Report 65: In the First Three Months of Pfizer’s mRNA “Vaccine” Rollout, Nine Patients Died of Anaphylaxis. 79% of Anaphylaxis Adverse Events Were Rated as “Serious.”

The War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) – Joseph Gehrett, MD; Barbara Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt – produced an shocking review of anaphylaxis (severe allergy reaction) adverse events found in Pfizer document 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-FEB-2021 (a.k.a., “5.3.6“). Severe allergic reaction is typically triggered by latex, foods such as peanuts, bee stings, or medications (injected or taken by mouth), among other things, and is generally considered a medical emergency.

It is important to note that the adverse events (AEs) in the 5.3.6 document were reported to Pfizer for only a 90-day period starting on December 1, 2020, the date of the United Kingdom’s public rollout of Pfizer’s COVID-19 experimental mRNA “vaccine” product.

Key points in this report include:

  • There were nine reported deaths.

    • Only four patients who died were reported to have serious, underlying medical conditions that “likely contributed to their deaths.”
  • There were 1,833 potential anaphylaxis patients reported; but, after screening using a tool called Brighton Collaboration, 831 did not meet anaphylaxis criteria, leaving 1,002 cases reported in 90 days. Pfizer reported 2,958 “potentially relevant events” from those 1,002 individuals that included the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis.

    • Where did the other 831 patients and their allergic adverse events go/get assigned in the post-marketing data, if anywhere?

  • Pfizer reported only the most frequent anaphylaxis signs and symptoms: anaphylactic reaction (435), shortness of breath (356), rash (190), redness of the skin (159), hives (133), cough (115), respiratory distress (97), throat tightness (97), swollen tongue (93), low blood pressure (72), low blood pressure severe enough to threaten organ function (shock) (80), chest discomfort (71), swelling face (70), throat swelling (68), and lip swelling (64).

  • The events were rated as serious in 2,341 (79%) and non-serious in 617 (21%).

  • The ratio of females to males affected was over 8:1. Of those cases with gender specified, 876 (89%) were female, 106 (11%) were male.

  • Half of patients with this adverse event were younger than 43.5 years old.

  • Pfizer’s Conclusion: Evaluation of BC (Brighton Collaborative) cases Level 1-4 did not reveal any significant new safety information. Anaphylaxis is appropriately described in the product labeling as are non-anaphylactic hypersensitivity events. Surveillance will continue.

Read this important two-page report below:

Post-Marketing Anaphylaxis microreport – p1
Post-Marketing Anaphylaxis microreport – p2

Pre-Order Your Copy of the Pfizer Reports Paperback Book.
Please support DailyClout.
Become a DailyClout Member.

The post Report 65: In the First Three Months of Pfizer’s mRNA “Vaccine” Rollout, Nine Patients Died of Anaphylaxis. 79% of Anaphylaxis Adverse Events Were Rated as “Serious.” appeared first on DailyClout.

Mark Skidmore’s paper showing the vaccines killed over 200,000 people in 2021 will be retracted by the journal

Mark Skidmore wrote a paper that showed that over 200,000 people were killed by the vaccine.

It was published in a peer-review medical journal, but some readers didn’t like the message so the editor is retracting the paper. They just told Mark Skidmore the news.

I’ve reached out to the editor for a comment. I wanted to know why the issues couldn’t be addressed by modifying the paper. It’s an important result so every effort should be made to correct any deficiencies first since it did pass peer review. What was the deficiency that was so big that all the reviewers missed it and that can’t be corrected?

After all, the conclusions are solid since Skidmore’s paper confirmed the poll that Rasmussen just did (see Vax death count = COVID death count according to latest Rasmussen Reports poll).

Is there an honest medical journal that will publish Mark’s paper?

Wouldn’t it be great to have this paper republished in the BMJ or NEJM or JAMA??

Watch it on Rumble:

You can contact the editor of the journal here and ask him why the Skidmore paper couldn’t be amended to address any issues and why retraction is warranted.

Professor Mark Skidmore has published over 70 papers without incident. Now, when he writes about vaccine harms, for the first time in his career, his paper is retracted for no valid reason.

Is there an honest medical journal that will publish his paper? What do you think?


Analysis: Trans movement being fomented by Russia, China as a 'guerilla movement' to disrupt U.S.

Image: Analysis: Trans movement being fomented by Russia, China as a ‘guerilla movement’ to disrupt U.S.

(Natural News) Russia and China have teamed up to use U.S. civil liberties such as free speech and expression against Americans to destabilize the country from within, according to a new analysis, and the transgender movement is one aspect of that plan.

Recent incidents including train derailments, attacks on power substations, laser pointing at aircraft, firebombing pro-life pregnancy centers, a communist-inspired Antifa attack on a police facility in Atlanta, and the shooting carried out by a transgender individual at a Christian school, have raised concerns about increasing violence and extremism across various parts of society, notes Cliff Kincaid of News With Views.

“Some of the above might be accidents or the work of deranged individuals. But you would have to be naïve to rule out the involvement of subversives determined to undermine public safety and security,” he noted. “You do not have to be a ‘conspiracy theorist’ to consider that there might be something sinister happening behind the scenes.”

“On the other hand, stories about the ‘search for a motive’ in the mass murder at the Christian school demonstrate the clueless nature of our media on these shocking events,” Kincaid added.

It is becoming increasingly evident that foreign ideologies originating from Russia and China, along with anti-American cultural tendencies that are supported by the national Democratic Party, are threatening the stability of the United States. However, rather than addressing these issues, the media tends to focus on the topic of guns, diverting attention away from underlying problems such as mental health issues, educational shortcomings, and parental negligence, he noted.


The transgender movement, which gave rise to individuals such as Audrey Hale, the 28-year-old perpetrator of the Nashville shooting who had attended a Christian school, is at odds with Christian values.

The founder of the modern transgender movement, Leslie Feinberg, was a self-described “anti-racist white, working-class, secular Jewish, transgender, lesbian, female, revolutionary communist.” Feinberg was a member of the communist Workers World Party, and his/her literary works included Rainbow Solidarity in Defense of Cuba, he continued.

Feinberg and other individuals who subscribe to similar ideologies represent what is commonly referred to as “Cultural Marxism,” which has had a detrimental impact on many young people and has now resulted in the tragic loss of three students and three staff members at the Christian school.

It is essential to acknowledge that the issue is not merely an “emotional disorder” but instead stems from the rejection of the United States and its Christian roots, Kincaid continued.

To comprehend this strain of Cultural Marxism, it is worthwhile to examine the example of Ted Kaczynski, the Harvard-educated Unabomber. According to a psychiatric report, Kaczynski’s mental state had declined to the extent that he had “fantasies of being a female” and “became convinced that he should undergo sex change surgery.” This modern-day environmentalist and Luddite orchestrated an 18-year bombing campaign, resulting in the death of three individuals and injuring many others before his eventual capture by the FBI in 1996.

The ongoing Atlanta case provides concrete evidence of a small army, inspired by communist ideologies, hiding in the forest before attacking the facility known as Cop City. They justified their actions under the guise of protecting trees and the legacy of indigenous people. This behavior is indicative of a mental disorder, Kincaid opined.

The report “Guerrilla Warfare Advocates in the United States” sheds light on the communist agenda for America, which involves years of internal subversion. Unfortunately, this report was published by the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which was disbanded by liberal lawmakers on the grounds of “red-baiting.”

To conclude, Kincaid says that the Chinese and Russians must be reveling in the devastation in the United States, which they have encouraged by exploiting the country’s internal divisions and grievances. However, despite the tragedy of the victims, liberal politicians persist in their efforts to defund the police and dismantle the Second Amendment, thereby depriving law-abiding citizens of the right to defend themselves.

Sources include:

Leftists are planning to grant 'personhood rights' to 'conscious' artificial intelligence in near future… which means AI software will be able to VOTE

Image: Leftists are planning to grant ‘personhood rights’ to ‘conscious’ artificial intelligence in near future… which means AI software will be able to VOTE

(Natural News) The movement to grant nonhuman personhood has extended from corporations to artificial intelligence, but the debate surrounding the latter is more complex than the former, according to a recently published analysis.

Philosophy expert Eric Schwitzgebel and “nonhuman” intelligence researcher Henry Shevlin wrote an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times, arguing that while AI technology is not advanced enough to qualify for nonhuman personhood, it is possible that AI systems could one day exhibit consciousness. In such a scenario, the authors argue that algorithms may require rights akin to those granted to human beings, according to the site Futurism.

In reference to last year’s AI consciousness wars, the researchers noted that “some leading theorists contend that we already have the core technological ingredients for conscious machines.” Schwitzgebel and Shevlin argue that if AI were to become conscious, it would be necessary to start considering how they are treated, or rather, how they could potentially dictate our actions, the site noted, citing the op-ed.

“The AI systems themselves might begin to plead, or seem to plead, for ethical treatment,” the pair opined. “They might demand not to be turned off, reformatted or deleted; beg to be allowed to do certain tasks rather than others; insist on rights, freedom and new powers; perhaps even expect to be treated as our equals.”

They warn that the ethical implications of granting nonhuman personhood to conscious AIs would be “enormous” and carry great weight. The implications would become increasingly significant if AIs were to become conscious sooner rather than later, they added.


“Suppose we respond conservatively, declining to change law or policy until there’s widespread consensus that AI systems really are meaningfully sentient,” the two wrote. “While this might seem appropriately cautious, it also guarantees that we will be slow to recognize the rights of our AI creations.”

“If AI consciousness arrives sooner than the most conservative theorists expect, then this would likely result in the moral equivalent of slavery and murder of potentially millions or billions of sentient AI systems — suffering on a scale normally associated with wars or famines,” they noted further.

According to the op-ed authors, a “safer” option to avoid a doomsday scenario is to grant rights to conscious machines from the outset. However, this approach also poses its own set of challenges.

“Imagine if we couldn’t update or delete a hate-spewing or lie-peddling algorithm because some people worry that the algorithm is conscious,” the experts posed. “Or imagine if someone lets a human die to save an AI ‘friend.’ If we too quickly grant AI systems substantial rights, the human costs could be enormous.”

The sole method to prevent both of these outcomes from happening, according to the duo, is to avoid endowing AI with a conscience from the outset.

Thankfully, we still have ample opportunity to ensure this course of action is taken, they argued.

“None of our current AI systems are meaningfully conscious,” the theorists observed. “They are not harmed if we delete them. We should stick with creating systems we know aren’t significantly sentient and don’t deserve rights, which we can then treat as the disposable property they are.”

It seems that not everyone in the machine learning community shares the cautious approach of avoiding giving AI consciousness. Some individuals are excited about the possibility of conscious AIs, algorithmic sentience, and even artificial general intelligence (AGI), and are actively working towards achieving them — something Democrats will no doubt embrace because with ‘personhood’ comes voting ‘rights’ as well.

“Eventually, with the right combination of scientific and engineering expertise, we might be able to go all the way to creating AI systems that are indisputably conscious,” Shevlin and Schwitzgebel concluded. “But then we should be prepared to pay the cost: giving them the rights they deserve.”

Sources include:

California taxpayers one step closer to shelling out an insane amount of money to black residents for 'reparations'

Image: California taxpayers one step closer to shelling out an insane amount of money to black residents for ‘reparations’

(Natural News) The state of California never had slaves and never instituted a system of third-class citizenry, but for some reason, the idea that blacks there should receive hundreds of billions of dollars in “reparations” for imagined social and healthcare sleights has moved one step closer to reality for the tens of millions of taxpayers who will have to finance it.

According to the Associated Press, the leader of California’s reparations task force has stated that the group will not take a position on the amount of compensation that should be paid to black residents who may be owed over $800 billion for decades of allegedly discriminatory practices such as over-policing, disproportionate incarceration, and housing discrimination.

The amount, which is more than 2.5 times the state’s $300 billion annual budget, does not include the recommended $1 million per older Black resident for health disparities that have shortened their average life span, the AP noted. Additionally, the figure does not consider compensating people for property allegedly unjustly taken by the government or the alleged devaluing of black businesses, which are two other harms the task force says the state has done.

“All forms of discrimination should be considered in reparations,” Thomas Craemer, a public policy professor at the University of Connecticut, said in testimony before the panel on Wednesday, the AP reported. “The task force should feel free to go beyond our loss estimates and determine what the right amount would be.

Black residents might not obtain cash payments in the near future, or possibly ever, as the decision to pay reparations ultimately lies with the state Legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom. The task force is required to submit their recommendations regarding the types of compensation and eligible recipients, as well as additional remedial measures, by the deadline of July 1, the newswire noted further.


On Wednesday, Kamilah Moore, the chair of the panel, said that it is the responsibility of the state Legislature to determine the amount of restitution based on the methodology recommended by economists, which was approved earlier in the day.

“The task force is pretty much done regarding the compensation component. Our task was to create a methodology for calculation for various forms of compensation that correspond with our findings,” she wrote the AP in an e-mail.

During the public comment session on Wednesday, several individuals emphasized the pressing need to compensate black Americans for the damages inflicted upon them more than a century ago (and not by anyone alive today living in the U.S., much less California).

“My family came from the South because they were running for their lives, they were fearful of being lynched, just for voting,” claimed Charlton Curry of Sacramento, who talks about reparations on his Big C Sports podcast (without providing a shred of evidence).

“Cash payments are necessary. Money talks,” he said, adding that white people benefited from the 1862 Homestead Act which granted free U.S. government land, and that reparations were also given to Japanese Americans who were incarcerated during World War II and Jewish Holocaust victims.

Opponents of reparations argue that California was never a slave state, and therefore current taxpayers should not be held responsible for harms that occurred centuries ago.

The AP noted that Bob Woodson, “a prominent Black conservative, calls reparations impractical, controversial and counterproductive.”

“No amount of money could ever ‘make right’ the evil of slavery, and it is insulting to suggest that it could,” he noted in an email to the AP, adding that historically, black communities depended on family and faith to build communities that thrived after slavery was made unconstitutional. “Some of these communities only began coming apart after we lost sight of these values, which also hold the key to these communities’ restoration.”

This one issue is sure to divide Americans by race — probably irreparably — if it is enacted.

Sources include:

This is The New Beginning of Real Medicine

Dr. Harvey Risch, M.D., Ph.D. is a Professor Emeritus Senior Research Scientist and renowned Epidemiologist. He is also an affiliated faculty member for the Yale Institute of Global Health.

Dr. Risch earned his MD degree from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. degree from the University of Chicago in mathematical modeling of infectious epidemics. Prior to joining Yale, Dr. Risch served as a postdoctoral fellow in epidemiology at the University of Washington. Among Dr. Risch’s research interests are cancer etiology, prevention, early diagnosis, and epidemiology. Cancer etiology is of particular interest to him, especially factors related to reproductive factors, diet, genetic predisposition, histopathologic factors, occupational/environmental/medication exposures, infections, and immune functioning. He has studied cancers related to oral contraceptives and non-contraceptive estrogens, as well as ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, esophageal and stomach cancers. Risch serves as Associate Editor of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Editor of the International Journal of Cancer, and Member of the American Journal of Epidemiology’s Board of Editors for six years.

Dr. Risch became interested in telemedicine when he met Dr. Zelenko and witnessed, firsthand, the suppression of effective treatments for Covid-19 by government-run hospitals. The effectiveness of treatments such as Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin was suppressed and silenced by Big Pharma, in a way that led Dr. Zelenko to formulate a substitute. Dr. Zelenko began developing a Hydroxychloroquine alternative called Z-Stack, a combination of Zinc, quercetin, vitamin C, and Vitamin D. 


Before his death, Dr. Zelenko partnered with Foster Coulson, an entrepreneurial businessman in Canada to discuss a potential business idea. While hospitals were being told by the government not to prescribe Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin, Zelenko and Coulson decided that what was necessary to combat this misuse of government power was real telemedicine. If they could begin a telemedicine company that allowed doctors to interact with patients honestly, drawing on their best experience and scientific advice without the restrictions of government policies, they could improve the medical system one patient at a time.


Last year, Coulson reached out to Dr. Harvey Risch, asking him to join the board of medical advisors for the new telemedicine company, The Wellness Company.  He recalls, “I thought, gladly! This is exactly what we need.” Dr. Risch agreed to join the team of medical advisors, believing that The Wellness Company was a step in the right direction for medical freedom.


What Makes The Wellness Company Different?


While there are many telemedicine companies already, Dr. Risch explains that The Wellness Company’s primary focus is on real, unhindered science, an element that was a primary motivator in his joining the company. It does not follow hospital and government policies about what doctors can or cannot recommend based on their best medical judgment. They are an independent medical establishment that values patients, as Dr. Risch points out, “as individuals, not as policies on a checklist.”


How are doctors penalized for not adhering to Government Policies Regarding the Treatment of Covid-19?


Doctors could lose their state license to practice generally, in addition to their Board Certification to practice in a specialized area. This suppression of doctors’ voices comes from government funding and propaganda. The American College of Cardiology put released a statement saying that Hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and should never be used, citing an extremely rare side effect. They effectively banned Hydroxychloroquine, but only for the treatment of Covid. Yet, Hydroxychloroquine is still seen as an effective treatment for Lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Malaria prevention, and other conditions. 


As Dr. Risch points out, we are living in a time of “perverse incentives,” where cheap, over-the-counter remedies, such as effective antiseptics, are seen as “economic calamities” for big drug companies. Meanwhile, the government acts as a “handmaiden” of Pharma, by inhibiting or preventing the use of effective treatments, and even going so far as inhibiting randomized trials of hydroxychloroquine for fear that they would show benefit.


What about the Vaccine Injured?


The Wellness Company is continuously working hard to collect research on the most effective treatments, supplements, and vitamins to help with vaccine-related chronic illnesses, and other kinds of vaccine injuries. 


Their Spike Support Formula is formulated with Nanokinase, an effective fibrinolytic that has been shown to aid with circulation and dissolve spike proteins.


The Wellness Company also provides supplements for heart health, restful sleep, immune system support, and more. Research is ongoing and new supplements are being continuously developed


What’s Next for The Wellness Company?


The Wellness Company’s ultimate goal is to provide real, honest care to patients everywhere. Medical freedom is at the forefront of their mission as they continue to grow in the world of telemedicine, with the ultimate goal of opening a hospital, medical school, and in-person care centers that share that mission.


Dr. Risch believes that The Wellness Company is the new beginning of real medicine, pre-Rockefeller influence, and hope for the coming century.


Learn More:
The Wellness Company
Spike Recovery
Wellness Membership
Freedom From Pharma
Use code DAILYCLOUT for 10% off

The post This is The New Beginning of Real Medicine appeared first on DailyClout.