Federal Prosecutor Paused Hunter Biden Investigation Before Election, Shielding Then-Candidate Joe from Public Embarrassment

By Tyler Durden | 16 July 2021 ZERO HEDGE — As the 2020 US election entered the home stretch last summer, Delaware US Attorney David Weiss chose to pause his investigation of Hunter Biden at a critical stage […]

The post Federal Prosecutor Paused Hunter Biden Investigation Before Election, Shielding Then-Candidate Joe from Public Embarrassment first appeared on Winter Watch.

Russ Winter Rejoins Robert Phoenix to Discuss the Enormous Subject of Sabbatean Frankist Inversion

Sabbatean Frankism is a roll-up-your-sleeves topic of critical importance. I deliberately went to Robert Phoenix with this discussion as he offers considerable add-on value. At minute 00:32:00 of the podcast, he offered a very plausible […]

The post Russ Winter Rejoins Robert Phoenix to Discuss the Enormous Subject of Sabbatean Frankist Inversion first appeared on Winter Watch.

Full Moon In Aquarius: Rationality & Seriousness

We are having a Full Moon in Aquarius on July 23rd/24th. It will appear the brightest on the night of the 23rd throughout most of the world and on the night of the 24th in the time zones East of Japan. This is the peak of the Lunar cycle that began with a New Moon in Cancer on July 9th/10th.

The energies of a Full Moon are strongest in the days surrounding it yet its astrological configurations also play a part over the following two weeks. You may start to see its themes slowly build up after the New Moon prior.

This is a period in which we feel a push-pull between two opposing signs, in this case being the Moon in Aquarius and the Sun in Leo. It can play out as either a conflict, an integration, or some sort of dynamic between the energies of both signs. The Moon reflects the expression of feeling and emotion while the Sun reflects the expression of ego and conscious self.

We may feel this opposition happening individually within us and/or we can also experience it play out around us; with some people (or circumstances) expressing the Aquarius side and others expressing the Leo side. In some cases, Full Moons can also reflect/trigger some sort of change or release.

Full Moon In Aquarius Opposite Sun In Leo

Leo season began 36 hours before the Full Moon and will continue until August 22nd/23rd. This is the sign of self-expression, creativity, love, affection, children, courage, vitality, passion, leadership, generosity, and playfulness. Ruled by the Sun, it is also about shining in our power and being in alignment with what really lights us up and gets us excited.

The negative expressions of Leo can be egotistical, self-absorbed, authoritarian, dramatic, stubborn, jealous, and hot-tempered.  As it is associated with seeking praise and attention, it can be demanding of respect and be boisterous without considering or caring about how others respond to that.

The Full Moon highlights and brings the energies of the opposing sign of Aquarius into this Leo backdrop. This is the sign of friends, networks, social dynamics, social issues, groups, teams, humanity, and being in the best interest of the collective. This energy is unconventional, idealistic, innovative, progressive, scientific, original, inventive, technological, reforming, and even revolutionary.

Negatively, Aquarius can be overly detached, aloof, unemotional, and very invested in the mind at the expense of the heart. Traditionally ruled by Saturn, it can also be unyielding when it comes to the ideas and perspectives that it has already decided on.

Both Leo and Aquarius have some similarities. They are ‘Fixed’ signs and therefore can both be determined yet stubborn. They are also both associated with originality and authenticity. In Aquarius, this comes from its unconventional and innovative attributes while in Leo it comes from being inspired by its heart centred self-expression.

Full Moon Quincunx Venus, Conjunct Saturn, & Square Uranus

This Full Moon is in a quincunx with Venus which has recently entered Virgo. Our feelings, emotions, needs, or domestic lives may be at odds with friendships, values, finances, pleasure, or matters of love. It can be hard to integrate these areas but being flexible and making adjustments can be the solution.

The Full Moon is moving towards Saturn in the same sign. This can reflect a serious energy and we may be faced with limitations, restrictions, delays, or obstacles. We or others may be emotionally distant, pessimistic, or reserved. However, this can be good for some sort of effort that requires discipline, structure, and orderliness. After the Full Moon period, some of these energies will be strong again on August 1st/2nd.

Following the conjunction with Saturn, the Moon forms a square aspect with the disruptive Uranus in Taurus. This is activating the square between Saturn and Uranus that is happening throughout the year which I’ve covered in previous articles. Themes around ‘old versus new’, ‘restrictions versus freedom’, ‘the status quo versus revolution’, ‘commitments/responsibilities versus liberation’, ‘elder versus youth’, ‘progressiveness versus tradition’ and so forth.

Jupiter Going Back Into Aquarius

Jupiter entered its home sign of Pisces in mid-May for a short stint as it is returning back into Aquarius on July 28th/29th. The planet of expansion, freedom, beliefs, perspective, education, is unrestrained in Pisces and gets to express itself more ideally in this sign. We have seen examples of this as many jurisdictions loosened up covid related restrictions during this period.

With it going back into Aquarius, a traditionally Saturn ruled sign with Saturn currently present there, Jupiter will be more inhibited until late December when it re-enters Pisces again. It’s possible that during this 5 month period may experience more restrictive measures return or new ones implemented. We may also experience this in different ways in our personal lives such as not being able to expand the way we’d like to. However, this might not be noticeable immediately.

The combination of Saturn and Jupiter in Aquarius (which began last December) can be good for building towards something or planting seeds pertaining to some sort of technological integration, social networking, collective or social pursuits, activism, new scientific approaches to things, and innovation.

Venus Square Lunar Nodes, Mars Opposite Jupiter

Venus will be in a square with the Lunar Nodes which will be strong from July 28th-30th. We may be reflecting on the past and future, or perhaps at a crossroads, when it comes to friendships, love, values, or financial matters. We may need to complete something and address what is holding us back  to help us move on and take a step forward in an evolutionary way when it comes to these areas of life. Venus is in Virgo so therefore discernment, details, practicality, health, organization, or efficiency may be key.

At this time Mars will be switching from Leo to Virgo while in an opposition to Jupiter. We may begin to feel the need to apply ourselves in a way that is more productive, sustainable, healthy, and clean. However, we can overextend ourselves and take on more than we can handle. This can also play out as conflicts around beliefs, perspectives, opinions, or judgements.

Mercury’s Superior Conjunction

Mercury will be in its Superior Conjunction on August 1st/2nd which is in an important phase of Mercury’s cycle with the Sun. From this point onward we may have a better perception around certain things that were seeded or occurred in the previous two months which may also help our momentum forward. .

Circumstances and developments that happen at this time can help us gain more clarity or facilitate necessary realizations to help us make the right decisions and appropriate mental focus. During this conjunction, the Sun and Mercury will be opposing Saturn which can play out as hindrances or the need to be pragmatic as part of this process.

Things To Consider

How can you balance or integrate your personal passions with the needs of the collective? How can you resolve any conflicts between leadership and a team or group? Are you experiencing any challenges or conflict between your heart and intellect? What areas of your life do you need to be more orderly, structured, disciplined, or take more seriously? Is there anything that you need to separate from? How can you apply yourself in a more noble way?

These are just some examples of themes that could come up or ways to approach this period; however, there may be other variations of this energy playing out as well.  If you wish to do any sort of intentional release, it is best to do so after it begins to wane following the peak or during the two weeks afterwards when it is waning before the next New Moon. The exact peak of this Full Moon is at 2:37am Universal Time on July 24th, night of the 23rd. You can click here to see what that is in your time zone.

Follow me on INSTAGRAM, FACEBOOK, and YOUTUBE for more astrology-related content.

astrology, astrology readings, carmen di luccio

Gain astrological insight into what is going on in your life and have a better understanding of your individual potentials. Get a personalized astrology reading with Carmen (author of this article) specific to you based on your exact birth date, time, and location. Click here for more information or to order

Notice of Prior Established Default and Liability

 By Anna Von Reitz

This is Notice to the Bank of International Settlements, headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, it’s Trustees, Board Members, Settlors, Assigns, and Accounts: you have previously been given Due Process and Notice and have been addressed both directly and via Agents to Principals regarding the liabilities you have promoted and accepted.
It has come to our attention that you have once again changed the date for Basel III Compliance and that this is creating a worldwide banking panic which is unnecessary and which will predictably result in chaos, economic losses, and massive loss of life for no sane reason.
This is to remind you that you are already in cured Default and that continued mismanagement and malevolent behavior will only increase your overall liability and the liability of all your partners, subsidiaries, franchises and agents. We must also remind you that any further breach of trust is a breach of fiduciary duty, which carries a penalty of 800 X the damages which are already published and set at $1,000,000,000.00 per life lost or maimed.
You will return to the original agreed upon compliance date of January of 2023, or you will bear the additional fines, fees, and penalties, which will result in systemic liquidation of all member banks, plus civil and criminal prosecution in international courts.
This liability is pre-established, cured, and non-negotiable.
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
See this article and over 3200 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Shut Them Down — Info for Litigation Committees

 By Anna Von Reitz

I recently recommended that all of our State Assemblies set up a Litigation Subcommittee as part of their Jural Assembly functions.
There are many reasons why it’s worthwhile to do this as one of the first Subcommittees, but let’s briefly run through why I am recommending this particular action even before you may have your jury pool and other parts complete.
Here’s my reasoning — (1) Many people who join our Assemblies have been attacked by the vermin and are confused, scared, hurting, or plain enraged. They come to us for help, but they are already entangled in a battle with the skunks and don’t know what to do. (2) It’s the nature of the Beast to attack on all sides at once, seeking to devour the victims. So we have people hurting from all sorts of causes — IRS, foreclosures, CPS, and on and on. Every case is different, and it is impossible to cover all the causes with limited funding and personnel. (3) Once they come to our doors, these people feel relief, but if they don’t get the attention and help they seek to cure their “legal” problems up front, they go on and cause more problems. They start trying to commandeer the Assemblies to help them deal with their lawsuits, etc.
So here is what we do — we nip all attacks in the bud and we teach people how to do it and we come together to support each other in doing it — and we organize this response through our Litigation Subcommittees. This will be a rallying point for Americans who have been similarly afflicted, and for Americans who know that they need a firmer understanding of the laws and jurisdictions.
We can run our law education classes through the Litigation Committees at the same time we are assisting each other with current cases.
Now please read the “conversation” below using Florida as an example, and notice the pleasant, laid back, country-style tone that you need to establish with the Judge. Remember that the Judge is the Referee. You don’t attack the Referee. You prosecute the Prosecutor, instead.
The Prosecutor is the one who has to establish jurisdiction for the court and also prove his own standing to bring any claim before the court — and even though this example is far from exhaustive, it’s a good place for everyone to start.
At your first hearing, you say something like, “I am sorry, Judge _________ (whatever their name is). We all don’t seem to be communicating very well, and I am sorry about that. I am not trying to be misunderstood or hard to understand.
I object to what this man, the Prosecutor, is presuming about me and I accordingly wish for a hearing of the facts and evidence beginning with discovery of who this man, Mr. Prosecutor, is, and the capacity in which he is acting, because I understand this much — he has to prove the jurisdiction of the court over both subject matter and my person, and he has to prove his standing to bring any claim against me.
So can we just start over and establish the nature of the claim and the parties? Because I am challenging the prosecutor and his ability to invoke the jurisdiction of the court. (This is your counterclaim and denial of jurisdiction.)
I don’t believe that the prosecutor is acting as a Public Officer in any public office related to me and my activities, so I would like to see his license to practice law in this country — not a guild card, not a green card — an actual license issued by any level of my American Government. Mr. Prosecutor, do you have such a license enabling you to address me?
[He won’t have one.]
Well, if you don’t have a license, and you still claim to be acting in a Public Office related to me, do you have a bond and an Oath of Office, as required to be an American Public Official? If so, I’d like to see your Bond and Oath of Office. [He won’t have either.]
Now, I understand that you are working for the State of Florida, and I further understand that the State of Florida is an incorporated entity that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and that it has the Dunn and Bradstreet Number 004078374. [You can find these DUNS numbers in the Appendix of “You Know Something is Wrong When….An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”.]
So, Mr. Prosecutor, when you come to court representing an incorporated entity, you are required to have the corporation’s charter in your hand, and I would like to see it, please? And if you are not representing the State of Florida or are representing other entities or are representing multiple incorporated entities besides the State of Florida, I would like to examine those charter documents, too. [He won’t have anything to show.]
Okay, well, without any valid proof I or the court can see, you are claiming to represent the State of Florida. Mr. Prosecutor, and I need to see some proof of your relationship with the State of Florida and any other entities you are representing here as plaintiffs, so please produce proof that you have a contract with the plaintiffs allowing you to represent them? I need something that has the official State of Florida seal on it.
Now, if you are representing the State of Florida, I assume you have a Business License and a Personal Liability Bond to ensure your Performance— may I see those, please?
If we assume, and at this point, that’s assuming a lot, that you are enabled and entitled to represent the State of Florida, you are representing a franchise organization that is a federated state —- and that means that you need to have a Foreign Agents Registration on file. May I see proof of your registration as a Foreign Agent with respect to Florida and its people?
Ok, well, Mr. Prosecutor, we’re not doing so good here proving that you have the standing to invoke any court in Florida, but nonetheless, just to be on the safe side, I need to give you and the Clerk and the Judge and the Court fair notice of my Foreign Sovereign status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Many people wonder about the meaning of that Act, and you may be one of them, so I will just observe to you that it is Federal Law under the United States Code that requires me to tell you outright that I am a Foreign Sovereign with respect to you, because I am a Floridian and I live in Florida, which is a foreign jurisdiction with respect to the State of Florida, where you and this court reside.
Now, Mr. Prosecutor, do you have a wet, blue ink signature of mine and Witnesses that I signed it, and established a contract between myself and the State of Florida, that you are using as the basis of your complaint?
[He won’t have anything. If he refers to The Constitution of the State of Florida, you remind him, “But I, Mr. Prosecutor, live in Florida, not the State of Florida. Are you confused on that point?” If so, you tell him, “Well, the Florida where I live is three dimensional and has physical borders and rocks and trees and rivers. The State of Florida is what they call an incomplete state — it only exists on paper as an incorporated entity. The Constitution of the State of Florida has nothing to do with me. I haven’t signed it and haven’t even read it, because it’s a foreign service contract.]
Nobody actually lives in the State of Florida, which is part of the problem here. In order for me to have anything to do with the State of Florida, I’d have to be an elected official or officer or a dependent of the State of Florida corporation, and I am notably not any such person. I am a living, native Floridian, with no office of personhood or dependency related to the State of Florida, however styled.
So I am a bit perplexed, and wondering who or what you have mistaken me for? And why? Isn’t it apparent who I am? And what I am? Do I need to show you the record of my political status as a Floridian? Or otherwise prove to you my membership in The Florida Assembly? I have proof on the public record, I just wasn’t able to bring it with me today.
Mr. Prosecutor, I don’t feel that you have demonstrated any contract with me, nor any contract with the State of Florida enabling you to do or say much of anything in this courtroom. You shouldn’t be addressing me and making assumptions about me and my political status, and you shouldn’t be attempting to subject me to laws that don’t apply to me. I stand under the Public Law, not any private law, and I believe that I have made that abundantly clear today.
May I have your agreement that you have failed the good faith and competency tests and are not able to establish either subject matter or in personam jurisdiction for this court? [He will most likely stand silent.]
Judge______________, I think we’ve all heard enough. The evidence is what it isn’t— the Prosecutor has no standing to address me and has failed to establish the required jurisdictions for the court, so I believe that all consideration of his pleadings should be dismissed, and would ask you to deliver the same conclusions and set me free.
If the Judge has a brain in his head, he will lay down the gavel and dismiss the case on the spot.
Now, what else can you and your fellow Assembly Members do to ensure this good result — that is, that the bloodsuckers let loose and get back on their side of the fence?
Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net. Declare your political status as an American, record it, and join your State Assembly.
State Assemblies, form your Litigation Subcommittees under the authority of your Jural Assemblies.
The Living Law Firm has been banned from THEIR courts, and with good reason. They were taking it in the shorts too often and on too many subjects and they just couldn’t take it any more.
We are going to teach each and every one of you, all those who will study and make themselves approved, how to defend yourselves and stop these false claims where they start, how to remove corrupt and incompetent judges from their benches, and how to help each other to secure justice and enforce the public law of this country again.
It has to start somewhere, and no place better than here and now, in our State Assemblies, within our Jural Assembly Committees and our Litigation Subcommittees.
Let’s go. Get ready to polish your cross-examination skills.
See this article and over 3200 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Thoughts for Great Britain

 By Anna Von Reitz

Though people are used to thinking of “Great Britain” as a country, it’s really not. It is a lumpy Federation of countries — England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, to be precise, which operates under some mutually “donated” delegated powers granted to the British Monarch, otherwise known as Her Royal Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, who acts as their Public Trustee and Owner of all Lands in the Realm.
This is not that much different from the system that was imposed on the Americans — only that was a custodianship via the Commonwealth instead of a Territorial custodianship —- not a lot of difference, except as regards the amount of savagery allowed to the Territorial Raj in America, versus the more refined and diabolical savagery of the Municipal Raj in “Great Britain”. But I digress…. the real point here is that “Great Britain” and “The United States of America” occupy parallel positions in international jurisdiction, both are Federations of States—States which are by nature singular, unincorporated, and independent. Our States are Wisconsin, New York, Florida, etc. which are all fully formed nation-states in the same sense as England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.
In this way, Great Britain holds the land and sea international jurisdiction, while England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales hold the soil jurisdiction that overlays the international land jurisdiction belonging to Great Britain.
Thus, in the Bilateral “Blue Dot” Banking System, there are two banks, one International Trade Bank, and one Commercial Bank that is owned as a wholly-owned subsidiary by their International Trade Bank. This allows for the People of Great Britain to trade with whoever they like, or conduct commerce with whoever they need to.
Under these two international Banks and their corresponding Accounts, are national Accounts of the independent countries — international trade bank accounts for England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and commercial accounts for England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, too.
Next, there are County accounts established in the same way.
So, for example, someone living in County Clare, Ireland, will have an account in a Blue Dot Bilateral System Bank, and be able to receive a pre-paid Vendor Account to use to pay off (offset) all debts owed by the STRAWMAN attached to their Proper Name. For most of us that means certain large items like mortgages and automobiles and college loans and utility bills and property taxes will be paid off this way, using a pre-paid credit account. They will have access to traditional banking services as well as credit union services and investment services all under one roof.
They will also have access to educational classes to teach them how to best use and apply these services for their own benefit and the benefit of their communities, counties, countries, and international federations.
Both precious metals and other assets and credit reserves will be used to promote the health, safety, and welfare of all people in all countries, and as we do this, the “national debts” will all be gradually paid down.
This is the part that many people find to be a mind-bender.
Imagine that you have a traditional bookkeeping ledger with credits on one side and debts on the other.
What happens when the two columns are never offset or paid off, one against the other?
A humongous credit develops on one side of the ledger, while an equally humongous debt develops on the other.
When you and your actual country start applying the pre-paid national credit to the national debt, the national debt decreases.
There is no more excuse to claim that you are a debtor or that your government is in debt, when in fact you are owed 150 years-worth of national credit that simply hasn’t been applied, and no more excuse for the government “poor-mouthing” about the national debt, which by rights doesn’t actually exist.
There is also no more excuse for slush-funding the surplus of both assets and credit for the use of unscrupulous people and “public” organizations that keep those same persons in positions of political power.
All of this has now been exposed and thoroughly understood, and it is simply a matter of enforcing the actual Public Law and agreeing to reorganize. Certain Parties have opposed this “popular movement” which is actually nothing more than enforcement of the Public Law, because they fear that they will lose money and even more importantly, will lose control.
This is a very old argument — about 1500 years in the making — about mankind’s capacity for self-rule and self-discipline, and our ability to choose things that are right and good for ourselves, instead of getting lost in fantasy and illusion and drugs and other evils.
There are those who argue that what we need are good, solid, flat-footed, practical leaders to make all the decisions, some sort of “meritocracy”, and there are those who argue that the actual end of the misery is for mankind to learn on a one-by-one basis how to self-govern, and for all of us to recognize the fundamental illusion that “money” is.
Creating a meritocracy whose source of power and control is based upon the promotion of a fundamental lie, only leads to another cycle of abuse and corruption. So, I stand with those who stand with education and self-governance and rational thought, which will eventually end the delusions of money and make way for a better world.
Please join the effort.
See this article and over 3200 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Bankruptcy of The United States

Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:

“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner’s report that will lead to our demise.

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States?’

Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold or silver coins can be “money” in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or “currency.” Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no such promises, and are not “money.” A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not “money?’ The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, -gold and silver coin.

It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer have any “money.” Most Americans have not been paid any “money” for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are “bankrupt,” along with the rest of the country?

Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed account. FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). when ever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.

Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) – a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.

There is a fundamental difference between “paying” and “discharging” a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of “good & valuable consideration.” Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already.

Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations.

The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a “Canon Law Trust” as their model, adding stock and naming it a “Joint Stock Trust.” The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal “person” to duplicate a “Joint Stock Trust” in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3]

The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.

Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)

“Hypothecated” all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a “beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit “money substitute” it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their “economic slaves”, the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

 Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.

This has been going on for over eighty years without the “informed knowledge” of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it’s easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.

Why don’t more people own their properties outright?

Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?

We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.

America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order!

Wake up America! Take back your Country.”

Source: http://www.afn.org/~govern/index.html#Articles

Patents Prove SARS-CoV-2 Is a Manufactured Virus

In a January 2021 lecture, Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., introduced the term “the pandemic virus industrial complex,” to describe the academic, military and commercial complexes that are driving the pandemic agenda and obscuring facts that indicate SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus.

In the video above, David E. Martin, Ph.D., introduces shocking evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is indeed a manmade bioweapon, and has been in the works for decades. Much of this research was funded by none other than the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Pandemic virus industrial complex indeed! You do not want to miss this bombshell interview, conducted by Reiner Fuellmich,1 founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee2,3 (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss or ACU4). A transcript5 is available if you prefer to read it.

SARS-CoV-2 Is Not a Novel Coronavirus at All

Martin has been in the business of tracking patent applications and approvals since 1998. His company, M-Cam International Innovation Risk Management, is the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries. M-Cam has also monitored biological and chemical weapons treaty violations on behalf of the U.S. government, following the anthrax scare in September 2001.

According to Martin, there are more than 4,000 patents relating to the SARS coronavirus. His company has also done a comprehensive review of the financing of research involving the manipulation of coronaviruses that gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus family.

In his testimony to ACU, he reviews some of the most pertinent patents, showing SARS-CoV-2 is not a novel coronavirus at all but, rather, a manmade virus that has been in the works for decades.

A comprehensive list of 120 patents relating to SARS-CoV-2-associated features can be found here.6 The features patented are referenced in two key scientific papers, “A Novel Bat Coronavirus Reveals Natural Insertions at the S1/S2 2 Cleavage Site of the Spike Protein and a Possible Recombinant 3 Origin of HCoV-19,” and “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.”

On that list, we see numerous patents detailing manipulation of the polybasic cleavage site for SARS-CoV, the spike protein, as well as ACE2 binding, all three of which are supposed to be unique features of SARS-CoV-2. As explained by Martin:

“We took the reported gene sequence, which was reportedly isolated as a novel virus, indicated as such by the ICTV, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses of the World Health Organization. We took the actual genetic sequences that were reportedly novel and reviewed those against the patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020.

And what we found, as you’ll see in this report, are over 120 patented pieces of evidence, to suggest that the declaration of a ‘novel coronavirus’ was actually entirely a fallacy.

There was no novel coronavirus. There are countless, very subtle modifications of coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded, but there was no single identified ‘novel coronavirus’ at all.

As a matter of fact, we found records in the patent records, of sequences attributed to novelty, going to patents that were sought as early as 1999. So not only was this not a novel anything … it’s not been novel for over two decades.”

Spike Protein Vaccine for Coronavirus Patented 22 Years Ago

Up until 1999, coronavirus patents were all in the veterinary sciences. The first coronavirus vaccine to use the S spike protein was patented by Pfizer in January 2000 (Patent No. 6372224). It was a spike protein virus vaccine for canine coronavirus. You can look up the actual patents for yourself on the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s website,7 if you like.

“Ralph Baric’s work on … rabbit cardiomyopathy … and then canine coronavirus in Pfizer’s work, to identify how to develop S spike protein vaccine target candidates, [give] rise to the obvious evidence that …

… neither the coronavirus concept of a vaccine, nor the principle of the coronavirus itself, as a pathogen of interest with respect to the spike proteins behavior, is anything novel at all. As a matter of fact, it’s 22 years old based on patent filings,” Martin says.

From HIV Vaccine Development to COVID-19

According to Martin, Fauci and the NIAID “found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines,” and in 1999, Fauci funded research at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (where Baric has a lab) to create “an infectious replication-defective coronavirus” specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.

The patent for that replication-defective coronavirus that attacks human lung cells was filed April 19, 2002 (Patent No. 7279327). “In other words, we made SARS,” Martin says. Or perhaps more accurately, Fauci and UNC did. Several months after that patent filing, the SARS outbreak in Asia occurred.

“That patent, issued as U.S. Patent 7279327 … clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing, the fact that we knew that the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein, and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen, was not only engineered, but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies.

Taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen, or an intermediate of the pathogen, and that technology was funded exclusively, in the early days, as a means by which we could harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.”

Coronavirus — A Biological Weapon Candidate Since 2001?

As mentioned, Martin has monitored biological and chemical treaty violations since 2001, following the anthrax attacks. Throughout the fall of 2001, an “enormous number” of bacterial and viral pathogens were patented through the National Institutes of Health, the NIAID, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) and their international collaborators.

“Our concern was that coronavirus was being seen as not only a potential manipulatable agent for potential use as a vaccine vector, but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate,” Martin says.

Before the SARS outbreak in China, Martin reported these concerns publicly. “So, you can imagine how disappointed I am to be sitting here … having 20 years earlier pointed that there was a problem looming on the horizon with respect to coronavirus,” he says.

CDC Holds Patents on SARS Coronavirus

In April 2003, after the SARS outbreak in China had occurred, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tried to file a patent for the entire gene sequence for the SARS coronavirus (Patent No. 7220852). This is a violation of 35 U.S. Code Section 101, which states you cannot patent a naturally-occurring substance.

That CDC patent also had several derivative patents associated with it, including U.S. patent 46592703P and U.S. patent 7776521. These two patents cover the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus and the means for detecting it using RT PCR testing.

Together, these patents are highly problematic, because if you own both, then “you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection, meaning you have entire scientific and message control,” Martin explains.

The CDC tried to justify the patent by saying they were being sought in order to ensure that everyone would be free to research coronaviruses. However, that is a lie, Martin says. The U.S. patent office rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable because it was 99.9% identical to a coronavirus that was already in the public domain.

The CDC paid an appeal fine in 2006 and again in 2007. They also paid an additional fee to keep the application private. In the end, the CDC overrode the patent examiner’s rejection and secured the patent in 2007.

“Last time I checked, if you’re trying to make information available for the public research, you would not pay a fee to keep the information private,” Martin says. According to Martin, the gene sequence filed by the CDC in 2003, 2005 and 2006 is 89% to 99% identical to the sequence identified as SARS-CoV-2.

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals

April 28, 2003 — three days after the CDC filed its patent for the SARS coronavirus — Sequoia Pharmaceuticals filed a patent on an antiviral agent for the treatment and control of infectious coronavirus (Patent No. 7151163). So, the CDC files a patent on SARS coronavirus, and three days later there’s a treatment?

This strongly suggests there was a working relationship behind the scenes. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, founded in 2002, develops antiviral therapeutics with a special focus on drug-resistant viruses.8 Its lead investors include the Wellcome Trust.

But there’s yet another problem with Sequoia’s 2003 filing for an antiviral agent. It was actually issued and published before the CDC patent on SARS coronavirus had been granted, which didn’t happen until 2007, and the CDC had paid to keep the application private.

“So, the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero,” Martin says. “It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published, because CDC had paid to keep it secret.

This, my friends, is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion. This is not a theory, this is evidence. You cannot have information in the future, and form a treatment for a thing that did not exist. It is a RICO case …

And the RICO pattern, which was established in April of 2003 for the first coronavirus, was played out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS COV-2 show up, when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the vaccine research center at NIAID, prior to the definition of the novel subclade. How do you treat a thing, before you actually have the thing?”

Sanofi Holds Patents to Novel Feature of SARS-CoV-2

The next bombshell revelation occurred on June 5, 2008, when Ablynx, now a part of Sanofi, filed a series of patents detailing what we’ve been told are novel features of SARS-CoV-2, namely the polybasic cleavage site, the spike protein and the ACE2 receptor binding domain. The first of those patents, U.S. Patent No. 9193780, was issued November 24, 2015.

Between 2016 and 2019, a series of patents were issued to Ablynx and Sanofi covering the RNA strands and the subcomponents of the gene strands.

Between 2008 and 2017, a series of patents were also filed by a long list of players, including Crucell, Rubeus Therapeutics, Children’s Medical Corporation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in München, Protein Science Corporation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong and the Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai.

This series of patents detail ever single attribute that is supposed to be unique to SARS-CoV-2, according to the paper, “A Novel Bat Coronavirus Reveals Natural Insertions at the S1/S2 2 Cleavage Site of the Spike Protein and a Possible Recombinant 3 Origin of HCoV-19.”

This paper has routinely been used to identify the so-called novel coronavirus that is SARS-CoV-2. Yet there are 73 patents, issued between 2008 and 2019, that describe the very elements that are said to be unique to SARS-CoV-2. Patents have been filed for SARS-CoV-2’s polybasic cleavage site, the ACE2 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein.

“So, there was no ‘outbreak’ of SARS, because we had engineered all of the elements of that,” Martin says. And by 2016, when Baric published a paper warning that SARS coronavirus was “poised for human emergence,” the virus in question had already been patented for commercial exploitation 73 times!

The Pandemic Virus Industrial Complex Is Swimming in Profit

Baric is one of the few people who has profited significantly from this pandemic, which he appears to have been part of creating. Another is Fauci. The same drug companies that hold patents on not-so-novel SARS-CoV-2 features are also raking in profits from their COVID shots.

In 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance that funneled research dollars from the NIAID to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research, who has promoted the official narrative that SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin, stated:9

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

Sounds an awful lot like what we’re facing right now, doesn’t it? At the end of the day, this pandemic has primarily been about profit and the shifting of wealth, from the lower- and middle-classes to the already ultra-wealthy. This is a war on the public, waged using biological weapons and information warfare, with the ultimate goal of “resetting” life and commerce as we know it.

Intentional Weaponization of Spike Protein

Martin says:

“There wasn’t a lab leak. This was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people, to get them addicted to a pan-coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released, and every study that’s ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak, is a red herring.

[There are] 73 patents on everything clinically novel — 73, all issued before 2019. And I’m going to give you the biggest bombshell of all to prove that this was actually not a release of anything, because Patent No. 7279327, the patent on the recombinant nature of that ‘lung-targeting’ coronavirus, was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institutes of Health in 2018.

Now, here’s the problem with that. Under the Bayh-Dole Act, the U.S. government already has what’s called a march-in right provision. That means if the U.S. government has paid for research, they are entitled to benefit from that research at their demand or at their whim.

So, explain why, in 2017 and 2018, suddenly the National Institutes of Health have to take ownership of the patent that they already had rights to, held by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And how did they need to file a Certificate of Correction to make sure that it was legally enforceable, because there was a typographical error in the grant reference in the first filing?

They needed to make sure that not only did they get it right, but they needed to make sure every typographical error that was contained in the patent was correct on THE SINGLE PATENT REQUIRED, to develop the Vaccine Research Institute’s mandate, which was shared between the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and Moderna in November of 2019, when UNC Chapel Hill, NIAID and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine — a month before an outbreak ever happened.”

‘New Normal’ Coined by Merck at 2004 Bioterrorism Conference

The more we learn, the grimmer it gets. Clearly, plans for our current-day predicament were laid well over a decade ago. According to Martin, the slogan “The New Normal” was coined by Merck during a January 6, 2004, conference called “SARS and Bioterrorism, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Therapeutics, and Immune Modulators.”

This term has now become a branded campaign adopted by the World Health Organization, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and the rest of the pandemic virus industrial complex.

Incidentally, Fauci is on the board of directors of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, as is Dr. Chris Elias, president of the Global Development Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and George Fu Gao, Ph.D., director-general of the Chinese CDC and a Chinese communist party member.10

It’s a long interview, but it does not disappoint. I urge you to take the time to listen to it, as Martin really lays out the timeline of when and how this pandemic virus came to be. He’s also published a 205-page paper11 detailing Fauci’s involvement that you can download from archive.org.

It now seems clearer than ever that everything we’re experiencing was planned and executed with a profit motive in mind. Armed with this new knowledge, I urge you once again to reclaim your life, your freedom and independence, and resist this manufactured notion of a “new normal.” A new normal will surely be established if we persist, but it will be the converse of what the pandemic virus industrial complex is hoping for.

We will resurrect medicine and science from the induced coma these fields are currently in, and usher in a new era of medical freedom, personal liberty, responsible and transparent government, fiscal stability and health care that actually promotes health rather than slow death. It may take a while, but together, we can do it. To get there, keep sharing information such as that provided by Martin in this mind-blowing interview in any way you can. In the end, truth will prevail. Believe it.