Disney Documentary Glorifies Fauci’s Façade

Disney+ is the streaming home of National Geographic, which released a documentary on Dr. Anthony Fauci, whom they describe as “one of our most vital public servants, whose work saved millions while he faced threats from anonymous adversaries.”1

The film paints Fauci as a hero, describing how he has “valiantly overseen the U.S. response to 50 years’ worth of epidemics, including HIV/AIDS, SARS and Ebola.”2 The media has also elevated Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), to the point of near deity status, giving him the nickname “America’s doctor.”3

As Saagar Enjeti notes in the Breaking Points video above,4 there are now children’s books written about this man, and people have put signs out in their yards thanking him for his service during the pandemic. But what about his penchant for lying about the fact that he greenlighted grant money that was sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which may have contributed to the pandemic?

Fauci’s COVID Lies Began at National Geographic

It’s curious that National Geographic has created this film, considering that National Geographic is the place where Fauci told one of his most pernicious lies in May 2020 — that there is no scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab. National Geographic reported May 4, 2020:5

“‘If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated … Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species,’ Fauci says.

Based on the scientific evidence, he also doesn’t entertain an alternate theory — that someone found the coronavirus in the wild, brought it to a lab, and then it accidentally escaped.”

Fauci’s insistence that the virus was of natural origin was instrumental in furthering the pandemic propaganda. It not only was headline news but became the basis for removing people from social media and censoring those who suggested that COVID-19 may have resulted from a manmade virus.

Meanwhile, Fauci had knowledge well before May 2020 that some experts were suspicious about the virus’ origin. He pushed the natural origin theory anyway, despite the evidence of engineering.

January 2020 Email to Fauci Warns of ‘Unusual’ Virus Features

While National Geographic is busy trying to further bolster Fauci’s reputation, they — and most other media outlets — are ignoring disturbing facts showing that Fauci knows much more about SARS-CoV-2’s manmade potential than he is letting on. Just how deep his involvement and knowledge runs has yet to be determined.

One of the first major pieces of propaganda is “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,”6 a paper published in Nature Medicine in March 2020 that became the preeminent “proof” that SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin and couldn’t possibly have come from a lab.

Fauci, along with Wellcome Trust head Jeremey Farrar and Dr. Francis Collins, NIH director, had a hand in the paper, as one of its authors wrote a March 6, 2020 email to the trio and colleagues, thanking them for their “advice and leadership.”7

Prior to this virologist Kristian Andersen — one of the authors of the Proximal paper — emailed Fauci January 31, 2020, cc’ing Farrar, stating, “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”8

The next day, February 1, 2020, a conference call was organized by Fauci and Farrar “to address several aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 genome that pointed towards an artificial origin, by means of generating adaptive changes through passaging and/or direct manipulation of the genome.”9

Fauci hasn’t acted alone, but he’s been one of the most prominent faces behind what could amount to one of the greatest lies of all time. Yet, his expertise has been held as indisputable by mainstream media since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to be elevated by propaganda pieces like National Geographic’s documentary.

Fauci as the Incarnate of Science Itself

Fauci has spread the notion that he is untouchable, going so far as to tell MSNBC that an attack on him is an attack on science:10

“It’s very dangerous … because a lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science, because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science.”

Throughout the pandemic, “trusting the science” has become a cultural statement and propaganda tool — far from what true science is all about. The pandemic response has largely eroded public trust in science, and rather than acting to protect public health, as his duty required, Fauci sprang to action to protect himself.

Charles Rixey, a COVID-19 analyst who combed through 100,000 pages of FOIA documents and reviewed more than 1,000 research articles, believes this erosion of trust came at the hands of Fauci, writing on Prometheus Shrugged:11

“Fauci quietly but directly ensured that scientific censorship was implemented, in large measure, to prevent public awareness of the extent of his role in GOF [gain-of-function] research and the controversies surrounding it. The evidence proves that, at the start of the pandemic, Dr. Fauci and many leading scientists moved to protect themselves — not us, who weren’t yet aware of the potential calamity at our doorstep.

Fauci LED the efforts to obstruct research into COVID’s origins, colluding with the President’s Science Advisor Kelvin Droegemeier and Wellcome Trust head Jeremy Farrar, to proactively undermine consideration of the evidence that directly tied their global research initiatives to the lab at the center of the COVID-19 pandemic.

To date, all of their efforts have been focused on preventing disclosure of embarrassing connections — not preventing another novel pathogen from sparking a global pandemic; to prevent future scrutiny, not future tragedy.”

The Government Is Held Hostage by Fauci

Fauci’s opinions are held so highly by the public that if the government were to go against his statements, backlash would ensue. This enables him to use his platform to push questionable COVID-19 policies.

“He’s a human being, not a God, and he’s never been elected for anything … The more he’s turned into a living god, the more all of our institutions will be held hostage by him,” Enjeti said.12 A prime example took place October 4, 2021, when Fauci said it was “too soon” to tell whether Americans could safely celebrate Christmas together.

He told CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” “It is just too soon to tell. We have to concentrate on continuing to get those numbers down and not try to jump ahead by weeks or months and say what we’re going to do at a particular time.”13

The statements, which were not backed by any science, were blasted on social media, with Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., stating, “No one elected Fauci to be Christmas Czar,” and Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., adding, “Fauci has lost all credibility with the American people. We aren’t waiting on his permission to celebrate Christmas together.”14

National Geographic Is Rewarding Fauci’s Lies

By elevating Fauci to hero status in their documentary, National Geographic is supporting the suppression of science and promoting the lies. As Enjeti said:15

“… Nat Geo is doing a documentary hailing Dr. Fauci after he literally lied on their platform. They are rewarding him, with effectively billions of dollars in free representational defense, but what’s even worse than that — what’s worse — is that they are actually proving one of Fauci’s most infamous moments, in which he declared that an attack on Fauci is an attack on science itself.”

The documentary will only further Fauci’s power, burying the reality that he’s lied to the American people. Richard Ebright, board of governors professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University and laboratory director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology, said that additional documents released by a FOIA lawsuit show without doubt that grants from the NIH were used to fund GOF research at WIV, and that Fauci lied about it:16

“The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement in Wuhan are untruthful.”

The more the suppression of science is celebrated and promoted, the further we get from actually learning the truth. Enjeti said:17

“Fauci’s status as a hero has precluded many honest conversations in media around what is acceptable pandemic response. And the more he is venerated, celebrated, the more power he yields within the government — that is bad for science.

It is actually bad for anyone who is actually looking for answers as to the question of what exactly went down in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. What role did Dr. Anthony Fauci play? What role did the National Institutes of Health play?”

Fauci’s Increasingly Encroaching on Your Personal Liberties

If Fauci is allowed further control over the pandemic response, your personal liberties will likely continue to be eroded. When asked whether he would support vaccine mandates for airline travel, Fauci told theSkimm, “I would support that if you want to get on a plane and travel with other people that you should be vaccinated.”18

He also stated, in an interview with Meet the Press, that “nothing has been taken off the table” when it comes to domestic air travel vaccine mandates.19

Despite Fauci’s many inconsistencies and outright lies during the pandemic — such as denying that the NIAID funded coronavirus research WIV20 — he still hasn’t been arrested and he still has a job, former Texas Congressman Ron Paul noted in his September 20, 2021 Liberty Report.21

“You’d think that his flip-flopping would call attention to his ineptness,” Paul said, adding that Fauci is partners with Bill Gates and the deep state is clearly on his side. If he stays in power, and his reputation continues to be bolstered by propaganda like National Geographic’s documentary, you can expect more of the same:22

“Fauci changes his mind every once in a while, only in words, never in actions. His actions have been very consistent. More government, more intimidation, more of elimination of personal liberties and personal decisions. So that’s going to continue. I don’t see how it could be improved unless they have somebody replace him. Some day that will happen.”

Dr. Robert Malone: International COVID Summit

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology, was among the respected doctors, lawyers and other professionals who spoke at the International COVID Summit in Rome, September 12 to 14, 2021.

The cross-border initiative aimed to provide a safe space and platform for the exchange of information and sharing of experiences, research and studies to further the care of COVID-19 patients worldwide.

It’s become abundantly clear that the injections aren’t the panacea to end the pandemic that they’ve been purported to be, and Malone spoke with TrialSite News to help spread the truth about the jabs’ inefficacies and risks, government conflicts of interest that are putting public health at risk and more.1

The FDA and CDC Are ‘Beyond the Law’

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biologic Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voted September 17, 2021, to authorize a third booster of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID shot Comirnaty for people over the age of 65 and other high-risk individuals.

Keep in mind that the shot you actually receive is still the Pfizer shot that is under extended emergency use authorization (EUA) — not the fully approved Comirnaty. While the two are deemed interchangeable, they are not identical from a legal standpoint. Comirnaty does not have EUA liability shielding, whereas the EUA Pfizer shot does.

While the VRBPAC voted to approve a booster for high-risk individuals and those over 65, the CDC’s expert advisory committee did not. The CDC advisory committee actually voted against recommending a booster for high-risk individuals based on their profession or living conditions, stating that only those over the age of 65 should be eligible for a booster at this time.

CDC director Rochelle Walensky, however, decided not to listen to her own experts. September 24, 2021, she simply overruled the CDC’s expert panel and went ahead with the recommendation to issue a booster dose for adults at high risk of infection due to profession or living conditions. This is only the second time in the CDC’s history that its own ACIP advisory panel has been overruled.2

“The FDA and the CDC are increasingly beyond the law. They don’t feel the need to comply in any way, even lip service really, with policies, procedures, legal requirements … or anything else. They pretty much are comfortable just doing whatever it is that they want to do,” Malone said.3 “I disagree that this is good policy at multiple levels. It’s not good science.”4

The Smoking Gun of Gain of Function Research

Malone touches briefly on the origin of SARS-CoV-2, which he says appears to have come from a lab:5

“The information linking the genetic characterization of the parent virus to what strongly appears to be a genetically engineered strain … this is all a smoking gun for gain of function research …

It’s increasingly difficult to come to any conclusion other than this originated in a laboratory, and it originated in a laboratory that was funded by the NIH NIAID [National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] … and that it was research performed in the Wuhan lab in China.”

If you use this as a working hypothesis, that SARS-CoV-2 is a product of GOF research, a project that was a collaboration between the Wuhan lab and U.S. government, and somehow the virus got out, Malone notes, imagine being a senior official in the government, such as the director of the National Institutes of Health or NIAID.

“What would your response be?” he asked. “I would be overrun by guilt. I would be frantic. And if this were to be the case, this might explain the irrational behavior on the part of the government and the senior officials in the government.”6 Conflicts of interest are also problematic, such as the inherently conflicted nature of the CDC. CDC has a mission to promote vaccines and vaccine uptake, Malone said, but also vaccine safety.

These are in conflict, and the agency is focused on vaccine promotion, not careful evaluation of vaccination safety data. Going forward, he says, the CDC should be split into two parts, so that vaccine program promotion can be separate from their safety monitoring.

Vaccinated People Are the Superspreaders

The media and government officials continue to parrot the narrative that the pandemic is one of the unvaccinated, even as “breakthrough cases,” or vaccine failures, rise. As of October 12, 2021, the CDC stated that 31,895 people who were fully injected against COVID-19 were hospitalized or died from COVID-19.7

“The vaccines do not fully protect you from infection, virus replication and shedding … just because you’ve had the jab doesn’t mean you’re not going to infect anybody else,” Malone said. Further, Malone believes that by reducing symptoms of illness while allowing viral replication to continue, the injections increase the likelihood that vaccinated people will become super spreaders of COVID-19:8

“Here’s the wrinkle to this … a case can be made, because the vaccines are providing protection from serious illness, so in general, if you get infected with Delta and you’re vaccinated, you’ll have as much virus replication in your body as the unvaccinated person, but you’re not going to feel so sick.

What does that translate to? ‘Oh, I can just go to work,’ right? So if you think it through … the vaccinated are actually the ones that are creating the highest risk for everybody, because they’re still going to be able to be infected, replicate virus at least at the level, if not higher, than the unvaccinated. They’re still shedding the virus all over the place, but they feel good. And so they are, by definition, set up to be superspreaders.”

The Social Contract Has Been Destroyed

Malone believes that many people submitted to the shots because of an unspoken social contract. In an interview with The Epoch Times, he explained:9

“That social contract was, ‘Despite what you may have heard about the risks of some of these products and the fact that we admittedly did rush them, we’re protecting your health. If you take these products, you will be safe.’ That’s the social contract. ‘Despite all these other concerns, you will be safe, and you won’t have to retake them. You’ll be protected.’ People believed they had a shield if they bought in and did this.”

The idea was self-sacrifice for the common good. If you submit to the experimental shots, you would not only be personally protected, but you would also protect your community, and we could all recover and get back to a sense of normalcy. Except — people got the shots and normalcy hasn’t returned, people have been harmed by vaccine-induced adverse events and deaths and “normal” in the sense of the word prior to 2020 has not returned.

Malone predicts that as the shots’ effectiveness wanes, we’re going to see increasing cases of vaccinated people still getting COVID-19 and being hospitalized and dying as a result. He puts a new peak at around January or February 2022.

At that point and moving forward, he said, “people will have to come to terms with the fact that the vaccinated are still being hospitalized and dying.” “The social contract will be rendered a sundry. It will be destroyed … And then people are going to have to come to terms with the fact that they’ve been misled.”10

Action Items From the International COVID Summit

One of the action items Malone took home from the International COVID Summit is one I’ve been speaking of for years: Optimize your vitamin D levels. Malone said it’s “abundantly clear” that many people are deficient in vitamin D and can benefit from increasing their levels.

Data from GrassrootsHealth’s D*Action studies suggest the optimal level for health and disease prevention is between 60 ng/mL and 80 ng/mL, while the cutoff for sufficiency appears to be around 40 ng/mL. In Europe, the measurements you’re looking for are 150 to 200 nmol/L and 100 nmol/L respectively. He also wants people to know that you don’t have to be consumed by fear:11

“You’ve been given so much of a fear message. Just fear and fear and fear. And, frankly, that’s in the interest of Big Media. This is how they sell their product. You don’t have to be afraid …

For children, unless your children have major preexisting conditions the probability of them getting death or severe disease from this is a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent. It is tiny, and, frankly, particularly male children, getting damage from the vaccine is much higher than that. It’s still a fraction of a percent, but the ratio is not encouraging.”

He’s echoed the words of a growing number of doctors who are trying to get the word out about the importance of early treatment. If you have upper respiratory symptoms, first, don’t just assume it’s COVID-19. Get a test and if it’s positive, find a doctor who will give you early treatment “and the probability of you ending up in the hospital or dying is tiny.”

Malone is also part of the Global COVID Summit, which is an international alliance of doctors and scientists who are committed to speaking truth to power COVID pandemic research and treatment.12 They’re amassing a fully curated body of information geared toward medical professionals, but everyone can view their data online.

They believe that people are dying from COVID-19 due to being denied early, life-saving treatment and have created The Declaration to give physicians back their right to treat their patients and for patients to have the right to receive those treatments “without fear of interference, retribution or censorship by government, pharmacies, pharmaceutical corporations, and big tech.”13

As of October 14, 2021, more than 12,000 doctors and scientists had signed the declaration,14 and it’s still open for signature. Because Malone and others who have spoken out against COVID-19 propaganda are facing a hostile press that’s attacking their reputations and demeaning them, they’re fighting back the best way they can — by continuing to share the truth.

By providing people with real information, Malone says, “We’re determined that we’re going to break this wall of reinforcing the dominant narrative and whatever the government says.”15

Fully vaccinated air passenger dies mid-flight from “covid”

(Natural News) Another person who should have been protected because he got “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) like the government commanded him to is dead because of the shots. Pegasus Airlines crew members found the 51-year-old man dead in his seat after Flight 1043 from Istanbul, Turkey, landed in Hamburg, Germany, on October…

Ireland experiencing highest number of new covid infections in Europe despite also having highest percentage of adults “fully vaccinated”

(Natural News) At least 90 percent of Ireland’s adult population is now “fully vaccinated” against the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). Despite this, Ireland currently leads the pack in terms of new Chinese Virus infections. How can this be if the jabs supposedly work at stopping the spread? The answer is they don’t. If anything, the injections…

Global food prices spiral out of control as supply problems continue

(Natural News) The Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, natural disasters and wonky global weather patterns combined to wreak havoc on global supply chains. Food prices have since been soaring: up 40 percent in the 15 months ending in June 2021. Needless to say, this problem will hurt those at the bottom of the economic food chain…