Dispelling The Mainstream Narrative
Jan 23 • 1HR 25M
Listen to Dr. Mercola’s Weekly Podcast, as the legendary natural health pioneer continues to lead you on your journey towards optimal health.
Subscribe to Dr. Mercola’s Censored Library (Private Membership) to listen to this episode and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
I’m back with all new podcasts.
Subscribe and listen. Throw in a few bucks and support my work. It’s only $60 a year, the price of one breakfast off the highway and a few gallons of Biden gas. And, becoming a yearly subscriber, specifically, unlocks extra benefits; to learn more about that, click here.
This is a jumbo podcast, covering a number of key issues and the solutions that are being pushed. The solutions have merit in theory, but THE WAY THEY’RE BEING FRAMED makes them into limited hangouts:
A small corner of truth is thrust into the foreground to pacify and satisfy the public AND the “alt. community.”
Meanwhile, the biggest crimes are downgraded and minimized—meaning we’re still vulnerable. And nothing is really learned.
Not only that, major predators are still free to roam the world and enact their vicious and destructive operations, including mass medical murder.
I take a hard look, in depth, at how the “spear of the resistance” against tyranny is being pointed in the wrong direction.
I describe what a REAL Nuremberg 2.0 trial would look like. In practical terms.
I also discuss the political futures of Governor Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump. What are DeSantis’ best moves? What should happen to Trump?
What can we really expect from the Republicans who now control the House by a narrow margin? Will we just be treated to political theater?
Finally, I’ll dig into “Operation Paperclip 2.0,” the cluster of actual plans to move us into technological slavery—miles beyond any concern about new “pandemics.” In other words, the true intentions of the scientific global elite.
I’m bringing 35 years of experience investigating and writing about deep politics. I’ll talk about WHAT’S REALLY POSSIBLE, in terms of change in the structure of this rabid “democracy.”
Let’s not be fooled, AGAIN.
Join me in this all-important podcast.
Thank you for your support.
— Jon Rappoport
I’m back with all new podcasts.
Subscribe and listen. Throw in a few bucks and support my work. It’s only $60 a year, the price of one breakfast off the highway and a few gallons of Biden gas. And, becoming a yearly subscriber, specifically, unlocks extra benefits; to learn more about that, click here.
This is a jumbo podcast, covering a number of key issues and the solutions that are being pushed. The solutions have merit in theory, but THE WAY THEY’RE BEING FRAMED makes them into limited hangouts:
A small corner of truth is thrust into the foreground to pacify and satisfy the public AND the “alt. community.”
Meanwhile, the biggest crimes are downgraded and minimized—meaning we’re still vulnerable. And nothing is really learned.
Not only that, major predators are still free to roam the world and enact their vicious and destructive operations, including mass medical murder.
I take a hard look, in depth, at how the “spear of the resistance” against tyranny is being pointed in the wrong direction.
I describe what a REAL Nuremberg 2.0 trial would look like. In practical terms.
I also discuss the political futures of Governor Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump. What are DeSantis’ best moves? What should happen to Trump?
What can we really expect from the Republicans who now control the House by a narrow margin? Will we just be treated to political theater?
Finally, I’ll dig into “Operation Paperclip 2.0,” the cluster of actual plans to move us into technological slavery—miles beyond any concern about new “pandemics.” In other words, the true intentions of the scientific global elite.
I’m bringing 35 years of experience investigating and writing about deep politics. I’ll talk about WHAT’S REALLY POSSIBLE, in terms of change in the structure of this rabid “democracy.”
Let’s not be fooled, AGAIN.
Join me in this all-important podcast.
Thank you for your support.
— Jon Rappoport
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
We often remember events from our childhood that came from physical experiences such as a broken arm or falling into a stream. Most patients from yesteryear remember childhood rheumatic or scarlet fever. Parents bringing their children age 5-11 years for COVID-19 vaccination may be creating adverse childhood experiences based on the most recent CDC safety data published by Hause et al in MMWR.
Moderna, which had greater frequency of adverse events than Pfizer, for example, caused 30% of children to have fever and vomit. Combined, 22% reported that boosters had a negative health impact, 14% could not perform daily activities to return to school, and 2% were so sick they required acute medical care. Adverse childhood experiences can have lasting social and psychological ramifications later in life, particularly if they are repeated. No vaccine, no matter how theoretically compelling, should be in public use with these symptomatic side effects. Vaccines should have acceptable safety profiles with <5% having any significant short-term symptoms, be safe over the long term, provide at least 50% protection against a disease, inhibit transmission, and last at least a year. Faulty vaccines that underperform or make our kids sick should be rejected by parents and removed from the market to protect public safety.
If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.
Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.
Professor Shmuel Shapira, M.D., MPH, who served as the Director General of the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR) between 2013 and 2021, is one of thousands of renowned scientists who have raised serious concerns with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
The COVID-19 pandemic marked the first time in history when renowned vaccine experts, developers, scientists and doctors were ridiculed and labelled as “anti-vaxxers” en masse. I provide more examples in an article I published on January 9, 2023.
Stop the corporate media takeover: Big Tech censors and demonetizes independent media. We stay in the game because of YOU. Donate to help our work stay free. Click here to Donate.
Shapira is also the former head developer of Israel’s experimental coronavirus vaccine. He played a central role in the original development of Israel’s BriLife COVID-19 vaccine. It was a protein based live virus vaccine, not an mRNA shot.
The IIBR was tapped early in the pandemic, in February 2020, to develop a vaccine and seemed to be making significant progress until efforts were reportedly slowed and Israel launched its mass vaccination campaign mostly with the Pfizer-BioNTech shot last December.
The vaccine was eventually scraped, and ever since he has been quite critical about mRNA based COVID-19 vaccines. Despite having been vaccinated himself, Shapira feels that he and many others were coerced, pressured, and forced to take the jab. Lest we forget, many people lost their ability to work, put food on the table, pay their bills, travel, and more for choosing not to get vaccinated.
I took the jabs relatively late (for each dose), with great concern because of the mechanism with potential harm and not based on the safety history.
But sometimes even people who understand are swayed by pressures.
This is an honest attempt to explain.— Prof Shmuel C. Shapira MD MPH (@shmuelcshapira) January 21, 2023
According to Shapira, the approval and distribution of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines was not done from a place of ‘good’ and with the intention to serve others, but rather to “rake in billions.” He stated that they are “mediocre” vaccines and calling them even moderately effective is “pretty generous.”
“There are other vaccines that are far more effective. There are countries with lower vaccination rates that bore [the pandemic] just fine,”
Last May, Shapira stepped down from the directorship of the Biological Institute in a surprise turn of events that cast doubt on the future of the local inoculation venture. In a new book, he claimed that heavy government interference, unexplained regulatory delays, and some level of “sabotage” were also at play.
Shapira isn’t the only prominent figure in Israel to make such “controversial” comments. The head of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Tel Aviv University, Professor Ehud Qimron, has criticized the government for their pandemic policies. In a letter written to the Ministry of Health he outlines the failure of lockdowns, vaccines, and the failure to acknowledge natural immunity and vaccine injuries. The letter was very critical, you can access it here.
If you’re curious about the difference between protein based COVID vaccines and mRNA shots, you can find out more from this article published by Maryanne Demasi, PhD.
If you’re curious as to why people like myself didn’t get vaccinated, and reasons that go beyond what’s mentioned in this particular article, I provide a science/evidence based explanation in this article I published last month on December 12, 2022.
The next question becomes, with so much data, information and evidence that, at the very least, warrants freedom of choice, what can we do when governments who have so much power restrict our freedom for not complying?
In a world where our movement and ability to make a living may be threatened via non-compliance again in the future, what steps can we take to change this? How can we ensure the survival of information against governments and mainstream media organizations who only present a one sided, black and white perspective, while simultaneously ridiculing information and evidence that counters what they say?
I like to feel that when I look at the general public’s response at this moment to what happened during COVID, if something like this happens again, governments may have a very hard time enforcing mandates. This was in part thanks to many people, including experts in the field, speaking out against measures that were not really backed by science, but rather, propaganda.
Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.
Professor Shmuel Shapira, M.D., MPH, who served as the Director General of the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR) between 2013 and 2021, is one of thousands of renowned scientists who have raised serious concerns with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
The COVID-19 pandemic marked the first time in history when renowned vaccine experts, developers, scientists and doctors were ridiculed and labelled as “anti-vaxxers” en masse. I provide more examples in an article I published on January 9, 2023.
Stop the corporate media takeover: Big Tech censors and demonetizes independent media. We stay in the game because of YOU. Donate to help our work stay free. Click here to Donate.
Shapira is also the former head developer of Israel’s experimental coronavirus vaccine. He played a central role in the original development of Israel’s BriLife COVID-19 vaccine. It was a protein based live virus vaccine, not an mRNA shot.
The IIBR was tapped early in the pandemic, in February 2020, to develop a vaccine and seemed to be making significant progress until efforts were reportedly slowed and Israel launched its mass vaccination campaign mostly with the Pfizer-BioNTech shot last December.
The vaccine was eventually scraped, and ever since he has been quite critical about mRNA based COVID-19 vaccines. Despite having been vaccinated himself, Shapira feels that he and many others were coerced, pressured, and forced to take the jab. Lest we forget, many people lost their ability to work, put food on the table, pay their bills, travel, and more for choosing not to get vaccinated.
I took the jabs relatively late (for each dose), with great concern because of the mechanism with potential harm and not based on the safety history.
But sometimes even people who understand are swayed by pressures.
This is an honest attempt to explain.— Prof Shmuel C. Shapira MD MPH (@shmuelcshapira) January 21, 2023
According to Shapira, the approval and distribution of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines was not done from a place of ‘good’ and with the intention to serve others, but rather to “rake in billions.” He stated that they are “mediocre” vaccines and calling them even moderately effective is “pretty generous.”
“There are other vaccines that are far more effective. There are countries with lower vaccination rates that bore [the pandemic] just fine,”
Last May, Shapira stepped down from the directorship of the Biological Institute in a surprise turn of events that cast doubt on the future of the local inoculation venture. In a new book, he claimed that heavy government interference, unexplained regulatory delays, and some level of “sabotage” were also at play.
Shapira isn’t the only prominent figure in Israel to make such “controversial” comments. The head of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Tel Aviv University, Professor Ehud Qimron, has criticized the government for their pandemic policies. In a letter written to the Ministry of Health he outlines the failure of lockdowns, vaccines, and the failure to acknowledge natural immunity and vaccine injuries. The letter was very critical, you can access it here.
If you’re curious about the difference between protein based COVID vaccines and mRNA shots, you can find out more from this article published by Maryanne Demasi, PhD.
If you’re curious as to why people like myself didn’t get vaccinated, and reasons that go beyond what’s mentioned in this particular article, I provide a science/evidence based explanation in this article I published last month on December 12, 2022.
The next question becomes, with so much data, information and evidence that, at the very least, warrants freedom of choice, what can we do when governments who have so much power restrict our freedom for not complying?
In a world where our movement and ability to make a living may be threatened via non-compliance again in the future, what steps can we take to change this? How can we ensure the survival of information against governments and mainstream media organizations who only present a one sided, black and white perspective, while simultaneously ridiculing information and evidence that counters what they say?
I like to feel that when I look at the general public’s response at this moment to what happened during COVID, if something like this happens again, governments may have a very hard time enforcing mandates. This was in part thanks to many people, including experts in the field, speaking out against measures that were not really backed by science, but rather, propaganda.