like they were being turned into hospices, and being asked to prepare to manage deaths instead of managing life.”

DNR Patients More Likely to Die From COVID-19

Assigning a DNR to a person with a learning disability or in any case without their knowledge can be the difference between life and death, including in the case of COVID-19.

Researchers from Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School investigated the influence of DNR status on mortality in hospital patients who died with COVID-19, revealing that people who died with COVID-19 were significantly more likely to have a DNR order on admission than those who recovered from the illness.21

COVID-19 patients with a DNR also had a higher mortality rate than COVID-19 patients without a DNR, with researchers noting, “The risk of death from COVID-19 was significantly influenced by the patients’ DNR status.” Separate research has also revealed that the way a DNR is interpreted can affect a person’s care. The researchers wrote:22

“While the definition of DNR might seem straightforward, its interpretation in clinical practice can be complicated. In this study, most of the nurses understood the meaning of DNR. Yet their interpretations often indicated clinical situations in which a DNR order was misaligned with the plan of care or was misinterpreted as replacing it.”

Confusion about the definition and implications is exactly what researchers found when they examined care based on a person’s DNR designation. Direct care nurses from a large urban hospital participated in an open-ended interview to gather information.23 When the data were analyzed, the researchers found varying interpretations on how to carry out DNR orders that resulted in “unintended consequences.”24

Since DNR orders and other advance directives may open other decisions to interpretation, affect patient care and outcomes and, as has recently been revealed during the pandemic, may be put into place without knowledge or consent, it’s important that you educate others and advocate for yourself or your loved one if hospitalization or placement in a care home occurs for any reason.

This may be especially true if you have a loved one with a disability, including a learning disability. Even during “normal” times, an estimated 1,200 people with a learning disability die avoidably under care of the National Health Service annually.25 During the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially in part due to inappropriate use of DNRs, these numbers may be even higher.

Article Video – Cowboy Ethics and Frontier Justice March 3, 2021 By Anna Von Reitz

Help support the work of Anna and the Living Law Firm here or look for the PayPal button on

Link to original article
Download and print

Follow Ed’s channel on Rumble
Follow Ed’s channel on LBRY$/invite/@edmovius:4

Watch and comment on Rumble

Fertility warning: 34 cases of spontaneous miscarriage and stillbirth reported after experimental mRNA vaccines

(Natural News) In the rush to vaccinate every man, woman and child against a year-old coronavirus strain, sacrifices are being made. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is now reporting thirty-four cases of miscarriage and stillbirth associated with the experimental COVID-19 vaccinations. The initial guidelines warn pregnant women not to partake in these real-world…

Coronavirus quarantine camp in Toronto runs out of food and water for prisoners

(Natural News) Canada’s new Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) quarantine “rules” for travelers returning from outside its borders are making headlines, and not in a good way. Angry mobs are reportedly forming in the lobbies of hotels that have been turned into makeshift concentration camps where those entering from abroad are being forced to stay, on their…